Stephen Hawking once asked:
Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
If Stephen Hawking would like an answer
to that question, has he ever consider
asking a woman that question?
I don't mean a woman scientist..
i mean, just any woman.
Where did Stephen Hawking get the idea he is
entitled to know the answer?
Is he Moses?
On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 18:17:24 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
There is NO scientific basis for a rational world...
but there is a scientific basis for a irratio[nal*] world.
* Correcting Starfaker's dyslexia.
“Now my own suspicion is that the Universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose.” -- J.B.S. Haldane
On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 18:17:24 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
I mean, I observe the Earth and it doesn't appear rational to me....
doesn't that ...bother...you?
Using rational means in a irrational world sounds STUPID to me.
Luckly, only a small percentage of the people on earth are rational.
There is NO scientific basis for a rational world...
but there is a scientific basis for a irratio[nal*] world.
* Correcting Starfaker's dyslexia.
"Now my own suspicion is that the Universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose." -- J.B.S. Haldane
Well, I have suspicions about his suspicions.
"Nobel laureate Peter Medawar once referred to Haldane as, 'the
cleverest man I ever knew'”
I consider his suspicions as "clever" Fortunately, it doesn't seemed
to have prevented a sufficient number from trying to understand the
Cosmic All anyway.
Stephen Hawking once asked:
Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
If Stephen Hawking would like an answer
to that question, has he ever consider
asking a woman that question?
I don't mean a woman scientist..
i mean, just any woman.
Where did Stephen Hawking get the idea he is
entitled to know the answer?
On 4/10/25 2:20 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
The Universe is not an evolved biologcal system.
Jan
How do you know that? How can one state that as fact without having the
means to check it?
gharnagel wrote:
Well, I have suspicions about his suspicions.
"Nobel laureate Peter Medawar once referred to Haldane as, 'the
cleverest man I ever knew'”
I consider his suspicions as "clever" Fortunately, it doesn't seemed
to have prevented a sufficient number from trying to understand the
Cosmic All anyway.
no sir, my paper *_On the Divergent Matter of the Moving Koerpers Model_*
is correct. The abstract coercive conception of the Einstine's
*/_bended spacetime_/* is incorrect.
Thomas Heger <[email protected]> wrote:
But particles, atoms, rays and many other physical objects are not
called 'Körper'.
The title 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' had therefore a strange
connotation in German.
So you are incompetent in scientific German as well.
FYI: Körper (Physik)
Ein physikalischer Körper ist ein von seiner Umgebung abgrenzbares
Objekt, das eine Masse sowie ein Volumen besitzt.
Jan
Am Donnerstag000010, 10.04.2025 um 14:46 schrieb Arius Babaskin Rui:
gharnagel wrote:
Well, I have suspicions about his suspicions.
"Nobel laureate Peter Medawar once referred to Haldane as, 'the
cleverest man I ever knew'"
I consider his suspicions as "clever" Fortunately, it doesn't seemed
to have prevented a sufficient number from trying to understand the
Cosmic All anyway.
no sir, my paper *_On the Divergent Matter of the Moving Koerpers Model_* is correct. The abstract coercive conception of the Einstine's
*/_bended spacetime_/* is incorrect.
'K�rper' is a German word and means 'body'.
But unlike the English 'body', it is mainly used for the human body or something similar.
The German word 'K�rper' isn't a a synonym for 'object', but usually addresses biological bodies.
In geometry 'K�rper' is used in German to address objects with three dimensions. Also a certain type of mathematical objects are called 'K�rper'.
But particles, atoms, rays and many other physical objects are not
called 'K�rper'.
The title 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' had therefore a strange connotation in German.
J. J. Lodder wrote:
Thomas Heger <[email protected]> wrote:
But particles, atoms, rays and many other physical objects are not
called 'Körper'.
of course not, since are particles and waves, and not koerpers.
The title 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' had therefore a strange
connotation in German.
So you are incompetent in scientific German as well.
I'm an engineer from education and had no personal contacts to the
physics department. So: possibly they speak in a different idiom than engineers do.
To me the title 'moving bodies' (combined with 'electric forces') sounds
like a synonym for 'sex'.
...
I'm an engineer from education and had no personal contacts to the
physics department. So: possibly they speak in a different idiom than engineers do.
To me the title 'moving bodies' (combined with 'electric forces') sounds
like a synonym for 'sex'.
...
Am Freitag000011, 11.04.2025 um 20:04 schrieb Douglas Laterza:
J. J. Lodder wrote:
Thomas Heger <[email protected]> wrote:
But particles, atoms, rays and many other physical objects are not
called 'K�rper'.
of course not, since are particles and waves, and not koerpers.
The title 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' had therefore a strange
connotation in German.
So you are incompetent in scientific German as well.
Well, actually I'm not a physicist and don't know, how the physicists talk.
I'm an engineer from education and had no personal contacts to the
physics department. So: possibly they speak in a different idiom than engineers do.
To me the title 'moving bodies' (combined with 'electric forces') sounds
like a synonym for 'sex'.
Thomas Heger wrote:
I'm an engineer from education and had no personal contacts to the
physics department. So: possibly they speak in a different idiom than
engineers do.
To me the title 'moving bodies' (combined with 'electric forces') sounds
like a synonym for 'sex'.
...
since you are engineer neither. Ever heard of a blackbody in your area of interest?..
Thomas Heger <[email protected]> wrote:
Am Freitag000011, 11.04.2025 um 20:04 schrieb Douglas Laterza:
J. J. Lodder wrote:
Thomas Heger <[email protected]> wrote:
But particles, atoms, rays and many other physical objects are not
called 'Körper'.
of course not, since are particles and waves, and not koerpers.
The title 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' had therefore a strange >>>>> connotation in German.
So you are incompetent in scientific German as well.
Well, actually I'm not a physicist and don't know, how the physicists talk.
Yet you pretend to understand physics.
I'm an engineer from education and had no personal contacts to the
physics department. So: possibly they speak in a different idiom than
engineers do.
To me the title 'moving bodies' (combined with 'electric forces') sounds
like a synonym for 'sex'.
Yes, complete incompetence,
Why I think, that Einstein's title is 'mocking'?
Well, I conducted extensive studies on that particular paper and found,
that article is really bad and FULL of errors.
The number of errors is sooooo large, that they cannot be explained as mistakes, but another explanation is required.
On 04/13/2025 12:11 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Samstag000012, 12.04.2025 um 12:39 schrieb Bobbie Bakhvalov:
Thomas Heger wrote:
I'm an engineer from education and had no personal contacts to the
physics department. So: possibly they speak in a different idiom than
engineers do.
To me the title 'moving bodies' (combined with 'electric forces')
sounds
like a synonym for 'sex'.
...
since you are engineer neither. Ever heard of a blackbody in your
area of
interest?..
Actually you are right, because I'm not an engineer by profession.
But I own a very nice document from the university 'TU-Berlin', which
grants the academic degree 'Dipl.-Ing.' to me.
Therefore I'm allowed to use 'Dipl.-Ing.' on all letters that I write. I
could also write that on my door-bell (if I wanted to, what I didn't).
About 'blackbody radiation' I have heard before.
Most of the relevant equations I could write down here, without looking
them up.
Why I think, that Einstein's title is 'mocking'?
Well, I conducted extensive studies on that particular paper and found,
that article is really bad and FULL of errors.
The number of errors is sooooo large, that they cannot be explained as
mistakes, but another explanation is required.
This would be im my opinion an intentional offense ('mocking'), to which
the title would be the 'cherry on the cake'.
TH
Maybe he was just suffering through a language barrier.
Einstein developed a lot. Definitely there are differences early
Einstein and later Einstein. I contrast that with myself, having a very coherent narrative since I was very versed in all the super-classical theories then set loose on modern mathematics and premier physics.
Am Sonntag000013, 13.04.2025 um 10:07 schrieb Ross Finlayson:
On 04/13/2025 12:11 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Samstag000012, 12.04.2025 um 12:39 schrieb Bobbie Bakhvalov:
Thomas Heger wrote:
I'm an engineer from education and had no personal contacts to the
physics department. So: possibly they speak in a different idiom than >>>>> engineers do.
To me the title 'moving bodies' (combined with 'electric forces') sounds >>>>> like a synonym for 'sex'.
...
since you are engineer neither. Ever heard of a blackbody in your area of >>>> interest?..
Actually you are right, because I'm not an engineer by profession.
But I own a very nice document from the university 'TU-Berlin', which
grants the academic degree 'Dipl.-Ing.' to me.
Therefore I'm allowed to use 'Dipl.-Ing.' on all letters that I write. I >>> could also write that on my door-bell (if I wanted to, what I didn't).
About 'blackbody radiation' I have heard before.
Most of the relevant equations I could write down here, without looking
them up.
Why I think, that Einstein's title is 'mocking'?
Well, I conducted extensive studies on that particular paper and found,
that article is really bad and FULL of errors.
The number of errors is sooooo large, that they cannot be explained as
mistakes, but another explanation is required.
This would be im my opinion an intentional offense ('mocking'), to which >>> the title would be the 'cherry on the cake'.
TH
Maybe he was just suffering through a language barrier.
Well, Einstein was German and wrote in German, hence there was no
'language barrier'.
Einstein developed a lot. Definitely there are differences early
Einstein and later Einstein. I contrast that with myself, having a very
coherent narrative since I was very versed in all the super-classical
theories then set loose on modern mathematics and premier physics.
Sure, he developed and became a much better physicist.
But I'm talking about a certain paper from 1905, when Einstein was 26.
On 2025-04-14 03:58:05 +0000, Thomas Heger said:
Am Sonntag000013, 13.04.2025 um 10:07 schrieb Ross Finlayson:
On 04/13/2025 12:11 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Samstag000012, 12.04.2025 um 12:39 schrieb Bobbie Bakhvalov:
Thomas Heger wrote:
I'm an engineer from education and had no personal contacts to the >>>>> physics department. So: possibly they speak in a different idiom than >>>>> engineers do.
To me the title 'moving bodies' (combined with 'electric forces') sounds
like a synonym for 'sex'.
...
since you are engineer neither. Ever heard of a blackbody in your area of
interest?..
Actually you are right, because I'm not an engineer by profession.
But I own a very nice document from the university 'TU-Berlin', which
grants the academic degree 'Dipl.-Ing.' to me.
Therefore I'm allowed to use 'Dipl.-Ing.' on all letters that I write. I >>> could also write that on my door-bell (if I wanted to, what I didn't). >>>
About 'blackbody radiation' I have heard before.
Most of the relevant equations I could write down here, without looking >>> them up.
Why I think, that Einstein's title is 'mocking'?
Well, I conducted extensive studies on that particular paper and found, >>> that article is really bad and FULL of errors.
The number of errors is sooooo large, that they cannot be explained as >>> mistakes, but another explanation is required.
This would be im my opinion an intentional offense ('mocking'), to which >>> the title would be the 'cherry on the cake'.
TH
Maybe he was just suffering through a language barrier.
Well, Einstein was German and wrote in German, hence there was no
'language barrier'.
Einstein developed a lot. Definitely there are differences early
Einstein and later Einstein. I contrast that with myself, having a very
coherent narrative since I was very versed in all the super-classical
theories then set loose on modern mathematics and premier physics.
Sure, he developed and became a much better physicist.
But I'm talking about a certain paper from 1905, when Einstein was 26.
Forget your sex obsession: "black body" was an established term long
before 1905. Newton wrote "Do not black Bodies conceive heat more
easily from Light than those of other Colours do, by reason that the
Light falling on them is not reflected outwards, but enters into the
Bodies, and is often reflected and refracted within them, until it be
stifled and lost?"
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 148:15:31 |
| Calls: | 12,091 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 15,000 |
| Messages: | 6,517,554 |