XPost: sci.physics
On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 10:39:19 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Maciej Wozniak <[email protected]> wrote:
W dniu 01.02.2025 o 23:28, J. J. Lodder pisze:
Nobody is "rejecting Euclid"
A lie. Of course.
Because you say so? I checked: nobody is "rejecting Euclid".
Indeed, and au contraire:
Nowadays Euclidean geometry is -defined- as that kind of geometry
in which the Pythagorean theorem holds.
And - according to the teachings of your moronic church -
does Pythagorean theorem hold? For real?
Poor stinker Python has never answerred, he's always
dodging and changing the subject. How about you?
You might have noticed that I make it a habit
of never replying to your silly rants.
I'll make an exception for once,
because you are trying to mislead the innocent kiddies
who might stray in here.
Of course the Pythagorean theorem holds -in Euclidean geometry-.
A forteriori, it -defines- Euclidean geometry, nowadays.
The Pythagoras theorem is just that. Euclidean geometry is defined by
axioms or self-evident and unquestionable truths upon which all theorems
are derived. Not the other way around.
It does of course not hold in any other kind of geometry,
by definition,
All other geometries are mappings based on Euclidean geometry, if we are talking engineering sense.
Jan
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)