ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog wrote:

On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 20:17:25 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog <[email protected]> wrote:

The mere fact that theory and over a century of experimental
validation have led to the speed of light being adopted as a constant
does not invalidate experiments intended to verify to increasing
levels of precision the correctness of the assumptions that led to
it adoption as a constant.

So you haven't understood what it is all about.
I rest my case,

You prematurely rest your case.

Since 1983, the speed of light in vacuum has been defined as exactly
equal to 299,792,458 meters per second.

Given this definition, is there any point to conducting experiments
to test whether there are anisotropies in the speed of light due to
Earth's motions in space? Such as these: https://tinyurl.com/8hkry7k3

The definition of the speed of light is such that there can't be.

Right?

There is 'no such thing' as a vacumn that exist anywhere...

the definition is a fraud.

There is no 'vacumn' that exist in which an "experiment" can be
performed at.






--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)