1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY

  • Why can't relativists understand =?UTF-8?B?dGhpcz8=?=

    From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 18 21:32:22 2024
    Why can't relativists understand this?

    A. There is no ether.
    B. There is no ether wind.
    C. Therefore, there is no time dilation.

    Then, no experiments can demonstrate time dilation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 18 22:40:48 2024
    ProkaryoticCaspaseHo: Time dilation presumes the existence of an ether.
    Without an ether there is no time dilation. Einstein kept the LT to save
    the ether and discarded the ether. You are standing on his shoulders,
    making the same stupid mistake.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 18 22:22:04 2024
    ProkaryoticCaspaseHo: It is easily detectable in the MMX. It has to be
    an interpretation for the lack of an ether wind. The alleged time
    dilation is coincidentally precisely the amount necessary to cancel the
    ether wind, and its cause is unknown. This presumes an ether. Without an
    ether, there is no conceivable time dilation. Your interpretation of the experiment is wrong.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 18 22:45:37 2024
    ProkaryoticCaspaseHo: Congratulations! If you found time dilaton, you
    saved the ether! Now modern science has an ether!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 19 18:43:05 2024
    Starmaker: The speed of sound is the same regardless of the emitter's
    speed. The speed of the observer must be added or subtracted. To deny
    this for light is irrational nonsense = relativity. For any reasonable
    person, this is enough to know Einstein was a quack.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 19 21:09:47 2024
    Starmaker: Whether light is a wave or a particle it necessarily has a
    speed including that of the observer/destination.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 19 21:39:03 2024
    R.Hachel translated= "Not only is there no ether, but there is not even absolute space. "The Lord weaves his four-dimensional web on
    nothingness" say the wise Hebrew relativist theorists....... The problem
    of comprehension comes from a mismatched term. We should not say "time dilation" but "internal reciprocal chronotropy dilation". It is not time
    that expands by changing the frame of reference, but the way in which
    the internal structure of watches measures time. To'=To/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
    An additional effect is then added: the external Doppler effect on the
    beats. We then come to t'=t(1+cosμ.v/c)/sqrt(1-v²/c²) This is something
    I have been teaching for forty years, but the idea is so high that it
    seems impossible that a single moron in the universe could understand
    what I mean. That's life."

    I do not buy length contraction either. I don't see any relevance to
    your speculations.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 19 21:32:34 2024
    Mikko: You use time dilation to prevent relative speeds for light?
    Equally irrational.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 19 21:42:52 2024
    Mikko: By proving time dilation you have proven the ether. You have
    saved it from the null result.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to LaurenceClarkCrossen on Wed Nov 20 10:58:27 2024
    LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

    R.Hachel translated= "Not only is there no ether, but there is not even absolute space. "The Lord weaves his four-dimensional web on
    nothingness" say the wise Hebrew relativist theorists....... The problem
    of comprehension comes from a mismatched term. We should not say "time dilation" but "internal reciprocal chronotropy dilation". It is not time
    that expands by changing the frame of reference, but the way in which
    the internal structure of watches measures time. To'=To/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
    An additional effect is then added: the external Doppler effect on the
    beats. We then come to t'=t(1+cosμ.v/c)/sqrt(1-v²/c²) This is something
    I have been teaching for forty years, but the idea is so high that it
    seems impossible that a single moron in the universe could understand
    what I mean. That's life."

    I do not buy length contraction either. I don't see any relevance to
    your speculations.


    The quote: "The Lord weaves his four-dimensional web on
    nothingness"

    has nothing to do with science or physics. It is 100 percent a religious
    quote.

    Lawrence M. Krauss wrote a book entittled:


    A Universe from Nothing



    Nothing in Klaus religion means...God.

    Since, according to Klaus religion, God is no thing.

    also according to Klaus religion

    God is also known as ayin "ay-yin") which means...Nothingness.



    So, the title of Krauss book "A Universe from Nothing" translates to:


    A Universe from God

    or

    God is Nothing





    So, when yous say the universes comes from nothing/nothingness...you're
    talking religion, not science.


    Jewish scientists cannot be trusted.




    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)