1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY

  • =?UTF-8?Q?Celle-l=C3=A0=20est=20trop=20belle=2C=20je=20l=27encadre=2E=2

    From Richard Hachel@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 14 17:28:56 2024
    XPost: fr.sci.physique

    "There is no such thing as "universal anisochrony": it is a false notion. You're conflating time dilation (a real phenomenon) with something else."
    g.harnagel

    Trop beau.

    R.H.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Python@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 14 20:46:21 2024
    Le 14/08/2024 à 19:28, Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :



    "There is no such thing as "universal anisochrony": it is a false notion. You're conflating time dilation (a real phenomenon) with something else."
                                           g.harnagel
    Trop beau.
    R.H.

    You are so confused that he is confused about your own confusion. It is
    your fault, not his.

    This is sooo stupid that he couldn't guess you would confuse time delay
    (which is conventional depending on a synch. procedure) with time
    dilation.

    In addition to use a ill-defined terminology ("anisochrony" is
    meaningless).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gharnagel@21:1/5 to Python on Wed Aug 14 19:01:28 2024
    On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:46:21 +0000, Python wrote:

    Le 14/08/2024 à 19:28, Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :

    "There is no such thing as "universal anisochrony": it is a false
    notion.
    You're conflating time dilation (a real phenomenon) with something
    else."
                                           g.harnagel
    Trop beau.
    R.H.

    You are so confused that he is confused about your own confusion. It is
    your fault, not his.

    This is sooo stupid that he couldn't guess you would confuse time delay (which is conventional depending on a synch. procedure) with time
    dilation.

    In addition to use a ill-defined terminology ("anisochrony" is
    meaningless).

    Actually, I did guess that he confused time dilation with finite speed
    of light delay, and said so a while back. He claimed it wasn't, so
    that's why I said "conflating time dilation (a real phenomenon) with
    something else."

    But he certainly is describing time dilation between clocks that are
    stationary wrt each other, which is hogwash. If it walks like a duck,
    quacks like a duck ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mikko@21:1/5 to Richard Hachel on Thu Aug 15 12:28:41 2024
    On 2024-08-14 17:28:56 +0000, Richard Hachel said:

    "There is no such thing as "universal anisochrony": it is a false notion. You're conflating time dilation (a real phenomenon) with something else."
    g.harnagel
    Trop beau.
    R.H.

    There is no "anisochrony" until you define "isochrony".

    --
    Mikko

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)