a) I said - X will happen. And then X happened
b) I said - X will happen. And then Y happened. But
I can explain! Y is incorrect!! And improper!!! and
nonstandard!!!! And it doesn't count!!!!!!!!!! what
should happen is definitely X!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I can PROVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Which of the above is describing the situation of
"I predicted X correctly" - a or b? What do you think,
poor brainwashed halfbrains?
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
a) I said - X will happen. And then X happened
b) I said - X will happen. And then Y happened. But
I can explain! Y is incorrect!! And improper!!! and
nonstandard!!!! And it doesn't count!!!!!!!!!! what
should happen is definitely X!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I can PROVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Which of the above is describing the situation of
"I predicted X correctly" - a or b? What do you think,
poor brainwashed halfbrains?
Poor eighth-brain Wozzie proves his stupidity. He
doesn't define what either x or y mean. Maybe X = Y,
in which case it's not an either/or situation: BOTH
a AND b are true. Wotta dimwit!
On 2024-06-25 16:28:11 +0000, gharnagel said:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
a) I said - X will happen. And then X happened
b) I said - X will happen. And then Y happened. But
I can explain! Y is incorrect!! And improper!!! and
nonstandard!!!! And it doesn't count!!!!!!!!!! what
should happen is definitely X!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I can PROVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Which of the above is describing the situation of
"I predicted X correctly" - a or b? What do you think,
poor brainwashed halfbrains?
Poor eighth-brain Wozzie proves his stupidity. He
doesn't define what either x or y mean. Maybe X = Y,
in which case it's not an either/or situation: BOTH
a AND b are true. Wotta dimwit!
Let's try to put it in terms that Wozzie can understand:
a) Wozzie said - Wozzie will be elected President of Poland. And then
Wozzie was elected President of Poland
b) (X ≠ Y) Wozzie said - Wozzie will be elected President of Poland.
And then Andrzej Duda was elected President of Poland
b') (X = Y) Wozzie said - Wozzie will be elected President of Poland.
And then Wozzie was elected President of Poland
On 2024-06-25 16:28:11 +0000, gharnagel said:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
a) I said - X will happen. And then X happened
b) I said - X will happen. And then Y happened. But
I can explain! Y is incorrect!! And improper!!! and
nonstandard!!!! And it doesn't count!!!!!!!!!! what
should happen is definitely X!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I can PROVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Which of the above is describing the situation of
"I predicted X correctly" - a or b? What do you think,
poor brainwashed halfbrains?
Poor eighth-brain Wozzie proves his stupidity. He
doesn't define what either x or y mean. Maybe X = Y,
in which case it's not an either/or situation: BOTH
a AND b are true. Wotta dimwit!
Let's try to put it in terms that Wozzie can understand:
Le 25/06/2024 à 19:15, Athel Cornish-Bowden a écrit :
On 2024-06-25 16:28:11 +0000, gharnagel said:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
a) I said - X will happen. And then X happened
b) I said - X will happen. And then Y happened. But
I can explain! Y is incorrect!! And improper!!! and
nonstandard!!!! And it doesn't count!!!!!!!!!! what
should happen is definitely X!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I can PROVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Which of the above is describing the situation of
"I predicted X correctly" - a or b? What do you think,
poor brainwashed halfbrains?
Poor eighth-brain Wozzie proves his stupidity. He
doesn't define what either x or y mean. Maybe X = Y,
in which case it's not an either/or situation: BOTH
a AND b are true. Wotta dimwit!
Let's try to put it in terms that Wozzie can understand:
:-) Good luck with that!
W dniu 25.06.2024 o 20:08, Python pisze:
Le 25/06/2024 à 19:15, Athel Cornish-Bowden a écrit :
On 2024-06-25 16:28:11 +0000, gharnagel said:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
a) I said - X will happen. And then X happened
b) I said - X will happen. And then Y happened. But
I can explain! Y is incorrect!! And improper!!! and
nonstandard!!!! And it doesn't count!!!!!!!!!! what
should happen is definitely X!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I can PROVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Which of the above is describing the situation of
"I predicted X correctly" - a or b? What do you think,
poor brainwashed halfbrains?
Poor eighth-brain Wozzie proves his stupidity. He
doesn't define what either x or y mean. Maybe X = Y,
in which case it's not an either/or situation: BOTH
a AND b are true. Wotta dimwit!
Let's try to put it in terms that Wozzie can understand:
:-) Good luck with that!
Oh, stinker Python is opening its muzzle again,
and trying again to pretend he knows something.
And again he can't answer a simplw question.
Of course.
W dniu 25.06.2024 o 20:08, Python pisze:
Le 25/06/2024 à 19:15, Athel Cornish-Bowden a écrit :
Let's try to put it in terms that Wozzie can understand:
:-) Good luck with that!
Oh, stinker Python is opening its muzzle again,
and trying again to pretend he knows something.
And again he can't answer a simplw question.
Of course.
Wozzie's simpleton mind can't fathom that X and Y need
not have any relation to each other since he didn't
specify what X and Y were.
After all, he didn't specify that b was Y and not X, etc.
X might be "A bird flew in the window" and Y might be "A
cockroach ate my cheese." Both may be true, both may be
false, or X may be true while B false or B may be true
while A false. Or they may be indeterminate because the
events were neither observed nor recorded.
Le 26/06/2024 à 15:08, [email protected] (gharnagel) a écrit :
Wozzie's simpleton mind can't fathom that X and Y need
not have any relation to each other since he didn't
specify what X and Y were.
After all, he didn't specify that b was Y and not X, etc.
X might be "A bird flew in the window" and Y might be "A
cockroach ate my cheese." Both may be true, both may be
false, or X may be true while B false or B may be true
while A false. Or they may be indeterminate because the
events were neither observed nor recorded.
How?
Python is one of the top posters on science forums?
W dniu 26.06.2024 o 16:11, Richard Hachel pisze:
Le 26/06/2024 à 15:08, [email protected] (gharnagel) a écrit :
Wozzie's simpleton mind can't fathom that X and Y need
not have any relation to each other since he didn't
specify what X and Y were.
After all, he didn't specify that b was Y and not X, etc.
X might be "A bird flew in the window" and Y might be "A
cockroach ate my cheese." Both may be true, both may be
false, or X may be true while B false or B may be true
while A false. Or they may be indeterminate because the
events were neither observed nor recorded.
How?
Python is one of the top posters on science forums?
And I didn't know it?
I thought he was a buffoon, a puppet.
But he is unable to understand what an apparent speed is
in physics, and why such a speed can take on all values from
zero to infinity as it approaches.
He's a puppet, a buffoon.
Harrie is an idiot;
he can claim that Nature Herself is speaking to him and
his idiot gurus,
or that GPS clocks are not real,
or that poor stinker Python is one of the top posters.
Who cares.
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 26.06.2024 o 16:11, Richard Hachel pisze:
Le 26/06/2024 à 15:08, [email protected] (gharnagel) a écrit :
Wozzie's simpleton mind can't fathom that X and Y need
not have any relation to each other since he didn't
specify what X and Y were.
After all, he didn't specify that b was Y and not X, etc.
X might be "A bird flew in the window" and Y might be "A
cockroach ate my cheese." Both may be true, both may be
false, or X may be true while B false or B may be true
while A false. Or they may be indeterminate because the
events were neither observed nor recorded.
How?
How not observed? Do YOU observe a bird flying in the bedroom
window when everyone is in the parlor?
Python is one of the top posters on science forums?
And I didn't know it?
I thought he was a buffoon, a puppet.
You thought wrong. You were projecting again.
But he is unable to understand what an apparent speed is
in physics, and why such a speed can take on all values from
zero to infinity as it approaches.
"Apparent speed" is not real speed. It's an artifact of the
fact that the speed of light is not infinite and has little
use in physics except to explain why the speed of light isn't
exceeded in certain cases of observation. Making it a central
topic in a relativity discussion seems lame to me.
He's a puppet, a buffoon.
The Good Doctor is hallucinating again.
Harrie is an idiot;
And now Wozzie-fool is projecting again.
he can claim that Nature Herself is speaking to him and
his idiot gurus,
Of course nature speaks to us.
Dishonest Wozzie-fool intentionally "misunderstands in an attempt
to confuse issues. Good human beings don't do that.
See, trash - I've proven the
moronic mumble of your idiot guru to be
not even consistent and you can do nothing
about it apart of barking, insulting and
slandering. But you will do what you can
for the glory of your moronic church - that's
what it's training its doggies for, after all.
Maciej Wozniak lied:
See, trash - I've proven the
moronic mumble of your idiot guru to be
not even consistent and you can do nothing
about it apart of barking, insulting and
slandering. But you will do what you can
for the glory of your moronic church - that's
what it's training its doggies for, after all.
Says the barking, insulting, slandering liar.
See, Trash-talker, your insane baloney has been
soundly refuted, but you're too stupid to
realize it.
See, trash - I've proven the
moronic mumble of your idiot guru to be
not even consistent and you can do nothing
about it apart of barking, insulting and
slandering. But you will do what you can
for the glory of your moronic church - that's
what it's training its doggies for, after all.
Maciej Wozniak Lied:
See, trash - I've proven the
moronic mumble of your idiot guru to be
not even consistent and you can do nothing
about it apart of barking, insulting and
slandering. But you will do what you can
for the glory of your moronic church - that's
what it's training its doggies for, after all.
Says the barking, insulting, slandering liar.
See, Trash-talker, your insane baloney has been
soundly refuted
W dniu 26.06.2024 o 21:11, gharnagel pisze:
Maciej Wozniak Lied:
See, trash - I've proven the
moronic mumble of your idiot guru to be
not even consistent and you can do nothing
about it apart of barking, insulting and
slandering. But you will do what you can
for the glory of your moronic church - that's
what it's training its doggies for, after all.
Says the barking, insulting, slandering liar.
See, Trash-talker, your insane baloney has been
soundly refuted
Nature Herself has told you that, sure.
[Lying baloney deleted]
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 26.06.2024 o 21:11, gharnagel pisze:
Maciej Wozniak Lied:
See, trash - I've proven the
moronic mumble of your idiot guru to be
not even consistent and you can do nothing
about it apart of barking, insulting and
slandering. But you will do what you can
for the glory of your moronic church - that's
what it's training its doggies for, after all.
Says the barking, insulting, slandering liar.
See, Trash-talker, your insane baloney has been
soundly refuted
Nature Herself has told you that, sure.
Wozzie is jealous because he can't hear truth.
"They are creatures who can’t hear the music of the spheres."
-- Albert Einstein
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 149:15:46 |
| Calls: | 12,091 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 15,000 |
| Messages: | 6,517,572 |