1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY

  • Cretin crank Richard Hertz perseveres

    From Dono.@21:1/5 to Richard Hertz on Sun Oct 8 16:49:48 2023
    On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 4:19:12 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:

    3) GR prediction: 0.43 arcsec/year OR 0.103564055 arcsec/orbit.


    Dumbestfuck

    0.43 arcsec/year is the DIFFERENCE between the Newtonan prediction and the measured value. You have put your foot in your mouth once again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Hertz@21:1/5 to Dono. on Sun Oct 8 19:31:49 2023
    On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 8:49:50 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:

    <snip>

    Dumbestfuck

    0.43 arcsec/year is the DIFFERENCE between the Newtonan prediction and the measured value. You have put your foot in your mouth once again.

    Dyslexic imbecile, that was exactly my point since the OP. NASA

    It seems that you persist with your old traits like a true shill, troll and stupid romanian gypsy. Never one true word written by you, cretin relativist.

    JPL Horizons online database delivers results based on Kepler-Newton, not GR-PPN.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dono.@21:1/5 to Richard Hertz on Sun Oct 8 19:37:28 2023
    On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 7:31:51 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
    On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 8:49:50 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:

    <snip>
    Dumbestfuck

    0.43 arcsec/year is the DIFFERENCE between the Newtonan prediction and the measured value. You have put your foot in your mouth once again.
    Dyslexic imbecile,

    Nice new signature, Dick


    that was exactly my point since the OP. NASA

    You are not only an imbecile, you are an imbecile and a liar. Your sniped you own point, here it is again:

    3) GR prediction: 0.43 arcsec/year



    JPL Horizons online database delivers results based on Kepler-Newton, not GR-PPN.


    You are lying. Again. Keep it up, dumbestfuck.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Hertz@21:1/5 to Dono. on Sun Oct 8 19:50:12 2023
    On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 11:37:30 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
    On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 7:31:51 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:

    <snip>

    JPL Horizons online database delivers results based on Kepler-Newton, not GR-PPN.
    You are lying. Again. Keep it up, dumbestfuck.

    I repeat my previous post. No lies, just pure data computed from JPL Horizons database.

    I provided enough information so that an imbecile like you can do a fact-check, lazy dog.

    https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/2WGF6G3hB2c/m/6Rab-uEGBAAJ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dono.@21:1/5 to Richard Hertz on Mon Oct 9 07:22:12 2023
    On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 7:50:14 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
    On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 11:37:30 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
    On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 7:31:51 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
    <snip>
    JPL Horizons online database delivers results based on Kepler-Newton, not GR-PPN.
    You are lying. Again. Keep it up, dumbestfuck.
    I repeat my previous post.


    Repeating the same idiocy doesn't make it true, it just make you douly idiotic.



    https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/2WGF6G3hB2c/m/6Rab-uEGBAAJ

    Referring to your prior imbecilities is not a valid reference, it is just reinforcing the fact that you are a crank.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)