XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

There are no inertial frames with respect to aether or space. All bodies
move relative to each other and to the static aether. The speed with
respect to aether cannot be found with current techniques. But that is
not important for travelling to a star.

Just point the nose of your craft to the star or planet and keep on accelerating at rate a with internal force, following Arindam's
inertia-busting physics.

That is, after time T the speed v will be aT which could be say 2c.
Coast at speed 2c for time T'. Then decelerate (just point stern to
start) at a for time T. WOOF woof-woof woof woof woof-woof you have made
it to the star at time T'+2T. Depending upon a that could be say 1 year
of Earth time.

Now, which kid here did not understand what we woofers have just woofed?

WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs, out to save humanity from
its stupidities and capacities)

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 1:51:41 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:

There are no inertial frames with respect to aether or space. All bodies
move relative to each other and to the static aether. The speed with
respect to aether cannot be found with current techniques. But that is
not important for travelling to a star.

Just point the nose of your craft to the star or planet and keep on accelerating at rate a with internal force, following Arindam's inertia-busting physics.

That is, after time T the speed v will be aT which could be say 2c.
Coast at speed 2c for time T'. Then decelerate (just point stern to
start) at a for time T. WOOF woof-woof woof woof woof-woof you have made
it to the star at time T'+2T. Depending upon a that could be say 1 year
of Earth time.

Now, which kid here did not understand what we woofers have just woofed?

WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs, out to save humanity from
its stupidities and capacities)

--

Those kiddies who have never heard of Helmholtz, Einstein, Feynman etc.
will benefit superbly.

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 1:51:41 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:

There are no inertial frames with respect to aether or space. All bodies
move relative to each other and to the static aether. The speed with
respect to aether cannot be found with current techniques. But that is
not important for travelling to a star.

Just point the nose of your craft to the star or planet and keep on accelerating at rate a with internal force, following Arindam's inertia-busting physics.

That is, after time T the speed v will be aT which could be say 2c.
Coast at speed 2c for time T'. Then decelerate (just point stern to
start) at a for time T. WOOF woof-woof woof woof woof-woof you have made
it to the star at time T'+2T. Depending upon a that could be say 1 year
of Earth time.

Now, which kid here did not understand what we woofers have just woofed?

WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs, out to save humanity from
its stupidities and capacities)

Read rapacities, or evil capacities, for the last word above.

--

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)