Throwing papers at us (i.e. in usenet) although
better than nothing, it still is an extremely
inefficient way to communicate.
On 2/4/25 6:24 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
i,
But obviously readers of sci.physics like
Physfitfreak <[email protected]> are stupid
as fuck. Cannot relate AI to physics.
Did you try that and didn't see I could relate? No. You just packed and
ran away as soon as I came forward to discuss it with you. You're a fraud.
Proof that you cannot relate is here:
Throwing papers at us (i.e. in usenet) although
better than nothing, it still is an extremely
inefficient way to communicate.
I think papers are extremly efficent. What do
you expect me to read the paper for you?
Physfitfreak schrieb:
On 2/4/25 6:24 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
i,
But obviously readers of sci.physics like
Physfitfreak <[email protected]> are stupid
as fuck. Cannot relate AI to physics.
Did you try that and didn't see I could relate? No. You just packed
and ran away as soon as I came forward to discuss it with you. You're
a fraud.
On 2/4/25 6:47 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
This is my last ad hominem. But
you make it really easy for me:
You are a moron that cannot read (papers).
Newbies aren't morons. You are.
On 2/4/25 6:46 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
Proof that you cannot relate is here:
Throwing papers at us (i.e. in usenet) although
better than nothing, it still is an extremely
inefficient way to communicate.
I think papers are extremly efficent. What do
you expect me to read the paper for you?
Only a fraud throws papers at "newbies." I've called your bluff. Live
with it now.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 06:18:49 |
| Calls: | 12,100 |
| Calls today: | 8 |
| Files: | 15,003 |
| Messages: | 6,517,919 |
| Posted today: | 1 |