XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics.electromag
Le 02/04/2024 à 02:50, Arindam Banerjee a écrit :
Le 30/03/2024 à 00:25, Richard Hachel a écrit :
For a long time now, I have provided proof that the theory of relativity, at >> least as taught today, was incorrect.
It is rubbish.
I was then accused, for ideological convenience, of being anti-relativist, which
is false. I never said anywhere that the theory of relativity was false, I simply
said, and tenaciously, that it was incorrect, which is far from being the same
thing.
No, it is not incorrect. It is rubbish. For light speed varies with the speed
of the emitter, as shown by the correct understanding of the MMI expt results on
one hand; and there is violation of inertia with the Lorenz force not having equal
and opposite reaction. With inertia violated, with my railgun experiments, the
essential basis for Eisntein's 1905 paper gets outed.
I am surprised that you want to refute things that are so obvious, and especially by giving false arguments.
It is not possible that the speed of light can be changed by the speed of
the source because the speed of light in a frame of reference is measured
with TWO watches, and the two watches that measure it are in the
receiver's frame of reference .
This de facto makes the speed of the source completely useless to take
into account to produce this speed.
On the other hand, if the speed of the source has no importance on the
speed of the wave, it is important to know that it has an importance on
the wavelength and the energy of the photon.
λ'=λ.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)/(1+cosα.Vo/c)
λ'=λ.(1-cosα'.Vo/c)/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
λ'=λ.(1+cosµ.Vo/c)/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
hυ'=hυ.(1+cosα.Vo/c)/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
hυ'=hυ.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)/(1-cosα'.Vo/c)
hυ'=hυ.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)/(1+cosµ.Vo/c)
Thank you for listening.
R.H.
--
Ce message a été posté avec Nemo: <
http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=yicmqV-LmSkUGZMrLIlAvr5aftM@jntp>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)