[email protected] <
[email protected]> wrote:
On Sunday, February 11, 2024 at 1:31:09 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
[email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
If the atom can compete with light's absolute
it shows it has an absolute motion of its own
competing...
Just more of your typical, incoherent, babbling nonsense.
Can science measure a difference between the absolute and the relative
to prove it? There is a reason to not believe in relative.
The stars can't really change in their distance.
Only by their local orbits that are not relatives.
The universe has an absolute expanding size
always.
The Earth moves in more than one way.
Your world line shares the Earth's turn and
the Earth's orbit. Those days and year are not relatives.
Time dilation and kinetic energies are absolute quantities.
Absolute motion obeys the speed limit
but two frames obeying the speed limit can converge above c and
below 2c.
If atoms can compete with light and light converges
at 2c they can do the same.
And yet another giant steaming pile of confused, ignorant, incoherent,
word salad, idiotic babbling gibberish from the resident moron.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)