This is the final of my graphs showing violation of inertia, for now. This is about the movement of the centre of mass of the entire body, with respect to time. What is centre of mass? Intutively, if you find the point of a body, or a set of distributed
bodies, such that, at that moment of time, it all balances out with no tilt at any side, then you have found the centre of mass at that point! Thus from the data of the position of the armature with respect to the ground, and the position of the centre
of mass of the gun (minus armature) we can find at any time the position of the centre of mass of the total system. Now, as per the First Law of Motion, that can never be shifted by other than an external force. But could it shifted by internal force?
During the period 1998-2000, I used many methods to try to shift the centre of mass by internal force. One idea of mine was to make a sort of raft, which I would hit with a rod to make the raft move, and with that, myself as well. It did not work, The
action of pushing it did move the raft, but there was an equal reaction to that, so internal force of that sort did not work. I tried some other devices, with the help of my young daughters, but still no result! No acceleration was possible with
internal force! Newton ruled!
Around 1999, I came across an interesting discussion in the Usenet newsgroup sci.physics.electromag, which talked about the lack of reaction in rail guns. I pounced upon that idea, and worked out that indeed if there was no reaction in that sort of
electromagnetic reaction, then the entire physics as we know it would need revision., leading us to faster than light travel among other useful gains in the engineering sense, from a new class of motors! All that was presented in my book "To the Stars!'
published online in my "adda" website (now defunct) in early 2000.
There was not much interest in this, till my father and mother came to visit me in Melbourne in 2002. My father became keenly interested in my new ideas, and he used his influence with some wonderful journalists to make my new ideas see the light of day
in the international press, in 2003. It was hushed up soon enough, with the awesome power of the global media and their sponsors, and since then, I became the subject of ridicule and persecution, on a global scale! Still, I had the support of my close
family, so I managed to survive to this day.
Back to the graph, now. The centre of mass does not move with the spring action. And in the earliest phase of electromagnetic action, but after that it gains velocity, meaning there is a net acceleration/force acting upon it. Now, instead of the
current causing the action with a net internal force, there had been a huge spring instead causing the armature to move equally fast, the centre of mass would not have budged at all. For the railgun-motor would have been pushed back a lot more.
When the armature hits the arrestors, the whole system stops, so the velocity of the centre of mass stops. But as the momentum of the armature is given to the entire system, there is gain of speed which reaches a maximum. After that, due to friction and
finally an interference from an external object, the centre of mass stops moving.


https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=7556463141048084&set=pcb.7556513371043061

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)