Sorry I seemed to have missed this show, but must include it.

The entire series of NOVA shows on Ancient Earth-- Birth of the Sky, then Frozen then Life Rising, then Inferno then Humans, five shows in all needs to be rewritten to more exacting science, not someone's gross opinion. And with that heavy hand of
propaganda of CO2 to blame for every major catastrophe, when it is not to blame.

Geology is one of the poorest science communities that barely keeps up with discovery and with Commonsense. For example, it took Wegener and his concept of Continental Drift more than 50 years to replace the idiotic Static Earth, even though the evidence
for continental drift was staggering. I was victim of that geology silliness in 1968 with going to college and learning from a geology textbook that the continents never move. And this NOVA series with a propaganda ploy theme of CO2 here CO2 there and it
causes so much harm when CO2 should barely be mentioned at all.

And now in 2023, with this NOVA on CO2 propaganda in 5 shows, is another chapter in idiotic science pandered off as being what happened.

I will write at least 6 books correcting NOVA, and I hope NOVA goes back and rewrites their propaganda science to fit the reality and truth.

AP

AP's 262nd Book of Science// Rewriting NOVA: Ancient Earth: Birth of the Sky and all 5 programs of NOVA Ancient Earth

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

So the first episode of this 5 part series of NOVA::Ancient Earth: Birth of the Sky takes Earth from its beginning to a time in which Earth had an atmosphere.

Atmospheres are not unusual for planets, why, gee whiz, the gas giants are huge atmospheres.

But the start of this NOVA series should start with valid true physics and astronomy.

The entire Universe is but one big atom of Plutonium, specifically 231Pu isotope and this gigantic atom that is the entire Cosmos contains smaller atoms inside itself. That is the beginning.

And galaxies and stars and planets compose the Cosmic Protons and Cosmic Muons that comprise the Atom Totality Universe.

We see evidence of this nowadays by looking at the mappings of galaxies at CalTech with Dr. Jarrett.

--- Quoting from my 148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1
by Archimedes Plutonium ---


1a) Caltech's Jarrett cosmic ring starting to be in evidence of Atom Totality. Is it the Cosmic Muon or a ring of the Cosmic Proton, perhaps even a Cosmic Neutron?

--- quoting ---
ned.ipac.caltech.edu
http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/jarrett/papers/LSS/ 
The third layer (0.01 < z < 0.02) is dominated by the P-P
supercluster
 (left side of image) and the P-I supercluster extending up into the
 ZoA terminating as the Great Attractor region (notably Abell 3627)  disappears behind a wall of Milky Way stars. An intriguing "ring" or
 chain of galaxies seems to circle/extend from the northern to the
 southern Galactic hemisphere (see also Figure 1). It is unknown
 whether this ring-like structure is physically associated with the
 cosmic web or an artifact of projection. 
--- end quoting --- 

--- end quoting my 148th book

Alright, here is a break in the explanation. Something I need to better understand myself. I am talking about the Dirac New Radioactivities, where the protons inside of atoms manufacture electricity which is storaged in neutrons and when those neutrons
grow from 1 eV all the way out to 945MeV, the neutron then becomes a neutron in a new atom or splits into being a hydrogen atom or becomes a heavier isotope of the original atom it was created in.

What I am stuck on is how this creation process of new atoms forms a broad variety of new atoms, or does it form mostly more hydrogen? This does not explain why oxygen is so abundant.

But there is some evidence in comets as to their abundance of water that sheds light on the Dirac New Radioactivities process. Comets are rich in water and carbon. So then we can expect that Dirac New Radioactivities Process produces atoms like the ones
present. So that water makes more water in Dirac New Radioactivities.

But how does Dirac New Radioactivities form atoms up to iron at 26 protons and beyond? Here we must consider that the environment we find atoms plays a role in what atoms are formed. In a hot environment like the Sun, most newly created atoms via Dirac
New Radioactivities are hydrogen and helium atoms. But in cold environments like Earth and the terrestrial planets, the newly formed neutron goes to becoming a new proton to the existing atom and thus a higher atomic element.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

VG8gYmV0dGVyIHVuZGVyc3RhbmQgRGlyYWMncyBOZXcgUmFkaW9hY3Rpdml0eSB0aGF0IGdpdmVz IGJpcnRoIHRvIG5ldyBhdG9tcywgbmV3IG1hdHRlciBpbiB0aGUgd29ybGQsIHdlIG11c3Qgc3R1 ZHkgdGhlIENvc21pYyBBYnVuZGFuY2Ugb2YgRWxlbWVudHMuIE9mIGNvdXJzZSB0aGUgbWVjaGFu aXNtIG9mIERpcmFjJ3MgTmV3IFJhZGlvYWN0aXZpdHkgaXMgdGhlIHBlcnBldHVhbCBtb3Rpb24g b2YgdGhlIG11b24gaW5zaWRlIGV2ZXJ5IHByb3RvbiB0aGF0IHByb2R1Y2VzIGVsZWN0cmljaXR5 IHdoaWNoIGNvbmRlbnNlcyBpbiBhIG5ldXRyb24gYW5kIGJlY29tZXMgYSBuZXcgYXRvbSBvciBp c290b3BlIG9yIGVsZW1lbnQuDQoNCkhlcmUgSSBhbSBxdW90aW5nIGZyb20gbXkgMm5kIHB1Ymxp c2hlZCBib29rIG9mIHNjaWVuY2UsIG15IENoZW1pc3RyeSB0ZXh0Ym9vay4NCg0KLS0tIFF1b3Rp bmcgZnJvbSBteSAybmQgcHVibGlzaGVkIGJvb2sgb2Ygc2NpZW5jZSAiVHJ1ZSBDaGVtaXN0cnk6 IENoZW1pc3RyeSBTZXJpZXMsIGJvb2sgMSBLaW5kbGUgRWRpdGlvbiIgYnkgQXJjaGltZWRlcyBQ bHV0b25pdW0gKEF1dGhvcikgIC0tLQ0KDQotLS0gcXVvdGluZyBpbiBwYXJ0cyBTb3VyY2VzOiBB bmRlcnMgYW5kIEViaWhhcmEsIDE5ODIgU29sYXItc3lzdGVtIA0KwqBhYnVuZGFuY2VzIG9mIHRo ZSANCsKgZWxlbWVudHMgR2VvY2hpbWljYSBldCBDb3Ntb2NoaW1pY2EgQWN0YSBWb2wuIDQ2LCBw YWdlcyAyMzYzLTIzODAuIA0KwqBUaGUgYWJvdmUgdGFibGUgaXMgdGhlIGFidW5kYW5jZSBjb21w aWxhdGlvbiBBbmRlcnMgYW5kIEdyZXZlc3NlLCANCsKgMTk4OCwgDQrCoEdlb2NoaW1pY2EgZXQg Q29zbW9jaGltaWNhIEFjdGEuIA0KDQphdG9taWMgbnVtYmVyIHJlbGF0aXZlIGNvc21pYyBhYnVu ZGFuY2VzIG9mIHRoZSBlbGVtZW50cyANCsKgYmFzZWQgb24gbWV0ZW9ycyBhbmQgYW5hbHlzaXMg b2YgdGhlIFN1biANCg0KQXRvbXMvMTBeNiBTaSANCsKgMSBoeWRyb2dlbiBIIDIuNzkgeCAxMF4x MCANCsKgMiBoZWxpdW0gSGUgMi43MiB4IDEwXjkgDQrCoDMgbGl0aGl1bSBMaSA1Ny4xIA0KwqA0 IGJlcnlsbGl1bSBCZSAwLjczIA0KwqA1IGJvcm9uIEIgMjEuMiANCsKgNiBjYXJib24gQyAxLjAx IHggMTBeNyANCsKgNyBuaXRyb2dlbiBOIDMuMTMgeCAxMF42IA0KwqA4IG94eWdlbiBPIDIuMzgg eCAxMF43IA0KwqA5IGZsdW9yaW5lIEYgODQzIA0KwqAxMCBuZW9uIE5lIDMuNDQgeCAxMF42IA0K wqAxMSBzb2RpdW0gTmEgNS43NCB4IDEwXjQgDQrCoDEyIG1hZ25lc2l1bSBNZyAxLjA3NCB4IDEw XjYgDQrCoDEzIGFsdW1pbnVtIEFsIDguNDkgeCAxMF40IA0KwqAxNCBzaWxpY29uIFNpIDEuMDAg eCAxMF42IA0KwqAxNSBwaG9zcGhvcnVzIFAgMS4wNCB4IDEwXjQgDQrCoDE2IHN1bGZ1ciBTIDUu MTUgeCAxMF41IA0KwqAxNyBjaGxvcmluZSBDbCA1MjQwIA0KwqAxOCBhcmdvbiBBciAxLjAxIHgg MTBeNSANCsKgMTkgcG90YXNzaXVtIEsgMzc3MCANCsKgMjAgY2FsY2l1bSBDYSA2LjExIHggMTBe NCANCsKgMjEgc2NhbmRpdW0gU2MgMzQuMiANCsKgMjIgdGl0YW5pdW0gVGkgMjQwMCANCsKgMjMg dmFuYWRpdW0gViAyOTMgDQrCoDI0IGNocm9taXVtIENyIDEuMzUgeCAxMF40IA0KwqAyNSBtYW5n YW5lc2UgTW4gOTU1MCANCsKgMjYgaXJvbiBGZSA5LjAwIHggMTBeNSANCsKgMjcgY29iYWx0IENv IDIyNTAgDQrCoDI4IG5pY2tlbCBOIDQuOTMgeCAxMF40IA0KwqAyOSBjb3BwZXIgQ3UgNTIyIA0K wqAzMCB6aW5jIFpuIDEyNjAgDQrCoDMxIGdhbGxpdW0gR2EgMzcuOCANCsKgMzIgZ2VybWFuaXVt IEdlIDExOSANCsKgMzMgYXJzZW5pYyBBcyA2LjU2IA0KwqAzNCBzZWxlbml1bSBTZSA2Mi4xIA0K wqAzNSBicm9taW5lIEJyIDExLjggDQrCoDM2IGtyeXB0b24gS3IgNDUgDQrCoDM3IHJ1YmlkaXVt IFJiIDcuMDkgDQrCoDM4IHN0cm9udGl1bSBTciAyMy41IA0KwqAzOSB5dHRyaXVtIFkgNC42NCAN CsKgNDAgemlyY29uaXVtIFpyIDExLjQgDQrCoDQxIG5pb2JpdW0gTmIgMC42OTggDQrCoDQyIG1v bHliZGVudW0gTW8gMi41NSANCsKgNDMgdGVjaG5ldGl1bSBUYyANCsKgNDQgcnV0aGVuaXVtIFJ1 IDEuODYgDQrCoDQ1IHJob2RpdW0gUmggMC4zNDQgDQrCoDQ2IHBhbGxhZGl1bSBQZCAxLjM5IA0K wqA0NyBzaWx2ZXIgQWcgMC40ODYgDQrCoDQ4IGNhZG1pdW0gQ2QgMS42MSANCsKgNDkgaW5kaXVt IEluIDAuMTg0IA0KwqA1MCB0aW4gU24gMy44MiANCsKgNTEgYW50aW1vbnkgU2IgMC4zMDkgDQrC oDUyIHRlbGx1cml1bSBUZSA0LjgxIA0KwqA1MyBpb2RpbmUgSSAwLjkwIA0KwqA1NCB4ZW5vbiBY ZSA0LjcgDQrCoDU1IGNlc2l1bSBDcyAwLjM3MiANCsKgNTYgYmFyaXVtIEJhIDQuNDkgDQrCoDU3 IGxhbnRoYW51bSBMYSAwLjQ0NjAgDQrCoDU4IGNlcml1bSBDZSAxLjEzNiANCsKgNTkgcHJhc2Vv ZHltaXVtIFByIDAuMTY2OSANCsKgNjAgbmVvZHltaXVtIE5kIDAuODI3OSANCsKgNjEgcHJvbWV0 aGl1bSBQbSANCsKgNjIgc2FtYXJpdW0gU20gMC4yNTgyIA0KwqA2MyBldXJvcGl1bSBFdSAwLjA5 NzMgDQrCoDY0IGdhZG9saW5pdW0gR2QgMC4zMzAwIA0KwqA2NSB0ZXJiaXVtIFRiIDAuMDYwMyAN CsKgNjYgZHlzcHJvc2l1bSBEeSAwLjM5NDIgDQrCoDY3IGhvbG1pdW0gSG8gMC4wODg5IA0KwqA2 OCBlcmJpdW0gRXIgMC4yNTA4IA0KwqA2OSB0aHVsaXVtIFRtIDAuMDM3OCANCsKgNzAgeXR0ZXJi aXVtIFliIDAuMjQ3OSANCsKgNzEgbHV0ZXRpdW0gTHUgMC4wMzY3IA0KwqA3MiBoYWZuaXVtIEhm IDAuMTU0IA0KwqA3MyB0YW50YWx1bSBUYSAwLjAyMDcgDQrCoDc0IHR1bmdzdGVuIFcgMC4xMzMg DQrCoDc1IHJoZW5pdW0gUmUgMC4wNTE3IA0KwqA3NiBvc21pdW0gT3MgMC42NzUgDQrCoDc3IGly aWRpdW0gSXIgMC42NjEgDQrCoDc4IHBsYXRpbnVtIFB0IDEuMzQgDQrCoDc5IGdvbGQgQXUgMC4x ODcgDQrCoDgwIG1lcmN1cnkgSGcgMC4zNCANCsKgODEgdGhhbGxpdW0gVEwgMC4xODQgDQrCoDgy IGxlYWQgUGIgMy4xNSANCsKgODMgYmlzbXV0aCBCaSAwLjE0NCANCsKgODQgcG9sb25pdW0gUG8g DQrCoDg1IGFzdGF0aW5lIEF0IA0KwqA4NiByYWRvbiBSbiANCsKgODcgZnJhbmNpdW0gRnIgDQrC oDg4IHJhZGl1bSBSYSANCsKgODkgYWN0aW5pdW0gQWMgDQrCoDkwIHRob3JpdW0gVGggMC4wMzM1 IA0KwqA5MSBwcm90b2FjdGluaXVtIFBhIA0KwqA5MiB1cmFuaXVtIFUgMC4wMDkwIA0KwqA5MyBu ZXB0dW5pdW0gTnAgDQrCoDk0IHBsdXRvbml1bSBQdSANCg0KLS0tIHF1b3RpbmcgaW4gcGFydCBT b3VyY2VzOiBBbmRlcnMgYW5kIEViaWhhcmEsIDE5ODIgU29sYXItc3lzdGVtIA0KwqBhYnVuZGFu Y2VzIG9mIHRoZSANCsKgZWxlbWVudHMgR2VvY2hpbWljYSBldCBDb3Ntb2NoaW1pY2EgQWN0YSBW b2wuIDQ2LCBwYWdlcyAyMzYzLTIzODAuIA0KwqBUaGUgYWJvdmUgdGFibGUgaXMgdGhlIGFidW5k YW5jZSBjb21waWxhdGlvbiBBbmRlcnMgYW5kIEdyZXZlc3NlLCANCsKgMTk4OCwgDQrCoEdlb2No aW1pY2EgZXQgQ29zbW9jaGltaWNhIEFjdGEuIA0KDQpGdW5jdGlvbiB0aGF0IGRlc2NyaWJlcyBD b3NtaWMgQWJ1bmRhbmNlIG9mIEVsZW1lbnRzIFJlOiBOZXcgQ2hlbWlzdHJ5IFBlcmlvZGljIFRh YmxlIG9mIEVsZW1lbnRzDQoNCk5vdyB3aWtpcGVkaWEgaGFzIGFuIGV4Y2VsbGVudCB0YWJsZSBv ZiBjb3NtaWMgYWJ1bmRhbmNlIG9mIGNoZW1pY2FsIGVsZW1lbnRzIG9ubHkgaSB3aXNoIHRoZXkg Y29tcGxldGUgaXQgb3V0IHRvIHBsdXRvbml1bS4gSSBlc3BlY2lhbGx5IGxpa2UgdGhlaXIgImF0 b20gZnJhY3Rpb24iICwgc29tZXRoaW5nIEFuZGVycyBkaWQgbm90IGRvLiANCg0KLS0tIHF1b3Rp bmcgV2lraXBlZGlhIC0tLSANCk1vc3QgYWJ1bmRhbnQgbnVjbGlkZXMgaW4gdGhlIFNvbGFyIFN5 c3RlbVs4XSANCk51Y2xpZGXCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgQcKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqBNYXNzIGZy YWN0aW9uIGluIHBhcnRzIHBlciBtaWxsaW9uwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoEF0b20gZnJhY3Rpb24g aW4gcGFydHMgcGVyIG1pbGxpb24gDQpIeWRyb2dlbi0xwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDHCoMKgwqDC oMKgwqDCoMKgNzA1LDcwMMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqA5MDksOTY0IA0KSGVsaXVtLTTCoMKgwqDC oMKgwqDCoMKgNMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAyNzUsMjAwwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDg4LDcxNCAN Ck94eWdlbi0xNsKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAxNsKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqA1LDkyMMKgwqDCoMKg wqDCoMKgwqA0NzcgDQpDYXJib24tMTLCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMTLCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKg MywwMzLCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMzI2IA0KTml0cm9nZW4tMTTCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMTTC oMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMSwxMDXCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMTAyIA0KTmVvbi0yMMKgwqDCoMKg wqDCoMKgwqAyMMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAxLDU0OMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAxMDAgDQoNClNp bGljb24tMjjCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMjjCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgNjUzwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKg wqDCoDMwIA0KTWFnbmVzaXVtLTI0wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDI0wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDUx M8KgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAyOCANCklyb24tNTbCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgNTbCoMKgwqDCoMKg wqDCoMKgMSwxNjnCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMjcgDQpTdWxmdXItMzLCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKg MzLCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMzk2wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDE2IA0KSGVsaXVtLTPCoMKgwqDC oMKgwqDCoMKgM8KgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAzNcKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAxNSANCkh5ZHJvZ2Vu LTLCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMsKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAyM8KgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAxNSAN Ck5lb24tMjLCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMjLCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMjA4wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKg wqDCoDEyIA0KTWFnbmVzaXVtLTI2wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDI2wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDc5 wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDQgDQpDYXJib24tMTPCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMTPCoMKgwqDCoMKg wqDCoMKgMzfCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgNCANCk1hZ25lc2l1bS0yNcKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAy NcKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqA2OcKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqA0IA0KQWx1bWluaXVtLTI3wqDCoMKg wqDCoMKgwqDCoDI3wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDU4wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDMgDQpBcmdvbi0z NsKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAzNsKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqA3N8KgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAzIA0K Q2FsY2l1bS00MMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqA0MMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqA2MMKgwqDCoMKgwqDC oMKgwqAyIA0KU29kaXVtLTIzwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDIzwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDMzwqDC oMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDIgDQpJcm9uLTU0wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDU0wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDC oDcywqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDIgDQpTaWxpY29uLTI5wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDI5wqDCoMKg wqDCoMKgwqDCoDM0wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDIgDQpOaWNrZWwtNTjCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKg NTjCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgNDnCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMSANClNpbGljb24tMzDCoMKgwqDC oMKgwqDCoMKgMzDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMjPCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMSANCklyb24tNTfC oMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgNTfCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMjggDQoNCk9uIFR1ZXNkYXksIE1hcmNo IDI3LCAyMDE4IGF0IDk6MDE6MDEgUE0gVVRDLTUsIEFyY2hpbWVkZXMgUGx1dG9uaXVtIHdyb3Rl IGluIHNjaS5waHlzaWNzOg0KRnVuY3Rpb24gdGhhdCBkZXNjcmliZXMgQ29zbWljIEFidW5kYW5j ZSBvZiBFbGVtZW50cyBSZTogTmV3IENoZW1pc3RyeSBQZXJpb2RpYyBUYWJsZSBvZiBFbGVtZW50 cw0KDQpBbm90aGVyIHJlYXNvbiBpIGxpa2UgdGhpcyB0YWJsZSwgZm9yIGl0IHNob3dzIGh5ZHJv Z2VuIGFuZCBoZWxpdW0gaXNvdG9wZXMuIA0KDQpOZXdzZ3JvdXBzOiBzY2kucGh5c2ljcw0KRGF0 ZTogVGh1LCAyOSBNYXIgMjAxOCAxMToxNzoxMCAtMDcwMCAoUERUKQ0KU3ViamVjdDogTW90aW9u IGlzIGludmVyc2UgZnVuY3Rpb24gb2YgQWJ1bmRhbmNlIFJlOiBGdW5jdGlvbiB0aGF0IGRlc2Ny aWJlcyBDb3NtaWMgQWJ1bmRhbmNlIG9mIEVsZW1lbnRzIFJlOiBOZXcgQ2hlbWlzdHJ5IFBlcmlv ZGljIFRhYmxlIG9mIEVsZW1lbnRzDQpGcm9tOiBBcmNoaW1lZGVzIFBsdXRvbml1bSA8cGx1dG9u aXVtLi4uLkBnbWFpbC5jb20+DQpJbmplY3Rpb24tRGF0ZTogVGh1LCAyOSBNYXIgMjAxOCAxODox NzoxMSArMDAwMA0KDQpNb3Rpb24gaXMgaW52ZXJzZSBmdW5jdGlvbiBvZiBBYnVuZGFuY2UgUmU6 IEZ1bmN0aW9uIHRoYXQgZGVzY3JpYmVzIENvc21pYyBBYnVuZGFuY2Ugb2YgRWxlbWVudHMgUmU6 IE5ldyBDaGVtaXN0cnkgUGVyaW9kaWMgVGFibGUgb2YgRWxlbWVudHMNCg0KT24gVHVlc2RheSwg TWFyY2ggMjcsIDIwMTggYXQgMTo0Mzo1NiBQTSBVVEMtNSwgQXJjaGltZWRlcyBQbHV0b25pdW0g d3JvdGU6IA0KPiBOb3cgaW4gbXkgQXRvbSBUb3RhbGl0eSBib29rIG9mIDIwMTcgSSB3cm90ZSB0 aGF0IHRoZSBmb3JjZXMgb2YgTmF0dXJlIGNhbiBiZSBhbGwgcmVwcmVzZW50ZWQgaW4gb25lIGdy YXBoIHdoZXJlIHdlIGdldCBhIGZvcmNlIGxhdyBvZiBWIHByb3BvcnRpb25hbCB0byBSLCB0aGVu IFYgcHJvcG9ydGlvbmFsIHRvIDEvUiBhbmQgZmluYWxseSB0aGUgaW52ZXJzZSBzcXVhcmUgMS9S XjIuIEluIG90aGVyIHdvcmRzLCBhbGwgZm9yY2VzIHRha2Ugb24gYSBvbmUgZ3JhcGhpbmcgb2Yg dGhlbSBpbnRvIG9uZSBmdW5jdGlvbiwgYSBsb2dhcml0aG1pYyBmdW5jdGlvbiwgYnV0IHNwbGl0 IHVwIGludG8gdGhyZWUgZGlmZmVyZW50IHNlY3Rpb25zLiANCj4gDQo+IC0tLSBxdW90aW5nIDIw MTcgLS0tIA0KPiBDb21tZW50czo6IGFscmlnaHQsIHRoZSBFTSBncmF2aXR5IGlzIGEgTG9nYXJp dGhtaWMgZnVuY3Rpb24gRz0gTG4oeCkgaXQgaXMgbm90IGFuIGludmVyc2Ugc3F1YXJlLCBiZWNh dXNlIGl0IGhhcyB0byBjb250YWluIHRocmVlIGRpZmZlcmVudCB0eXBlcyBvZiBmb3JjZXMgViBw cm9wb3J0aW9uYWwgUiwgcHJvcG9ydGlvbmFsIHRvIDEvUiwgcHJvcG9ydGlvbmFsIHRvIDEvUl4y LiBJbiB0aGUgYWJvdmUgcGFnZXMgSSByZWZlcnJlZCB0aGUgcmVhZGVyIHRvIHNwaXJhbCBnYWxh eHkgcm90YXRpb24gY3VydmVzIHRvIHNlZSB0aGVzZSAzIGRpZmZlcmVudCB0eXBlcy4gQnV0IGxl dCBtZSB0cnkgdG8gZHJhdyBhIExuKHgpIGZ1bmN0aW9uIGFuZCBicmVhayBpdCBpbnRvIHRocmVl IHR5cGVzLiANCj4gDQo+IA0KPiBeIMKgIMKgIMKgIMKgIMKgIMKgIMKgX18tX18tXy0tLS0gDQo+ IHwgwqAgwqAgwqAgwqAgwqArIMKgIMKgIMKgIMKgIMKgIMKgIDEvUl4yIA0KPiB8IMKgIMKgIMKg KyAxL1IgDQo+IHwgwqAgwqAvIA0KPiB8IMKgLyBSIA0KPiB8L19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fPiAN Cj4gZ3JhcGggb2YgYm90aCBzcGlyYWwgZ2FsYXh5IHJvdGF0aW9uIGN1cnZlIGFuZCBncmFwaCBv ZiB0aGUgTG4oeCkgZnVuY3Rpb24gb2YgbWF0aCBzY29vdGVkIHVwIGludG8gdGhlIDFzdCBRdWFk cmFudCBPbmx5IChhbmQgb25lIGNhbiByZWZsZWN0IHRoYXQgdGhlIGV4cCh4KSBmdW5jdGlvbiBp cyBzY29vdGVkIG92ZXIgaW4gdGhlIDFzdCBRdWFkcmFudCkuIA0KPiANCg0KTm93IFBoeXNpY3Mg bm9yIE1hdGggaGFzIGV2ZXIgdGhpcyBiZWZvcmUsIHNvIHRoaXMgaXMgbmV3IHRvIGJvdGggcGh5 c2ljcyBhbmQgbWF0aC4gTmV3IGJlY2F1c2UgaXQgaXMgYSBqb2luaW5nIG9mIHBhcnRzIG9mIHRo cmVlIGRpZmZlcmVudCBmdW5jdGlvbnMgc3BsaWNpbmcgdGhlbSB0b2dldGhlciB0byBiZSBpbiB0 aGUgZW5kIG9uZSB3aG9sZSBmdW5jdGlvbiBvZiBhIGxvZ2FyaXRobWljIHR5cGUgb2YgZnVuY3Rp b24uIE5vdCB3aG9sbHkgbG9nYXJpdGhtaWMgYnV0IGluIHNvbWUgc29ydCBvZiAiaWRlYWxpemF0 aW9uIGxvZ2FyaXRobWljIi4gDQoNCllvdSBjYW4ga2luZCBvZiBzZWUgd2hhdCBJIG1lYW4sIHdo ZXJlIEkgc3BsaWNlIHRvZ2V0aGVyIFYgcHJvcG9ydGlvbmFsIHRvIFIgYXMgYSBmdWxseSBzdHJh aWdodGxpbmUsIHRoZW4gSSBzcGxpY2Ugb250byB0aGF0IDEvUiwgdGhlbiwgZmluYWxseSBzcGxp Y2Ugb250byAxL1Igd2l0aCAxL1JeMiANCg0KQW5kIEkgZW5kIHVwIHdpdGggd2hhdCByZXNlbWJs ZXMgb3ZlcmFsbCBhIGxvZ2FyaXRobWljIGZ1bmN0aW9uLCBidXQgbm90IHJlYWxseSBsb2cgZnVu Y3Rpb24gZm9yIGl0IGlzIHRoZSBzcGxpY2luZyB0b2dldGhlciBvZiB0aHJlZSBkaWZmZXJlbnQg ZnVuY3Rpb25zIHRvIG1ha2UgYSBuZXcgb25lLiBUaGUgYWJvdmUgaXMgUm90YXRpb24gQ3VydmUg b2YgTW90aW9uIG9mIHN0YXJzIGluIGdhbGF4aWVzLiBTbyB0aGUgYWJvdmUgaXMgZm9yLS0tIE1v dGlvbiwgbW90aW9uLiANCg0KQnV0LCB0aGUgaW52ZXJzZSBvZiB0aGUgYWJvdmUgSSB3YW50IHRv IHVzZSBhcyBhIEFidW5kYW5jZSBvZiBDaGVtaWNhbCBFbGVtZW50cywgdGhlIGludmVyc2UsIG5v dCBhcyBtb3Rpb24sIG1vdGlvbiwgYnV0IGFzIGFidW5kYW5jZSwgYWJ1bmRhbmNlLiANCg0KTW90 aW9uIG1vdGlvbiBsb29rcyBsaWtlIHRoaXMgDQrCoCBfX18gDQovIA0KDQpBYnVuZGFuY2UsIGFi dW5kYW5jZSBsb29rcyBsaWtlIHRoaXMgDQoNClxfX18gDQoNCk5vdyBoZXJlIEkgYW0gZ29pbmcg b3V0IG9uIGEgbGltYiBvZiB0aG91Z2h0LCBmb3IgdG8gbWFrZSB0aGUgYWJvdmUgdHJ1ZSwgaW1w b3NlcyBhIGxvdCBvbiB0aGUgZmFjdHMgYXMgd2Uga25vdyB0aGVtLiBPdXQgb24gYSBsaW1iIGJ5 IHNheWluZyBvdXIgZGF0YSBvZiB0aGUgYWJ1bmRhbmNlIG9mIGVsZW1lbnRzL2lzb3RvcGVzIGlz IGh1Z2VseSBzaG9kZHkgYW5kIGFsbW9zdCB3b3J0aGxlc3MuIA0KDQpNb3N0IGFidW5kYW50IG51 Y2xpZGVzIGluIHRoZSBTb2xhciBTeXN0ZW1bOF0gDQpOdWNsaWRlwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoEHC oMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgTWFzcyBmcmFjdGlvbiBpbiBwYXJ0cyBwZXIgbWlsbGlvbsKgwqDCoMKg wqDCoMKgwqBBdG9tIGZyYWN0aW9uIGluIHBhcnRzIHBlciBtaWxsaW9uIA0KSHlkcm9nZW4tMcKg wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAxwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDcwNSw3MDDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgOTA5 LDk2NCANCkhlbGl1bS00wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDTCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMjc1LDIwMMKg wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqA4OCw3MTQgDQpPeHlnZW4tMTbCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMTbCoMKgwqDC oMKgwqDCoMKgNSw5MjDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgNDc3IA0KQ2FyYm9uLTEywqDCoMKgwqDCoMKg wqDCoDEywqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDMsMDMywqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDMyNiANCk5pdHJvZ2Vu LTE0wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDE0wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDEsMTA1wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDC oDEwMiANCk5lb24tMjDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMjDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMSw1NDjCoMKg wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMTAwIA0KDQpTaWxpY29uLTI4wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDI4wqDCoMKgwqDC oMKgwqDCoDY1M8KgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAzMCANCk1hZ25lc2l1bS0yNMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKg wqAyNMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqA1MTPCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMjggDQpJcm9uLTU2wqDCoMKg wqDCoMKgwqDCoDU2wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDEsMTY5wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDI3IA0KU3Vs ZnVyLTMywqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDMywqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDM5NsKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKg wqAxNiANCkhlbGl1bS0zwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDPCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMzXCoMKgwqDC oMKgwqDCoMKgMTUgDQpIeWRyb2dlbi0ywqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDLCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKg MjPCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMTUgDQpOZW9uLTIywqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDIywqDCoMKgwqDC oMKgwqDCoDIwOMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAxMiANCk1hZ25lc2l1bS0yNsKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKg wqAyNsKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqA3OcKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqA0IA0KQ2FyYm9uLTEzwqDCoMKg wqDCoMKgwqDCoDEzwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDM3wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDQgDQpNYWduZXNp dW0tMjXCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMjXCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgNjnCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKg NCANCkFsdW1pbml1bS0yN8KgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAyN8KgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqA1OMKgwqDC oMKgwqDCoMKgwqAzIA0KQXJnb24tMzbCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMzbCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKg NzfCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMyANCkNhbGNpdW0tNDDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgNDDCoMKgwqDC oMKgwqDCoMKgNjDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgMiANClNvZGl1bS0yM8KgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAy M8KgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAzM8KgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAyIA0KSXJvbi01NMKgwqDCoMKgwqDC oMKgwqA1NMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqA3MsKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAyIA0KU2lsaWNvbi0yOcKg wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAyOcKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAzNMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAyIA0KTmlj a2VsLTU4wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDU4wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDQ5wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDC oDEgDQpTaWxpY29uLTMwwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDMwwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDIzwqDCoMKg wqDCoMKgwqDCoDEgDQpJcm9uLTU3wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDU3wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoDI4 IA0KDQpUaGUgYWJvdmUgd2FzIGZyb20gV2lraXBlZGlhIHdpdGggZm9vdG5vdGUgcmVmZXJlbmNl IHRvIERhdmlkIEFybmV0dCAxOTk2LCBTdXBlcm5vdmFlIGFuZCBOdWNsZW9zeW50aGVzaXMsIFBy aW5jZXRvbiBVbml2LiANCg0KTm93IHRoZSBhYm92ZSBvZiBBcm5ldHQsIDE5OTYsIG1heWJlIHRo ZSBiZXN0IHdlIGhhdmUgb2YgY29zbWljIGFidW5kYW5jZSBvZiBlbGVtZW50cy9pc290b3BlcyBi dXQgaW4gbXkgb3BpbmlvbiwgaXQgaXMgZmFyIGZhciB0b28gc2hvZGR5IA0KDQpXZSBzZWUgaXJv biBpc290b3BlcyB0aGVyZSBhIGxvdCwgdGVsbGluZyBtZSB0aGF0IHRoZSBvdmVyYWxsIGlzIHZl cnkgc2hvZGR5LCBmb3IgdGhlcmUgc2hvdWxkIGJlIGxhcmdlIGFidW5kYW5jZSBmb3IgYWxsIHRo ZSBlbGVtZW50cyBmcm9tIGh5ZHJvZ2VuIHRvIG5lb24uIFNvIG11Y2ggc28sIHRoYXQgdGhlIGNo YXJ0IGFib3ZlIG1pc3NlcyB0aG9zZSB0aGF0IHdvdWxkIGJlIGRpcmVjdGx5IHByb3BvcnRpb25h bCBhcyBpbiBtb3Rpb24gb2YgViB0byBSLCBhIHN0cmFpZ2h0bGluZSwgYWx0aG91Z2ggdmVyeSBz dGVlcCwgc3RlZXBlciB0aGFuIGlzIFYgdG8gUiwgYnV0IHN0aWxsIGEgc3RyYWlnaHRsaW5lIGZv ciBoeWRyb2dlbiB0byBuZW9uIGluIGFidW5kYW5jZS4gDQoNClRoZW4sIGZvciBzb2RpdW0gb3V0 IHRvIGtyeXB0b24sIHRoZSBhYnVuZGFuY2UgZm9sbG93cyBhIDEvUiBncmFwaCBzcGxpY2Ugb24s IGFuZCBmaW5hbGx5IGZyb20gUmIgdG8gdGhlIHJlbWFpbmRlciBvZiBhbGwgZWxlbWVudHMvaXNv dG9wZXMgZm9sbG93cyBhIDEvUl4yLiANCg0KTm93LCBieSB0aGUgc3RhbmRhcmRzIG9mIExvZ2lj LCB3aHkgc2hvdWxkIHRoZSBBYnVuZGFuY2UgZ3JhcGggYmUgdGhlIGludmVyc2Ugb2YgTW90aW9u IGdyYXBoPyBJcyB0aGVyZSBhbnkgbG9naWNhbCBmb290aW5nIEkgY2FuIHN0YW5kIG9uLCB0byBw cm9jbGFpbSBzdWNoIGEgY29uamVjdHVyZS4gSXMgaXQgc291bmQgaW4gcGh5c2ljcywgdGhhdCBN b3Rpb24gYmVsaWVzIEFidW5kYW5jZT8gVGhhdCB0aGUgdHdvIGFyZSBjb25uZWN0ZWQsIGZ1bmRh bWVudGFsbHksIGFuZCB0aGF0IGZvciBNb3Rpb24gaXMgYSBMb2dhcml0aG1pYyBmdW5jdGlvbi0t IGlkZWFsbHksIGJ1dCB0aGUgQWJ1bmRhbmNlIGlzIGFsc28gbG9nYXJpdGhtaWMgaW52ZXJzZS4g DQoNCkl0IG1ha2VzIHNlbnNlLCBkb2VzIGl0IG5vdCwgdGhhdCBNb3Rpb24gYW5kIEFtb3VudCBh cmUganVzdCB0d28gdmlld3Mgb2Ygb25lIHRoaW5nLiANCg0KLS0tIGVuZCBxdW90aW5nIGZyb20g bXkgMm5kIHB1Ymxpc2hlZCBib29rIG9mIHNjaWVuY2UgIlRydWUgQ2hlbWlzdHJ5OiBDaGVtaXN0 cnkgU2VyaWVzLCBib29rIDEgS2luZGxlIEVkaXRpb24iIGJ5IEFyY2hpbWVkZXMgUGx1dG9uaXVt IChBdXRob3IpICAtLS0NCg0KQVA=

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

I am likely to have to revise my 2018 thoughts of the causes of the Abundance of Chemical Elements. Back in 2018 I suspected a link to Motion. But here in 2023, I suspect the link up is more involved with the amount of heat in the environment the protons
are located. So in stars, the protons produce more hydrogen and helium. In cold planets, the protons produce more elements up to iron and beyond.

So I think a new graph is called for.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Alright, I am going to use Halliday & Resnick, PHYSICS, part 2, extended version, 1986 for graphs of thermodynamics on page 1095, Planck's Radiation Law.

In figure 49-4
The solid curve shows the experimental spectral radiancy for radiation from a cavity at 2000 K. The classical Rayleigh-Jeans law and the Wien law are shown as dashed lines. The shaded bar represents the range of visible wavelengths.
---end quoting H&R page 1096 ---

The Rayleigh-Jeans law is very much the same as the Cosmic Abundance of elements, although it has minor up and downs if we include the odd-numbered elements along with even-numbered elements. And of course a few anomalies, such as 3 lithium Li 57.1
4 beryllium Be 0.73
5 boron B 21.2.

For these anomalies, what happens when we include them with the previous highest abundant element like helium. And include say nitrogen with carbon and include fluorine with oxygen. In this manner of tampering by inclusion we then obtain a smooth curve
graph such as the Rayleigh-Jeans graph. And we account for that inclusion process by saying something physical is going on in the neutrons and proton toruses to make the combining a physical feature of the Faraday law and neutron storage of electricity.

So in 2018, I was looking at the full graph of motion R, 1/R and 1/R^2, much as looking at the full graph of Planck's radiation law on page 1096 of a bell shaped graph.

But if I look at one section of that graph-- Rayleigh-Jeans law, I get a similar graph for cosmic abundance of elements.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sunday, November 5, 2023 at 6:31:19 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

Alright, I am going to use Halliday & Resnick, PHYSICS, part 2, extended version, 1986 for graphs of thermodynamics on page 1095, Planck's Radiation Law.

In figure 49-4
The solid curve shows the experimental spectral radiancy for radiation from a cavity at 2000 K. The classical Rayleigh-Jeans law and the Wien law are shown as dashed lines. The shaded bar represents the range of visible wavelengths.
---end quoting H&R page 1096 ---

The Rayleigh-Jeans law is very much the same as the Cosmic Abundance of elements, although it has minor up and downs if we include the odd-numbered elements along with even-numbered elements. And of course a few anomalies, such as 3 lithium Li 57.1
4 beryllium Be 0.73
5 boron B 21.2.

For these anomalies, what happens when we include them with the previous highest abundant element like helium. And include say nitrogen with carbon and include fluorine with oxygen. In this manner of tampering by inclusion we then obtain a smooth curve

graph such as the Rayleigh-Jeans graph. And we account for that inclusion process by saying something physical is going on in the neutrons and proton toruses to make the combining a physical feature of the Faraday law and neutron storage of electricity.

So in 2018, I was looking at the full graph of motion R, 1/R and 1/R^2, much as looking at the full graph of Planck's radiation law on page 1096 of a bell shaped graph.

But if I look at one section of that graph-- Rayleigh-Jeans law, I get a similar graph for cosmic abundance of elements.

Alright, looks like a revision is due for my 2nd published book of science, my massive chemistry textbook of nearly 1300 pages long. Longer than most fake Calculus textbooks of Old Math like that of Stewart's Calculus.

Anyway, I matured somewhat from 2018 in that True Chemistry textbook.

Only with maturity do we understand and gain to see our past ideas in the light of wisdom. What I mean is that my solution for unification of the 4 forces of physics was to pick out the most perfect of those 4, and that naturally was the force that had
the photon-- the most perfect particle or wave of Nature. So I make the EM force be the Unification force, then I take the other forces and multiply them by a factor and call them just a scalar multiple of the Coulomb force. But later on I found that
there never was a strong nuclear force, so there were only 3 forces at play. This comes with maturity. For in the maturity I found the geometry of the interior of atoms-- proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law. So naturally there is no
nucleus and with no nucleus there is no strong-nuclear force. Meaning that Coulomb force is always pure and simple Attraction.

Oh yes, bozos in physics put bar magnets of like poles together thinking aha-- I defeat AP. But they are bozos, for a bozo can never understand that Nature sometimes, not often but sometimes has a concept of "denial of same space occupancy" which to a
bozo is the same as repel, but to the person with logical marbles, the denial is an altogether different concept than repel.

I challenged anyone in physics to an experiment. Take a numerous collection of magnets and throw them all into a box. And the end result is always, a clump stuck together, never a box with magnets spread apart due to repel. And the reason, simple reason
for this, is because there is no repel in Coulomb force. There is Denial of Same Space Occupancy. You have to carefully guide a North to another North to feel this denial, but the stupid bozo thinks it is repel.

Is there a weak nuclear force?? Yes of course and it is radioactive decay. It is an adjustment to the proton torus or muon inside or even an adjustment to the neutrons as parallel plate capacitors. Adjustments in geometry. There is also gravity as a EM
force but gravity is 10^40 weaker than Coulomb.

So the Unification that AP found, is rather ironic, for it was far more difficult to find the unification of the actual 3 forces of physics than to find the Unification of Quantum physics to Thermodynamics, and more broadly unification of Thermodynamics
to all other forms of physics. I say ironic because the unification of thermodynamics to the rest of physics is absolutely and gorgeously simple and easy, compared to unification of the 4 then 3 forces of physics.

So what is the Unification of Thermodynamics to the rest of physics???

It is simply to note that Thermodynamics is a tiny narrow stretch of the EM Spectrum called Infrared waves. To the one side is Visible light. And to the other side is Microwaves then Radio waves.

So basically all of Thermodynamics is a playing around with Infrared Waves of the EM spectrum. Simple as that. Whenever we speak of Heat or 2nd law of thermodynamics or Absolute Zero Kelvin, all we essentially are doing is focusing in on a narrow strip
of the EM spectrum.

While Old Physics as taught in schools now, leave everyone with the impression-- here is main part of physics and over there is Thermodynamics. And in the future, we then teach thermodynamics as if we are playing around with the Infrared region of the
Spectrum.

And so this concept of Dirac New Radioactivities where we start the Universe as dot seed atoms which double then those in turn double with the muon thrusting through proton torus making electricity that is storaged in a neutron that grows from 1 eV up to
945MeV and then becomes a newly manufactured hydrogen atom unto the world.

This is how the Universe grows. It does not start from a Big Bang, nor does it later have Nebular Dust Clouds that condense into a star and planets. No. The creation of stars and planets is the perpetual motion thrusting of muons inside proton toruses.

And the laws of thermodynamics with its graphs of Rayleigh-Jeans law on page 1096 of Halliday & Resnick and its Planck's radiation graph on that same page, a bell shaped curve. Those graphs are thermodynamics and half the graph, as the curve is sharply
descending in Rayleigh-Jeans is the graph of Dirac New Radioactivities which I called RSNM, radioactive spontaneous neutron materialization, all coming from Faraday law of the perpetual motion muon inside the proton torus.

With this new maturity, one must ask the question of is the muon the only perpetual motion machine in all of creation and must seek deep deep philosophical questions and answers. For us, as physicists we have always been negative and wary of claims of
perpetual motion. And after all, perhaps the only real mystery in physics is not the strangeness as Feynman put it-- of the Double Slit Experiment, no, but rather the strangeness that the muon is a perpetual motion machine when inside a proton torus. For
what answers the strangeness of Feynman's Double Slit is the fact that light waves and the monopoles are closed loop circuits not direct straight line arrow rays. Feynman was confused with the strangeness for he believed photons were arrow like rays with
head and tail, but not true, they are circuit loops and that dissolves the strangeness in Double Slit.

Is there something, some concept that AP is missing that would dissolve the perplexing strangeness of a muon having perpetual motion, while all else in the world does not have perpetual motion.

Maybe some more maturity of wisdom will come to me so I can dissolve that strangeness also.

AP, King of Science, especially physics and logic

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

The entire physics subject of Thermodynamics is a small slice of the EM Spectrum-- the Infrared region. And this region has at least 3 laws known as the 3 laws of thermodynamics.

This raises interesting questions on whether a different slice of the EM Spectrum has its well formed Physics subject on par with heat and thermodynamics.

Should we say that the slice of the EM Spectrum that is Visible and UV be the slice of Life, of biology. With its own relevant and pertinant laws but specific to that bandwidth of EM Spectrum.

Should we say the bandwidth of Microwave and Radio waves is a subject matter of Physics with its own specific laws for that slice of the Spectrum. Same question for X-rays and gamma rays at the other end.

So what I am saying here, is that until AP's New Physics, we had Thermodynamics as separate from other Physics, as a independent subject of physics. But now we see Thermodynamics as just a slice of EM Spectrum, and never disconnected.

And already, I see a major Law of the Visible region of the EM Spectrum if we call that region the region of Life. For DNA molecule is the macro molecule for the Light Wave has the same geometry. We simply replace nucleotides on DNA with magnetic field
or electric field. And both are closed loop circuits.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

The entire physics subject of Thermodynamics is a small slice of the EM Spectrum-- the Infrared region. And this region has at least 3 laws known as the 3 laws of thermodynamics.

This raises interesting questions on whether a different slice of the EM Spectrum has its well formed Physics subject on par with heat and thermodynamics.

Should we say that the slice of the EM Spectrum that is Visible and UV be the slice of Life, of biology. With its own relevant and pertinant laws but specific to that bandwidth of EM Spectrum.

Should we say the bandwidth of Microwave and Radio waves is a subject matter of Physics with its own specific laws for that slice of the Spectrum. Same question for X-rays and gamma rays at the other end.

So what I am saying here, is that until AP's New Physics, we had Thermodynamics as separate from other Physics, as a independent subject of physics. But now we see Thermodynamics as just a slice of EM Spectrum, and never disconnected.

And already, I see a major Law of the Visible region of the EM Spectrum if we call that region the region of Life. For DNA molecule is the macro molecule for the Light Wave has the same geometry. We simply replace nucleotides on DNA with magnetic field
or electric field. And both are closed loop circuits.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

So the mathematical graph I need for the Cosmic Abundance of Elements is this half U shaped type of curve.

Where it starts enormously high in abundance with hydrogen and helium, then descends rapidly to near zero hugging the x-axis.

It looks like this, half of a steep bell shape curve.

\__

And there is a curve that looks like that in classical physics. It is called the Rayleigh-Jeans law and graphed curve.

I am learning it for the first time as our physics class in late 1969 never dwelled on it. We learned the Planck Radiation law and did not bother with the historical lead up to the Planck Radiation law.

I am learning that the Rayleigh-Jeans law was part of the Ultraviolet Catastrophe.

But now, that I am picking up on the mathematics of Cosmic Abundance of Elements, I do not recognize any such thing as a Ultraviolet Catastrophe, saying that the Rayleigh-Jeans law is rather, best suited for chemical element abundance than is anything of
the bell shaped curves of Planck Radiation law.

Here I have the mathematics of (2cK_B*T) / wavelength^4.

Here, what I intend to do is see if I can link up the cosmic abundance of chemical elements with a analog formula of the Rayleigh-Jeans formula. It certainly would save me tremendous time in trying to construct a formula from scratch-nothing.

Here is that chart of abundance that I am trying to mimic. To make it easy I will clump together in a packet helium,lithium,beryllium, boron. Then clump together carbon,nitrogen, oxygen. Then clump together flourine,neon,sodium, magnesium. To make a
smooth curve.

Atoms/10^6 Si
1 hydrogen H 2.79 x 10^10
2 helium He 2.72 x 10^9
3 lithium Li 57.1
4 beryllium Be 0.73
5 boron B 21.2
6 carbon C 1.01 x 10^7
7 nitrogen N 3.13 x 10^6
8 oxygen O 2.38 x 10^7
9 fluorine F 843
10 neon Ne 3.44 x 10^6
11 sodium Na 5.74 x 10^4
12 magnesium Mg 1.074 x 10^6
13 aluminum Al 8.49 x 10^4
14 silicon Si 1.00 x 10^6
15 phosphorus P 1.04 x 10^4
16 sulfur S 5.15 x 10^5
17 chlorine Cl 5240
18 argon Ar 1.01 x 10^5
19 potassium K 3770
20 calcium Ca 6.11 x 10^4
21 scandium Sc 34.2
22 titanium Ti 2400
23 vanadium V 293
24 chromium Cr 1.35 x 10^4
25 manganese Mn 9550
26 iron Fe 9.00 x 10^5
27 cobalt Co 2250
28 nickel N 4.93 x 10^4
29 copper Cu 522
30 zinc Zn 1260
31 gallium Ga 37.8
32 germanium Ge 119
33 arsenic As 6.56
34 selenium Se 62.1
35 bromine Br 11.8
36 krypton Kr 45
37 rubidium Rb 7.09
38 strontium Sr 23.5
39 yttrium Y 4.64
40 zirconium Zr 11.4
41 niobium Nb 0.698
42 molybdenum Mo 2.55
43 technetium Tc
44 ruthenium Ru 1.86
45 rhodium Rh 0.344
46 palladium Pd 1.39
47 silver Ag 0.486
48 cadmium Cd 1.61
49 indium In 0.184
50 tin Sn 3.82
51 antimony Sb 0.309
52 tellurium Te 4.81
53 iodine I 0.90
54 xenon Xe 4.7
55 cesium Cs 0.372
56 barium Ba 4.49
57 lanthanum La 0.4460
58 cerium Ce 1.136
59 praseodymium Pr 0.1669
60 neodymium Nd 0.8279
61 promethium Pm
62 samarium Sm 0.2582
63 europium Eu 0.0973
64 gadolinium Gd 0.3300
65 terbium Tb 0.0603
66 dysprosium Dy 0.3942
67 holmium Ho 0.0889
68 erbium Er 0.2508
69 thulium Tm 0.0378
70 ytterbium Yb 0.2479
71 lutetium Lu 0.0367
72 hafnium Hf 0.154
73 tantalum Ta 0.0207
74 tungsten W 0.133
75 rhenium Re 0.0517
76 osmium Os 0.675
77 iridium Ir 0.661
78 platinum Pt 1.34
79 gold Au 0.187
80 mercury Hg 0.34
81 thallium TL 0.184
82 lead Pb 3.15
83 bismuth Bi 0.144
84 polonium Po
85 astatine At
86 radon Rn
87 francium Fr
88 radium Ra
89 actinium Ac
90 thorium Th 0.0335
91 protoactinium Pa
92 uranium U 0.0090
93 neptunium Np
94 plutonium Pu

What I am doing here is establishing how the matter in the universe is created through the passage of time by muons thrusting inside proton toruses producing electricity which is often storaged in neutrons growing from 1eV to 945MeV and thus creating
hydrogen or heavier element isotopes.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Alright, I am going to try to correlate wavelength of spectral lines for all chemical elements as being hydrogen atom multiples.

So that the Rayleigh-Jeans graph is the cosmic abundance of chemical elements graph.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, November 7, 2023 at 4:37:21 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

Alright, I am going to try to correlate wavelength of spectral lines for all chemical elements as being hydrogen atom multiples.

So that the Rayleigh-Jeans graph is the cosmic abundance of chemical elements graph.

Alright, what do I need to say, that the Rayleigh-Jeans graph as shown in Halliday & Resnick is actually the same graph as the Cosmic Abundance of Elements, starting with Hydrogen.

Do I have to equate wavelength in Blackbody radiation to be quantity of hydrogen atoms?

I know all elements have Unique Spectral Lines. Is there something in the uniqueness of spectral lines that I can point to and say-- ah yes, hydrogen is abundant as Atoms/10^6 Si
1 hydrogen H 2.79 x 10^10
2 helium He 2.72 x 10^9

And because of the spectral lines of helium, it is abundant as 2.72*10^9.

When I was toying with this question in 2018, I was toying with Motion compared to abundance and not thermodynamics.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, November 8, 2023 at 1:15:43 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

On Tuesday, November 7, 2023 at 4:37:21 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

Alright, I am going to try to correlate wavelength of spectral lines for all chemical elements as being hydrogen atom multiples.

So that the Rayleigh-Jeans graph is the cosmic abundance of chemical elements graph.

Alright, what do I need to say, that the Rayleigh-Jeans graph as shown in Halliday & Resnick is actually the same graph as the Cosmic Abundance of Elements, starting with Hydrogen.

Do I have to equate wavelength in Blackbody radiation to be quantity of hydrogen atoms?

I know all elements have Unique Spectral Lines. Is there something in the uniqueness of spectral lines that I can point to and say-- ah yes, hydrogen is abundant as Atoms/10^6 Si
1 hydrogen H 2.79 x 10^10
2 helium He 2.72 x 10^9
And because of the spectral lines of helium, it is abundant as 2.72*10^9.

When I was toying with this question in 2018, I was toying with Motion compared to abundance and not thermodynamics.

Alright, I finally have this solved. It should have been immediate to me, but rather, it took several days.

In physics we have velocity = distance/time.

We can rewrite that as velocity = distance x frequency.

We can rewrite that as speed of light = constant = wavelength x frequency.

We can see that Permeability x Permittivity is a analog of wavelengh x frequency.

We know Planck's constant is 4.1*10^-15 eV*seconds.

---quoting from my 260th published book of science "A list of discovered and derived constants of Physics and Mathematics// math-physics
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)" ---


The Divisional Inverse Technique is what one can think of as being-- a Physics Constant in the large scale as in astronomy or physics at large, has the same physics constant on the microscope scale. For example, the time it takes for a hydrogen atom to
reproduce itself by its muon thrusting through its proton of 840 windings (proton is 840MeV) as a torus coil in Faraday law is 132,000,000 years which in seconds is 1.32*10^8 * (3.1*10^7) = 4.1*10^15 seconds. And thus, the discreteness of the Atom in
Planck's constant is 4.1*10^-15 eV*seconds. Special note:: AP gets 3.1*10^7 as the amount of seconds in a single year.

Deriving Planck's constant from the mere idea of the doubling of hydrogen atom systems.

Planck's constant is 4.1*10^-15 eV*seconds.
The Divisional Inverse of Planck's constant is 4.1*10^15, numerically. And when you multiply 1.32 *10^8 years by 3.1*10^7 seconds in a year you get 4.1*10^15.

--- end quoting from my 260th book of science ---

We know Thermodynamics with its Planck Constant is only a small part of the EM spectrum-- the infrared region of the spectrum. And thus we know that a law like speed of light is proportional to Permeability x Permittivity, that the abundance of Chemical
Elements is based on such a proportionality such as (abundance of hydrogen x abundance of silicon) is a constant.

For example 2.79 *10^10 x 1*10^6 = 2.79*10^16. Now we take the Divisional Constant is that divided into 1.

1/ 2.79*10^16 = 0.367*10^-15 = 3.67*10^-16

The speed of light involves permeability x permittivity

--- quoting 260th book ---
In Old Physics they just defined permeability, not measure it from any experiment. They defined it as 1.256*10^-6 N*A^-2, where they simply said it is a coefficient of 4pi = 12.56 then 1.256 *10. That is rather hypocritical of scientists to grasp out of
thin air 4pi. They did measure permittivity at 8.854*10^-12 F*m^-1.
--- end quoting 260th b

All day long, I was trying to think of a Law of Optics that has the pattern of AxB = C where we have 10^6 x 10^12 = 10^18 or 10^-6 x 10^-12 = 10^-18 similar to permeability x permittivity.

And no success until now.

I suspect we can call the process of photosynthesis a Law of Physics. Hardly much different than the Planck radiation law.

And perhaps in a very good sense, photosynthesis is blackbody physics in biology.

For the plants on Earth, for the most part take in the red wavelength and blue and UV wavelength but do not accept the green wavelength.

The last episode in Ancient Earth talks about the Green Planet. Ironic that it should be called the Blue Planet for that is where photosynthesis takes place most.

The green color is what plants discard.

It would be like saying-- ignore the living animal and focus on the animal discard-- scats and urine, as to say plants are green the discarded light.

So having a look at the EM Spectrum for Visible and UV we have wavelengths in 10^-6 meters and frequency in 10^14 Hz.

I suppose whenever Photosynthesis takes place, we are having Spectral Line physics taking place.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Alright the human body of 70kg roughly has 7*10^27 atoms. I am looking for 10^18 where 10^6 x 10^12 is associated with mRNA and DNA.

What I am looking for is the relationship of 10^6 x 10^12. I believe mRNA is 10^6 and DNA is 10^12. If I can make that link up then I will have connected Planck's constant with speed of light with photosynthesis and with mRNA-DNA.

So I am looking for number of atoms in mRNA-DNA or number of nucleotides or perhaps chemical bonds in mRNA-DNA.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 1:44:01 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

Alright the human body of 70kg roughly has 7*10^27 atoms. I am looking for 10^18 where 10^6 x 10^12 is associated with mRNA and DNA.

What I am looking for is the relationship of 10^6 x 10^12. I believe mRNA is 10^6 and DNA is 10^12. If I can make that link up then I will have connected Planck's constant with speed of light with photosynthesis and with mRNA-DNA.

So I am looking for number of atoms in mRNA-DNA or number of nucleotides or perhaps chemical bonds in mRNA-DNA.

Trying to get data on weight mass of DNA, RNA. Ran into "daltons".

The mRNA typically weighs 10^-18 grams while the DNA weighs 10^-12 grams.
And although backwards, this is what I was looking for in terms of A x B = C where we have 10^6 x 10^12 = 10^18.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Alright this is incredibly exciting physics. I have not been so excited about physics in years, going back to 2016-17 when I discovered the proton had to be 840MeV as a proton torus with the real electron of atoms as the muon inside the torus doing the
Faraday law.

What is so exciting here, is that I am tying together thermodynamics, speed of light, Planck's constant, photosynthesis, DNA, and the Cosmic Abundance of Chemical Elements. Imagine that, the rate at which light moves is tied to how much silicon and
hydrogen exist in the world. The process of DNA and photosynthesis is directly related to how much carbon and oxygen exist in the Cosmos.

This indicates the Universe is a symphony orchestra, all playing together in tandem. And the universe is not separate one act plays here and there, no, the universe is a one symphony orchestra with one show going on.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Alright, I am getting ready to start writing this book, as I feel I have enough information.

One idea that struck me about recounting how Earth got its atmosphere is an idea I read as a teenager in a science paperback book. It was a thick book, but I came across a passage where the author/s were trying to make a effort to inform the reader of
how big a number like 1 billion years was, and Earth being 4.5 billion years old. So the authors start by saying you have a mountain, say Mount Rainer and you have a bird that lands every year on the top of this Mt. Rainer and sharpens its beak. So the
authors were wanting to impress the reader of how big 1 billion years was. So once a year and every year this bird lands on Mt.Rainer and sharpens its beak. By the end of 1 billion years, the Mt.Rainer would no longer exist because of this bird
sharpening its beak once a year.

As a youth I was impressed but now in being in science myself, I do not like the story. I prefer something better to impress a reader of how big that 1 billion years is. Something better.

And the best impression of 1 billion years is the Doubling math effect. Actually, my preference for doubling is more about how fantastic doubling becomes than about how impressive is the big number of a billion years.

So in my recent book of Constants, my 260th published book I have this chart.


Number of Hydrogen atoms       Doubling time interval     Math form

1                                        t_0           2^0
2                                       t_1               2^1
4                                       t_2               2^2
8                                       t_3               2^3
16                                     t_4               2^4
32                                     t_5               2^5
.                                          .                   .
.                                          .                    .
1,073,741,824                  t_30             2^30
2,147,483,648                  t_31             2^31
4,294,967,296                  t_32             2^32

So here I want to comment more about the math and physics of doubling than about being impressed by how big is the number of 1 billion years which would be 365*10^9 days approx. or 3.65*10^12 days. That it takes only 30 episodes of doubling to reach a
billion years. And where each episode would correspond based on the above chart to about 140,000,000 as 140 million years. Most geological periods of Earth history are far smaller than 140 million years.

But the subject theme of the NOVA series is the atmosphere of Earth through geological time. And I propose it be taught with Dirac New Radioactivities, not with Old Astronomy and Old Geology fake science of a Nebular Dust Cloud theory of formation of
Earth.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Saturday, November 11, 2023 at 12:02:27 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

Alright, I am getting ready to start writing this book, as I feel I have enough information.

One idea that struck me about recounting how Earth got its atmosphere is an idea I read as a teenager in a science paperback book. It was a thick book, but I came across a passage where the author/s were trying to make a effort to inform the reader of

how big a number like 1 billion years was, and Earth being 4.5 billion years old. So the authors start by saying you have a mountain, say Mount Rainer and you have a bird that lands every year on the top of this Mt. Rainer and sharpens its beak. So the
authors were wanting to impress the reader of how big 1 billion years was. So once a year and every year this bird lands on Mt.Rainer and sharpens its beak. By the end of 1 billion years, the Mt.Rainer would no longer exist because of this bird
sharpening its beak once a year.


Alright, I seemed to have butchered the above teaching aid to impress a student how big is a billion years. For I think it was designed to say once a day a bird lands on the mountain peak and after a billion years, it is reduced to a sand pile.

And I believe I saw this analogy on a TV science show in addition to reading it in a science paperback book in late 1960s.

But I cannot relate to a bird sharpening its beak and how much that would turn rock into sand.

What I can relate to is hauling water out of a lake or ocean in say a 10 liter bucket.

Looking up Wikipedia and they say the combined water in all the oceans is 1.335 sextillion liters.

What is a sextillion, I ask?

Sextillion is 10^18

A billion is 10^9

Now there are 365 days in a year, and 12 hours in a day gives me 4,380 hours. Now there are 60 minutes in a hour gives me 4380 x 60 = 262,800 which in scientific notation is 2.62*10^5. So now I have 10^9 x 2.62*10^5 = 2.62*10^14.

I am short by a factor of 10,000.

But it is too late at night now and will resume tomorrow in finding a better analogy of how big 1 billion years is.

Maybe all the water in the Atlantic Ocean alone or the Pacific Ocean alone?

And perhaps I can do an analogy on human population, since that is now 8 billion humans on planet Earth. Here I can say a billion years is 3.65*10^11 days and the human population is 8*10^9 persons. Say I spent 45.6 days with each human on Earth then
that would be a billion years.

That is an impressive analogy, and who would want to spend almost 46 days with every single human being, sounds like a recipe for going crazy.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Saturday, November 11, 2023 at 2:34:30 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

What I can relate to is hauling water out of a lake or ocean in say a 10 liter bucket.

Looking up Wikipedia and they say the combined water in all the oceans is 1.335 sextillion liters.

What is a sextillion, I ask?

Sextillion is 10^18

A billion is 10^9

Now there are 365 days in a year, and 24 hours in a day gives me 8,760 hours. Now there are 60 minutes in a hour and 60 seconds in a minute gives me 3600, and now 8760 x 3600 = 3.15*10^7. So now I have 10^9 x 3.15*10^7 = 3.15*10^16.

I am short by a factor of 100. I have the time now in seconds. What measure of time is below seconds? I need 1/100 of a second. It is called a Centisecond. Wikipedia says the centisecond is the human reflex response to visual stimuli. And the cycle

time for European 50 Hz of AC electricity. Now 1/1000 of a second is the time for a neuron in human brain to fire one impulse and return to rest.

So in this analogy, I am also seeking a A * B = C of 10^6 x 10^12 = 10^18 that conforms with my program of speed of light by permeability x permittivity.

And so now I have the analogy I want and like-- me taking 1 liter of water out of the oceans in a Centisecond for 1 billion years will empty all the ocean water on Earth.

And this analogy will serve to explain that by Dirac New Radioactivities, all the water on planet Earth was formed by Dirac New Radioactivities just as all the mass on Earth was formed by Dirac New Radioactivities and we need no water from comets to make
Earth water rich.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Alright this is a good analogy for teaching how long 1 billion years is. For in the analogy we teach not only appreciation of the time span that 1 billion years moves through, but how Earth gained all its water from the muon thrusting through the proton
torus of every proton that was Earth in its 4.5 billion year history.

In other words, we need no comets to feed Earth with water, it builds water by itself in Faraday law of muon thrusting through proton torus.

And we begin to see and question the stupidity of the Nebular Dust Cloud theory, for how in the world do you get 4 Gas Giants with all that gas in a Nebular Dust Cloud.

How does Earth get all that oxygen and hydrogen to make oceans in a Nebular Dust Cloud. There are so so many contradictions with a Nebular Dust Cloud theory and the actual data and facts on the 4 terrestrial planets and the 4 gas giant planets. To create
4 terrestrial and 4 gas giant planets you need a mechanism of element creation that is uniform mechanism-- such as every proton with muon inside is creating and forging new elements as the creation process.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

I dare say, but probably highly true, that the Nebular Dust Cloud theory of Earth and Sun and its planets theory was never challenged. Simply because there were no alternative theories for the Solar System creation.

When you have a theory with no challengers, you then tend to never look at the contradictions of the Nebular Dust Cloud theory. Contradictions such as gas inclusions in heavier compounds. Such as why 4 gas giants preceded by 4 terrestrial planets. Why
does Venus and Earth have so much atmosphere yet Mars almost none.

When you have a competing theory for Solar System creation such as AP's growing Earth theory based on Dirac New Radioactivities of muon inside every proton torus creating new electricity via Faraday law, then this competing theory starts to ask these
contradictory questions of the Nebular Dust Cloud hocus pocus.

In the AP theory of Solar System the Sun starts to grow from a seed cluster of atoms, doubling every 132,000,000 years to grow Earth from a single atom. In this growing process there are patterns. The Sun is like a Spectral Line of Space, where you have
4 main spectral lines coinciding with Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune. The Chemical Elements have 4 main spectral lines and then 4 minor spectral lines. The minor spectral lines coincide with Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars.

When the Sun was borne from this cluster of seed atoms and then doubled every 132,000,000 years, it had a magnetic field in a plane in Space. We call this the Sun's ecliptic plane. The planets were borne in this ecliptic plane from seed atoms and
received electricity from the Sun to hold these planets in their magnetic field track. Electricity from the Sun that shoots electricity aft of the planet pushing it in the track and electricity fore of the planet pulling it in the Sun magnetic field
track.

Some tracks like the Gas Giant planets receive the most electricity from the Sun and thus they grow to be gas giant planets. These 4 tracks are the main spectral lines of the Solar System.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

In my 26th published book of science I wrote the main objection to the Nebular Dust Cloud theory is the scarcity of Supernova, even Nova. Yet stars with planets are almost everywhere. But in the NOVA series, the theme is atmosphere, and here my task is
to find contradictions in atmosphere with the Nebular Dust Cloud theory.

--- quoting my 26th published book ---

AP-Faraday Law replacing Nebular Dust Cloud theory (Physics series for High School Book 3)
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)


Last revision was April 2023. This is AP's 26th published book of science.

Preface: When I first published this book in 2019, unfortunately it was not on the level of High School students comprehension. I have to tone it down for these young minds to learn what it is I am saying. So I make a massive overhaul revision that the
High School students can grasp fully the ideas. This is a huge benefit of electronic book publishing in that a author can test his book and see if students comprehend the materials. Unfortunately for this book published in 2019 was far over the heads of
High School students and now I correct that problem. In 2019 I was running a marathon of science book publishing, for college students mostly and unfortunately that college book writing seeped into this High School book.
Revising my 26th book o

Looking through the literature on contradictions of the Nebular Dust Cloud theory and specifically for atmospheres of planets.

I found many websites. The two I picked to quote state the massive problem and contradiction that the Sun has tiny angular momentum and most of the mass, while the planets, especially the 4 gas giant planets contain much of the angular momentum of the
solar system. If the Solar System formed from a Dust Cloud, you would expect the Sun to have most of the angular momentum.

But if you see the formation of the Solar System as from Dirac New Radioactivities by the AP mechanism of muon thrusting inside a proton torus and producing new electricity which grows a neutron from 1 eV to 945MeV, and thus creates new atoms, then we
bypass the contradiction of Nebular Dust Cloud theory.

--- quoting Britannica on contradiction of Nebular theory ---
Laplace’s model led naturally to the observed result of planets revolving around the Sun in the same plane and in the same direction as the Sun rotates. Because the theory of Laplace incorporated Kant’s idea of planets coalescing from dispersed
material, their two approaches are often combined in a single model called the Kant-Laplace nebular hypothesis. This model for solar system formation was widely accepted for about 100 years. During this period, the apparent regularity of motions in the
solar system was contradicted by the discovery of asteroids with highly eccentric orbits and moons with retrograde orbits. Another problem with the nebular hypothesis was the fact that, whereas the Sun contains 99.9 percent of the mass of the solar
system, the planets (principally the four giant outer planets) carry more than 99 percent of the system’s angular momentum. For the solar system to conform to this theory, either the Sun should be rotat

Alright, what destroys the Nebular Dust Cloud theory without considering the atmosphere of planets is the problem of angular momentum is 99% in the gas giants when it should be 99% in the Sun.

What destroys the Nebular Dust Cloud theory ___with considering the atmospheres of planets___ is how can physics keep together a cloud of gases and have each gas giant planet along with the Sun condense. In the literature is this idea of a "shock wave"
as condensing a Dust Cloud to be a star, but how does this shock wave condense planets, let alone how does a dust cloud hold together gas atoms and gas molecules. The only means of physics condensing out a gas cloud is when it is thrust into a freezing
chamber of near 0 Kelvin degrees.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

So the logic of this-- of trashcanning the silly Nebular Dust Cloud theory as the origins of our Solar System is quite clear. (1) The angular momentum of Sun versus gas giants is reversed, where 99% is in the gas giants and only 1% in the Sun (2) and
then for the atmospheres, there are no laws of physics that can shoot out a nova or supernova material of gases which condense coalesce into gas giant planets in such a tidy math distance of the Titius-Bode Rule.

Now some are arguing that the new reports of exoplanets with huge Jupiters orbiting their stars as new evidence of the failings of Nebular Dust Cloud theory but I would caution against this. I believe these exoplanets exist, but astronomers of this time
are still far far in the weeds of lack of commonsense. They still buy and believe in Doppler Redshift as a distance measure, and who knows how many times they apply the Doppler Redshift nonsense to distance measure. So the star could well have a
exoplanet and be the size of Jupiter, but only a daft and silly person would believe a daft and silly astronomer with his/her exoplanet based on Doppler Redshift applications.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sunday, November 12, 2023 at 6:21:32 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

So the logic of this-- of trashcanning the silly Nebular Dust Cloud theory as the origins of our Solar System is quite clear. (1) The angular momentum of Sun versus gas giants is reversed, where 99% is in the gas giants and only 1% in the Sun (2) and

then for the atmospheres, there are no laws of physics that can shoot out a nova or supernova material of gases which condense coalesce into gas giant planets in such a tidy math distance of the Titius-Bode Rule.

Now some are arguing that the new reports of exoplanets with huge Jupiters orbiting their stars as new evidence of the failings of Nebular Dust Cloud theory but I would caution against this. I believe these exoplanets exist, but astronomers of this

time are still far far in the weeds of lack of commonsense. They still buy and believe in Doppler Redshift as a distance measure, and who knows how many times they apply the Doppler Redshift nonsense to distance measure. So the star could well have a
exoplanet and be the size of Jupiter, but only a daft and silly person would believe a daft and silly astronomer with his/her exoplanet based on Doppler Redshift applications.



However, I am cautious on evidence of (1) Angular momentum where Sun has 1% of Solar System angular momentum and gas giants have 99%. Cautious in that in AP EM Equations, the angular momentum of Electric field of a astro body increases with satellites
that revolve around it. So that Mercury and Venus have no satellites and therefore, their rotation equals their revolution. Jupiter and the other gas giants all have large numbers of satellites, all of which contribute to faster rotation. And the Sun
has many satellites-- all its planets. But still there is a discrepancy if you believe in the Nebular Dust Cloud theory, a discrepancy of angular momentum.

So I am going to ponder and ponder on which of these two contradictions takes the greater weight of dismissal of Nebular theory.

I think one fault of this theory is that some astronomers see a cloud in the cosmic skies, and they think they see a new star formed in that cloud and base a entire theory around that observation. And another fault line is that the origin of the Solar
System never had a competing theory. Once a theory has a rival theory, then things really go into action about whether the Nebular theory is trash.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Alright, I am going to start writing this 262nd book of mine of science.

NOVA did a appallingly bad job of "Ancient Earth" series. I say appallingly because they abandoned the "method of science" by having a axe to grind and sharpen with their propaganda of CO2 global warming. And how stupid and silly to juxtapose CO2 gas
into Permian extinction, even into Snowball Earth, the dinosaur extinction in late Cretaceous, all because some feeble minded scientists want to emphasis "CO2". This is not science, but propaganda.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Friday, November 3, 2023 at 7:38:41 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

(snipped)
The Faraday Law inside of each atom is a doubling over time of that same atom of hydrogen. So at t_0 we have one atom of hydrogen and at t_1 we have 2 atoms of hydrogen, and at the same interval of time t_2 we doubled the 2 to be 4 now. So a doubling

in physics. So we write out a chart.

Number of Hydrogen atoms Doubling time interval Math form
1 t_0 2^0
2 t_1 2^1
4 t_2 2^2
8 t_3 2^3
16 t_4 2^4
32 t_5 2^5
. . .
. . .
1,073,741,824 t_30 2^30
2,147,483,648 t_31 2^31
4,294,967,296 t_32 2^32

Now I stop there because it is nearby to the total time covered of 4,500,000,000

And here is where I divide that time of Earth existence by the number 32 in order to get what the doubling time interval is all about.

4,500,000,000/ 32 = approximately 140,000,000

So my time interval in Nature for a hydrogen atom to double itself by Faraday law electricity going on inside the hydrogen atom is approximately 140 million years of a time interval. Every hydrogen atom in Nature, in the Universe doubles itself in 140

million years.


Now, let me make a new and different Table based on squaring, the Psi squared of quantum mechanics.



Psi-squared time interval
10 t_0
10^2 t_1
10^4 t_2
10^8 t_3
10^16 t_4
10^32 t_5
10^64
10^128
10^256
10^512



AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

So now, let me make a new and different Table based on squaring, the Psi squared of quantum mechanics.

Psi-squared......... time interval
10................................ t_1
10^2 .............................t_2
10^4............................. t_3
10^8............................. t_4
10^16........................... t_5
10^32........................... t_6
10^64............................t_7
10^128..........................t_8
10^256..........................t_9
10^512..........................t_10

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

I wish everyday I could do an experiment in physics. And today was one of those days.

I am measuring the area of Magnetic Field.

So I have a plastic container of iron filings and several different magnets. And was curious to see how much surface area the magnet could attract iron filings. I took a 1cm square area of a magnet and was able to lift and hold a area of 5 x 5 cm of iron
filings.

Now I wanted to check those numbers to that of Earth's own Magnetic Field and they appear to agree.

For the Earths diameter is 12,000 km and the Earth's magnetic field in Space is 60,000 km (sunward side).

So a ratio of 1 to 5 for magnetic field.

Where am I going with this??? You may well ask.

I have been in Physics long enough to know that the details and descriptions of physics can be presented by duality parameters.

In the above tables of Time of Doubling marking out the growth of stars and planets as that of doubling from the muon thrusting through proton torus and doubling in mass every 132,000,000 to 140,000,000 years.

But the second table above is a exponent doubling 10 to 100 to 10000 to 100000000 etc.

Now my doubling to create Sun and planets is off by some amount. If we believe Earth is exactly 4.6 billion years old, and when I got this 4,294,967,296 t_32 2^32 which is only 4.2 billion years old, so somewhere between t_32 and t_33 do we actually
cross into 4.6 billion years.

Now the other Table is about Psi -squared of quantum mechanics and is a probability parameter-- of how likely one is to encounter a wave in Space.

I am the author that Infinity borderline for math and physics is 10^604. Our math stops at 10^604 as being reliable for that is infinity borderline.

Now what is the ratio of difference of 4.2 billion years as compared to 4.6 billion years and that of 10^512 and 10^604??? Are they comparable in differences of sigma error. Of course, one is a number and the other is a exponent in comparison. So I
compare 4.2/4.6 = 91% while 512/604 = 84%. Actually not a bad comparison, for I was expecting far worse of a gap.

To make a long story short, I am looking at the doubling for creation of planet Earth as a electric field. While I am looking at the doubling of exponent in Magnetic field as a Psi-squared. I am saying that electricity is mass particles even stars and
planets, while Magnetic field is Space itself as Psi-squared.

We do not often ask "What is Space", and assume it is a empty container for which particles and waves travel or lie within that Space. Here I am saying electricity forms particles and closed loop circuits, and that Magnetism forms Space. I am arguing
that when we speak of a Magnetic field, we are saying the same thing as Space itself. Whenever we use space in science, we can replace it with magnetic field.

And through those two tables above, I am hopeful of drawing them closer together such as Permeability X Permittivity is the factor of the Speed of Light. Magnetic field X Electric field is proportional to 10^6 x 10^12 = 10^18.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Some formulas first.

Sphere volume 4/3(pi)radius^3

Circle area (pi) radius^2

Circle circumference (pi) diameter

Currently at the moment I am doing Grid Graphing in sci.math with only straightedge and compass, a favorite pasttime in Ancient Greek times.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 5:09:25 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

Some formulas first.

Sphere volume 4/3(pi)radius^3

Circle area (pi) radius^2

Circle circumference (pi) diameter

Currently at the moment I am doing Grid Graphing in sci.math with only straightedge and compass, a favorite pasttime in Ancient Greek times.

What I am on about here is this beautiful math of speed of light a constant. That constant comes from two numbers 10^6 and 10^12 in multiplication.

Specifically from my 260th book of science.

--- quoting from my 260th book of science ---
In Old Physics they just defined permeability, not measure it from any experiment. They defined it as 1.256*10^-6 N*A^-2, where they simply said it is a coefficient of 4pi = 12.56 then 1.256 *10. That is rather hypocritical of scientists to grasp out of
thin air 4pi. They did measure permittivity at 8.854*10^-12 F*m^-1.

In Old Physics they did this.
So if we plug into this formula
c = 1/sqrt(permittivity*permeability)
c = 1/sqrt(8.854*10^-12 * 1.256*10^-6)
c = 1/sqrt(11.12*10^-18)
c = 1/ 3.334*10^-18 s/m
c = 0.299*10^9 m/s
c = 2.99*10^8 m/s

In New Physics we take a different approach of defining permeability by a probability Fibonacci sequence where we can have north pole then south pole arbitrarily picked. This leads to a special math constant of 1.131...

New Physics 
c = 1/sqrt(permittivity*permeability)
c = 1/sqrt(8.85*10^-12 * 1.13*10^-6)
c = 1/sqrt(10.000*10^-18)
c = 1/ 3.16*10^-18 s/m
c = 0.316*10^9 m/s
c = 3.16*10^8 m/s
--- end

So, I am faced with a mathematics of A X A^2 = A^3, such as in the speed of light is permeability x permittivity of a math form of 10^6 x 10^12 = 10^18. That geometry is precisely a cube with side 10^6.

Can that geometry be a sphere volume also?

Sphere volume inscribed inside of Cube of side 2 is 2x2x2 = 8 volume. The sphere volume is when taking pi =3 is radius^3 is equal to 4 or 50% of cube's volume.

Sphere surface area inscribed inside of Cube of side 2 is 4(pi)radius^2 and taking pi =3 we have 12. While the cube surface area is 6 x 4 = 25. Again a 50% relationship.

The Circle area inscribed inside a Square of side 2 is (taking pi to be 3) is 3, while the square area is 4, and so in terms of area the circle is 75% of square.

The Circle circumference inscribed inside a Square of side 2 is (taking pi to be 3) is 6, while the perimeter of square is 8 with is again 75% of square.

Now, let us do the same thing above only figuring out the volume, surface area, area, periment of cube, square inscribed inside the sphere then circle.

Sphere volume circumscribing cube inside is 8 volume and the cube volume. Here I need a face-diagonal is sqrt2, cube diagonal is 2 same as sphere diameter, and find side of cube as S. So I have (sqrt2*S)^2 + S^2 = 2^2. I end up with 2S^2 + S^2 = 4 then
3S^2 = 4 and finally S^2 = 4/3 = 2/sqrt3. Volume of this smaller cube inside of sphere is (2/sqrt3)^3 = about 1.5 for a percentage of 1.5/8 = 18%.

I am looking for a connection here. Perhaps if I try some other figure related to cube that can give me 50% inside the sphere. To late tonight and pick this up tomorrow, going to bed with the pondering why the cube inside is not a 50% of sphere.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Alright I had a late night snooze and back at it.

I should start lower down than volume. I should start with area Circle = pi* r^2 and for Square= side^2.

So I know that given any circle circumscribed inside a square with side 2 then construct the inscribed square inside the circle, its side will become sqrt2 and end up being half the area of larger outer square.

In a sense, the circle plays the role of mediating the large square and finds the 1/2 square.

Now I am looking for a similar geometry pattern for Torus, and a mediator.

Another mediator is the circle with cylinder.

Now if a cylinder can be mediated by a circle, the cylinder is considered to be the Straightline Geometry of the Torus. To uncurl a torus to become a cylinder.

So I want some mediator mathematics geometry of square and torus.

And the reason I want this is because of this Super super important math-physics of A x A^2 = A^3.

Perhaps as important as the super important Pythagorean theorem is for mathematics.

The AxA^2 =A^3 is directly involved in the Speed of Light of Permeability x Permittivity becomes the speed of light. What I would call the Pythagorean theorem of Physics.

So now, let us just take another peek at the EM Spectrum of wavelength X frequency. I like to use frequency instead of saying distance/time, where frequency is 1/time allowing us to dismiss division and go straight into multiplication speed of light =
wavelength x frequency. And no matter where we look at the EM spectrum the multiplication ends up with a Constant speed. Britannica shows the table in centimeters so if the wavelength is 10^-15 wavelength the frequency in hertz is 10^25 for gamma rays.
If the wavelength is visible light 10^-5, then the frequency has to be 10^15 hertz to keep light speed constant. In both cases multiply then gives 10^10.

And now I am looking for the geometry that matches this multiplication constancy.

One geometry is the logarithmic spiral of constant angle. But the trouble with the log spiral is that it is not a container suitable for a perpetual motion muon doing the Faraday law. A torus is suitable, and in fact the only geometry I can think of that
is a container for perpetual motion.

But the geometry of A x A^2 = A^3 is a cube container.

So what I am trying to do is remake or remodel the torus to be a cube.

The Old Math formula of torus volume is (2pi^2)*r^2*R, and surface area is (4pi^2)*r*R.

If nothing else, I can always take cubes and model a torus only with a lot of gaps, to form a crude torus.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 3:55:42 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

Alright I had a late night snooze and back at it.

I should start lower down than volume. I should start with area Circle = pi* r^2 and for Square= side^2.

So I know that given any circle circumscribed inside a square with side 2 then construct the inscribed square inside the circle, its side will become sqrt2 and end up being half the area of larger outer square.

In a sense, the circle plays the role of mediating the large square and finds the 1/2 square.

Now I am looking for a similar geometry pattern for Torus, and a mediator.

Another mediator is the circle with cylinder.

Now if a cylinder can be mediated by a circle, the cylinder is considered to be the Straightline Geometry of the Torus. To uncurl a torus to become a cylinder.

So I want some mediator mathematics geometry of square and torus.

And the reason I want this is because of this Super super important math-physics of A x A^2 = A^3.

Perhaps as important as the super important Pythagorean theorem is for mathematics.

The AxA^2 =A^3 is directly involved in the Speed of Light of Permeability x Permittivity becomes the speed of light. What I would call the Pythagorean theorem of Physics.

So now, let us just take another peek at the EM Spectrum of wavelength X frequency. I like to use frequency instead of saying distance/time, where frequency is 1/time allowing us to dismiss division and go straight into multiplication speed of light =

wavelength x frequency. And no matter where we look at the EM spectrum the multiplication ends up with a Constant speed. Britannica shows the table in centimeters so if the wavelength is 10^-15 wavelength the frequency in hertz is 10^25 for gamma rays.
If the wavelength is visible light 10^-5, then the frequency has to be 10^15 hertz to keep light speed constant. In both cases multiply then gives 10^10.

And now I am looking for the geometry that matches this multiplication constancy.

One geometry is the logarithmic spiral of constant angle. But the trouble with the log spiral is that it is not a container suitable for a perpetual motion muon doing the Faraday law. A torus is suitable, and in fact the only geometry I can think of

that is a container for perpetual motion.

But the geometry of A x A^2 = A^3 is a cube container.

So what I am trying to do is remake or remodel the torus to be a cube.

The Old Math formula of torus volume is (2pi^2)*r^2*R, and surface area is (4pi^2)*r*R.

If nothing else, I can always take cubes and model a torus only with a lot of gaps, to form a crude torus.

It is still an open question for me on how the muon inside a proton torus arranges itself of its 105MeV windings, does it form a small torus thrusting through the proton 840MeV windings large torus, or does the muon take on a closed loop circuit of its
105MeV windings. The only answer I have involves the maximum electricity principle. The configuration whatever it maybe is a configuration that produces maximum electricity.

Have made a little progress on the torus and square. The donut hole is best described as a configuration of this this.

___
)__(

And I would say that is a square with opposite sides right and left as hyperbolic sides.

The normal square is this of course.

___
|__|

And then the cube.

The donut hole of torus of 840 windings has a large torus hole.

In my 205th book of science I found some amazing discoveries that if you take 840 circles that are all the same size, and arranged them into a torus, the diameter of the torus hole is the number pi 3.14....

--- quoting from my 205th book of science "Faraday Law is inverse projective-geometry of Coulomb-gravity Law//Physics-Math"
A fabulous discovery of science physics.

Alright, curiosity in my lifetime has been indefatigable. I wanted to get a rough estimate of the donut hole of 840 windings so I bought 9 more slinky toys to combine with my 2 already owned ones. And I measured what a 840 winding torus donut hole was.
My torus of 840 windings has a donut hole diameter of 210 mm and has a slinky toy diameter of 65mm. That would be a total diameter of torus as 65 + 210 +65 = 340mm with the donut hole diameter 210mm.

Now I play with those numbers and see what becomes of them for the Conjectures I placed so far. The most important being the idea that 840 windings is the physical geometry of the Fine Structure Constant as a torus the produces Maximum Electricity in the
Faraday law.

Alright, well it is easy to see that 210/65 is 3.230... So I went back to the lab and measured again and it was actually 205

Recently I wrote this about DNA with its fabulous twist and base pairs.

Note: DNA molecules and RNA molecules all have rotation angles which consist of the odd number 10.5 in base pairs. The twist angle of 36 degrees corresponds with moving up 5 base pairs to start the cycle over again. And it is highly likely that this 10.5
base pairs twist shows up as 105 MeV for the muon energy.

Surface area of torus (4pi^2)Rr
Volume of torus (2pi^2)Rr^2

This leaves a donut hole for the parallel plate capacitor of a neutron to rest in and above the proton torus.
___
)__(

So what I am working towards is a mingling of the Square figure with the torus figure.

My aim is the equation so persistent in all of physics Permeability X Permittivity = 10^18 or 10^-18. The equation that pervades all of physics A x A^2 = A^3. I know that is a cube in geometry, but is it a torus in geometry also??

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

I am closer to a resolution, and thus a better picture and insight into how new atoms are created in the Universe via Dirac's new radioactivities.

In my recent book on constants, my 260th published book of science.

--- quoting my 260th book "A list of discovered and derived constants of Physics and Mathematics// math-physics by Archimedes Plutonium (Amazon's Kindle) ---
Deriving Planck's constant from the mere idea of the doubling of hydrogen atom systems.

Planck's constant is 4.1*10^-15 eV*seconds.
The Divisional Inverse of Planck's constant is 4.1*10^15, numerically. And when you multiply 1.32 *10^8 years by 3.1*10^7 seconds in a year you get 4.1*10^15.

Most scientists are not accustomed to seeing Planck's constant in EM form, and it is h= 4.135*10^-15 eV*second, or, h-bar = 6.58*10^-16 eV*second. In my above analysis, what I have derived is Planck's constant from the mere idea of the doubling of
hydrogen atom systems, every 132,000,000 years via the Faraday law of a muon thrusting through its proton coil torus producing electricity which after 132 million years duplicate that hydrogen atom. The Planck constant is a rate of duplication of
hydrogen atoms in the universe.

So where do I get 132,000,000 yea