This graph shows on a 30-40 millisecond basis the movement of the entire assembly (closed geometrically, with no exhaust nor any friction drive or external pushback, just a closed body which could be in deep outer space). My PhD research in RMIT
Melbourne (2013-2016) was about the nature of recoil in rail guns. Two US Navy officers in 2007 and 2009 had made a "static" railgun that indicated there was no reaction to the bullet's force, but overall there could be no violation of inertia as the
power supply was on the ground so that could absorb the reaction. In this case the power supply is on the gun, which is of a radically new and far superior design (heavy armature, low voltage, light, efficient by a factor of at least 10) and of course a
working model instead of a static system. I did not get my PhD for they at the final viva did not think I had made a rail gun then, so rejected my thesis. Well, whether I had or not made a working model of a rail gun is also shown in this post! Viewers
can make up their minds!
About the graph, it shows the recoil of the gun, and then how it comes back into a motor mode when the heavy bullet hits the end of the barrel. (Like blocking the barrel of a gun, catching the bullet in it.) Well that is dangerous of course, but here
the speed is not great, the design is robust enough although the edge did fly off and stop the motor a bit prematurely. Still, that did not impac the experimental results which show that without friction and such impact the motor would have gone on for
ever, thus violating inertia, the most sacred principle in both classical and modern physics.


https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=7521409061220159&set=pcb.7521439881217077

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

That the so called Lorentz force accelerating the armature does NOT have an equal and opposite reaction from the current driving it under the dynamic conductor geometry as in the railgun derived motor is a tremendous discovery, equivalent to that of fire
and the wheel.
It directly validates the equation e=0.5mvvN(N-k) that I found back in 1998; it descibes energy creation and destruction, the nature of explosions, and is one basis for faster than light motors.

On Friday, 27 October 2023 at 23:47:20 UTC+11, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

This graph shows on a 30-40 millisecond basis the movement of the entire assembly (closed geometrically, with no exhaust nor any friction drive or external pushback, just a closed body which could be in deep outer space). My PhD research in RMIT

Melbourne (2013-2016) was about the nature of recoil in rail guns. Two US Navy officers in 2007 and 2009 had made a "static" railgun that indicated there was no reaction to the bullet's force, but overall there could be no violation of inertia as the
power supply was on the ground so that could absorb the reaction. In this case the power supply is on the gun, which is of a radically new and far superior design (heavy armature, low voltage, light, efficient by a factor of at least 10) and of course a
working model instead of a static system. I did not get my PhD for they at the final viva did not think I had made a rail gun then, so rejected my thesis. Well, whether I had or not made a working model of a rail gun is also shown in this post! Viewers
can make up their minds!

About the graph, it shows the recoil of the gun, and then how it comes back into a motor mode when the heavy bullet hits the end of the barrel. (Like blocking the barrel of a gun, catching the bullet in it.) Well that is dangerous of course, but here

the speed is not great, the design is robust enough although the edge did fly off and stop the motor a bit prematurely. Still, that did not impac the experimental results which show that without friction and such impact the motor would have gone on for
ever, thus violating inertia, the most sacred principle in both classical and modern physics.

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=7521409061220159&set=pcb.7521439881217077

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Saturday, 28 October 2023 at 08:39:05 UTC+11, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

That the so called Lorentz force accelerating the armature does NOT have an equal and opposite reaction from the current driving it under the dynamic conductor geometry as in the railgun derived motor is a tremendous discovery, equivalent to that of

fire and the wheel.

It directly validates the equation e=0.5mvvN(N-k) that I found back in 1998; it descibes energy creation and destruction, the nature of explosions, and is one basis for faster than light motors.
On Friday, 27 October 2023 at 23:47:20 UTC+11, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

This graph shows on a 30-40 millisecond basis the movement of the entire assembly (closed geometrically, with no exhaust nor any friction drive or external pushback, just a closed body which could be in deep outer space). My PhD research in RMIT

Melbourne (2013-2016) was about the nature of recoil in rail guns. Two US Navy officers in 2007 and 2009 had made a "static" railgun that indicated there was no reaction to the bullet's force, but overall there could be no violation of inertia as the
power supply was on the ground so that could absorb the reaction. In this case the power supply is on the gun, which is of a radically new and far superior design (heavy armature, low voltage, light, efficient by a factor of at least 10) and of course a
working model instead of a static system. I did not get my PhD for they at the final viva did not think I had made a rail gun then, so rejected my thesis. Well, whether I had or not made a working model of a rail gun is also shown in this post! Viewers
can make up their minds!

About the graph, it shows the recoil of the gun, and then how it comes back into a motor mode when the heavy bullet hits the end of the barrel. (Like blocking the barrel of a gun, catching the bullet in it.) Well that is dangerous of course, but here

the speed is not great, the design is robust enough although the edge did fly off and stop the motor a bit prematurely. Still, that did not impac the experimental results which show that without friction and such impact the motor would have gone on for
ever, thus violating inertia, the most sacred principle in both classical and modern physics.

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=7521409061220159&set=pcb.7521439881217077

Unfortunately, for the world, the powers that be, simply ignore - the charge of my being delusional is not being made thus, a small mercy!
Dunning-Kluger works only so far.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)