1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.PHYSICS

  • Re: Discussion on tachyons

    From [email protected]@21:1/5 to Dekota Tzederbaum on Thu Oct 26 11:29:48 2023
    On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 9:29:39 AM UTC-7, Dekota Tzederbaum wrote:
    Gary Harnagel wrote:

    I think it's time to have a rational discussion of tachyonic
    communication and the limitations thereof. DOI:
    10.13189/ujpa.2023.170101 present a proof that tachyons, even if they existed, could not violate causality by sending a message into the past. Some of the salient points in that paper are listed below.

    (1) The four-momentum formalism (4MF) isn't immune from criticism
    because it's declared to be a "definition. Nature doesn't care about
    what humans assert.

    idiot, you don't undrestand anything. If "tachyons" doesn't, so doesn't light, hence photons. You don't undrestand Nature and manifolds.

    They would arrive from the future... and they are not.
    They are a mathematical flunk... No negative Gamma
    They have never existed. And never will.
    How have we measured them to say they exist?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Thu Oct 26 12:55:15 2023
    [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:

    They would arrive from the future... and they are not.
    They are a mathematical flunk... No negative Gamma
    They have never existed. And never will.
    How have we measured them to say they exist?


    Confused moron babble.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Folmsbee@21:1/5 to Electo Dankuldinets on Wed Nov 1 07:48:07 2023
    On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 10:18:22 AM UTC-4, Electo Dankuldinets wrote:
    Gary Harnagel wrote:

    “The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are
    always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.” >> > -- Bertrand Russell

    Is Mr. Russell sure about that? -- Rich

    Good point!
    “‎When you point your finger at someone, anyone, it is often a moment of
    judgement. We point our fingers when we want to scold someone, point out what they have done wrong. But each time we point, we simultaneously
    point three fingers back at ourselves.” – Christopher Pike

    you see too many movies. What kind of fucking mathematician are you, not undrestanding 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀 and 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗱𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀. What a disgrace.

    clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (crispr)

    If you could travel to Mars in a ship at speed 2c, you would only get a
    view of Earth, through a telescope, showing what it looked like a few
    minutes before. But a modern telescope is so blurred, the "past time"
    that you would see is limited to past hurricane positions and big things like that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)