XPost: sci.physics.relativity

Mikko wrote:

On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:45:17 PM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:

I presume you are talking about the 1,00+
ONLINE GAMBLING spams that just landed
on SPR

While that continues, sci.physics.research could be a useful
alternative.

Mikko

sci.physics.research SUCKS. They moderate your words. They decide
whether your postings
should be allowed or removed.

Most moderated newsgroups have a second unofficial moderator that that
official moderator *appeases* to.


So, now you have two or more moderatos to suck up to.


Moderated newsgroups strip you of your soul.








--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

The Starmaker wrote:

Mikko wrote:

On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:45:17 PM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:

I presume you are talking about the 1,00+
ONLINE GAMBLING spams that just landed
on SPR

While that continues, sci.physics.research could be a useful
alternative.

Mikko

sci.physics.research SUCKS. They moderate your words. They decide
whether your postings
should be allowed or removed.

Most moderated newsgroups have a second unofficial moderator that that official moderator *appeases* to.

So, now you have two or more moderatos to suck up to.

Moderated newsgroups strip you of your soul.

you can always tell who are the unofficial moderators in a moderated
newsgroups
that the official moderated is 'appeasing' to...
they are the LOUDEST voices in the room.






--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

On 9/30/2023 1:22 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

Mikko wrote:

On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:45:17 PM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:

I presume you are talking about the 1,00+
ONLINE GAMBLING spams that just landed
on SPR

While that continues, sci.physics.research could be a useful
alternative.

Mikko

sci.physics.research SUCKS. They moderate your words. They decide
whether your postings
should be allowed or removed.

Most moderated newsgroups have a second unofficial moderator that that official moderator *appeases* to.

So, now you have two or more moderatos to suck up to.

Moderated newsgroups strip you of your soul.

I've never been in one since 1990s. Tried them and found them things
amounting to jokes.

They automatically eliminate anyone who's above the moderator's head,
bringing down the entire enterprise to the level of some Schmuck's world
whose been given moderating role.

Even _I_ should not be a moderator :) Cause I'll eliminate anything I
don't understand the value.

There's not a good moderator in the entire world. Just like there's not
a good stupid_as_fuck person.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

don't you people by now know the difference between a spammer and a mad russian????

A spammer is trying to sell something.
So a spammer will use the most cross-postings he can to
sell his warez.


dis guy is a mad russian. he isn't cross-posting to sell, meaning
he is not selling...he's flooding. sabotage.

he is wearing the wrong size shoes.

maybe the russians are going to draft him to fight and die in ukraine.

after all he did for mother russia.


(and he is mad putin has netflix)

i'll tell you what
i'll go to ukraine
and shoot him.

the only good commie is a dead commie.










--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)