1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.PHYSICS

  • What can science see?

    From [email protected]@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 26 15:22:45 2023
    observing phenomenon is not enough
    to be an understanding.
    Science is wrong. It claims otherwise.
    Science is blind.
    Defining a phenomenon is not enough
    you need understanding science does
    not have now. Science doesn't like truth.
    Even Einstein said that.


    Mitchell Raemsch

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Aug 26 15:50:44 2023
    [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
    observing phenomenon is not enough
    to be an understanding.
    Science is wrong. It claims otherwise.
    Science is blind.
    Defining a phenomenon is not enough
    you need understanding science does
    not have now. Science doesn't like truth.

    Incoherent, babbling nonsense, moron.

    Even Einstein said that.

    No, he did not, moron.



    Mitchell Raemsch

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From [email protected]@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Sat Aug 26 17:53:12 2023
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 4:01:11 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
    [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
    observing phenomenon is not enough
    to be an understanding.
    Science is wrong. It claims otherwise.
    Science is blind.
    Defining a phenomenon is not enough
    you need understanding science does
    not have now. Science doesn't like truth.
    Incoherent, babbling nonsense, moron.

    Even Einstein said that.

    No, he did not, moron.

    You might not like it but he said the atheists
    were lying to him. And that they wanted to
    beat religion. He said that is what he did not
    see until the end. That science is wrong
    to try and beat religion... That is what does not belong.
    Science is wrong. Even according to the
    horse's mouth.

    Mitchell Raemsch




    Mitchell Raemsch

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Aug 26 18:20:14 2023
    [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 4:01:11 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
    [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
    observing phenomenon is not enough
    to be an understanding.
    Science is wrong. It claims otherwise.
    Science is blind.
    Defining a phenomenon is not enough
    you need understanding science does
    not have now. Science doesn't like truth.
    Incoherent, babbling nonsense, moron.

    Even Einstein said that.

    No, he did not, moron.

    You might not like it but he said the atheists
    were lying to him. And that they wanted to
    beat religion. He said that is what he did not
    see until the end. That science is wrong
    to try and beat religion... That is what does not belong.
    Science is wrong. Even according to the
    horse's mouth.

    Mitchell Raemsch

    Babbling, inane nonsense.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From [email protected]@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Sat Aug 26 20:47:13 2023
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 6:31:10 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
    [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 4:01:11 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
    [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
    observing phenomenon is not enough
    to be an understanding.
    Science is wrong. It claims otherwise.
    Science is blind.
    Defining a phenomenon is not enough
    you need understanding science does
    not have now. Science doesn't like truth.
    Incoherent, babbling nonsense, moron.

    Even Einstein said that.

    No, he did not, moron.

    You might not like it but he said the atheists
    were lying to him. And that they wanted to
    beat religion. He said that is what he did not
    see until the end. That science is wrong
    to try and beat religion... That is what does not belong.
    Science is wrong. Even according to the
    horse's mouth.

    Mitchell Raemsch
    Babbling, inane nonsense.

    Einstein knew better.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sun Aug 27 06:14:00 2023
    [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 6:31:10 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
    [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 4:01:11 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
    [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
    observing phenomenon is not enough
    to be an understanding.
    Science is wrong. It claims otherwise.
    Science is blind.
    Defining a phenomenon is not enough
    you need understanding science does
    not have now. Science doesn't like truth.
    Incoherent, babbling nonsense, moron.

    Even Einstein said that.

    No, he did not, moron.

    You might not like it but he said the atheists
    were lying to him. And that they wanted to
    beat religion. He said that is what he did not
    see until the end. That science is wrong
    to try and beat religion... That is what does not belong.
    Science is wrong. Even according to the
    horse's mouth.

    Mitchell Raemsch
    Babbling, inane nonsense.

    Einstein knew better.

    You haven't the slightest clue what Einstein knew, moron.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)