[email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
forms of motion? What is their defining difference science?
Mitchell RaemschMoron gibberish.
forms of motion? What is their defining difference science?
Mitchell Raemsch
forms of motion? What is their defining difference science?
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 6:16:16 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
[email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
forms of motion? What is their defining difference science?Moron gibberish.
Mitchell Raemsch
If science can't define the difference between absolute and relative
motion how are they going to argue the difference?
Where is science's measurement of them?
On 8/18/2023 7:40 PM, [email protected] wrote:
forms of motion? What is their defining difference science?
Simple. Relative motion exists. Absolute motion doesn't.
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 9:44:59 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
On 8/18/2023 7:40 PM, [email protected] wrote:
forms of motion? What is their defining difference science?Simple. Relative motion exists. Absolute motion doesn't.
It is just science's assumption. How is it measured?
Einstein said absolute motion does. as light.
But the atom can compete with that... in space
leaving it behind at a motion BH
At a motion BH the atom is moving ahead
of light at near light speed. How can they both
compete? it suggests the atom is like light.
So what is your measurement that shows
relative motion is real and not absolute?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 20:36:20 |
| Calls: | 12,104 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 15,004 |
| Messages: | 6,518,104 |