• Re: Vincent Meunier,Donald Schwendeman, Rensselaer Polytechnic, Ethan B

    From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to Volney on Wed Jul 26 21:11:19 2023
    Can_Dr.Glenn Ciolek,Dr.Julian S. Georg,Dr.Vincent Meunier,Dr.Ethan Brown, --please--step into their Rensselaer Polytech physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine
    tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.00001 gram or less of hydrogen and oxygen test
    tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.


    Kibo on mental illness
    Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney the crazy stalker,defiler, demonizer claims he is a Rensselaer graduate, yet AP is skeptical for what engineer does not know percentages-- Kibo says 938 is 12% short of 945.
    On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 4:20:59 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    "mentally ill"
    Re: "imp of math"


    On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 4:20:59 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    "mentally ill"


    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 11:52:25 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    Re:"barking fuckdog"
    Woodlouse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
    "Kim Jong Un's lackey"
    y=5x^2 is a parabola, not a circle, tardboy.

    First you don't know what an ellipse is, now you don't know what a
    parabola or a circle are? I guess conic sections just aren't your thing.

    Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
    Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin,
    Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang

    Rensselaer math department
    Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai,
    Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann


    +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within

    3m views Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium


    Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.


    Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium

    In Old Chemistry and Old Physics, their subatomic particles were do nothing and no function and no job particles that sit around as balls or whiz around the outside of balls doing nothing but pointless circling.

    In New Physics and New Chemistry-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Every subatomic particle has a job a function a purpose as to the Laws of Electromagnetism--- Faraday law, Coulomb law, Ampere law, Capacitor
    law.

    A proton is a torus of 840MeV with 840 windings, while the muon is the true electron of Atoms and is encased inside the proton torus thrusting through and producing electricity-- magnetic monopoles.

    The neutron of Atoms is a parallel plate capacitor storing the electricity of proton+muon and is skin cover on the outside of the proton torus in the form of parallel plates.

    Can hydrogen be a Atom if it is just a proton+muon? No, all atoms require to have a capacitor such as at least one neutron. Thus the Hydrogen Atom is H2 where you have 2 proton+muon where 1 of the 2 proton+muon acts like a neutron to the other
    proton+muon. Thus, water molecule is not H2O but rather is H4O.

    AP is waiting for experimental chemists and physicists to prove him correct that Water is H4O.

    In the meantime we have Hydroxyl which in Old Chemistry, especially Biology is OH, while AP says that is wrong and that is really H2O.

    Now glycerine is a hydroxyl with formula C3H8O3. And what I am thinking at this moment, is that hydroxyls will be an easier proof that Water is truly H4O, rather than wait for experimentalists to actually "weigh the electrolysis test tubes of
    oxygen and hydrogen".

    You see, with H4O as water, glycerine is C3(2 waters)O with an extra oxygen. If Water is H2O then glycerine is C3(4 waters) deficit O. It is missing an oxygen if water is H2O.

    The reason glycerine is so effective as a skin ointment is because it has glycerine, the extra O oxygen. If water were H2O, then glycerine would be a missing oxygen and not a skin lotion that works, but makes skin even more dry.

    Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium

    Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
    12:24 AM (13 hours ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe

    --- quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
    Perhaps there is only two Faraday laws on Electrolysis. I am looking at the one that states: Faraday's first law of electrolysis relates the mass of a substance liberated (or deposited) at an electrode to the electric charge used (Q). A
    proportionality constant Z can be used:

    m = ZQ = (E/96485)(Q)

    m = mass, Q = total charge rewritten as Q = I*t amperes x time in seconds.

    This website gives an example: 5amps passed through molten Sodium Chloride for 3 hours. Calculate the mass of Sodium. E=23/1.

    m = (23/96485) (5) (3*60*60) approx 12.87 grams.

    --- end quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---

    Now has such a experiment been performed on Water to see how much atomic mass of hydrogen and of oxygen results??? If AP is correct, the formula of water is H4O, if Old Physics, Old Chemistry is correct the formula is H2O. So which is it???

    AP


    No, sorry no, Faraday's Law of Electrolysis is not going to tell the correct mass of hydrogen.

    Reading Wikipedia on Faraday's Electrolysis law.

    --- quoting Wikipedia ---
    A monovalent ion requires 1 electron for discharge, a divalent ion requires 2 electrons for discharge and so on. Thus, if x electrons flow,
    x/v atoms are discharged.

    So the mass m discharged is

    m= (xM)/vN_A) = (QM)/(eN_A *v) = (QM) / (vF)
    where
    N_A is the Avogadro constant;
    Q = xe is the total charge, equal to the number of electrons (x) times the elementary charge e;
    F is the Faraday constant.
    --- end quoting Wikipedia ---

    No, the Faraday law of Electrolysis will not work on water with a correct answer, because H is not an atom but H2 is an Atom. And where one of the proton+muon converts to being a neutron to the other proton+muon.

    So if Faraday's law of Electrolysis was applied to water, thinking it would deliver a true answer is mistaken because the one H converts to neutron.

    So it appears that we need to directly measure the test tube of oxygen and the test tube of hydrogen by a direct mass measurement.

    AP
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
    1:14 AM (12 hours ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    I doubt we can measure a test tube of hydrogen or test tube of oxygen, too small to determine the mass on some sort of weight scale.

    But here is a possible lucrative idea. We should be able to get pure deuterium water. Then run the electrolysis. Collect the test tubes.

    Now have some sort of balancing beam weight scale. Place the regular water of hydrogen test tube on one side, and place the deuterium water hydrogen test tube on other side. If they stay balanced, then AP is correct and Water is really H4O.

    AP
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
    1:48 AM (11 hours ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    Cosmic Rays from Sun

    90% of Sun's cosmic rays are 840MeV proton+muon inside = H. The hydrogen Atom is H2 where one of the H proton+muon converts to being a neutron.

    When these proton+muon hit Earth atmosphere, they can turn into pions and muons.

    I commented that H alone is a subatomic particle and that makes sense in the idea that Sun's cosmic rays are 90% these proton+muon.

    Now is interstellar hydrogen H2 and intergalactic hydrogen H2 formed when one H cosmic ray joins up with another H cosmic ray to form H2 atom?

    Is this how we get H2 in outer space? From the splitting apart of H2 into H cosmic rays?

    So how much of the Sun's hydrogen is H2 and how much is H ready to join with another H and reform back into H2. Probably little of the Sun's H is H alone, and the vast majority of the Sun's hydrogen is H2.

    How much deuterium in the Sun? And it is a higher percentage than the deuterium in water on Earth?

    AP
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
    3:11 AM (10 hours ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    Water is the only known non-metallic substance that expands when if freezes; its density decreases and it expands approximately 9% by volume. (Source: web Lunar and Planetary Institute)

    I have to wait for experimental chemists and physicists to weigh the mass of test tubes from electrolysis, as to the verdict-- water is H4O.

    But until that news comes in, I will look for other means of proof.

    So AP says that the H2 is not a molecule but is the hydrogen Atom itself, where one proton+muon converts to a neutron and capacitates the other proton+muon which undergo the Faraday law.

    There are subatomic particles of H in the form of Cosmic Rays from the Sun, but most of the Sun's hydrogen is H2, and flips back and forth from H to rejoining to form H2. Some gets away from the Sun and is cosmic rays.

    But H2 is an Atom and H is a fleeting subatomic particle.

    So can I prove Water is H4O from the data of Spectral lines of H2 is the same as deuterium, only slight difference is that the deuterium is a full fledged neutron not a makeshift proton+muon of H.

    I suspect that special trait of water freezing is a proof that Water is H4O. Because the 840MeV proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law acting as a makeshift neutron capacitor for the other 840MeV proton torus with muon inside, is
    where H2 gets that expansion characteristic.

    A neutron is a parallel plate capacitor and those plates can expand when frozen temperature occurs. As the temperature gets colder, those plates move further apart.

    Now does deuterium which truly has a full neutron, does it expand also when frozen?? If so, does it expand as much as H2 which is 2 protons with 2 muons inside?

    So comparing the freezing and expansion of the parallel plates of a neutron in deuterium with the freezing and expansion of one of the proton+muon that is acting as a makeshift neutron in H2.

    If I can numbers correlate the H2 expansion with the Deuterium expansion would be a alternative proof that Water is really H4O and not H2O.

    AP
    to
    So now on Blankenship's book "Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis", 2014, page 134, shows The structure of ATP, ADP, AMP. And within that structure are OH hydroxyls.

    In New Chemistry, water is truly H4O, and where hydroxyls are now H2O. And we have first proof of this in the Figure 8.1 of Blankenship's "Chemical structure of ATP".

    For in the lower left corner of the diagram, Blankenship has a H+ all alone, (really a mindless error) and has P surrounded by O-, O-, O and OH. The OH is really H2O for hydroxyls are H2O and water itself is H4O, and that would leave that
    mindless H+ as being hydrogen Atom of H2.

    The world of physics and chemistry should drop what they are doing and weigh the electrolysis test tube of hydrogen and oxygen to discover the correct true formula of water is H4O.

    AP is total confident, becuase an Atom cannot exist if it has no capacitor structure such as a neutron, or one of the H in H2 acting as a neutron. I am totally confident that Water formula is truly H4O. And I need look only to methane of H4C,
    to realize that there is no HC, no H2C, no H3C, but starts with H4C, and that tells me water starts with H4O. Totally confident that Old Chemistry, Old Physics did electrolysis experiments and the moment they saw hydrogen test tube be 2x volume of oxygen
    test tube, they dropped their work and went out for a Danish and coffee break, rather than finish their work--- actual physics weighing of atomic mass units (not the Faraday electrolysis law for it does not apply to water).

    When water electrolysis is physics weighed, AP is confident that there are 4H per every one oxygen O. And that Water is truly H4O.

    AP, King of Science
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium
    9:34 AM (15 minutes ago)



    to
    On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 8:56:57 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.

    Now modern day physics and chemist experimenters can really do a marvelous job if they wanted to. For they could freeze the test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen to where they are liquid and compare liquids from water electrolysis.
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium
    10:01 AM (5 hours ago)



    to
    So, what AP is saying here is that we do electrolysis of water. We collect the two test tubes, one with oxygen the other with hydrogen.

    To prove Water is truly the formula H4O and not H2O we must weigh the masses of the two tubes to find that the ratio is 1 x 16amu to 4 x 1amu.

    The silly grotesque science error of the past was to look at volumes in the two test tubes-- "Hey-- the hydrogen is twice the volume of oxygen so the formula of water is H2O".

    No, way was that science good practice. For the correct formula of water needs to be measured by mass, by atomic mass units where Oxygen is 16amu and hydrogen is 1amu.

    I suspect a balance beam scale is good enough to see the hydrogen test tube will be 1/4 as massive as the oxygen test tube. To get within precision of electronic weighing scale of 0.00001 gram we just have to make a larger test tube of
    electrolysis of water.

    AP is betting that the readings will be hydrogen test tube 1/4 the mass of oxygen test tube proving Water formula is truly H4O.

    Old Physics and Old Chemistry is betting that the mass experiment will have the hydrogen test tube be 1/8 the mass of the oxygen test tube, proving Water formula is H2O.

    AP does not have these precision equipment to conduct an at-home experiment of this nature.

    AP
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium
    12:38 PM (4 hours ago)



    to
    So, once Water is found to actually be H4O, not H2O, we move on to methane, and ask the same question of its hydrogen bonds. Is Methane really that of H8C and not H4C.

    Well, looking in the literature for anomalies to methane, I come across a arXiv "Low and high-temperature anomalies in the physical properties of solid methane "The anomalous behavior of thermodynamic, spectral, plastic, elastic and some other
    properties of solid methane is discussed near 20.48K and...

    AP wonders: if they can get methane to solid form, well, I am then hopeful that the mass of the molecule can be determined. Because if methane is truly H8C, that difference of H4 in atomic mass units would be very much noticeable difference.

    Chemistry Europe--
    "The Anomalous Deuterium Isotope Effect in the NMR Spectrum of Methane...

    P Vermeeren, 2023
    "The abnormally long and weak methylidyne C-H bond.."
    "The C-H bond of the methylidyne radical, CH*, is abnormally long and weak, even longer and..."

    AP asks, are these anomalies solved if we consider methane is actually H8C and not H4C?

    AP

    My 250th published book.

    TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY; H2 is the hydrogen Atom and water is H4O, not H2O// Chemistry

    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

    Prologue: This textbook is 1/2 research history and 1/2 factual textbook combined as one textbook. For many of the experiments described here-in have not yet been performed, such as water is really H4O not H2O. Written in a style of history research with
    date-time markers, and fact telling. And there are no problem sets. This book is intended for 1st year college. Until I include problem sets and exercises, I leave it to the professor and instructor to provide such. And also, chemistry is hugely a
    laboratory science, even more so than physics, so a first year college student in the lab to test whether Water is really H4O and not H2O is mighty educational.

    Preface: This is my 250th book of science, and the first of my textbooks on Teaching True Chemistry. I have completed the Teaching True Physics and the Teaching True Mathematics textbook series. But had not yet started on a Teaching True Chemistry
    textbook series. What got me started on this project is the fact that no chemistry textbook had the correct formula for water which is actually H4O and not H2O. Leaving the true formula for hydroxyl groups as H2O and not OH. But none of this is possible
    in Old Chemistry, Old Physics where they had do-nothing subatomic particles that sit around and do nothing or go whizzing around the outside of balls in a nucleus, in a mindless circling. Once every subatomic particle has a job, task, function, then
    water cannot be H2O but rather H4O. And a hydrogen atom cannot be H alone but is actually H2. H2 is not a molecule of hydrogen but a full fledged Atom, a single atom of hydrogen.

    Cover Picture: Sorry for the crude sketch work but chemistry and physics students are going to have to learn to make such sketches in a minute or less. Just as they make Lewis diagrams or ball & stick diagrams. My 4-5 minute sketch-work of the Water
    molecule H4O plus the subatomic particle H, and the hydrogen atom H2. Showing how one H is a proton torus with muon inside (blue color) doing the Faraday law. Protons are toruses with many windings. Protons are the coils in Faraday law while muons are
    the bar magnets. Neutrons are the capacitors as parallel plates, the outer skin cover of atoms.

    Product details
    • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CCLPTBDG
    • Publication date ‏ : ‎ July 21, 2023
    • Language ‏ : ‎ English
    • File size ‏ : ‎ 784 KB
    • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
    • Print length ‏ : ‎ 160 pages






    y z
    | /
    | /
    |/______ x

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to Archimedes Plutonium on Wed Aug 9 13:05:57 2023
    Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's
    homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.00001 gram or less
    of hydrogen and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.

    Univ. Pittsburgh, Dr. Patrick D.Gallagher (physics), Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau,Dr.Daniel Boyanovsky,Dr.Wolfgang J. Choyke,Dr.Anthony H.Duncan,Dr.Steven A.Dytman,Dr. Eugene Engels,Dr.George G. Gatewood,Dr.Tao Han,Dr.
    Allen I.Janis,Dr.David Jasnow, Dr.Rainer Johnsen,Dr.Peter F.M.Koehler, Dr.Arthur Kosowsky,Dr.John Cooper, Dr.Alexander Deiters,Dr. Angela M Gronenborn,Dr.Sethe Horne,Dr. Sunil Saxena,Dr.Peter Wipf


    Jeffrey Rubard (pronounced rhubarb) wonders how on Earth the Univ Pittsburgh Thomas Hales can claim to prove Kepler Packing when he never defines "infinity" in his fake proof (see AP's true proof below). But furthermore, Dr.Hales is such a failure of
    math that to this very day, he believes a slant cut of right circular cone is a ellipse, when in truth it is a oval, and Mr. Rubard also is complaining of this, for even the High School kids in the Pittsburgh area can take a paper cone (roll up a paper)
    and place a coin inside and slant it and see that it is a OVAL, not an ellipse. But the worst failing of Dr. Hales, for which he should have his degree rescinded for wasting all the time of many in mathematics, is that Dr. Hales failed math by never
    giving a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, much less a valid proof (See AP's below).

    Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    unread,
    Aug 8, 2023, 2:15:58 PM (yesterday)



    to sci.math
    On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 1:42:39 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    *Can_Dr.John Goodenough (chem),J.Rubard,Dr.Douglas Abraham, Dr.Prateek Agrawal, Dr.Wade Allison, --please--step into the Oxford Univ physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab
    cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.00001 gram or less of hydrogen
    and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.

    Intellectual Fraud, Simply: "Technically it's quite illegal to include Mr. Rubard in this 'laundry list' of spurious experts... no, at all."
    Jeffrey Rubard's profile photo
    Jeffrey Rubard
    unread,
    11:10 AM (3 hours ago)



    to sci.math

    Wider World: "Yeah, you guys are pretty credulous about this 'snookering' stuff, it's like you're the ones being 'taken in'."



    +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within

    +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within

    3m views Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium


    Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.


    Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium

    In Old Chemistry and Old Physics, their subatomic particles were do nothing and no function and no job particles that sit around as balls or whiz around the outside of balls doing nothing but pointless circling.

    In New Physics and New Chemistry-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Every subatomic particle has a job a function a purpose as to the Laws of Electromagnetism--- Faraday law, Coulomb law, Ampere law, Capacitor law.

    A proton is a torus of 840MeV with 840 windings, while the muon is the true electron of Atoms and is encased inside the proton torus thrusting through and producing electricity-- magnetic monopoles.

    The neutron of Atoms is a parallel plate capacitor storing the electricity of proton+muon and is skin cover on the outside of the proton torus in the form of parallel plates.

    Can hydrogen be a Atom if it is just a proton+muon? No, all atoms require to have a capacitor such as at least one neutron. Thus the Hydrogen Atom is H2 where you have 2 proton+muon where 1 of the 2 proton+muon acts like a neutron to the other
    proton+muon. Thus, water molecule is not H2O but rather is H4O.

    AP is waiting for experimental chemists and physicists to prove him correct that Water is H4O.

    In the meantime we have Hydroxyl which in Old Chemistry, especially Biology is OH, while AP says that is wrong and that is really H2O.

    Now glycerine is a hydroxyl with formula C3H8O3. And what I am thinking at this moment, is that hydroxyls will be an easier proof that Water is truly H4O, rather than wait for experimentalists to actually "weigh the electrolysis test tubes of
    oxygen and hydrogen".

    You see, with H4O as water, glycerine is C3(2 waters)O with an extra oxygen. If Water is H2O then glycerine is C3(4 waters) deficit O. It is missing an oxygen if water is H2O.

    The reason glycerine is so effective as a skin ointment is because it has glycerine, the extra O oxygen. If water were H2O, then glycerine would be a missing oxygen and not a skin lotion that works, but makes skin even more dry.

    Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium

    Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
    12:24 AM (13 hours ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe

    --- quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
    Perhaps there is only two Faraday laws on Electrolysis. I am looking at the one that states: Faraday's first law of electrolysis relates the mass of a substance liberated (or deposited) at an electrode to the electric charge used (Q). A
    proportionality constant Z can be used:

    m = ZQ = (E/96485)(Q)

    m = mass, Q = total charge rewritten as Q = I*t amperes x time in seconds.

    This website gives an example: 5amps passed through molten Sodium Chloride for 3 hours. Calculate the mass of Sodium. E=23/1.

    m = (23/96485) (5) (3*60*60) approx 12.87 grams.

    --- end quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---

    Now has such a experiment been performed on Water to see how much atomic mass of hydrogen and of oxygen results??? If AP is correct, the formula of water is H4O, if Old Physics, Old Chemistry is correct the formula is H2O. So which is it???

    AP


    No, sorry no, Faraday's Law of Electrolysis is not going to tell the correct mass of hydrogen.

    Reading Wikipedia on Faraday's Electrolysis law.

    --- quoting Wikipedia ---
    A monovalent ion requires 1 electron for discharge, a divalent ion requires 2 electrons for discharge and so on. Thus, if x electrons flow,
    x/v atoms are discharged.

    So the mass m discharged is

    m= (xM)/vN_A) = (QM)/(eN_A *v) = (QM) / (vF)
    where
    N_A is the Avogadro constant;
    Q = xe is the total charge, equal to the number of electrons (x) times the elementary charge e;
    F is the Faraday constant.
    --- end quoting Wikipedia ---

    No, the Faraday law of Electrolysis will not work on water with a correct answer, because H is not an atom but H2 is an Atom. And where one of the proton+muon converts to being a neutron to the other proton+muon.

    So if Faraday's law of Electrolysis was applied to water, thinking it would deliver a true answer is mistaken because the one H converts to neutron.

    So it appears that we need to directly measure the test tube of oxygen and the test tube of hydrogen by a direct mass measurement.

    AP
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
    1:14 AM (12 hours ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    I doubt we can measure a test tube of hydrogen or test tube of oxygen, too small to determine the mass on some sort of weight scale.

    But here is a possible lucrative idea. We should be able to get pure deuterium water. Then run the electrolysis. Collect the test tubes.

    Now have some sort of balancing beam weight scale. Place the regular water of hydrogen test tube on one side, and place the deuterium water hydrogen test tube on other side. If they stay balanced, then AP is correct and Water is really H4O.

    AP
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
    1:48 AM (11 hours ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    Cosmic Rays from Sun

    90% of Sun's cosmic rays are 840MeV proton+muon inside = H. The hydrogen Atom is H2 where one of the H proton+muon converts to being a neutron.

    When these proton+muon hit Earth atmosphere, they can turn into pions and muons.

    I commented that H alone is a subatomic particle and that makes sense in the idea that Sun's cosmic rays are 90% these proton+muon.

    Now is interstellar hydrogen H2 and intergalactic hydrogen H2 formed when one H cosmic ray joins up with another H cosmic ray to form H2 atom?

    Is this how we get H2 in outer space? From the splitting apart of H2 into H cosmic rays?

    So how much of the Sun's hydrogen is H2 and how much is H ready to join with another H and reform back into H2. Probably little of the Sun's H is H alone, and the vast majority of the Sun's hydrogen is H2.

    How much deuterium in the Sun? And it is a higher percentage than the deuterium in water on Earth?

    AP
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
    3:11 AM (10 hours ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    Water is the only known non-metallic substance that expands when if freezes; its density decreases and it expands approximately 9% by volume. (Source: web Lunar and Planetary Institute)

    I have to wait for experimental chemists and physicists to weigh the mass of test tubes from electrolysis, as to the verdict-- water is H4O.

    But until that news comes in, I will look for other means of proof.

    So AP says that the H2 is not a molecule but is the hydrogen Atom itself, where one proton+muon converts to a neutron and capacitates the other proton+muon which undergo the Faraday law.

    There are subatomic particles of H in the form of Cosmic Rays from the Sun, but most of the Sun's hydrogen is H2, and flips back and forth from H to rejoining to form H2. Some gets away from the Sun and is cosmic rays.

    But H2 is an Atom and H is a fleeting subatomic particle.

    So can I prove Water is H4O from the data of Spectral lines of H2 is the same as deuterium, only slight difference is that the deuterium is a full fledged neutron not a makeshift proton+muon of H.

    I suspect that special trait of water freezing is a proof that Water is H4O. Because the 840MeV proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law acting as a makeshift neutron capacitor for the other 840MeV proton torus with muon inside, is
    where H2 gets that expansion characteristic.

    A neutron is a parallel plate capacitor and those plates can expand when frozen temperature occurs. As the temperature gets colder, those plates move further apart.

    Now does deuterium which truly has a full neutron, does it expand also when frozen?? If so, does it expand as much as H2 which is 2 protons with 2 muons inside?

    So comparing the freezing and expansion of the parallel plates of a neutron in deuterium with the freezing and expansion of one of the proton+muon that is acting as a makeshift neutron in H2.

    If I can numbers correlate the H2 expansion with the Deuterium expansion would be a alternative proof that Water is really H4O and not H2O.

    AP
    to
    So now on Blankenship's book "Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis", 2014, page 134, shows The structure of ATP, ADP, AMP. And within that structure are OH hydroxyls.

    In New Chemistry, water is truly H4O, and where hydroxyls are now H2O. And we have first proof of this in the Figure 8.1 of Blankenship's "Chemical structure of ATP".

    For in the lower left corner of the diagram, Blankenship has a H+ all alone, (really a mindless error) and has P surrounded by O-, O-, O and OH. The OH is really H2O for hydroxyls are H2O and water itself is H4O, and that would leave that
    mindless H+ as being hydrogen Atom of H2.

    The world of physics and chemistry should drop what they are doing and weigh the electrolysis test tube of hydrogen and oxygen to discover the correct true formula of water is H4O.

    AP is total confident, becuase an Atom cannot exist if it has no capacitor structure such as a neutron, or one of the H in H2 acting as a neutron. I am totally confident that Water formula is truly H4O. And I need look only to methane of H4C, to
    realize that there is no HC, no H2C, no H3C, but starts with H4C, and that tells me water starts with H4O. Totally confident that Old Chemistry, Old Physics did electrolysis experiments and the moment they saw hydrogen test tube be 2x volume of oxygen
    test tube, they dropped their work and went out for a Danish and coffee break, rather than finish their work--- actual physics weighing of atomic mass units (not the Faraday electrolysis law for it does not apply to water).

    When water electrolysis is physics weighed, AP is confident that there are 4H per every one oxygen O. And that Water is truly H4O.

    AP, King of Science
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium
    9:34 AM (15 minutes ago)



    to
    On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 8:56:57 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.

    Now modern day physics and chemist experimenters can really do a marvelous job if they wanted to. For they could freeze the test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen to where they are liquid and compare liquids from water electrolysis.
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium
    10:01 AM (5 hours ago)



    to
    So, what AP is saying here is that we do electrolysis of water. We collect the two test tubes, one with oxygen the other with hydrogen.

    To prove Water is truly the formula H4O and not H2O we must weigh the masses of the two tubes to find that the ratio is 1 x 16amu to 4 x 1amu.

    The silly grotesque science error of the past was to look at volumes in the two test tubes-- "Hey-- the hydrogen is twice the volume of oxygen so the formula of water is H2O".

    No, way was that science good practice. For the correct formula of water needs to be measured by mass, by atomic mass units where Oxygen is 16amu and hydrogen is 1amu.

    I suspect a balance beam scale is good enough to see the hydrogen test tube will be 1/4 as massive as the oxygen test tube. To get within precision of electronic weighing scale of 0.00001 gram we just have to make a larger test tube of
    electrolysis of water.

    AP is betting that the readings will be hydrogen test tube 1/4 the mass of oxygen test tube proving Water formula is truly H4O.

    Old Physics and Old Chemistry is betting that the mass experiment will have the hydrogen test tube be 1/8 the mass of the oxygen test tube, proving Water formula is H2O.

    AP does not have these precision equipment to conduct an at-home experiment of this nature.

    AP
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium
    12:38 PM (4 hours ago)



    to
    So, once Water is found to actually be H4O, not H2O, we move on to methane, and ask the same question of its hydrogen bonds. Is Methane really that of H8C and not H4C.

    Well, looking in the literature for anomalies to methane, I come across a arXiv "Low and high-temperature anomalies in the physical properties of solid methane "The anomalous behavior of thermodynamic, spectral, plastic, elastic and some other
    properties of solid methane is discussed near 20.48K and...

    AP wonders: if they can get methane to solid form, well, I am then hopeful that the mass of the molecule can be determined. Because if methane is truly H8C, that difference of H4 in atomic mass units would be very much noticeable difference.

    Chemistry Europe--
    "The Anomalous Deuterium Isotope Effect in the NMR Spectrum of Methane...

    P Vermeeren, 2023
    "The abnormally long and weak methylidyne C-H bond.."
    "The C-H bond of the methylidyne radical, CH*, is abnormally long and weak, even longer and..."

    AP asks, are these anomalies solved if we consider methane is actually H8C and not H4C?

    AP


    My 250th published book.

    TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY; H2 is the hydrogen Atom and water is H4O, not H2O// Chemistry
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
    Prologue: This textbook is 1/2 research history and 1/2 factual textbook combined as one textbook. For many of the experiments described here-in have not yet been performed, such as water is really H4O not H2O. Written in a style of history research
    with date-time markers, and fact telling. And there are no problem sets. This book is intended for 1st year college. Until I include problem sets and exercises, I leave it to the professor and instructor to provide such. And also, chemistry is hugely a
    laboratory science, even more so than physics, so a first year college student in the lab to test whether Water is really H4O and not H2O is mighty educational.

    Preface: This is my 250th book of science, and the first of my textbooks on Teaching True Chemistry. I have completed the Teaching True Physics and the Teaching True Mathematics textbook series. But had not yet started on a Teaching True Chemistry
    textbook series. What got me started on this project is the fact that no chemistry textbook had the correct formula for water which is actually H4O and not H2O. Leaving the true formula for hydroxyl groups as H2O and not OH. But none of this is possible
    in Old Chemistry, Old Physics where they had do-nothing subatomic particles that sit around and do nothing or go whizzing around the outside of balls in a nucleus, in a mindless circling. Once every subatomic particle has a job, task, function, then
    water cannot be H2O but rather H4O. And a hydrogen atom cannot be H alone but is actually H2. H2 is not a molecule of hydrogen but a full fledged Atom, a single atom of hydrogen.

    Cover Picture: Sorry for the crude sketch work but chemistry and physics students are going to have to learn to make such sketches in a minute or less. Just as they make Lewis diagrams or ball & stick diagrams. My 4-5 minute sketch-work of the Water
    molecule H4O plus the subatomic particle H, and the hydrogen atom H2. Showing how one H is a proton torus with muon inside (blue color) doing the Faraday law. Protons are toruses with many windings. Protons are the coils in Faraday law while muons are
    the bar magnets. Neutrons are the capacitors as parallel plates, the outer skin cover of atoms.

    Product details
    • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CCLPTBDG
    • Publication date ‏ : ‎ July 21, 2023
    • Language ‏ : ‎ English
    • File size ‏ : ‎ 788 KB
    • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
    • Print length ‏ : ‎ 168 pages






    y z
    | /
    | /
    |/______ x


    My 3rd published book

    AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)


    #12-2, My 11th published book

    World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

    Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science. Preface:
    Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not
    being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

    Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most
    math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof.
    Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

    To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC
    geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry
    proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow
    us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

    Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.


    Product details
    ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
    Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
    Language ‏ : ‎ English
    File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
    Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
    Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
    #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
    #134 in Calculus (Books)
    #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

    My 24th published book


    World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3 by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

    There has been a alleged proof of KPP by Thomas Hales, but his is a fakery because he does not define what infinity actually means, for it means a borderline between finite and infinite numbers. Thus, KPP was never going to be proven until a well-defined
    infinity borderline was addressed within the proof. And because infinity has a borderline means that in free space with no borderlines to tackle and contend with, the 12 kissing point density that is the hexagonal close packed is the maximum density. But
    the truth and reality of Kepler Packing is asking for maximum packing out to infinity. That means you have to contend and fight with the packing of identical spheres up against a wall or border. And so, in tackling that wall, we can shift the hexagonal
    closed pack to another type of packing, a hybrid type of packing in order to get "maximum packing". So no proof ever of KPP is going to happen unless the proof tackles a infinity border wall. In free-space, a far distance away from a wall barrier of
    infinity border, then, hexagonal closed pack reigns and is the packing in all of free space-- but, the moment the packing gets nearby the walls of infinity border, then, we re-arrange the hexagonal closed pack to fit in more spheres. Not unlike us
    packing a suitcase and then rearranging to fit in more.

    Cover picture: is a container and so the closed packing must be modified once the border is nearly reached to maximize the number of spheres.

    Product details
    • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07NMV8NQQ
    • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 20, 2019
    • Language ‏ : ‎ English
    • File size ‏ : ‎ 1241 KB
    • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Print length ‏ : ‎ 60 pages
    • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled


    My 245th published book of science.


    Overhaul & Revitalization of Calculus// Math-psychology-sociology
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)


    Preface: The purpose of this book is to move the dial on calculus education to where all of mathematics is easy, simple, clear, and understandable to even High School students. Where calculus is taught in early High School. All of this is possible when
    mistakes are corrected in Old Math. And when those mistakes are corrected, it is seen that calculus is just a tiny bit harder than learning the 4 operators of math-- add, subtract, multiply, divide. The last two operators of math are derivative and
    integral and not much harder to learn than add, subtract, multiply, divide. Provided, Old Math mistakes are corrected and or thrown out. We throw out the Reals as numbers of math and replace them with Decimal Grid Numbers. We throw out all functions of
    math, except polynomial functions. Anything else that looks like a function, we have to convert to a polynomial, first, over a interval, and then we can work with it. When we do this, and a little more, we end up with a mathematics and a calculus that is
    ultra simple, ultra easy, ultra clear, and fun to work with. But because of the psychology of math professors and the social environment of math careers, we have this ugly mess of math and especially calculus as torture chambers, nightmares and nervous
    breakdowns. So horrid has math education become, that most students steer clear of mathematics. When in truth, once the errors of Old Math are fixed, that math is really the easiest of the physical sciences. It is the psychology and sociology that has
    made math the worst science and filled with error.


    Cover Picture: My cover picture is my iphone photograph of my own handwriting of Decimal Grid Numbers, the numbers that replace the Reals of Old Math, plus the types of polynomials, sitting a-top a sheet of graphing paper. Those three dots after the
    numbers and polynomials means they continue and I have room to show only three kinds. Calculus is after all, a science of geometry for derivative is rate of change of dy to dx, and integral is after-all the area under the function graph.


    Product details
    • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0C9P5F755
    • Publication date ‏ : ‎ June 27, 2023
    • Language ‏ : ‎ English
    • File size ‏ : ‎ 530 KB
    • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
    • Print length ‏ : ‎ 116 pages

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeffrey Rubard@21:1/5 to Archimedes Plutonium on Thu Aug 10 08:30:08 2023
    On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 1:06:01 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's
    homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.00001 gram or less
    of hydrogen and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.

    Univ. Pittsburgh, Dr. Patrick D.Gallagher (physics), Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau,Dr.Daniel Boyanovsky,Dr.Wolfgang J. Choyke,Dr.Anthony H.Duncan,Dr.Steven A.Dytman,Dr. Eugene Engels,Dr.George G. Gatewood,Dr.Tao Han,Dr.
    Allen I.Janis,Dr.David Jasnow, Dr.Rainer Johnsen,Dr.Peter F.M.Koehler, Dr.Arthur Kosowsky,Dr.John Cooper, Dr.Alexander Deiters,Dr. Angela M Gronenborn,Dr.Sethe Horne,Dr. Sunil Saxena,Dr.Peter Wipf


    Jeffrey Rubard (pronounced rhubarb) wonders how on Earth the Univ Pittsburgh Thomas Hales can claim to prove Kepler Packing when he never defines "infinity" in his fake proof (see AP's true proof below). But furthermore, Dr.Hales is such a failure of
    math that to this very day, he believes a slant cut of right circular cone is a ellipse, when in truth it is a oval, and Mr. Rubard also is complaining of this, for even the High School kids in the Pittsburgh area can take a paper cone (roll up a paper)
    and place a coin inside and slant it and see that it is a OVAL, not an ellipse. But the worst failing of Dr. Hales, for which he should have his degree rescinded for wasting all the time of many in mathematics, is that Dr. Hales failed math by never
    giving a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, much less a valid proof (See AP's below).

    Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    unread,
    Aug 8, 2023, 2:15:58 PM (yesterday)



    to sci.math
    On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 1:42:39 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    *Can_Dr.John Goodenough (chem),J.Rubard,Dr.Douglas Abraham, Dr.Prateek Agrawal, Dr.Wade Allison, --please--step into the Oxford Univ physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab
    cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.00001 gram or less of hydrogen
    and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.

    Intellectual Fraud, Simply: "Technically it's quite illegal to include Mr. Rubard in this 'laundry list' of spurious experts... no, at all."
    Jeffrey Rubard's profile photo
    Jeffrey Rubard
    unread,
    11:10 AM (3 hours ago)



    to sci.math

    Wider World: "Yeah, you guys are pretty credulous about this 'snookering' stuff, it's like you're the ones being 'taken in'."

    +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within

    +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within

    3m views Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium


    Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.


    Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium

    In Old Chemistry and Old Physics, their subatomic particles were do nothing and no function and no job particles that sit around as balls or whiz around the outside of balls doing nothing but pointless circling.

    In New Physics and New Chemistry-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Every subatomic particle has a job a function a purpose as to the Laws of Electromagnetism--- Faraday law, Coulomb law, Ampere law, Capacitor
    law.

    A proton is a torus of 840MeV with 840 windings, while the muon is the true electron of Atoms and is encased inside the proton torus thrusting through and producing electricity-- magnetic monopoles.

    The neutron of Atoms is a parallel plate capacitor storing the electricity of proton+muon and is skin cover on the outside of the proton torus in the form of parallel plates.

    Can hydrogen be a Atom if it is just a proton+muon? No, all atoms require to have a capacitor such as at least one neutron. Thus the Hydrogen Atom is H2 where you have 2 proton+muon where 1 of the 2 proton+muon acts like a neutron to the other
    proton+muon. Thus, water molecule is not H2O but rather is H4O.

    AP is waiting for experimental chemists and physicists to prove him correct that Water is H4O.

    In the meantime we have Hydroxyl which in Old Chemistry, especially Biology is OH, while AP says that is wrong and that is really H2O.

    Now glycerine is a hydroxyl with formula C3H8O3. And what I am thinking at this moment, is that hydroxyls will be an easier proof that Water is truly H4O, rather than wait for experimentalists to actually "weigh the electrolysis test tubes of
    oxygen and hydrogen".

    You see, with H4O as water, glycerine is C3(2 waters)O with an extra oxygen. If Water is H2O then glycerine is C3(4 waters) deficit O. It is missing an oxygen if water is H2O.

    The reason glycerine is so effective as a skin ointment is because it has glycerine, the extra O oxygen. If water were H2O, then glycerine would be a missing oxygen and not a skin lotion that works, but makes skin even more dry.

    Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium

    Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
    12:24 AM (13 hours ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe

    --- quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
    Perhaps there is only two Faraday laws on Electrolysis. I am looking at the one that states: Faraday's first law of electrolysis relates the mass of a substance liberated (or deposited) at an electrode to the electric charge used (Q). A
    proportionality constant Z can be used:

    m = ZQ = (E/96485)(Q)

    m = mass, Q = total charge rewritten as Q = I*t amperes x time in seconds.

    This website gives an example: 5amps passed through molten Sodium Chloride for 3 hours. Calculate the mass of Sodium. E=23/1.

    m = (23/96485) (5) (3*60*60) approx 12.87 grams.

    --- end quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---

    Now has such a experiment been performed on Water to see how much atomic mass of hydrogen and of oxygen results??? If AP is correct, the formula of water is H4O, if Old Physics, Old Chemistry is correct the formula is H2O. So which is it???

    AP


    No, sorry no, Faraday's Law of Electrolysis is not going to tell the correct mass of hydrogen.

    Reading Wikipedia on Faraday's Electrolysis law.

    --- quoting Wikipedia ---
    A monovalent ion requires 1 electron for discharge, a divalent ion requires 2 electrons for discharge and so on. Thus, if x electrons flow,
    x/v atoms are discharged.

    So the mass m discharged is

    m= (xM)/vN_A) = (QM)/(eN_A *v) = (QM) / (vF)
    where
    N_A is the Avogadro constant;
    Q = xe is the total charge, equal to the number of electrons (x) times the elementary charge e;
    F is the Faraday constant.
    --- end quoting Wikipedia ---

    No, the Faraday law of Electrolysis will not work on water with a correct answer, because H is not an atom but H2 is an Atom. And where one of the proton+muon converts to being a neutron to the other proton+muon.

    So if Faraday's law of Electrolysis was applied to water, thinking it would deliver a true answer is mistaken because the one H converts to neutron.

    So it appears that we need to directly measure the test tube of oxygen and the test tube of hydrogen by a direct mass measurement.

    AP
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
    1:14 AM (12 hours ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    I doubt we can measure a test tube of hydrogen or test tube of oxygen, too small to determine the mass on some sort of weight scale.

    But here is a possible lucrative idea. We should be able to get pure deuterium water. Then run the electrolysis. Collect the test tubes.

    Now have some sort of balancing beam weight scale. Place the regular water of hydrogen test tube on one side, and place the deuterium water hydrogen test tube on other side. If they stay balanced, then AP is correct and Water is really H4O.

    AP
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
    1:48 AM (11 hours ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    Cosmic Rays from Sun

    90% of Sun's cosmic rays are 840MeV proton+muon inside = H. The hydrogen Atom is H2 where one of the H proton+muon converts to being a neutron.

    When these proton+muon hit Earth atmosphere, they can turn into pions and muons.

    I commented that H alone is a subatomic particle and that makes sense in the idea that Sun's cosmic rays are 90% these proton+muon.

    Now is interstellar hydrogen H2 and intergalactic hydrogen H2 formed when one H cosmic ray joins up with another H cosmic ray to form H2 atom?

    Is this how we get H2 in outer space? From the splitting apart of H2 into H cosmic rays?

    So how much of the Sun's hydrogen is H2 and how much is H ready to join with another H and reform back into H2. Probably little of the Sun's H is H alone, and the vast majority of the Sun's hydrogen is H2.

    How much deuterium in the Sun? And it is a higher percentage than the deuterium in water on Earth?

    AP
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
    3:11 AM (10 hours ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    Water is the only known non-metallic substance that expands when if freezes; its density decreases and it expands approximately 9% by volume. (Source: web Lunar and Planetary Institute)

    I have to wait for experimental chemists and physicists to weigh the mass of test tubes from electrolysis, as to the verdict-- water is H4O.

    But until that news comes in, I will look for other means of proof.

    So AP says that the H2 is not a molecule but is the hydrogen Atom itself, where one proton+muon converts to a neutron and capacitates the other proton+muon which undergo the Faraday law.

    There are subatomic particles of H in the form of Cosmic Rays from the Sun, but most of the Sun's hydrogen is H2, and flips back and forth from H to rejoining to form H2. Some gets away from the Sun and is cosmic rays.

    But H2 is an Atom and H is a fleeting subatomic particle.

    So can I prove Water is H4O from the data of Spectral lines of H2 is the same as deuterium, only slight difference is that the deuterium is a full fledged neutron not a makeshift proton+muon of H.

    I suspect that special trait of water freezing is a proof that Water is H4O. Because the 840MeV proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law acting as a makeshift neutron capacitor for the other 840MeV proton torus with muon inside, is
    where H2 gets that expansion characteristic.

    A neutron is a parallel plate capacitor and those plates can expand when frozen temperature occurs. As the temperature gets colder, those plates move further apart.

    Now does deuterium which truly has a full neutron, does it expand also when frozen?? If so, does it expand as much as H2 which is 2 protons with 2 muons inside?

    So comparing the freezing and expansion of the parallel plates of a neutron in deuterium with the freezing and expansion of one of the proton+muon that is acting as a makeshift neutron in H2.

    If I can numbers correlate the H2 expansion with the Deuterium expansion would be a alternative proof that Water is really H4O and not H2O.

    AP
    to
    So now on Blankenship's book "Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis", 2014, page 134, shows The structure of ATP, ADP, AMP. And within that structure are OH hydroxyls.

    In New Chemistry, water is truly H4O, and where hydroxyls are now H2O. And we have first proof of this in the Figure 8.1 of Blankenship's "Chemical structure of ATP".

    For in the lower left corner of the diagram, Blankenship has a H+ all alone, (really a mindless error) and has P surrounded by O-, O-, O and OH. The OH is really H2O for hydroxyls are H2O and water itself is H4O, and that would leave that
    mindless H+ as being hydrogen Atom of H2.

    The world of physics and chemistry should drop what they are doing and weigh the electrolysis test tube of hydrogen and oxygen to discover the correct true formula of water is H4O.

    AP is total confident, becuase an Atom cannot exist if it has no capacitor structure such as a neutron, or one of the H in H2 acting as a neutron. I am totally confident that Water formula is truly H4O. And I need look only to methane of H4C,
    to realize that there is no HC, no H2C, no H3C, but starts with H4C, and that tells me water starts with H4O. Totally confident that Old Chemistry, Old Physics did electrolysis experiments and the moment they saw hydrogen test tube be 2x volume of oxygen
    test tube, they dropped their work and went out for a Danish and coffee break, rather than finish their work--- actual physics weighing of atomic mass units (not the Faraday electrolysis law for it does not apply to water).

    When water electrolysis is physics weighed, AP is confident that there are 4H per every one oxygen O. And that Water is truly H4O.

    AP, King of Science
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium
    9:34 AM (15 minutes ago)



    to
    On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 8:56:57 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.

    Now modern day physics and chemist experimenters can really do a marvelous job if they wanted to. For they could freeze the test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen to where they are liquid and compare liquids from water electrolysis.
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium
    10:01 AM (5 hours ago)



    to
    So, what AP is saying here is that we do electrolysis of water. We collect the two test tubes, one with oxygen the other with hydrogen.

    To prove Water is truly the formula H4O and not H2O we must weigh the masses of the two tubes to find that the ratio is 1 x 16amu to 4 x 1amu.

    The silly grotesque science error of the past was to look at volumes in the two test tubes-- "Hey-- the hydrogen is twice the volume of oxygen so the formula of water is H2O".

    No, way was that science good practice. For the correct formula of water needs to be measured by mass, by atomic mass units where Oxygen is 16amu and hydrogen is 1amu.

    I suspect a balance beam scale is good enough to see the hydrogen test tube will be 1/4 as massive as the oxygen test tube. To get within precision of electronic weighing scale of 0.00001 gram we just have to make a larger test tube of
    electrolysis of water.

    AP is betting that the readings will be hydrogen test tube 1/4 the mass of oxygen test tube proving Water formula is truly H4O.

    Old Physics and Old Chemistry is betting that the mass experiment will have the hydrogen test tube be 1/8 the mass of the oxygen test tube, proving Water formula is H2O.

    AP does not have these precision equipment to conduct an at-home experiment of this nature.

    AP
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium
    12:38 PM (4 hours ago)



    to
    So, once Water is found to actually be H4O, not H2O, we move on to methane, and ask the same question of its hydrogen bonds. Is Methane really that of H8C and not H4C.

    Well, looking in the literature for anomalies to methane, I come across a arXiv "Low and high-temperature anomalies in the physical properties of solid methane "The anomalous behavior of thermodynamic, spectral, plastic, elastic and some other
    properties of solid methane is discussed near 20.48K and...

    AP wonders: if they can get methane to solid form, well, I am then hopeful that the mass of the molecule can be determined. Because if methane is truly H8C, that difference of H4 in atomic mass units would be very much noticeable difference.

    Chemistry Europe--
    "The Anomalous Deuterium Isotope Effect in the NMR Spectrum of Methane...

    P Vermeeren, 2023
    "The abnormally long and weak methylidyne C-H bond.."
    "The C-H bond of the methylidyne radical, CH*, is abnormally long and weak, even longer and..."

    AP asks, are these anomalies solved if we consider methane is actually H8C and not H4C?

    AP


    My 250th published book.

    TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY; H2 is the hydrogen Atom and water is H4O, not H2O// Chemistry
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
    Prologue: This textbook is 1/2 research history and 1/2 factual textbook combined as one textbook. For many of the experiments described here-in have not yet been performed, such as water is really H4O not H2O. Written in a style of history research
    with date-time markers, and fact telling. And there are no problem sets. This book is intended for 1st year college. Until I include problem sets and exercises, I leave it to the professor and instructor to provide such. And also, chemistry is hugely a
    laboratory science, even more so than physics, so a first year college student in the lab to test whether Water is really H4O and not H2O is mighty educational.

    Preface: This is my 250th book of science, and the first of my textbooks on Teaching True Chemistry. I have completed the Teaching True Physics and the Teaching True Mathematics textbook series. But had not yet started on a Teaching True Chemistry
    textbook series. What got me started on this project is the fact that no chemistry textbook had the correct formula for water which is actually H4O and not H2O. Leaving the true formula for hydroxyl groups as H2O and not OH. But none of this is possible
    in Old Chemistry, Old Physics where they had do-nothing subatomic particles that sit around and do nothing or go whizzing around the outside of balls in a nucleus, in a mindless circling. Once every subatomic particle has a job, task, function, then
    water cannot be H2O but rather H4O. And a hydrogen atom cannot be H alone but is actually H2. H2 is not a molecule of hydrogen but a full fledged Atom, a single atom of hydrogen.

    Cover Picture: Sorry for the crude sketch work but chemistry and physics students are going to have to learn to make such sketches in a minute or less. Just as they make Lewis diagrams or ball & stick diagrams. My 4-5 minute sketch-work of the Water
    molecule H4O plus the subatomic particle H, and the hydrogen atom H2. Showing how one H is a proton torus with muon inside (blue color) doing the Faraday law. Protons are toruses with many windings. Protons are the coils in Faraday law while muons are
    the bar magnets. Neutrons are the capacitors as parallel plates, the outer skin cover of atoms.

    Product details
    • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CCLPTBDG
    • Publication date ‏ : ‎ July 21, 2023
    • Language ‏ : ‎ English
    • File size ‏ : ‎ 788 KB
    • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
    • Print length ‏ : ‎ 168 pages






    y z
    | /
    | /
    |/______ x
    My 3rd published book
    AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

    #12-2, My 11th published book

    World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
    Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science. Preface:
    Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof.
    Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

    Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that
    most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a
    proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

    To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a
    FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a
    Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all
    times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

    Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.


    Product details
    ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
    Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
    Language ‏ : ‎ English
    File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
    Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
    Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
    #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
    #134 in Calculus (Books)
    #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
    My 24th published book


    World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

    Wider World: "OMFG, f'in Kepler."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to All on Thu Aug 10 10:10:39 2023
    Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O.
    AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.00001 gram or
    less of hydrogen and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.

    Univ. Pittsburgh, Dr. Patrick D.Gallagher (physics), Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau,Dr.Daniel Boyanovsky,Dr.Wolfgang J. Choyke,Dr.Anthony H.Duncan,Dr.Steven A.Dytman,Dr. Eugene Engels,Dr.George G. Gatewood,Dr.Tao Han,Dr.
    Allen I.Janis,Dr.David Jasnow, Dr.Rainer Johnsen,Dr.Peter F.M.Koehler, Dr.Arthur Kosowsky,Dr.John Cooper, Dr.Alexander Deiters,Dr. Angela M Gronenborn,Dr.Sethe Horne,Dr. Sunil Saxena,Dr.Peter Wipf


    Jeffrey Rubard (pronounced rhubarb) wonders how on Earth the Univ Pittsburgh Thomas Hales can claim to prove Kepler Packing when he never defines "infinity" in his fake proof (see AP's true proof below). But furthermore, Dr.Hales is such a failure of
    math that to this very day, he believes a slant cut of right circular cone is a ellipse, when in truth it is a oval, and Mr. Rubard also is complaining of this, for even the High School kids in the Pittsburgh area can take a paper cone (roll up a paper)
    and place a coin inside and slant it and see that it is a OVAL, not an ellipse. But the worst failing of Dr. Hales, for which he should have his degree rescinded for wasting all the time of many in mathematics, is that Dr. Hales failed math by never
    giving a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, much less a valid proof (See AP's below).

    Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    unread,
    Aug 8, 2023, 2:15:58 PM (yesterday)



    to sci.math
    On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 1:42:39 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    *Can_Dr.John Goodenough (chem),J.Rubard,Dr.Douglas Abraham, Dr.Prateek Agrawal, Dr.Wade Allison, --please--step into the Oxford Univ physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab
    cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.00001 gram or less of hydrogen
    and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.

    Intellectual Fraud, Simply: "Technically it's quite illegal to include Mr. Rubard in this 'laundry list' of spurious experts... no, at all."
    Jeffrey Rubard's profile photo
    Jeffrey Rubard
    unread,
    11:10 AM (3 hours ago)



    to sci.math

    Wider World: "Yeah, you guys are pretty credulous about this 'snookering' stuff, it's like you're the ones being 'taken in'."

    +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within

    +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within

    3m views Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium


    Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.


    Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium

    In Old Chemistry and Old Physics, their subatomic particles were do nothing and no function and no job particles that sit around as balls or whiz around the outside of balls doing nothing but pointless circling.

    In New Physics and New Chemistry-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Every subatomic particle has a job a function a purpose as to the Laws of Electromagnetism--- Faraday law, Coulomb law, Ampere law, Capacitor
    law.

    A proton is a torus of 840MeV with 840 windings, while the muon is the true electron of Atoms and is encased inside the proton torus thrusting through and producing electricity-- magnetic monopoles.

    The neutron of Atoms is a parallel plate capacitor storing the electricity of proton+muon and is skin cover on the outside of the proton torus in the form of parallel plates.

    Can hydrogen be a Atom if it is just a proton+muon? No, all atoms require to have a capacitor such as at least one neutron. Thus the Hydrogen Atom is H2 where you have 2 proton+muon where 1 of the 2 proton+muon acts like a neutron to the other
    proton+muon. Thus, water molecule is not H2O but rather is H4O.

    AP is waiting for experimental chemists and physicists to prove him correct that Water is H4O.

    In the meantime we have Hydroxyl which in Old Chemistry, especially Biology is OH, while AP says that is wrong and that is really H2O.

    Now glycerine is a hydroxyl with formula C3H8O3. And what I am thinking at this moment, is that hydroxyls will be an easier proof that Water is truly H4O, rather than wait for experimentalists to actually "weigh the electrolysis test tubes of
    oxygen and hydrogen".

    You see, with H4O as water, glycerine is C3(2 waters)O with an extra oxygen. If Water is H2O then glycerine is C3(4 waters) deficit O. It is missing an oxygen if water is H2O.

    The reason glycerine is so effective as a skin ointment is because it has glycerine, the extra O oxygen. If water were H2O, then glycerine would be a missing oxygen and not a skin lotion that works, but makes skin even more dry.

    Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium

    Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
    12:24 AM (13 hours ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe

    --- quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
    Perhaps there is only two Faraday laws on Electrolysis. I am looking at the one that states: Faraday's first law of electrolysis relates the mass of a substance liberated (or deposited) at an electrode to the electric charge used (Q). A
    proportionality constant Z can be used:

    m = ZQ = (E/96485)(Q)

    m = mass, Q = total charge rewritten as Q = I*t amperes x time in seconds.

    This website gives an example: 5amps passed through molten Sodium Chloride for 3 hours. Calculate the mass of Sodium. E=23/1.

    m = (23/96485) (5) (3*60*60) approx 12.87 grams.

    --- end quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---

    Now has such a experiment been performed on Water to see how much atomic mass of hydrogen and of oxygen results??? If AP is correct, the formula of water is H4O, if Old Physics, Old Chemistry is correct the formula is H2O. So which is it???

    AP


    No, sorry no, Faraday's Law of Electrolysis is not going to tell the correct mass of hydrogen.

    Reading Wikipedia on Faraday's Electrolysis law.

    --- quoting Wikipedia ---
    A monovalent ion requires 1 electron for discharge, a divalent ion requires 2 electrons for discharge and so on. Thus, if x electrons flow,
    x/v atoms are discharged.

    So the mass m discharged is

    m= (xM)/vN_A) = (QM)/(eN_A *v) = (QM) / (vF)
    where
    N_A is the Avogadro constant;
    Q = xe is the total charge, equal to the number of electrons (x) times the elementary charge e;
    F is the Faraday constant.
    --- end quoting Wikipedia ---

    No, the Faraday law of Electrolysis will not work on water with a correct answer, because H is not an atom but H2 is an Atom. And where one of the proton+muon converts to being a neutron to the other proton+muon.

    So if Faraday's law of Electrolysis was applied to water, thinking it would deliver a true answer is mistaken because the one H converts to neutron.

    So it appears that we need to directly measure the test tube of oxygen and the test tube of hydrogen by a direct mass measurement.

    AP
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
    1:14 AM (12 hours ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    I doubt we can measure a test tube of hydrogen or test tube of oxygen, too small to determine the mass on some sort of weight scale.

    But here is a possible lucrative idea. We should be able to get pure deuterium water. Then run the electrolysis. Collect the test tubes.

    Now have some sort of balancing beam weight scale. Place the regular water of hydrogen test tube on one side, and place the deuterium water hydrogen test tube on other side. If they stay balanced, then AP is correct and Water is really H4O.

    AP
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
    1:48 AM (11 hours ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    Cosmic Rays from Sun

    90% of Sun's cosmic rays are 840MeV proton+muon inside = H. The hydrogen Atom is H2 where one of the H proton+muon converts to being a neutron.

    When these proton+muon hit Earth atmosphere, they can turn into pions and muons.

    I commented that H alone is a subatomic particle and that makes sense in the idea that Sun's cosmic rays are 90% these proton+muon.

    Now is interstellar hydrogen H2 and intergalactic hydrogen H2 formed when one H cosmic ray joins up with another H cosmic ray to form H2 atom?

    Is this how we get H2 in outer space? From the splitting apart of H2 into H cosmic rays?

    So how much of the Sun's hydrogen is H2 and how much is H ready to join with another H and reform back into H2. Probably little of the Sun's H is H alone, and the vast majority of the Sun's hydrogen is H2.

    How much deuterium in the Sun? And it is a higher percentage than the deuterium in water on Earth?

    AP
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
    3:11 AM (10 hours ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    Water is the only known non-metallic substance that expands when if freezes; its density decreases and it expands approximately 9% by volume. (Source: web Lunar and Planetary Institute)

    I have to wait for experimental chemists and physicists to weigh the mass of test tubes from electrolysis, as to the verdict-- water is H4O.

    But until that news comes in, I will look for other means of proof.

    So AP says that the H2 is not a molecule but is the hydrogen Atom itself, where one proton+muon converts to a neutron and capacitates the other proton+muon which undergo the Faraday law.

    There are subatomic particles of H in the form of Cosmic Rays from the Sun, but most of the Sun's hydrogen is H2, and flips back and forth from H to rejoining to form H2. Some gets away from the Sun and is cosmic rays.

    But H2 is an Atom and H is a fleeting subatomic particle.

    So can I prove Water is H4O from the data of Spectral lines of H2 is the same as deuterium, only slight difference is that the deuterium is a full fledged neutron not a makeshift proton+muon of H.

    I suspect that special trait of water freezing is a proof that Water is H4O. Because the 840MeV proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law acting as a makeshift neutron capacitor for the other 840MeV proton torus with muon inside, is
    where H2 gets that expansion characteristic.

    A neutron is a parallel plate capacitor and those plates can expand when frozen temperature occurs. As the temperature gets colder, those plates move further apart.

    Now does deuterium which truly has a full neutron, does it expand also when frozen?? If so, does it expand as much as H2 which is 2 protons with 2 muons inside?

    So comparing the freezing and expansion of the parallel plates of a neutron in deuterium with the freezing and expansion of one of the proton+muon that is acting as a makeshift neutron in H2.

    If I can numbers correlate the H2 expansion with the Deuterium expansion would be a alternative proof that Water is really H4O and not H2O.

    AP
    to
    So now on Blankenship's book "Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis", 2014, page 134, shows The structure of ATP, ADP, AMP. And within that structure are OH hydroxyls.

    In New Chemistry, water is truly H4O, and where hydroxyls are now H2O. And we have first proof of this in the Figure 8.1 of Blankenship's "Chemical structure of ATP".

    For in the lower left corner of the diagram, Blankenship has a H+ all alone, (really a mindless error) and has P surrounded by O-, O-, O and OH. The OH is really H2O for hydroxyls are H2O and water itself is H4O, and that would leave that
    mindless H+ as being hydrogen Atom of H2.

    The world of physics and chemistry should drop what they are doing and weigh the electrolysis test tube of hydrogen and oxygen to discover the correct true formula of water is H4O.

    AP is total confident, becuase an Atom cannot exist if it has no capacitor structure such as a neutron, or one of the H in H2 acting as a neutron. I am totally confident that Water formula is truly H4O. And I need look only to methane of H4C,
    to realize that there is no HC, no H2C, no H3C, but starts with H4C, and that tells me water starts with H4O. Totally confident that Old Chemistry, Old Physics did electrolysis experiments and the moment they saw hydrogen test tube be 2x volume of oxygen
    test tube, they dropped their work and went out for a Danish and coffee break, rather than finish their work--- actual physics weighing of atomic mass units (not the Faraday electrolysis law for it does not apply to water).

    When water electrolysis is physics weighed, AP is confident that there are 4H per every one oxygen O. And that Water is truly H4O.

    AP, King of Science
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium
    9:34 AM (15 minutes ago)



    to
    On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 8:56:57 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.

    Now modern day physics and chemist experimenters can really do a marvelous job if they wanted to. For they could freeze the test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen to where they are liquid and compare liquids from water electrolysis.
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium
    10:01 AM (5 hours ago)



    to
    So, what AP is saying here is that we do electrolysis of water. We collect the two test tubes, one with oxygen the other with hydrogen.

    To prove Water is truly the formula H4O and not H2O we must weigh the masses of the two tubes to find that the ratio is 1 x 16amu to 4 x 1amu.

    The silly grotesque science error of the past was to look at volumes in the two test tubes-- "Hey-- the hydrogen is twice the volume of oxygen so the formula of water is H2O".

    No, way was that science good practice. For the correct formula of water needs to be measured by mass, by atomic mass units where Oxygen is 16amu and hydrogen is 1amu.

    I suspect a balance beam scale is good enough to see the hydrogen test tube will be 1/4 as massive as the oxygen test tube. To get within precision of electronic weighing scale of 0.00001 gram we just have to make a larger test tube of
    electrolysis of water.

    AP is betting that the readings will be hydrogen test tube 1/4 the mass of oxygen test tube proving Water formula is truly H4O.

    Old Physics and Old Chemistry is betting that the mass experiment will have the hydrogen test tube be 1/8 the mass of the oxygen test tube, proving Water formula is H2O.

    AP does not have these precision equipment to conduct an at-home experiment of this nature.

    AP
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium
    12:38 PM (4 hours ago)



    to
    So, once Water is found to actually be H4O, not H2O, we move on to methane, and ask the same question of its hydrogen bonds. Is Methane really that of H8C and not H4C.

    Well, looking in the literature for anomalies to methane, I come across a arXiv "Low and high-temperature anomalies in the physical properties of solid methane "The anomalous behavior of thermodynamic, spectral, plastic, elastic and some other
    properties of solid methane is discussed near 20.48K and...

    AP wonders: if they can get methane to solid form, well, I am then hopeful that the mass of the molecule can be determined. Because if methane is truly H8C, that difference of H4 in atomic mass units would be very much noticeable difference.

    Chemistry Europe--
    "The Anomalous Deuterium Isotope Effect in the NMR Spectrum of Methane...

    P Vermeeren, 2023
    "The abnormally long and weak methylidyne C-H bond.."
    "The C-H bond of the methylidyne radical, CH*, is abnormally long and weak, even longer and..."

    AP asks, are these anomalies solved if we consider methane is actually H8C and not H4C?

    AP


    My 250th published book.

    TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY; H2 is the hydrogen Atom and water is H4O, not H2O// Chemistry
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
    Prologue: This textbook is 1/2 research history and 1/2 factual textbook combined as one textbook. For many of the experiments described here-in have not yet been performed, such as water is really H4O not H2O. Written in a style of history research
    with date-time markers, and fact telling. And there are no problem sets. This book is intended for 1st year college. Until I include problem sets and exercises, I leave it to the professor and instructor to provide such. And also, chemistry is hugely a
    laboratory science, even more so than physics, so a first year college student in the lab to test whether Water is really H4O and not H2O is mighty educational.

    Preface: This is my 250th book of science, and the first of my textbooks on Teaching True Chemistry. I have completed the Teaching True Physics and the Teaching True Mathematics textbook series. But had not yet started on a Teaching True Chemistry
    textbook series. What got me started on this project is the fact that no chemistry textbook had the correct formula for water which is actually H4O and not H2O. Leaving the true formula for hydroxyl groups as H2O and not OH. But none of this is possible
    in Old Chemistry, Old Physics where they had do-nothing subatomic particles that sit around and do nothing or go whizzing around the outside of balls in a nucleus, in a mindless circling. Once every subatomic particle has a job, task, function, then
    water cannot be H2O but rather H4O. And a hydrogen atom cannot be H alone but is actually H2. H2 is not a molecule of hydrogen but a full fledged Atom, a single atom of hydrogen.

    Cover Picture: Sorry for the crude sketch work but chemistry and physics students are going to have to learn to make such sketches in a minute or less. Just as they make Lewis diagrams or ball & stick diagrams. My 4-5 minute sketch-work of the Water
    molecule H4O plus the subatomic particle H, and the hydrogen atom H2. Showing how one H is a proton torus with muon inside (blue color) doing the Faraday law. Protons are toruses with many windings. Protons are the coils in Faraday law while muons are
    the bar magnets. Neutrons are the capacitors as parallel plates, the outer skin cover of atoms.

    Product details
    • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CCLPTBDG
    • Publication date ‏ : ‎ July 21, 2023
    • Language ‏ : ‎ English
    • File size ‏ : ‎ 788 KB
    • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
    • Print length ‏ : ‎ 168 pages






    y z
    | /
    | /
    |/______ x
    My 3rd published book
    AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

    #12-2, My 11th published book

    World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
    Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science. Preface:
    Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof.
    Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

    Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that
    most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a
    proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

    To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a
    FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a
    Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all
    times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

    Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.


    Product details
    ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
    Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
    Language ‏ : ‎ English
    File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
    Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
    Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
    #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
    #134 in Calculus (Books)
    #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
    My 24th published book


    World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
    There has been a alleged proof of KPP by Thomas Hales, but his is a fakery because he does not define what infinity actually means, for it means a borderline between finite and infinite numbers. Thus, KPP was never going to be proven until a well-
    defined infinity borderline was addressed within the proof. And because infinity has a borderline means that in free space with no borderlines to tackle and contend with, the 12 kissing point density that is the hexagonal close packed is the maximum
    density. But the truth and reality of Kepler Packing is asking for maximum packing out to infinity. That means you have to contend and fight with the packing of identical spheres up against a wall or border. And so, in tackling that wall, we can shift
    the hexagonal closed pack to another type of packing, a hybrid type of packing in order to get "maximum packing". So no proof ever of KPP is going to happen unless the proof tackles a infinity border wall. In free-space, a far distance away from a wall
    barrier of infinity border, then, hexagonal closed pack reigns and is the packing in all of free space-- but, the moment the packing gets nearby the walls of infinity border, then, we re-arrange the hexagonal closed pack to fit in more spheres. Not
    unlike us packing a suitcase and then rearranging to fit in more.

    Cover picture: is a container and so the closed packing must be modified once the border is nearly reached to maximize the number of spheres.

    Product details
    • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07NMV8NQQ
    • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 20, 2019
    • Language ‏ : ‎ English
    • File size ‏ : ‎ 1241 KB
    • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Print length ‏ : ‎ 60 pages
    • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled


    My 245th published book of science.
    Overhaul & Revitalization of Calculus// Math-psychology-sociology
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
    Preface: The purpose of this book is to move the dial on calculus education to where all of mathematics is easy, simple, clear, and understandable to even High School students. Where calculus is taught in early High School. All of this is possible when
    mistakes are corrected in Old Math. And when those mistakes are corrected, it is seen that calculus is just a tiny bit harder than learning the 4 operators of math-- add, subtract, multiply, divide. The last two operators of math are derivative and
    integral and not much harder to learn than add, subtract, multiply, divide. Provided, Old Math mistakes are corrected and or thrown out. We throw out the Reals as numbers of math and replace them with Decimal Grid Numbers. We throw out all functions of
    math, except polynomial functions. Anything else that looks like a function, we have to convert to a polynomial, first, over a interval, and then we can work with it. When we do this, and a little more, we end up with a mathematics and a calculus that is
    ultra simple, ultra easy, ultra clear, and fun to work with. But because of the psychology of math professors and the social environment of math careers, we have this ugly mess of math and especially calculus as torture chambers, nightmares and nervous
    breakdowns. So horrid has math education become, that most students steer clear of mathematics. When in truth, once the errors of Old Math are fixed, that math is really the easiest of the physical sciences. It is the psychology and sociology that has
    made math the worst science and filled with error.


    Cover Picture: My cover picture is my iphone photograph of my own handwriting of Decimal Grid Numbers, the numbers that replace the Reals of Old Math, plus the types of polynomials, sitting a-top a sheet of graphing paper. Those three dots after the
    numbers and polynomials means they continue and I have room to show only three kinds. Calculus is after all, a science of geometry for derivative is rate of change of dy to dx, and integral is after-all the area under the function graph.


    Product details
    • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0C9P5F755
    • Publication date ‏ : ‎ June 27, 2023
    • Language ‏ : ‎ English
    • File size ‏ : ‎ 530 KB
    • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
    • Print length ‏ : ‎ 116 pages

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeffrey Rubard@21:1/5 to Archimedes Plutonium on Fri Aug 11 09:14:19 2023
    On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O.
    AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.00001 gram
    or less of hydrogen and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.

    Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeffrey Rubard@21:1/5 to Jeffrey Rubard on Sun Sep 3 13:57:29 2023
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not
    H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.00001
    gram or less of hydrogen and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.
    Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"

    Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeffrey Rubard@21:1/5 to Jeffrey Rubard on Mon Sep 4 11:42:55 2023
    On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not
    H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.00001
    gram or less of hydrogen and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.
    Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"
    Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."

    "No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeffrey Rubard@21:1/5 to Jeffrey Rubard on Tue Sep 5 08:40:28 2023
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 11:43:00 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O
    not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.
    00001 gram or less of hydrogen and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.
    Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"
    Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
    "No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."

    Wider World: Yeah, I've seen many of these 'joke bits' *decades in the past*, guys. It's not 'all new to me'.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeffrey Rubard@21:1/5 to Jeffrey Rubard on Wed Sep 6 08:36:21 2023
    On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 8:40:31 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 11:43:00 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O
    not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.
    00001 gram or less of hydrogen and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.
    Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"
    Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
    "No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."
    Wider World: Yeah, I've seen many of these 'joke bits' *decades in the past*, guys. It's not 'all new to me'.

    No, it really isn't.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeffrey Rubard@21:1/5 to Jeffrey Rubard on Fri Sep 8 08:33:49 2023
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 8:36:26 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 8:40:31 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 11:43:00 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is
    H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.
    00001 gram or less of hydrogen and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.
    Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"
    Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
    "No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."
    Wider World: Yeah, I've seen many of these 'joke bits' *decades in the past*, guys. It's not 'all new to me'.
    No, it really isn't.

    ...and they attribute 'magic powers' to their rhetorics that one oneself could really, really 'leave out of the equation'.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeffrey Rubard@21:1/5 to Jeffrey Rubard on Mon Sep 11 08:28:54 2023
    On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 8:33:52 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 8:36:26 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 8:40:31 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 11:43:00 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is
    H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.
    00001 gram or less of hydrogen and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.
    Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"
    Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
    "No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."
    Wider World: Yeah, I've seen many of these 'joke bits' *decades in the past*, guys. It's not 'all new to me'.
    No, it really isn't.
    ...and they attribute 'magic powers' to their rhetorics that one oneself could really, really 'leave out of the equation'.

    "There is only fooling, and fooling always works." Most of us don't think so.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeffrey Rubard@21:1/5 to Jeffrey Rubard on Fri Sep 15 10:52:21 2023
    On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:28:59 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 8:33:52 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 8:36:26 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 8:40:31 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 11:43:00 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water
    is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand,
    0.00001 gram or less of hydrogen and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.
    Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"
    Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
    "No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."
    Wider World: Yeah, I've seen many of these 'joke bits' *decades in the past*, guys. It's not 'all new to me'.
    No, it really isn't.
    ...and they attribute 'magic powers' to their rhetorics that one oneself could really, really 'leave out of the equation'.
    "There is only fooling, and fooling always works." Most of us don't think so.

    (People who could not see another side to *On the Genealogy of Morality*, etc.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeffrey Rubard@21:1/5 to Jeffrey Rubard on Thu Sep 21 15:29:59 2023
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:52:25 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:28:59 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 8:33:52 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 8:36:26 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 8:40:31 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 11:43:00 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving
    Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at
    hand, 0.00001 gram or less of hydrogen and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.
    Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"
    Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
    "No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."
    Wider World: Yeah, I've seen many of these 'joke bits' *decades in the past*, guys. It's not 'all new to me'.
    No, it really isn't.
    ...and they attribute 'magic powers' to their rhetorics that one oneself could really, really 'leave out of the equation'.
    "There is only fooling, and fooling always works." Most of us don't think so.
    (People who could not see another side to *On the Genealogy of Morality*, etc.)

    Please don't 'sign my name' to stuff, etc.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeffrey Rubard@21:1/5 to Jeffrey Rubard on Fri Sep 22 08:24:08 2023
    On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 3:30:03 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:52:25 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:28:59 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 8:33:52 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 8:36:26 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 8:40:31 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 11:43:00 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving
    Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at
    hand, 0.00001 gram or less of hydrogen and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.
    Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"
    Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
    "No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."
    Wider World: Yeah, I've seen many of these 'joke bits' *decades in the past*, guys. It's not 'all new to me'.
    No, it really isn't.
    ...and they attribute 'magic powers' to their rhetorics that one oneself could really, really 'leave out of the equation'.
    "There is only fooling, and fooling always works." Most of us don't think so.
    (People who could not see another side to *On the Genealogy of Morality*, etc.)
    Please don't 'sign my name' to stuff, etc.

    "Pretty please?"
    It's more or less legally required, thanks.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeffrey Rubard@21:1/5 to Jeffrey Rubard on Tue Sep 26 08:30:42 2023
    On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 8:24:11 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 3:30:03 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:52:25 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:28:59 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 8:33:52 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 8:36:26 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 8:40:31 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 11:43:00 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving
    Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at
    hand, 0.00001 gram or less of hydrogen and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.
    Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"
    Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
    "No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."
    Wider World: Yeah, I've seen many of these 'joke bits' *decades in the past*, guys. It's not 'all new to me'.
    No, it really isn't.
    ...and they attribute 'magic powers' to their rhetorics that one oneself could really, really 'leave out of the equation'.
    "There is only fooling, and fooling always works." Most of us don't think so.
    (People who could not see another side to *On the Genealogy of Morality*, etc.)
    Please don't 'sign my name' to stuff, etc.
    "Pretty please?"
    It's more or less legally required, thanks.

    No, 'forgery is not a thing', really.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeffrey Rubard@21:1/5 to Jeffrey Rubard on Wed Sep 27 15:09:55 2023
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 8:30:46 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 8:24:11 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 3:30:03 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:52:25 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:28:59 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 8:33:52 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 8:36:26 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 8:40:31 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 11:43:00 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water,
    proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for
    the job at hand, 0.00001 gram or less of hydrogen and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.
    Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"
    Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
    "No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."
    Wider World: Yeah, I've seen many of these 'joke bits' *decades in the past*, guys. It's not 'all new to me'.
    No, it really isn't.
    ...and they attribute 'magic powers' to their rhetorics that one oneself could really, really 'leave out of the equation'.
    "There is only fooling, and fooling always works." Most of us don't think so.
    (People who could not see another side to *On the Genealogy of Morality*, etc.)
    Please don't 'sign my name' to stuff, etc.
    "Pretty please?"
    It's more or less legally required, thanks.
    No, 'forgery is not a thing', really.

    "What is it, then?"
    A 'runabout inference ticket' for you to continually be becoming more expansive in thought and action, unfortunately.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeffrey Rubard@21:1/5 to Jeffrey Rubard on Fri Sep 29 13:26:05 2023
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 3:09:58 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 8:30:46 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 8:24:11 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 3:30:03 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:52:25 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:28:59 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 8:33:52 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 8:36:26 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 8:40:31 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 11:43:00 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water,
    proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for
    the job at hand, 0.00001 gram or less of hydrogen and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.
    Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"
    Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
    "No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."
    Wider World: Yeah, I've seen many of these 'joke bits' *decades in the past*, guys. It's not 'all new to me'.
    No, it really isn't.
    ...and they attribute 'magic powers' to their rhetorics that one oneself could really, really 'leave out of the equation'.
    "There is only fooling, and fooling always works." Most of us don't think so.
    (People who could not see another side to *On the Genealogy of Morality*, etc.)
    Please don't 'sign my name' to stuff, etc.
    "Pretty please?"
    It's more or less legally required, thanks.
    No, 'forgery is not a thing', really.
    "What is it, then?"
    A 'runabout inference ticket' for you to continually be becoming more expansive in thought and action, unfortunately.

    "That's a pretty speculative theory of what that is."
    Maybe really true. But about "speculation" in general...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeffrey Rubard@21:1/5 to Jeffrey Rubard on Sat Sep 30 11:21:19 2023
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 1:26:08 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 3:09:58 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 8:30:46 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 8:24:11 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 3:30:03 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:52:25 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:28:59 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 8:33:52 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 8:36:26 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 8:40:31 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 11:43:00 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water,
    proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for
    the job at hand, 0.00001 gram or less of hydrogen and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.
    Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"
    Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
    "No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."
    Wider World: Yeah, I've seen many of these 'joke bits' *decades in the past*, guys. It's not 'all new to me'.
    No, it really isn't.
    ...and they attribute 'magic powers' to their rhetorics that one oneself could really, really 'leave out of the equation'.
    "There is only fooling, and fooling always works." Most of us don't think so.
    (People who could not see another side to *On the Genealogy of Morality*, etc.)
    Please don't 'sign my name' to stuff, etc.
    "Pretty please?"
    It's more or less legally required, thanks.
    No, 'forgery is not a thing', really.
    "What is it, then?"
    A 'runabout inference ticket' for you to continually be becoming more expansive in thought and action, unfortunately.
    "That's a pretty speculative theory of what that is."
    Maybe really true. But about "speculation" in general...

    "Like my 'bright ideas' are not really so bright, keep that line of thinking going..."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)