"mentally ill"
Re: "imp of math"
"mentally ill"
Re:"barking fuckdog"
Woodlouse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
"Kim Jong Un's lackey"
y=5x^2 is a parabola, not a circle, tardboy.
First you don't know what an ellipse is, now you don't know what a
parabola or a circle are? I guess conic sections just aren't your thing.
+Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
3m views Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
law.Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
In Old Chemistry and Old Physics, their subatomic particles were do nothing and no function and no job particles that sit around as balls or whiz around the outside of balls doing nothing but pointless circling.
In New Physics and New Chemistry-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Every subatomic particle has a job a function a purpose as to the Laws of Electromagnetism--- Faraday law, Coulomb law, Ampere law, Capacitor
proton+muon. Thus, water molecule is not H2O but rather is H4O.A proton is a torus of 840MeV with 840 windings, while the muon is the true electron of Atoms and is encased inside the proton torus thrusting through and producing electricity-- magnetic monopoles.
The neutron of Atoms is a parallel plate capacitor storing the electricity of proton+muon and is skin cover on the outside of the proton torus in the form of parallel plates.
Can hydrogen be a Atom if it is just a proton+muon? No, all atoms require to have a capacitor such as at least one neutron. Thus the Hydrogen Atom is H2 where you have 2 proton+muon where 1 of the 2 proton+muon acts like a neutron to the other
oxygen and hydrogen".AP is waiting for experimental chemists and physicists to prove him correct that Water is H4O.
In the meantime we have Hydroxyl which in Old Chemistry, especially Biology is OH, while AP says that is wrong and that is really H2O.
Now glycerine is a hydroxyl with formula C3H8O3. And what I am thinking at this moment, is that hydroxyls will be an easier proof that Water is truly H4O, rather than wait for experimentalists to actually "weigh the electrolysis test tubes of
proportionality constant Z can be used:You see, with H4O as water, glycerine is C3(2 waters)O with an extra oxygen. If Water is H2O then glycerine is C3(4 waters) deficit O. It is missing an oxygen if water is H2O.
The reason glycerine is so effective as a skin ointment is because it has glycerine, the extra O oxygen. If water were H2O, then glycerine would be a missing oxygen and not a skin lotion that works, but makes skin even more dry.
Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
12:24 AM (13 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
--- quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
Perhaps there is only two Faraday laws on Electrolysis. I am looking at the one that states: Faraday's first law of electrolysis relates the mass of a substance liberated (or deposited) at an electrode to the electric charge used (Q). A
m = ZQ = (E/96485)(Q)
m = mass, Q = total charge rewritten as Q = I*t amperes x time in seconds.
This website gives an example: 5amps passed through molten Sodium Chloride for 3 hours. Calculate the mass of Sodium. E=23/1.
m = (23/96485) (5) (3*60*60) approx 12.87 grams.
--- end quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
Now has such a experiment been performed on Water to see how much atomic mass of hydrogen and of oxygen results??? If AP is correct, the formula of water is H4O, if Old Physics, Old Chemistry is correct the formula is H2O. So which is it???
AP
where H2 gets that expansion characteristic.No, sorry no, Faraday's Law of Electrolysis is not going to tell the correct mass of hydrogen.
Reading Wikipedia on Faraday's Electrolysis law.
--- quoting Wikipedia ---
A monovalent ion requires 1 electron for discharge, a divalent ion requires 2 electrons for discharge and so on. Thus, if x electrons flow,
x/v atoms are discharged.
So the mass m discharged is
m= (xM)/vN_A) = (QM)/(eN_A *v) = (QM) / (vF)
where
N_A is the Avogadro constant;
Q = xe is the total charge, equal to the number of electrons (x) times the elementary charge e;
F is the Faraday constant.
--- end quoting Wikipedia ---
No, the Faraday law of Electrolysis will not work on water with a correct answer, because H is not an atom but H2 is an Atom. And where one of the proton+muon converts to being a neutron to the other proton+muon.
So if Faraday's law of Electrolysis was applied to water, thinking it would deliver a true answer is mistaken because the one H converts to neutron.
So it appears that we need to directly measure the test tube of oxygen and the test tube of hydrogen by a direct mass measurement.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
1:14 AM (12 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
I doubt we can measure a test tube of hydrogen or test tube of oxygen, too small to determine the mass on some sort of weight scale.
But here is a possible lucrative idea. We should be able to get pure deuterium water. Then run the electrolysis. Collect the test tubes.
Now have some sort of balancing beam weight scale. Place the regular water of hydrogen test tube on one side, and place the deuterium water hydrogen test tube on other side. If they stay balanced, then AP is correct and Water is really H4O.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
1:48 AM (11 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Cosmic Rays from Sun
90% of Sun's cosmic rays are 840MeV proton+muon inside = H. The hydrogen Atom is H2 where one of the H proton+muon converts to being a neutron.
When these proton+muon hit Earth atmosphere, they can turn into pions and muons.
I commented that H alone is a subatomic particle and that makes sense in the idea that Sun's cosmic rays are 90% these proton+muon.
Now is interstellar hydrogen H2 and intergalactic hydrogen H2 formed when one H cosmic ray joins up with another H cosmic ray to form H2 atom?
Is this how we get H2 in outer space? From the splitting apart of H2 into H cosmic rays?
So how much of the Sun's hydrogen is H2 and how much is H ready to join with another H and reform back into H2. Probably little of the Sun's H is H alone, and the vast majority of the Sun's hydrogen is H2.
How much deuterium in the Sun? And it is a higher percentage than the deuterium in water on Earth?
AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
3:11 AM (10 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Water is the only known non-metallic substance that expands when if freezes; its density decreases and it expands approximately 9% by volume. (Source: web Lunar and Planetary Institute)
I have to wait for experimental chemists and physicists to weigh the mass of test tubes from electrolysis, as to the verdict-- water is H4O.
But until that news comes in, I will look for other means of proof.
So AP says that the H2 is not a molecule but is the hydrogen Atom itself, where one proton+muon converts to a neutron and capacitates the other proton+muon which undergo the Faraday law.
There are subatomic particles of H in the form of Cosmic Rays from the Sun, but most of the Sun's hydrogen is H2, and flips back and forth from H to rejoining to form H2. Some gets away from the Sun and is cosmic rays.
But H2 is an Atom and H is a fleeting subatomic particle.
So can I prove Water is H4O from the data of Spectral lines of H2 is the same as deuterium, only slight difference is that the deuterium is a full fledged neutron not a makeshift proton+muon of H.
I suspect that special trait of water freezing is a proof that Water is H4O. Because the 840MeV proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law acting as a makeshift neutron capacitor for the other 840MeV proton torus with muon inside, is
mindless H+ as being hydrogen Atom of H2.A neutron is a parallel plate capacitor and those plates can expand when frozen temperature occurs. As the temperature gets colder, those plates move further apart.
Now does deuterium which truly has a full neutron, does it expand also when frozen?? If so, does it expand as much as H2 which is 2 protons with 2 muons inside?
So comparing the freezing and expansion of the parallel plates of a neutron in deuterium with the freezing and expansion of one of the proton+muon that is acting as a makeshift neutron in H2.
If I can numbers correlate the H2 expansion with the Deuterium expansion would be a alternative proof that Water is really H4O and not H2O.
AP
to
So now on Blankenship's book "Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis", 2014, page 134, shows The structure of ATP, ADP, AMP. And within that structure are OH hydroxyls.
In New Chemistry, water is truly H4O, and where hydroxyls are now H2O. And we have first proof of this in the Figure 8.1 of Blankenship's "Chemical structure of ATP".
For in the lower left corner of the diagram, Blankenship has a H+ all alone, (really a mindless error) and has P surrounded by O-, O-, O and OH. The OH is really H2O for hydroxyls are H2O and water itself is H4O, and that would leave that
to realize that there is no HC, no H2C, no H3C, but starts with H4C, and that tells me water starts with H4O. Totally confident that Old Chemistry, Old Physics did electrolysis experiments and the moment they saw hydrogen test tube be 2x volume of oxygenThe world of physics and chemistry should drop what they are doing and weigh the electrolysis test tube of hydrogen and oxygen to discover the correct true formula of water is H4O.
AP is total confident, becuase an Atom cannot exist if it has no capacitor structure such as a neutron, or one of the H in H2 acting as a neutron. I am totally confident that Water formula is truly H4O. And I need look only to methane of H4C,
electrolysis of water.When water electrolysis is physics weighed, AP is confident that there are 4H per every one oxygen O. And that Water is truly H4O.
AP, King of Science
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
9:34 AM (15 minutes ago)
to
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 8:56:57 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
Now modern day physics and chemist experimenters can really do a marvelous job if they wanted to. For they could freeze the test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen to where they are liquid and compare liquids from water electrolysis.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
10:01 AM (5 hours ago)
to
So, what AP is saying here is that we do electrolysis of water. We collect the two test tubes, one with oxygen the other with hydrogen.
To prove Water is truly the formula H4O and not H2O we must weigh the masses of the two tubes to find that the ratio is 1 x 16amu to 4 x 1amu.
The silly grotesque science error of the past was to look at volumes in the two test tubes-- "Hey-- the hydrogen is twice the volume of oxygen so the formula of water is H2O".
No, way was that science good practice. For the correct formula of water needs to be measured by mass, by atomic mass units where Oxygen is 16amu and hydrogen is 1amu.
I suspect a balance beam scale is good enough to see the hydrogen test tube will be 1/4 as massive as the oxygen test tube. To get within precision of electronic weighing scale of 0.00001 gram we just have to make a larger test tube of
properties of solid methane is discussed near 20.48K and...AP is betting that the readings will be hydrogen test tube 1/4 the mass of oxygen test tube proving Water formula is truly H4O.
Old Physics and Old Chemistry is betting that the mass experiment will have the hydrogen test tube be 1/8 the mass of the oxygen test tube, proving Water formula is H2O.
AP does not have these precision equipment to conduct an at-home experiment of this nature.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
12:38 PM (4 hours ago)
to
So, once Water is found to actually be H4O, not H2O, we move on to methane, and ask the same question of its hydrogen bonds. Is Methane really that of H8C and not H4C.
Well, looking in the literature for anomalies to methane, I come across a arXiv "Low and high-temperature anomalies in the physical properties of solid methane "The anomalous behavior of thermodynamic, spectral, plastic, elastic and some other
AP wonders: if they can get methane to solid form, well, I am then hopeful that the mass of the molecule can be determined. Because if methane is truly H8C, that difference of H4 in atomic mass units would be very much noticeable difference.
Chemistry Europe--
"The Anomalous Deuterium Isotope Effect in the NMR Spectrum of Methane...
P Vermeeren, 2023
"The abnormally long and weak methylidyne C-H bond.."
"The C-H bond of the methylidyne radical, CH*, is abnormally long and weak, even longer and..."
AP asks, are these anomalies solved if we consider methane is actually H8C and not H4C?
AP
*Can_Dr.John Goodenough (chem),J.Rubard,Dr.Douglas Abraham, Dr.Prateek Agrawal, Dr.Wade Allison, --please--step into the Oxford Univ physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown labcannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.00001 gram or less of hydrogen
+Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
+Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
3m views Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
proton+muon. Thus, water molecule is not H2O but rather is H4O.Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
In Old Chemistry and Old Physics, their subatomic particles were do nothing and no function and no job particles that sit around as balls or whiz around the outside of balls doing nothing but pointless circling.
In New Physics and New Chemistry-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Every subatomic particle has a job a function a purpose as to the Laws of Electromagnetism--- Faraday law, Coulomb law, Ampere law, Capacitor law.
A proton is a torus of 840MeV with 840 windings, while the muon is the true electron of Atoms and is encased inside the proton torus thrusting through and producing electricity-- magnetic monopoles.
The neutron of Atoms is a parallel plate capacitor storing the electricity of proton+muon and is skin cover on the outside of the proton torus in the form of parallel plates.
Can hydrogen be a Atom if it is just a proton+muon? No, all atoms require to have a capacitor such as at least one neutron. Thus the Hydrogen Atom is H2 where you have 2 proton+muon where 1 of the 2 proton+muon acts like a neutron to the other
oxygen and hydrogen".AP is waiting for experimental chemists and physicists to prove him correct that Water is H4O.
In the meantime we have Hydroxyl which in Old Chemistry, especially Biology is OH, while AP says that is wrong and that is really H2O.
Now glycerine is a hydroxyl with formula C3H8O3. And what I am thinking at this moment, is that hydroxyls will be an easier proof that Water is truly H4O, rather than wait for experimentalists to actually "weigh the electrolysis test tubes of
proportionality constant Z can be used:You see, with H4O as water, glycerine is C3(2 waters)O with an extra oxygen. If Water is H2O then glycerine is C3(4 waters) deficit O. It is missing an oxygen if water is H2O.
The reason glycerine is so effective as a skin ointment is because it has glycerine, the extra O oxygen. If water were H2O, then glycerine would be a missing oxygen and not a skin lotion that works, but makes skin even more dry.
Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
12:24 AM (13 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
--- quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
Perhaps there is only two Faraday laws on Electrolysis. I am looking at the one that states: Faraday's first law of electrolysis relates the mass of a substance liberated (or deposited) at an electrode to the electric charge used (Q). A
m = ZQ = (E/96485)(Q)
m = mass, Q = total charge rewritten as Q = I*t amperes x time in seconds.
This website gives an example: 5amps passed through molten Sodium Chloride for 3 hours. Calculate the mass of Sodium. E=23/1.
m = (23/96485) (5) (3*60*60) approx 12.87 grams.
--- end quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
Now has such a experiment been performed on Water to see how much atomic mass of hydrogen and of oxygen results??? If AP is correct, the formula of water is H4O, if Old Physics, Old Chemistry is correct the formula is H2O. So which is it???
AP
where H2 gets that expansion characteristic.No, sorry no, Faraday's Law of Electrolysis is not going to tell the correct mass of hydrogen.
Reading Wikipedia on Faraday's Electrolysis law.
--- quoting Wikipedia ---
A monovalent ion requires 1 electron for discharge, a divalent ion requires 2 electrons for discharge and so on. Thus, if x electrons flow,
x/v atoms are discharged.
So the mass m discharged is
m= (xM)/vN_A) = (QM)/(eN_A *v) = (QM) / (vF)
where
N_A is the Avogadro constant;
Q = xe is the total charge, equal to the number of electrons (x) times the elementary charge e;
F is the Faraday constant.
--- end quoting Wikipedia ---
No, the Faraday law of Electrolysis will not work on water with a correct answer, because H is not an atom but H2 is an Atom. And where one of the proton+muon converts to being a neutron to the other proton+muon.
So if Faraday's law of Electrolysis was applied to water, thinking it would deliver a true answer is mistaken because the one H converts to neutron.
So it appears that we need to directly measure the test tube of oxygen and the test tube of hydrogen by a direct mass measurement.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
1:14 AM (12 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
I doubt we can measure a test tube of hydrogen or test tube of oxygen, too small to determine the mass on some sort of weight scale.
But here is a possible lucrative idea. We should be able to get pure deuterium water. Then run the electrolysis. Collect the test tubes.
Now have some sort of balancing beam weight scale. Place the regular water of hydrogen test tube on one side, and place the deuterium water hydrogen test tube on other side. If they stay balanced, then AP is correct and Water is really H4O.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
1:48 AM (11 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Cosmic Rays from Sun
90% of Sun's cosmic rays are 840MeV proton+muon inside = H. The hydrogen Atom is H2 where one of the H proton+muon converts to being a neutron.
When these proton+muon hit Earth atmosphere, they can turn into pions and muons.
I commented that H alone is a subatomic particle and that makes sense in the idea that Sun's cosmic rays are 90% these proton+muon.
Now is interstellar hydrogen H2 and intergalactic hydrogen H2 formed when one H cosmic ray joins up with another H cosmic ray to form H2 atom?
Is this how we get H2 in outer space? From the splitting apart of H2 into H cosmic rays?
So how much of the Sun's hydrogen is H2 and how much is H ready to join with another H and reform back into H2. Probably little of the Sun's H is H alone, and the vast majority of the Sun's hydrogen is H2.
How much deuterium in the Sun? And it is a higher percentage than the deuterium in water on Earth?
AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
3:11 AM (10 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Water is the only known non-metallic substance that expands when if freezes; its density decreases and it expands approximately 9% by volume. (Source: web Lunar and Planetary Institute)
I have to wait for experimental chemists and physicists to weigh the mass of test tubes from electrolysis, as to the verdict-- water is H4O.
But until that news comes in, I will look for other means of proof.
So AP says that the H2 is not a molecule but is the hydrogen Atom itself, where one proton+muon converts to a neutron and capacitates the other proton+muon which undergo the Faraday law.
There are subatomic particles of H in the form of Cosmic Rays from the Sun, but most of the Sun's hydrogen is H2, and flips back and forth from H to rejoining to form H2. Some gets away from the Sun and is cosmic rays.
But H2 is an Atom and H is a fleeting subatomic particle.
So can I prove Water is H4O from the data of Spectral lines of H2 is the same as deuterium, only slight difference is that the deuterium is a full fledged neutron not a makeshift proton+muon of H.
I suspect that special trait of water freezing is a proof that Water is H4O. Because the 840MeV proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law acting as a makeshift neutron capacitor for the other 840MeV proton torus with muon inside, is
mindless H+ as being hydrogen Atom of H2.A neutron is a parallel plate capacitor and those plates can expand when frozen temperature occurs. As the temperature gets colder, those plates move further apart.
Now does deuterium which truly has a full neutron, does it expand also when frozen?? If so, does it expand as much as H2 which is 2 protons with 2 muons inside?
So comparing the freezing and expansion of the parallel plates of a neutron in deuterium with the freezing and expansion of one of the proton+muon that is acting as a makeshift neutron in H2.
If I can numbers correlate the H2 expansion with the Deuterium expansion would be a alternative proof that Water is really H4O and not H2O.
AP
to
So now on Blankenship's book "Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis", 2014, page 134, shows The structure of ATP, ADP, AMP. And within that structure are OH hydroxyls.
In New Chemistry, water is truly H4O, and where hydroxyls are now H2O. And we have first proof of this in the Figure 8.1 of Blankenship's "Chemical structure of ATP".
For in the lower left corner of the diagram, Blankenship has a H+ all alone, (really a mindless error) and has P surrounded by O-, O-, O and OH. The OH is really H2O for hydroxyls are H2O and water itself is H4O, and that would leave that
realize that there is no HC, no H2C, no H3C, but starts with H4C, and that tells me water starts with H4O. Totally confident that Old Chemistry, Old Physics did electrolysis experiments and the moment they saw hydrogen test tube be 2x volume of oxygenThe world of physics and chemistry should drop what they are doing and weigh the electrolysis test tube of hydrogen and oxygen to discover the correct true formula of water is H4O.
AP is total confident, becuase an Atom cannot exist if it has no capacitor structure such as a neutron, or one of the H in H2 acting as a neutron. I am totally confident that Water formula is truly H4O. And I need look only to methane of H4C, to
electrolysis of water.When water electrolysis is physics weighed, AP is confident that there are 4H per every one oxygen O. And that Water is truly H4O.
AP, King of Science
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
9:34 AM (15 minutes ago)
to
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 8:56:57 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
Now modern day physics and chemist experimenters can really do a marvelous job if they wanted to. For they could freeze the test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen to where they are liquid and compare liquids from water electrolysis.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
10:01 AM (5 hours ago)
to
So, what AP is saying here is that we do electrolysis of water. We collect the two test tubes, one with oxygen the other with hydrogen.
To prove Water is truly the formula H4O and not H2O we must weigh the masses of the two tubes to find that the ratio is 1 x 16amu to 4 x 1amu.
The silly grotesque science error of the past was to look at volumes in the two test tubes-- "Hey-- the hydrogen is twice the volume of oxygen so the formula of water is H2O".
No, way was that science good practice. For the correct formula of water needs to be measured by mass, by atomic mass units where Oxygen is 16amu and hydrogen is 1amu.
I suspect a balance beam scale is good enough to see the hydrogen test tube will be 1/4 as massive as the oxygen test tube. To get within precision of electronic weighing scale of 0.00001 gram we just have to make a larger test tube of
properties of solid methane is discussed near 20.48K and...AP is betting that the readings will be hydrogen test tube 1/4 the mass of oxygen test tube proving Water formula is truly H4O.
Old Physics and Old Chemistry is betting that the mass experiment will have the hydrogen test tube be 1/8 the mass of the oxygen test tube, proving Water formula is H2O.
AP does not have these precision equipment to conduct an at-home experiment of this nature.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
12:38 PM (4 hours ago)
to
So, once Water is found to actually be H4O, not H2O, we move on to methane, and ask the same question of its hydrogen bonds. Is Methane really that of H8C and not H4C.
Well, looking in the literature for anomalies to methane, I come across a arXiv "Low and high-temperature anomalies in the physical properties of solid methane "The anomalous behavior of thermodynamic, spectral, plastic, elastic and some other
AP wonders: if they can get methane to solid form, well, I am then hopeful that the mass of the molecule can be determined. Because if methane is truly H8C, that difference of H4 in atomic mass units would be very much noticeable difference.
Chemistry Europe--
"The Anomalous Deuterium Isotope Effect in the NMR Spectrum of Methane...
P Vermeeren, 2023
"The abnormally long and weak methylidyne C-H bond.."
"The C-H bond of the methylidyne radical, CH*, is abnormally long and weak, even longer and..."
AP asks, are these anomalies solved if we consider methane is actually H8C and not H4C?
AP
My 250th published book.with date-time markers, and fact telling. And there are no problem sets. This book is intended for 1st year college. Until I include problem sets and exercises, I leave it to the professor and instructor to provide such. And also, chemistry is hugely a
TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY; H2 is the hydrogen Atom and water is H4O, not H2O// Chemistry
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
Prologue: This textbook is 1/2 research history and 1/2 factual textbook combined as one textbook. For many of the experiments described here-in have not yet been performed, such as water is really H4O not H2O. Written in a style of history research
Preface: This is my 250th book of science, and the first of my textbooks on Teaching True Chemistry. I have completed the Teaching True Physics and the Teaching True Mathematics textbook series. But had not yet started on a Teaching True Chemistrytextbook series. What got me started on this project is the fact that no chemistry textbook had the correct formula for water which is actually H4O and not H2O. Leaving the true formula for hydroxyl groups as H2O and not OH. But none of this is possible
Cover Picture: Sorry for the crude sketch work but chemistry and physics students are going to have to learn to make such sketches in a minute or less. Just as they make Lewis diagrams or ball & stick diagrams. My 4-5 minute sketch-work of the Watermolecule H4O plus the subatomic particle H, and the hydrogen atom H2. Showing how one H is a proton torus with muon inside (blue color) doing the Faraday law. Protons are toruses with many windings. Protons are the coils in Faraday law while muons are
Product details
• ASIN : B0CCLPTBDG
• Publication date : July 21, 2023
• Language : English
• File size : 788 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
• Print length : 168 pages
y z
| /
| /
|/______ x
Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP'shomegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.00001 gram or less
Univ. Pittsburgh, Dr. Patrick D.Gallagher (physics), Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau,Dr.Daniel Boyanovsky,Dr.Wolfgang J. Choyke,Dr.Anthony H.Duncan,Dr.Steven A.Dytman,Dr. Eugene Engels,Dr.George G. Gatewood,Dr.Tao Han,Dr.Allen I.Janis,Dr.David Jasnow, Dr.Rainer Johnsen,Dr.Peter F.M.Koehler, Dr.Arthur Kosowsky,Dr.John Cooper, Dr.Alexander Deiters,Dr. Angela M Gronenborn,Dr.Sethe Horne,Dr. Sunil Saxena,Dr.Peter Wipf
Jeffrey Rubard (pronounced rhubarb) wonders how on Earth the Univ Pittsburgh Thomas Hales can claim to prove Kepler Packing when he never defines "infinity" in his fake proof (see AP's true proof below). But furthermore, Dr.Hales is such a failure ofmath that to this very day, he believes a slant cut of right circular cone is a ellipse, when in truth it is a oval, and Mr. Rubard also is complaining of this, for even the High School kids in the Pittsburgh area can take a paper cone (roll up a paper)
Jeffrey Rubard wrote:cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.00001 gram or less of hydrogen
unread,
Aug 8, 2023, 2:15:58 PM (yesterday)
to sci.math
On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 1:42:39 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
*Can_Dr.John Goodenough (chem),J.Rubard,Dr.Douglas Abraham, Dr.Prateek Agrawal, Dr.Wade Allison, --please--step into the Oxford Univ physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab
Intellectual Fraud, Simply: "Technically it's quite illegal to include Mr. Rubard in this 'laundry list' of spurious experts... no, at all."
Jeffrey Rubard's profile photo
Jeffrey Rubard
unread,
11:10 AM (3 hours ago)
to sci.math
Wider World: "Yeah, you guys are pretty credulous about this 'snookering' stuff, it's like you're the ones being 'taken in'."
+Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
+Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
3m views Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
law.Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
In Old Chemistry and Old Physics, their subatomic particles were do nothing and no function and no job particles that sit around as balls or whiz around the outside of balls doing nothing but pointless circling.
In New Physics and New Chemistry-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Every subatomic particle has a job a function a purpose as to the Laws of Electromagnetism--- Faraday law, Coulomb law, Ampere law, Capacitor
proton+muon. Thus, water molecule is not H2O but rather is H4O.A proton is a torus of 840MeV with 840 windings, while the muon is the true electron of Atoms and is encased inside the proton torus thrusting through and producing electricity-- magnetic monopoles.
The neutron of Atoms is a parallel plate capacitor storing the electricity of proton+muon and is skin cover on the outside of the proton torus in the form of parallel plates.
Can hydrogen be a Atom if it is just a proton+muon? No, all atoms require to have a capacitor such as at least one neutron. Thus the Hydrogen Atom is H2 where you have 2 proton+muon where 1 of the 2 proton+muon acts like a neutron to the other
oxygen and hydrogen".AP is waiting for experimental chemists and physicists to prove him correct that Water is H4O.
In the meantime we have Hydroxyl which in Old Chemistry, especially Biology is OH, while AP says that is wrong and that is really H2O.
Now glycerine is a hydroxyl with formula C3H8O3. And what I am thinking at this moment, is that hydroxyls will be an easier proof that Water is truly H4O, rather than wait for experimentalists to actually "weigh the electrolysis test tubes of
proportionality constant Z can be used:You see, with H4O as water, glycerine is C3(2 waters)O with an extra oxygen. If Water is H2O then glycerine is C3(4 waters) deficit O. It is missing an oxygen if water is H2O.
The reason glycerine is so effective as a skin ointment is because it has glycerine, the extra O oxygen. If water were H2O, then glycerine would be a missing oxygen and not a skin lotion that works, but makes skin even more dry.
Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
12:24 AM (13 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
--- quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
Perhaps there is only two Faraday laws on Electrolysis. I am looking at the one that states: Faraday's first law of electrolysis relates the mass of a substance liberated (or deposited) at an electrode to the electric charge used (Q). A
m = ZQ = (E/96485)(Q)
m = mass, Q = total charge rewritten as Q = I*t amperes x time in seconds.
This website gives an example: 5amps passed through molten Sodium Chloride for 3 hours. Calculate the mass of Sodium. E=23/1.
m = (23/96485) (5) (3*60*60) approx 12.87 grams.
--- end quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
Now has such a experiment been performed on Water to see how much atomic mass of hydrogen and of oxygen results??? If AP is correct, the formula of water is H4O, if Old Physics, Old Chemistry is correct the formula is H2O. So which is it???
AP
where H2 gets that expansion characteristic.No, sorry no, Faraday's Law of Electrolysis is not going to tell the correct mass of hydrogen.
Reading Wikipedia on Faraday's Electrolysis law.
--- quoting Wikipedia ---
A monovalent ion requires 1 electron for discharge, a divalent ion requires 2 electrons for discharge and so on. Thus, if x electrons flow,
x/v atoms are discharged.
So the mass m discharged is
m= (xM)/vN_A) = (QM)/(eN_A *v) = (QM) / (vF)
where
N_A is the Avogadro constant;
Q = xe is the total charge, equal to the number of electrons (x) times the elementary charge e;
F is the Faraday constant.
--- end quoting Wikipedia ---
No, the Faraday law of Electrolysis will not work on water with a correct answer, because H is not an atom but H2 is an Atom. And where one of the proton+muon converts to being a neutron to the other proton+muon.
So if Faraday's law of Electrolysis was applied to water, thinking it would deliver a true answer is mistaken because the one H converts to neutron.
So it appears that we need to directly measure the test tube of oxygen and the test tube of hydrogen by a direct mass measurement.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
1:14 AM (12 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
I doubt we can measure a test tube of hydrogen or test tube of oxygen, too small to determine the mass on some sort of weight scale.
But here is a possible lucrative idea. We should be able to get pure deuterium water. Then run the electrolysis. Collect the test tubes.
Now have some sort of balancing beam weight scale. Place the regular water of hydrogen test tube on one side, and place the deuterium water hydrogen test tube on other side. If they stay balanced, then AP is correct and Water is really H4O.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
1:48 AM (11 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Cosmic Rays from Sun
90% of Sun's cosmic rays are 840MeV proton+muon inside = H. The hydrogen Atom is H2 where one of the H proton+muon converts to being a neutron.
When these proton+muon hit Earth atmosphere, they can turn into pions and muons.
I commented that H alone is a subatomic particle and that makes sense in the idea that Sun's cosmic rays are 90% these proton+muon.
Now is interstellar hydrogen H2 and intergalactic hydrogen H2 formed when one H cosmic ray joins up with another H cosmic ray to form H2 atom?
Is this how we get H2 in outer space? From the splitting apart of H2 into H cosmic rays?
So how much of the Sun's hydrogen is H2 and how much is H ready to join with another H and reform back into H2. Probably little of the Sun's H is H alone, and the vast majority of the Sun's hydrogen is H2.
How much deuterium in the Sun? And it is a higher percentage than the deuterium in water on Earth?
AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
3:11 AM (10 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Water is the only known non-metallic substance that expands when if freezes; its density decreases and it expands approximately 9% by volume. (Source: web Lunar and Planetary Institute)
I have to wait for experimental chemists and physicists to weigh the mass of test tubes from electrolysis, as to the verdict-- water is H4O.
But until that news comes in, I will look for other means of proof.
So AP says that the H2 is not a molecule but is the hydrogen Atom itself, where one proton+muon converts to a neutron and capacitates the other proton+muon which undergo the Faraday law.
There are subatomic particles of H in the form of Cosmic Rays from the Sun, but most of the Sun's hydrogen is H2, and flips back and forth from H to rejoining to form H2. Some gets away from the Sun and is cosmic rays.
But H2 is an Atom and H is a fleeting subatomic particle.
So can I prove Water is H4O from the data of Spectral lines of H2 is the same as deuterium, only slight difference is that the deuterium is a full fledged neutron not a makeshift proton+muon of H.
I suspect that special trait of water freezing is a proof that Water is H4O. Because the 840MeV proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law acting as a makeshift neutron capacitor for the other 840MeV proton torus with muon inside, is
mindless H+ as being hydrogen Atom of H2.A neutron is a parallel plate capacitor and those plates can expand when frozen temperature occurs. As the temperature gets colder, those plates move further apart.
Now does deuterium which truly has a full neutron, does it expand also when frozen?? If so, does it expand as much as H2 which is 2 protons with 2 muons inside?
So comparing the freezing and expansion of the parallel plates of a neutron in deuterium with the freezing and expansion of one of the proton+muon that is acting as a makeshift neutron in H2.
If I can numbers correlate the H2 expansion with the Deuterium expansion would be a alternative proof that Water is really H4O and not H2O.
AP
to
So now on Blankenship's book "Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis", 2014, page 134, shows The structure of ATP, ADP, AMP. And within that structure are OH hydroxyls.
In New Chemistry, water is truly H4O, and where hydroxyls are now H2O. And we have first proof of this in the Figure 8.1 of Blankenship's "Chemical structure of ATP".
For in the lower left corner of the diagram, Blankenship has a H+ all alone, (really a mindless error) and has P surrounded by O-, O-, O and OH. The OH is really H2O for hydroxyls are H2O and water itself is H4O, and that would leave that
to realize that there is no HC, no H2C, no H3C, but starts with H4C, and that tells me water starts with H4O. Totally confident that Old Chemistry, Old Physics did electrolysis experiments and the moment they saw hydrogen test tube be 2x volume of oxygenThe world of physics and chemistry should drop what they are doing and weigh the electrolysis test tube of hydrogen and oxygen to discover the correct true formula of water is H4O.
AP is total confident, becuase an Atom cannot exist if it has no capacitor structure such as a neutron, or one of the H in H2 acting as a neutron. I am totally confident that Water formula is truly H4O. And I need look only to methane of H4C,
electrolysis of water.When water electrolysis is physics weighed, AP is confident that there are 4H per every one oxygen O. And that Water is truly H4O.
AP, King of Science
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
9:34 AM (15 minutes ago)
to
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 8:56:57 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
Now modern day physics and chemist experimenters can really do a marvelous job if they wanted to. For they could freeze the test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen to where they are liquid and compare liquids from water electrolysis.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
10:01 AM (5 hours ago)
to
So, what AP is saying here is that we do electrolysis of water. We collect the two test tubes, one with oxygen the other with hydrogen.
To prove Water is truly the formula H4O and not H2O we must weigh the masses of the two tubes to find that the ratio is 1 x 16amu to 4 x 1amu.
The silly grotesque science error of the past was to look at volumes in the two test tubes-- "Hey-- the hydrogen is twice the volume of oxygen so the formula of water is H2O".
No, way was that science good practice. For the correct formula of water needs to be measured by mass, by atomic mass units where Oxygen is 16amu and hydrogen is 1amu.
I suspect a balance beam scale is good enough to see the hydrogen test tube will be 1/4 as massive as the oxygen test tube. To get within precision of electronic weighing scale of 0.00001 gram we just have to make a larger test tube of
properties of solid methane is discussed near 20.48K and...AP is betting that the readings will be hydrogen test tube 1/4 the mass of oxygen test tube proving Water formula is truly H4O.
Old Physics and Old Chemistry is betting that the mass experiment will have the hydrogen test tube be 1/8 the mass of the oxygen test tube, proving Water formula is H2O.
AP does not have these precision equipment to conduct an at-home experiment of this nature.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
12:38 PM (4 hours ago)
to
So, once Water is found to actually be H4O, not H2O, we move on to methane, and ask the same question of its hydrogen bonds. Is Methane really that of H8C and not H4C.
Well, looking in the literature for anomalies to methane, I come across a arXiv "Low and high-temperature anomalies in the physical properties of solid methane "The anomalous behavior of thermodynamic, spectral, plastic, elastic and some other
AP wonders: if they can get methane to solid form, well, I am then hopeful that the mass of the molecule can be determined. Because if methane is truly H8C, that difference of H4 in atomic mass units would be very much noticeable difference.
Chemistry Europe--
"The Anomalous Deuterium Isotope Effect in the NMR Spectrum of Methane...
P Vermeeren, 2023
"The abnormally long and weak methylidyne C-H bond.."
"The C-H bond of the methylidyne radical, CH*, is abnormally long and weak, even longer and..."
AP asks, are these anomalies solved if we consider methane is actually H8C and not H4C?
AP
with date-time markers, and fact telling. And there are no problem sets. This book is intended for 1st year college. Until I include problem sets and exercises, I leave it to the professor and instructor to provide such. And also, chemistry is hugely aMy 250th published book.
TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY; H2 is the hydrogen Atom and water is H4O, not H2O// Chemistry
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
Prologue: This textbook is 1/2 research history and 1/2 factual textbook combined as one textbook. For many of the experiments described here-in have not yet been performed, such as water is really H4O not H2O. Written in a style of history research
textbook series. What got me started on this project is the fact that no chemistry textbook had the correct formula for water which is actually H4O and not H2O. Leaving the true formula for hydroxyl groups as H2O and not OH. But none of this is possiblePreface: This is my 250th book of science, and the first of my textbooks on Teaching True Chemistry. I have completed the Teaching True Physics and the Teaching True Mathematics textbook series. But had not yet started on a Teaching True Chemistry
molecule H4O plus the subatomic particle H, and the hydrogen atom H2. Showing how one H is a proton torus with muon inside (blue color) doing the Faraday law. Protons are toruses with many windings. Protons are the coils in Faraday law while muons areCover Picture: Sorry for the crude sketch work but chemistry and physics students are going to have to learn to make such sketches in a minute or less. Just as they make Lewis diagrams or ball & stick diagrams. My 4-5 minute sketch-work of the Water
Product details
• ASIN : B0CCLPTBDG
• Publication date : July 21, 2023
• Language : English
• File size : 788 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
• Print length : 168 pages
Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.y zMy 3rd published book
| /
| /
|/______ x
AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
#12-2, My 11th published book
World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science. Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof.
Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising thatmost math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a
To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove aFTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a
Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1309 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 154 pages
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
My 24th published book
World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
Univ. Pittsburgh, Dr. Patrick D.Gallagher (physics), Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau,Dr.Daniel Boyanovsky,Dr.Wolfgang J. Choyke,Dr.Anthony H.Duncan,Dr.Steven A.Dytman,Dr. Eugene Engels,Dr.George G. Gatewood,Dr.Tao Han,Dr.Allen I.Janis,Dr.David Jasnow, Dr.Rainer Johnsen,Dr.Peter F.M.Koehler, Dr.Arthur Kosowsky,Dr.John Cooper, Dr.Alexander Deiters,Dr. Angela M Gronenborn,Dr.Sethe Horne,Dr. Sunil Saxena,Dr.Peter Wipf
Jeffrey Rubard (pronounced rhubarb) wonders how on Earth the Univ Pittsburgh Thomas Hales can claim to prove Kepler Packing when he never defines "infinity" in his fake proof (see AP's true proof below). But furthermore, Dr.Hales is such a failure ofmath that to this very day, he believes a slant cut of right circular cone is a ellipse, when in truth it is a oval, and Mr. Rubard also is complaining of this, for even the High School kids in the Pittsburgh area can take a paper cone (roll up a paper)
Jeffrey Rubard wrote:cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.00001 gram or less of hydrogen
unread,
Aug 8, 2023, 2:15:58 PM (yesterday)
to sci.math
On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 1:42:39 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
*Can_Dr.John Goodenough (chem),J.Rubard,Dr.Douglas Abraham, Dr.Prateek Agrawal, Dr.Wade Allison, --please--step into the Oxford Univ physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab
Intellectual Fraud, Simply: "Technically it's quite illegal to include Mr. Rubard in this 'laundry list' of spurious experts... no, at all."
Jeffrey Rubard's profile photo
Jeffrey Rubard
unread,
11:10 AM (3 hours ago)
to sci.math
Wider World: "Yeah, you guys are pretty credulous about this 'snookering' stuff, it's like you're the ones being 'taken in'."
+Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
+Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
3m views Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
law.Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
In Old Chemistry and Old Physics, their subatomic particles were do nothing and no function and no job particles that sit around as balls or whiz around the outside of balls doing nothing but pointless circling.
In New Physics and New Chemistry-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Every subatomic particle has a job a function a purpose as to the Laws of Electromagnetism--- Faraday law, Coulomb law, Ampere law, Capacitor
proton+muon. Thus, water molecule is not H2O but rather is H4O.A proton is a torus of 840MeV with 840 windings, while the muon is the true electron of Atoms and is encased inside the proton torus thrusting through and producing electricity-- magnetic monopoles.
The neutron of Atoms is a parallel plate capacitor storing the electricity of proton+muon and is skin cover on the outside of the proton torus in the form of parallel plates.
Can hydrogen be a Atom if it is just a proton+muon? No, all atoms require to have a capacitor such as at least one neutron. Thus the Hydrogen Atom is H2 where you have 2 proton+muon where 1 of the 2 proton+muon acts like a neutron to the other
oxygen and hydrogen".AP is waiting for experimental chemists and physicists to prove him correct that Water is H4O.
In the meantime we have Hydroxyl which in Old Chemistry, especially Biology is OH, while AP says that is wrong and that is really H2O.
Now glycerine is a hydroxyl with formula C3H8O3. And what I am thinking at this moment, is that hydroxyls will be an easier proof that Water is truly H4O, rather than wait for experimentalists to actually "weigh the electrolysis test tubes of
proportionality constant Z can be used:You see, with H4O as water, glycerine is C3(2 waters)O with an extra oxygen. If Water is H2O then glycerine is C3(4 waters) deficit O. It is missing an oxygen if water is H2O.
The reason glycerine is so effective as a skin ointment is because it has glycerine, the extra O oxygen. If water were H2O, then glycerine would be a missing oxygen and not a skin lotion that works, but makes skin even more dry.
Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
12:24 AM (13 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
--- quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
Perhaps there is only two Faraday laws on Electrolysis. I am looking at the one that states: Faraday's first law of electrolysis relates the mass of a substance liberated (or deposited) at an electrode to the electric charge used (Q). A
m = ZQ = (E/96485)(Q)
m = mass, Q = total charge rewritten as Q = I*t amperes x time in seconds.
This website gives an example: 5amps passed through molten Sodium Chloride for 3 hours. Calculate the mass of Sodium. E=23/1.
m = (23/96485) (5) (3*60*60) approx 12.87 grams.
--- end quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
Now has such a experiment been performed on Water to see how much atomic mass of hydrogen and of oxygen results??? If AP is correct, the formula of water is H4O, if Old Physics, Old Chemistry is correct the formula is H2O. So which is it???
AP
where H2 gets that expansion characteristic.No, sorry no, Faraday's Law of Electrolysis is not going to tell the correct mass of hydrogen.
Reading Wikipedia on Faraday's Electrolysis law.
--- quoting Wikipedia ---
A monovalent ion requires 1 electron for discharge, a divalent ion requires 2 electrons for discharge and so on. Thus, if x electrons flow,
x/v atoms are discharged.
So the mass m discharged is
m= (xM)/vN_A) = (QM)/(eN_A *v) = (QM) / (vF)
where
N_A is the Avogadro constant;
Q = xe is the total charge, equal to the number of electrons (x) times the elementary charge e;
F is the Faraday constant.
--- end quoting Wikipedia ---
No, the Faraday law of Electrolysis will not work on water with a correct answer, because H is not an atom but H2 is an Atom. And where one of the proton+muon converts to being a neutron to the other proton+muon.
So if Faraday's law of Electrolysis was applied to water, thinking it would deliver a true answer is mistaken because the one H converts to neutron.
So it appears that we need to directly measure the test tube of oxygen and the test tube of hydrogen by a direct mass measurement.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
1:14 AM (12 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
I doubt we can measure a test tube of hydrogen or test tube of oxygen, too small to determine the mass on some sort of weight scale.
But here is a possible lucrative idea. We should be able to get pure deuterium water. Then run the electrolysis. Collect the test tubes.
Now have some sort of balancing beam weight scale. Place the regular water of hydrogen test tube on one side, and place the deuterium water hydrogen test tube on other side. If they stay balanced, then AP is correct and Water is really H4O.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
1:48 AM (11 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Cosmic Rays from Sun
90% of Sun's cosmic rays are 840MeV proton+muon inside = H. The hydrogen Atom is H2 where one of the H proton+muon converts to being a neutron.
When these proton+muon hit Earth atmosphere, they can turn into pions and muons.
I commented that H alone is a subatomic particle and that makes sense in the idea that Sun's cosmic rays are 90% these proton+muon.
Now is interstellar hydrogen H2 and intergalactic hydrogen H2 formed when one H cosmic ray joins up with another H cosmic ray to form H2 atom?
Is this how we get H2 in outer space? From the splitting apart of H2 into H cosmic rays?
So how much of the Sun's hydrogen is H2 and how much is H ready to join with another H and reform back into H2. Probably little of the Sun's H is H alone, and the vast majority of the Sun's hydrogen is H2.
How much deuterium in the Sun? And it is a higher percentage than the deuterium in water on Earth?
AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<[email protected]>
3:11 AM (10 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Water is the only known non-metallic substance that expands when if freezes; its density decreases and it expands approximately 9% by volume. (Source: web Lunar and Planetary Institute)
I have to wait for experimental chemists and physicists to weigh the mass of test tubes from electrolysis, as to the verdict-- water is H4O.
But until that news comes in, I will look for other means of proof.
So AP says that the H2 is not a molecule but is the hydrogen Atom itself, where one proton+muon converts to a neutron and capacitates the other proton+muon which undergo the Faraday law.
There are subatomic particles of H in the form of Cosmic Rays from the Sun, but most of the Sun's hydrogen is H2, and flips back and forth from H to rejoining to form H2. Some gets away from the Sun and is cosmic rays.
But H2 is an Atom and H is a fleeting subatomic particle.
So can I prove Water is H4O from the data of Spectral lines of H2 is the same as deuterium, only slight difference is that the deuterium is a full fledged neutron not a makeshift proton+muon of H.
I suspect that special trait of water freezing is a proof that Water is H4O. Because the 840MeV proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law acting as a makeshift neutron capacitor for the other 840MeV proton torus with muon inside, is
mindless H+ as being hydrogen Atom of H2.A neutron is a parallel plate capacitor and those plates can expand when frozen temperature occurs. As the temperature gets colder, those plates move further apart.
Now does deuterium which truly has a full neutron, does it expand also when frozen?? If so, does it expand as much as H2 which is 2 protons with 2 muons inside?
So comparing the freezing and expansion of the parallel plates of a neutron in deuterium with the freezing and expansion of one of the proton+muon that is acting as a makeshift neutron in H2.
If I can numbers correlate the H2 expansion with the Deuterium expansion would be a alternative proof that Water is really H4O and not H2O.
AP
to
So now on Blankenship's book "Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis", 2014, page 134, shows The structure of ATP, ADP, AMP. And within that structure are OH hydroxyls.
In New Chemistry, water is truly H4O, and where hydroxyls are now H2O. And we have first proof of this in the Figure 8.1 of Blankenship's "Chemical structure of ATP".
For in the lower left corner of the diagram, Blankenship has a H+ all alone, (really a mindless error) and has P surrounded by O-, O-, O and OH. The OH is really H2O for hydroxyls are H2O and water itself is H4O, and that would leave that
to realize that there is no HC, no H2C, no H3C, but starts with H4C, and that tells me water starts with H4O. Totally confident that Old Chemistry, Old Physics did electrolysis experiments and the moment they saw hydrogen test tube be 2x volume of oxygenThe world of physics and chemistry should drop what they are doing and weigh the electrolysis test tube of hydrogen and oxygen to discover the correct true formula of water is H4O.
AP is total confident, becuase an Atom cannot exist if it has no capacitor structure such as a neutron, or one of the H in H2 acting as a neutron. I am totally confident that Water formula is truly H4O. And I need look only to methane of H4C,
electrolysis of water.When water electrolysis is physics weighed, AP is confident that there are 4H per every one oxygen O. And that Water is truly H4O.
AP, King of Science
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
9:34 AM (15 minutes ago)
to
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 8:56:57 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
Now modern day physics and chemist experimenters can really do a marvelous job if they wanted to. For they could freeze the test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen to where they are liquid and compare liquids from water electrolysis.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
10:01 AM (5 hours ago)
to
So, what AP is saying here is that we do electrolysis of water. We collect the two test tubes, one with oxygen the other with hydrogen.
To prove Water is truly the formula H4O and not H2O we must weigh the masses of the two tubes to find that the ratio is 1 x 16amu to 4 x 1amu.
The silly grotesque science error of the past was to look at volumes in the two test tubes-- "Hey-- the hydrogen is twice the volume of oxygen so the formula of water is H2O".
No, way was that science good practice. For the correct formula of water needs to be measured by mass, by atomic mass units where Oxygen is 16amu and hydrogen is 1amu.
I suspect a balance beam scale is good enough to see the hydrogen test tube will be 1/4 as massive as the oxygen test tube. To get within precision of electronic weighing scale of 0.00001 gram we just have to make a larger test tube of
properties of solid methane is discussed near 20.48K and...AP is betting that the readings will be hydrogen test tube 1/4 the mass of oxygen test tube proving Water formula is truly H4O.
Old Physics and Old Chemistry is betting that the mass experiment will have the hydrogen test tube be 1/8 the mass of the oxygen test tube, proving Water formula is H2O.
AP does not have these precision equipment to conduct an at-home experiment of this nature.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
12:38 PM (4 hours ago)
to
So, once Water is found to actually be H4O, not H2O, we move on to methane, and ask the same question of its hydrogen bonds. Is Methane really that of H8C and not H4C.
Well, looking in the literature for anomalies to methane, I come across a arXiv "Low and high-temperature anomalies in the physical properties of solid methane "The anomalous behavior of thermodynamic, spectral, plastic, elastic and some other
AP wonders: if they can get methane to solid form, well, I am then hopeful that the mass of the molecule can be determined. Because if methane is truly H8C, that difference of H4 in atomic mass units would be very much noticeable difference.
Chemistry Europe--
"The Anomalous Deuterium Isotope Effect in the NMR Spectrum of Methane...
P Vermeeren, 2023
"The abnormally long and weak methylidyne C-H bond.."
"The C-H bond of the methylidyne radical, CH*, is abnormally long and weak, even longer and..."
AP asks, are these anomalies solved if we consider methane is actually H8C and not H4C?
AP
with date-time markers, and fact telling. And there are no problem sets. This book is intended for 1st year college. Until I include problem sets and exercises, I leave it to the professor and instructor to provide such. And also, chemistry is hugely aMy 250th published book.
TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY; H2 is the hydrogen Atom and water is H4O, not H2O// Chemistry
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
Prologue: This textbook is 1/2 research history and 1/2 factual textbook combined as one textbook. For many of the experiments described here-in have not yet been performed, such as water is really H4O not H2O. Written in a style of history research
textbook series. What got me started on this project is the fact that no chemistry textbook had the correct formula for water which is actually H4O and not H2O. Leaving the true formula for hydroxyl groups as H2O and not OH. But none of this is possiblePreface: This is my 250th book of science, and the first of my textbooks on Teaching True Chemistry. I have completed the Teaching True Physics and the Teaching True Mathematics textbook series. But had not yet started on a Teaching True Chemistry
molecule H4O plus the subatomic particle H, and the hydrogen atom H2. Showing how one H is a proton torus with muon inside (blue color) doing the Faraday law. Protons are toruses with many windings. Protons are the coils in Faraday law while muons areCover Picture: Sorry for the crude sketch work but chemistry and physics students are going to have to learn to make such sketches in a minute or less. Just as they make Lewis diagrams or ball & stick diagrams. My 4-5 minute sketch-work of the Water
Product details
• ASIN : B0CCLPTBDG
• Publication date : July 21, 2023
• Language : English
• File size : 788 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
• Print length : 168 pages
Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.y zMy 3rd published book
| /
| /
|/______ x
AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
#12-2, My 11th published book
World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science. Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof.
Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising thatmost math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a
To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove aFTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a
Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1309 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 154 pages
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
My 24th published book
World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3defined infinity borderline was addressed within the proof. And because infinity has a borderline means that in free space with no borderlines to tackle and contend with, the 12 kissing point density that is the hexagonal close packed is the maximum
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
There has been a alleged proof of KPP by Thomas Hales, but his is a fakery because he does not define what infinity actually means, for it means a borderline between finite and infinite numbers. Thus, KPP was never going to be proven until a well-
Cover picture: is a container and so the closed packing must be modified once the border is nearly reached to maximize the number of spheres.mistakes are corrected in Old Math. And when those mistakes are corrected, it is seen that calculus is just a tiny bit harder than learning the 4 operators of math-- add, subtract, multiply, divide. The last two operators of math are derivative and
Product details
• ASIN : B07NMV8NQQ
• Publication date : March 20, 2019
• Language : English
• File size : 1241 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 60 pages
• Lending : Enabled
My 245th published book of science.
Overhaul & Revitalization of Calculus// Math-psychology-sociology
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
Preface: The purpose of this book is to move the dial on calculus education to where all of mathematics is easy, simple, clear, and understandable to even High School students. Where calculus is taught in early High School. All of this is possible when
Cover Picture: My cover picture is my iphone photograph of my own handwriting of Decimal Grid Numbers, the numbers that replace the Reals of Old Math, plus the types of polynomials, sitting a-top a sheet of graphing paper. Those three dots after thenumbers and polynomials means they continue and I have room to show only three kinds. Calculus is after all, a science of geometry for derivative is rate of change of dy to dx, and integral is after-all the area under the function graph.
Product details
• ASIN : B0C9P5F755
• Publication date : June 27, 2023
• Language : English
• File size : 530 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
• Print length : 116 pages
Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O.AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.00001 gram
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.00001
Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not
Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.00001
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not
Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O
"No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 11:43:00 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O
Wider World: Yeah, I've seen many of these 'joke bits' *decades in the past*, guys. It's not 'all new to me'."No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 8:40:31 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 11:43:00 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is
No, it really isn't.Wider World: Yeah, I've seen many of these 'joke bits' *decades in the past*, guys. It's not 'all new to me'."No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 8:36:26 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.
On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 8:40:31 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 11:43:00 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is
...and they attribute 'magic powers' to their rhetorics that one oneself could really, really 'leave out of the equation'.No, it really isn't.Wider World: Yeah, I've seen many of these 'joke bits' *decades in the past*, guys. It's not 'all new to me'."No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 8:33:52 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand,
On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 8:36:26 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 8:40:31 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 11:43:00 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water
"There is only fooling, and fooling always works." Most of us don't think so....and they attribute 'magic powers' to their rhetorics that one oneself could really, really 'leave out of the equation'.No, it really isn't.Wider World: Yeah, I've seen many of these 'joke bits' *decades in the past*, guys. It's not 'all new to me'."No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:28:59 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 8:33:52 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 8:36:26 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 8:40:31 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 11:43:00 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving
(People who could not see another side to *On the Genealogy of Morality*, etc.)"There is only fooling, and fooling always works." Most of us don't think so....and they attribute 'magic powers' to their rhetorics that one oneself could really, really 'leave out of the equation'.No, it really isn't.Wider World: Yeah, I've seen many of these 'joke bits' *decades in the past*, guys. It's not 'all new to me'."No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:52:25 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:28:59 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 8:33:52 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 8:36:26 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 8:40:31 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 11:43:00 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving
Please don't 'sign my name' to stuff, etc.(People who could not see another side to *On the Genealogy of Morality*, etc.)"There is only fooling, and fooling always works." Most of us don't think so....and they attribute 'magic powers' to their rhetorics that one oneself could really, really 'leave out of the equation'.No, it really isn't.Wider World: Yeah, I've seen many of these 'joke bits' *decades in the past*, guys. It's not 'all new to me'."No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 3:30:03 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:52:25 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:28:59 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 8:33:52 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 8:36:26 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 8:40:31 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 11:43:00 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving
"Pretty please?"Please don't 'sign my name' to stuff, etc.(People who could not see another side to *On the Genealogy of Morality*, etc.)"There is only fooling, and fooling always works." Most of us don't think so....and they attribute 'magic powers' to their rhetorics that one oneself could really, really 'leave out of the equation'.No, it really isn't.Wider World: Yeah, I've seen many of these 'joke bits' *decades in the past*, guys. It's not 'all new to me'."No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
It's more or less legally required, thanks.
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 8:24:11 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 3:30:03 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:52:25 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:28:59 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 8:33:52 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 8:36:26 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 8:40:31 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 11:43:00 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water,
No, 'forgery is not a thing', really."Pretty please?"Please don't 'sign my name' to stuff, etc.(People who could not see another side to *On the Genealogy of Morality*, etc.)"There is only fooling, and fooling always works." Most of us don't think so....and they attribute 'magic powers' to their rhetorics that one oneself could really, really 'leave out of the equation'.No, it really isn't.Wider World: Yeah, I've seen many of these 'joke bits' *decades in the past*, guys. It's not 'all new to me'."No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
It's more or less legally required, thanks.
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 8:30:46 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 8:24:11 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 3:30:03 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:52:25 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:28:59 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 8:33:52 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 8:36:26 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 8:40:31 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 11:43:00 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water,
"What is it, then?"No, 'forgery is not a thing', really."Pretty please?"Please don't 'sign my name' to stuff, etc.(People who could not see another side to *On the Genealogy of Morality*, etc.)"There is only fooling, and fooling always works." Most of us don't think so....and they attribute 'magic powers' to their rhetorics that one oneself could really, really 'leave out of the equation'.No, it really isn't.Wider World: Yeah, I've seen many of these 'joke bits' *decades in the past*, guys. It's not 'all new to me'."No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
It's more or less legally required, thanks.
A 'runabout inference ticket' for you to continually be becoming more expansive in thought and action, unfortunately.
On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 3:09:58 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 8:30:46 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 8:24:11 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 3:30:03 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:52:25 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:28:59 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 8:33:52 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 8:36:26 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 8:40:31 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 11:43:00 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:14:23 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Can_Dr.Patrick D.Gallagher (physics),_J.Rhubarb,Dr.Herbert Boyer,Dr.Paul Lauterbur (chem),Dr.Joseph Boudreau--please--step into the University of Pittsburgh physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water,
"That's a pretty speculative theory of what that is.""What is it, then?"No, 'forgery is not a thing', really."Pretty please?"Please don't 'sign my name' to stuff, etc.(People who could not see another side to *On the Genealogy of Morality*, etc.)"There is only fooling, and fooling always works." Most of us don't think so....and they attribute 'magic powers' to their rhetorics that one oneself could really, really 'leave out of the equation'.No, it really isn't.Wider World: Yeah, I've seen many of these 'joke bits' *decades in the past*, guys. It's not 'all new to me'."No, it really is. You think your 'can't-miss' routines are a lot, lot more to the point than they are..."Wider World: "I see what you're doing here, but perhaps this has become just too repetitive? Even in this most recent 'posting marathon'?"Wider World: "Also, misspelling his name as 'Rhubarb' is really transparent, like, I'd do that too, but it's not that clever..."
It's more or less legally required, thanks.
A 'runabout inference ticket' for you to continually be becoming more expansive in thought and action, unfortunately.
Maybe really true. But about "speculation" in general...
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 06:18:24 |
| Calls: | 12,100 |
| Calls today: | 8 |
| Files: | 15,003 |
| Messages: | 6,517,919 |
| Posted today: | 1 |