• The toxic legacy of lockdown is destroying our political system Until p

    From Michael Ejercito@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 17 07:20:14 2024
    XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc

    https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1dhe1i0/uk_telegraph_the_toxic_legacy_of_lockdown_is/

    The toxic legacy of lockdown is destroying our political system
    Until politicians come clean about the devastating costs it inflicted,
    we will be stuck in this cycle of failure
    JANET DALEY
    15 June 2024 • 2:16pm
    Janet Daley

    A sign which says "stay at home to save lives" on the A470
    CREDIT: Matthew Horwood
    I have never known a general election like this one. I cannot remember a national campaign in my lifetime in which the only question for voters
    was who they hated less.
    There have certainly been moments in the past when a sitting government
    was so loathed that its defeat was clearly inevitable, but on those
    occasions there was at least some hope and optimism attaching to the
    rivals who would displace them.
    Now, from both the evidence of opinion polling, which shows almost no enthusiasm for Sir Keir Starmer as prime minister in what is regarded as
    a presidential contest, and the anecdotal, word-of-mouth currency that
    is often more accurate, the conclusion is unavoidable.
    Apart from vested interests in the public sector and the trade unions
    (some of which appear to be making their support conditional on promises
    of greater power), the electorate does not appear to much like the
    Labour Party or its leader – but will still vote for them.
    They are unaffected by the fact that the party’s policy statements are evasive and its aims platitudinous, because they are not interested in
    them at all. Labour’s sole function is to act as a blunt instrument with which to beat the Tories. This applies equally to Reform, which might as
    well change its name to Revenge.
    This fulminating rage must be acknowledged and will have to play itself
    out through the electoral process, but before we enter that dark place
    in which we are governed by people nobody wanted, it is important to
    examine this phenomenon, because it is the most serious threat to
    healthy democracy in the postwar era. What is happening in Britain is
    not unique.
    Virtually all of the Western governments who presided over the pandemic
    years are being thrown out, sometimes with deeply disturbing
    consequences that could never have been anticipated a mere decade ago.
    Politics in the most advanced countries of what was known as the Free
    World has become deranged. Populations once believed to have renounced
    febrile demagoguery and nativist hatred, having absorbed the terrible
    lessons of the 20th century, are once again infected by them.
    What is going on here? In this country, the conditions of ordinary life
    for most people – even those groups who consider themselves unfairly disadvantaged – are surely not as bad as they were in, say, the 1970s,
    when the lights were going out on a regular rota, public transport was frequently shut down completely by national strikes, and my generation
    had to cope with devastating interest-rate rises and soaring inflation.
    Of course there is genuine hardship and frustration – particularly over
    the possibility of home ownership, which is the key to independent
    adulthood – but this overwhelming fury is surely disproportionate to the conditions of everyday life.
    The crucial complaint is that “nothing works”, which applies almost entirely to the public sector, and that no one in government seems to be
    able to fix this. The assumption is that the governing party is either
    utterly incompetent or indifferent to the needs of ordinary people.
    This exasperation is exacerbated by the fact that neither the
    Conservatives, who have been in power, nor Labour, which has been in
    official opposition, can utter the truth. Government policies devised to
    deal with the pandemic and the energy crisis created by the war in
    Ukraine have tanked the economy.
    Locking people up in their homes and paying them not to work destroyed
    the possibility of creating new wealth and saw governments print
    mountains of money that debased the currency. Energy bills were
    subsidised by even more money from the Treasury.
    But the governing party was not alone in its responsibility for creating
    this disaster. Labour was not only complicit in these plans, it was
    positively exuberant about them. Indeed, Sir Keir wanted earlier
    lockdown, more lockdown and longer lockdown.
    There was no respectable, mainstream political voice arguing that the
    economic and social damage done by this decision to shut down the
    country – and thus disable all the mechanisms of productive,
    wealth-creating activity – might be catastrophic.
    And there is still no one from the governing class prepared to say that repairing this damage is going to require the kind of sacrifices to
    which modern electorates are not accustomed.
    More money cannot be poured into public services without raising taxes.
    And raising taxes is a sure-fire way of killing any prospect of creating
    new wealth, which makes a nonsense of Labour’s commitment to increase
    growth.
    Somebody is going to have to come clean about this if the democratic
    process is to regain credibility. The Government, egged on by the
    Opposition, was running on empty, spending funds that didn’t exist, for
    the best part of two years, and the day of reckoning has finally arrived.
    Now, as it happens this truth that dare not speak its name coincides
    with a new era in public speech. Social media has opened channels for
    the dissemination of what can be completely irresponsible, often false
    and pathologically vicious content.
    Troll armies, sometimes robotically generated, roam unchecked across a landscape whose boundaries are largely unmonitored. Unverifiable and untraceable sources fling out wholesale bile or blatant deception on a
    scale that is truly overwhelming.
    The Centre for Policy Studies issued a report last week suggesting that
    this could be the first “deepfake election”, in which simulated video
    clips of politicians making damaging statements are being circulated online. Whipping up hatred and distrust is the whole point of this nasty new
    game and there is only one way to stop its progress: some politician or
    other is going to have to tell the truth.
    We need a Churchillian voice to deliver the blood, sweat and tears
    message, which would at least show respect for the intelligence of the populace: there are no easy solutions to our current problems.
    We are going to ask you to make sacrifices and accept some
    disappointments. Remember that we have always survived as a nation by
    facing difficult times with courage and resourcefulness.
    But maybe it is too late for that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Ejercito@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 17 19:21:44 2024
    XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc

    Disgusted of Tunbridge Wellsabout 11 hours ago
    ReplyPermalinkOn Mon, 17 Jun 2024 07:20:14 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1dhe1i0/uk_telegraph_the_toxic_legacy_of_lockdown_is/
    The toxic legacy of lockdown is destroying our political system
    Your country, the Flippines, doesn't HAVE a political system, gook!

    <b'ris>
    Mangina, my country is the United States of America.

    You are a Nazi.

    As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.

    You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know you
    can not measure up.

    You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
    betters.

    You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
    tell it.

    You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
    out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of National Socialism.

    Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
    Freedom of choice terrifies you… which is why you choose minor children
    as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent adults in a consensually sexual way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a
    helpless victim, be it a prepubescent boy, or a patient in a mental
    hospital.

    That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or honest
    about it.


    Michael

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HeartDoc Andrew@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 17 22:54:47 2024
    XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc

    <toxic> 06/17/24 Again praying w/ Michael here ...

    https://narkive.com/x1C1SmH5.7

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Ejercito@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 19 08:17:50 2024
    XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc

    Disgusted of Tunbridge Wellsa day ago
    On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:21:44 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
    Mangina, my country is the United States of America.
    Gook, you are delusional. Your country is the Asiatic shithole known
    as the Flippines.
    Nithing, you yet again deny that I am an American.

    You are a Nazi.
    You are a gook.
    That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.

    Are you still hurting from how Kickboxer kickboxed you all around
    these newsgroups?

    As a Nazi, you are, above all else,
    As a craven gook who zsuckles jew ani, you are, below all else
    You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
    key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
    rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.

    Bill explains what nithings are.

    http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446

    Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings

    by Bill Levinson
    It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
    knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
    person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
    psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
    that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
    argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence against civilians as “resistance.”

    We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
    humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
    worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
    English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
    describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
    word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
    nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity. Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
    term of utmost opprobrium.”

    We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
    supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
    Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
    come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
    dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
    beings.
    nithings

    Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
    become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
    recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,

    The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
    earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
    obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
    known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
    was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
    retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
    back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
    cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.

    A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
    enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
    supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
    degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
    tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
    is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
    carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
    and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
    nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
    Humanity.

    The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
    outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
    for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
    German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
    kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
    but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
    kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”

    The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
    complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
    transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
    sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
    Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
    “The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
    and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
    to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”

    "Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’ destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and “unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
    perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
    to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
    in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
    enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
    total antithesis of God the Creator.

    The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
    alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
    directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
    matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
    make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
    that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
    than any man can build.

    This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
    comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
    is possible.

    In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
    subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
    its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
    toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
    extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
    apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
    others to do likewise.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Ejercito@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 19 10:00:12 2024
    XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
    XPost: soc.culture.israel

    Disgusted of Tunbridge Wellsabout an hour ago
    Wed, 19 Jun 2024 08:17:50 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
    That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
    How the fuck CAN it be, gook? I'm WHITE and you're a shitskinned
    mongoloid!
    Skin color is a superficial characteristic.

    Are you still hurting from how Kickboxer kickboxed you all around
    these newsgroups?
    Are YOU still hurting from how I kicked your grik lover Grikboxer®™
    off Usenet all those years ago? He never showed his grubby unshaven
    semitic face here again!
    Kickboxer did a number on you.

    He also did a number of Losswe Cannon, JeSSe, Heinrich, Carolina
    Reb, and Boedicia.

    Now here is Keren Nguyen, nee Swanson, celebrating sixteen years
    with her husband.

    https://www.instagram.com/p/C8PkE9apG9m/?img_index=1

    You can see the love! (and much more happened behind closed doors.)

    The following article explains your pathology.




    http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/03/11/historys_oldest_hatred/


    History's oldest hatred
    By Jeff Jacoby
    Globe Columnist / March 11, 2009
    Email|Print|Single Page||Text size – +

    ANTI-SEMITISM is an ancient derangement, the oldest of hatreds, so
    it is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer "anti-Semitism" - a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
    Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or
    Jew-hatred - is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never
    had anything to do with Semites or being Semitic.

    Perhaps there is no good name for a virus as mutable as anti-Semitism.
    "The Jews have been objects of hatred in pagan, religious, and secular societies," write Joseph Telushkin and Dennis Prager in "Why the Jews?,"
    their classic study of anti-Semitism. "Fascists have accused them of
    being Communists, and Communists have branded them capitalists. Jews who
    live in non-Jewish societies have been accused of having dual loyalties,
    while Jews who live in the Jewish state have been condemned as
    'racists.' Poor Jews are bullied, and rich Jews are resented. Jews have
    been branded as both rootless cosmopolitans and ethnic chauvinists. Jews
    who assimilate have been called a 'fifth column,' while those who stay
    together spark hatred for remaining separate."

    There was Jew-hatred before there was Christianity or Islam, before
    Nazism or Communism, before Zionism or the Middle East conflict. This
    week Jews celebrate the festival of Purim, gathering in synagogues to
    read the biblical book of Esther. Set in ancient Persia, it tells of
    Haman, a powerful royal adviser who is insulted when the Jewish sage
    Mordechai refuses to bow down to him. Haman resolves to wipe out the
    empire's Jews and makes the case for genocide in an appeal to the king:

    "There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among . . . all the provinces of your kingdom, and their laws are different from those of
    other peoples, and the king's laws they do not keep, so it is of no
    benefit for the king to tolerate them. If it please the king, let it be
    written that they be destroyed."

    When the king agrees, Haman makes plans "to annihilate, to kill and
    destroy all the Jews, the young and the elderly, children and women, in
    one day . . . and to take their property for plunder."

    What drives such bloodlust? Haman's indictment accuses the Jews of
    lacking national loyalty, of insinuating themselves throughout the
    empire, of flouting the king's law. But the Jews of Persia had done
    nothing to justify Haman's murderous anti-Semitism - just as Jews in
    later ages did nothing that justified their persecution under the Church
    or Islam, or their repression at the hands of Russian czars and Soviet commissars, or their slaughter by Nazi Germany. When the president of
    Iran today calls for the extirpation of the Jewish state, when firebombs
    are hurled at synagogues in London and Paris and Chicago, it is not
    because Jews deserve to be victimized.

    Many Jews are no saints, but the paranoid frenzy that is anti-Semitism
    is not explained by what Jews do, but by what they are. They are the
    object of anti-Semitism, not its cause. That is why the haters'
    rationales can be so wildly inconsistent and their agendas so
    contradictory. What do those who vilify Jews as greedy bankers have in
    common with those who revile them as fiendish Bolsheviks? Nothing, save
    an irrational obsession with Jews.

    At one point, Haman lets the mask slip. He boasts to his friends and
    family of "the glory of his riches, and the great number of his sons,
    and everything in which the king had promoted him and elevated him."
    Still, he seethes with rage and frustration: "Yet all this is worthless
    to me so long as I see Mordechai the Jew sitting at the king's gate."
    That is the unforgivable offense: "Mordechai the Jew" refuses to blend
    in, to be just like everyone else. He goes on sitting there -
    undigested, unassimilated, and therefore unbearable.

    Of course Haman had his ostensible reasons for targeting Jews. So did Hitler and Arafat, so does Ahmadinejad. Sometimes the anti-Semite
    focuses on the Jew's religion, sometimes on his laws and lifestyle,
    sometimes on his professional achievements. Under it all, however, it is
    the Jew's Jewishness that the anti-Semite cannot abide.

    With all their flaws and failings, the Jewish people endure, their role
    in history not yet finished. So the world's oldest hatred endures too,
    as obsessive and indestructible - and deadly - as ever.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HeartDoc Andrew@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 19 17:34:47 2024
    XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
    XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife

    <toxic> 06/19/24 Again praying w/ Michael here ...

    https://narkive.com/fUufvYED.11

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Ejercito@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 23 08:43:40 2024
    XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
    XPost: soc.culture.israel

    Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells4 days ago
    ReplyPermalinkOn Wed, 19 Jun 2024 10:00:12 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
    ...

    Now here is Keren Nguyen, nee Swanson, celebrating sixteen years
    with her husband.
    https://www.instagram.com/p/C8PkE9apG9m/?img_index=1
    Nguyen? Sounds like she's 'married' to a gook in an illegal bestial reliationship.
    There is nothing illegal nor bestial about their marriage.

    Here is a picture of her with him during their high school days.

    https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_C36KR-7zB0/frame0.jpg

    A vlog of Keren when she was pregnant for the first time.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ic1r4sQs7qg

    And their YouTube channel.

    https://www.youtube.com/@kkandbabyj/videos

    She and her husband are such a shining example of heterosexuality
    for all normal humanity!


    Michael

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HeartDoc Andrew@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 23 14:13:02 2024
    XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
    XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife

    <toxic> 06/23/24 Again praying w/ Michael here ...

    https://narkive.com/fUufvYED.11

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Ejercito@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 23 18:10:14 2024
    XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
    XPost: soc.culture.israel

    Disgusted of Tunbridge Wellsabout 6 hours ago
    On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 08:43:40 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
    There is nothing illegal nor bestial about their marriage.
    Their bestial 'marriage' is like totally illegal, gook.
    Wrong!

    Here is a picture of her with him during their high school days.
    https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_C36KR-7zB0/frame0.jpg
    Underage bestiality - that's even WORSE!
    It is heterosexuality, and it is awesome they got started young!

    A vlog of Keren when she was pregnant for the first time.
    http://youtu.be/ic1r4sQs7qg
    I hope she had the sub-baby euthanised upon excretion.
    You hoped wrong.

    She gave birth to a boy named Jackson.

    And she and her husband have four more children.
    And their YouTube channel.
    Hideous.
    There is nothing hideous about love, heterosexuality, and matrimony!

    She and her husband are such a shining example of heterosexuality
    for all normal humanity!
    She and her gook 'mate' are such a shining example of bestiality for
    all subnormal subhumanity such as YOU!
    There is no bestiality!


    Michael

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HeartDoc Andrew@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 23 23:02:14 2024
    XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
    XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife

    <toxic> 06/23/24 AgainX2 praying w/ Michael here ...

    https://narkive.com/fUufvYED.11

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Ejercito@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 29 08:43:23 2024
    XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
    XPost: soc.culture.israel

    Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells4 days ago
    On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 18:10:14 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito

    You hoped wrong.
    She should have done and spared the world another hideous hybrid.
    Hideous?

    Here is a YouTube playlist of Jackson.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkeSSdElG0g&list=PLvhqjNEyQjYpu5FkezzkInohIJ-bz8TSA


    You can comment on the videos.


    She gave birth to a boy named Jackson.
    She excreted a hideous subhuman sub-baby.
    There is nothing hideous or subhuman about her son.

    Here is the family now, with five children.

    https://www.instagram.com/p/C7-ZR8ZMGtI/?img_index=1



    Michael

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)