1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.MATH

  • Re: Rate of Change

    From Willilam Babuh@21:1/5 to Street on Sun Jul 27 11:39:22 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Street wrote:

    Time is not inherently linear. It is not merely a fourth axis in a fixed spacetime model. Rather, it emerges as both a perceptual and physical construct tied to the rate of change within systems. When this rate of
    change deviates significantly—especially in contexts involving mass and velocity—it can affect how time passes relative to an observer,
    producing measurable physical effects. In some cases, this may even lead
    to gravitational anomalies.

    you are using words saying nothing, idiot. A change involves time, which
    is linear. A not linear time is not time, hence useless to anything, you uneducated idiot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Moshe Stavropoulos@21:1/5 to Paul.B.Andersen on Thu Jul 31 16:08:30 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

    In _physics_ "time" must be measurable to have any meaning.
    The instrument which measures "time" is a "clock" by definition.
    So "time" is what we measure by clocks by definition.

    There is no alternative to this definition.

    amazing such new beginner crap out of you; time is not clocks, time flows
    with no clocks whatsoever; in this aspect clocks can be anything
    transiting form a state to another state, along the macro domain.

    then time is not "measurable", but rather *_registered_*; one use time to measure *_something_else_*. All measurements has a *_timestamp_*
    associated with. If changes are measured, the least of two timestamps are
    to be registered.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Edmund Balanovski@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Sun Aug 3 09:54:57 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    You can measure all those quantities, but that is not a requirement.

    Many things in nature are not measurable for one reason or the other,
    but do still exist.

    Physics deals also with distant stars, for instance, which are too far
    away to measure them.

    once materialized (high amplitude probability distribution) and made
    visible, that thing is already measured. You are just another kind of jew,
    in Barlin. Jew rob jew, alot of wars between the jews. All wars are jew.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)