And note that none of that is about inertial frames and motion only:
time proper ticks at the same rate every time every place. Indeed, time dilation and length contraction are only relativistic effects, we know
that, don't we? "Nothing is actually slowing or shortening aboard that
ship", which remains canonical relativity.
On 5/25/2025 1:08 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 24.05.2025 17:21, skrev Julio Di Egidio:
which, apparently. That said, thanks for asking:
The "clock hypothesis", in simple terms, is the principle that all
working clocks tick at the same rate (the proper time rate) in their
own frame.
Anyone can check GPs, in the real world the rate of Cs clocks is either
9 192 631 770 or 9 192 631 774. Not even talking about pendulum clocks.
Good bye, "clock hypothesis",
good bye The Shit of Einstein.
Maciej Woźniak wrote:
On 5/25/2025 1:08 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 24.05.2025 17:21, skrev Julio Di Egidio:
which, apparently. That said, thanks for asking:
The "clock hypothesis", in simple terms, is the principle that all
working clocks tick at the same rate (the proper time rate) in their
own frame.
Anyone can check GPs, in the real world the rate of Cs clocks is either
9 192 631 770 or 9 192 631 774. Not even talking about pendulum clocks.
Good bye, "clock hypothesis",
good bye The Shit of Einstein.
my friend, pendulum clocks are NOT clocks, but altitude_meters.
Den 24.05.2025 17:21, skrev Julio Di Egidio:
which, apparently. That said, thanks for asking:Well said! https://paulba.no/pdf/Clock_rate.pdf See 1.1.
And note that none of that is about inertial frames and motion only:
time proper ticks at the same rate every time every place. Indeed,
time dilation and length contraction are only relativistic effects, we
know that, don't we? "Nothing is actually slowing or shortening aboard
that ship", which remains canonical relativity.-Julio
On 5/25/2025 4:34 PM, Delman Vamvakidis wrote:
Maciej Woźniak wrote:
On 5/25/2025 1:08 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 24.05.2025 17:21, skrev Julio Di Egidio:
which, apparently. That said, thanks for asking:
The "clock hypothesis", in simple terms, is the principle that all
working clocks tick at the same rate (the proper time rate) in their >>>>> own frame.
Anyone can check GPs, in the real world the rate of Cs clocks is
either 9 192 631 770 or 9 192 631 774. Not even talking about pendulum
clocks.
Good bye, "clock hypothesis",
good bye The Shit of Einstein.
my friend, pendulum clocks are NOT clocks, but altitude_meters.
I'm not your friend and pendulum clocks are clocks.
An immediate consequence of the fact that light signals actually travel
at infinite speed is that every individual particle in this Universe
must be entangled not just with some of its neighbours (in fact, across
space and time as it turns out), but with most (transitively) of the
other instances of the same particle along its own world line, i.e. as
soon as there are any mirrors around...
Where "self-entanglement along the world-line" seems to me a good
starting point for coherence conditions for retro-causation, aka a
solution to the Twin Paradox.
Den 30.05.2025 01:47, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
Paul, that one clock runs a different rate under certain conditions
does not warrant the inference that time itself runs at a different
rate
Please define "time itself". How can you measure that the rate of
Richard Hachel <[email protected]> wrote:
When someone has pain in a joint, such as the shoulder, you don't[-]
inject the knee. You inject, in loco dolenti.
How does an aspirin know where the pain is?
Le 01/06/2025 à 14:41, Julio Di Egidio a écrit :
Consider the (Minkowski) space-time structure -Julio
I laughed.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 154:48:06 |
| Calls: | 12,092 |
| Files: | 15,000 |
| Messages: | 6,517,690 |