• "The Day The Earth Stood Still"

    From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 18 17:23:32 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Albert Einstein was the director, the producer and the screenwriter of the movie entitled "The Day The Earth Stood Still" 1951.

    Of course Albert Einstein used a ghostwriter (which in those day that is what the 'communists' writers did)


    Here is a link to the movie script:

    https://www.dailyscript.com/scripts/the_day_the_earth_stood_still.html


    Here is the full free movie:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xh8P4MIaZBA

    https://archive.org/details/The.Day.The.Earth.Stood.Still1951


    First , where did the Albert Einstein get the idea of the title of the movie "The Day The Earth Stood Still" ????


    Since Albert Einstein is the designer and architect of 'The Atomic Bomb', and launched The Manhattan Project,

    Albert Einstein got the idea from an incident mentioned in the newspapers at his time:

    "In support of this there are stories of the experiences of automobile drivers in the vicinity of Los Alamos.
    According to these their radios and motors stopped suddenly at the same instant and after 15 or 20 minutes suddenly began to operate as usual."

    https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2013/09/20/worst-manhattan-project-leaks/ https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/1944-Cleveland-Press-Forbidden-City.pdf


    KLAATU
    (after a moment,
    quietly)
    You see -- the electricity's been
    neutralized -- all over the world.

    The impact of this calm, quiet statement is shattering. Helen
    stares at him awe-struck. Then she speaks numbly, almost
    inaudibly.

    HELEN
    Bobby was telling the truth -- wasn't
    he?

    Klaatu stares at her evenly, as we--

    DISSOLVE TO:

    MED. SHOT - STREET

    All vehicular traffic in the street is at a dead stop.
    Automobiles, busses, trolley cars -- all are stalled. Drivers
    and passengers are climbing out of the vehicles in utter
    bewilderment. Except for the people, it is as though the
    street had been frozen in motion.





    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sun May 18 21:27:15 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Albert Einstein was the director, the producer and the screenwriter of the movie entitled "The Day The Earth Stood Still" 1951.

    Of course Albert Einstein used a ghostwriter (which in those day that is what the 'communists' writers did)

    Here is a link to the movie script:

    https://www.dailyscript.com/scripts/the_day_the_earth_stood_still.html

    Here is the full free movie:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xh8P4MIaZBA

    https://archive.org/details/The.Day.The.Earth.Stood.Still1951

    First , where did the Albert Einstein get the idea of the title of the movie "The Day The Earth Stood Still" ????

    Since Albert Einstein is the designer and architect of 'The Atomic Bomb', and launched The Manhattan Project,

    Albert Einstein got the idea from an incident mentioned in the newspapers at his time:

    "In support of this there are stories of the experiences of automobile drivers in the vicinity of Los Alamos.
    According to these their radios and motors stopped suddenly at the same instant and after 15 or 20 minutes suddenly began to operate as usual."

    https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2013/09/20/worst-manhattan-project-leaks/ https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/1944-Cleveland-Press-Forbidden-City.pdf

    KLAATU
    (after a moment,
    quietly)
    You see -- the electricity's been
    neutralized -- all over the world.

    The impact of this calm, quiet statement is shattering. Helen
    stares at him awe-struck. Then she speaks numbly, almost
    inaudibly.

    HELEN
    Bobby was telling the truth -- wasn't
    he?

    Klaatu stares at her evenly, as we--

    DISSOLVE TO:

    MED. SHOT - STREET

    All vehicular traffic in the street is at a dead stop.
    Automobiles, busses, trolley cars -- all are stalled. Drivers
    and passengers are climbing out of the vehicles in utter
    bewilderment. Except for the people, it is as though the
    street had been frozen in motion.



    Albert Einstein speaks through two characters, KLAATU and Proffesor
    Bernhart





    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Mon May 19 08:58:38 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Albert Einstein was the director, the producer and the screenwriter of the movie entitled "The Day The Earth Stood Still" 1951.

    Of course Albert Einstein used a ghostwriter (which in those day that is what the 'communists' writers did)

    Here is a link to the movie script:

    https://www.dailyscript.com/scripts/the_day_the_earth_stood_still.html

    Here is the full free movie:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xh8P4MIaZBA

    https://archive.org/details/The.Day.The.Earth.Stood.Still1951

    First , where did the Albert Einstein get the idea of the title of the movie "The Day The Earth Stood Still" ????

    Since Albert Einstein is the designer and architect of 'The Atomic Bomb', and launched The Manhattan Project,

    Albert Einstein got the idea from an incident mentioned in the newspapers at his time:

    "In support of this there are stories of the experiences of automobile drivers in the vicinity of Los Alamos.
    According to these their radios and motors stopped suddenly at the same instant and after 15 or 20 minutes suddenly began to operate as usual."

    https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2013/09/20/worst-manhattan-project-leaks/ https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/1944-Cleveland-Press-Forbidden-City.pdf

    KLAATU
    (after a moment,
    quietly)
    You see -- the electricity's been
    neutralized -- all over the world.

    The impact of this calm, quiet statement is shattering. Helen
    stares at him awe-struck. Then she speaks numbly, almost
    inaudibly.

    HELEN
    Bobby was telling the truth -- wasn't
    he?

    Klaatu stares at her evenly, as we--

    DISSOLVE TO:

    MED. SHOT - STREET

    All vehicular traffic in the street is at a dead stop.
    Automobiles, busses, trolley cars -- all are stalled. Drivers
    and passengers are climbing out of the vehicles in utter
    bewilderment. Except for the people, it is as though the
    street had been frozen in motion.


    Albert Einstein speaks through two characters, KLAATU and Proffesor
    Bernhart


    Second, what about "Klaatu barada nikto"? Where did that come from??

    Everyone in the media already asked the 'listed' scriptwriter the question...and he has no answer for them!

    Of course he has no answer...he didn't come up with it. You would have to ask Albert Einstein. He came up with it!




    Professor Jacob Barnhardt, world-famous scientist
    and Nobel Prize winner


    Here are the links to Albert Einstein:

    Professor

    Jacob Barnhardt (Jacob is a Hebrew name)

    Barnhardt ( Barnhardt is a German name)

    Albert Einstein is Jewish and from Germany.

    world-famous scientist (in the 50's that would be Einstein)

    and Nobel Prize winner (Albert Einstein was a Nobel Prize winner)


    and this is just the beginninng of the list! (besides that it's based on Albert Einstein,
    the real Professor Bernhart, with that crazy hairdo)

    "Klaatu barada nikto"????

    Easy, it comes from Albert Einstein language...German!!!!


    KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language.





    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Mon May 19 22:46:16 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Albert Einstein was the director, the producer and the screenwriter of the movie entitled "The Day The Earth Stood Still" 1951.

    Of course Albert Einstein used a ghostwriter (which in those day that is what the 'communists' writers did)

    Here is a link to the movie script:

    https://www.dailyscript.com/scripts/the_day_the_earth_stood_still.html

    Here is the full free movie:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xh8P4MIaZBA

    https://archive.org/details/The.Day.The.Earth.Stood.Still1951

    First , where did the Albert Einstein get the idea of the title of the movie "The Day The Earth Stood Still" ????

    Since Albert Einstein is the designer and architect of 'The Atomic Bomb', and launched The Manhattan Project,

    Albert Einstein got the idea from an incident mentioned in the newspapers at his time:

    "In support of this there are stories of the experiences of automobile drivers in the vicinity of Los Alamos.
    According to these their radios and motors stopped suddenly at the same instant and after 15 or 20 minutes suddenly began to operate as usual."

    https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2013/09/20/worst-manhattan-project-leaks/ https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/1944-Cleveland-Press-Forbidden-City.pdf

    KLAATU
    (after a moment,
    quietly)
    You see -- the electricity's been
    neutralized -- all over the world.

    The impact of this calm, quiet statement is shattering. Helen
    stares at him awe-struck. Then she speaks numbly, almost
    inaudibly.

    HELEN
    Bobby was telling the truth -- wasn't
    he?

    Klaatu stares at her evenly, as we--

    DISSOLVE TO:

    MED. SHOT - STREET

    All vehicular traffic in the street is at a dead stop.
    Automobiles, busses, trolley cars -- all are stalled. Drivers
    and passengers are climbing out of the vehicles in utter
    bewilderment. Except for the people, it is as though the
    street had been frozen in motion.


    Albert Einstein speaks through two characters, KLAATU and Proffesor Bernhart

    Second, what about "Klaatu barada nikto"? Where did that come from??

    Everyone in the media already asked the 'listed' scriptwriter the question...and he has no answer for them!

    Of course he has no answer...he didn't come up with it. You would have to ask Albert Einstein. He came up with it!

    Professor Jacob Barnhardt, world-famous scientist
    and Nobel Prize winner

    Here are the links to Albert Einstein:

    Professor

    Jacob Barnhardt (Jacob is a Hebrew name)

    Barnhardt ( Barnhardt is a German name)

    Albert Einstein is Jewish and from Germany.

    world-famous scientist (in the 50's that would be Einstein)

    and Nobel Prize winner (Albert Einstein was a Nobel Prize winner)

    and this is just the beginninng of the list! (besides that it's based on Albert Einstein,
    the real Professor Bernhart, with that crazy hairdo)

    "Klaatu barada nikto"????

    Easy, it comes from Albert Einstein language...German!!!!

    KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language.


    Now, just reading or hearing KLAATU's dialogue you can tell it's Albert Einstein's voice that sending 'his message' through KLATU...


    there is one scene where KLAATU tells the boy Bobby.."Remind me tomorrow
    and I'll tell you about trains that run without tracks."
    (in the movie, not in the script)

    Did you know it was Albert Einstein that invented trains that don't need
    tracks to run?

    (reverse electromagnetism something like that)


    I heard the chinks gots trains that don't need tracks...

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 20 08:21:22 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Montag000019, 19.05.2025 um 17:58 schrieb The Starmaker:
    "Klaatu barada nikto"????

    Easy, it comes from Albert Einstein language...German!!!!


    KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language.


    This is not German!

    I have read, that this sentence means:

    God will not destroy the Earth (possibly: this time?).

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Harlie Kabanov@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Tue May 20 12:09:30 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    I have read, that this sentence means:

    God will not destroy the Earth (possibly: this time?).

    indeed; in relativity the US corporate media = CIA mouthpieces. Thus, you
    may not discover the freaking relativity is wrong. Turn off your
    television. You needed to do that for at least 40 years ago. Before the
    illegal introduction of the raping capitalism in communist countries.

    you want your fake printed money, now you eat the euro and the dollar fake printed money. Eat that. Just eat that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Tue May 20 16:57:02 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Albert Einstein was the director, the producer and the screenwriter of the movie entitled "The Day The Earth Stood Still" 1951.

    Of course Albert Einstein used a ghostwriter (which in those day that is what the 'communists' writers did)

    Here is a link to the movie script:

    https://www.dailyscript.com/scripts/the_day_the_earth_stood_still.html

    Here is the full free movie:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xh8P4MIaZBA

    https://archive.org/details/The.Day.The.Earth.Stood.Still1951

    First , where did the Albert Einstein get the idea of the title of the movie "The Day The Earth Stood Still" ????

    Since Albert Einstein is the designer and architect of 'The Atomic Bomb', and launched The Manhattan Project,

    Albert Einstein got the idea from an incident mentioned in the newspapers at his time:

    "In support of this there are stories of the experiences of automobile drivers in the vicinity of Los Alamos.
    According to these their radios and motors stopped suddenly at the same instant and after 15 or 20 minutes suddenly began to operate as usual."

    https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2013/09/20/worst-manhattan-project-leaks/
    https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/1944-Cleveland-Press-Forbidden-City.pdf

    KLAATU
    (after a moment,
    quietly)
    You see -- the electricity's been
    neutralized -- all over the world.

    The impact of this calm, quiet statement is shattering. Helen
    stares at him awe-struck. Then she speaks numbly, almost
    inaudibly.

    HELEN
    Bobby was telling the truth -- wasn't
    he?

    Klaatu stares at her evenly, as we--

    DISSOLVE TO:

    MED. SHOT - STREET

    All vehicular traffic in the street is at a dead stop.
    Automobiles, busses, trolley cars -- all are stalled. Drivers
    and passengers are climbing out of the vehicles in utter
    bewilderment. Except for the people, it is as though the
    street had been frozen in motion.


    Albert Einstein speaks through two characters, KLAATU and Proffesor Bernhart

    Second, what about "Klaatu barada nikto"? Where did that come from??

    Everyone in the media already asked the 'listed' scriptwriter the question...and he has no answer for them!

    Of course he has no answer...he didn't come up with it. You would have to ask Albert Einstein. He came up with it!

    Professor Jacob Barnhardt, world-famous scientist
    and Nobel Prize winner

    Here are the links to Albert Einstein:

    Professor

    Jacob Barnhardt (Jacob is a Hebrew name)

    Barnhardt ( Barnhardt is a German name)

    Albert Einstein is Jewish and from Germany.

    world-famous scientist (in the 50's that would be Einstein)

    and Nobel Prize winner (Albert Einstein was a Nobel Prize winner)

    and this is just the beginninng of the list! (besides that it's based on Albert Einstein,
    the real Professor Bernhart, with that crazy hairdo)

    "Klaatu barada nikto"????

    Easy, it comes from Albert Einstein language...German!!!!

    KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language.

    Now, just reading or hearing KLAATU's dialogue you can tell it's Albert Einstein's voice that sending 'his message' through KLATU...

    there is one scene where KLAATU tells the boy Bobby.."Remind me tomorrow
    and I'll tell you about trains that run without tracks."
    (in the movie, not in the script)

    Did you know it was Albert Einstein that invented trains that don't need tracks to run?

    (reverse electromagnetism something like that)

    I heard the chinks gots trains that don't need tracks...


    Now since KLAATU (Einstein's character) mentioned in 1951
    trains that run without tracks" , it's up to you to figure who came out
    with that idea first.

    MAGLEV

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Tue May 20 17:07:42 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Montag000019, 19.05.2025 um 17:58 schrieb The Starmaker:
    "Klaatu barada nikto"????

    Easy, it comes from Albert Einstein language...German!!!!


    KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language.

    This is not German!

    I have read, that this sentence means:

    God will not destroy the Earth (possibly: this time?).

    TH


    You are not thinking like an einstein...Klaatu in German
    is speled Klass or Klaus meaning as the charater is portrayed..."victory of the people".


    Your comment "God will not destroy the Earth (possibly: this time?)." refers to the robot...GORT,
    and GORT is meaning is GOD. and it is complete opposite! "He could destroy the Earth."

    HELEN
    Gort?
    (puzzled)
    But he's a robot. I mean -- without
    you, what could he do?

    KLAATU
    (slowly)
    There's no limit to what he could
    do. He could destroy the Earth.
    (with great urgency)
    If anything should happen to me, you
    must go to Gort. You must give him
    this message: "Klaatu barada nikto."
    Please repeat that.





    I gave you the script, I gave you the movie...can yous not THINK foryourselvesalready!!!!!






    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 20 22:27:50 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    "On March 1, 1954, the United States carried out a disastrous hydrogen bomb test, code-named "Castle Bravo," on
    Bikini Atoll in the Marshall Islands. Intended to be an explosion with a yield of six megatons, it turned out, due
    to an error in calculation by the scientists involved, to be the largest nuclear explosion ever conducted by the United States,
    amounting to fifteen megatons-one thou-sand times the explosive power of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima."


    Trust the Math
    Trust the Science and
    they will blow up the Earth!

    fuck it, right?

    i mean, who gives a fuck, right?

    i mean, fuck the people, right? who
    needs fucking people anyway?


    You want peace with Russia? BOMB THE FUCK OUT OF THEM!


    dats Peace.


    All we are saying is give peace a chance
    All we are saying is give peace a chance
    All we are saying is give peace a chance
    All we are saying is give peace a chance
    All we are saying is give peace a chance
    All we are saying is give peace a chance
    All we are saying is give peace a chance
    All we are saying is give peace a chance





    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sat May 24 23:56:53 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Montag000019, 19.05.2025 um 17:58 schrieb The Starmaker:
    "Klaatu barada nikto"????

    Easy, it comes from Albert Einstein language...German!!!!


    KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language.

    This is not German!

    I have read, that this sentence means:

    God will not destroy the Earth (possibly: this time?).

    You are not thinking like an einstein...Klaatu in German

    Not German. Estonian

    https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&text=klaatu&op=translate


    is speled Klass or Klaus meaning as the charater is portrayed..."victory of the people".

    Not a variant of "Klaus"
    I gave you the script, I gave you the movie...can yous not THINK foryourselvesalready!!!!!

    Think on this

    https://web.archive.org/web/20040628163125/http://www.dreamerwww.com/fanfilm/fanfilm2.htm
    "The Language of Klaatu"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 26 08:03:51 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Sonntag000025, 25.05.2025 um 07:56 schrieb Gronk:
    The Starmaker wrote:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Montag000019, 19.05.2025 um 17:58 schrieb The Starmaker:
    "Klaatu barada nikto"????

    Easy, it comes from Albert Einstein language...German!!!!


    KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language.

    This is not German!

    I have read, that this sentence means:

    God will not destroy the Earth (possibly: this time?).

    You are not thinking like an einstein...Klaatu in German

    Not German. Estonian

    https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&text=klaatu&op=translate



    'Klaatu barada nikto"

    Seems to be composed from three different Eastern European languages:

    Klaatu is Estionian and means 'cloak'
    barada is Russian and means 'nobody'
    nikto is Slovak and means 'nobody'.

    ...

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Mon May 26 10:47:46 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Sonntag000025, 25.05.2025 um 07:56 schrieb Gronk:
    The Starmaker wrote:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Montag000019, 19.05.2025 um 17:58 schrieb The Starmaker:
    "Klaatu barada nikto"????

    Easy, it comes from Albert Einstein language...German!!!!


    KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language.

    This is not German!

    I have read, that this sentence means:

    God will not destroy the Earth (possibly: this time?).

    You are not thinking like an einstein...Klaatu in German

    Not German. Estonian

    https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&text=klaatu&op=translate


    'Klaatu barada nikto"

    Seems to be composed from three different Eastern European languages:

    Klaatu is Estionian and means 'cloak'
    barada is Russian and means 'nobody'
    nikto is Slovak and means 'nobody'.

    ...

    TH

    I'm surprised you didin't add it is also a name of a cat food brand in Afganastian!!!!



    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 27 09:07:50 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Montag000026, 26.05.2025 um 19:47 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Sonntag000025, 25.05.2025 um 07:56 schrieb Gronk:
    The Starmaker wrote:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Montag000019, 19.05.2025 um 17:58 schrieb The Starmaker:
    "Klaatu barada nikto"????

    Easy, it comes from Albert Einstein language...German!!!!


    KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language.

    This is not German!

    I have read, that this sentence means:

    God will not destroy the Earth (possibly: this time?).

    You are not thinking like an einstein...Klaatu in German

    Not German. Estonian

    https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&text=klaatu&op=translate


    'Klaatu barada nikto"

    Seems to be composed from three different Eastern European languages:

    Klaatu is Estionian and means 'cloak'
    barada is Russian and means 'nobody'
    nikto is Slovak and means 'nobody'.

    ...

    TH

    I'm surprised you didin't add it is also a name of a cat food brand in Afganastian!!!!


    I have simply used 'google translator' and used the 'detect language'
    function.

    This is usually quite ok and certainly better than my own knowledge of
    Eastern European languages.

    I have actually some knowledge, but very little, since foreign languages
    are not really 'my thing'.

    I have tried Russian, Czechoslovakian, Hungarian, Lithuanian at some
    times in the past, but with not very much success.

    E.g. I can still decipher Cyrillic letters and know a few words in
    Russian. But that's it.

    I also have been in Lithuania and wanted to learn that language. But the
    Baltic languages are REALLY hard to learn. (same with Hungarian).


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 28 08:02:32 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Mittwoch000028, 28.05.2025 um 03:37 schrieb William Hyde:

    KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language. >>>>>>>
    This is not German!

    I have read, that this sentence means:

    God will not destroy the Earth (possibly: this time?).

    You are not thinking like an einstein...Klaatu in German

    Not German. Estonian

    https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&text=klaatu&op=translate >>>>>

    'Klaatu barada nikto"

    Seems to be composed from three different Eastern European languages:

    Klaatu is Estionian and means 'cloak'
    barada is Russian and means 'nobody'
    nikto is Slovak and means 'nobody'.

    ...

    TH

    I'm surprised you didin't add it is also a name of a cat food brand in
    Afganastian!!!!


    I have simply used 'google translator' and used the 'detect language'
    function.

    This is usually quite ok and certainly better than my own knowledge of
    Eastern European languages.

    I have actually some knowledge, but very little, since foreign
    languages are not really 'my thing'.

    I have tried Russian, Czechoslovakian, Hungarian, Lithuanian at some
    times in the past, but with not very much success.

    E.g. I can still decipher Cyrillic letters and know a few words in
    Russian. But that's it.

    I also have been in Lithuania and wanted to learn that language. But
    the Baltic languages are REALLY hard to learn. (same with Hungarian).

    They are reconstructing Prussian, so you will soon have four Baltic
    languages to learn!

    I'm actually living in the former capital of prussia and can assure you,
    that Prussians speak German.


    TH


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Laron Todorovsky@21:1/5 to William Hyde on Thu May 29 07:15:03 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    William Hyde wrote:

    And I can assure you that the aboriginal Prussians did not speak German,
    but Prussian, a language related to Lithuanian.

    impossible; lithuanian is gay, a fag province territory of Greater Russia;

    hopefully you soon will learn to speak proper modern Russian in Siberia, bulding icebreakers, infrastructures, nuclear power plants, you dirty
    natzi pig.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 31 08:51:08 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Am Donnerstag000029, 29.05.2025 um 09:15 schrieb Laron Todorovsky:
    William Hyde wrote:

    And I can assure you that the aboriginal Prussians did not speak German,
    but Prussian, a language related to Lithuanian.

    impossible; lithuanian is gay, a fag province territory of Greater Russia;


    The Baltic states were at some times in the past colonies of the
    'Germanic Order'.

    Lithuania was also once a huge kingdom and ruled over a large part of
    Eastern Europe.

    The were also once a Polish province.

    And they were once part of the Soviet Union.


    The part with the communist era is generally in bad memories, because
    the Baltic states suffered from enormous losses in Stalin's time.

    E.g. Latvia lost 800.000 from a total population of 4 million in Siberia.

    I can not assure, that this number is correct, but that was the number
    they told me in Riga.

    So we have a generally strong nationalism there and very strong
    antipathy against Russia.


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 31 08:41:43 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Mittwoch000028, 28.05.2025 um 23:11 schrieb William Hyde:
    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Mittwoch000028, 28.05.2025 um 03:37 schrieb William Hyde:

    KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German
    language.

    This is not German!

    I have read, that this sentence means:

    God will not destroy the Earth (possibly: this time?).

    You are not thinking like an einstein...Klaatu in German

    Not German. Estonian

    https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&text=klaatu&op=translate >>>>>>>

    'Klaatu barada nikto"

    Seems to be composed from three different Eastern European languages: >>>>>>
    Klaatu is Estionian and means 'cloak'
    barada is Russian and means 'nobody'
    nikto is Slovak and means 'nobody'.

    ...

    TH

    I'm surprised you didin't add it is also a name of a cat food brand in >>>>> Afganastian!!!!


    I have simply used 'google translator' and used the 'detect
    language' function.

    This is usually quite ok and certainly better than my own knowledge
    of Eastern European languages.

    I have actually some knowledge, but very little, since foreign
    languages are not really 'my thing'.

    I have tried Russian, Czechoslovakian, Hungarian, Lithuanian at some
    times in the past, but with not very much success.

    E.g. I can still decipher Cyrillic letters and know a few words in
    Russian. But that's it.

    I also have been in Lithuania and wanted to learn that language. But
    the Baltic languages are REALLY hard to learn. (same with Hungarian).

    They are reconstructing Prussian, so you will soon have four Baltic
    languages to learn!

    I'm actually living in the former capital of prussia and can assure
    you, that Prussians speak German.

    I am talking, as I said above, about reconstructing Prussian, which
    would be unnecessary if anyone spoke it today.

    Ok, there was a language called 'Prussian' some time ago, which now has apparently vanished.

    Well, that seems to be the fate of a large number of small languages
    around the globe.

    This has mainly to do with things like 'globalisation' or the internet.

    Also mobility is much greater today than in ancient times. That's why
    small languages are slowly fading away.

    Sorry for that, but that's how this goes.

    I think you are talking about Berlin, capital of Brandenburg-Prussia,
    later shortened to "Prussia".  I am talking about the original Prussia, later known as "East Prussia".

    Well, the former capital of East Prussia was 'Königsberg'.
    But as far as I know, they spoke German there, too.

    E.g. Emanuel Kant lived there and I know, that he spoke German.

    They had a kind of accent an spoke a German dialect in East Prussia, but
    that was still German.

    Possibly much earlier, there was an ethnic group, which spoke 'Prussian'.

    That is actually possible, even if I have never heard about this.
    And I can assure you that the aboriginal Prussians did not speak German,
    but Prussian, a language related to Lithuanian.

    The descendants of those people now speak German, Polish, or in some
    cases other languages, but there is a movement to revive the original
    tongue, using old manuscripts as a start (the bible, I believe, was translated into Prussian).  Which was the basis of my quip, above.  I
    don't actually expect that you will have to learn Prussian. Or that
    anyone will.

    It is an extremely obscure idea, to revitalise an old and vanished
    language, to honor an ethnicity, which had also vanished.

    See: there have be tons of wars in what today is Germany.

    In the so called 30-yeas-war most of Prussia was depopulated.

    Then there were WW1 and WW2 which depopulated East Prussia totally.

    Later came polish and Russian people to East Prussia and the
    Germans/Prussians went to Western Germany.

    I know some decendents from these refugees and they all speak German and
    have certainly no incentive to learn Prussian.

    Germans who inhabited the region centuries later came to be called "Prussians", which was geographically but not ethnically correct, except
    in as much as some of  them had ancestors who were aboriginal Prussians. This sense of the word "Prussian" dominates today to the extent that
    most people do not know anything of the original Prussians.

    This is a really weired idea and difficult to understand, because it
    contains the word 'Prussian' with too many meanings.

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Coy Shahbanov@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Sat May 31 15:15:54 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Mittwoch000028, 28.05.2025 um 23:11 schrieb William Hyde:
    I am talking, as I said above, about reconstructing Prussian, which
    would be unnecessary if anyone spoke it today.

    Ok, there was a language called 'Prussian' some time ago, which now has apparently vanished.

    because it never existed, you brainwashed fool. The TV programing works.

    𝗧𝗵𝗲_𝗨𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗻_𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲_𝗮𝗿𝗲_𝗻𝗼𝘄_𝗺𝗼𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘇𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝘁𝗼_𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸
    𝗼𝗿_𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿_𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻_𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗲𝗿𝘀_𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝗺𝗲𝗻
    https://www.bi%74%63%68%75te.com/video/8T0bxUXbjuWA

    Uprising in Ukraine. The media won't show you this because it doesn't fit
    the narrative. Ukrainians do not want more war.

    Hope they castrate the traitors and send their balls to jewlensky

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Sat May 31 23:13:41 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Sonntag000025, 25.05.2025 um 07:56 schrieb Gronk:
    The Starmaker wrote:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Montag000019, 19.05.2025 um 17:58 schrieb The Starmaker:
    "Klaatu barada nikto"????

    Easy, it comes from Albert Einstein language...German!!!!


    KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language.

    This is not German!

    I have read, that this sentence means:

    God will not destroy the Earth (possibly: this time?).

    You are not thinking like an einstein...Klaatu in German

    Not German. Estonian

    https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&text=klaatu&op=translate

    'Klaatu barada nikto"

    Seems to be composed from three different Eastern European languages:

    Klaatu is Estionian and means 'cloak'
    barada is Russian and means 'nobody'
    nikto is Slovak and means 'nobody'.

    Not one of the German.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 1 09:39:56 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Samstag000031, 31.05.2025 um 23:28 schrieb William Hyde:
    ...

    E.g. Emanuel Kant lived there and I know, that he spoke German.

    Kant may have had some Baltic ancestors on his father's side, but the
    last known Prussian speakers date from more than a decade before his
    birth.  And I have no reason to believe that his father spoke it.

    Cornish died out (mostly) a bit later, in the late 1700s, but it has
    been successfully revived, with many speakers today.

    The difference being that the Cornish know  that they are Cornish, while most people with Old Prussian ancestry think of themselves as Germans,
    Poles, or Lithuanians.

    There is a line in "The Tin Drum" where in 1944 an East Prussian
    resident says "We were here before the Germans or Russians".  Whether
    that's a fabrication on Grass' part or such people existed I do not
    know.  There is no indication that the character speaks Prussian, as far
    as I can recall.


    They had a kind of accent an spoke a German dialect in East Prussia,
    but that was still German.

    Possibly much earlier, there was an ethnic group, which spoke 'Prussian'.

    That is actually possible, even if I have never heard about this.

    Not possibly, certainly.

    Have you heard of the Wends?  Founders of Berlin (well, sort of)? There
    are still about 80,000 people, known nown as Sorbs, who speak the
    language in Germany, mostly in Saxony and Brandenburg.

    The name "Berlin" itself may come from an old Slavic word for "Swamp".

    It seems that all European nations have these fascinating minorities somewhere, largely forgotten, sometimes even by their descendants.

    I can assure you, that Wends and Sorbs are not forgotten!

    Actually the Sorbs have a certain privileged status as a minority in
    Germany.

    It is of course well known, that the region of current Berlin and
    Brandenburg was in former times the home of slavic people.

    There is a village in southern Poland where the inhabitants speak an
    unusual version of German.  Their ancestors arrived from the extreme
    west of Germany hundreds of years ago and their original tongue was
    strongly influenced by Dutch or perhaps Frisian.  Regrettably, I've lost the  reference I have for this.

    Dutch is actually relatively close to German and could also be regarded
    as proper English name for 'German'.

    But the British used 'German' instead of 'Dutch' because 'Dutch' was
    already in use for the language of the Netherlands.

    'German' is mainly a misnomer, because the language is called 'Deutsch',
    not 'German'.

    'German' stems from ancient Rome and from the language 'Latin', which
    the 'Germans' didn't speak.

    The 'Germans' are in most cases also not descendents of the tribes,
    which the Romans named 'Germanes', because those tribes settled mainly
    in current Denmark.

    It is an extremely obscure idea, to revitalise an old and vanished
    language, to honor an ethnicity, which had also vanished.

    It may seem obscure to you,but it's actually not that rare.  On the one
    hand there's the desire to save languages that are nearly extinct, on
    the other to revive languages that have only recently vanished.
    Comparatively recently, that is.

    Well, ok.

    Sure, it can be a nice adventure, to revitalise an old language.

    People do all sorts of strange things as a hobby, so why not 'revitalise Prussian'.


    Though - and I cannot stress this enough - nobody has to learn these languages.  There is, however, a rock group in Lithuania which has taken
    to singing some of its works in Prussian.

    I'v been in Lithuania, but couldn't understand a word and would not
    recognize, if a rock-band sings in Prussian.

    (actually a few word were possible)

    See: there have be tons of wars in what today is Germany.

    In the so called 30-yeas-war most of Prussia was depopulated.

    Actually East Prussia was relatively undamaged in the 30 years war
    itself.  It was occupied by Sweden for most of it and saw little
    fighting, compared to most of the rest of Germany.  The ruler of Brandenburg-Prussia tried his best to remain neutral in the war.

    But the Great Northern War which followed a couple of generations later, together with the plague and famine that came with it, killed about 30%
    of the population.  It was about this time that the last Old Prussian speakers vanished.

    Sure.

    Prussia had a particularily bad fate.

    But these people were smart...


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruz@21:1/5 to Governor Swill on Sun Jun 1 00:26:12 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 31/5/25 21:55, Governor Swill wrote:
    This has mainly to do with things like 'globalisation' or the internet.
    Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
    Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
    Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language. Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
    second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
    and lately Chinese.

    Also mobility is much greater today than in ancient times. That's why
    small languages are slowly fading away.
    Yep.


    The story is from the boot if Italy to Nice, each village could
    communicate with adjacent villages. There was no one spot it
    switched between Italian and French. Once they drew a border with
    Italy on one side and France on the other, language and other
    customs diverge. It is modern nationalism where governments want
    people to belong to them based on where they drew lines.

    It is why Balkans have such a problem. Walk along a road and one
    family is Bosnian, the next is Serbian, then Bosnian. People of
    different 'nations' are so thoroughly mixed, you cannot draw
    lines without separating families or merging enemies.

    Young kids get frisky and do not always pay attention to what
    nation they are expected to fall in live with.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lloyal Balagurov@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Sun Jun 1 08:48:30 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    The 'Germans' are in most cases also not descendents of the tribes,
    which the Romans named 'Germanes', because those tribes settled mainly
    in current Denmark.

    nonsense, gearmons are stinking ukrans trying to speak engilsh. That
    region, you all are khazar goys refugees, trying to speak engilsh. That's
    why you want more land to steal. That's why ZOG. That's why all the
    fucking EU is purely khazar goy ZOG. Look on a map and read history, to undrestand more.

    The North Atlantic Terrorist Organization started putting bombs in trains
    in Italy, Tuscany and Emilia Romagna precisely, back in the seventies, provoking hundreds of innocent people deaths. Fifty years later times have changed, but the terrorist nature of the Western nazi-fascist globalist
    mob is just the same. Blowing up other countries energy pipelines at the
    bottom of the seas.

    This has British SAS fingerprints all over it ! —> The Brits are pure
    filth; everyone knows this. Russia needs to attack London in some way. Yes
    it will mean escalation, but the Brits will back down in short order. The Americans will NOT take on the Russians for the British. Besides, the
    Yanks do not have the capability; they’re too feeble; the Houthi’s destroyed them (a bunch of camel jockeys wearing dresses & sandals).

    Russia led by coward Putin who wants to please Stupid Trump are facing embarrassment in world public opinion because they failed to totally
    destroy the satanic neo Nazi Zelensatan and his western supporters in
    Ukraine.

    the putins are just like Iran, they are doing nothing. Traitors. A poor
    country like Yemen is doing everything.

    https://www.rt.com/russia/618432-ukraine-terrorist-enclave-train-sabotage/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sun Jun 1 23:10:49 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Sonntag000025, 25.05.2025 um 07:56 schrieb Gronk:

    I'm surprised you didin't add it is also a name of a cat food brand in Afganastian!!!!

    It is? Cite?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 2 17:43:54 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Sonntag000001, 01.06.2025 um 09:26 schrieb Siri Cruz:
    On 31/5/25 21:55, Governor Swill wrote:
    This has mainly to do with things like 'globalisation' or the internet.
    Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
    Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
    Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
    Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
    second languages today.  English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
    and lately Chinese.

    Also mobility is much greater today than in ancient times. That's why
    small languages are slowly fading away.
    Yep.


    The story is from the boot if Italy to Nice, each village could
    communicate with adjacent villages. There was no one spot it switched
    between Italian and French. Once they drew a border with Italy on one
    side and France on the other, language and other customs diverge. It is modern nationalism where governments want people to belong to them based
    on where they drew lines.

    This was very similar in central Europe.

    East of the river 'Elbe' there was a region, where people spoke slavic languages.

    This is actually a huge family of relatively closely related languages.

    It started with Prussians, Sorbs and Wends in the West and went on to
    Poland, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Belarus and Russia.

    They all spoke languages, which had gradually changed from West to East,
    but belonged to the same family of languages.

    It was much later, that nations were created and languages 'nationalized'.

    So, in a way, the people of central Europe were a mixture of all sorts
    of people from all over the place and not an ethnic or political nation.

    It is why Balkans have such a problem. Walk along a road and one family
    is Bosnian, the next is Serbian, then Bosnian. People of different
    'nations' are so thoroughly mixed, you cannot draw lines without
    separating families or merging enemies.

    These families were once all Yugoslavians, and it would have been much
    better, if they stayed Yugoslavians.

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 2 18:49:14 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Sonntag000001, 01.06.2025 um 23:57 schrieb William Hyde:
    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Samstag000031, 31.05.2025 um 23:28 schrieb William Hyde:


    Dutch is actually relatively close to German

    Indeed.  When in the Netherlands I found that my knowledge of English, combined with the decayed remnants of my German, allowed me to read most signage.   After a week or two I was able to read more complex inscriptions.

    I got through a page of "The Lord of the Rings" in Norwegian by similar means, though it probably helped that I'd already read it in English.

    and could also be regarded
    as proper English name for 'German'.

    It's an odd situation.


    The English name you after one group mentioned by the Romans, the French after another, but the actual descendants of the Romans at least make a
    stab at the right name.

    The Irish use the same group as the English, but the Welsh follow the
    French model, as do the Spanish.

    You have the same situation as Greece, which foreigners have been
    misnaming since 500 BC.  And of course there are more such examples.


    But the British

    Not all the British, see above.

     used 'German' instead of 'Dutch' because 'Dutch' was
    already in use for the language of the Netherlands.

    I wish I could believe they were  that rational, but I doubt it.

    I can find no Anglo-Saxon word for "Germany".  They had words for
    various tribes, for the Franks and the Burgundians, and "Denmark" was a
    word, but no word for the lands where German speaking people lived.
    Perhaps they just called it "the old country".

    There was no country at that time, where all German speakers lived.

    German was actually a language, which was spoken in many areas of Europe
    and possibly beyond.

    Modern Germany was founded in 1871 and was created by fusing together
    about 1000 different mainly tiny entities.

    Prior to that year there was no Germany and certainly also not at the
    times of the Anglo-Saxons.

    So, the Anglo-Saxons had no need to name a country, which didn't exist.

    French took the 'Alemanes', which were a people or tribe, which possibly
    stem from the south-west of Europe and settled in the south-west of Germany.

    Romans used a general term (like in many other cases), and called all
    the people from the North of the limes 'Germanes'.

    This word was, of course, not used by the 'Germanes', who also didn't
    call their country 'Germany' (which, btw, hadn't existed at that time).


    So by the time the English felt the need for a word describing the area,
    they probably just went with the Latin, the more so as most literate
    people at the time were in the church.

    English is (in my opinion) actually closer related to Latin than current Italian.

    (possibly all the Romans went to England)



    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 3 09:11:02 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Dienstag000003, 03.06.2025 um 00:49 schrieb William Hyde:
    ...
    The English name you after one group mentioned by the Romans, the
    French after another, but the actual descendants of the Romans at
    least make a stab at the right name.

    The Irish use the same group as the English, but the Welsh follow the
    French model, as do the Spanish.

    You have the same situation as Greece, which foreigners have been
    misnaming since 500 BC.  And of course there are more such examples.

    ;
    But the British

    Not all the British, see above.

      used 'German' instead of 'Dutch' because 'Dutch' was
    already in use for the language of the Netherlands.

    I wish I could believe they were  that rational, but I doubt it.

    I can find no Anglo-Saxon word for "Germany".  They had words for
    various tribes, for the Franks and the Burgundians, and "Denmark" was
    a word, but no word for the lands where German speaking people lived.
    Perhaps they just called it "the old country".

    There was no country at that time, where all German speakers lived.

    German was actually a language, which was spoken in many areas of
    Europe and possibly beyond.

    Modern Germany was founded in 1871 and was created by fusing together
    about 1000 different mainly tiny entities.

    Prior to that year there was no Germany and certainly also not at the
    times of the Anglo-Saxons.


    So, the Anglo-Saxons had no need to name a country, which didn't exist.



    Actually the "Kingdom of Germany" dates from the breakup of
    Charlemagne's empire, formed in the Treaty of Verdun in 843.  It was
    later absorbed into the Holy Roman Empire, which was later renamed
    (circa 1500) "The Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation". Which I
    presume is why the 1871 state was the second empire.


    https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regnum_Teutonicum

    The 'Regnum Teutonicum' was obviously named after the Teutons.

    This was a people who lived in the norther region of Denmark and do not
    belong to the set of people, which build the population of present day
    Germany.

    Actually all the tribes, which were called 'Germanes' by the Romans,
    stem from the regions, which belonged to Denmark.


    Naturally, the word used for "German" in the above varies from place to
    place - wikipedia is helpful here, giving:

    "The Kingdom of Germany or German Kingdom (Latin: regnum Teutonicorum 'kingdom of the Germans', regnum Teutonicum 'German kingdom',[1] regnum Alamanie "kingdom of Germany",[2] German: Deutsches Königreich)"

    so the Anglo-Saxons really did need a name, and they went with Caesar's version.

    'Angeln' is the name of a region in the north of Schleswig Holstein,
    which was a part of Denmark, too. That was the region, were the
    Anglo-Saxons came from.

    The German state 'Sachsen' is in no way related to Saxons, because 'Sax'
    was the name of an ancient weapon (kind of ax).

    These Anglo-Saxons settled also in 'Niedersachsen', but most likely
    didn't speak German or called themselves 'Germanes'.

    So, why should they call their kingdom 'Germany'?

    French took the 'Alemanes', which were a people or tribe, which
    possibly stem from the south-west of Europe and settled in the south-
    west of Germany.

    Romans used a general term (like in many other cases), and called all
    the people from the North of the limes 'Germanes'.

    This word was, of course, not used by the 'Germanes', who also didn't
    call their country 'Germany' (which, btw, hadn't existed at that time).


    So by the time the English felt the need for a word describing the
    area, they probably just went with the Latin, the more so as most
    literate people at the time were in the church.

    English is (in my opinion) actually closer related to Latin than
    current Italian.

    "This is not true".

    "I do not believe this"

    "This is not the case".

    Only the  third of these remarks has a word arising from Latin.


    I have learned two languages in school (English and Latin), but tried to
    learn a few more.

    Among this was actually Italian.

    To my great surprise, the knowledge of Latin didn't make it easier to
    learn Italian.

    Instead I could see more similarities in the English language to Latin
    (for whatever reason).

    Possibly the Romans went to England and lived there for some time (after
    the destruction of Rome).

    ...

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 4 08:05:44 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Dienstag000003, 03.06.2025 um 12:17 schrieb Governor Swill:
    On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 18:49:14 +0200, Thomas Heger <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    Am Sonntag000001, 01.06.2025 um 23:57 schrieb William Hyde:
    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Samstag000031, 31.05.2025 um 23:28 schrieb William Hyde:


    Dutch is actually relatively close to German

    Indeed.  When in the Netherlands I found that my knowledge of English,
    combined with the decayed remnants of my German, allowed me to read most >>> signage.   After a week or two I was able to read more complex
    inscriptions.

    I got through a page of "The Lord of the Rings" in Norwegian by similar
    means, though it probably helped that I'd already read it in English.

    and could also be regarded
    as proper English name for 'German'.

    It's an odd situation.


    The English name you after one group mentioned by the Romans, the French >>> after another, but the actual descendants of the Romans at least make a
    stab at the right name.

    The Irish use the same group as the English, but the Welsh follow the
    French model, as do the Spanish.

    You have the same situation as Greece, which foreigners have been
    misnaming since 500 BC.  And of course there are more such examples.

    >
    > But the British

    Not all the British, see above.

     used 'German' instead of 'Dutch' because 'Dutch' was
    > already in use for the language of the Netherlands.

    I wish I could believe they were  that rational, but I doubt it.

    I can find no Anglo-Saxon word for "Germany".  They had words for
    various tribes, for the Franks and the Burgundians, and "Denmark" was a
    word, but no word for the lands where German speaking people lived.
    Perhaps they just called it "the old country".

    There was no country at that time, where all German speakers lived.

    German was actually a language, which was spoken in many areas of Europe
    and possibly beyond.

    Modern Germany was founded in 1871 and was created by fusing together
    about 1000 different mainly tiny entities.

    Prior to that year there was no Germany and certainly also not at the
    times of the Anglo-Saxons.

    So, the Anglo-Saxons had no need to name a country, which didn't exist.

    Angles - Angle land - England.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angeln

    This is a peninsula in (now) northern Germany, which formerly belonged
    to Denmark.

    In ancient time this was Denmark, since Schleswig Holstein was part of
    Denmark until the:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Schleswig_War

    So, the people of Schleswig Holstein are more blond and blue-eyed then
    usual Germans and belong to the Scandinavian type and speak to some
    parts also Danish.

    This is, because that region was for the most parts of modern history a
    part of Denmark.

    So 'angles' were actually Wikings and Danish people.

    This was also the case for Cimbern and Teutones.


    Germany ended in the North in Hamburg at that time (even if Germany was
    founded a little later).

    Today this is all different and that had to do with an earlier and
    devastating war, called 'Great Northern War':

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Northern_War

    This war is actually important today, because in a way Vladimir Putin is influenced by that war and apparently tries to continue that war today.

    That is quite an idiotic concept, but nevertheless seems to be the
    motivation of the Russians.


    ...


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 4 08:55:24 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Dienstag000003, 03.06.2025 um 20:41 schrieb William Hyde:
    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Dienstag000003, 03.06.2025 um 00:49 schrieb William Hyde:
    ...
    The English name you after one group mentioned by the Romans, the
    French after another, but the actual descendants of the Romans at
    least make a stab at the right name.

    The Irish use the same group as the English, but the Welsh follow
    the French model, as do the Spanish.

    You have the same situation as Greece, which foreigners have been
    misnaming since 500 BC.  And of course there are more such examples. >>>>>
    ;
    But the British

    Not all the British, see above.

      used 'German' instead of 'Dutch' because 'Dutch' was
    already in use for the language of the Netherlands.

    I wish I could believe they were  that rational, but I doubt it.

    I can find no Anglo-Saxon word for "Germany".  They had words for
    various tribes, for the Franks and the Burgundians, and "Denmark"
    was a word, but no word for the lands where German speaking people
    lived. Perhaps they just called it "the old country".

    There was no country at that time, where all German speakers lived.

    German was actually a language, which was spoken in many areas of
    Europe and possibly beyond.

    Modern Germany was founded in 1871 and was created by fusing
    together about 1000 different mainly tiny entities.

    Prior to that year there was no Germany and certainly also not at
    the times of the Anglo-Saxons.

    ;
    So, the Anglo-Saxons had no need to name a country, which didn't
    exist.
    ;


    Actually the "Kingdom of Germany" dates from the breakup of
    Charlemagne's empire, formed in the Treaty of Verdun in 843.  It was
    later absorbed into the Holy Roman Empire, which was later renamed
    (circa 1500) "The Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation". Which I
    presume is why the 1871 state was the second empire.


    https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regnum_Teutonicum

    The 'Regnum Teutonicum' was obviously named after the Teutons.

    This was a people who lived in the norther region of Denmark and do
    not belong to the set of people, which build the population of present
    day Germany.

    Actually all the tribes, which were called 'Germanes' by the Romans,
    stem from the regions, which belonged to Denmark.


    Naturally, the word used for "German" in the above varies from place
    to place - wikipedia is helpful here, giving:

    "The Kingdom of Germany or German Kingdom (Latin: regnum Teutonicorum
    'kingdom of the Germans', regnum Teutonicum 'German kingdom',[1]
    regnum Alamanie "kingdom of Germany",[2] German: Deutsches Königreich)" >>>
    so the Anglo-Saxons really did need a name, and they went with
    Caesar's version.

    'Angeln' is the name of a region in the north of Schleswig Holstein,
    which was a part of Denmark, too. That was the region, were the Anglo-
    Saxons came from.

    The German state 'Sachsen' is in no way related to Saxons, because
    'Sax' was the name of an ancient weapon (kind of ax).

    These Anglo-Saxons  settled also in 'Niedersachsen', but most likely
    didn't speak German or called themselves 'Germanes'.

    So, why should they call their kingdom 'Germany'?


    My point is that circa 850 the Anglo-Saxons in England needed a name for
    this new kingdom.  Ango-Saxon missionaries, active in Germany at the
    time, would have been well aware that the word "German" was not in use there.  But as Latin speakers they probably went with the Latin example,
    and used "Germania".  Which was easy to remember because every Latin
    speaker had read Caesar's memoirs.

    Irish missionaries were also prominent in Germany (in fact Rome
    commanded Anglo-Saxon missionaries to go to Germany specifically to
    counter the Irish, who were regarded as heretical - how times change),
    and it seems that they, too, went with the Latin example.


    Which was actually correct, because tribes named 'Germanes' were
    actually Scandinavians.

    Modern Germany is not part of scandinavia, but south and occupies a part
    of Central Europe.

    So, 'Germanic' is an atribute belonging to certain tribes, who settled
    in southern Scandinavia and northern Germany.

    Those scandinavians were predominately blond, while Germans were not.

    The confusion stems from the use of the Roman term 'Germanes', which was
    used indicriminately for all northern people by the Romans.

    Better would be to concentrate on ethnicity, culture and languages.

    The language in Germany is called 'Deutsch' and the language is quite
    different to what Danes speak.

    So: 'Mare Germanicum' (for 'North Sea') means actually 'Danish Sea' and
    not 'German Sea'.

    Also Wikings and (Anglo-) Saxons were not really German tribes, because
    this country is named after the language 'Deutsch' and the Wikinigs
    spoke most likely Danish.

    It is notable that the Welsh, an independent people, disagreed.

    There are certainly many issues like this. But it would be certainly
    misleading to discuss thoses issues here, too.
    ...


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 6 00:03:26 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger <[email protected]>
    Am Mittwoch000028, 28.05.2025 um 23:11 schrieb William Hyde:
    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Mittwoch000028, 28.05.2025 um 03:37 schrieb William Hyde:


    They are reconstructing Prussian, so you will soon have four Baltic
    languages to learn!

    I'm actually living in the former capital of prussia and can assure
    you, that Prussians speak German.

    I am talking, as I said above, about reconstructing Prussian, which
    would be unnecessary if anyone spoke it today.

    Ok, there was a language called 'Prussian' some time ago, which now has
    apparently vanished.

    Well, that seems to be the fate of a large number of small languages
    around the globe.

    This has mainly to do with things like 'globalisation' or the internet.

    Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
    Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
    Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language. Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
    second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
    and lately Chinese.

    Globalisation has a more economic oriented definition.
    But it works here to have as a handle. You kinda have
    to go back to the days of colonization to really see
    this and its long term effects. Peoples were subjugated
    and since the speakers of a language were often small in
    number it didn't take much to put a language on the
    skids. (Prussian speakers probably weren't small in
    number, though.)

    The internet doesn't have much to do with the
    disappearance of a language. Forms of mass
    communication, specifically something like radio
    and then movies and tv, can have and did have
    a tremendous impact. They brought a dominant
    (and uniform) language into (remote) places with
    little effort. This can't be undersestimated. Even
    regional accents are disappearing.

    Also mobility is much greater today than in ancient times. That's why
    small languages are slowly fading away.

    Yep.
    Mobility also has little to do with this process
    unless you count the mobility of an incoming
    people/culture. Historically if a language is
    dying out its because it pool of speakers is
    smaller and that's where the absorbation effects
    show. Conquered, IOW...

    Reconstructing Prussian? Hmmm, youtube has some stuff
    purporting to be Prussian. Odd sound.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to Governor Swill on Sat Jun 7 23:44:32 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Governor Swill wrote:
    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 00:03:26 -0600, Gronk wrote:

    The internet doesn't have much to do with the
    disappearance of a language. Forms of mass
    communication, specifically something like radio
    and then movies and tv, can have and did have
    a tremendous impact. They brought a dominant
    (and uniform) language into (remote) places with
    little effort. This can't be undersestimated. Even
    regional accents are disappearing.

    That bit is thanks to movies, radio and TV. A version of any given
    language, a standard, that is understandable to all speakers must be
    used.

    https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2025/05/16/southern-accent-decline-virginia-research


    News readers usually speak American standard.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 9 07:04:30 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:
    Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger <[email protected]>
    Am Mittwoch000028, 28.05.2025 um 23:11 schrieb William Hyde:
    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Mittwoch000028, 28.05.2025 um 03:37 schrieb William Hyde:


    They are reconstructing Prussian, so you will soon have four Baltic
    languages to learn!

    I'm actually living in the former capital of prussia and can assure
    you, that Prussians speak German.

    I am talking, as I said above, about reconstructing Prussian, which
    would be unnecessary if anyone spoke it today.

    Ok, there was a language called 'Prussian' some time ago, which now has
    apparently vanished.

    Well, that seems to be the fate of a large number of small languages
    around the globe.

    This has mainly to do with things like 'globalisation' or the internet.

    Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
    Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
    Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language. Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common second languages today.  English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
    and lately Chinese.

    German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.


    Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun.

    Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.

    The language itself has also disadvantages.

    This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to
    call 'manuals'.

    These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence
    the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas.


    English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most speakers of English as a second language:

    English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)

    English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases.


    German has also disadvantages, as it doesn't sound good and has a
    complicated grammar.


    Japanese is way too difficult to learn and also based on writing in symbols.


    Italian and French sound nice, but that's almost all they are better
    for. Especially writing is difficult in French.


    Spanish is actually ok in most aspects and relatively easy to learn.

    But the best alternative is 'simplified standard English', which has few special rules and much less words (compared to what the British
    upperclass speaks).
    ...


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruz@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Sun Jun 8 23:49:31 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 8/6/25 22:04, Thomas Heger wrote:
    English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant
    for most speakers of English as a second language:

    English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)

    English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special
    cases.

    It appears all languages are equally complex among thew
    phonology, lexicon, syntax, and morphology. Possibly excepting
    the first few generation of a creole.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruz@21:1/5 to Governor Swill on Tue Jun 10 18:23:22 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 10/6/25 3:56, Governor Swill wrote:
    This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European
    branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues, especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old
    French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class.
    For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it
    with fine wine and called it pork.


    Modern English spelling is mostly Old English words with Old
    French spelling which ignores a Middle English vowel shift.

    Latin and Greek borrowings retain their original spelling
    contrary to English spelling.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 11 08:01:43 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
    On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:
    Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger
    <snip>
    > Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
    > Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
    > Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language. >>> > Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common >>> > second languages today.  English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian >>> > and lately Chinese.

    German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.


    Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun.

    Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.

    The language itself has also disadvantages.

    This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to
    call 'manuals'.

    These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence
    the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas.

    English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs
    can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.

    Sure.

    But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.


    The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers
    almost certainly bad speakers of English.

    This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny
    than useful.


    English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most
    speakers of English as a second language:

    English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)

    English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases.

    This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European
    branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues, especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old
    French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class.
    For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it
    with fine wine and called it pork.


    English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the
    English language.

    Keltic languages
    Latin
    Danish
    French
    German
    Dutch
    Hindi
    Kisuaheli
    ...

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Fri Jun 13 10:14:46 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
    On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:
    Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger
    <snip>
    > Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
    > Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
    > Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
    > Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common >>> > second languages today.� English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian >>> > and lately Chinese.

    German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.


    Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun.

    Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.

    The language itself has also disadvantages.

    This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to
    call 'manuals'.

    These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence
    the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas.

    English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs
    can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.

    Sure.

    But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.

    The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers almost certainly bad speakers of English.

    This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny
    than useful.


    English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most
    speakers of English as a second language:

    English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)

    English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases.

    This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European
    branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues, especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old
    French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class.
    For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it
    with fine wine and called it pork.

    English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the English language.

    Keltic languages
    Latin
    Danish
    French
    German
    Dutch
    Hindi
    Kisuaheli
    ...

    TH

    That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to get
    rid of
    all these foreign influences.

    In Mexicao they say "tele"
    In Britian they say "tele"...

    in the United States we say...Television!


    TELEVISION!!!!

    Learn English!


    It is the Official Language of The United States.


    Buy a Webster Dictionary today...


    Math is a language very little people know..

    anyone here speak penquin?


    Did you know dinosaurs didn't...roar? they tweet.



    tweet, tweet, twwet.














    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 14 09:03:28 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
    On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:
    Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger >>> <snip>
    > Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization. >>>>> > Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages. >>>>> > Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
    > Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common >>>>> > second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
    > and lately Chinese.

    German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.


    Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun.

    Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.

    The language itself has also disadvantages.

    This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to >>>> call 'manuals'.

    These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence >>>> the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas. >>>
    English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs
    can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.

    Sure.

    But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.

    The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers
    almost certainly bad speakers of English.

    This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny
    than useful.


    English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most >>>> speakers of English as a second language:

    English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)

    English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases.

    This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European
    branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues,
    especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old
    French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class.
    For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it
    with fine wine and called it pork.

    English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the
    English language.

    Keltic languages
    Latin
    Danish
    French
    German
    Dutch
    Hindi
    Kisuaheli
    ...

    TH

    That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to get
    rid of
    all these foreign influences.

    In Mexicao they say "tele"
    In Britian they say "tele"...

    in the United States we say...Television!


    TELEVISION!!!!

    Learn English!

    I can speak, read and write English quite well, even if that isn't perfect.

    But English is a second language for me. (My native language is German.)

    It is the Official Language of The United States.


    Buy a Webster Dictionary today...


    Math is a language very little people know..

    Math is not really a language, unless you are a computer. But I know
    same math, anyhow.


    anyone here speak penquin?


    Did you know dinosaurs didn't...roar? they tweet.


    Sure.
    Dinosaurs are acually not gone. Today they are called 'birds'.

    The dinosaurs are seemingling an extict class of animals, because they
    were so big.

    But dinosaurs were only big in comparison to us today, while at their
    time in the past they had simply usual size (for dinosaurs), because
    gravity was so low at that time (hence everything was much bigger).

    Also plants and insects were extremely huge and beetles, for instance,
    could have been larger than a horse today.


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Sat Jun 14 01:23:58 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
    On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:
    Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger >>> <snip>
    > Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization. >>>>> > Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages. >>>>> > Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
    > Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
    > second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
    > and lately Chinese.

    German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.


    Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun.

    Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.

    The language itself has also disadvantages.

    This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to >>>> call 'manuals'.

    These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence >>>> the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas. >>>
    English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs
    can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.

    Sure.

    But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.

    The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers >> almost certainly bad speakers of English.

    This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny >> than useful.


    English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most >>>> speakers of English as a second language:

    English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)

    English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases. >>>
    This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European
    branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues,
    especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old
    French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class. >>> For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it
    with fine wine and called it pork.

    English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the
    English language.

    Keltic languages
    Latin
    Danish
    French
    German
    Dutch
    Hindi
    Kisuaheli
    ...

    TH

    That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to get
    rid of
    all these foreign influences.

    In Mexicao they say "tele"
    In Britian they say "tele"...

    in the United States we say...Television!


    TELEVISION!!!!

    Learn English!

    I can speak, read and write English quite well, even if that isn't perfect.

    But English is a second language for me. (My native language is German.)


    You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want
    Germany to posses nucluer weapons????

    i don't see Germany today commiting genocide or bothering their
    neighbors...




    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Governor Swill on Sat Jun 14 19:57:44 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Governor Swill wrote:

    On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 09:03:28 +0200, Thomas Heger <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
    On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:
    Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger
    <snip>
    > Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization. >>>>>> > Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages. >>>>>> > Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
    > Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
    > second languages today.� English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
    > and lately Chinese.

    German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.


    Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun. >>>>>
    Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.

    The language itself has also disadvantages.

    This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to >>>>> call 'manuals'.

    These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence >>>>> the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas. >>>>
    English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs
    can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.

    Sure.

    But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.

    The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers >>> almost certainly bad speakers of English.

    This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny >>> than useful.


    English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most >>>>> speakers of English as a second language:

    English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)

    English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases. >>>>
    This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European
    branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues,
    especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old
    French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class. >>>> For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it
    with fine wine and called it pork.

    English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the >>> English language.

    Keltic languages
    Latin
    Danish
    French
    German
    Dutch
    Hindi
    Kisuaheli
    ...

    TH

    That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to get
    rid of
    all these foreign influences.

    In Mexicao they say "tele"
    In Britian they say "tele"...

    in the United States we say...Television!
    No, we don't. We say "TV".

    At your house they all speak in abbreviations cause Television has too
    many sylabbles.


    How about idiot box? or is 3 sylabbles still to much???


    how about boob tube?


    Don't get you panties in a knot trying to say Television!


    tveeeeeeee








    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 15 09:53:09 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 00:49 schrieb Governor Swill:
    On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:01:43 +0200, Thomas Heger <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the
    English language.

    Keltic languages
    Latin
    Danish
    French
    German
    Dutch
    Hindi
    Kisuaheli

    All stemming from Indo-European. Sanskrit.


    I would go that far to say, that Englishmen speak Sanskrit.


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 15 10:08:17 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
    On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:
    Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger >>>>> <snip>
    > Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization. >>>>>>> > Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages. >>>>>>> > Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
    > Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
    > second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
    > and lately Chinese.

    German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.


    Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun. >>>>>>
    Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.

    The language itself has also disadvantages.

    This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to >>>>>> call 'manuals'.

    These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence >>>>>> the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas. >>>>>
    English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs
    can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.

    Sure.

    But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.

    The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers >>>> almost certainly bad speakers of English.

    This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny >>>> than useful.


    English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most >>>>>> speakers of English as a second language:

    English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)

    English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases. >>>>>
    This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European
    branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues,
    especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old
    French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class. >>>>> For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it
    with fine wine and called it pork.

    English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the >>>> English language.

    Keltic languages
    Latin
    Danish
    French
    German
    Dutch
    Hindi
    Kisuaheli
    ...

    TH

    That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to get
    rid of
    all these foreign influences.

    In Mexicao they say "tele"
    In Britian they say "tele"...

    in the United States we say...Television!


    TELEVISION!!!!

    Learn English!

    I can speak, read and write English quite well, even if that isn't perfect. >>
    But English is a second language for me. (My native language is German.)


    You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want
    Germany to posses nucluer weapons????

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
    (what they told you in school was more or less a lie)

    But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult to use
    and extremely expensive.

    Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy has them,
    too, they are practically useless.

    But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to.


    i don't see Germany today commiting genocide or bothering their
    neighbors...

    Well, Germans had a share of such attrocities and have actually enough
    of that.

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Oleg Smirnov@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 15 14:45:26 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger, <news:[email protected]>
    Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:

    Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
    Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
    Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
    Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine.

    The so called Ukrainian in the so called Ukraine is
    mostly a product of the Polish colonization for about
    three centuries, when in the territory of the present
    day western & central Uraine most of the upper-class,
    landowners and urbanites, were Polish or Jewish while
    the populace, peasants were "Ukrainian".

    There are a few common
    second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
    and lately Chinese.

    German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.

    Indeed, - before the WW1, and also, then Germany had
    a big real chance to be another "center of world", but
    then it had been eventually bondaged and disciplined.

    Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun.

    Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.

    The language itself has also disadvantages.

    This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to
    call 'manuals'.

    These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence
    the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas.

    Not a good rationalization, seems Nazi-like, and it's not
    really a language feature. The modern Chinese-made goods
    are highly competitive because production is optimized to
    minimize costs, including the translator's expenses. Their
    vendors' approach is so that the product should speak for
    itself as such without a nicely written manual, especially
    when it comes to cheap products. They simply do not care.
    But if it turns out that a good manual is important for
    increasing sales then be sure there will be a good manual.

    English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most speakers of English as a second language:

    English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)

    English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases.

    Basically English is simple and especially convenient for
    writing and reading. Small number of letters, no diacritics
    and the like. Many "rules" may (and/or should) be ignored.

    ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From OrigInfoJunkie@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Sun Jun 15 10:08:50 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 6/15/2025 1:08 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
    On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:
    Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger
    <snip>
        > Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
        > Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
        > Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a >>>>>>>> language.
        > Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
        > second languages today.  English, French, Japanese, Spanish,
    Italian
        > and lately Chinese.

    German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.


    Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun. >>>>>>>
    Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.

    The language itself has also disadvantages.

    This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to >>>>>>> call 'manuals'.

    These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence >>>>>>> the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas. >>>>>>
    English is quite common in Asia.  In photos of cities English signs >>>>>> can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.

    Sure.

    But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.

    The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers >>>>> almost certainly bad speakers of English.

    This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny >>>>> than useful.


    English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most >>>>>>> speakers of English as a second language:

    English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)

    English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases. >>>>>>
    This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European
    branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues, >>>>>> especially French.   Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old >>>>>> French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class. >>>>>> For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it >>>>>> with fine wine and called it pork.

    English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the >>>>> English language.

    Keltic languages
    Latin
    Danish
    French
    German
    Dutch
    Hindi
    Kisuaheli
    ...

    TH

    That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to get >>>> rid of
    all these foreign influences.

    In Mexicao they say "tele"
    In Britian they say "tele"...

    in the United States we say...Television!


    TELEVISION!!!!

    Learn English!

    I can speak, read and write English quite well, even if that isn't perfect. >>>
    But English is a second language for me. (My native language is German.)


    You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want
    Germany to posses nucluer weapons????

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.

    Germany never had an atom bomb. The program was scuttled in 1942.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to OrigInfoJunkie on Sun Jun 15 17:52:54 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    OrigInfoJunkie <[email protected]> wrote in news:D6D3Q.1423448$[email protected]:

    On 6/15/2025 1:08 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
    On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:
    Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200,
    Thomas Heger
    <snip>
        > Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before
    globalization.     > Conquest, military and non military
    can wipe out small languages.     > Cultures can be
    absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
        > Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There >>>>>>>>> are a few common     > second languages today. 
    English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
        > and lately Chinese.

    German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.


    Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for >>>>>>>> fun.

    Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.

    The language itself has also disadvantages.

    This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they >>>>>>>> like to call 'manuals'.

    These little papers reveal a lack of something called
    'grammar', hence the language has a lack of possibility to
    express certain subtle ideas.

    English is quite common in Asia.  In photos of cities English
    signs can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.

    Sure.

    But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.

    The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese
    speakers almost certainly bad speakers of English.

    This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are
    more funny than useful.


    English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant >>>>>>>> for most speakers of English as a second language:

    English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)

    English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special >>>>>>>> cases.

    This is largely because English comes from the same Indo
    European branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance >>>>>>> languagues, especially French.   Owing to the Conquest, a huge >>>>>>> number of Old French words entered common usage in England,
    often delineating class. For example, Britons ate pigs, but the
    French conquerors served it with fine wine and called it pork.

    English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks
    in the English language.

    Keltic languages
    Latin
    Danish
    French
    German
    Dutch
    Hindi
    Kisuaheli
    ...

    TH

    That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to
    get rid of
    all these foreign influences.

    In Mexicao they say "tele"
    In Britian they say "tele"...

    in the United States we say...Television!


    TELEVISION!!!!

    Learn English!

    I can speak, read and write English quite well, even if that isn't
    perfect.

    But English is a second language for me. (My native language is
    German.)


    You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want
    Germany to posses nucluer weapons????

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.

    Germany never had an atom bomb. The program was scuttled in 1942.


    Germany rejected the research done by
    the top experts as "Jewish science" which
    hindered their progress considerably.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruz@21:1/5 to OrigInfoJunkie on Sun Jun 15 11:25:58 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 15/6/25 10:08, OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.

    Germany never had an atom bomb. The program was scuttled in 1942.

    Nuclear fission was discoverred in Germany.

    Once that was established the question shifted from science to
    technology.
    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alph Dmitrovsky@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Sun Jun 15 18:30:32 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Mitchell Holman wrote:

    Germany never had an atom bomb. The program was scuttled in 1942.

    Germany rejected the research done by
    the top experts as "Jewish science" which hindered their progress considerably.

    bullshit, they all the patents. You make shit up as you go. The Einstine
    was a gypsy gay stealing patents.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From OrigInfoJunkie@21:1/5 to Governor Swill on Sun Jun 15 12:58:42 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 6/15/2025 6:03 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
    On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 10:08:17 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.

    If they had been, Hitler would have used them.

    They didn't have an atomic bomb. The program was stopped in 1942, according to Albert Speer.


    (what they told you in school was more or less a lie)

    The reality was that Germany was following a different path to the
    same goal but it didn't work out. For one reason, the Norwegian
    resistance managed to destroy their supply of heavy water.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruz@21:1/5 to Governor Swill on Sun Jun 15 18:09:16 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 15/6/25 6:03, Governor Swill wrote:
    The reality was that Germany was following a different path to the
    same goal but it didn't work out. For one reason, the Norwegian
    resistance managed to destroy their supply of heavy water.

    Germany was following a dead end. They were fixated on heavy
    water. Fermi realised boron could be removed from graphite to
    serve the same purposed as heavy water. Fermi had a working
    reactor in 1942 while Germans were still playing with themselves
    in 1945. The reactor proved a self sustaining fission chain
    reaction was possible. More reactors followed and the plutonium
    was created.

    When enough of the science was known, purifying U235 was still an
    expensive technological challenge. Only the USA could fight a two
    front war and the expense of purification. Only when the USA had
    reactors it had plutonium.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruz@21:1/5 to Governor Swill on Sun Jun 15 18:13:54 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 14/6/25 17:54, Governor Swill wrote:
    On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 09:03:28 +0200, Thomas Heger <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
    On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:
    Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger >>>>> <snip>
    > Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization. >>>>>>> > Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages. >>>>>>> > Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
    > Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
    > second languages today.� English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
    > and lately Chinese.

    German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.


    Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun. >>>>>>
    Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.

    The language itself has also disadvantages.

    This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to >>>>>> call 'manuals'.

    These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence >>>>>> the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas. >>>>>
    English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs
    can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.

    Sure.

    But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.

    The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers >>>> almost certainly bad speakers of English.

    This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny >>>> than useful.


    English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most >>>>>> speakers of English as a second language:

    English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)

    English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases. >>>>>
    This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European
    branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues,
    especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old
    French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class. >>>>> For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it
    with fine wine and called it pork.

    English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the >>>> English language.

    Keltic languages
    Latin
    Danish
    French
    German
    Dutch
    Hindi
    Kisuaheli
    ...

    TH

    That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to get
    rid of
    all these foreign influences.

    In Mexicao they say "tele"
    In Britian they say "tele"...

    in the United States we say...Television!
    No, we don't. We say "TV".


    No, we do not. We say 'idiot box'.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From OrigInfoJunkie@21:1/5 to Siri Cruz on Sun Jun 15 17:59:11 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 6/15/2025 11:25 AM, Siri Cruz wrote:
    On 15/6/25 10:08, OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.

    Germany never had an atom bomb. The program was scuttled in 1942.

    Nuclear fission was discoverred in Germany.

    That's nice.

    *discovered*, you fucking idiot — only one fucking 'r'



    Once that was established the question shifted from science to technology.

    Germany never mastered it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Sun Jun 15 18:44:25 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
    On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:
    Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger
    <snip>
    > Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
    > Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
    > Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
    > Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
    > second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
    > and lately Chinese.

    German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.


    Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun. >>>>>>
    Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.

    The language itself has also disadvantages.

    This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to
    call 'manuals'.

    These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence >>>>>> the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas.

    English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs >>>>> can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.

    Sure.

    But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.

    The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers >>>> almost certainly bad speakers of English.

    This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny >>>> than useful.


    English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most
    speakers of English as a second language:

    English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)

    English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases. >>>>>
    This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European
    branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues, >>>>> especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old
    French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class. >>>>> For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it >>>>> with fine wine and called it pork.

    English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the >>>> English language.

    Keltic languages
    Latin
    Danish
    French
    German
    Dutch
    Hindi
    Kisuaheli
    ...

    TH

    That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to get >>> rid of
    all these foreign influences.

    In Mexicao they say "tele"
    In Britian they say "tele"...

    in the United States we say...Television!


    TELEVISION!!!!

    Learn English!

    I can speak, read and write English quite well, even if that isn't perfect.

    But English is a second language for me. (My native language is German.)


    You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want
    Germany to posses nucluer weapons????

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
    (what they told you in school was more or less a lie)

    But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult to use
    and extremely expensive.

    Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy has them,
    too, they are practically useless.

    But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to.


    Of course the Germans were the first to invent the atomic bomb...it
    was invented by a German, living in Germany and his name was...Albert
    Einstein.


    he just continued his invention with his German friends in the USA!


    And Albert Einstein's target was Japan, not Germany. He loves German
    people.






    i don't see Germany today commiting genocide or bothering their neighbors...

    Well, Germans had a share of such attrocities and have actually enough
    of that.

    TH


    a little genocide never hurt anyone...



    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Mon Jun 16 11:57:03 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity
    XPost: alt.binaries.pictures.scenic

    Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> wrote:

    OrigInfoJunkie <[email protected]> wrote in news:D6D3Q.1423448$[email protected]:

    On 6/15/2025 1:08 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
    On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:
    Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, >>>>>>>>> Thomas Heger
    <snip>
    Â Â Â > Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before >>>>>>>>> globalization. Â Â Â > Conquest, military and non military >>>>>>>>> can wipe out small languages. Â Â Â > Cultures can be
    absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
       > Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There >>>>>>>>> are a few common    > second languages today.Ã∞â•˚ >>>>>>>>> English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
    Â Â Â > and lately Chinese.

    German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.


    Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for >>>>>>>> fun.

    Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.

    The language itself has also disadvantages.

    This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they >>>>>>>> like to call 'manuals'.

    These little papers reveal a lack of something called
    'grammar', hence the language has a lack of possibility to
    express certain subtle ideas.

    English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English >>>>>>> signs can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.

    Sure.

    But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.

    The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese
    speakers almost certainly bad speakers of English.

    This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are
    more funny than useful.


    English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant >>>>>>>> for most speakers of English as a second language:

    English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)

    English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special >>>>>>>> cases.

    This is largely because English comes from the same Indo
    European branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance >>>>>>> languagues, especially French.  Owing to the Conquest, a huge >>>>>>> number of Old French words entered common usage in England,
    often delineating class. For example, Britons ate pigs, but the >>>>>>> French conquerors served it with fine wine and called it pork.

    English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks >>>>>> in the English language.

    Keltic languages
    Latin
    Danish
    French
    German
    Dutch
    Hindi
    Kisuaheli
    ...

    TH

    That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to >>>>> get rid of
    all these foreign influences.

    In Mexicao they say "tele"
    In Britian they say "tele"...

    in the United States we say...Television!


    TELEVISION!!!!

    Learn English!

    I can speak, read and write English quite well, even if that isn't
    perfect.

    But English is a second language for me. (My native language is
    German.)


    You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want
    Germany to posses nucluer weapons????

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.

    Germany never had an atom bomb. The program was scuttled in 1942.


    Germany rejected the research done by
    the top experts as "Jewish science" which
    hindered their progress considerably.

    Hi Mitchell, good to see that you are not only a fan of Rush Limbaugh,
    but also interested in math and physics.
    I'am sure that your fellow posters in a.b.pictures.scenic
    wouldn't want to miss your insights.

    Apart from that, you are wrong about it.
    Heisenberg was cleared as as being 'A good German' and an 'Aryan'
    by none other than Heinrich Himmler himself,

    Jan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wolf K@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Mon Jun 16 08:44:29 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity
    XPost: alt.binaries.pictures.scenic

    On 2025-06-16 05:57, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    [...]
    Jan



    Bye bye


    --
    Wolf K <https://kirkwood40.blogspot.com>
    What doesn't kill you mutates and tries again. (Comment in New York Times)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Mon Jun 16 09:46:20 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
    On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:
    Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger
    <snip>
    > Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
    > Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
    > Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
    > Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
    > second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
    > and lately Chinese.

    German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.


    Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun. >>>>>>
    Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.

    The language itself has also disadvantages.

    This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to
    call 'manuals'.

    These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence
    the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas.

    English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs >>>>> can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.

    Sure.

    But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.

    The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers
    almost certainly bad speakers of English.

    This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny
    than useful.


    English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most
    speakers of English as a second language:

    English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)

    English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases.

    This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European >>>>> branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues, >>>>> especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old >>>>> French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class.
    For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it >>>>> with fine wine and called it pork.

    English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the
    English language.

    Keltic languages
    Latin
    Danish
    French
    German
    Dutch
    Hindi
    Kisuaheli
    ...

    TH

    That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to get >>> rid of
    all these foreign influences.

    In Mexicao they say "tele"
    In Britian they say "tele"...

    in the United States we say...Television!


    TELEVISION!!!!

    Learn English!

    I can speak, read and write English quite well, even if that isn't perfect.

    But English is a second language for me. (My native language is German.)


    You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want Germany to posses nucluer weapons????

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
    (what they told you in school was more or less a lie)

    But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult to use
    and extremely expensive.

    Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy has them, too, they are practically useless.

    But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to.

    Of course the Germans were the first to invent the atomic bomb...it
    was invented by a German, living in Germany and his name was...Albert Einstein.

    he just continued his invention with his German friends in the USA!


    Let's not forget real History...

    it was Einstein who said:

    "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
    formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein


    His formula for the atomic bomb was invented in 1905 in Germany!
    Published in German!! Written in Geramn!!!

    The Germans invented the fucking atomic bomb...Einstein and his friends
    were those Germans!




    if you
    take away
    the shell
    of a snail...
    he's still
    a snail.



























    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to Wolf K on Mon Jun 16 19:56:19 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity
    XPost: alt.binaries.pictures.scenic

    Wolf K <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 2025-06-16 05:57, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    [...]
    Jan



    Bye bye

    Good to see another fan of Rush Limbaugh.
    Have Canadians gone crazy too?

    Jan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to William Hyde on Mon Jun 16 15:08:34 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    William Hyde wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    Siri Cruz wrote:

    On 15/6/25 6:03, Governor Swill wrote:

    The reality was that Germany was following a different path to the
    same goal but it didn't work out.  For one reason, the Norwegian
    resistance managed to destroy their supply of heavy water.

    Germany was following a dead end. They were fixated on heavy water.
    Fermi realised boron could be removed from graphite to serve the same
    purposed as heavy water. Fermi had a working reactor in 1942 while
    Germans were still playing with themselves in 1945. The reactor proved a
    self sustaining fission chain reaction was possible. More reactors
    followed and the plutonium was created.

    And even though the allies went with graphite, by 1945 we were producing considerable amounts of heavy water. More, I think, per month than
    German acquired in the whole war.

    William Hyde

    I prefer a high-gravity beer.

    --
    If you lose a son you can always get another, but there's only one
    Maltese Falcon.
    -- Sidney Greenstreet, "The Maltese Falcon"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 16 17:37:46 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    % wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
    William Hyde wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    Siri Cruz wrote:

    On 15/6/25 6:03, Governor Swill wrote:

    The reality was that Germany was following a different path to the
    same goal but it didn't work out.  For one reason, the Norwegian
    resistance managed to destroy their supply of heavy water.

    Germany was following a dead end. They were fixated on heavy water.
    Fermi realised boron could be removed from graphite to serve the same
    purposed as heavy water. Fermi had a working reactor in 1942 while
    Germans were still playing with themselves in 1945. The reactor proved a >>>> self sustaining fission chain reaction was possible. More reactors
    followed and the plutonium was created.

    And even though the allies went with graphite, by 1945 we were producing >>> considerable amounts of heavy water. More, I think, per month than
    German acquired in the whole war.

    William Hyde

    I prefer a high-gravity beer.

    i prefer a drank beer

    All beers asymptote to drank. :-)

    --
    Tritium will cream your genes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Mon Jun 16 16:58:27 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
    On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:
    Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger
    <snip>
    > Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
    > Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
    > Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
    > Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
    > second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
    > and lately Chinese.

    German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.


    Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun.

    Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.

    The language itself has also disadvantages.

    This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to
    call 'manuals'.

    These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence
    the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas.

    English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs >>>>> can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.

    Sure.

    But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.

    The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers
    almost certainly bad speakers of English.

    This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny
    than useful.


    English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most
    speakers of English as a second language:

    English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)

    English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases.

    This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European >>>>> branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues, >>>>> especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old >>>>> French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class.
    For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it >>>>> with fine wine and called it pork.

    English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the
    English language.

    Keltic languages
    Latin
    Danish
    French
    German
    Dutch
    Hindi
    Kisuaheli
    ...

    TH

    That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to get
    rid of
    all these foreign influences.

    In Mexicao they say "tele"
    In Britian they say "tele"...

    in the United States we say...Television!


    TELEVISION!!!!

    Learn English!

    I can speak, read and write English quite well, even if that isn't perfect.

    But English is a second language for me. (My native language is German.)


    You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want Germany to posses nucluer weapons????

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
    (what they told you in school was more or less a lie)

    But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult to use and extremely expensive.

    Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy has them, too, they are practically useless.

    But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to.

    Of course the Germans were the first to invent the atomic bomb...it
    was invented by a German, living in Germany and his name was...Albert Einstein.

    he just continued his invention with his German friends in the USA!

    Let's not forget real History...

    it was Einstein who said:

    "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
    formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein

    His formula for the atomic bomb was invented in 1905 in Germany!
    Published in German!! Written in Geramn!!!

    The Germans invented the fucking atomic bomb...Einstein and his friends
    were those Germans!

    if you
    take away
    the shell
    of a snail...
    he's still
    a snail.



    Did you see the selfie of Einstein and Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and his atomic bomb formula?

    https://content.time.com/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg












    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 17 07:36:29 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Sonntag000015, 15.06.2025 um 15:03 schrieb Governor Swill:
    On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 10:08:17 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.

    If they had been, Hitler would have used them.

    They have been used, but not by Germany.

    ...

    The Germans had also 'UFOs', named 'Haunebu IV', anti-aircraft rockets
    and also Jet-driven fighter planes.

    These were also not used to defend Germany, even if that was certainly necessary.

    The reason:

    'Hitler' was actually a British agent (according to Greg Hallet).

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 17 07:44:06 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Sonntag000015, 15.06.2025 um 20:25 schrieb Siri Cruz:
    On 15/6/25 10:08, OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.

    Germany never had an atom bomb. The program was scuttled in 1942.

    Nuclear fission was discoverred in Germany.

    Once that was established the question shifted from science to technology.

    Leo Scillard ('father of the atomic bomb') worked together with Albert
    Einstein in Berlin.

    Both invented and patented a device called 'Einstein fridge'.

    Students who wanted to replicate this thing found out, that it doesn't cool.

    The reason: this device has only one known use. It is used in fast
    breeding reactors!

    Therefore it is actually possible, that atomic bombs were build long
    before the advent of the Manhattan project and possibly in Germany long
    before the Nazis even came to power and with special help by physicists
    like Einstein and Szillard.


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 17 07:27:05 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Sonntag000015, 15.06.2025 um 13:45 schrieb Oleg Smirnov:
    ...
    Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun.

    Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.

    The language itself has also disadvantages.

    This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like
    to call 'manuals'.

    These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence
    the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas.

    Not a good rationalization, seems Nazi-like, and it's not really a
    language feature. The modern Chinese-made goods are highly competitive because production is optimized to minimize costs, including the
    translator's expenses. Their
    vendors' approach is so that the product should speak for
    itself as such without a nicely written manual, especially when it comes
    to cheap products. They simply do not care.
    But if it turns out that a good manual is important for increasing sales
    then be sure there will be a good manual.


    Products do not speak for themselves.

    Products themselves are actually only half of what the customers want.

    Usually manuals, software, warranties, repair service, parts supply,
    service manuals, advertising of the brand, fashion or similar are also
    part of what costumers want.

    So: a good company would take care of their market and would provide
    things like spare parts or installation services.

    But China is doing mainly manufactoring and in many cases nothing more
    than that and simple shipping stuff abroad in plastic bags.

    Instead of a manual these manufacturers put tiny pieces of paper into
    the box, which contain almost unreadable advices in five to ten
    different languages.


    English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for
    most speakers of English as a second language:

    English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)

    English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases.

    Basically English is simple and especially convenient for
    writing and reading. Small number of letters, no diacritics
    and the like. Many "rules" may (and/or should) be ignored.


    English could be stripped town to bare minimum and still remains
    undertandable.

    But that isn't English anymore, but kind of 'Pidgin-Redneck-dialect'.

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Tue Jun 17 00:58:11 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill: >>>>> On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:
    Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger
    <snip>
    > Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
    > Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
    > Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
    > Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
    > second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
    > and lately Chinese.

    German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.


    Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun.

    Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.

    The language itself has also disadvantages.

    This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to
    call 'manuals'.

    These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence
    the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas.

    English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs
    can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.

    Sure.

    But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.

    The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers
    almost certainly bad speakers of English.

    This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny
    than useful.


    English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most
    speakers of English as a second language:

    English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million) >>>>>>
    English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases.

    This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European >>>>> branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues,
    especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old >>>>> French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class.
    For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it
    with fine wine and called it pork.

    English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the
    English language.

    Keltic languages
    Latin
    Danish
    French
    German
    Dutch
    Hindi
    Kisuaheli
    ...

    TH

    That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to get
    rid of
    all these foreign influences.

    In Mexicao they say "tele"
    In Britian they say "tele"...

    in the United States we say...Television!


    TELEVISION!!!!

    Learn English!

    I can speak, read and write English quite well, even if that isn't perfect.

    But English is a second language for me. (My native language is German.)


    You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want Germany to posses nucluer weapons????

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
    (what they told you in school was more or less a lie)

    But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult to use and extremely expensive.

    Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy has them,
    too, they are practically useless.

    But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to.

    Of course the Germans were the first to invent the atomic bomb...it
    was invented by a German, living in Germany and his name was...Albert Einstein.

    he just continued his invention with his German friends in the USA!

    Let's not forget real History...

    it was Einstein who said:

    "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
    formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein

    His formula for the atomic bomb was invented in 1905 in Germany!
    Published in German!! Written in Geramn!!!

    The Germans invented the fucking atomic bomb...Einstein and his friends were those Germans!

    if you
    take away
    the shell
    of a snail...
    he's still
    a snail.


    Did you see the selfie of Einstein and Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and his atomic bomb formula?

    https://content.time.com/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg

    Now, let me give you a little insight (an accurate and deep intuitive understanding) to Albert Einstein's ...lies.


    He said: "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up
    my
    formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein



    "foreseen: to know in advance; be aware of beforehand; https://www.dictionary.com � browse � foreseen
    verb (used with object)?? foresaw, foreseen, foreseeing. to have
    prescience of; to know in advance;


    The TRUTH is, Albert Einstein knew in advance; was aware of beforehand;
    that the atomic bomb

    would be used on Japan.

    The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan in August, 1945...twice. But Albert Einstein was
    notified that the bomb would be dropped on Japan earlier that year in
    March.

    And he never mentioned it to ANYONE between March and August...not even
    once!


    Here is the memo Albert Einstein enclosed with his letter to FDR
    notifying of the March decision.

    https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1431098020930592777/photo/1




    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to William Hyde on Tue Jun 17 13:36:02 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.binaries.pictures.scenic

    William Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:

    J. J. Lodder wrote:
    Wolf K <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 2025-06-16 05:57, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    [...]
    Jan



    Bye bye

    Good to see another fan of Rush Limbaugh.
    Have Canadians gone crazy too?

    If I haven't yet, this group will do the job.

    I've been trying to kill afrb from this thread for a while. Maybe I
    will succeed this time.

    Succeeded. Allowing crossposts in the standard American nutter groups
    (RL, gun control, etc.) is a crime against usenet.
    Those people are trying to sabotage the few still functioning groups
    by dumping junk into them, and keeping the threads up.

    It's true that there were some very smart people working on the nazi
    atomic bomb program.

    Ten of them, arrested in 1945 and taken to Farm Hall:

    • Erich Bagge
    • Kurt Diebner
    • Walther Gerlach
    • Otto Hahn
    • Paul Harteck
    • Werner Heisenberg
    • Horst Korsching
    • Max von Laue
    • Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker
    • Karl Wirtz

    Several Nobel prize winners among them.
    Heisenberg pretended after the war that he hadn't failed,
    and that he had actively resisted the Nazi regime
    by deliberately not building the bomb.

    But reading Wheeler on the allied project, I get the impression that
    there were hundreds of such working there - many refugees from Europe.

    Certainly, and much of the scientific leadership.
    Oppenheimer, while American, had studied physics in Europe.
    The first 'all American' leading scientist was Richard Feynman,
    a youngster at the time.

    There is also much to be found in
    Richard Rhodes, 'The Making of the Atomic Bomb' <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Making_of_the_Atomic_Bomb>

    Jan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Oleg Smirnov@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 17 16:25:55 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger, <news:[email protected]>
    Am Sonntag000015, 15.06.2025 um 13:45 schrieb Oleg Smirnov:

    Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun.

    Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.

    The language itself has also disadvantages.

    This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to
    call 'manuals'.

    These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence
    the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas.

    Not a good rationalization, seems Nazi-like, and it's not really a
    language feature. The modern Chinese-made goods are highly competitive
    because production is optimized to minimize costs, including the
    translator's expenses. Their
    vendors' approach is so that the product should speak for
    itself as such without a nicely written manual, especially when it comes
    to cheap products. They simply do not care.
    But if it turns out that a good manual is important for increasing sales
    then be sure there will be a good manual.

    Products do not speak for themselves.

    Products themselves are actually only half of what the customers want.

    Usually manuals, software, warranties, repair service, parts supply,
    service manuals, advertising of the brand, fashion or similar are also
    part of what costumers want.

    So: a good company would take care of their market and would provide
    things like spare parts or installation services.

    But China is doing mainly manufactoring and in many cases nothing more
    than that and simple shipping stuff abroad in plastic bags.

    Instead of a manual these manufacturers put tiny pieces of paper into the box, which contain almost unreadable advices in five to ten different languages.

    Consumers may claim they want this and that, but what consumers
    really want is what they are really willing to pay money for, so
    as long as a product is well-sellable, there's no necessity to
    take the vocalism (if any) of [some part of] consumers to heart.
    If you dislike it then simply don't buy it. Developing theories
    about inferiority of language and the like is surely not a good rationalization.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 18 09:49:53 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Sonntag000015, 15.06.2025 um 21:58 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
    They didn't have an atomic bomb. The program was stopped in 1942,
    according to Albert Speer.

    Albert Speer was a top Nazi, too.

    These would lie to whatever question you ask.

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 18 09:56:36 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Montag000016, 16.06.2025 um 09:38 schrieb Governor Swill:
    On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 12:58:42 -0700, OrigInfoJunkie <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On 6/15/2025 6:03 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
    On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 10:08:17 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.

    If they had been, Hitler would have used them.

    They didn't have an atomic bomb.

    They didn't have an atomic bomb because Germany surrendered before
    they could get one built.

    The program was stopped in 1942, according to Albert Speer.

    Then what were the Nazis were doing with heavy water in 1944?

    The Norwegian ferry Hydro was sunk in Lake Tinnsjå (also known as Lake
    Tinn) on February 20, 1944, by Norwegian resistance fighters.

    "Norwegian heavy water sabotage" <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_heavy_water_sabotage>

    "Heavy Water War - The story" <https://www.visitnorway.com/listings/heavy-water-war-the-story/1474/>

    "Hitler's nuclear bomb dream was sunk on ferry" <https://www.9news.com.au/world/hitler-was-just-a-ferry-ride-away-from-building-his-nucelar-bomb-tv-show-reveals/cf96285a-9900-4b35-9b62-05c9e4f417f3>


    If the Nazis needed heavy water, they apparently wanted to build a
    hydrogen bomb!

    To that demand would fit, that Einstein and Szillard patented a device
    in Berlin in 1930, which is apparently used in fast breeding reactors.

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 18 10:04:04 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Montag000016, 16.06.2025 um 09:46 schrieb Governor Swill:

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.

    Germany never had an atom bomb. The program was scuttled in 1942.

    Nuclear fission was discoverred in Germany.

    That's nice.

    *discovered*, you fucking idiot — only one fucking 'r'



    Once that was established the question shifted from science to technology. >>
    Germany never mastered it.

    Exactly - but they didn't stop trying until allied forces overran all
    their research facilities and captured their scientists.

    At least the Americans must have believed in German atomic bombs,
    because the US forces rushed to Thuringia at the end of the war and to a
    region near Weimar, to capture a facility near 'Ohrdruf', where the
    Germans allegedly build atomic bombs.

    This would have been a really serious problem, because the German also
    built (under the direction of Wernher von Braun) ballistic missiles.

    Combined with the numerous and state of the art German submarines, that
    could have been chilling for the Americans.

    (Possible the 'Haunebu IV' flying disks would have been an even greater
    risk.)


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 18 10:07:22 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Montag000016, 16.06.2025 um 18:46 schrieb The Starmaker:
    ...

    You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want
    Germany to posses nucluer weapons????

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
    (what they told you in school was more or less a lie)

    But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult to use
    and extremely expensive.

    Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy has them, >>> too, they are practically useless.

    But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to.

    Of course the Germans were the first to invent the atomic bomb...it
    was invented by a German, living in Germany and his name was...Albert
    Einstein.

    he just continued his invention with his German friends in the USA!


    Let's not forget real History...

    it was Einstein who said:

    "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
    formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein

    E=m* c² was known before Einstein.

    His formula for the atomic bomb was invented in 1905 in Germany!
    Published in German!! Written in Geramn!!!

    The Germans invented the fucking atomic bomb...Einstein and his friends
    were those Germans!

    Leo Szillar was actually an Hungarian and Einstein most like Swiss.

    Fermi was Italian and Bohr imho Danish.


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 18 10:23:04 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Dienstag000017, 17.06.2025 um 09:58 schrieb The Starmaker:
    ...
    He said: "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up
    my
    formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein



    "foreseen: to know in advance; be aware of beforehand; https://www.dictionary.com › browse › foreseen
    verb (used with object)?? foresaw, foreseen, foreseeing. to have
    prescience of; to know in advance;


    The TRUTH is, Albert Einstein knew in advance; was aware of beforehand;
    that the atomic bomb

    would be used on Japan.

    The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan in August, 1945...twice. But Albert Einstein was
    notified that the bomb would be dropped on Japan earlier that year in
    March.

    And he never mentioned it to ANYONE between March and August...not even
    once!


    Here is the memo Albert Einstein enclosed with his letter to FDR
    notifying of the March decision.

    https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1431098020930592777/photo/1


    Apparently Einstein and Szillar wanted the atomic bombs to be dropped,
    but not on Japan.

    This would leave just one possible destination, which they apparently
    favored:

    GERMANY!!

    But, luckly for me and bad for Japan, war ended in Germany a little too
    early (in the view of Einstein).


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 18 10:28:43 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Dienstag000017, 17.06.2025 um 15:25 schrieb Oleg Smirnov:
    Thomas Heger, <news:[email protected]>
    Am Sonntag000015, 15.06.2025 um 13:45 schrieb Oleg Smirnov:

    Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun.

    Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.

    The language itself has also disadvantages.

    This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to >>>> call 'manuals'.

    These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence >>>> the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas. >>>
    Not a good rationalization, seems Nazi-like, and it's not really a
    language feature. The modern Chinese-made goods are highly competitive
    because production is optimized to minimize costs, including the
    translator's expenses. Their
    vendors' approach is so that the product should speak for
    itself as such without a nicely written manual, especially when it comes >>> to cheap products. They simply do not care.
    But if it turns out that a good manual is important for increasing sales >>> then be sure there will be a good manual.

    Products do not speak for themselves.

    Products themselves are actually only half of what the customers want.

    Usually manuals, software, warranties, repair service, parts supply,
    service manuals, advertising of the brand, fashion or similar are also
    part of what costumers want.

    So: a good company would take care of their market and would provide
    things like spare parts or installation services.

    But China is doing mainly manufactoring and in many cases nothing more
    than that and simple shipping stuff abroad in plastic bags.

    Instead of a manual these manufacturers put tiny pieces of paper into the
    box, which contain almost unreadable advices in five to ten different
    languages.

    Consumers may claim they want this and that, but what consumers
    really want is what they are really willing to pay money for, so
    as long as a product is well-sellable, there's no necessity to
    take the vocalism (if any) of [some part of] consumers to heart.
    If you dislike it then simply don't buy it. Developing theories
    about inferiority of language and the like is surely not a good rationalization.

    I personally think, that the Chineese themselves are not really happy
    with their language and their way of writing.

    These are very nasty problems, once you want to go into international trade.

    Costumers usually want all things possible and for zero price.

    But that is't possible, of course.

    So, some sort of negotians are requried about would shall be delivered
    and what is not necessary.

    Most likely a good manual in the language of your country will a
    standard for all products in the future.


    TH


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michele Balabuha@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Wed Jun 18 10:17:08 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    So, some sort of negotians are requried about would shall be delivered
    and what is not necessary.

    Most likely a good manual in the language of your country will a
    standard for all products in the future.

    I disagree, the local language is worse than english. They put things
    upside down. Never read a paper or a manual in gearmon, full of errors and misinterpretations. Like jew Einstine who was a gypsy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to Governor Swill on Wed Jun 18 06:56:30 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    In sci.physics Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 17:59:11 -0700, OrigInfoJunkie <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On 6/15/2025 11:25 AM, Siri Cruz wrote:
    On 15/6/25 10:08, OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.

    Germany never had an atom bomb. The program was scuttled in 1942.

    Nuclear fission was discoverred in Germany.

    That's nice.

    *discovered*, you fucking idiot ? only one fucking 'r'



    Once that was established the question shifted from science to technology. >>
    Germany never mastered it.

    Exactly - but they didn't stop trying until allied forces overran all
    their research facilities and captured their scientists.

    Actually all his successes caused Hitler to believe circa 1940 that the
    war would be over by 1941 and ordered research projects that couldn't be fielded by 1941 to be abandonded. A couple of years later reality set in
    and projects were restarted.


    --
    [email protected]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From OrigInfoJunkie@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Wed Jun 18 09:30:24 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 6/18/2025 1:07 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Montag000016, 16.06.2025 um 18:46 schrieb The Starmaker:
    ...

    You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today  doesn't want >>>>> Germany to posses nucluer weapons????

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
    (what they told you in school was more or less a lie)

    But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult to use >>>> and extremely expensive.

    Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy has them, >>>> too, they are practically useless.

    But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to.

    Of course the Germans were the first to invent the atomic bomb...it
    was invented by a German, living in Germany and his name was...Albert
    Einstein.

    he just continued his invention with his German friends in the USA!


    Let's not forget real History...

    it was Einstein who said:

    "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
    formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein

    E=m* c² was known before Einstein.

    Wrong.


    His formula for the atomic bomb was invented in 1905 in Germany!
    Published in German!! Written in Geramn!!!

    The Germans invented the fucking atomic bomb

    They did not.

    ...Einstein and his friends
    were those  Germans!

    Leo Szillar was actually an Hungarian and Einstein most like Swiss.

    Einstein was not born Swiss. He was a German Jew. He relinquished his German citizenship in 1896. He acquired Swiss citizenship in 1901 at the age of 21 (approaching age 22). He reacquired German (Prussian) citizenship in 1914, but later renounced it again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Wed Jun 18 09:18:31 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Montag000016, 16.06.2025 um 18:46 schrieb The Starmaker:
    ...

    You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want
    Germany to posses nucluer weapons????

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
    (what they told you in school was more or less a lie)

    But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult to use >>> and extremely expensive.

    Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy has them, >>> too, they are practically useless.

    But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to.

    Of course the Germans were the first to invent the atomic bomb...it
    was invented by a German, living in Germany and his name was...Albert
    Einstein.

    he just continued his invention with his German friends in the USA!


    Let's not forget real History...

    it was Einstein who said:

    "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
    formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein

    E=m* c² was known before Einstein.

    His formula for the atomic bomb was invented in 1905 in Germany!
    Published in German!! Written in Geramn!!!

    The Germans invented the fucking atomic bomb...Einstein and his friends were those Germans!

    Leo Szillar was actually an Hungarian and Einstein most like Swiss.

    Fermi was Italian and Bohr imho Danish.

    TH

    THIS IS INSANE!!!!

    WHAT ARE ALL THESE FOREINERS DOING IN OUR COUNTRY BUILDING ATOMIC BOMBS????

    they no even speeak inglish!


    Guaduaguaduafua, wat did he say? How did a wop get in there?


    Fermi?? Oh, dats right...i forgot...his wife is Jewish!


    can i have some mustard with the spahgetti??


    Fermi's wife like itallian stallions...


    she's a 'nice jewish girl' who don't like jewish guys...


    she even wote a book all about the atomic bomb, did you read it????

    Einstein did! It's on his book shelf on that photo the day he died.





    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to Governor Swill on Wed Jun 18 13:09:20 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 10:07:22 +0200, Thomas Heger <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    Am Montag000016, 16.06.2025 um 18:46 schrieb The Starmaker:
    ...

    You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want >>>>>> Germany to posses nucluer weapons????

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
    (what they told you in school was more or less a lie)

    But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult to use >>>>> and extremely expensive.

    Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy has them, >>>>> too, they are practically useless.

    But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to.

    Of course the Germans were the first to invent the atomic bomb...it
    was invented by a German, living in Germany and his name was...Albert
    Einstein.

    he just continued his invention with his German friends in the USA!


    Let's not forget real History...

    it was Einstein who said:

    "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
    formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein

    E=m* c² was known before Einstein.

    Sure, right ... everybody knows that.

    Cite, please.

    There's more to the story:

    <https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/was-einstein-the-first-to-invent-e-mc2/>

    His formula for the atomic bomb was invented in 1905 in Germany!
    Published in German!! Written in Geramn!!!

    The Germans invented the fucking atomic bomb...Einstein and his friends
    were those Germans!

    Leo Szillar was actually an Hungarian and Einstein most like Swiss.

    Fermi was Italian and Bohr imho Danish.

    In your opinion? Was he Danish or not?

    You makin' me hungry.... ^^^^^^

    --
    Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind.
    -- Mark Harrold

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Tulakov@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Wed Jun 18 17:50:07 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    In sci.physics Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote:
    Germany never mastered it.
    Exactly - but they didn't stop trying until allied forces overran all
    their research facilities and captured their scientists.

    Actually all his successes caused Hitler to believe circa 1940 that the
    war would be over by 1941 and ordered research projects that couldn't be fielded by 1941 to be abandonded. A couple of years later reality set in
    and projects were restarted.

    not true, pissrael is polish and ukran immigrants, in the job of stealing countries, if you want to know the truth. Here some proofs. They are
    stealing countries right now as we speak. Which is disgusting. They want
    to steal the entire Russian Federation to subjugate and enslave.

    𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗰𝗲_𝗢𝘄𝗲𝗻𝘀_𝘀𝗮𝘆𝘀_𝘆𝗼𝘂_𝗮𝗿𝗲_𝗡𝗢𝗧_𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝗖𝗛𝗢𝗦𝗘𝗡_𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲_𝗡𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘆𝗮𝗵𝘂
    https://b%69%74%63%68%75te.com/video/CZ1VbwTbBLrp

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Craig@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Wed Jun 18 18:25:16 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.

    That's why Hitler used them to win WW2.

    (what they told you in school was more or less a lie)

    All history is lies.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to Governor Swill on Wed Jun 18 15:41:02 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 10:23:04 +0200, Thomas Heger <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    Apparently Einstein and Szillar wanted the atomic bombs to be dropped,
    but not on Japan.

    How ignorant are you?

    These are results for einstein wanted a bomb dropped on germany
    Search instead for einstein wanted abomb dropped on germany

    AI Overview
    No, Albert Einstein did not want an atomic bomb dropped on Germany.
    While he did play a role in initiating the Manhattan Project to
    develop the atomic bomb, it was motivated by his fear that Nazi
    Germany would develop such a weapon first and use it to dominate the
    world. Einstein, a lifelong pacifist, deeply regretted his involvement
    later and described it as his "one great mistake".

    Einstein's other great mistake? The cosmological constant.

    (A little physics humor)

    --
    Reclaimer, spare that tree! Take not a single bit!
    It used to point to me, Now I'm protecting it.
    It was the reader's CONS That made it, paired by dot;
    Now, GC, for the nonce, Thou shalt reclaim it not.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruz@21:1/5 to Chris Ahlstrom on Wed Jun 18 13:58:02 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 18/6/25 12:41, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
    Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 10:23:04 +0200, Thomas Heger <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    Apparently Einstein and Szillar wanted the atomic bombs to be dropped,
    but not on Japan.

    How ignorant are you?

    These are results for einstein wanted a bomb dropped on germany
    Search instead for einstein wanted abomb dropped on germany

    AI Overview
    No, Albert Einstein did not want an atomic bomb dropped on Germany.
    While he did play a role in initiating the Manhattan Project to
    develop the atomic bomb, it was motivated by his fear that Nazi
    Germany would develop such a weapon first and use it to dominate the
    world. Einstein, a lifelong pacifist, deeply regretted his involvement
    later and described it as his "one great mistake".

    Einstein's other great mistake? The cosmological constant.

    (A little physics humor)


    Has that not been changed to the cosmological variable? The
    cosmological fudge factor?

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Wed Jun 18 14:47:13 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Dienstag000017, 17.06.2025 um 09:58 schrieb The Starmaker:
    ...
    He said: "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up
    my
    formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein



    "foreseen: to know in advance; be aware of beforehand; https://www.dictionary.com › browse › foreseen
    verb (used with object)?? foresaw, foreseen, foreseeing. to have
    prescience of; to know in advance;


    The TRUTH is, Albert Einstein knew in advance; was aware of beforehand; that the atomic bomb

    would be used on Japan.

    The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan in August, 1945...twice. But Albert Einstein was
    notified that the bomb would be dropped on Japan earlier that year in March.

    And he never mentioned it to ANYONE between March and August...not even once!


    Here is the memo Albert Einstein enclosed with his letter to FDR
    notifying of the March decision.

    https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1431098020930592777/photo/1


    Apparently Einstein and Szillar wanted the atomic bombs to be dropped,
    but not on Japan.

    This would leave just one possible destination, which they apparently favored:

    GERMANY!!

    Albert Einstein NEVER said he wanted the Germans to die. (why would he wanna kill his own people?)

    But Albert Einstein wanted Japan to die. (i guess they don't have Japanese Jewish people there)...


    There is this 'misconception' about Albert Einstein's atomic bomb
    that has existed for decades...

    He is 'just a scientists'. He wanted to build an atomic bomb just for ...fun! He had no intentions of killing Germans in 1905 when he came out with formular for the atomic bomb....

    he
    was
    just
    making
    an
    experiment!

    AN EXPERIMENT!


    he was just fooling around..


    you know..
    like Dr. Frankinstein.


    IT'S ALIVE!!!!


    EXPERIMENT:
    perform a scientific procedure, especially in a laboratory, to determine something.




    Like for example, scientist invented the Internet just so they can TALK to each other...


    they had no idea all the stupid people wanted to use it.













    But, luckly for me and bad for Japan, war ended in Germany a little too
    early (in the view of Einstein).

    TH

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Wed Jun 18 15:15:27 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Montag000016, 16.06.2025 um 18:46 schrieb The Starmaker:
    ...

    You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want
    Germany to posses nucluer weapons????

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
    (what they told you in school was more or less a lie)

    But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult to use >>> and extremely expensive.

    Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy has them, >>> too, they are practically useless.

    But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to.

    Of course the Germans were the first to invent the atomic bomb...it
    was invented by a German, living in Germany and his name was...Albert
    Einstein.

    he just continued his invention with his German friends in the USA!


    Let's not forget real History...

    it was Einstein who said:

    "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
    formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein

    E=m* c² was known before Einstein.

    Okay, so he STOLE the formula from sombody else...he was a GONIF!

    He also worked at the patent office and STOLE patents for others and
    they paid him to steal it.

    Is that against the law? Not Gonif law. In Isreal Gonif law it's okay to
    steal from
    others as long as they are not Jewish.


    Harvey Winstein ONLY raped women who WEREN'T Jewish!


    he's a nice jewish boy.






    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Wed Jun 18 22:17:00 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Mitchell Holman wrote:
    OrigInfoJunkie <[email protected]> wrote in


    Germany never had an atom bomb. The program was scuttled in 1942.


    Germany rejected the research done by
    the top experts as "Jewish science" which
    hindered their progress considerably.


    And many scientists left Germany due to such attitudes
    and policies.

    History is practically repeating itself...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to Governor Swill on Wed Jun 18 22:41:40 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Governor Swill wrote:
    On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 12:58:42 -0700, OrigInfoJunkie <[email protected]>
    On 6/15/2025 6:03 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
    On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 10:08:17 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.

    If they had been, Hitler would have used them.

    They didn't have an atomic bomb.

    They didn't have an atomic bomb because Germany surrendered before
    they could get one built.

    The program was stopped in 1942, according to Albert Speer.

    Then what were the Nazis were doing with heavy water in 1944?

    The Norwegian ferry Hydro was sunk in Lake Tinnsjå (also known as Lake
    Tinn) on February 20, 1944, by Norwegian resistance fighters.

    "Norwegian heavy water sabotage" <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_heavy_water_sabotage>

    "Heavy Water War - The story" <https://www.visitnorway.com/listings/heavy-water-war-the-story/1474/>

    "Hitler's nuclear bomb dream was sunk on ferry" <https://www.9news.com.au/world/hitler-was-just-a-ferry-ride-away-from-building-his-nucelar-bomb-tv-show-reveals/cf96285a-9900-4b35-9b62-05c9e4f417f3>

    But you believe Albert Speer.

    ALBERT SPEER!!

    <laughs and points>

    There's a fair amount of historical hype about the German
    program.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_nuclear_program_during_World_War_II

    "Developments took place in several phases,
    but in the words of historian Mark Walker, it
    ultimately became "frozen at the laboratory
    level" with the "modest goal" to "build a
    nuclear reactor which could sustain a nuclear
    fission chain reaction for a significant amount
    of time and to achieve the complete separation
    of at least tiny amounts of the uranium isotopes".
    The scholarly consensus is that it failed to
    achieve these goals, and that despite fears at
    the time, the Germans had never been close to
    producing nuclear weapons."

    Puffing and fluffing it up makes good copy.

    Somewheres I got a book on the Japanese program
    (couple boxes in the back room most likely). They
    were even further away.

    https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2003/03/07/national/japans-a-bomb-goal-still-long-way-off-in-45/


    https://www.nytimes.com/1978/01/07/archives/new-jersey-pages-japanese-data-show-tokyo-tried-to-make-world-war.html
    archived at
    https://archive.is/VlJ0f
    Japanese Data Show Tokyo Tried To Make World War II A‐Bomb

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 19 09:36:50 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Mittwoch000018, 18.06.2025 um 18:18 schrieb The Starmaker:



    The Germans invented the fucking atomic bomb...Einstein and his friends
    were those Germans!

    Leo Szillar was actually an Hungarian and Einstein most like Swiss.

    Fermi was Italian and Bohr imho Danish.

    TH

    THIS IS INSANE!!!!

    WHAT ARE ALL THESE FOREINERS DOING IN OUR COUNTRY BUILDING ATOMIC BOMBS????

    they no even speeak inglish!

    ...
    Germany had actually lost WWI and was an occupied country between the wars.


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 19 09:33:26 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Am Mittwoch000018, 18.06.2025 um 12:17 schrieb Michele Balabuha:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    So, some sort of negotians are requried about would shall be delivered
    and what is not necessary.

    Most likely a good manual in the language of your country will a
    standard for all products in the future.

    I disagree, the local language is worse than english. They put things
    upside down. Never read a paper or a manual in gearmon, full of errors and misinterpretations. Like jew Einstine who was a gypsy.

    Germany is most likely not the easiest language in the world and
    certainly many Germans don't speak German properly.

    But German is actually quite ok as a language and has also some
    benefits, compared to other languages.

    But especially Chinese writing is nasty.

    Also proper pronunciation of Chinese is really difficult, because it
    requires kind of 'singing' in different hights.

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 19 10:02:00 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Mittwoch000018, 18.06.2025 um 18:55 schrieb Governor Swill:

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.

    If they had been, Hitler would have used them.

    They didn't have an atomic bomb.

    They didn't have an atomic bomb because Germany surrendered before
    they could get one built.

    The program was stopped in 1942, according to Albert Speer.

    Then what were the Nazis were doing with heavy water in 1944?

    The Norwegian ferry Hydro was sunk in Lake Tinnsjå (also known as Lake >>>> Tinn) on February 20, 1944, by Norwegian resistance fighters.

    "Norwegian heavy water sabotage"
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_heavy_water_sabotage>

    "Heavy Water War - The story"
    <https://www.visitnorway.com/listings/heavy-water-war-the-story/1474/> >>>>
    "Hitler's nuclear bomb dream was sunk on ferry"
    <https://www.9news.com.au/world/hitler-was-just-a-ferry-ride-away-from- >>>> building-his-nucelar-bomb-tv-show-reveals/cf96285a-9900-4b35-9b62-05c9e4f417f3>


    If the Nazis needed heavy water, they apparently wanted to build a hydrogen bomb!

    No. Heavy water was critical to the German atomic bomb project.

    Don't bother. Heger is too busy being wrong to be teachable.

    What would you do with heavy water in Uranium bombs?

    And what use would you have for a fast breading reactor, if you don't
    want to create Plutonium?

    But supposed Plutonium was actually created at that time, then also
    heavy water for a hydrogen bomb would make some sense.


    TH



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 19 09:58:16 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Mittwoch000018, 18.06.2025 um 18:30 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
    On 6/18/2025 1:07 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Montag000016, 16.06.2025 um 18:46 schrieb The Starmaker:
    ...

    You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today  doesn't want >>>>>> Germany to posses nucluer weapons????

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
    (what they told you in school was more or less a lie)

    But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult to use >>>>> and extremely expensive.

    Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy has
    them,
    too, they are practically useless.

    But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to.

    Of course the Germans were the first to invent the atomic bomb...it
    was invented by a German, living in Germany and his name was...Albert
    Einstein.

    he just continued his invention with his German friends in the USA!


    Let's not forget real History...

    it was Einstein who said:

    "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
    formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein

    E=m* c² was known before Einstein.

    Wrong.


    His formula for the atomic bomb was invented in 1905 in Germany!
    Published in German!! Written in Geramn!!!

    The Germans invented the fucking atomic bomb

    They did not.

    ...Einstein and his friends
    were those  Germans!

    Leo Szillar was actually an Hungarian and Einstein most like Swiss.

    Einstein was not born Swiss. He was a German Jew. He relinquished his
    German citizenship in 1896. He acquired Swiss citizenship in 1901 at the
    age of 21 (approaching age 22). He reacquired German (Prussian)
    citizenship in 1914, but later renounced it again.

    The is the official CV, but i had doubts about its authenticity.


    In my view the official story was totally impossible.

    E.g. the family Einstein went from Ulm to Munich with Albert as an infant.

    Then they went from Munich to Pavia, Italy, but leaving their eldest son
    behind in Munich (as a teenager!).

    (To me this sounded, at least, rather strange.)


    Then Albert left Munich, too, denounced his German citizenship and
    reunited with his family in Pavia.

    BUT: Germans were and are a little picky about what childs could do and
    what they can't do.

    Denouncing their citizenship was most likely not allowed, until the
    teenager gets 'volljährig' at the age of 21 (today that is 18).

    So A.E. could not denounce his citizenship, unless he would be older
    than 21.

    Also unusual: Einstein denounced German citizenship without acquiring
    any other. This is illegal in Germany. I actually don't know, whether or
    not that was illegal in the former German Empire, too, but would guess
    that wasn't allowed then neither.


    After getting to Pavia Albert stayed there for some time (official stay
    was 3 month, while the neighboring Jesuit facility writes on their
    webpage, that Einstein lived next door for an entire year).

    But for that entire period of time he didn't go to school, even if that
    would have been mandatory.


    Later he went to Aarau, Switzerland, and visited school their (alone
    again, without family).

    This would raise two problems:
    how did he get permit to stay?
    how did he support his life alone in a foreign country?

    Later Einstein went to the prestigious university ETH in Zurich, still
    as stateless alien.

    But how did he do that and why was he allowed to attend that university
    by Swiss authorities?


    Later he became member of the staff of the Swiss patent bureau in Bern.

    That was even stranger, because the Swiss used the concept called
    'Beamter' in the German speaking world.

    This is a special status of the employees of the state and usually only accessible for born citizens.


    Now: ALL of the problems above could be easily solved, if we assume,
    that Einstein was actually Swiss and his name was not 'Einstein' and
    (most likely) he wasn't a Jew.

    Also a hint:

    Einstein spoke three languages of Switzerland (German, French, Italien) fluently, but failed to learn English in ten years at Princeton.


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruz@21:1/5 to Gronk on Thu Jun 19 01:07:14 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 18/6/25 21:41, Gronk wrote:
    "Developments took place in several phases,
    but in the words of historian Mark Walker, it
    ultimately became "frozen at the laboratory
    level" with the "modest goal" to "build a
    nuclear reactor which could sustain a nuclear
    fission chain reaction for a significant amount

    Nuclear reactors need a device to slow down neutrons so that the
    chain reaction is sustains at a low power. Weapons do not slow
    down neutrons. They sustain the reaction at a high power that
    cannot be contained.

    One way to slow down neutrons is let them bounce off heavy water
    molecules. Another is bounce off carbon atoms in graphite. In
    1943 graphite was contaminated with boron which removed neutrons
    altogether. So Germans decided to use heavy water which they
    became fixated on. They never could get enough so they never had
    any reactor or self-sustaining chain reaction. Fermi and
    Americans realised they could clean boron out of graphite. Fermi
    got the first reactor running in 1943. They built more reactors;
    they discoverred a new element in the reactor ash which led to
    breeder reactors and Plutonium as a fissile metal along with
    U235. Plutonium could be refined with chemistry.

    of time and to achieve the complete separation
    of at least tiny amounts of the uranium isotopes".

    All Uranium isotopes have the same chemistry so it requires very
    expensive methods depending on slightly different nucleus
    weights. It requires a lot of electricity, space, and machinery.
    Only the USA could afford this whilst fighting a war.

    The scholarly consensus is that it failed to
    achieve these goals, and that despite fears at

    Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just
    scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved
    Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs.

    the time, the Germans had never been close to
    producing nuclear weapons."

    Bohr had a conversation which he interpretted as Germany was
    active on a Uranium bomb. Germany had enough technological and
    scientific talent, it was possible they might be working on it.
    US and UK had no certain knowledge.

    Puffing and fluffing it up makes good copy.

    Somewheres I got a book on the Japanese program
    (couple boxes in the back room most likely). They
    were even further away.

    The USSR was also working on it. By 1944 any country with a
    physics department knew it was a possibility and a rough idea how
    to do a Little Boy weapon (slamming two junks of Uranium together).

    What crippled everyone but the US was the industrial oomph needed
    while fighting a war. Also a Fatman weapon could not be imagined
    until a reactor was working and creating Plutonium.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruz@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Thu Jun 19 01:13:53 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 19/6/25 1:02, Thomas Heger wrote:
    What would you do with heavy water in Uranium bombs?

    You do not. Germany wanted it as a nuclear reactor moderator.

    And what use would you have for a fast breading reactor, if you
    don't want to create Plutonium?

    You need a reactor to even discover Plutonium.

    But supposed Plutonium was actually created at that time, then
    also heavy water for a hydrogen bomb would make some sense.

    No heavy water in a fusion weapon. Tritium is needed but not
    bound to hydrogen.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruz@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Thu Jun 19 01:23:05 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 19/6/25 0:58, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Also unusual: Einstein denounced German citizenship without
    acquiring any other. This is illegal in Germany. I actually don't
    know, whether or not that was illegal in the former German
    Empire, too, but would guess that wasn't allowed then neither.

    I can renounce my US citizenship. The US would not recognise that
    because I am still in the US and they can exercise their
    jurisdiction over me. If I first move to Bali, the US cannot do
    anything to me, so their opinion of legality is irrelevant.

    Unless Germany was going to charge into Italy or Switzerland,
    what they decided was illegal was unenforceable.

    After his papers were published, he lived at a German university
    as a teacher. When he felt in danger he fled the continent.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Oleg Smirnov@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 19 12:55:31 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger, <news:[email protected]>
    Am Dienstag000017, 17.06.2025 um 15:25 schrieb Oleg Smirnov:

    If you dislike it then simply don't buy it. Developing theories
    about inferiority of language and the like is surely not a good
    rationalization.

    I personally think, that the Chineese themselves are not really happy with their language and their way of writing.

    Narrower focus on the way of writing seems much more relevant.

    One of sensitive differences between alphabetic script vs writing
    with hieroglyphs is related to borrowing of foreign terms/words.
    In an alphabetic writing, you simply represent a foreign word
    - adapted to your phonetics - in your alphabet (like "sputnik" or
    "juchten"), and it's also applicable to foreign proper nouns. In
    a hieroglyphic writing, appropriation of foreign terms and proper
    nouns is more tricky. In the context of catch-up development, it's
    what those Chinese themselves might feel unhappy about. But it's
    not equal to "language lacking of possibility to express ideas".

    In particular, so was a rationale to switch Vietnam to a Latin-
    based alphabet. French colonial administration together with then
    Vietnamese ruling class decided that switching to an alphabetic
    script will make introduction of new concepts more digestible for
    local populace, while the underlying agenda was to promote novel
    progressive European trends there. But switching to a new writing
    system brings also certain losses, because next generations will
    be unable to read original old texts related to national cultural
    tradition (but, on the other hand, with the modern development of
    machine translation such considerations may become much less
    important).

    In broader context, Chinese writing started early, their division
    of labour (variety of social-economic roles and professional
    occupations within society, that contributes to language richness)
    also emerged early, - earlier than in Europe. And in contrast to
    some other ancient cultures, the cutural tradition was maintained uninterruptedly (although it significantly shifted backward some
    times throughout history, when simpler nomads from the north took
    over sedentary Chinese regions). So it'd be naive to think their
    language isn't rich enough in expressive means, but another issue
    is about good translation for Europeans, as the language (its all
    dialectal branches) is not close to the Indo-European family.

    These are very nasty problems, once you want to go into international
    trade.

    Costumers usually want all things possible and for zero price.

    But that is't possible, of course.

    So, some sort of negotians are requried about would shall be delivered and what is not necessary.

    Most likely a good manual in the language of your country will a standard
    for all products in the future.

    If you buy a product from a known / "big" Chinese brand, then an
    instruction there will likely be OK, and if you buy a cheap
    product from a little known or no-name vendor then there may well
    be a paper with hieroglyphs on one side and some Latin letters
    looking like a heavily broken English on the other side.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to Siri Cruz on Thu Jun 19 07:12:49 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Siri Cruz wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    On 18/6/25 12:41, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
    Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 10:23:04 +0200, Thomas Heger <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    Apparently Einstein and Szillar wanted the atomic bombs to be dropped, >>>> but not on Japan.

    How ignorant are you?

    These are results for einstein wanted a bomb dropped on germany
    Search instead for einstein wanted abomb dropped on germany

    AI Overview
    No, Albert Einstein did not want an atomic bomb dropped on Germany.
    While he did play a role in initiating the Manhattan Project to
    develop the atomic bomb, it was motivated by his fear that Nazi
    Germany would develop such a weapon first and use it to dominate the
    world. Einstein, a lifelong pacifist, deeply regretted his involvement
    later and described it as his "one great mistake".

    Einstein's other great mistake? The cosmological constant.

    (A little physics humor)

    Has that not been changed to the cosmological variable? The
    cosmological fudge factor?

    I dunno. It's a dark matter.

    --
    I'd put my money where my mouth is, but my mouth keeps moving.
    -- Larry Wall in <[email protected]>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From OrigInfoJunkie@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Thu Jun 19 08:54:04 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 6/19/2025 1:02 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Mittwoch000018, 18.06.2025 um 18:55 schrieb Governor Swill:

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.

    If they had been, Hitler would have used them.

    They didn't have an atomic bomb.

    They didn't have an atomic bomb because Germany surrendered before
    they could get one built.

    The program was stopped in 1942, according to Albert Speer.

    Then what were the Nazis were doing with heavy water in 1944?

    The Norwegian ferry Hydro was sunk in Lake Tinnsjå (also known as Lake >>>>> Tinn) on February 20, 1944, by Norwegian resistance fighters.

    "Norwegian heavy water sabotage"
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_heavy_water_sabotage>

    "Heavy Water War - The story"
    <https://www.visitnorway.com/listings/heavy-water-war-the-story/1474/> >>>>>
    "Hitler's nuclear bomb dream was sunk on ferry"
    <https://www.9news.com.au/world/hitler-was-just-a-ferry-ride-away-from- >>>>> building-his-nucelar-bomb-tv-show-reveals/
    cf96285a-9900-4b35-9b62-05c9e4f417f3>


    If the Nazis needed heavy water, they apparently wanted to build a hydrogen
    bomb!

    No. Heavy water was critical to the German atomic bomb project.

    Don't bother.  Heger is too busy being wrong to be teachable.

    What would you do with heavy water in Uranium bombs?

    The German scheme for an atomic bomb used heavy water for "moderation" to achieve critical mass from a smaller amount of unenriched uranium.

    Stop running your mouth about stuff you know nothing about.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruz@21:1/5 to Chris M. Thomasson on Thu Jun 19 16:40:08 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 19/6/25 12:28, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
    On 6/19/2025 4:12 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
    Siri Cruz wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    On 18/6/25 12:41, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
    Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 10:23:04 +0200, Thomas Heger
    <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    Apparently Einstein and Szillar wanted the atomic bombs to
    be dropped,
    but not on Japan.

    How ignorant are you?

    These are results for einstein wanted a bomb dropped on germany
    Search instead for einstein wanted abomb dropped on germany

    AI Overview
    No, Albert Einstein did not want an atomic bomb dropped on
    Germany.
    While he did play a role in initiating the Manhattan Project to
    develop the atomic bomb, it was motivated by his fear that Nazi
    Germany would develop such a weapon first and use it to
    dominate the
    world. Einstein, a lifelong pacifist, deeply regretted his
    involvement
    later and described it as his "one great mistake".

    Einstein's other great mistake? The cosmological constant.

    (A little physics humor)

    Has that not been changed to the cosmological variable? The
    cosmological fudge factor?

    I dunno. It's a dark matter.


    ;^D

    Please explain. I am in the dark.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 20 09:17:22 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Donnerstag000019, 19.06.2025 um 10:07 schrieb Siri Cruz:
    On 18/6/25 21:41, Gronk wrote:
    "Developments took place in several phases,
    but in the words of historian Mark Walker, it
    ultimately became "frozen at the laboratory
    level" with the "modest goal" to "build a
    nuclear reactor which could sustain a nuclear
    fission chain reaction for a significant amount

    Nuclear reactors need a device to slow down neutrons so that the chain reaction is sustains at a low power. Weapons do not slow down neutrons.
    They sustain the reaction at a high power that cannot be contained.

    One way to slow down neutrons is let them bounce off heavy water
    molecules. Another is bounce off carbon atoms in graphite. In 1943
    graphite was contaminated with boron which removed neutrons altogether.
    So Germans decided to use heavy water which they became fixated on. They never could get enough so they never had any reactor or self-sustaining
    chain reaction. Fermi and Americans realised they could clean boron out
    of graphite. Fermi got the first reactor running in 1943. They built
    more reactors; they discoverred a new element in the reactor ash which
    led to breeder reactors and Plutonium as a fissile metal along with
    U235. Plutonium could be refined with chemistry.

    of time and to achieve the complete separation
    of at least tiny amounts of the uranium isotopes".

    All Uranium isotopes have the same chemistry so it requires very
    expensive methods depending on slightly different nucleus weights. It requires a lot of electricity, space, and machinery. Only the USA could afford this whilst fighting a war.

    The scholarly consensus is that it failed to
    achieve these goals, and that despite fears at

    Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs.


    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them.

    But what about *before* the Americans came to Ohrdruf?

    How could we possibly know, whether the Germans had functioning bombs
    there, before the US-troups arrived there?

    We know, on the other hand, the US-troops HAD atomic bombs, after they
    have left Ohrdruf (and Thuringia).

    The US-troops made a very unusual move at the end of WWII and rushed far
    to the east, confiscasted everything and moved back, before the Soviets
    arrived in Thuringia.

    I know this with certainty from a former GI, who was a 'black' musician
    from Luisiana and was left behind in Leipzig, Saxonia, in 1945 after the US-troops went back west again.

    That guy lived his life in the former GDR and must have been a really
    strange 'black' guy, hardly speaking German after the end of GDR and
    beeing actually an US-citizen.


    ...

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 20 09:38:57 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Donnerstag000019, 19.06.2025 um 17:54 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
    On 6/19/2025 12:58 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Mittwoch000018, 18.06.2025 um 18:30 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
    On 6/18/2025 1:07 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Montag000016, 16.06.2025 um 18:46 schrieb The Starmaker:
    ...

    You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today  doesn't want >>>>>>>> Germany to posses nucluer weapons????

    Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
    (what they told you in school was more or less a lie)

    But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult
    to use
    and extremely expensive.

    Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy
    has them,
    too, they are practically useless.

    But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to. >>>>>>
    Of course the Germans were the first to invent the atomic bomb...it >>>>>> was invented by a German, living in Germany and his name was...Albert >>>>>> Einstein.

    he just continued his invention with his German friends in the USA! >>>>>

    Let's not forget real History...

    it was Einstein who said:

    "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
    formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein

    E=m* c² was known before Einstein.

    Wrong.


    His formula for the atomic bomb was invented in 1905 in Germany!
    Published in German!! Written in Geramn!!!

    The Germans invented the fucking atomic bomb

    They did not.

    ...Einstein and his friends
    were those  Germans!

    Leo Szillar was actually an Hungarian and Einstein most like Swiss.

    Einstein was not born Swiss. He was a German Jew. He relinquished his
    German citizenship in 1896. He acquired Swiss citizenship in 1901 at
    the age of 21 (approaching age 22). He reacquired German (Prussian)
    citizenship in 1914, but later renounced it again.

    The is the official CV, but i had doubts about its authenticity.

    You have no valid reason to doubt it.

    Actually I had already written my reasons for doubts here.

    There were different issues, but the most critical was Einsteins job in
    the patent office.

    As these patent offices store secrets of various degree, the employees
    are usually 'Beamte', for which (in those days) only born citizens were eligible.

    But actually ALL stations in Einstein's CV would make (much!) more
    sense, if he was actually a Swiss from birth.

    For instance Einstein spoke all three main languages of Switzerland
    (French, Italian and German) while failed to learn proper English after
    ten years in the USA.

    But if Einstein wasn't German, we could actually also assume, that his
    name wasn't 'Einstein' and possibly he wasn't even a Jew.

    ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 20 09:26:37 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Donnerstag000019, 19.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb Siri Cruz:

    Also unusual: Einstein denounced German citizenship without
    acquiring any other. This is illegal in Germany. I actually don't
    know, whether or not that was illegal in the former German
    Empire, too, but would guess that wasn't allowed then neither.

    I can renounce my US citizenship. The US would not recognise that
    because I am still in the US and they can exercise their jurisdiction
    over me. If I first move to Bali, the US cannot do anything to me, so
    their opinion of legality is irrelevant.

    Unless Germany was going to charge into Italy or Switzerland, what they decided was illegal was unenforceable.

    The concepts about citizenship were different in Germany (compared to
    the USA).

    Actually the German empire was a monarchy and citizens could not decide, whether they wanted to be citizens or not.

    The USA, on the other hand, was THE 'immigration nation' upon the globe.

    Germany had different rules, because in traditional monarchies couldn't
    simply go away.

    (peasants were 'owned')

    But in some cases emigration was allowed, but most likely not by teenagers.

    But in case of Einstein we had also the issue of WWI and whether or not
    it was possible to evade drafting by going to Italy.

    If it were illegal, than Einstein would have been a 'draft dodger' and
    would have been imprisoned once going back to Germany.

    TH
    ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brent Baidukov@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Fri Jun 20 14:53:21 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    For instance Einstein spoke all three main languages of Switzerland
    (French, Italian and German) while failed to learn proper English after
    ten years in the USA.

    But if Einstein wasn't German, we could actually also assume, that his
    name wasn't 'Einstein' and possibly he wasn't even a Jew.

    your poing seems reasonable, the gypsy jew Einstine was stealing patents
    in return for degrees. Was a traitor fag to his country and his family.

    also, the gypsy jew smellensky, a khazar goy of khazaria, is shitting his
    pants now, seeing what happens to those buildings in the polak khazar
    jewsrael. Hadn't been Russian, that Kiev would already be gone. As for instance.

    𝗙𝗶𝗿𝗲𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀_𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻_𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻_𝗼𝗻_𝗜𝘀𝗿𝗮𝗲𝗹
    https://bitchute.com/video/jp2Cz9dlBXzU

    be careful what you do in that shithole country known as gearmony. You
    inbreed have also a big mouth. And consume illegal substances on trains.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Franz Makhrov@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Fri Jun 20 14:39:32 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Donnerstag000019, 19.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb Siri Cruz:
    I can renounce my US citizenship. The US would not recognise that
    because I am still in the US and they can exercise their jurisdiction
    over me. If I first move to Bali, the US cannot do anything to me, so
    their opinion of legality is irrelevant.

    But in some cases emigration was allowed, but most likely not by
    teenagers.
    But in case of Einstein we had also the issue of WWI and whether or not
    it was possible to evade drafting by going to Italy.
    If it were illegal, than Einstein would have been a 'draft dodger' and
    would have been imprisoned once going back to Germany.

    your poing seems reasonable, the gypsy jew Einstine was stealing patents
    in return for degrees. Was a traitor fag to his country and his family.

    also, the gypsy jew smellensky, a khazar goy of khazaria, is shitting his
    pants now, seeing what happens to those buildings in the polak khazar
    jewsrael. Hadn't been Russian, that Kiev would already be gone. As for instance.

    𝗙𝗶𝗿𝗲𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀_𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻_𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻_𝗼𝗻_𝗜𝘀𝗿𝗮𝗲𝗹
    https://bitchute.com/video/jp2Cz9dlBXzU

    you have to be careful what you do in that shithole country known as
    gearmony. You assholes have also a big mouth. And consume illegal
    substances on trains.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From OrigInfoJunkie@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 20 12:01:11 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 6/20/2025 12:26 AM, Thomas Heger gelogen:
    Am Donnerstag000019, 19.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb Siri Cruz:

    Also unusual: Einstein denounced German citizenship without
    acquiring any other. This is illegal in Germany. I actually don't
    know, whether or not that was illegal in the former German
    Empire, too, but would guess that wasn't allowed then neither.

    I can renounce my US citizenship. The US would not recognise that because I am
    still in the US and they can exercise their jurisdiction over me. If I first >> move to Bali, the US cannot do anything to me, so their opinion of legality is
    irrelevant.

    Unless Germany was going to charge into Italy or Switzerland, what they
    decided was illegal was unenforceable.

    The concepts about citizenship were different in Germany (compared to the USA).

    At that time, Germans were born as subjects, not citizens.


    Actually the German empire was a monarchy and

    Actually, Germany was several monarchies and duchies at that time, you stupid fucking Lügner. Einstein was born a subject of the kingdom of Württemberg, part
    of the German empire. For six years beginning in 1895 he was stateless. He became a citizen of Switzerland in 1901 at age 21. This makes a complete joke of
    your lie that he was Swiss at birth. He became a German citizen/subject again in
    1914, this time as a subject of the kingdom of Prussia, without renouncing his Swiss citizenship.

    When you say you have "doubts" about this history of Einstein's citizenship, you're just bullshitting. You have no valid reason to have any such "doubts," you fucking Lügner.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From OrigInfoJunkie@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 20 12:00:16 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 6/20/2025 12:17 AM, Thomas Heger gelogen:
    Am Donnerstag000019, 19.06.2025 um 10:07 schrieb Siri Cruz:
    On 18/6/25 21:41, Gronk wrote:
    "Developments took place in several phases,
    but in the words of historian Mark Walker, it
    ultimately became "frozen at the laboratory
    level" with the "modest goal" to "build a
    nuclear reactor which could sustain a nuclear
    fission chain reaction for a significant amount

    Nuclear reactors need a device to slow down neutrons so that the chain
    reaction is sustains at a low power. Weapons do not slow down neutrons. They >> sustain the reaction at a high power that cannot be contained.

    One way to slow down neutrons is let them bounce off heavy water molecules. >> Another is bounce off carbon atoms in graphite. In 1943 graphite was
    contaminated with boron which removed neutrons altogether. So Germans decided
    to use heavy water which they became fixated on. They never could get enough >> so they never had any reactor or self-sustaining chain reaction. Fermi and >> Americans realised they could clean boron out of graphite. Fermi got the first
    reactor running in 1943. They built more reactors; they discoverred a new
    element in the reactor ash which led to breeder reactors and Plutonium as a >> fissile metal along with U235. Plutonium could be refined with chemistry.

    of time and to achieve the complete separation
    of at least tiny amounts of the uranium isotopes".

    All Uranium isotopes have the same chemistry so it requires very expensive >> methods depending on slightly different nucleus weights. It requires a lot of
    electricity, space, and machinery. Only the USA could afford this whilst
    fighting a war.

    The scholarly consensus is that it failed to
    achieve these goals, and that despite fears at

    Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just scholarly
    consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved Germany had no
    functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs.


    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them.

    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you fucking Lügner.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From OrigInfoJunkie@21:1/5 to Chris M. Thomasson on Fri Jun 20 12:40:48 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 6/20/2025 12:07 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
    On 6/20/2025 12:00 PM, OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
    On 6/20/2025 12:17 AM, Thomas Heger gelogen:
    Am Donnerstag000019, 19.06.2025 um 10:07 schrieb Siri Cruz:
    On 18/6/25 21:41, Gronk wrote:
    "Developments took place in several phases,
    but in the words of historian Mark Walker, it
    ultimately became "frozen at the laboratory
    level" with the "modest goal" to "build a
    nuclear reactor which could sustain a nuclear
    fission chain reaction for a significant amount

    Nuclear reactors need a device to slow down neutrons so that the chain >>>> reaction is sustains at a low power. Weapons do not slow down neutrons. They
    sustain the reaction at a high power that cannot be contained.

    One way to slow down neutrons is let them bounce off heavy water molecules.
    Another is bounce off carbon atoms in graphite. In 1943 graphite was
    contaminated with boron which removed neutrons altogether. So Germans
    decided to use heavy water which they became fixated on. They never could >>>> get enough so they never had any reactor or self-sustaining chain reaction.
    Fermi and Americans realised they could clean boron out of graphite. Fermi >>>> got the first reactor running in 1943. They built more reactors; they
    discoverred a new element in the reactor ash which led to breeder reactors >>>> and Plutonium as a fissile metal along with U235. Plutonium could be refined
    with chemistry.

    of time and to achieve the complete separation
    of at least tiny amounts of the uranium isotopes".

    All Uranium isotopes have the same chemistry so it requires very expensive >>>> methods depending on slightly different nucleus weights. It requires a lot >>>> of electricity, space, and machinery. Only the USA could afford this whilst
    fighting a war.

    The scholarly consensus is that it failed to
    achieve these goals, and that despite fears at

    Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just scholarly
    consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved Germany had no >>>> functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs.


    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them.

    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you fucking Lügner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one or two from
    North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.

    The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.


    Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes!


    Israel has made no military attack on North Korea. I doubt Israel could even undertake sabotage in North Korea. They did, however, attack a suspected reactor
    site in Syria that was believed to have North Korean assistance in its development.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruz@21:1/5 to Chris M. Thomasson on Fri Jun 20 15:13:06 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for
    them.

    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one,
    you fucking Lügner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
    one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o

    Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes!

    The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy
    sat and watched.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 21 09:13:24 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Freitag000020, 20.06.2025 um 21:01 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
    On 6/20/2025 12:26 AM, Thomas Heger gelogen:
    Am Donnerstag000019, 19.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb Siri Cruz:

    Also unusual: Einstein denounced German citizenship without
    acquiring any other. This is illegal in Germany. I actually don't
    know, whether or not that was illegal in the former German
    Empire, too, but would guess that wasn't allowed then neither.

    I can renounce my US citizenship. The US would not recognise that
    because I am still in the US and they can exercise their jurisdiction
    over me. If I first move to Bali, the US cannot do anything to me, so
    their opinion of legality is irrelevant.

    Unless Germany was going to charge into Italy or Switzerland, what
    they decided was illegal was unenforceable.

    The concepts about citizenship were different in Germany (compared to
    the USA).

    At that time, Germans were born as subjects, not citizens.


    Actually the German empire was a monarchy and

    Actually, Germany was several monarchies and duchies at that time, you
    stupid fucking Lügner. Einstein was born a subject of the kingdom of Württemberg, part of the German empire. For six years beginning in 1895
    he was stateless. He became a citizen of Switzerland in 1901 at age 21.
    This makes a complete joke of your lie that he was Swiss at birth. He
    became a German citizen/subject again in 1914, this time as a subject of
    the kingdom of Prussia, without renouncing his Swiss citizenship.


    The real name of the state wasn't 'Germany'.

    In German that nation was called 'Deutsches Reich'.

    'Reich' means 'Empire' in English and 'Deutsch' means 'German'.

    That German Empire was fused together of more than 1000 entities, from
    which only a few were large.

    The largest was actually Prussia, which was a kingdom at that time.

    But Prussia had no own citizenship later and after 1871 you simply
    became a German citizen (not 'Prussian').

    These single states like Bavaria and Wurtemberg had some life after the creation of that union and as far as I know, Bavaria and Wurtemberg kept
    own citizenship for at least some time.

    Bavaria had actually also an own army.

    But, more or less, Germany was regarded as a single entity with
    undivided citizenship.


    When you say you have "doubts" about this history of Einstein's
    citizenship, you're just bullshitting. You have no valid reason to have
    any such "doubts," you fucking Lügner.


    I actually had reasons and have already mentioned them.


    This is especially important, because if any of Einstein's stations in
    his CV ware actually fabricated, than everything else would be
    questionable, too.

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruz@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Sat Jun 21 00:50:50 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 21/6/25 0:22, Thomas Heger wrote:
    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis
    have actually built atomic bombs.

    If Call of Duty says so, it must be true.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 21 09:22:30 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Freitag000020, 20.06.2025 um 21:40 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
    ...
    The scholarly consensus is that it failed to
    achieve these goals, and that despite fears at

    Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just
    scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved
    Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs.


    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them.

    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you
    fucking Lügner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one or
    two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.

    The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.

    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
    actually built atomic bombs.

    But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not
    been born then.

    So, well, yes, maybe...

    ...possibly the Nazis had in fact no a-bombs.

    (possibly they had...)


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruz@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Sat Jun 21 00:49:13 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 21/6/25 0:13, Thomas Heger wrote:
    This is especially important, because if any of Einstein's
    stations in his CV ware actually fabricated, than everything else
    would be questionable, too.

    Because it would be impossible to put his wild ideas to the test.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From OrigInfoJunkie@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Sat Jun 21 09:19:20 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 6/21/2025 12:22 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Freitag000020, 20.06.2025 um 21:40 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
    ...
    The scholarly consensus is that it failed to
    achieve these goals, and that despite fears at

    Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just scholarly >>>>>> consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved Germany had no >>>>>> functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs.


    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them.

    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you fucking >>>> Lügner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one or two >>> from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.

    The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an atomic bomb.
    It's a lie. They did not.

    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have actually built atomic bombs.

    They did not.


    But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not been born
    then.

    So, well, yes, maybe...

    ...possibly the Nazis had in fact no a-bombs.

    (possibly they had...)
    They never built an atomic bomb. You're just fucking around, stupidly.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 24 12:09:08 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Samstag000021, 21.06.2025 um 09:50 schrieb Siri Cruz:
    On 21/6/25 0:22, Thomas Heger wrote:
    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis
    have actually built atomic bombs.

    If Call of Duty says so, it must be true.


    The Computer was just invented in the era of the Nazis (actually in
    Germany by Konrad Zuse).

    But the Nazi had (most likely) no video-games like 'Call of duty'.


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 24 12:14:28 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Samstag000021, 21.06.2025 um 18:19 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
    On 6/21/2025 12:22 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Freitag000020, 20.06.2025 um 21:40 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
    ...
    The scholarly consensus is that it failed to
    achieve these goals, and that despite fears at

    Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just
    scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved >>>>>>> Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs. >>>>>>>

    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them. >>>>>
    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you
    fucking Lügner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one
    or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.

    The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an
    atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.

    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
    actually built atomic bombs.

    They did not.

    Well, possibly you were correct.

    But how could you possibly know?


    Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold
    them to the USA.

    'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational' behavior,
    since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.

    (BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chine.bleu@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Tue Jun 24 03:25:37 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Samstag000021, 21.06.2025 um 09:50 schrieb Siri Cruz:
    On 21/6/25 0:22, Thomas Heger wrote:
    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis
    have actually built atomic bombs.

    If Call of Duty says so, it must be true.


    The Computer was just invented in the era of the Nazis (actually in
    Germany by Konrad Zuse).

    I know, unfortunately for him he was born in a country insane with hate.
    UK buried its first computer.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chine.bleu@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Tue Jun 24 03:28:00 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Well, possibly you were correct.

    But how could you possibly know?


    Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold
    them to the USA.

    'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational' behavior, since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.

    (BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)

    Now tell us how Germany made the first jet fighter.

    The Gloster Meteor does ot count.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to chine.bleu on Tue Jun 24 10:02:58 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    chine.bleu wrote:

    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Well, possibly you were correct.

    But how could you possibly know?


    Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold
    them to the USA.

    'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational' behavior, since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.

    (BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)

    Now tell us how Germany made the first jet fighter.

    Actually...Albert Einstein designed those fighter wsr planes for Germany...

    When it comes to bomb delivery.. Albert Einstein is an ...expert! (ask the U.S. Military)


    "A single bomb of this

    type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy

    the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However,

    such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by

    air." -- Albert Einstein
    https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first



    I wonder how heavy "such bombs" weighed in Einstein's mind at that time?

    If he was thinking more than 3 "such bombs", then yes...posibly "too heavy".


    You can imagine Albert Einstein in his living room talking with
    his 'friends' about how "too heavy" "such bombs" would weigh!


    EINSTEIN: "IT'S GOING TO WEIGH ONE THOUSAND FUCKING POUNDS FOR ONE FUCKING URANIUM BOMB, YOU
    GONNA NEED FIVE FUCKING URANIUM BOMBS TO BLOW UP FUCKING JAPAN. FUCKING PLANES IN THE U.S. CANNOT
    CARRY THAT MUCH WEIGHT!!!"


    "WE CAN GET A single bomb of this type, carried by boat and explode FUCKING NEW YORK CITY!!!"

    Einstein is da bomb!



    Zilard and Fermi ask: "What about Germany?"


    Einstein: "I NEVER said I wanted to kill Germans."


    Einstein: "IT'S THOSE FUCKING JAPS, I WANT THEM FUCKING DEAD!!!!"








    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From OrigInfoJunkie@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Wed Jun 25 09:41:04 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 6/24/2025 3:09 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Samstag000021, 21.06.2025 um 09:50 schrieb Siri Cruz:
    On 21/6/25 0:22, Thomas Heger wrote:
    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis
    have actually built atomic bombs.

    If Call of Duty says so, it must be true.


    The Computer was just invented in the era of the Nazis (actually in Germany by
    Konrad Zuse).

    No, you stupid fucking Lügner, the first computer was not invented in Germany.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chine.bleu@21:1/5 to OrigInfoJunkie on Wed Jun 25 09:47:47 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
    I lived in Germany for 18 months 40 years ago, and I never met a German
    as stupid and as big a Lügner as you. You seem to be working at being stupid, but your being a Lügner just shows bad character. I think it's
    the only thing at which you've succeeded in your worthless Leben.

    Wehraboos are joke on themselves.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From OrigInfoJunkie@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Wed Jun 25 09:40:45 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 6/24/2025 3:14 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Samstag000021, 21.06.2025 um 18:19 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
    On 6/21/2025 12:22 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Freitag000020, 20.06.2025 um 21:40 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
    ...
    The scholarly consensus is that it failed to
    achieve these goals, and that despite fears at

    Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just scholarly >>>>>>>> consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved Germany had no >>>>>>>> functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs.


    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them. >>>>>>
    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you fucking >>>>>> Lügner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one or two
    from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.

    The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an atomic >>>> bomb. It's a lie. They did not.

    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have actually
    built atomic bombs.

    They did not.

    Well, possibly you were correct.

    No, not merely "possibly" — I am correct. Nazi Germany never developed an atomic
    bomb.


    But how could you possibly know?

    We all know it, you stupid fucking Lügner.


    Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold them to the USA.

    Fuck off, you stupid fucking Lügner.

    I lived in Germany for 18 months 40 years ago, and I never met a German as stupid and as big a Lügner as you. You seem to be working at being stupid, but your being a Lügner just shows bad character. I think it's the only thing at which you've succeeded in your worthless Leben.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chine.bleu@21:1/5 to OrigInfoJunkie on Wed Jun 25 10:20:51 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 3:09 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Samstag000021, 21.06.2025 um 09:50 schrieb Siri Cruz:
    On 21/6/25 0:22, Thomas Heger wrote:
    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis
    have actually built atomic bombs.

    If Call of Duty says so, it must be true.


    The Computer was just invented in the era of the Nazis (actually in
    Germany by Konrad Zuse).

    No, you stupid fucking Lügner, the first computer was not invented in Germany.

    It was. Z1 was more electro-mechanical calculator. More versions were
    built with the Z3 being the first programmable computer.

    The US built the Eniac in 1945 was another programmable computer.

    UK made a number of electro-mechanical computing device for cipher
    breaking and the Colossus computer. It was kept secret and unknown for
    thirty years as UK ceded business computers to the USA.

    Zuse and the USA continued after the war.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to chine.bleu on Wed Jun 25 11:27:56 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    In sci.physics chine.bleu <[email protected]> wrote:
    OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 3:09 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Samstag000021, 21.06.2025 um 09:50 schrieb Siri Cruz:
    On 21/6/25 0:22, Thomas Heger wrote:
    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis
    have actually built atomic bombs.

    If Call of Duty says so, it must be true.


    The Computer was just invented in the era of the Nazis (actually in
    Germany by Konrad Zuse).

    No, you stupid fucking Lügner, the first computer was not invented in
    Germany.

    It was. Z1 was more electro-mechanical calculator. More versions were
    built with the Z3 being the first programmable computer.

    The US built the Eniac in 1945 was another programmable computer.

    UK made a number of electro-mechanical computing device for cipher
    breaking and the Colossus computer. It was kept secret and unknown for
    thirty years as UK ceded business computers to the USA.

    Zuse and the USA continued after the war.

    It depends on how you define "computer".

    If you include arithmatic mechanisms, then the first would be the abacus
    from circa 2700 BC.

    The Antikythera mechanism was an analog mechanical device from circa 200
    BC and was used to predict astronomical positions and eclipses.

    If you mean general purpose mechanical computer, that would be Charles Babbage's Difference Engine, designed in the 1820s.

    The Atanasoff–Berry computer (ABC) was the first automatic electronic
    digital computer, though it wasn't programmable and was more of an
    arithmetic logic unit, conceived in 1937.

    The Z3 was an electromechanical programmable, fully automatic digital
    computer circa 1941.

    The British Colossus was a set of computers and was the first
    programmable, electronic, digital computer, although it was programmed
    by switches and plugs.

    The ENIAC was similar to the Colossus and it was Turing-complete though
    still programmed by patch cables and switches.

    The Manchester Baby, circa 1948, was the first electronic stored-program computer designed as a testbed for random access memory. It was the first working machine to contain all the elements essential to a modern
    electronic digital computer.

    So if you define "computer" as fully electronic, programmable, digital, Turing-complete and containing electronic memory, the first was the
    Manchester Baby.


    --
    [email protected]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 27 07:39:51 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Dienstag000024, 24.06.2025 um 12:28 schrieb chine.bleu:
    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Well, possibly you were correct.

    But how could you possibly know?


    Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold
    them to the USA.

    'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational' behavior,
    since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.

    (BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)

    Now tell us how Germany made the first jet fighter.

    The Gloster Meteor does ot count.


    There existed a number of Jet-fighters in Germany at the end of WWII.

    But I certainly cannot tell you, how they were made, because I wasn't
    even born then.

    But you may have a look at this

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mwga3crerJc


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 27 08:04:48 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Mittwoch000025, 25.06.2025 um 18:41 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
    On 6/24/2025 3:09 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Samstag000021, 21.06.2025 um 09:50 schrieb Siri Cruz:
    On 21/6/25 0:22, Thomas Heger wrote:
    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis
    have actually built atomic bombs.

    If Call of Duty says so, it must be true.


    The Computer was just invented in the era of the Nazis (actually in
    Germany by Konrad Zuse).

    No, you stupid fucking Lügner, the first computer was not invented in Germany.

    Well, actually 'computers' were invented much earlier, like the ones by Leibnitz or Pascal:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascaline

    But the first thing programmable was build in Germany by Konrad Zuse and
    was called Z1.

    The western allies plundered German science after the war, however, and
    called Zuse's invention 'Von Neumann architecture'.

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Fri Jun 27 06:04:01 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    In sci.physics Thomas Heger <[email protected]> wrote:
    Am Dienstag000024, 24.06.2025 um 12:28 schrieb chine.bleu:
    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Well, possibly you were correct.

    But how could you possibly know?


    Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold
    them to the USA.

    'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational' behavior, >>> since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.

    (BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)

    Now tell us how Germany made the first jet fighter.

    The Gloster Meteor does ot count.


    There existed a number of Jet-fighters in Germany at the end of WWII.

    While there were many experimental jet fighters by the end of WWII, the
    only operational one was the Messerschmitt Me 262.

    So if by "first" you mean operational, then Germany made the first jet
    fighter.


    But I certainly cannot tell you, how they were made, because I wasn't
    even born then.

    You might try reading a book or two as the history of jet fighter
    development is well documented.


    But you may have a look at this

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mwga3crerJc


    TH

    --
    [email protected]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J Carlson@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 27 09:19:01 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 6/26/2025 11:04 PM, Thomas Heger gelogen:
    Am Mittwoch000025, 25.06.2025 um 18:41 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
    On 6/24/2025 3:09 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Samstag000021, 21.06.2025 um 09:50 schrieb Siri Cruz:
    On 21/6/25 0:22, Thomas Heger wrote:
    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis
    have actually built atomic bombs.

    If Call of Duty says so, it must be true.


    The Computer was just invented in the era of the Nazis (actually in Germany >>> by Konrad Zuse).

    No, you stupid fucking Lügner, the first computer was not invented in Germany.

    Well, actually 'computers' were invented much earlier, like the ones by Leibnitz
    or Pascal:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascaline
    We're talking about modern electronic computers, not mechanical computing machines.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From OrigInfoJunkie@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 27 09:18:13 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 6/26/2025 10:39 PM, Thomas Heger gelogen:
    Am Dienstag000024, 24.06.2025 um 12:28 schrieb chine.bleu:
    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Well, possibly you were correct.

    But how could you possibly know?


    Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold
    them to the USA.

    'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational' behavior, >>> since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.

    (BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)

    Now tell us how Germany made the first jet fighter.

    The Gloster Meteor does ot count.


    There existed a number of Jet-fighters in Germany at the end of WWII.
    There were *two* operational models of jet fighter in Germany at the end of WWII, the Me 262 and the Heinkel He 162. The latter was a piece of crap, made mostly of wood. The Me 262 was decent, but the collapsing Luftwaffe had a hard time keeping them in the air.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chine.bleu@21:1/5 to OrigInfoJunkie on Fri Jun 27 10:16:53 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
    On 6/26/2025 10:39 PM, Thomas Heger gelogen:
    Am Dienstag000024, 24.06.2025 um 12:28 schrieb chine.bleu:
    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Well, possibly you were correct.

    But how could you possibly know?


    Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold
    them to the USA.

    'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational'
    behavior,
    since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.

    (BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)

    Now tell us how Germany made the first jet fighter.

    The Gloster Meteor does ot count.


    There existed a number of Jet-fighters in Germany at the end of WWII.
    There were *two* operational models of jet fighter in Germany at the end
    of WWII, the Me 262 and the Heinkel He 162. The latter was a piece of
    crap, made mostly of wood. The Me 262 was decent, but the collapsing Luftwaffe had a hard time keeping them in the air.

    German jet engines lasted about ten hours before becoming scrap metal.
    British jet engines lasted much longer, German industry could not build replacement engines fast enough to keep jets in operation.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J Carlson@21:1/5 to chine.bleu on Fri Jun 27 11:38:56 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 6/27/2025 10:16 AM, chine.bleu wrote:
    OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
    On 6/26/2025 10:39 PM, Thomas Heger gelogen:
    Am Dienstag000024, 24.06.2025 um 12:28 schrieb chine.bleu:
    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Well, possibly you were correct.

    But how could you possibly know?


    Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold >>>>> them to the USA.

    'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational'
    behavior,
    since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.

    (BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)

    Now tell us how Germany made the first jet fighter.

    The Gloster Meteor does ot count.


    There existed a number of Jet-fighters in Germany at the end of WWII.
    There were *two* operational models of jet fighter in Germany at the end
    of WWII, the Me 262 and the Heinkel He 162. The latter was a piece of
    crap, made mostly of wood. The Me 262 was decent, but the collapsing
    Luftwaffe had a hard time keeping them in the air.

    German jet engines lasted about ten hours before becoming scrap metal.

    I vaguely remembered something about that. I did a Google search on "were jet engines for me 262 unreliable" and the Google AI Overview answer reads:

    Yes, the Junkers Jumo 004 engines powering the Me 262 were a significant
    source of unreliability during World War II. These early jet engines had a
    limited lifespan, typically requiring major overhauls after just 10-25 hours
    of operation. This unreliability, combined with shortages of strategic
    materials and fuel, hampered the Me 262's operational effectiveness.


    British jet engines lasted much longer, German industry could not build replacement engines fast enough to keep jets in operation.

    Sounds about right.

    Interesting that even as late as the 1940s, British inventors were still ahead of the U.S.



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chine.bleu@21:1/5 to J Carlson on Fri Jun 27 13:13:44 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    J Carlson wrote:
    I vaguely remembered something about that. I did a Google search on
    "were jet engines for me 262 unreliable" and the Google AI Overview
    answer reads:

    The problem is regions of jet engines are very hot and high pressures.
    The alloys in 1940s could not deal with.


    Yes, the Junkers Jumo 004 engines powering the Me 262 were a
    significant
    source of unreliability during World War II. These early jet engines
    had a
    limited lifespan, typically requiring major overhauls after just
    10-25 hours
    of operation. This unreliability, combined with shortages of strategic
    materials and fuel, hampered the Me 262's operational effectiveness.

    German jet engines are what called axial flow where turbine and
    compressor blades were stressed beyond their limits.

    British jet engines lasted much longer, German industry could not
    build replacement engines fast enough to keep jets in operation.

    Sounds about right.

    Britain used centrifugal flow which did not stress the metal as much.

    Interesting that even as late as the 1940s, British inventors were still ahead of the U.S.

    In the late 1940s and 1950s stronger alloys were discoverred that made
    strong blades. Everyone went axial flow since the engines could run a
    long time. The stronger alloys were not known earlier and some of the
    metals were widely available to UK or Germany. UK engines worked with
    that while German engines tr


    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 28 18:28:40 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Freitag000027, 27.06.2025 um 18:19 schrieb J Carlson:

    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis
    have actually built atomic bombs.

    If Call of Duty says so, it must be true.


    The Computer was just invented in the era of the Nazis (actually in
    Germany by Konrad Zuse).

    No, you stupid fucking Lügner, the first computer was not invented in
    Germany.

    Well, actually 'computers' were invented much earlier, like the ones
    by Leibnitz or Pascal:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascaline
    We're talking about modern electronic computers, not mechanical
    computing machines.

    The word 'computer' stems from the verb 'to compute'.

    This meant actually human beings in the time earlier than the invention
    of calculating machines.

    Early mechanical devices were in a way also 'computers', because the
    could compute.

    So, Zuse's Z1 was not the first computer, of course.

    But Zuse invented a system to make his machine freely programmable.

    THAT was his novelty.


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Leighton =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFer?=@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Sat Jun 28 16:37:16 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Sounds about right.

    Interesting that even as late as the 1940s, British inventors were
    still ahead of the U.S.

    This was changed significantly by 'operation paperclip'.

    In this operation the US forces roamed through Germany and captured
    every interesting scientist and brought them to the USA.

    They also plundered thousands of patents.

    thank you my friend. Finally someone awake. They also bombed you own
    taxpayer paid energy pipelines at the bottom of the sea. Then none of the
    your nomenclature is reacting ferociously. Which is absurd. Your state cooperating with the enemy and the terrorists.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 28 18:32:28 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Freitag000027, 27.06.2025 um 20:38 schrieb J Carlson:
    On 6/27/2025 10:16 AM, chine.bleu wrote:
    OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
    On 6/26/2025 10:39 PM, Thomas Heger gelogen:

    Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold >>>>>> them to the USA.

    'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational'
    behavior,
    since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.

    (BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)

    Now tell us how Germany made the first jet fighter.

    The Gloster Meteor does ot count.


    There existed a number of Jet-fighters in Germany at the end of WWII.
    There were *two* operational models of jet fighter in Germany at the end >>> of WWII, the Me 262 and the Heinkel He 162. The latter was a piece of
    crap, made mostly of wood. The Me 262 was decent, but the collapsing
    Luftwaffe had a hard time keeping them in the air.

    German jet engines lasted about ten hours before becoming scrap metal.

    I vaguely remembered something about that. I did a Google search on
    "were jet engines for me 262 unreliable" and the Google AI Overview
    answer reads:

       Yes, the Junkers Jumo 004 engines powering the Me 262 were a significant
       source of unreliability during World War II. These early jet engines had a
       limited lifespan, typically requiring major overhauls after just
    10-25 hours
       of operation. This unreliability, combined with shortages of strategic
       materials and fuel, hampered the Me 262's operational effectiveness.


    British jet engines lasted much longer, German industry could not
    build replacement engines fast enough to keep jets in operation.

    Sounds about right.

    Interesting that even as late as the 1940s, British inventors were still ahead of the U.S.

    This was changed significantly by 'operation paperclip'.

    In this operation the US forces roamed through Germany and captured
    every interesting scientist and brought them to the USA.

    They also plundered thousands of patents.

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chine.bleu@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Sat Jun 28 10:12:57 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:
    This was changed significantly by 'operation paperclip'.

    In this operation the US forces roamed through Germany and captured
    every interesting scientist and brought them to the USA.

    The first American jet engines (1942) were centrifugal flow based on the British engine which the UK shared. As hardier alloys were developed
    axial flow became the dominant.

    Bugger off wehraboo.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Sun Jul 13 22:25:07 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Dienstag000024, 24.06.2025 um 12:28 schrieb chine.bleu:
    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Well, possibly you were correct.

    But how could you possibly know?

    Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold
    them to the USA.

    'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational' behavior, >>> since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.

    (BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)

    Now tell us how Germany made the first jet fighter.

    The Gloster Meteor does ot count.

    There existed a number of Jet-fighters in Germany at the end of WWII.

    But I certainly cannot tell you, how they were made, because I wasn't
    even born then.

    Yes you can, you even provide a youtube link.

    But you may have a look at this

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mwga3crerJc

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Sun Jul 13 22:23:15 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Freitag000020, 20.06.2025 um 21:40 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
    The scholarly consensus is that it failed to
    achieve these goals, and that despite fears at

    Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just
    scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved
    Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs. >>>>>>
    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them.

    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you
    fucking Lügner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one
    or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.

    The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an
    atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.

    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
    actually built atomic bombs.

    But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not
    been born then.

    That's what history and historians are for.

    So, well, yes, maybe...

    ...possibly the Nazis had in fact no a-bombs.

    (possibly they had...)
    No. Not even close.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 14 08:35:03 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:

    Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just
    scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved >>>>>>> Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs. >>>>>>>
    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them. >>>>>
    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you
    fucking Lügner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one
    or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.

    The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an
    atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.

    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
    actually built atomic bombs.

    But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not
    been born then.

    That's what history and historians are for.


    Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because
    Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).

    So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 14 08:38:57 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:25 schrieb Gronk:
    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Dienstag000024, 24.06.2025 um 12:28 schrieb chine.bleu:
    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Well, possibly you were correct.

    But how could you possibly know?

    Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold
    them to the USA.

    'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational'
    behavior,
    since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.

    (BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)

    Now tell us how Germany made the first jet fighter.

    The Gloster Meteor does ot count.

    There existed a number of Jet-fighters in Germany at the end of WWII.

    But I certainly cannot tell you, how they were made, because I wasn't
    even born then.

    Yes you can, you even provide a youtube link.

    I'm a little insecure, what you try to say with that statement.

    Certainly you don't want to tell me, that all YouTube videos contain the
    truth.


    (That would be imho a really silly assumption.)


    But a few videos on YouTube do contain something else than lies.

    The problem is, that it is difficult to find out, which videos fall into
    that category.


    But you may have a look at this

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mwga3crerJc




    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chine.bleu@21:1/5 to Gronk on Mon Jul 14 04:01:59 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Gronk wrote:
    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Freitag000020, 20.06.2025 um 21:40 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
    The scholarly consensus is that it failed to
    achieve these goals, and that despite fears at

    Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just
    scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved >>>>>>> Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs. >>>>>>>
    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them. >>>>>
    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you
    fucking Lügner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one
    or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.

    The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an
    atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.

    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
    actually built atomic bombs.

    But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not
    been born then.

    That's what history and historians are for.

    So, well, yes, maybe...

    ...possibly the Nazis had in fact no a-bombs.

    (possibly they had...)
    No. Not even close.

    Sounds like a Wehraboo or worst a German neonazi.

    Chest thumping the ME262 and dismissal of the Gloster Meteor was telling.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Tue Jul 15 01:50:18 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:

    Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:

    Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just
    scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes
    proved Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and >>>>>>>> no bombs.

    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for
    them.

    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you
    fucking Lügner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
    one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.

    The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an
    atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.

    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
    actually built atomic bombs.

    But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not
    been born then.

    That's what history and historians are for.


    Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because
    Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).

    So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).

    TH



    Churchill was so confident of reelection
    in 1945 that he didn't bother campaigning, he
    never got over that rebuke.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 15 20:23:34 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 22:58 schrieb William Hyde:
    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:

    Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just
    scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes
    proved Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and >>>>>>>>> no bombs.

    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>>>> them.

    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you >>>>>>> fucking Lügner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
    one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.

    The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an
    atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.

    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
    actually built atomic bombs.

    But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not
    been born then.

    That's what history and historians are for.


    Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because
    Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).


    The phrase "History is written by the victors" predates Churchill's
    birth by decades.

    Churchill is quoted as saying it in a movie, which apparently is seen as
    a reliable source by some. To reject historians as a source and accept
    movies which are avowedly fictional is well into crackpot territory.

    Indeed it was Goring who said:

    “Der Sieger wird immer der Richter und der Besiegte stets der Angeklagte sein,”

    Only after he lost, though.

    Churchill did frequently joke that judgement should be left to history, "particularly as I intend to write that history myself", a reference to
    his extensive output as a writer.

    Churchill was actually a world-class writer and wrote a novel about a
    massaker, in which he participated.

    (the so called 'Battle of Omdurman')

    The British conducted a number of warcrimes, like killing all the
    wounded enemies.

    Churchill wrote 'The River war' about this and won actually a nobel
    price for his advanture novel.

    Churchills next adventures brought him to South Africa, where he helped
    to run the worlds first concentration camps (together with war hero
    Kitchener again).

    ...


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Wed Jul 16 10:03:36 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity
    XPost: alt.binaries.pictures.scenic

    Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> wrote:

    Thomas Heger <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:

    Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:

    Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just
    scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes
    proved Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and >>>>>>>> no bombs.

    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>>> them.

    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you >>>>>> fucking LÃπgner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
    one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.

    The LÃπgner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an
    atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.

    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
    actually built atomic bombs.

    But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not
    been born then.

    That's what history and historians are for.


    Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because
    Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).

    So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).

    TH



    Churchill was so confident of reelection
    in 1945 that he didn't bother campaigning, he
    never got over that rebuke.

    Churchill was already beginning to dement during WWII.
    Being badly alcholic didn't help either.
    Fortunately whe had Roosevelt to bring things to a happy ending.

    Jan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to Brian Ehni on Thu Jul 17 22:16:03 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity
    XPost: alt.binaries.pictures.scenic

    Brian Ehni <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Jul 16, 2025, J. J. Lodder wrote
    (in article<1rfi9gn.1imbhyt13uwdmmN%[email protected]>):

    Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> wrote:

    Thomas Heger <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:

    Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:

    Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved Germany had no functionning reactors,
    no enrichment, and no bombs.
    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American
    searched for them.

    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed
    one, you fucking LÃπgner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of
    purchased one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.

    The LÃπgner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.

    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have actually built atomic bombs.

    But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not
    been born then.

    That's what history and historians are for.

    Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).

    So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).

    TH


    Churchill was so confident of reelection
    in 1945 that he didn't bother campaigning, he
    never got over that rebuke.

    Churchill was already beginning to dement during WWII.
    Being badly alcholic didn't help either.
    Fortunately whe had Roosevelt to bring things to a happy ending.

    Jan

    As if FDR didn't have his own problems...He sat idly by while Churchill and Stalin divvied up Europe into spheres of influence.

    If it had been up to Churchill there would have been nothing to divide.
    All of Europe would have been for Stalin.
    It was Roosevelt who forced the Normandy invasion.
    We Europeans have been lucky. For a while the Americans (read FDR)
    were so fed up with British hesitations and delaying tactics
    that they seriously considered giving up on Europe.
    (and doing Japan first)

    You may want to have a look at
    Nigel Hamilton, Commander In Chief: FDR's Battle with Churchill, 1943
    (FDR at War Book 2)
    There is also a good review of it at Amazon.

    Jan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chine.bleu@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Thu Jul 17 14:22:16 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity
    XPost: alt.binaries.pictures.scenic

    [email protected] (J. J. Lodder) wrote:
    Brian Ehni <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Jul 16, 2025, J. J. Lodder wrote
    (in article<1rfi9gn.1imbhyt13uwdmmN%[email protected]>):

    Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> wrote:

    Thomas Heger <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:

    Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:

    Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not >>>>>>>>>>>> just scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our >>>>>>>>>>>> own eyes proved Germany had no functionning reactors,
    no enrichment, and no bombs.
    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American
    searched for them.

    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed
    one, you fucking LÃπgner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of
    purchased one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.

    The LÃπgner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed >>>>>>>> an atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.

    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have >>>>>>> actually built atomic bombs.

    But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not >>>>>>> been born then.

    That's what history and historians are for.

    Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because
    Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).

    So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).

    TH


    Churchill was so confident of reelection
    in 1945 that he didn't bother campaigning, he
    never got over that rebuke.

    Churchill was already beginning to dement during WWII.
    Being badly alcholic didn't help either.
    Fortunately whe had Roosevelt to bring things to a happy ending.

    Jan

    As if FDR didn't have his own problems...He sat idly by while Churchill and >> Stalin divvied up Europe into spheres of influence.

    If it had been up to Churchill there would have been nothing to divide.
    All of Europe would have been for Stalin.
    It was Roosevelt who forced the Normandy invasion.
    We Europeans have been lucky. For a while the Americans (read FDR)
    were so fed up with British hesitations and delaying tactics
    that they seriously considered giving up on Europe.
    (and doing Japan first)

    You may want to have a look at
    Nigel Hamilton, Commander In Chief: FDR's Battle with Churchill, 1943
    (FDR at War Book 2)
    There is also a good review of it at Amazon.

    By the end of war, Truman knew he could nuke Russian cities one by one.
    Nothing else could stop the USSR continuing to the English Channel.
    Despite the constant frothing by the hired guns on both sides, peace
    broke out. Nobody wants a USA/Russia war. The guns of that August went
    silent.

    And with the test ban in place, nobody can be sure their nuclear weapons
    are still weapons.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Wo=C5=BAniak?=@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Fri Jul 18 08:00:37 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity
    XPost: alt.binaries.pictures.scenic

    On 7/17/2025 10:16 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    Brian Ehni <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Jul 16, 2025, J. J. Lodder wrote
    (in article<1rfi9gn.1imbhyt13uwdmmN%[email protected]>):

    Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> wrote:

    Thomas Heger <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:

    Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:

    Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not >>>>>>>>>>>> just scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our >>>>>>>>>>>> own eyes proved Germany had no functionning reactors,
    no enrichment, and no bombs.
    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American
    searched for them.

    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed
    one, you fucking LÃπgner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of
    purchased one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.

    The LÃπgner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed >>>>>>>> an atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.

    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have >>>>>>> actually built atomic bombs.

    But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not >>>>>>> been born then.

    That's what history and historians are for.

    Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because
    Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).

    So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).

    TH


    Churchill was so confident of reelection
    in 1945 that he didn't bother campaigning, he
    never got over that rebuke.

    Churchill was already beginning to dement during WWII.
    Being badly alcholic didn't help either.
    Fortunately whe had Roosevelt to bring things to a happy ending.

    Jan

    As if FDR didn't have his own problems...He sat idly by while Churchill and >> Stalin divvied up Europe into spheres of influence.

    If it had been up to Churchill there would have been nothing to divide.
    All of Europe would have been for Stalin.
    It was Roosevelt who forced the Normandy invasion

    For kiddies - Churchill's alternative were Balkans.
    Unacceptable for Stalin, obviously.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Jul 19 22:40:59 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity
    XPost: alt.binaries.pictures.scenic

    Maciej Wo?niak <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/17/2025 10:16 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    Brian Ehni <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Jul 16, 2025, J. J. Lodder wrote
    (in article<1rfi9gn.1imbhyt13uwdmmN%[email protected]>):

    Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> wrote:

    Thomas Heger <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:

    Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:

    Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not >>>>>>>>>>>> just scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our >>>>>>>>>>>> own eyes proved Germany had no functionning reactors, >>>>>>>>>>>> no enrichment, and no bombs.
    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American
    searched for them.

    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed
    one, you fucking LÃπgner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of
    purchased one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. >>>>>>>>
    The LÃπgner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed >>>>>>>> an atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.

    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have >>>>>>> actually built atomic bombs.

    But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not >>>>>>> been born then.

    That's what history and historians are for.

    Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because
    Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).

    So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).

    TH


    Churchill was so confident of reelection
    in 1945 that he didn't bother campaigning, he
    never got over that rebuke.

    Churchill was already beginning to dement during WWII.
    Being badly alcholic didn't help either.
    Fortunately whe had Roosevelt to bring things to a happy ending.

    Jan

    As if FDR didn't have his own problems...He sat idly by while Churchill and
    Stalin divvied up Europe into spheres of influence.

    If it had been up to Churchill there would have been nothing to divide.
    All of Europe would have been for Stalin.
    It was Roosevelt who forced the Normandy invasion

    For kiddies - Churchill's alternative were Balkans.

    Yes, incredibly stupid. The real motivation was fear of a real invasion.
    The Balkans by themselves are bad enough for making real progress.
    Even supposing the Allies could have made some headway there
    it would have been practically impossible to cross the Alps.

    Roosevelt otoh saw what needed to be done,
    an invasion in Normandy,
    and from there it is all nearly flat terrain
    all the way to Berlin.
    He fought very hard to get Churchill to see it his way.
    Fortunately for us he won.

    Unacceptable for Stalin, obviously.

    Obviously not, Stalin would have loved it very much.
    Let the Americans and the British do useless things in the Balkans,
    (who wants Albania?)
    while he would have all of Europe north of the Alps to himself.

    Jan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kurtiss Dogadaev@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Sat Jul 19 22:55:53 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    J. J. Lodder wrote:

    Maciej Wo?niak <[email protected]> wrote:
    For kiddies - Churchill's alternative were Balkans.

    Yes, incredibly stupid. The real motivation was fear of a real invasion.
    The Balkans by themselves are bad enough for making real progress.
    Even supposing the Allies could have made some headway there it would
    have been practically impossible to cross the Alps.

    you stupid polaks. I like cheap wine and cheap whisky. If not mistaken old
    time they made cheap whisky from shit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chine.bleu@21:1/5 to Governor Swill on Sat Jul 19 18:15:19 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Governor Swill wrote:
    You may want to have a look at
    Nigel Hamilton, Commander In Chief: FDR's Battle with Churchill, 1943
    (FDR at War Book 2)
    There is also a good review of it at Amazon.
    The entire lead up to the war was a mess of UK and European mistakes.

    UK and France. Hitler marched into the Rhineland and violated
    Versailles. They did not need to wait for Poland to start war; that was sufficient cause. France actually marched in but got the sniffles and
    turned back. When Hitler got away with it, the German military accepted
    as their dictator.

    Churchill all but begged FDR for help. As for delays, FDR was the

    The USA's important contribution was as the 'arsenal of democracy',
    sending food and weapons to UK, USSR, China as Lend-Lease. And USN and
    USCG fought German U-boats up to about the mid-Atlantic.

    master of them, never committing American troops or resources until
    others had done the heavy lifting. Stalin begged them to open a
    western front but FDR and Churchill both knew that getting in a rush
    would lead to failure. They took their time, they prepared carefully
    and allowed Russia to take the brunt of Hitler's wrath and weaken his
    western front before attacking in France.

    UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They
    tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany
    would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not
    until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The
    losses of the USSR are solely his fault.

    That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did
    not help.

    I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the
    political level it is all Stalin.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Governor Swill on Mon Jul 21 09:02:05 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Governor Swill wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:

    UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They
    tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany
    would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not
    until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The
    losses of the USSR are solely his fault.

    That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did >not help.

    I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the
    political level it is all Stalin.

    Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool.

    yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war.

    All Soviets are commies. The only good commie is a dead commie.

    In war, you're suppose to kill all the civilians.

    In Japan, it was the civilians that were the target, not japanese
    soldiers.

    In Gaza, 99.9 percent dead are ...civilians.


    Millions of Soviets is a ...good thinbg.


    Ukraine? well I hope you get the all the pretty girls out first...


    i'm starting an internationsal dating servies. i need the product.

    I'll advertise on the drudgereport! Beautiful Ukraine Girls!! obident, complient and submissive...


    well i don't know why they still call it the Drudgereport, ...It looks
    like The TrumpReport judging by all the headlines!


    (i'm pretty sure thedrudgereport is on Trump's list)


    BURRYTHOSEMOTHEFUCKERS!



    Trump gots a message for his bodies-to-be-buried:

    https://x.com/i/status/1947069589835100194







    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Chris M. Thomasson on Mon Jul 21 23:06:58 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Governor Swill wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:

    UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They
    tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany
    would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not
    until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The
    losses of the USSR are solely his fault.

    That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did >>> not help.

    I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the
    political level it is all Stalin.

    Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool.

    yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war.
    [...]

    War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it
    destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as
    in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter
    what? Cough/...

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit
    killed by an asteroid.


    NEVER.






    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From x@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Wed Jul 23 11:24:21 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 7/21/25 23:06, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Governor Swill wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:

    UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They >>>>> tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany >>>>> would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not
    until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The
    losses of the USSR are solely his fault.

    That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did >>>>> not help.

    I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the
    political level it is all Stalin.

    Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool.

    yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war.
    [...]

    War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it
    destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as
    in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter
    what? Cough/...

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit
    killed by an asteroid.


    NEVER.

    I think that you are not an AI programmed to change the subject
    at this point. Anyway there was a short article in Sky and
    Telescope about 20 or so years ago about a boy in Africa who was
    struck by a meteorite at the time who lived after being struck
    by it. I am not going to bother to try to dig it up for you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chine.bleu@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 23 13:03:27 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    x wrote:
    the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit
    killed by an asteroid.


    NEVER.

    I think that you are not an AI programmed to change the subject
    at this point. Anyway there was a short article in Sky and
    Telescope about 20 or so years ago about a boy in Africa who was
    struck by a meteorite at the time who lived after being struck
    by it. I am not going to bother to try to dig it up for you.


    Asteroid hits are extremely rare. I doubt we have been around long
    enough. Meteors hit every year making a bad interaction much more
    probable. So let us confuse everything because we are too far gone for
    rational exchange.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to Chris M. Thomasson on Wed Jul 23 22:03:28 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    Chris M. Thomasson <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Governor Swill wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:

    UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They >>>>> tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany >>>>> would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not >>>>> until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The >>>>> losses of the USSR are solely his fault.

    That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did
    not help.

    I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the
    political level it is all Stalin.

    Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool.

    yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war.
    [...]

    War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it
    destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as
    in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter
    what? Cough/...

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit killed by an asteroid.


    NEVER.

    How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
    result of its impact?

    The Tunguska event is supposed to have killed one human,
    at 30 km away. (blown 12 meter up into a tree)
    It no doubt killed large numbers of animals.
    Such an event in an inhabited region could easily kill thousands,
    if not millions of humans.
    The yield has been estimated at about 10 Megaton equivalent,

    Jan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Reiniel =?iso-8859-2?b?pmyxemFr?=@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Wed Jul 23 22:14:01 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    J. J. Lodder wrote:

    How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
    result of its impact?

    The Tunguska event is supposed to have killed one human,
    at 30 km away. (blown 12 meter up into a tree)
    It no doubt killed large numbers of animals.
    Such an event in an inhabited region could easily kill thousands,
    if not millions of humans.
    The yield has been estimated at about 10 Megaton equivalent,

    your wife is a man. Or you didn't pay attention.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From x@21:1/5 to chine.bleu on Wed Jul 23 14:46:01 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 7/23/25 13:03, chine.bleu wrote:
    x wrote:
    the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit
    killed by an asteroid.


    NEVER.

    I think that you are not an AI programmed to change the subject
    at this point.  Anyway there was a short article in Sky and
    Telescope about 20 or so years ago about a boy in Africa who was
    struck by a meteorite at the time who lived after being struck
    by it.  I am not going to bother to try to dig it up for you.


    Asteroid hits are extremely rare. I doubt we have been around long
    enough. Meteors hit every year making a bad interaction much more
    probable. So let us confuse everything because we are too far gone for rational exchange.

    When asteroids or comets fall to the Earth, they fragment into a
    lot of pieces. They also have regular meteor showers each year
    as a byproduct of past comets.

    I am not sure if I also read another article some while back
    about how a small number of car dents happen because of meteorites.

    My guess is that they found the meteorite fragments, and then compared
    them with times of meteor showers. I am thinking the boy in Africa
    was indirectly struck. In other words, the meteorite hit a tree and
    then hit the boy. I am thinking that either the boy was not seriously
    injured or not injured at all. That was a while back. I would guess
    that the boy is a young adult by now. I do not remember which African
    country that was.




    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From x@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Wed Jul 23 15:46:17 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 7/23/25 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Governor Swill wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:

    UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They >>>>>>> tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany >>>>>>> would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not >>>>>>> until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The >>>>>>> losses of the USSR are solely his fault.

    That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did
    not help.

    I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the
    political level it is all Stalin.

    Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool.

    yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war.
    [...]

    War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it
    destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as >>>> in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter
    what? Cough/...

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit
    killed by an asteroid.


    NEVER.

    How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
    result of its impact?

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!


    In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
    has EVER been killed by an asteroid!


    Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...

    When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????

    There could be various meanings of the word 'hit' but
    I am thinking that some types of dust do drift or blow
    to the ground every day that are supposed to be derived from
    meteor fragments or micrometeorites.>
    That would tend to mean today and every day.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Chris M. Thomasson on Wed Jul 23 15:37:22 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Governor Swill wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:

    UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They >>>>> tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany >>>>> would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not >>>>> until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The >>>>> losses of the USSR are solely his fault.

    That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did
    not help.

    I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the
    political level it is all Stalin.

    Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool.

    yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war.
    [...]

    War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it
    destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as
    in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter
    what? Cough/...

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit killed by an asteroid.


    NEVER.

    How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
    result of its impact?

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!


    In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
    has EVER been killed by an asteroid!


    Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...

    When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????


    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chine.bleu@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 23 16:31:13 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    x wrote:
    On 7/23/25 13:03, chine.bleu wrote:
    x wrote:

    My guess is that they found the meteorite fragments, and then compared
    them with times of meteor showers. I am thinking the boy in Africa
    was indirectly struck. In other words, the meteorite hit a tree and
    then hit the boy. I am thinking that either the boy was not seriously injured or not injured at all. That was a while back. I would guess
    that the boy is a young adult by now. I do not remember which African country that was.

    They go outside in Antarctica after a snowstorm where meteors are easily
    seen. Oddly they have not reported any asteroid. One station reported a
    flying saucer, but they went off the air and have not been heard of since.

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSMET>

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Thu Jul 24 13:00:57 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    x <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/23/25 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
    [-]
    How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
    result of its impact?

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!


    In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
    has EVER been killed by an asteroid!


    Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...

    When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????

    There could be various meanings of the word 'hit' but
    I am thinking that some types of dust do drift or blow
    to the ground every day that are supposed to be derived from
    meteor fragments or micrometeorites.>
    That would tend to mean today and every day.

    A common convention is to call things smaller than 1 meter meteoroids,
    and bigger things asteroids. [1]
    (you may prefer another convention of course)

    With this convention asteroid impacts are not rare events,

    Jan

    [1] This is about the size that is needed to reach the ground.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe Baiburski@21:1/5 to Chris M. Thomasson on Thu Jul 24 21:01:48 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/24/2025 4:00 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    With this convention asteroid impacts are not rare events,

    Jan

    [1] This is about the size that is needed to reach the ground.

    Did massive comet impacts bring water to our little speck (planet),
    earth in our little galaxy in cosmic time?

    finally a sober answer in relativity. Worth to be remembered.

    𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁_𝗱𝗼_𝘆𝗼𝘂_𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸_𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀_𝗮𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿_𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻𝘀
    https://b%69%74%63%68%75%74e.com/vi%64%65o/aIENdUMfmSWD

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to Chris M. Thomasson on Fri Jul 25 22:12:27 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    Chris M. Thomasson <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/24/2025 4:00 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    x <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/23/25 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
    [-]
    How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the >>>> result of its impact?

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!


    In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
    has EVER been killed by an asteroid!


    Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...

    When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????

    There could be various meanings of the word 'hit' but
    I am thinking that some types of dust do drift or blow
    to the ground every day that are supposed to be derived from
    meteor fragments or micrometeorites.>
    That would tend to mean today and every day.

    A common convention is to call things smaller than 1 meter meteoroids,
    and bigger things asteroids. [1]
    (you may prefer another convention of course)

    With this convention asteroid impacts are not rare events,

    Jan

    [1] This is about the size that is needed to reach the ground.

    Did massive comet impacts bring water to our little speck (planet),
    earth in our little galaxy in cosmic time?

    Quite possible, but there really is no need to postulate that.
    The early solar system was cold enough to have ice around here,

    Jan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to Governor Swill on Fri Jul 25 22:12:27 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 22:41:58 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/20/2025 3:13 PM, Siri Cruz wrote:
    On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for
    them.

    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one,
    you fucking L�gner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
    one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o

    Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes!

    The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy sat and
    watched.


    Underwater drone navy mixed with ballistic anti ship missiles and
    anti-ship drone mine arrays?

    LOL!

    The cruiser was being launched and the engineers flubbed the set up.
    Instead of the ship sliding smoothly into the water and floating, it
    hit too fast, listed and capsized.

    Brand new ship. Sunk itself at launch.

    I don't think we need to fear much from people who can't even launch a
    boat properly.

    You don't want to take risks with nukes, do you?

    Jan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blaine Baidakov@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Fri Jul 25 20:46:32 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    J. J. Lodder wrote:

    Did massive comet impacts bring water to our little speck (planet),
    earth in our little galaxy in cosmic time?

    Quite possible, but there really is no need to postulate that. The early solar system was cold enough to have ice around here,

    not entirely true. Ice dilates in space, hence ice contains an atmosphere,
    gas or air, which is required for ice to exists. When ice melts, a gas is released.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Emmet Dubatolov@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Fri Jul 25 23:26:03 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    J. J. Lodder wrote:

    I don't think we need to fear much from people who can't even launch a
    boat properly.

    You don't want to take risks with nukes, do you?

    good poing; this earth is deepen corrupted beyond repair. As I can see, it
    will result in a total destruction; there are no alternatives. You can't
    repair genocide and the indifference at it, for instance.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Fri Jul 25 19:35:10 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 14:11:48 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/25/2025 1:12 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/24/2025 4:00 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    x <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/23/25 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
    [-]
    How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the >>>>>>> result of its impact?

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!


    In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person >>>>>> has EVER been killed by an asteroid!


    Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte... >>>>>>
    When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????

    There could be various meanings of the word 'hit' but
    I am thinking that some types of dust do drift or blow
    to the ground every day that are supposed to be derived from
    meteor fragments or micrometeorites.>
    That would tend to mean today and every day.

    A common convention is to call things smaller than 1 meter meteoroids, >>>> and bigger things asteroids. [1]
    (you may prefer another convention of course)

    With this convention asteroid impacts are not rare events,

    Jan

    [1] This is about the size that is needed to reach the ground.

    Did massive comet impacts bring water to our little speck (planet),
    earth in our little galaxy in cosmic time?

    Quite possible, but there really is no need to postulate that.
    The early solar system was cold enough to have ice around here,

    So, are you saying that water was already present on Earth in the "early >days", or did comet impacts help it as well?


    you mean comets carry buckets of water from ...Mars?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Fri Jul 25 19:38:18 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 20:46:32 -0000 (UTC), Blaine Baidakov
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    J. J. Lodder wrote:

    Did massive comet impacts bring water to our little speck (planet),
    earth in our little galaxy in cosmic time?

    Quite possible, but there really is no need to postulate that. The early
    solar system was cold enough to have ice around here,

    not entirely true. Ice dilates in space, hence ice contains an atmosphere, >gas or air, which is required for ice to exists. When ice melts, a gas is >released.


    Does dry ice gets dry does it emit a gas?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Fri Jul 25 19:33:32 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:37:22 -0700, The Starmaker
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Governor Swill wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:

    UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They >> >>>>> tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany >> >>>>> would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not
    until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The
    losses of the USSR are solely his fault.

    That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did
    not help.

    I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the
    political level it is all Stalin.

    Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool.

    yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war.
    [...]

    War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it
    destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as >> >> in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter
    what? Cough/...

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit
    killed by an asteroid.


    NEVER.

    How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
    result of its impact?

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!


    In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
    has EVER been killed by an asteroid!


    Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...

    When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????


    All Chris can find is BEFORE The Ice Age!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Lodder on Fri Jul 25 19:42:58 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 22:12:27 +0200, [email protected] (J. J.
    Lodder) wrote:

    Chris M. Thomasson <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/24/2025 4:00 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    x <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/23/25 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
    [-]
    How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the >> >>>> result of its impact?

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!


    In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
    has EVER been killed by an asteroid!


    Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...

    When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????

    There could be various meanings of the word 'hit' but
    I am thinking that some types of dust do drift or blow
    to the ground every day that are supposed to be derived from
    meteor fragments or micrometeorites.>
    That would tend to mean today and every day.

    A common convention is to call things smaller than 1 meter meteoroids,
    and bigger things asteroids. [1]
    (you may prefer another convention of course)

    With this convention asteroid impacts are not rare events,

    Jan

    [1] This is about the size that is needed to reach the ground.

    Did massive comet impacts bring water to our little speck (planet),
    earth in our little galaxy in cosmic time?

    Quite possible, but there really is no need to postulate that.
    The early solar system was cold enough to have ice around here,

    Jan


    the ice age was caused by the earth bambaroo from the sun.

    then it was not ...'just right',

    now it's just right.

    It was what killed all the dinosaurs.

    It was too hot, then too cold.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Fri Jul 25 19:46:26 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:51:26 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/24/2025 4:00 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    x <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/23/25 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
    [-]
    How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the >>>>> result of its impact?

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!


    In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
    has EVER been killed by an asteroid!


    Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...

    When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????

    There could be various meanings of the word 'hit' but
    I am thinking that some types of dust do drift or blow
    to the ground every day that are supposed to be derived from
    meteor fragments or micrometeorites.>
    That would tend to mean today and every day.

    A common convention is to call things smaller than 1 meter meteoroids,
    and bigger things asteroids. [1]
    (you may prefer another convention of course)

    With this convention asteroid impacts are not rare events,

    Jan

    [1] This is about the size that is needed to reach the ground.

    Did massive comet impacts bring water to our little speck (planet),
    earth in our little galaxy in cosmic time?

    I never heard of a ..."massive comet", ...

    what size it? Like the Empire State Building????

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Lodder on Fri Jul 25 19:49:32 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:00:57 +0200, [email protected] (J. J.
    Lodder) wrote:

    x <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/23/25 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
    [-]
    How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
    result of its impact?

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!


    In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
    has EVER been killed by an asteroid!


    Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...

    When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????

    There could be various meanings of the word 'hit' but
    I am thinking that some types of dust do drift or blow
    to the ground every day that are supposed to be derived from
    meteor fragments or micrometeorites.>
    That would tend to mean today and every day.

    A common convention is to call things smaller than 1 meter meteoroids,
    and bigger things asteroids. [1]
    (you may prefer another convention of course)

    With this convention asteroid impacts are not rare events,

    Jan

    [1] This is about the size that is needed to reach the ground.


    There is absolutuely 'no science' in what you just said. And it don't
    make no sense at all.

    Can you translate what you just said in English?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Fri Jul 25 21:17:30 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:46:17 -0700, x <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/23/25 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Governor Swill wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:

    UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They >>>>>>>> tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany >>>>>>>> would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not >>>>>>>> until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The >>>>>>>> losses of the USSR are solely his fault.

    That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did
    not help.

    I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the >>>>>>>> political level it is all Stalin.

    Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool. >>>>>>
    yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war. >>>>> [...]

    War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it >>>>> destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as >>>>> in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter
    what? Cough/...

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit >>>> killed by an asteroid.


    NEVER.

    How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
    result of its impact?

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!


    In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
    has EVER been killed by an asteroid!


    Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...

    When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????

    There could be various meanings of the word 'hit' but
    I am thinking that some types of dust do drift or blow
    to the ground every day that are supposed to be derived from
    meteor fragments or micrometeorites.>
    That would tend to mean today and every day.

    By 'hit' I mean, if an asteroid hitsyou on the head and kills you..

    or if an asteroid hits an elephant on the head and lills it..

    Where else does a ateroid have to hit you to kill you?

    If a rock falls from the sky and hits you...

    But the TRUTH is, an asteroid NEVER hit the Earth....

    the action of one asteroid forcibly into contact with the earth and
    all it's inhabits...hit!

    Never Happen.

    Dats NASA Science Fiction to exort grant money using FEAR.

    Ask the Mafia what does EXTORTION means.

    I FUCKING HIT YOU ON THE FUCKING HEAD IF YOU DON'T GIME ME YOURFUCKING
    MONEY!

    Hit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Jul 26 11:57:53 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 00:45:37 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/25/2025 7:38 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 20:46:32 -0000 (UTC), Blaine Baidakov
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    J. J. Lodder wrote:

    Did massive comet impacts bring water to our little speck (planet),
    earth in our little galaxy in cosmic time?

    Quite possible, but there really is no need to postulate that. The early >>>> solar system was cold enough to have ice around here,

    not entirely true. Ice dilates in space, hence ice contains an atmosphere, >>> gas or air, which is required for ice to exists. When ice melts, a gas is >>> released.


    Does dry ice gets dry does it emit a gas?


    What happens to dry ice rapidly releasing gas in a sealed contained >environment?

    Typical, scientist asking bomb questions. Influenced by einsteins...

    every kid knows you put dry ice in a Coke Cola bottle and seal it...

    then drop it on Japan.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Jul 26 11:58:52 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 00:47:19 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/25/2025 7:38 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 20:46:32 -0000 (UTC), Blaine Baidakov
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    J. J. Lodder wrote:

    Did massive comet impacts bring water to our little speck (planet),
    earth in our little galaxy in cosmic time?

    Quite possible, but there really is no need to postulate that. The early >>>> solar system was cold enough to have ice around here,

    not entirely true. Ice dilates in space, hence ice contains an atmosphere, >>> gas or air, which is required for ice to exists. When ice melts, a gas is >>> released.


    Does dry ice gets dry does it emit a gas?

    Wear the proper protection. Put dry ice in a plastic bottle. Add some
    water then close the top, run away. What might happen?


    a condom?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Jul 26 12:02:54 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 00:42:38 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/25/2025 1:12 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 22:41:58 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/20/2025 3:13 PM, Siri Cruz wrote:
    On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>>>> them.

    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one,
    you fucking L�gner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
    one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o

    Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes!

    The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy sat and >>>>> watched.


    Underwater drone navy mixed with ballistic anti ship missiles and
    anti-ship drone mine arrays?

    LOL!

    The cruiser was being launched and the engineers flubbed the set up.
    Instead of the ship sliding smoothly into the water and floating, it
    hit too fast, listed and capsized.

    Brand new ship. Sunk itself at launch.

    I don't think we need to fear much from people who can't even launch a
    boat properly.

    You don't want to take risks with nukes, do you?

    Good point. If they get into the crazy hands, well... They say we need
    to nuke to perhaps help bring about the great event from some religious >prophecy or something? Yikes!


    Crazy hands like Israel or the united states?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Jul 26 12:01:30 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 00:44:08 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/25/2025 7:33 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:37:22 -0700, The Starmaker
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Governor Swill wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:

    UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They >>>>>>>>> tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany >>>>>>>>> would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not >>>>>>>>> until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The >>>>>>>>> losses of the USSR are solely his fault.

    That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did
    not help.

    I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the >>>>>>>>> political level it is all Stalin.

    Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool. >>>>>>>
    yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war. >>>>>> [...]

    War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it >>>>>> destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as >>>>>> in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter >>>>>> what? Cough/...

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit >>>>> killed by an asteroid.


    NEVER.

    How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
    result of its impact?

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!


    In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
    has EVER been killed by an asteroid!


    Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...

    When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????


    All Chris can find is BEFORE The Ice Age!


    You seem to act like it never occurred before.

    It? are you refering to the ice age or Nasa's asteroids?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From x@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Sat Jul 26 13:53:28 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    On 7/25/25 13:12, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 22:41:58 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/20/2025 3:13 PM, Siri Cruz wrote:
    On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for
    them.

    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one,
    you fucking Lügner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
    one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o

    Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes!

    The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy
    sat and
    watched.


    Underwater drone navy mixed with ballistic anti ship missiles and
    anti-ship drone mine arrays?

    LOL!

    The cruiser was being launched and the engineers flubbed the set up.
    Instead of the ship sliding smoothly into the water and floating, it
    hit too fast, listed and capsized.

    Brand new ship. Sunk itself at launch.

    I don't think we need to fear much from people who can't even launch a
    boat properly.

    You don't want to take risks with nukes, do you?

    Jan

    Isn't ANY government having nukes a risk? Why trust
    any of them?

    There are a bunch of countries that have nuclear power
    but undergo NNPT verification and accounting because they,
    do not want to incinerate millions of women and children
    with nuclear weapons.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From x@21:1/5 to Chris M. Thomasson on Sat Jul 26 14:43:28 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    On 7/26/25 00:42, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
    On 7/25/2025 1:12 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 22:41:58 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/20/2025 3:13 PM, Siri Cruz wrote:
    On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>>>> them.

    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one,
    you fucking Lügner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
    one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o

    Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes!

    The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy sat
    and
    watched.


    Underwater drone navy mixed with ballistic anti ship missiles and
    anti-ship drone mine arrays?

    LOL!

    The cruiser was being launched and the engineers flubbed the set up.
    Instead of the ship sliding smoothly into the water and floating, it
    hit too fast, listed and capsized.

    Brand new ship.  Sunk itself at launch.

    I don't think we need to fear much from people who can't even launch a
    boat properly.

    You don't want to take risks with nukes, do you?

    Good point. If they get into the crazy hands, well... They say we need
    to nuke to perhaps help bring about the great event from some religious prophecy or something? Yikes!

    This is devoid of theology.

    With summum bonum and summum malum definitions of deity that
    would generally not be a good thing (it would tend toward
    summum malum).

    The grim reaper is grim and billions of people do regularly
    progress to degeneration and death, but being able to
    resurrect into an afterlife may be something different from
    various forms of destruction either great or small.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to Chris M. Thomasson on Sun Jul 27 10:22:41 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    Chris M. Thomasson <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/25/2025 1:12 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 22:41:58 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/20/2025 3:13 PM, Siri Cruz wrote:
    On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>>> them.

    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one,
    you fucking L�gner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
    one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o

    Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes!

    The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy sat and >>>> watched.


    Underwater drone navy mixed with ballistic anti ship missiles and
    anti-ship drone mine arrays?

    LOL!

    The cruiser was being launched and the engineers flubbed the set up.
    Instead of the ship sliding smoothly into the water and floating, it
    hit too fast, listed and capsized.

    Brand new ship. Sunk itself at launch.

    I don't think we need to fear much from people who can't even launch a
    boat properly.

    You don't want to take risks with nukes, do you?

    Good point. If they get into the crazy hands, well... They say we need
    to nuke to perhaps help bring about the great event from some religious prophecy or something? Yikes!

    Any hand wanting to hold nukes is crazy, by definition,

    Jan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Chris M. Thomasson on Sun Jul 27 13:00:45 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 7/26/25 18:29, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
    On 7/26/2025 12:01 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 00:44:08 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/25/2025 7:33 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:37:22 -0700, The Starmaker
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Governor Swill wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:

    UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about
    Barbarossa. They
    tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy >>>>>>>>>>> Germany
    would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It >>>>>>>>>>> was not
    until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke >>>>>>>>>>> up. The
    losses of the USSR are solely his fault.

    That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the >>>>>>>>>>> invasion did
    not help.

    I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the >>>>>>>>>>> political level it is all Stalin.

    Quite correct.  Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a >>>>>>>>>> fool.

    yous people still till to this day doen't seem to
    understand ...war.
    [...]

    War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while...
    Before it
    destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the >>>>>>>> point as
    in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter >>>>>>>> what? Cough/...

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever
    been hit
    killed by an asteroid.


    NEVER.

    How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the >>>>>> result of its impact?

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!


    In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person >>>>> has EVER been killed by an asteroid!


    Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte... >>>>>
    When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????


    All Chris can find is BEFORE The Ice Age!


    You seem to act like it never occurred before.

    It? are you refering to the ice age or Nasa's asteroids?

    Have large asteroids and/or comets hit he earth before? Ice ages and
    warming periods just means that radical climate change is normal even if humans are not artificially accelerating it now.

    Today's rate of climate change is the 2nd fastest known to mankind.

    The fastest one was 66 million years ago, namely the Yucatan's Chicxulub
    meteor impact. It ended the Cretaceous Period, the entire Mesozoic Era.
    Its the primary cause of the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) extinction
    event, which led to the extinction of 76% of all plant and animal species.

    FYI, this also means that contemporary rate of change is faster than all
    known Ice Ages & warming periods. By how much? At least 10x faster.

    The ramifications of this isn't that the Earth won't survive.
    It will, but will just be radically changed.

    The concern for humans is if we as a species will survive, and if we do,
    with how much socio-economic damage & civilization collapse.
    Sooo....are ya feeling lucky?

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to -hh on Sun Jul 27 17:33:54 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    -hh <[email protected]> wrote in news:1065lvt$2iep0$[email protected]:

    On 7/26/25 18:29, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
    On 7/26/2025 12:01 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 00:44:08 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/25/2025 7:33 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:37:22 -0700, The Starmaker
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Governor Swill wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:

    UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about
    Barbarossa. They
    tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his
    fantasy Germany
    would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It >>>>>>>>>>>> was not
    until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke >>>>>>>>>>>> up. The
    losses of the USSR are solely his fault.

    That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the >>>>>>>>>>>> invasion did
    not help.

    I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on >>>>>>>>>>>> the political level it is all Stalin.

    Quite correct.  Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as >>>>>>>>>>> a fool.

    yous people still till to this day doen't seem to
    understand ...war.
    [...]

    War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while...
    Before it
    destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the >>>>>>>>> point as
    in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no >>>>>>>>> matter what? Cough/...

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons.. >>>>>>>>
    the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever
    been hit
    killed by an asteroid.


    NEVER.

    How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things
    from the result of its impact?

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!


    In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or
    person has EVER been killed by an asteroid!


    Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your
    forte...

    When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????


    All Chris can find is BEFORE The Ice Age!


    You seem to act like it never occurred before.

    It? are you refering to the ice age or Nasa's asteroids?

    Have large asteroids and/or comets hit he earth before? Ice ages and
    warming periods just means that radical climate change is normal even
    if humans are not artificially accelerating it now.

    Today's rate of climate change is the 2nd fastest known to mankind.

    The fastest one was 66 million years ago, namely the Yucatan's
    Chicxulub meteor impact. It ended the Cretaceous Period, the entire
    Mesozoic Era. Its the primary cause of the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) extinction event, which led to the extinction of 76% of all plant and
    animal species.

    FYI, this also means that contemporary rate of change is faster than
    all known Ice Ages & warming periods. By how much? At least 10x
    faster.


    The Youger Dryas event is also thought to
    have been caused by an asteroid but the crater
    hasn't been found yet.




    The ramifications of this isn't that the Earth won't survive.
    It will, but will just be radically changed.

    The concern for humans is if we as a species will survive, and if we
    do, with how much socio-economic damage & civilization collapse.
    Sooo....are ya feeling lucky?

    -hh


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chine.bleu@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Sun Jul 27 11:06:38 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Mitchell Holman wrote:
    The Youger Dryas event is also thought to
    have been caused by an asteroid but the crater
    hasn't been found yet.


    I think I found it.

    <https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2752735>

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sun Jul 27 11:40:21 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 2025-07-23 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Governor Swill wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:

    UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They >>>>>>> tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany >>>>>>> would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not >>>>>>> until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The >>>>>>> losses of the USSR are solely his fault.

    That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did
    not help.

    I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the
    political level it is all Stalin.

    Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool.

    yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war.
    [...]

    War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it
    destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as >>>> in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter
    what? Cough/...

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit
    killed by an asteroid.


    NEVER.

    How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
    result of its impact?

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!

    Lots of asteroids have fallen on the Earth.

    But once an asteroid enters Earth's atmosphere, we start calling them
    "meteors" (if they burn up before hitting the ground) or "meteorites"
    (when they're large enough not to burn up completely and hit the ground).



    In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
    has EVER been killed by an asteroid!

    The dinosaurs were wiped out by an asteroid hitting the area of the
    Earth now known as the Yucatan Peninsula.

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicxulub_crater>





    Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...

    When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????
    Most recently? And large (ish)?

    'The Chelyabinsk Meteor (2013): This is the most significant known
    meteorite event in modern times to cause numerous injuries. The asteroid
    was estimated to be about 20 meters (66 feet) in diameter and exploded
    in an airburst over Chelyabinsk, Russia, releasing energy equivalent to
    about 500 kilotons of TNT (about 30 times the Hiroshima bomb). While it
    didn't create a crater, the airburst caused widespread damage and
    shattered windows, injuring around 1,500 people.'

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sun Jul 27 13:39:45 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 15:26:36 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/25/2025 9:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:46:17 -0700, x <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/23/25 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Governor Swill wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:

    UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They >>>>>>>>>> tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany
    would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not >>>>>>>>>> until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The >>>>>>>>>> losses of the USSR are solely his fault.

    That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did
    not help.

    I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the >>>>>>>>>> political level it is all Stalin.

    Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool. >>>>>>>>
    yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war. >>>>>>> [...]

    War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it >>>>>>> destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as >>>>>>> in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter >>>>>>> what? Cough/...

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit >>>>>> killed by an asteroid.


    NEVER.

    How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the >>>>> result of its impact?

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!


    In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
    has EVER been killed by an asteroid!


    Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...

    When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????

    There could be various meanings of the word 'hit' but
    I am thinking that some types of dust do drift or blow
    to the ground every day that are supposed to be derived from
    meteor fragments or micrometeorites.>
    That would tend to mean today and every day.

    By 'hit' I mean, if an asteroid hitsyou on the head and kills you..

    or if an asteroid hits an elephant on the head and lills it..

    Where else does a ateroid have to hit you to kill you?

    If a rock falls from the sky and hits you...

    But the TRUTH is, an asteroid NEVER hit the Earth....

    the action of one asteroid forcibly into contact with the earth and
    all it's inhabits...hit!

    Never Happen.

    Dats NASA Science Fiction to exort grant money using FEAR.

    Ask the Mafia what does EXTORTION means.

    I FUCKING HIT YOU ON THE FUCKING HEAD IF YOU DON'T GIME ME YOURFUCKING
    MONEY!

    Hit.




    Sigh. An asteroid hits say, 50 miles away and kills you. Is that a hit?

    Hit???? I already explained an asteroid NEVER hit the earth, or
    landed, or impacted or Touched the earth.

    Is there a piece of an asteriod in some science musem on Earth?

    A sample?

    maybe on ebay?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chine.bleu@21:1/5 to Chris M. Thomasson on Sun Jul 27 14:33:41 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    Hit???? I already explained an asteroid NEVER hit the earth, or
    landed, or impacted or Touched the earth.

    Breaking up in the atmosphere doesn't mean it didn't hit... it just
    means it hit in pieces. Fragments still reach the ground, craters still
    form, and the energy still impacts Earth. Whether it comes down whole or
    in chunks, it hit?


    Earth was hit by space rocks and continues to be. Which kind of space
    rock is an asteroid?

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From squalk@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Mon Jul 28 00:05:42 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 15:26:36 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/25/2025 9:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:46:17 -0700, x <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/23/25 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Governor Swill wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:

    UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They
    tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany
    would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not >>>>>>>>>>> until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The >>>>>>>>>>> losses of the USSR are solely his fault.

    That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did
    not help.

    I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the >>>>>>>>>>> political level it is all Stalin.

    Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool. >>>>>>>>>
    yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war. >>>>>>>> [...]

    War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it >>>>>>>> destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as
    in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter >>>>>>>> what? Cough/...

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit >>>>>>> killed by an asteroid.


    NEVER.

    How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the >>>>>> result of its impact?

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!


    In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person >>>>> has EVER been killed by an asteroid!


    Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte... >>>>>
    When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????

    There could be various meanings of the word 'hit' but
    I am thinking that some types of dust do drift or blow
    to the ground every day that are supposed to be derived from
    meteor fragments or micrometeorites.>
    That would tend to mean today and every day.

    By 'hit' I mean, if an asteroid hitsyou on the head and kills you..

    or if an asteroid hits an elephant on the head and lills it..

    Where else does a ateroid have to hit you to kill you?

    If a rock falls from the sky and hits you...

    But the TRUTH is, an asteroid NEVER hit the Earth....

    the action of one asteroid forcibly into contact with the earth and
    all it's inhabits...hit!

    Never Happen.

    Dats NASA Science Fiction to exort grant money using FEAR.

    Ask the Mafia what does EXTORTION means.

    I FUCKING HIT YOU ON THE FUCKING HEAD IF YOU DON'T GIME ME YOURFUCKING
    MONEY!

    Hit.




    Sigh. An asteroid hits say, 50 miles away and kills you. Is that a hit?

    Hit???? I already explained an asteroid NEVER hit the earth, or
    landed, or impacted or Touched the earth.

    Is there a piece of an asteriod in some science musem on Earth?

    A sample?

    maybe on ebay?

    ------------------------------

    Fire and Brimstone?


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to chine.bleu on Sun Jul 27 17:04:25 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 2025-07-27 14:33, chine.bleu wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    Hit???? I already explained an asteroid NEVER hit the earth, or
    landed, or impacted or Touched the earth.

    Breaking up in the atmosphere doesn't mean it didn't hit... it just
    means it hit in pieces. Fragments still reach the ground, craters still
    form, and the energy still impacts Earth. Whether it comes down whole or
    in chunks, it hit?


    Earth was hit by space rocks and continues to be. Which kind of space
    rock is an asteroid?


    What do you even think you mean?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sun Jul 27 17:03:56 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    On 2025-07-27 13:39, The Starmaker wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 15:26:36 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/25/2025 9:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:46:17 -0700, x <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/23/25 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Governor Swill wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:

    UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They
    tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany
    would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not >>>>>>>>>>> until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The >>>>>>>>>>> losses of the USSR are solely his fault.

    That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did
    not help.

    I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the >>>>>>>>>>> political level it is all Stalin.

    Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool. >>>>>>>>>
    yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war. >>>>>>>> [...]

    War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it >>>>>>>> destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as
    in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter >>>>>>>> what? Cough/...

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit >>>>>>> killed by an asteroid.


    NEVER.

    How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the >>>>>> result of its impact?

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!


    In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person >>>>> has EVER been killed by an asteroid!


    Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte... >>>>>
    When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????

    There could be various meanings of the word 'hit' but
    I am thinking that some types of dust do drift or blow
    to the ground every day that are supposed to be derived from
    meteor fragments or micrometeorites.>
    That would tend to mean today and every day.

    By 'hit' I mean, if an asteroid hitsyou on the head and kills you..

    or if an asteroid hits an elephant on the head and lills it..

    Where else does a ateroid have to hit you to kill you?

    If a rock falls from the sky and hits you...

    But the TRUTH is, an asteroid NEVER hit the Earth....

    the action of one asteroid forcibly into contact with the earth and
    all it's inhabits...hit!

    Never Happen.

    Dats NASA Science Fiction to exort grant money using FEAR.

    Ask the Mafia what does EXTORTION means.

    I FUCKING HIT YOU ON THE FUCKING HEAD IF YOU DON'T GIME ME YOURFUCKING
    MONEY!

    Hit.




    Sigh. An asteroid hits say, 50 miles away and kills you. Is that a hit?

    Hit???? I already explained an asteroid NEVER hit the earth, or
    landed, or impacted or Touched the earth.

    And you're wrong.


    Is there a piece of an asteriod in some science musem on Earth?

    Yup.

    Lots.


    A sample?

    You bet.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Sun Jul 27 23:34:20 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:
    Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just
    scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes
    proved Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and >>>>>>>> no bombs.

    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them. >>>>>>
    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you
    fucking Lügner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one
    or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.

    The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an
    atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.

    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
    actually built atomic bombs.

    But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not
    been born then.

    That's what history and historians are for.

    Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because

    Huh? Churchill paid EVERY historian in the world?

    Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).

    https://slate.com/culture/2019/11/history-is-written-by-the-victors-quote-origin.html

    So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).

    What about the histories written by non British authors?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Sun Jul 27 23:35:41 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:25 schrieb Gronk:
    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Dienstag000024, 24.06.2025 um 12:28 schrieb chine.bleu:
    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Well, possibly you were correct.

    But how could you possibly know?

    Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold >>>>> them to the USA.

    'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational'
    behavior,
    since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.

    (BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)

    Now tell us how Germany made the first jet fighter.

    The Gloster Meteor does ot count.

    There existed a number of Jet-fighters in Germany at the end of WWII.

    But I certainly cannot tell you, how they were made, because I wasn't
    even born then.

    Yes you can, you even provide a youtube link.

    I'm a little insecure, what you try to say with that statement.

    It's the link YOU posted.

    Certainly you don't want to tell me, that all YouTube videos contain the truth.

    Why did you post the link?

    (That would be imho a really silly assumption.)

    But a few videos on YouTube do contain something else than lies.

    The problem is, that it is difficult to find out, which videos fall into
    that category.

    You wrote this:

    But you may have a look at this

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mwga3crerJc

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 27 23:38:42 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    x wrote:
    On 7/21/25 23:06, The Starmaker wrote:

    the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit
    killed by an asteroid.

    NEVER.

    I think that you are not an AI programmed to change the subject
    at this point.  Anyway there was a short article in Sky and
    Telescope about 20 or so years ago about a boy in Africa who was
    struck by a meteorite at the time who lived after being struck
    by it.  I am not going to bother to try to dig it up for you.

    Only one documented one, apparently.

    https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/only-person-ever-hit-meteorite-real-trouble-began-later-180961238/
    Only one person in recorded history has ever been directly hit by a
    meteorite.

    Ann Hodges, 34, was napping under quilts on her
    couch in Sylacauga, Alabama, on November 30, 1954,
    when a nine-pound meteorite came through the
    ceiling and bounced off a radio before hitting
    her in the thigh.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chine.bleu@21:1/5 to Gronk on Mon Jul 28 01:47:50 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Gronk wrote:
    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:
    Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just
    scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes
    proved Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and >>>>>>>>> no bombs.

    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>>>> them.

    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you >>>>>>> fucking Lügner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
    one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.

    The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an
    atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.

    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
    actually built atomic bombs.

    But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not
    been born then.

    That's what history and historians are for.

    Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because

    Huh? Churchill paid EVERY historian in the world?

    Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).

    https://slate.com/culture/2019/11/history-is-written-by-the-victors-quote-origin.html


    So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).

    What about the histories written by non British authors?


    Rejected.

    <https://ww2f.com/threads/controversy-of-german-generals-memoirs.51233/#google_vignette>

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 28 20:43:41 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Montag000028, 28.07.2025 um 07:34 schrieb Gronk:
    ...
    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
    actually built atomic bombs.

    But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not
    been born then.

    That's what history and historians are for.

    Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because

    Huh? Churchill paid EVERY historian in the world?

    Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).

    https://slate.com/culture/2019/11/history-is-written-by-the-victors- quote-origin.html

    So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).

    What about the histories written by non British authors?


    Well, it wasn't not mainly 'British', what would make someone a member
    of the club, but being member of the club.

    Other 'wannabe' bestseller authors were sent to the GULAG, if the
    content of their books wasn't in the interest of the victors.

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 28 20:38:54 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Sonntag000027, 27.07.2025 um 20:40 schrieb Alan:
    On 2025-07-23 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
    Governor Swill wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:

    UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. >>>>>>>> They
    tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy
    Germany
    would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not >>>>>>>> until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The >>>>>>>> losses of the USSR are solely his fault.

    That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the
    invasion did
    not help.

    I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the >>>>>>>> political level it is all Stalin.

    Quite correct.  Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool. >>>>>>
    yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war. >>>>> [...]

    War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it >>>>> destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the
    point as
    in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter
    what? Cough/...

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit >>>> killed by an asteroid.


    NEVER.

    How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
    result of its impact?

    I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..

    NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!

    Lots of asteroids have fallen on the Earth.

    But once an asteroid enters Earth's atmosphere, we start calling them "meteors" (if they burn up before hitting the ground) or
    "meteorites" (when they're large enough not to burn up completely and
    hit the ground).



    In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
    has EVER been killed by an asteroid!

    The dinosaurs were wiped out by an asteroid hitting the area of the
    Earth now known as the Yucatan Peninsula.

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicxulub_crater>



    The dinosaurs were not 'wiped out'.

    The remains of the class of dinosaurs still live today and are called
    'birds'.

    What we call 'extintion' is actually the phenomenon, that very big
    dinosaurs (like e.g. T-Rex) have vanished.

    But it could actually be possible, that some offspring of the T-Rex
    lives still doday, though a little smaller in size and possibly with
    feathers.

    The reason for the extiction of the 'king-size' dinosaurs ist imho
    'Growing Earth'.

    This is so, because in the time of T-Rex the Earth was much smaller
    than today and had therefore much smaller gravity.

    This allowed all kinds of species to become extremely large.

    Later their weigth had disadvantages and so dinossaures are today
    outnumbered by much smaller beasts.

    But a few could have eventually survived.

    ...


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to chine.bleu on Sat Aug 2 23:47:17 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity

    chine.bleu wrote:
    Gronk wrote:
    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:
    Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just >>>>>>>>>> scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes >>>>>>>>>> proved Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and >>>>>>>>>> no bombs.

    sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>>>>> them.

    They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you >>>>>>>> fucking Lügner.

    Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
    one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.

    The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an
    atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.

    There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
    actually built atomic bombs.

    But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not >>>>> been born then.

    That's what history and historians are for.

    Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because

    Huh? Churchill paid EVERY historian in the world?

    Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).

    https://slate.com/culture/2019/11/history-is-written-by-the-victors-quote-origin.html



    So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).

    What about the histories written by non British authors?


    Rejected.

    <https://ww2f.com/threads/controversy-of-german-generals-memoirs.51233/#google_vignette>

    But translated by British authors?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)