Albert Einstein was the director, the producer and the screenwriter of the movie entitled "The Day The Earth Stood Still" 1951.
Of course Albert Einstein used a ghostwriter (which in those day that is what the 'communists' writers did)
Here is a link to the movie script:
https://www.dailyscript.com/scripts/the_day_the_earth_stood_still.html
Here is the full free movie:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xh8P4MIaZBA
https://archive.org/details/The.Day.The.Earth.Stood.Still1951
First , where did the Albert Einstein get the idea of the title of the movie "The Day The Earth Stood Still" ????
Since Albert Einstein is the designer and architect of 'The Atomic Bomb', and launched The Manhattan Project,
Albert Einstein got the idea from an incident mentioned in the newspapers at his time:
"In support of this there are stories of the experiences of automobile drivers in the vicinity of Los Alamos.
According to these their radios and motors stopped suddenly at the same instant and after 15 or 20 minutes suddenly began to operate as usual."
https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2013/09/20/worst-manhattan-project-leaks/ https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/1944-Cleveland-Press-Forbidden-City.pdf
KLAATU
(after a moment,
quietly)
You see -- the electricity's been
neutralized -- all over the world.
The impact of this calm, quiet statement is shattering. Helen
stares at him awe-struck. Then she speaks numbly, almost
inaudibly.
HELEN
Bobby was telling the truth -- wasn't
he?
Klaatu stares at her evenly, as we--
DISSOLVE TO:
MED. SHOT - STREET
All vehicular traffic in the street is at a dead stop.
Automobiles, busses, trolley cars -- all are stalled. Drivers
and passengers are climbing out of the vehicles in utter
bewilderment. Except for the people, it is as though the
street had been frozen in motion.
The Starmaker wrote:
Albert Einstein was the director, the producer and the screenwriter of the movie entitled "The Day The Earth Stood Still" 1951.
Of course Albert Einstein used a ghostwriter (which in those day that is what the 'communists' writers did)
Here is a link to the movie script:
https://www.dailyscript.com/scripts/the_day_the_earth_stood_still.html
Here is the full free movie:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xh8P4MIaZBA
https://archive.org/details/The.Day.The.Earth.Stood.Still1951
First , where did the Albert Einstein get the idea of the title of the movie "The Day The Earth Stood Still" ????
Since Albert Einstein is the designer and architect of 'The Atomic Bomb', and launched The Manhattan Project,
Albert Einstein got the idea from an incident mentioned in the newspapers at his time:
"In support of this there are stories of the experiences of automobile drivers in the vicinity of Los Alamos.
According to these their radios and motors stopped suddenly at the same instant and after 15 or 20 minutes suddenly began to operate as usual."
https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2013/09/20/worst-manhattan-project-leaks/ https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/1944-Cleveland-Press-Forbidden-City.pdf
KLAATU
(after a moment,
quietly)
You see -- the electricity's been
neutralized -- all over the world.
The impact of this calm, quiet statement is shattering. Helen
stares at him awe-struck. Then she speaks numbly, almost
inaudibly.
HELEN
Bobby was telling the truth -- wasn't
he?
Klaatu stares at her evenly, as we--
DISSOLVE TO:
MED. SHOT - STREET
All vehicular traffic in the street is at a dead stop.
Automobiles, busses, trolley cars -- all are stalled. Drivers
and passengers are climbing out of the vehicles in utter
bewilderment. Except for the people, it is as though the
street had been frozen in motion.
Albert Einstein speaks through two characters, KLAATU and Proffesor
Bernhart
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
Albert Einstein was the director, the producer and the screenwriter of the movie entitled "The Day The Earth Stood Still" 1951.
Of course Albert Einstein used a ghostwriter (which in those day that is what the 'communists' writers did)
Here is a link to the movie script:
https://www.dailyscript.com/scripts/the_day_the_earth_stood_still.html
Here is the full free movie:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xh8P4MIaZBA
https://archive.org/details/The.Day.The.Earth.Stood.Still1951
First , where did the Albert Einstein get the idea of the title of the movie "The Day The Earth Stood Still" ????
Since Albert Einstein is the designer and architect of 'The Atomic Bomb', and launched The Manhattan Project,
Albert Einstein got the idea from an incident mentioned in the newspapers at his time:
"In support of this there are stories of the experiences of automobile drivers in the vicinity of Los Alamos.
According to these their radios and motors stopped suddenly at the same instant and after 15 or 20 minutes suddenly began to operate as usual."
https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2013/09/20/worst-manhattan-project-leaks/ https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/1944-Cleveland-Press-Forbidden-City.pdf
KLAATU
(after a moment,
quietly)
You see -- the electricity's been
neutralized -- all over the world.
The impact of this calm, quiet statement is shattering. Helen
stares at him awe-struck. Then she speaks numbly, almost
inaudibly.
HELEN
Bobby was telling the truth -- wasn't
he?
Klaatu stares at her evenly, as we--
DISSOLVE TO:
MED. SHOT - STREET
All vehicular traffic in the street is at a dead stop.
Automobiles, busses, trolley cars -- all are stalled. Drivers
and passengers are climbing out of the vehicles in utter
bewilderment. Except for the people, it is as though the
street had been frozen in motion.
Albert Einstein speaks through two characters, KLAATU and Proffesor Bernhart
Second, what about "Klaatu barada nikto"? Where did that come from??
Everyone in the media already asked the 'listed' scriptwriter the question...and he has no answer for them!
Of course he has no answer...he didn't come up with it. You would have to ask Albert Einstein. He came up with it!
Professor Jacob Barnhardt, world-famous scientist
and Nobel Prize winner
Here are the links to Albert Einstein:
Professor
Jacob Barnhardt (Jacob is a Hebrew name)
Barnhardt ( Barnhardt is a German name)
Albert Einstein is Jewish and from Germany.
world-famous scientist (in the 50's that would be Einstein)
and Nobel Prize winner (Albert Einstein was a Nobel Prize winner)
and this is just the beginninng of the list! (besides that it's based on Albert Einstein,
the real Professor Bernhart, with that crazy hairdo)
"Klaatu barada nikto"????
Easy, it comes from Albert Einstein language...German!!!!
KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language.
"Klaatu barada nikto"????
Easy, it comes from Albert Einstein language...German!!!!
KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language.
I have read, that this sentence means:
God will not destroy the Earth (possibly: this time?).
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
Albert Einstein was the director, the producer and the screenwriter of the movie entitled "The Day The Earth Stood Still" 1951.
Of course Albert Einstein used a ghostwriter (which in those day that is what the 'communists' writers did)
Here is a link to the movie script:
https://www.dailyscript.com/scripts/the_day_the_earth_stood_still.html
Here is the full free movie:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xh8P4MIaZBA
https://archive.org/details/The.Day.The.Earth.Stood.Still1951
First , where did the Albert Einstein get the idea of the title of the movie "The Day The Earth Stood Still" ????
Since Albert Einstein is the designer and architect of 'The Atomic Bomb', and launched The Manhattan Project,
Albert Einstein got the idea from an incident mentioned in the newspapers at his time:
"In support of this there are stories of the experiences of automobile drivers in the vicinity of Los Alamos.
According to these their radios and motors stopped suddenly at the same instant and after 15 or 20 minutes suddenly began to operate as usual."
https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2013/09/20/worst-manhattan-project-leaks/
https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/1944-Cleveland-Press-Forbidden-City.pdf
KLAATU
(after a moment,
quietly)
You see -- the electricity's been
neutralized -- all over the world.
The impact of this calm, quiet statement is shattering. Helen
stares at him awe-struck. Then she speaks numbly, almost
inaudibly.
HELEN
Bobby was telling the truth -- wasn't
he?
Klaatu stares at her evenly, as we--
DISSOLVE TO:
MED. SHOT - STREET
All vehicular traffic in the street is at a dead stop.
Automobiles, busses, trolley cars -- all are stalled. Drivers
and passengers are climbing out of the vehicles in utter
bewilderment. Except for the people, it is as though the
street had been frozen in motion.
Albert Einstein speaks through two characters, KLAATU and Proffesor Bernhart
Second, what about "Klaatu barada nikto"? Where did that come from??
Everyone in the media already asked the 'listed' scriptwriter the question...and he has no answer for them!
Of course he has no answer...he didn't come up with it. You would have to ask Albert Einstein. He came up with it!
Professor Jacob Barnhardt, world-famous scientist
and Nobel Prize winner
Here are the links to Albert Einstein:
Professor
Jacob Barnhardt (Jacob is a Hebrew name)
Barnhardt ( Barnhardt is a German name)
Albert Einstein is Jewish and from Germany.
world-famous scientist (in the 50's that would be Einstein)
and Nobel Prize winner (Albert Einstein was a Nobel Prize winner)
and this is just the beginninng of the list! (besides that it's based on Albert Einstein,
the real Professor Bernhart, with that crazy hairdo)
"Klaatu barada nikto"????
Easy, it comes from Albert Einstein language...German!!!!
KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language.
Now, just reading or hearing KLAATU's dialogue you can tell it's Albert Einstein's voice that sending 'his message' through KLATU...
there is one scene where KLAATU tells the boy Bobby.."Remind me tomorrow
and I'll tell you about trains that run without tracks."
(in the movie, not in the script)
Did you know it was Albert Einstein that invented trains that don't need tracks to run?
(reverse electromagnetism something like that)
I heard the chinks gots trains that don't need tracks...
Am Montag000019, 19.05.2025 um 17:58 schrieb The Starmaker:
"Klaatu barada nikto"????
Easy, it comes from Albert Einstein language...German!!!!
KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language.
This is not German!
I have read, that this sentence means:
God will not destroy the Earth (possibly: this time?).
TH
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Montag000019, 19.05.2025 um 17:58 schrieb The Starmaker:
"Klaatu barada nikto"????
Easy, it comes from Albert Einstein language...German!!!!
KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language.
This is not German!
I have read, that this sentence means:
God will not destroy the Earth (possibly: this time?).
You are not thinking like an einstein...Klaatu in German
is speled Klass or Klaus meaning as the charater is portrayed..."victory of the people".
I gave you the script, I gave you the movie...can yous not THINK foryourselvesalready!!!!!
The Starmaker wrote:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Montag000019, 19.05.2025 um 17:58 schrieb The Starmaker:
"Klaatu barada nikto"????
Easy, it comes from Albert Einstein language...German!!!!
KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language.
This is not German!
I have read, that this sentence means:
God will not destroy the Earth (possibly: this time?).
You are not thinking like an einstein...Klaatu in German
Not German. Estonian
https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&text=klaatu&op=translate
Am Sonntag000025, 25.05.2025 um 07:56 schrieb Gronk:
The Starmaker wrote:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Montag000019, 19.05.2025 um 17:58 schrieb The Starmaker:
"Klaatu barada nikto"????
Easy, it comes from Albert Einstein language...German!!!!
KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language.
This is not German!
I have read, that this sentence means:
God will not destroy the Earth (possibly: this time?).
You are not thinking like an einstein...Klaatu in German
Not German. Estonian
https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&text=klaatu&op=translate
'Klaatu barada nikto"
Seems to be composed from three different Eastern European languages:
Klaatu is Estionian and means 'cloak'
barada is Russian and means 'nobody'
nikto is Slovak and means 'nobody'.
...
TH
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Sonntag000025, 25.05.2025 um 07:56 schrieb Gronk:
The Starmaker wrote:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Montag000019, 19.05.2025 um 17:58 schrieb The Starmaker:
"Klaatu barada nikto"????
Easy, it comes from Albert Einstein language...German!!!!
KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language.
This is not German!
I have read, that this sentence means:
God will not destroy the Earth (possibly: this time?).
You are not thinking like an einstein...Klaatu in German
Not German. Estonian
https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&text=klaatu&op=translate
'Klaatu barada nikto"
Seems to be composed from three different Eastern European languages:
Klaatu is Estionian and means 'cloak'
barada is Russian and means 'nobody'
nikto is Slovak and means 'nobody'.
...
TH
I'm surprised you didin't add it is also a name of a cat food brand in Afganastian!!!!
KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language. >>>>>>>This is not German!
I have read, that this sentence means:
God will not destroy the Earth (possibly: this time?).
You are not thinking like an einstein...Klaatu in German
Not German. Estonian
https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&text=klaatu&op=translate >>>>>
'Klaatu barada nikto"
Seems to be composed from three different Eastern European languages:
Klaatu is Estionian and means 'cloak'
barada is Russian and means 'nobody'
nikto is Slovak and means 'nobody'.
...
TH
I'm surprised you didin't add it is also a name of a cat food brand in
Afganastian!!!!
I have simply used 'google translator' and used the 'detect language'
function.
This is usually quite ok and certainly better than my own knowledge of
Eastern European languages.
I have actually some knowledge, but very little, since foreign
languages are not really 'my thing'.
I have tried Russian, Czechoslovakian, Hungarian, Lithuanian at some
times in the past, but with not very much success.
E.g. I can still decipher Cyrillic letters and know a few words in
Russian. But that's it.
I also have been in Lithuania and wanted to learn that language. But
the Baltic languages are REALLY hard to learn. (same with Hungarian).
They are reconstructing Prussian, so you will soon have four Baltic
languages to learn!
And I can assure you that the aboriginal Prussians did not speak German,
but Prussian, a language related to Lithuanian.
William Hyde wrote:
And I can assure you that the aboriginal Prussians did not speak German,
but Prussian, a language related to Lithuanian.
impossible; lithuanian is gay, a fag province territory of Greater Russia;
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Mittwoch000028, 28.05.2025 um 03:37 schrieb William Hyde:
KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German
language.
This is not German!
I have read, that this sentence means:
God will not destroy the Earth (possibly: this time?).
You are not thinking like an einstein...Klaatu in German
Not German. Estonian
https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&text=klaatu&op=translate >>>>>>>
'Klaatu barada nikto"
Seems to be composed from three different Eastern European languages: >>>>>>
Klaatu is Estionian and means 'cloak'
barada is Russian and means 'nobody'
nikto is Slovak and means 'nobody'.
...
TH
I'm surprised you didin't add it is also a name of a cat food brand in >>>>> Afganastian!!!!
I have simply used 'google translator' and used the 'detect
language' function.
This is usually quite ok and certainly better than my own knowledge
of Eastern European languages.
I have actually some knowledge, but very little, since foreign
languages are not really 'my thing'.
I have tried Russian, Czechoslovakian, Hungarian, Lithuanian at some
times in the past, but with not very much success.
E.g. I can still decipher Cyrillic letters and know a few words in
Russian. But that's it.
I also have been in Lithuania and wanted to learn that language. But
the Baltic languages are REALLY hard to learn. (same with Hungarian).
They are reconstructing Prussian, so you will soon have four Baltic
languages to learn!
I'm actually living in the former capital of prussia and can assure
you, that Prussians speak German.
I am talking, as I said above, about reconstructing Prussian, which
would be unnecessary if anyone spoke it today.
I think you are talking about Berlin, capital of Brandenburg-Prussia,
later shortened to "Prussia". I am talking about the original Prussia, later known as "East Prussia".
And I can assure you that the aboriginal Prussians did not speak German,
but Prussian, a language related to Lithuanian.
The descendants of those people now speak German, Polish, or in some
cases other languages, but there is a movement to revive the original
tongue, using old manuscripts as a start (the bible, I believe, was translated into Prussian). Which was the basis of my quip, above. I
don't actually expect that you will have to learn Prussian. Or that
anyone will.
Germans who inhabited the region centuries later came to be called "Prussians", which was geographically but not ethnically correct, except
in as much as some of them had ancestors who were aboriginal Prussians. This sense of the word "Prussian" dominates today to the extent that
most people do not know anything of the original Prussians.
Am Mittwoch000028, 28.05.2025 um 23:11 schrieb William Hyde:
I am talking, as I said above, about reconstructing Prussian, which
would be unnecessary if anyone spoke it today.
Ok, there was a language called 'Prussian' some time ago, which now has apparently vanished.
Am Sonntag000025, 25.05.2025 um 07:56 schrieb Gronk:
The Starmaker wrote:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Montag000019, 19.05.2025 um 17:58 schrieb The Starmaker:
"Klaatu barada nikto"????
Easy, it comes from Albert Einstein language...German!!!!
KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language.
This is not German!
I have read, that this sentence means:
God will not destroy the Earth (possibly: this time?).
You are not thinking like an einstein...Klaatu in German
Not German. Estonian
https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&text=klaatu&op=translate
'Klaatu barada nikto"
Seems to be composed from three different Eastern European languages:
Klaatu is Estionian and means 'cloak'
barada is Russian and means 'nobody'
nikto is Slovak and means 'nobody'.
E.g. Emanuel Kant lived there and I know, that he spoke German.
Kant may have had some Baltic ancestors on his father's side, but the
last known Prussian speakers date from more than a decade before his
birth. And I have no reason to believe that his father spoke it.
Cornish died out (mostly) a bit later, in the late 1700s, but it has
been successfully revived, with many speakers today.
The difference being that the Cornish know that they are Cornish, while most people with Old Prussian ancestry think of themselves as Germans,
Poles, or Lithuanians.
There is a line in "The Tin Drum" where in 1944 an East Prussian
resident says "We were here before the Germans or Russians". Whether
that's a fabrication on Grass' part or such people existed I do not
know. There is no indication that the character speaks Prussian, as far
as I can recall.
They had a kind of accent an spoke a German dialect in East Prussia,
but that was still German.
Possibly much earlier, there was an ethnic group, which spoke 'Prussian'.
That is actually possible, even if I have never heard about this.
Not possibly, certainly.
Have you heard of the Wends? Founders of Berlin (well, sort of)? There
are still about 80,000 people, known nown as Sorbs, who speak the
language in Germany, mostly in Saxony and Brandenburg.
The name "Berlin" itself may come from an old Slavic word for "Swamp".
It seems that all European nations have these fascinating minorities somewhere, largely forgotten, sometimes even by their descendants.
There is a village in southern Poland where the inhabitants speak an
unusual version of German. Their ancestors arrived from the extreme
west of Germany hundreds of years ago and their original tongue was
strongly influenced by Dutch or perhaps Frisian. Regrettably, I've lost the reference I have for this.
It is an extremely obscure idea, to revitalise an old and vanished
language, to honor an ethnicity, which had also vanished.
It may seem obscure to you,but it's actually not that rare. On the one
hand there's the desire to save languages that are nearly extinct, on
the other to revive languages that have only recently vanished.
Comparatively recently, that is.
Though - and I cannot stress this enough - nobody has to learn these languages. There is, however, a rock group in Lithuania which has taken
to singing some of its works in Prussian.
See: there have be tons of wars in what today is Germany.
In the so called 30-yeas-war most of Prussia was depopulated.
Actually East Prussia was relatively undamaged in the 30 years war
itself. It was occupied by Sweden for most of it and saw little
fighting, compared to most of the rest of Germany. The ruler of Brandenburg-Prussia tried his best to remain neutral in the war.
But the Great Northern War which followed a couple of generations later, together with the plague and famine that came with it, killed about 30%
of the population. It was about this time that the last Old Prussian speakers vanished.
Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.This has mainly to do with things like 'globalisation' or the internet.
Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language. Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
and lately Chinese.
Yep.Also mobility is much greater today than in ancient times. That's why
small languages are slowly fading away.
The 'Germans' are in most cases also not descendents of the tribes,
which the Romans named 'Germanes', because those tribes settled mainly
in current Denmark.
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Sonntag000025, 25.05.2025 um 07:56 schrieb Gronk:
I'm surprised you didin't add it is also a name of a cat food brand in Afganastian!!!!
On 31/5/25 21:55, Governor Swill wrote:
Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.This has mainly to do with things like 'globalisation' or the internet.
Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
and lately Chinese.
Yep.Also mobility is much greater today than in ancient times. That's why
small languages are slowly fading away.
The story is from the boot if Italy to Nice, each village could
communicate with adjacent villages. There was no one spot it switched
between Italian and French. Once they drew a border with Italy on one
side and France on the other, language and other customs diverge. It is modern nationalism where governments want people to belong to them based
on where they drew lines.
It is why Balkans have such a problem. Walk along a road and one family
is Bosnian, the next is Serbian, then Bosnian. People of different
'nations' are so thoroughly mixed, you cannot draw lines without
separating families or merging enemies.
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Samstag000031, 31.05.2025 um 23:28 schrieb William Hyde:
Dutch is actually relatively close to German
Indeed. When in the Netherlands I found that my knowledge of English, combined with the decayed remnants of my German, allowed me to read most signage. After a week or two I was able to read more complex inscriptions.
I got through a page of "The Lord of the Rings" in Norwegian by similar means, though it probably helped that I'd already read it in English.
and could also be regarded
as proper English name for 'German'.
It's an odd situation.
The English name you after one group mentioned by the Romans, the French after another, but the actual descendants of the Romans at least make a
stab at the right name.
The Irish use the same group as the English, but the Welsh follow the
French model, as do the Spanish.
You have the same situation as Greece, which foreigners have been
misnaming since 500 BC. And of course there are more such examples.
But the British
Not all the British, see above.
used 'German' instead of 'Dutch' because 'Dutch' was
already in use for the language of the Netherlands.
I wish I could believe they were that rational, but I doubt it.
I can find no Anglo-Saxon word for "Germany". They had words for
various tribes, for the Franks and the Burgundians, and "Denmark" was a
word, but no word for the lands where German speaking people lived.
Perhaps they just called it "the old country".
So by the time the English felt the need for a word describing the area,
they probably just went with the Latin, the more so as most literate
people at the time were in the church.
The English name you after one group mentioned by the Romans, the
French after another, but the actual descendants of the Romans at
least make a stab at the right name.
The Irish use the same group as the English, but the Welsh follow the
French model, as do the Spanish.
You have the same situation as Greece, which foreigners have been
misnaming since 500 BC. And of course there are more such examples.
;
But the British
Not all the British, see above.
used 'German' instead of 'Dutch' because 'Dutch' was
already in use for the language of the Netherlands.
I wish I could believe they were that rational, but I doubt it.
I can find no Anglo-Saxon word for "Germany". They had words for
various tribes, for the Franks and the Burgundians, and "Denmark" was
a word, but no word for the lands where German speaking people lived.
Perhaps they just called it "the old country".
There was no country at that time, where all German speakers lived.
German was actually a language, which was spoken in many areas of
Europe and possibly beyond.
Modern Germany was founded in 1871 and was created by fusing together
about 1000 different mainly tiny entities.
Prior to that year there was no Germany and certainly also not at the
times of the Anglo-Saxons.
So, the Anglo-Saxons had no need to name a country, which didn't exist.
Actually the "Kingdom of Germany" dates from the breakup of
Charlemagne's empire, formed in the Treaty of Verdun in 843. It was
later absorbed into the Holy Roman Empire, which was later renamed
(circa 1500) "The Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation". Which I
presume is why the 1871 state was the second empire.
Naturally, the word used for "German" in the above varies from place to
place - wikipedia is helpful here, giving:
"The Kingdom of Germany or German Kingdom (Latin: regnum Teutonicorum 'kingdom of the Germans', regnum Teutonicum 'German kingdom',[1] regnum Alamanie "kingdom of Germany",[2] German: Deutsches Königreich)"
so the Anglo-Saxons really did need a name, and they went with Caesar's version.
French took the 'Alemanes', which were a people or tribe, which
possibly stem from the south-west of Europe and settled in the south-
west of Germany.
Romans used a general term (like in many other cases), and called all
the people from the North of the limes 'Germanes'.
This word was, of course, not used by the 'Germanes', who also didn't
call their country 'Germany' (which, btw, hadn't existed at that time).
So by the time the English felt the need for a word describing the
area, they probably just went with the Latin, the more so as most
literate people at the time were in the church.
English is (in my opinion) actually closer related to Latin than
current Italian.
"This is not true".
"I do not believe this"
"This is not the case".
Only the third of these remarks has a word arising from Latin.
On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 18:49:14 +0200, Thomas Heger <[email protected]>
wrote:
Am Sonntag000001, 01.06.2025 um 23:57 schrieb William Hyde:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Samstag000031, 31.05.2025 um 23:28 schrieb William Hyde:
Dutch is actually relatively close to German
Indeed. When in the Netherlands I found that my knowledge of English,
combined with the decayed remnants of my German, allowed me to read most >>> signage. After a week or two I was able to read more complex
inscriptions.
I got through a page of "The Lord of the Rings" in Norwegian by similar
means, though it probably helped that I'd already read it in English.
and could also be regarded
as proper English name for 'German'.
It's an odd situation.
The English name you after one group mentioned by the Romans, the French >>> after another, but the actual descendants of the Romans at least make a
stab at the right name.
The Irish use the same group as the English, but the Welsh follow the
French model, as do the Spanish.
You have the same situation as Greece, which foreigners have been
misnaming since 500 BC. And of course there are more such examples.
>
> But the British
Not all the British, see above.
used 'German' instead of 'Dutch' because 'Dutch' was
> already in use for the language of the Netherlands.
I wish I could believe they were that rational, but I doubt it.
I can find no Anglo-Saxon word for "Germany". They had words for
various tribes, for the Franks and the Burgundians, and "Denmark" was a
word, but no word for the lands where German speaking people lived.
Perhaps they just called it "the old country".
There was no country at that time, where all German speakers lived.
German was actually a language, which was spoken in many areas of Europe
and possibly beyond.
Modern Germany was founded in 1871 and was created by fusing together
about 1000 different mainly tiny entities.
Prior to that year there was no Germany and certainly also not at the
times of the Anglo-Saxons.
So, the Anglo-Saxons had no need to name a country, which didn't exist.
Angles - Angle land - England.
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Dienstag000003, 03.06.2025 um 00:49 schrieb William Hyde:
...
exist.The English name you after one group mentioned by the Romans, the
French after another, but the actual descendants of the Romans at
least make a stab at the right name.
The Irish use the same group as the English, but the Welsh follow
the French model, as do the Spanish.
You have the same situation as Greece, which foreigners have been
misnaming since 500 BC. And of course there are more such examples. >>>>>
;
But the British
Not all the British, see above.
used 'German' instead of 'Dutch' because 'Dutch' was
already in use for the language of the Netherlands.
I wish I could believe they were that rational, but I doubt it.
I can find no Anglo-Saxon word for "Germany". They had words for
various tribes, for the Franks and the Burgundians, and "Denmark"
was a word, but no word for the lands where German speaking people
lived. Perhaps they just called it "the old country".
There was no country at that time, where all German speakers lived.
German was actually a language, which was spoken in many areas of
Europe and possibly beyond.
Modern Germany was founded in 1871 and was created by fusing
together about 1000 different mainly tiny entities.
Prior to that year there was no Germany and certainly also not at
the times of the Anglo-Saxons.
;
So, the Anglo-Saxons had no need to name a country, which didn't
;
Actually the "Kingdom of Germany" dates from the breakup of
Charlemagne's empire, formed in the Treaty of Verdun in 843. It was
later absorbed into the Holy Roman Empire, which was later renamed
(circa 1500) "The Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation". Which I
presume is why the 1871 state was the second empire.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regnum_Teutonicum
The 'Regnum Teutonicum' was obviously named after the Teutons.
This was a people who lived in the norther region of Denmark and do
not belong to the set of people, which build the population of present
day Germany.
Actually all the tribes, which were called 'Germanes' by the Romans,
stem from the regions, which belonged to Denmark.
Naturally, the word used for "German" in the above varies from place
to place - wikipedia is helpful here, giving:
"The Kingdom of Germany or German Kingdom (Latin: regnum Teutonicorum
'kingdom of the Germans', regnum Teutonicum 'German kingdom',[1]
regnum Alamanie "kingdom of Germany",[2] German: Deutsches Königreich)" >>>
so the Anglo-Saxons really did need a name, and they went with
Caesar's version.
'Angeln' is the name of a region in the north of Schleswig Holstein,
which was a part of Denmark, too. That was the region, were the Anglo-
Saxons came from.
The German state 'Sachsen' is in no way related to Saxons, because
'Sax' was the name of an ancient weapon (kind of ax).
These Anglo-Saxons settled also in 'Niedersachsen', but most likely
didn't speak German or called themselves 'Germanes'.
So, why should they call their kingdom 'Germany'?
My point is that circa 850 the Anglo-Saxons in England needed a name for
this new kingdom. Ango-Saxon missionaries, active in Germany at the
time, would have been well aware that the word "German" was not in use there. But as Latin speakers they probably went with the Latin example,
and used "Germania". Which was easy to remember because every Latin
speaker had read Caesar's memoirs.
Irish missionaries were also prominent in Germany (in fact Rome
commanded Anglo-Saxon missionaries to go to Germany specifically to
counter the Irish, who were regarded as heretical - how times change),
and it seems that they, too, went with the Latin example.
It is notable that the Welsh, an independent people, disagreed.
Am Mittwoch000028, 28.05.2025 um 23:11 schrieb William Hyde:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Mittwoch000028, 28.05.2025 um 03:37 schrieb William Hyde:
They are reconstructing Prussian, so you will soon have four Baltic
languages to learn!
I'm actually living in the former capital of prussia and can assure
you, that Prussians speak German.
I am talking, as I said above, about reconstructing Prussian, which
would be unnecessary if anyone spoke it today.
Ok, there was a language called 'Prussian' some time ago, which now has
apparently vanished.
Well, that seems to be the fate of a large number of small languages
around the globe.
This has mainly to do with things like 'globalisation' or the internet.
Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language. Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
and lately Chinese.
Mobility also has little to do with this processAlso mobility is much greater today than in ancient times. That's why
small languages are slowly fading away.
Yep.
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 00:03:26 -0600, Gronk wrote:
The internet doesn't have much to do with the
disappearance of a language. Forms of mass
communication, specifically something like radio
and then movies and tv, can have and did have
a tremendous impact. They brought a dominant
(and uniform) language into (remote) places with
little effort. This can't be undersestimated. Even
regional accents are disappearing.
That bit is thanks to movies, radio and TV. A version of any given
language, a standard, that is understandable to all speakers must be
used.
News readers usually speak American standard.
Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger <[email protected]>
Am Mittwoch000028, 28.05.2025 um 23:11 schrieb William Hyde:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Mittwoch000028, 28.05.2025 um 03:37 schrieb William Hyde:
They are reconstructing Prussian, so you will soon have four Baltic
languages to learn!
I'm actually living in the former capital of prussia and can assure
you, that Prussians speak German.
I am talking, as I said above, about reconstructing Prussian, which
would be unnecessary if anyone spoke it today.
Ok, there was a language called 'Prussian' some time ago, which now has
apparently vanished.
Well, that seems to be the fate of a large number of small languages
around the globe.
This has mainly to do with things like 'globalisation' or the internet.
Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language. Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
and lately Chinese.
English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant
for most speakers of English as a second language:
English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)
English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special
cases.
This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European
branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues, especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old
French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class.
For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it
with fine wine and called it pork.
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:<snip>
Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger
> Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
> Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
> Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language. >>> > Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common >>> > second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian >>> > and lately Chinese.
German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.
Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun.
Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.
The language itself has also disadvantages.
This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to
call 'manuals'.
These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence
the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas.
English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs
can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.
English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most
speakers of English as a second language:
English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)
English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases.
This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European
branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues, especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old
French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class.
For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it
with fine wine and called it pork.
Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:<snip>
Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger
> Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
> Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
> Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
> Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common >>> > second languages today.� English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian >>> > and lately Chinese.
German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.
Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun.
Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.
The language itself has also disadvantages.
This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to
call 'manuals'.
These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence
the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas.
English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs
can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.
Sure.
But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.
The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers almost certainly bad speakers of English.
This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny
than useful.
English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most
speakers of English as a second language:
English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)
English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases.
This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European
branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues, especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old
French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class.
For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it
with fine wine and called it pork.
English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the English language.
Keltic languages
Latin
Danish
French
German
Dutch
Hindi
Kisuaheli
...
TH
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs
Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger >>> <snip>
> Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization. >>>>> > Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages. >>>>> > Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
> Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common >>>>> > second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
> and lately Chinese.
German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.
Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun.
Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.
The language itself has also disadvantages.
This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to >>>> call 'manuals'.
These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence >>>> the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas. >>>
can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.
Sure.
But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.
The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers
almost certainly bad speakers of English.
This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny
than useful.
English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most >>>> speakers of English as a second language:
English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)
English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases.
This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European
branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues,
especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old
French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class.
For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it
with fine wine and called it pork.
English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the
English language.
Keltic languages
Latin
Danish
French
German
Dutch
Hindi
Kisuaheli
...
TH
That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to get
rid of
all these foreign influences.
In Mexicao they say "tele"
In Britian they say "tele"...
in the United States we say...Television!
TELEVISION!!!!
Learn English!
It is the Official Language of The United States.
Buy a Webster Dictionary today...
Math is a language very little people know..
anyone here speak penquin?
Did you know dinosaurs didn't...roar? they tweet.
Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs
Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger >>> <snip>
> Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization. >>>>> > Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages. >>>>> > Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
> Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
> second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
> and lately Chinese.
German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.
Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun.
Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.
The language itself has also disadvantages.
This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to >>>> call 'manuals'.
These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence >>>> the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas. >>>
can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.
Sure.
But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.
The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers >> almost certainly bad speakers of English.
This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny >> than useful.
English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most >>>> speakers of English as a second language:This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European
English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)
English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases. >>>
branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues,
especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old
French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class. >>> For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it
with fine wine and called it pork.
English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the
English language.
Keltic languages
Latin
Danish
French
German
Dutch
Hindi
Kisuaheli
...
TH
That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to get
rid of
all these foreign influences.
In Mexicao they say "tele"
In Britian they say "tele"...
in the United States we say...Television!
TELEVISION!!!!
Learn English!
I can speak, read and write English quite well, even if that isn't perfect.
But English is a second language for me. (My native language is German.)
On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 09:03:28 +0200, Thomas Heger <[email protected]>
wrote:
Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:No, we don't. We say "TV".
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:<snip>
Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger
English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs> Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization. >>>>>> > Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages. >>>>>> > Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
> Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
> second languages today.� English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
> and lately Chinese.
German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.
Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun. >>>>>
Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.
The language itself has also disadvantages.
This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to >>>>> call 'manuals'.
These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence >>>>> the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas. >>>>
can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.
Sure.
But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.
The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers >>> almost certainly bad speakers of English.
This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny >>> than useful.
English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most >>>>> speakers of English as a second language:This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European
English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)
English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases. >>>>
branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues,
especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old
French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class. >>>> For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it
with fine wine and called it pork.
English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the >>> English language.
Keltic languages
Latin
Danish
French
German
Dutch
Hindi
Kisuaheli
...
TH
That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to get
rid of
all these foreign influences.
In Mexicao they say "tele"
In Britian they say "tele"...
in the United States we say...Television!
On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:01:43 +0200, Thomas Heger <[email protected]>
wrote:
English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the
English language.
Keltic languages
Latin
Danish
French
German
Dutch
Hindi
Kisuaheli
All stemming from Indo-European. Sanskrit.
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs
Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger >>>>> <snip>
> Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization. >>>>>>> > Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages. >>>>>>> > Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
> Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
> second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
> and lately Chinese.
German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.
Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun. >>>>>>
Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.
The language itself has also disadvantages.
This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to >>>>>> call 'manuals'.
These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence >>>>>> the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas. >>>>>
can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.
Sure.
But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.
The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers >>>> almost certainly bad speakers of English.
This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny >>>> than useful.
English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most >>>>>> speakers of English as a second language:This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European
English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)
English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases. >>>>>
branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues,
especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old
French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class. >>>>> For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it
with fine wine and called it pork.
English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the >>>> English language.
Keltic languages
Latin
Danish
French
German
Dutch
Hindi
Kisuaheli
...
TH
That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to get
rid of
all these foreign influences.
In Mexicao they say "tele"
In Britian they say "tele"...
in the United States we say...Television!
TELEVISION!!!!
Learn English!
I can speak, read and write English quite well, even if that isn't perfect. >>
But English is a second language for me. (My native language is German.)
You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want
Germany to posses nucluer weapons????
i don't see Germany today commiting genocide or bothering their
neighbors...
Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:
Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine.
There are a few common
second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
and lately Chinese.
German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.
Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun.
Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.
The language itself has also disadvantages.
This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to
call 'manuals'.
These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence
the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas.
English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most speakers of English as a second language:
English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)
English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases.
Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb The Starmaker:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:<snip>
Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger
English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs >>>>>> can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.> Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
> Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
> Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a >>>>>>>> language.
> Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
> second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish,
Italian
> and lately Chinese.
German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.
Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun. >>>>>>>
Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.
The language itself has also disadvantages.
This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to >>>>>>> call 'manuals'.
These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence >>>>>>> the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas. >>>>>>
Sure.
But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.
The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers >>>>> almost certainly bad speakers of English.
This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny >>>>> than useful.
English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most >>>>>>> speakers of English as a second language:This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European
English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)
English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases. >>>>>>
branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues, >>>>>> especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old >>>>>> French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class. >>>>>> For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it >>>>>> with fine wine and called it pork.
English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the >>>>> English language.
Keltic languages
Latin
Danish
French
German
Dutch
Hindi
Kisuaheli
...
TH
That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to get >>>> rid of
all these foreign influences.
In Mexicao they say "tele"
In Britian they say "tele"...
in the United States we say...Television!
TELEVISION!!!!
Learn English!
I can speak, read and write English quite well, even if that isn't perfect. >>>
But English is a second language for me. (My native language is German.)
You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want
Germany to posses nucluer weapons????
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
On 6/15/2025 1:08 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb The Starmaker:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:<snip>
Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200,
Thomas Heger
> Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before
globalization. > Conquest, military and non military
can wipe out small languages. > Cultures can be
absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
> Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There >>>>>>>>> are a few common > second languages today.Â
English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
> and lately Chinese.
German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.
Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for >>>>>>>> fun.
Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.
The language itself has also disadvantages.
This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they >>>>>>>> like to call 'manuals'.
These little papers reveal a lack of something called
'grammar', hence the language has a lack of possibility to
express certain subtle ideas.
English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English
signs can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.
Sure.
But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.
The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese
speakers almost certainly bad speakers of English.
This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are
more funny than useful.
English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant >>>>>>>> for most speakers of English as a second language:
English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)
English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special >>>>>>>> cases.
This is largely because English comes from the same Indo
European branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance >>>>>>> languagues, especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge >>>>>>> number of Old French words entered common usage in England,
often delineating class. For example, Britons ate pigs, but the
French conquerors served it with fine wine and called it pork.
English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks
in the English language.
Keltic languages
Latin
Danish
French
German
Dutch
Hindi
Kisuaheli
...
TH
That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to
get rid of
all these foreign influences.
In Mexicao they say "tele"
In Britian they say "tele"...
in the United States we say...Television!
TELEVISION!!!!
Learn English!
I can speak, read and write English quite well, even if that isn't
perfect.
But English is a second language for me. (My native language is
German.)
You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want
Germany to posses nucluer weapons????
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
Germany never had an atom bomb. The program was scuttled in 1942.
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
Germany never had an atom bomb. The program was scuttled in 1942.
Germany never had an atom bomb. The program was scuttled in 1942.Germany rejected the research done by
the top experts as "Jewish science" which hindered their progress considerably.
On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 10:08:17 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
If they had been, Hitler would have used them.
(what they told you in school was more or less a lie)
The reality was that Germany was following a different path to the
same goal but it didn't work out. For one reason, the Norwegian
resistance managed to destroy their supply of heavy water.
The reality was that Germany was following a different path to the
same goal but it didn't work out. For one reason, the Norwegian
resistance managed to destroy their supply of heavy water.
On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 09:03:28 +0200, Thomas Heger <[email protected]>
wrote:
Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:No, we don't. We say "TV".
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs
Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger >>>>> <snip>
> Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization. >>>>>>> > Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages. >>>>>>> > Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
> Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
> second languages today.� English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
> and lately Chinese.
German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.
Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun. >>>>>>
Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.
The language itself has also disadvantages.
This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to >>>>>> call 'manuals'.
These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence >>>>>> the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas. >>>>>
can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.
Sure.
But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.
The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers >>>> almost certainly bad speakers of English.
This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny >>>> than useful.
English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most >>>>>> speakers of English as a second language:This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European
English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)
English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases. >>>>>
branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues,
especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old
French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class. >>>>> For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it
with fine wine and called it pork.
English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the >>>> English language.
Keltic languages
Latin
Danish
French
German
Dutch
Hindi
Kisuaheli
...
TH
That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to get
rid of
all these foreign influences.
In Mexicao they say "tele"
In Britian they say "tele"...
in the United States we say...Television!
On 15/6/25 10:08, OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
Germany never had an atom bomb. The program was scuttled in 1942.
Nuclear fission was discoverred in Germany.
Once that was established the question shifted from science to technology.
Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb The Starmaker:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:<snip>
Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger
> Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
> Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
> Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
> Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
> second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
> and lately Chinese.
German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.
Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun. >>>>>>
Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.
The language itself has also disadvantages.
This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to
call 'manuals'.
These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence >>>>>> the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas.
English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs >>>>> can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.
Sure.
But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.
The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers >>>> almost certainly bad speakers of English.
This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny >>>> than useful.
English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for mostThis is largely because English comes from the same Indo European
speakers of English as a second language:
English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)
English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases. >>>>>
branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues, >>>>> especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old
French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class. >>>>> For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it >>>>> with fine wine and called it pork.
English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the >>>> English language.
Keltic languages
Latin
Danish
French
German
Dutch
Hindi
Kisuaheli
...
TH
That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to get >>> rid of
all these foreign influences.
In Mexicao they say "tele"
In Britian they say "tele"...
in the United States we say...Television!
TELEVISION!!!!
Learn English!
I can speak, read and write English quite well, even if that isn't perfect.
But English is a second language for me. (My native language is German.)
You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want
Germany to posses nucluer weapons????
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
(what they told you in school was more or less a lie)
But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult to use
and extremely expensive.
Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy has them,
too, they are practically useless.
But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to.
i don't see Germany today commiting genocide or bothering their neighbors...
Well, Germans had a share of such attrocities and have actually enough
of that.
TH
OrigInfoJunkie <[email protected]> wrote in news:D6D3Q.1423448$[email protected]:
On 6/15/2025 1:08 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb The Starmaker:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:<snip>
Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, >>>>>>>>> Thomas Heger
   > Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before >>>>>>>>> globalization.    > Conquest, military and non military >>>>>>>>> can wipe out small languages.    > Cultures can be
absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
   > Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There >>>>>>>>> are a few common    > second languages today.Ã∞â•˚ >>>>>>>>> English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
   > and lately Chinese.
German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.
Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for >>>>>>>> fun.
Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.
The language itself has also disadvantages.
This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they >>>>>>>> like to call 'manuals'.
These little papers reveal a lack of something called
'grammar', hence the language has a lack of possibility to
express certain subtle ideas.
English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English >>>>>>> signs can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.
Sure.
But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.
The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese
speakers almost certainly bad speakers of English.
This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are
more funny than useful.
English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant >>>>>>>> for most speakers of English as a second language:
English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)
English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special >>>>>>>> cases.
This is largely because English comes from the same Indo
European branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance >>>>>>> languagues, especially French.  Owing to the Conquest, a huge >>>>>>> number of Old French words entered common usage in England,
often delineating class. For example, Britons ate pigs, but the >>>>>>> French conquerors served it with fine wine and called it pork.
English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks >>>>>> in the English language.
Keltic languages
Latin
Danish
French
German
Dutch
Hindi
Kisuaheli
...
TH
That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to >>>>> get rid of
all these foreign influences.
In Mexicao they say "tele"
In Britian they say "tele"...
in the United States we say...Television!
TELEVISION!!!!
Learn English!
I can speak, read and write English quite well, even if that isn't
perfect.
But English is a second language for me. (My native language is
German.)
You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want
Germany to posses nucluer weapons????
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
Germany never had an atom bomb. The program was scuttled in 1942.
Germany rejected the research done by
the top experts as "Jewish science" which
hindered their progress considerably.
Jan
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb The Starmaker:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:<snip>
Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger
> Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
> Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
> Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
> Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
> second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
> and lately Chinese.
German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.
Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun. >>>>>>
Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.
The language itself has also disadvantages.
This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to
call 'manuals'.
These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence
the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas.
English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs >>>>> can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.
Sure.
But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.
The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers
almost certainly bad speakers of English.
This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny
than useful.
English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most
speakers of English as a second language:
English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)
English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases.
This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European >>>>> branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues, >>>>> especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old >>>>> French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class.
For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it >>>>> with fine wine and called it pork.
English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the
English language.
Keltic languages
Latin
Danish
French
German
Dutch
Hindi
Kisuaheli
...
TH
That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to get >>> rid of
all these foreign influences.
In Mexicao they say "tele"
In Britian they say "tele"...
in the United States we say...Television!
TELEVISION!!!!
Learn English!
I can speak, read and write English quite well, even if that isn't perfect.
But English is a second language for me. (My native language is German.)
You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want Germany to posses nucluer weapons????
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
(what they told you in school was more or less a lie)
But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult to use
and extremely expensive.
Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy has them, too, they are practically useless.
But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to.
Of course the Germans were the first to invent the atomic bomb...it
was invented by a German, living in Germany and his name was...Albert Einstein.
he just continued his invention with his German friends in the USA!
On 2025-06-16 05:57, J. J. Lodder wrote:
[...]
Jan
Bye bye
Siri Cruz wrote:
On 15/6/25 6:03, Governor Swill wrote:
The reality was that Germany was following a different path to the
same goal but it didn't work out. For one reason, the Norwegian
resistance managed to destroy their supply of heavy water.
Germany was following a dead end. They were fixated on heavy water.
Fermi realised boron could be removed from graphite to serve the same
purposed as heavy water. Fermi had a working reactor in 1942 while
Germans were still playing with themselves in 1945. The reactor proved a
self sustaining fission chain reaction was possible. More reactors
followed and the plutonium was created.
And even though the allies went with graphite, by 1945 we were producing considerable amounts of heavy water. More, I think, per month than
German acquired in the whole war.
William Hyde
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
William Hyde wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:i prefer a drank beer
Siri Cruz wrote:
On 15/6/25 6:03, Governor Swill wrote:
The reality was that Germany was following a different path to the
same goal but it didn't work out. For one reason, the Norwegian
resistance managed to destroy their supply of heavy water.
Germany was following a dead end. They were fixated on heavy water.
Fermi realised boron could be removed from graphite to serve the same
purposed as heavy water. Fermi had a working reactor in 1942 while
Germans were still playing with themselves in 1945. The reactor proved a >>>> self sustaining fission chain reaction was possible. More reactors
followed and the plutonium was created.
And even though the allies went with graphite, by 1945 we were producing >>> considerable amounts of heavy water. More, I think, per month than
German acquired in the whole war.
William Hyde
I prefer a high-gravity beer.
The Starmaker wrote:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb The Starmaker:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:<snip>
Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger
> Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
> Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
> Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
> Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
> second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
> and lately Chinese.
German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.
Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun.
Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.
The language itself has also disadvantages.
This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to
call 'manuals'.
These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence
the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas.
English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs >>>>> can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.
Sure.
But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.
The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers
almost certainly bad speakers of English.
This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny
than useful.
English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most
speakers of English as a second language:
English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)
English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases.
This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European >>>>> branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues, >>>>> especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old >>>>> French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class.
For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it >>>>> with fine wine and called it pork.
English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the
English language.
Keltic languages
Latin
Danish
French
German
Dutch
Hindi
Kisuaheli
...
TH
That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to get
rid of
all these foreign influences.
In Mexicao they say "tele"
In Britian they say "tele"...
in the United States we say...Television!
TELEVISION!!!!
Learn English!
I can speak, read and write English quite well, even if that isn't perfect.
But English is a second language for me. (My native language is German.)
You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want Germany to posses nucluer weapons????
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
(what they told you in school was more or less a lie)
But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult to use and extremely expensive.
Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy has them, too, they are practically useless.
But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to.
Of course the Germans were the first to invent the atomic bomb...it
was invented by a German, living in Germany and his name was...Albert Einstein.
he just continued his invention with his German friends in the USA!
Let's not forget real History...
it was Einstein who said:
"If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
His formula for the atomic bomb was invented in 1905 in Germany!
Published in German!! Written in Geramn!!!
The Germans invented the fucking atomic bomb...Einstein and his friends
were those Germans!
if you
take away
the shell
of a snail...
he's still
a snail.
On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 10:08:17 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
If they had been, Hitler would have used them.
On 15/6/25 10:08, OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
Germany never had an atom bomb. The program was scuttled in 1942.
Nuclear fission was discoverred in Germany.
Once that was established the question shifted from science to technology.
Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun.
Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.
The language itself has also disadvantages.
This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like
to call 'manuals'.
These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence
the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas.
Not a good rationalization, seems Nazi-like, and it's not really a
language feature. The modern Chinese-made goods are highly competitive because production is optimized to minimize costs, including the
translator's expenses. Their
vendors' approach is so that the product should speak for
itself as such without a nicely written manual, especially when it comes
to cheap products. They simply do not care.
But if it turns out that a good manual is important for increasing sales
then be sure there will be a good manual.
English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for
most speakers of English as a second language:
English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million)
English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases.
Basically English is simple and especially convenient for
writing and reading. Small number of letters, no diacritics
and the like. Many "rules" may (and/or should) be ignored.
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb The Starmaker:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb The Starmaker:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Dienstag000010, 10.06.2025 um 12:56 schrieb Governor Swill: >>>>> On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:04:30 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk:<snip>
Governor Swill wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2025 08:41:43 +0200, Thomas Heger
> Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization.
> Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages.
> Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language.
> Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. There are a few common
> second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian
> and lately Chinese.
German was actually a 'lingua franca', too.
Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun.
Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.
The language itself has also disadvantages.
This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to
call 'manuals'.
These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence
the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas.
English is quite common in Asia. In photos of cities English signs
can often be seen and not all are 'brand names'.
Sure.
But that 'English' isn't the language of the British Islands.
The problem is, that the iternal logic of Chinese makes Chinese speakers
almost certainly bad speakers of English.
This is why many 'English manuals' of products from China are more funny
than useful.
English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most
speakers of English as a second language:
English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million) >>>>>>
English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases.
This is largely because English comes from the same Indo European >>>>> branch as German but is heavily modified by the Romance languagues,
especially French. Owing to the Conquest, a huge number of Old >>>>> French words entered common usage in England, often delineating class.
For example, Britons ate pigs, but the French conquerors served it
with fine wine and called it pork.
English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the
English language.
Keltic languages
Latin
Danish
French
German
Dutch
Hindi
Kisuaheli
...
TH
That is whay Daniel Webster invented the "Webster Dictionary"...to get
rid of
all these foreign influences.
In Mexicao they say "tele"
In Britian they say "tele"...
in the United States we say...Television!
TELEVISION!!!!
Learn English!
I can speak, read and write English quite well, even if that isn't perfect.
But English is a second language for me. (My native language is German.)
You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want Germany to posses nucluer weapons????
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
(what they told you in school was more or less a lie)
But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult to use and extremely expensive.
Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy has them,
too, they are practically useless.
But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to.
Of course the Germans were the first to invent the atomic bomb...it
was invented by a German, living in Germany and his name was...Albert Einstein.
he just continued his invention with his German friends in the USA!
Let's not forget real History...
it was Einstein who said:
"If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
His formula for the atomic bomb was invented in 1905 in Germany!
Published in German!! Written in Geramn!!!
The Germans invented the fucking atomic bomb...Einstein and his friends were those Germans!
if you
take away
the shell
of a snail...
he's still
a snail.
Did you see the selfie of Einstein and Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and his atomic bomb formula?
https://content.time.com/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
J. J. Lodder wrote:
Wolf K <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-06-16 05:57, J. J. Lodder wrote:
[...]
Jan
Bye bye
Good to see another fan of Rush Limbaugh.
Have Canadians gone crazy too?
If I haven't yet, this group will do the job.
I've been trying to kill afrb from this thread for a while. Maybe I
will succeed this time.
It's true that there were some very smart people working on the nazi
atomic bomb program.
But reading Wheeler on the allied project, I get the impression that
there were hundreds of such working there - many refugees from Europe.
Am Sonntag000015, 15.06.2025 um 13:45 schrieb Oleg Smirnov:
Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun.
Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.
The language itself has also disadvantages.
This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to
call 'manuals'.
These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence
the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas.
Not a good rationalization, seems Nazi-like, and it's not really a
language feature. The modern Chinese-made goods are highly competitive
because production is optimized to minimize costs, including the
translator's expenses. Their
vendors' approach is so that the product should speak for
itself as such without a nicely written manual, especially when it comes
to cheap products. They simply do not care.
But if it turns out that a good manual is important for increasing sales
then be sure there will be a good manual.
Products do not speak for themselves.
Products themselves are actually only half of what the customers want.
Usually manuals, software, warranties, repair service, parts supply,
service manuals, advertising of the brand, fashion or similar are also
part of what costumers want.
So: a good company would take care of their market and would provide
things like spare parts or installation services.
But China is doing mainly manufactoring and in many cases nothing more
than that and simple shipping stuff abroad in plastic bags.
Instead of a manual these manufacturers put tiny pieces of paper into the box, which contain almost unreadable advices in five to ten different languages.
They didn't have an atomic bomb. The program was stopped in 1942,
according to Albert Speer.
On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 12:58:42 -0700, OrigInfoJunkie <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 6/15/2025 6:03 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 10:08:17 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
If they had been, Hitler would have used them.
They didn't have an atomic bomb.
They didn't have an atomic bomb because Germany surrendered before
they could get one built.
The program was stopped in 1942, according to Albert Speer.
Then what were the Nazis were doing with heavy water in 1944?
The Norwegian ferry Hydro was sunk in Lake Tinnsjå (also known as Lake
Tinn) on February 20, 1944, by Norwegian resistance fighters.
"Norwegian heavy water sabotage" <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_heavy_water_sabotage>
"Heavy Water War - The story" <https://www.visitnorway.com/listings/heavy-water-war-the-story/1474/>
"Hitler's nuclear bomb dream was sunk on ferry" <https://www.9news.com.au/world/hitler-was-just-a-ferry-ride-away-from-building-his-nucelar-bomb-tv-show-reveals/cf96285a-9900-4b35-9b62-05c9e4f417f3>
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
Germany never had an atom bomb. The program was scuttled in 1942.
Nuclear fission was discoverred in Germany.
That's nice.
*discovered*, you fucking idiot — only one fucking 'r'
Germany never mastered it.
Once that was established the question shifted from science to technology. >>
Exactly - but they didn't stop trying until allied forces overran all
their research facilities and captured their scientists.
You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want
Germany to posses nucluer weapons????
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
(what they told you in school was more or less a lie)
But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult to use
and extremely expensive.
Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy has them, >>> too, they are practically useless.
But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to.
Of course the Germans were the first to invent the atomic bomb...it
was invented by a German, living in Germany and his name was...Albert
Einstein.
he just continued his invention with his German friends in the USA!
Let's not forget real History...
it was Einstein who said:
"If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
His formula for the atomic bomb was invented in 1905 in Germany!
Published in German!! Written in Geramn!!!
The Germans invented the fucking atomic bomb...Einstein and his friends
were those Germans!
He said: "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up
my
formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
"foreseen: to know in advance; be aware of beforehand; https://www.dictionary.com › browse › foreseen
verb (used with object)?? foresaw, foreseen, foreseeing. to have
prescience of; to know in advance;
The TRUTH is, Albert Einstein knew in advance; was aware of beforehand;
that the atomic bomb
would be used on Japan.
The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan in August, 1945...twice. But Albert Einstein was
notified that the bomb would be dropped on Japan earlier that year in
March.
And he never mentioned it to ANYONE between March and August...not even
once!
Here is the memo Albert Einstein enclosed with his letter to FDR
notifying of the March decision.
https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1431098020930592777/photo/1
Thomas Heger, <news:[email protected]>
Am Sonntag000015, 15.06.2025 um 13:45 schrieb Oleg Smirnov:
Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun.Not a good rationalization, seems Nazi-like, and it's not really a
Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult.
The language itself has also disadvantages.
This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to >>>> call 'manuals'.
These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence >>>> the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas. >>>
language feature. The modern Chinese-made goods are highly competitive
because production is optimized to minimize costs, including the
translator's expenses. Their
vendors' approach is so that the product should speak for
itself as such without a nicely written manual, especially when it comes >>> to cheap products. They simply do not care.
But if it turns out that a good manual is important for increasing sales >>> then be sure there will be a good manual.
Products do not speak for themselves.
Products themselves are actually only half of what the customers want.
Usually manuals, software, warranties, repair service, parts supply,
service manuals, advertising of the brand, fashion or similar are also
part of what costumers want.
So: a good company would take care of their market and would provide
things like spare parts or installation services.
But China is doing mainly manufactoring and in many cases nothing more
than that and simple shipping stuff abroad in plastic bags.
Instead of a manual these manufacturers put tiny pieces of paper into the
box, which contain almost unreadable advices in five to ten different
languages.
Consumers may claim they want this and that, but what consumers
really want is what they are really willing to pay money for, so
as long as a product is well-sellable, there's no necessity to
take the vocalism (if any) of [some part of] consumers to heart.
If you dislike it then simply don't buy it. Developing theories
about inferiority of language and the like is surely not a good rationalization.
So, some sort of negotians are requried about would shall be delivered
and what is not necessary.
Most likely a good manual in the language of your country will a
standard for all products in the future.
On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 17:59:11 -0700, OrigInfoJunkie <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 6/15/2025 11:25 AM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 15/6/25 10:08, OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
Germany never had an atom bomb. The program was scuttled in 1942.
Nuclear fission was discoverred in Germany.
That's nice.
*discovered*, you fucking idiot ? only one fucking 'r'
Germany never mastered it.
Once that was established the question shifted from science to technology. >>
Exactly - but they didn't stop trying until allied forces overran all
their research facilities and captured their scientists.
Am Montag000016, 16.06.2025 um 18:46 schrieb The Starmaker:
...
You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want >>>>> Germany to posses nucluer weapons????
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
(what they told you in school was more or less a lie)
But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult to use >>>> and extremely expensive.
Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy has them, >>>> too, they are practically useless.
But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to.
Of course the Germans were the first to invent the atomic bomb...it
was invented by a German, living in Germany and his name was...Albert
Einstein.
he just continued his invention with his German friends in the USA!
Let's not forget real History...
it was Einstein who said:
"If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
E=m* c² was known before Einstein.
His formula for the atomic bomb was invented in 1905 in Germany!
Published in German!! Written in Geramn!!!
The Germans invented the fucking atomic bomb
...Einstein and his friendsLeo Szillar was actually an Hungarian and Einstein most like Swiss.
were those Germans!
Am Montag000016, 16.06.2025 um 18:46 schrieb The Starmaker:
...
You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want
Germany to posses nucluer weapons????
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
(what they told you in school was more or less a lie)
But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult to use >>> and extremely expensive.
Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy has them, >>> too, they are practically useless.
But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to.
Of course the Germans were the first to invent the atomic bomb...it
was invented by a German, living in Germany and his name was...Albert
Einstein.
he just continued his invention with his German friends in the USA!
Let's not forget real History...
it was Einstein who said:
"If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
E=m* c² was known before Einstein.
His formula for the atomic bomb was invented in 1905 in Germany!
Published in German!! Written in Geramn!!!
The Germans invented the fucking atomic bomb...Einstein and his friends were those Germans!
Leo Szillar was actually an Hungarian and Einstein most like Swiss.
Fermi was Italian and Bohr imho Danish.
TH
On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 10:07:22 +0200, Thomas Heger <[email protected]>
wrote:
Am Montag000016, 16.06.2025 um 18:46 schrieb The Starmaker:
...
You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want >>>>>> Germany to posses nucluer weapons????
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
(what they told you in school was more or less a lie)
But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult to use >>>>> and extremely expensive.
Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy has them, >>>>> too, they are practically useless.
But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to.
Of course the Germans were the first to invent the atomic bomb...it
was invented by a German, living in Germany and his name was...Albert
Einstein.
he just continued his invention with his German friends in the USA!
Let's not forget real History...
it was Einstein who said:
"If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
E=m* c² was known before Einstein.
Sure, right ... everybody knows that.
Cite, please.
His formula for the atomic bomb was invented in 1905 in Germany!Leo Szillar was actually an Hungarian and Einstein most like Swiss.
Published in German!! Written in Geramn!!!
The Germans invented the fucking atomic bomb...Einstein and his friends
were those Germans!
Fermi was Italian and Bohr imho Danish.
In your opinion? Was he Danish or not?
In sci.physics Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote:
Germany never mastered it.Exactly - but they didn't stop trying until allied forces overran all
their research facilities and captured their scientists.
Actually all his successes caused Hitler to believe circa 1940 that the
war would be over by 1941 and ordered research projects that couldn't be fielded by 1941 to be abandonded. A couple of years later reality set in
and projects were restarted.
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
(what they told you in school was more or less a lie)
On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 10:23:04 +0200, Thomas Heger <[email protected]>
wrote:
Apparently Einstein and Szillar wanted the atomic bombs to be dropped,
but not on Japan.
How ignorant are you?
These are results for einstein wanted a bomb dropped on germany
Search instead for einstein wanted abomb dropped on germany
AI Overview
No, Albert Einstein did not want an atomic bomb dropped on Germany.
While he did play a role in initiating the Manhattan Project to
develop the atomic bomb, it was motivated by his fear that Nazi
Germany would develop such a weapon first and use it to dominate the
world. Einstein, a lifelong pacifist, deeply regretted his involvement
later and described it as his "one great mistake".
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 10:23:04 +0200, Thomas Heger <[email protected]>
wrote:
Apparently Einstein and Szillar wanted the atomic bombs to be dropped,
but not on Japan.
How ignorant are you?
These are results for einstein wanted a bomb dropped on germany
Search instead for einstein wanted abomb dropped on germany
AI Overview
No, Albert Einstein did not want an atomic bomb dropped on Germany.
While he did play a role in initiating the Manhattan Project to
develop the atomic bomb, it was motivated by his fear that Nazi
Germany would develop such a weapon first and use it to dominate the
world. Einstein, a lifelong pacifist, deeply regretted his involvement
later and described it as his "one great mistake".
Einstein's other great mistake? The cosmological constant.
(A little physics humor)
Am Dienstag000017, 17.06.2025 um 09:58 schrieb The Starmaker:
...
He said: "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up
my
formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
"foreseen: to know in advance; be aware of beforehand; https://www.dictionary.com › browse › foreseen
verb (used with object)?? foresaw, foreseen, foreseeing. to have
prescience of; to know in advance;
The TRUTH is, Albert Einstein knew in advance; was aware of beforehand; that the atomic bomb
would be used on Japan.
The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan in August, 1945...twice. But Albert Einstein was
notified that the bomb would be dropped on Japan earlier that year in March.
And he never mentioned it to ANYONE between March and August...not even once!
Here is the memo Albert Einstein enclosed with his letter to FDR
notifying of the March decision.
https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1431098020930592777/photo/1
Apparently Einstein and Szillar wanted the atomic bombs to be dropped,
but not on Japan.
This would leave just one possible destination, which they apparently favored:
GERMANY!!
But, luckly for me and bad for Japan, war ended in Germany a little too
early (in the view of Einstein).
TH
Am Montag000016, 16.06.2025 um 18:46 schrieb The Starmaker:
...
You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want
Germany to posses nucluer weapons????
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
(what they told you in school was more or less a lie)
But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult to use >>> and extremely expensive.
Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy has them, >>> too, they are practically useless.
But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to.
Of course the Germans were the first to invent the atomic bomb...it
was invented by a German, living in Germany and his name was...Albert
Einstein.
he just continued his invention with his German friends in the USA!
Let's not forget real History...
it was Einstein who said:
"If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
E=m* c² was known before Einstein.
OrigInfoJunkie <[email protected]> wrote in
Germany never had an atom bomb. The program was scuttled in 1942.
Germany rejected the research done by
the top experts as "Jewish science" which
hindered their progress considerably.
On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 12:58:42 -0700, OrigInfoJunkie <[email protected]>
On 6/15/2025 6:03 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 10:08:17 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote:
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
If they had been, Hitler would have used them.
They didn't have an atomic bomb.
They didn't have an atomic bomb because Germany surrendered before
they could get one built.
The program was stopped in 1942, according to Albert Speer.
Then what were the Nazis were doing with heavy water in 1944?
The Norwegian ferry Hydro was sunk in Lake Tinnsjå (also known as Lake
Tinn) on February 20, 1944, by Norwegian resistance fighters.
"Norwegian heavy water sabotage" <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_heavy_water_sabotage>
"Heavy Water War - The story" <https://www.visitnorway.com/listings/heavy-water-war-the-story/1474/>
"Hitler's nuclear bomb dream was sunk on ferry" <https://www.9news.com.au/world/hitler-was-just-a-ferry-ride-away-from-building-his-nucelar-bomb-tv-show-reveals/cf96285a-9900-4b35-9b62-05c9e4f417f3>
But you believe Albert Speer.
ALBERT SPEER!!
<laughs and points>
Leo Szillar was actually an Hungarian and Einstein most like Swiss.
The Germans invented the fucking atomic bomb...Einstein and his friends
were those Germans!
Fermi was Italian and Bohr imho Danish.
TH
THIS IS INSANE!!!!
WHAT ARE ALL THESE FOREINERS DOING IN OUR COUNTRY BUILDING ATOMIC BOMBS????
they no even speeak inglish!
Thomas Heger wrote:
So, some sort of negotians are requried about would shall be delivered
and what is not necessary.
Most likely a good manual in the language of your country will a
standard for all products in the future.
I disagree, the local language is worse than english. They put things
upside down. Never read a paper or a manual in gearmon, full of errors and misinterpretations. Like jew Einstine who was a gypsy.
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
If they had been, Hitler would have used them.
They didn't have an atomic bomb.
They didn't have an atomic bomb because Germany surrendered before
they could get one built.
The program was stopped in 1942, according to Albert Speer.
Then what were the Nazis were doing with heavy water in 1944?
The Norwegian ferry Hydro was sunk in Lake Tinnsjå (also known as Lake >>>> Tinn) on February 20, 1944, by Norwegian resistance fighters.
"Norwegian heavy water sabotage"
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_heavy_water_sabotage>
"Heavy Water War - The story"
<https://www.visitnorway.com/listings/heavy-water-war-the-story/1474/> >>>>
"Hitler's nuclear bomb dream was sunk on ferry"
<https://www.9news.com.au/world/hitler-was-just-a-ferry-ride-away-from- >>>> building-his-nucelar-bomb-tv-show-reveals/cf96285a-9900-4b35-9b62-05c9e4f417f3>
If the Nazis needed heavy water, they apparently wanted to build a hydrogen bomb!
No. Heavy water was critical to the German atomic bomb project.
Don't bother. Heger is too busy being wrong to be teachable.
On 6/18/2025 1:07 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Montag000016, 16.06.2025 um 18:46 schrieb The Starmaker:
...
You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want >>>>>> Germany to posses nucluer weapons????
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
(what they told you in school was more or less a lie)
But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult to use >>>>> and extremely expensive.
Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy has
them,
too, they are practically useless.
But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to.
Of course the Germans were the first to invent the atomic bomb...it
was invented by a German, living in Germany and his name was...Albert
Einstein.
he just continued his invention with his German friends in the USA!
Let's not forget real History...
it was Einstein who said:
"If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
E=m* c² was known before Einstein.
Wrong.
His formula for the atomic bomb was invented in 1905 in Germany!
Published in German!! Written in Geramn!!!
The Germans invented the fucking atomic bomb
They did not.
...Einstein and his friendsLeo Szillar was actually an Hungarian and Einstein most like Swiss.
were those Germans!
Einstein was not born Swiss. He was a German Jew. He relinquished his
German citizenship in 1896. He acquired Swiss citizenship in 1901 at the
age of 21 (approaching age 22). He reacquired German (Prussian)
citizenship in 1914, but later renounced it again.
"Developments took place in several phases,
but in the words of historian Mark Walker, it
ultimately became "frozen at the laboratory
level" with the "modest goal" to "build a
nuclear reactor which could sustain a nuclear
fission chain reaction for a significant amount
of time and to achieve the complete separation
of at least tiny amounts of the uranium isotopes".
The scholarly consensus is that it failed to
achieve these goals, and that despite fears at
the time, the Germans had never been close to
producing nuclear weapons."
Puffing and fluffing it up makes good copy.
Somewheres I got a book on the Japanese program
(couple boxes in the back room most likely). They
were even further away.
What would you do with heavy water in Uranium bombs?
And what use would you have for a fast breading reactor, if you
don't want to create Plutonium?
But supposed Plutonium was actually created at that time, then
also heavy water for a hydrogen bomb would make some sense.
Also unusual: Einstein denounced German citizenship without
acquiring any other. This is illegal in Germany. I actually don't
know, whether or not that was illegal in the former German
Empire, too, but would guess that wasn't allowed then neither.
Am Dienstag000017, 17.06.2025 um 15:25 schrieb Oleg Smirnov:
If you dislike it then simply don't buy it. Developing theories
about inferiority of language and the like is surely not a good
rationalization.
I personally think, that the Chineese themselves are not really happy with their language and their way of writing.
These are very nasty problems, once you want to go into international
trade.
Costumers usually want all things possible and for zero price.
But that is't possible, of course.
So, some sort of negotians are requried about would shall be delivered and what is not necessary.
Most likely a good manual in the language of your country will a standard
for all products in the future.
On 18/6/25 12:41, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 10:23:04 +0200, Thomas Heger <[email protected]>
wrote:
Apparently Einstein and Szillar wanted the atomic bombs to be dropped, >>>> but not on Japan.
How ignorant are you?
These are results for einstein wanted a bomb dropped on germany
Search instead for einstein wanted abomb dropped on germany
AI Overview
No, Albert Einstein did not want an atomic bomb dropped on Germany.
While he did play a role in initiating the Manhattan Project to
develop the atomic bomb, it was motivated by his fear that Nazi
Germany would develop such a weapon first and use it to dominate the
world. Einstein, a lifelong pacifist, deeply regretted his involvement
later and described it as his "one great mistake".
Einstein's other great mistake? The cosmological constant.
(A little physics humor)
Has that not been changed to the cosmological variable? The
cosmological fudge factor?
Am Mittwoch000018, 18.06.2025 um 18:55 schrieb Governor Swill:
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
If they had been, Hitler would have used them.
They didn't have an atomic bomb.
They didn't have an atomic bomb because Germany surrendered before
they could get one built.
The program was stopped in 1942, according to Albert Speer.
Then what were the Nazis were doing with heavy water in 1944?
The Norwegian ferry Hydro was sunk in Lake Tinnsjå (also known as Lake >>>>> Tinn) on February 20, 1944, by Norwegian resistance fighters.
"Norwegian heavy water sabotage"
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_heavy_water_sabotage>
"Heavy Water War - The story"
<https://www.visitnorway.com/listings/heavy-water-war-the-story/1474/> >>>>>
"Hitler's nuclear bomb dream was sunk on ferry"
<https://www.9news.com.au/world/hitler-was-just-a-ferry-ride-away-from- >>>>> building-his-nucelar-bomb-tv-show-reveals/
cf96285a-9900-4b35-9b62-05c9e4f417f3>
If the Nazis needed heavy water, they apparently wanted to build a hydrogen
bomb!
No. Heavy water was critical to the German atomic bomb project.
Don't bother. Heger is too busy being wrong to be teachable.
What would you do with heavy water in Uranium bombs?
On 6/19/2025 4:12 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Siri Cruz wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On 18/6/25 12:41, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 10:23:04 +0200, Thomas Heger
<[email protected]>
wrote:
Apparently Einstein and Szillar wanted the atomic bombs to
be dropped,
but not on Japan.
How ignorant are you?
These are results for einstein wanted a bomb dropped on germany
Search instead for einstein wanted abomb dropped on germany
AI Overview
No, Albert Einstein did not want an atomic bomb dropped on
Germany.
While he did play a role in initiating the Manhattan Project to
develop the atomic bomb, it was motivated by his fear that Nazi
Germany would develop such a weapon first and use it to
dominate the
world. Einstein, a lifelong pacifist, deeply regretted his
involvement
later and described it as his "one great mistake".
Einstein's other great mistake? The cosmological constant.
(A little physics humor)
Has that not been changed to the cosmological variable? The
cosmological fudge factor?
I dunno. It's a dark matter.
;^D
On 18/6/25 21:41, Gronk wrote:
"Developments took place in several phases,
but in the words of historian Mark Walker, it
ultimately became "frozen at the laboratory
level" with the "modest goal" to "build a
nuclear reactor which could sustain a nuclear
fission chain reaction for a significant amount
Nuclear reactors need a device to slow down neutrons so that the chain reaction is sustains at a low power. Weapons do not slow down neutrons.
They sustain the reaction at a high power that cannot be contained.
One way to slow down neutrons is let them bounce off heavy water
molecules. Another is bounce off carbon atoms in graphite. In 1943
graphite was contaminated with boron which removed neutrons altogether.
So Germans decided to use heavy water which they became fixated on. They never could get enough so they never had any reactor or self-sustaining
chain reaction. Fermi and Americans realised they could clean boron out
of graphite. Fermi got the first reactor running in 1943. They built
more reactors; they discoverred a new element in the reactor ash which
led to breeder reactors and Plutonium as a fissile metal along with
U235. Plutonium could be refined with chemistry.
of time and to achieve the complete separation
of at least tiny amounts of the uranium isotopes".
All Uranium isotopes have the same chemistry so it requires very
expensive methods depending on slightly different nucleus weights. It requires a lot of electricity, space, and machinery. Only the USA could afford this whilst fighting a war.
The scholarly consensus is that it failed to
achieve these goals, and that despite fears at
Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs.
On 6/19/2025 12:58 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Mittwoch000018, 18.06.2025 um 18:30 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
On 6/18/2025 1:07 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Montag000016, 16.06.2025 um 18:46 schrieb The Starmaker:
...
Of course the Germans were the first to invent the atomic bomb...it >>>>>> was invented by a German, living in Germany and his name was...Albert >>>>>> Einstein.
You're German? Can you explain to me why Israel today doesn't want >>>>>>>> Germany to posses nucluer weapons????
Atomic bombs were actually invented in Germany.
(what they told you in school was more or less a lie)
But Germans don't like atomic bombs, because they are difficult
to use
and extremely expensive.
Actually atomic bombs cannot be used properly and if the enemy
has them,
too, they are practically useless.
But Germans could most likely build them, supposed they wanted to. >>>>>>
he just continued his invention with his German friends in the USA! >>>>>
Let's not forget real History...
it was Einstein who said:
"If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
E=m* c² was known before Einstein.
Wrong.
His formula for the atomic bomb was invented in 1905 in Germany!
Published in German!! Written in Geramn!!!
The Germans invented the fucking atomic bomb
They did not.
...Einstein and his friendsLeo Szillar was actually an Hungarian and Einstein most like Swiss.
were those Germans!
Einstein was not born Swiss. He was a German Jew. He relinquished his
German citizenship in 1896. He acquired Swiss citizenship in 1901 at
the age of 21 (approaching age 22). He reacquired German (Prussian)
citizenship in 1914, but later renounced it again.
The is the official CV, but i had doubts about its authenticity.
You have no valid reason to doubt it.
Also unusual: Einstein denounced German citizenship without
acquiring any other. This is illegal in Germany. I actually don't
know, whether or not that was illegal in the former German
Empire, too, but would guess that wasn't allowed then neither.
I can renounce my US citizenship. The US would not recognise that
because I am still in the US and they can exercise their jurisdiction
over me. If I first move to Bali, the US cannot do anything to me, so
their opinion of legality is irrelevant.
Unless Germany was going to charge into Italy or Switzerland, what they decided was illegal was unenforceable.
For instance Einstein spoke all three main languages of Switzerland
(French, Italian and German) while failed to learn proper English after
ten years in the USA.
But if Einstein wasn't German, we could actually also assume, that his
name wasn't 'Einstein' and possibly he wasn't even a Jew.
Am Donnerstag000019, 19.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb Siri Cruz:
I can renounce my US citizenship. The US would not recognise thatBut in some cases emigration was allowed, but most likely not by
because I am still in the US and they can exercise their jurisdiction
over me. If I first move to Bali, the US cannot do anything to me, so
their opinion of legality is irrelevant.
teenagers.
But in case of Einstein we had also the issue of WWI and whether or not
it was possible to evade drafting by going to Italy.
If it were illegal, than Einstein would have been a 'draft dodger' and
would have been imprisoned once going back to Germany.
Am Donnerstag000019, 19.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb Siri Cruz:
Also unusual: Einstein denounced German citizenship without
acquiring any other. This is illegal in Germany. I actually don't
know, whether or not that was illegal in the former German
Empire, too, but would guess that wasn't allowed then neither.
I can renounce my US citizenship. The US would not recognise that because I am
still in the US and they can exercise their jurisdiction over me. If I first >> move to Bali, the US cannot do anything to me, so their opinion of legality is
irrelevant.
Unless Germany was going to charge into Italy or Switzerland, what they
decided was illegal was unenforceable.
The concepts about citizenship were different in Germany (compared to the USA).
Actually the German empire was a monarchy and
Am Donnerstag000019, 19.06.2025 um 10:07 schrieb Siri Cruz:
On 18/6/25 21:41, Gronk wrote:
"Developments took place in several phases,
but in the words of historian Mark Walker, it
ultimately became "frozen at the laboratory
level" with the "modest goal" to "build a
nuclear reactor which could sustain a nuclear
fission chain reaction for a significant amount
Nuclear reactors need a device to slow down neutrons so that the chain
reaction is sustains at a low power. Weapons do not slow down neutrons. They >> sustain the reaction at a high power that cannot be contained.
One way to slow down neutrons is let them bounce off heavy water molecules. >> Another is bounce off carbon atoms in graphite. In 1943 graphite was
contaminated with boron which removed neutrons altogether. So Germans decided
to use heavy water which they became fixated on. They never could get enough >> so they never had any reactor or self-sustaining chain reaction. Fermi and >> Americans realised they could clean boron out of graphite. Fermi got the first
reactor running in 1943. They built more reactors; they discoverred a new
element in the reactor ash which led to breeder reactors and Plutonium as a >> fissile metal along with U235. Plutonium could be refined with chemistry.
of time and to achieve the complete separation
of at least tiny amounts of the uranium isotopes".
All Uranium isotopes have the same chemistry so it requires very expensive >> methods depending on slightly different nucleus weights. It requires a lot of
electricity, space, and machinery. Only the USA could afford this whilst
fighting a war.
The scholarly consensus is that it failed to
achieve these goals, and that despite fears at
Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just scholarly
consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved Germany had no
functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs.
sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them.
On 6/20/2025 12:00 PM, OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
On 6/20/2025 12:17 AM, Thomas Heger gelogen:
Am Donnerstag000019, 19.06.2025 um 10:07 schrieb Siri Cruz:
On 18/6/25 21:41, Gronk wrote:
"Developments took place in several phases,
but in the words of historian Mark Walker, it
ultimately became "frozen at the laboratory
level" with the "modest goal" to "build a
nuclear reactor which could sustain a nuclear
fission chain reaction for a significant amount
Nuclear reactors need a device to slow down neutrons so that the chain >>>> reaction is sustains at a low power. Weapons do not slow down neutrons. They
sustain the reaction at a high power that cannot be contained.
One way to slow down neutrons is let them bounce off heavy water molecules.
Another is bounce off carbon atoms in graphite. In 1943 graphite was
contaminated with boron which removed neutrons altogether. So Germans
decided to use heavy water which they became fixated on. They never could >>>> get enough so they never had any reactor or self-sustaining chain reaction.
Fermi and Americans realised they could clean boron out of graphite. Fermi >>>> got the first reactor running in 1943. They built more reactors; they
discoverred a new element in the reactor ash which led to breeder reactors >>>> and Plutonium as a fissile metal along with U235. Plutonium could be refined
with chemistry.
of time and to achieve the complete separation
of at least tiny amounts of the uranium isotopes".
All Uranium isotopes have the same chemistry so it requires very expensive >>>> methods depending on slightly different nucleus weights. It requires a lot >>>> of electricity, space, and machinery. Only the USA could afford this whilst
fighting a war.
The scholarly consensus is that it failed to
achieve these goals, and that despite fears at
Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just scholarly
consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved Germany had no >>>> functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs.
sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them.
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you fucking Lügner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one or two from
North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.
Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes!
sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for
them.
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one,
you fucking Lügner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o
Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes!
On 6/20/2025 12:26 AM, Thomas Heger gelogen:
Am Donnerstag000019, 19.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb Siri Cruz:
Also unusual: Einstein denounced German citizenship without
acquiring any other. This is illegal in Germany. I actually don't
know, whether or not that was illegal in the former German
Empire, too, but would guess that wasn't allowed then neither.
I can renounce my US citizenship. The US would not recognise that
because I am still in the US and they can exercise their jurisdiction
over me. If I first move to Bali, the US cannot do anything to me, so
their opinion of legality is irrelevant.
Unless Germany was going to charge into Italy or Switzerland, what
they decided was illegal was unenforceable.
The concepts about citizenship were different in Germany (compared to
the USA).
At that time, Germans were born as subjects, not citizens.
Actually the German empire was a monarchy and
Actually, Germany was several monarchies and duchies at that time, you
stupid fucking Lügner. Einstein was born a subject of the kingdom of Württemberg, part of the German empire. For six years beginning in 1895
he was stateless. He became a citizen of Switzerland in 1901 at age 21.
This makes a complete joke of your lie that he was Swiss at birth. He
became a German citizen/subject again in 1914, this time as a subject of
the kingdom of Prussia, without renouncing his Swiss citizenship.
When you say you have "doubts" about this history of Einstein's
citizenship, you're just bullshitting. You have no valid reason to have
any such "doubts," you fucking Lügner.
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis
have actually built atomic bombs.
The scholarly consensus is that it failed to
achieve these goals, and that despite fears at
Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just
scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved
Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs.
sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them.
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you
fucking Lügner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one or
two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.
The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.
This is especially important, because if any of Einstein's
stations in his CV ware actually fabricated, than everything else
would be questionable, too.
Am Freitag000020, 20.06.2025 um 21:40 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
...
The scholarly consensus is that it failed to
achieve these goals, and that despite fears at
Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just scholarly >>>>>> consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved Germany had no >>>>>> functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs.
sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them.
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you fucking >>>> Lügner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one or two >>> from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.
The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an atomic bomb.
It's a lie. They did not.
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have actually built atomic bombs.
But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not been bornThey never built an atomic bomb. You're just fucking around, stupidly.
then.
So, well, yes, maybe...
...possibly the Nazis had in fact no a-bombs.
(possibly they had...)
On 21/6/25 0:22, Thomas Heger wrote:
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis
have actually built atomic bombs.
If Call of Duty says so, it must be true.
On 6/21/2025 12:22 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000020, 20.06.2025 um 21:40 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
...
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, youThe scholarly consensus is that it failed to
achieve these goals, and that despite fears at
Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just
scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved >>>>>>> Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs. >>>>>>>
sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them. >>>>>
fucking Lügner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one
or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.
The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an
atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
actually built atomic bombs.
They did not.
Am Samstag000021, 21.06.2025 um 09:50 schrieb Siri Cruz:
On 21/6/25 0:22, Thomas Heger wrote:
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis
have actually built atomic bombs.
If Call of Duty says so, it must be true.
The Computer was just invented in the era of the Nazis (actually in
Germany by Konrad Zuse).
Well, possibly you were correct.
But how could you possibly know?
Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold
them to the USA.
'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational' behavior, since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.
(BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)
Thomas Heger wrote:
Well, possibly you were correct.
But how could you possibly know?
Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold
them to the USA.
'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational' behavior, since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.
(BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)
Now tell us how Germany made the first jet fighter.
Am Samstag000021, 21.06.2025 um 09:50 schrieb Siri Cruz:
On 21/6/25 0:22, Thomas Heger wrote:
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis
have actually built atomic bombs.
If Call of Duty says so, it must be true.
The Computer was just invented in the era of the Nazis (actually in Germany by
Konrad Zuse).
I lived in Germany for 18 months 40 years ago, and I never met a German
as stupid and as big a Lügner as you. You seem to be working at being stupid, but your being a Lügner just shows bad character. I think it's
the only thing at which you've succeeded in your worthless Leben.
Am Samstag000021, 21.06.2025 um 18:19 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
On 6/21/2025 12:22 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000020, 20.06.2025 um 21:40 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
...
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you fucking >>>>>> Lügner.The scholarly consensus is that it failed to
achieve these goals, and that despite fears at
Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just scholarly >>>>>>>> consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved Germany had no >>>>>>>> functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs.
sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them. >>>>>>
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one or two
from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.
The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an atomic >>>> bomb. It's a lie. They did not.
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have actually
built atomic bombs.
They did not.
Well, possibly you were correct.
But how could you possibly know?
Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold them to the USA.
On 6/24/2025 3:09 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Samstag000021, 21.06.2025 um 09:50 schrieb Siri Cruz:
On 21/6/25 0:22, Thomas Heger wrote:
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis
have actually built atomic bombs.
If Call of Duty says so, it must be true.
The Computer was just invented in the era of the Nazis (actually in
Germany by Konrad Zuse).
No, you stupid fucking Lügner, the first computer was not invented in Germany.
OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
On 6/24/2025 3:09 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Samstag000021, 21.06.2025 um 09:50 schrieb Siri Cruz:
On 21/6/25 0:22, Thomas Heger wrote:
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis
have actually built atomic bombs.
If Call of Duty says so, it must be true.
The Computer was just invented in the era of the Nazis (actually in
Germany by Konrad Zuse).
No, you stupid fucking Lügner, the first computer was not invented in
Germany.
It was. Z1 was more electro-mechanical calculator. More versions were
built with the Z3 being the first programmable computer.
The US built the Eniac in 1945 was another programmable computer.
UK made a number of electro-mechanical computing device for cipher
breaking and the Colossus computer. It was kept secret and unknown for
thirty years as UK ceded business computers to the USA.
Zuse and the USA continued after the war.
Thomas Heger wrote:
Well, possibly you were correct.
But how could you possibly know?
Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold
them to the USA.
'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational' behavior,
since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.
(BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)
Now tell us how Germany made the first jet fighter.
The Gloster Meteor does ot count.
On 6/24/2025 3:09 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Samstag000021, 21.06.2025 um 09:50 schrieb Siri Cruz:
On 21/6/25 0:22, Thomas Heger wrote:
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis
have actually built atomic bombs.
If Call of Duty says so, it must be true.
The Computer was just invented in the era of the Nazis (actually in
Germany by Konrad Zuse).
No, you stupid fucking Lügner, the first computer was not invented in Germany.
Am Dienstag000024, 24.06.2025 um 12:28 schrieb chine.bleu:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Well, possibly you were correct.
But how could you possibly know?
Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold
them to the USA.
'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational' behavior, >>> since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.
(BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)
Now tell us how Germany made the first jet fighter.
The Gloster Meteor does ot count.
There existed a number of Jet-fighters in Germany at the end of WWII.
But I certainly cannot tell you, how they were made, because I wasn't
even born then.
But you may have a look at this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mwga3crerJc
TH
Am Mittwoch000025, 25.06.2025 um 18:41 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:We're talking about modern electronic computers, not mechanical computing machines.
On 6/24/2025 3:09 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Samstag000021, 21.06.2025 um 09:50 schrieb Siri Cruz:
On 21/6/25 0:22, Thomas Heger wrote:
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis
have actually built atomic bombs.
If Call of Duty says so, it must be true.
The Computer was just invented in the era of the Nazis (actually in Germany >>> by Konrad Zuse).
No, you stupid fucking Lügner, the first computer was not invented in Germany.
Well, actually 'computers' were invented much earlier, like the ones by Leibnitz
or Pascal:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascaline
Am Dienstag000024, 24.06.2025 um 12:28 schrieb chine.bleu:There were *two* operational models of jet fighter in Germany at the end of WWII, the Me 262 and the Heinkel He 162. The latter was a piece of crap, made mostly of wood. The Me 262 was decent, but the collapsing Luftwaffe had a hard time keeping them in the air.
Thomas Heger wrote:
Well, possibly you were correct.
But how could you possibly know?
Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold
them to the USA.
'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational' behavior, >>> since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.
(BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)
Now tell us how Germany made the first jet fighter.
The Gloster Meteor does ot count.
There existed a number of Jet-fighters in Germany at the end of WWII.
On 6/26/2025 10:39 PM, Thomas Heger gelogen:
Am Dienstag000024, 24.06.2025 um 12:28 schrieb chine.bleu:There were *two* operational models of jet fighter in Germany at the end
Thomas Heger wrote:
Well, possibly you were correct.
But how could you possibly know?
Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold
them to the USA.
'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational'
behavior,
since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.
(BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)
Now tell us how Germany made the first jet fighter.
The Gloster Meteor does ot count.
There existed a number of Jet-fighters in Germany at the end of WWII.
of WWII, the Me 262 and the Heinkel He 162. The latter was a piece of
crap, made mostly of wood. The Me 262 was decent, but the collapsing Luftwaffe had a hard time keeping them in the air.
OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
On 6/26/2025 10:39 PM, Thomas Heger gelogen:
Am Dienstag000024, 24.06.2025 um 12:28 schrieb chine.bleu:There were *two* operational models of jet fighter in Germany at the end
Thomas Heger wrote:
Well, possibly you were correct.
But how could you possibly know?
Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold >>>>> them to the USA.
'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational'
behavior,
since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.
(BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)
Now tell us how Germany made the first jet fighter.
The Gloster Meteor does ot count.
There existed a number of Jet-fighters in Germany at the end of WWII.
of WWII, the Me 262 and the Heinkel He 162. The latter was a piece of
crap, made mostly of wood. The Me 262 was decent, but the collapsing
Luftwaffe had a hard time keeping them in the air.
German jet engines lasted about ten hours before becoming scrap metal.
British jet engines lasted much longer, German industry could not build replacement engines fast enough to keep jets in operation.
I vaguely remembered something about that. I did a Google search on
"were jet engines for me 262 unreliable" and the Google AI Overview
answer reads:
Yes, the Junkers Jumo 004 engines powering the Me 262 were a
significant
source of unreliability during World War II. These early jet engines
had a
limited lifespan, typically requiring major overhauls after just
10-25 hours
of operation. This unreliability, combined with shortages of strategic
materials and fuel, hampered the Me 262's operational effectiveness.
British jet engines lasted much longer, German industry could not
build replacement engines fast enough to keep jets in operation.
Sounds about right.
Interesting that even as late as the 1940s, British inventors were still ahead of the U.S.
We're talking about modern electronic computers, not mechanicalThere have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis
have actually built atomic bombs.
If Call of Duty says so, it must be true.
The Computer was just invented in the era of the Nazis (actually in
Germany by Konrad Zuse).
No, you stupid fucking Lügner, the first computer was not invented in
Germany.
Well, actually 'computers' were invented much earlier, like the ones
by Leibnitz or Pascal:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascaline
computing machines.
Sounds about right.This was changed significantly by 'operation paperclip'.
Interesting that even as late as the 1940s, British inventors were
still ahead of the U.S.
In this operation the US forces roamed through Germany and captured
every interesting scientist and brought them to the USA.
They also plundered thousands of patents.
On 6/27/2025 10:16 AM, chine.bleu wrote:
OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
On 6/26/2025 10:39 PM, Thomas Heger gelogen:
There were *two* operational models of jet fighter in Germany at the end >>> of WWII, the Me 262 and the Heinkel He 162. The latter was a piece ofPossibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold >>>>>> them to the USA.
'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational'
behavior,
since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.
(BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)
Now tell us how Germany made the first jet fighter.
The Gloster Meteor does ot count.
There existed a number of Jet-fighters in Germany at the end of WWII.
crap, made mostly of wood. The Me 262 was decent, but the collapsing
Luftwaffe had a hard time keeping them in the air.
German jet engines lasted about ten hours before becoming scrap metal.
I vaguely remembered something about that. I did a Google search on
"were jet engines for me 262 unreliable" and the Google AI Overview
answer reads:
Yes, the Junkers Jumo 004 engines powering the Me 262 were a significant
source of unreliability during World War II. These early jet engines had a
limited lifespan, typically requiring major overhauls after just
10-25 hours
of operation. This unreliability, combined with shortages of strategic
materials and fuel, hampered the Me 262's operational effectiveness.
British jet engines lasted much longer, German industry could not
build replacement engines fast enough to keep jets in operation.
Sounds about right.
Interesting that even as late as the 1940s, British inventors were still ahead of the U.S.
This was changed significantly by 'operation paperclip'.
In this operation the US forces roamed through Germany and captured
every interesting scientist and brought them to the USA.
Am Dienstag000024, 24.06.2025 um 12:28 schrieb chine.bleu:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Well, possibly you were correct.
But how could you possibly know?
Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold
them to the USA.
'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational' behavior, >>> since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.
(BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)
Now tell us how Germany made the first jet fighter.
The Gloster Meteor does ot count.
There existed a number of Jet-fighters in Germany at the end of WWII.
But I certainly cannot tell you, how they were made, because I wasn't
even born then.
But you may have a look at this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mwga3crerJc
Am Freitag000020, 20.06.2025 um 21:40 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them.The scholarly consensus is that it failed to
achieve these goals, and that despite fears at
Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just
scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved
Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs. >>>>>>
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you
fucking Lügner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one
or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.
The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an
atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
actually built atomic bombs.
But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not
been born then.
So, well, yes, maybe...No. Not even close.
...possibly the Nazis had in fact no a-bombs.
(possibly they had...)
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, youAllied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not justsure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them. >>>>>
scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved >>>>>>> Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs. >>>>>>>
fucking Lügner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one
or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.
The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an
atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
actually built atomic bombs.
But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not
been born then.
That's what history and historians are for.
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Dienstag000024, 24.06.2025 um 12:28 schrieb chine.bleu:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Well, possibly you were correct.
But how could you possibly know?
Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold
them to the USA.
'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational'
behavior,
since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.
(BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)
Now tell us how Germany made the first jet fighter.
The Gloster Meteor does ot count.
There existed a number of Jet-fighters in Germany at the end of WWII.
But I certainly cannot tell you, how they were made, because I wasn't
even born then.
Yes you can, you even provide a youtube link.
But you may have a look at this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mwga3crerJc
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000020, 20.06.2025 um 21:40 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie:
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, yousure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them. >>>>>The scholarly consensus is that it failed to
achieve these goals, and that despite fears at
Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just
scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved >>>>>>> Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs. >>>>>>>
fucking Lügner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one
or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.
The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an
atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
actually built atomic bombs.
But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not
been born then.
That's what history and historians are for.
So, well, yes, maybe...No. Not even close.
...possibly the Nazis had in fact no a-bombs.
(possibly they had...)
Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:
Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not justsure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for
scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes
proved Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and >>>>>>>> no bombs.
them.
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you
fucking Lügner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.
The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an
atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
actually built atomic bombs.
But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not
been born then.
That's what history and historians are for.
Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because
Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).
So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).
TH
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:
Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not justsure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>>>> them.
scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes
proved Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and >>>>>>>>> no bombs.
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you >>>>>>> fucking Lügner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.
The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an
atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
actually built atomic bombs.
But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not
been born then.
That's what history and historians are for.
Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because
Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).
The phrase "History is written by the victors" predates Churchill's
birth by decades.
Churchill is quoted as saying it in a movie, which apparently is seen as
a reliable source by some. To reject historians as a source and accept
movies which are avowedly fictional is well into crackpot territory.
Indeed it was Goring who said:
“Der Sieger wird immer der Richter und der Besiegte stets der Angeklagte sein,”
Only after he lost, though.
Churchill did frequently joke that judgement should be left to history, "particularly as I intend to write that history myself", a reference to
his extensive output as a writer.
Thomas Heger <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:
Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not justsure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>>> them.
scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes
proved Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and >>>>>>>> no bombs.
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you >>>>>> fucking LÃπgner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.
The LÃπgner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an
atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
actually built atomic bombs.
But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not
been born then.
That's what history and historians are for.
Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because
Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).
So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).
TH
Churchill was so confident of reelection
in 1945 that he didn't bother campaigning, he
never got over that rebuke.
On Jul 16, 2025, J. J. Lodder wrote
(in article<1rfi9gn.1imbhyt13uwdmmN%[email protected]>):
Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> wrote:
Thomas Heger <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:
Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved Germany had no functionning reactors,sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American
no enrichment, and no bombs.
searched for them.
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed
one, you fucking LÃπgner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of
purchased one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.
The LÃπgner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have actually built atomic bombs.
But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not
been born then.
That's what history and historians are for.
Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).
So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).
TH
Churchill was so confident of reelection
in 1945 that he didn't bother campaigning, he
never got over that rebuke.
Churchill was already beginning to dement during WWII.
Being badly alcholic didn't help either.
Fortunately whe had Roosevelt to bring things to a happy ending.
Jan
As if FDR didn't have his own problems...He sat idly by while Churchill and Stalin divvied up Europe into spheres of influence.
Brian Ehni <[email protected]> wrote:
On Jul 16, 2025, J. J. Lodder wrote
(in article<1rfi9gn.1imbhyt13uwdmmN%[email protected]>):
Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> wrote:
Thomas Heger <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:
Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not >>>>>>>>>>>> just scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our >>>>>>>>>>>> own eyes proved Germany had no functionning reactors,sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American
no enrichment, and no bombs.
searched for them.
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed
one, you fucking LÃπgner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of
purchased one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.
The LÃπgner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed >>>>>>>> an atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have >>>>>>> actually built atomic bombs.
But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not >>>>>>> been born then.
That's what history and historians are for.
Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because
Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).
So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).
TH
Churchill was so confident of reelection
in 1945 that he didn't bother campaigning, he
never got over that rebuke.
Churchill was already beginning to dement during WWII.
Being badly alcholic didn't help either.
Fortunately whe had Roosevelt to bring things to a happy ending.
Jan
As if FDR didn't have his own problems...He sat idly by while Churchill and >> Stalin divvied up Europe into spheres of influence.
If it had been up to Churchill there would have been nothing to divide.
All of Europe would have been for Stalin.
It was Roosevelt who forced the Normandy invasion.
We Europeans have been lucky. For a while the Americans (read FDR)
were so fed up with British hesitations and delaying tactics
that they seriously considered giving up on Europe.
(and doing Japan first)
You may want to have a look at
Nigel Hamilton, Commander In Chief: FDR's Battle with Churchill, 1943
(FDR at War Book 2)
There is also a good review of it at Amazon.
Brian Ehni <[email protected]> wrote:
On Jul 16, 2025, J. J. Lodder wrote
(in article<1rfi9gn.1imbhyt13uwdmmN%[email protected]>):
Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> wrote:
Thomas Heger <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:
Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not >>>>>>>>>>>> just scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our >>>>>>>>>>>> own eyes proved Germany had no functionning reactors,sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American
no enrichment, and no bombs.
searched for them.
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed
one, you fucking LÃπgner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of
purchased one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.
The LÃπgner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed >>>>>>>> an atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have >>>>>>> actually built atomic bombs.
But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not >>>>>>> been born then.
That's what history and historians are for.
Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because
Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).
So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).
TH
Churchill was so confident of reelection
in 1945 that he didn't bother campaigning, he
never got over that rebuke.
Churchill was already beginning to dement during WWII.
Being badly alcholic didn't help either.
Fortunately whe had Roosevelt to bring things to a happy ending.
Jan
As if FDR didn't have his own problems...He sat idly by while Churchill and >> Stalin divvied up Europe into spheres of influence.
If it had been up to Churchill there would have been nothing to divide.
All of Europe would have been for Stalin.
It was Roosevelt who forced the Normandy invasion
On 7/17/2025 10:16 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Brian Ehni <[email protected]> wrote:
On Jul 16, 2025, J. J. Lodder wrote
(in article<1rfi9gn.1imbhyt13uwdmmN%[email protected]>):
Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> wrote:
Thomas Heger <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:
The LÃπgner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed >>>>>>>> an atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not >>>>>>>>>>>> just scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our >>>>>>>>>>>> own eyes proved Germany had no functionning reactors, >>>>>>>>>>>> no enrichment, and no bombs.sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American
searched for them.
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed
one, you fucking LÃπgner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of
purchased one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. >>>>>>>>
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have >>>>>>> actually built atomic bombs.
But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not >>>>>>> been born then.
That's what history and historians are for.
Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because
Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).
So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).
TH
Churchill was so confident of reelection
in 1945 that he didn't bother campaigning, he
never got over that rebuke.
Churchill was already beginning to dement during WWII.
Being badly alcholic didn't help either.
Fortunately whe had Roosevelt to bring things to a happy ending.
Jan
As if FDR didn't have his own problems...He sat idly by while Churchill and
Stalin divvied up Europe into spheres of influence.
If it had been up to Churchill there would have been nothing to divide.
All of Europe would have been for Stalin.
It was Roosevelt who forced the Normandy invasion
For kiddies - Churchill's alternative were Balkans.
Unacceptable for Stalin, obviously.
Maciej Wo?niak <[email protected]> wrote:
For kiddies - Churchill's alternative were Balkans.
Yes, incredibly stupid. The real motivation was fear of a real invasion.
The Balkans by themselves are bad enough for making real progress.
Even supposing the Allies could have made some headway there it would
have been practically impossible to cross the Alps.
You may want to have a look atThe entire lead up to the war was a mess of UK and European mistakes.
Nigel Hamilton, Commander In Chief: FDR's Battle with Churchill, 1943
(FDR at War Book 2)
There is also a good review of it at Amazon.
Churchill all but begged FDR for help. As for delays, FDR was the
master of them, never committing American troops or resources until
others had done the heavy lifting. Stalin begged them to open a
western front but FDR and Churchill both knew that getting in a rush
would lead to failure. They took their time, they prepared carefully
and allowed Russia to take the brunt of Hitler's wrath and weaken his
western front before attacking in France.
On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:
UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They
tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany
would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not
until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The
losses of the USSR are solely his fault.
That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did >not help.
I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the
political level it is all Stalin.
Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool.
On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:
UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They
tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany
would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not
until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The
losses of the USSR are solely his fault.
That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did >>> not help.
I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the
political level it is all Stalin.
Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool.
yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war.[...]
War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it
destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as
in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter
what? Cough/...
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:[...]
On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:
UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They >>>>> tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany >>>>> would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not
until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The
losses of the USSR are solely his fault.
That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did >>>>> not help.
I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the
political level it is all Stalin.
Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool.
yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war.
War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it
destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as
in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter
what? Cough/...
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit
killed by an asteroid.
NEVER.
the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit
killed by an asteroid.
NEVER.
I think that you are not an AI programmed to change the subject
at this point. Anyway there was a short article in Sky and
Telescope about 20 or so years ago about a boy in Africa who was
struck by a meteorite at the time who lived after being struck
by it. I am not going to bother to try to dig it up for you.
On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:[...]
On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:
UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They >>>>> tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany >>>>> would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not >>>>> until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The >>>>> losses of the USSR are solely his fault.
That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did
not help.
I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the
political level it is all Stalin.
Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool.
yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war.
War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it
destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as
in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter
what? Cough/...
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit killed by an asteroid.
NEVER.
How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
result of its impact?
How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
result of its impact?
The Tunguska event is supposed to have killed one human,
at 30 km away. (blown 12 meter up into a tree)
It no doubt killed large numbers of animals.
Such an event in an inhabited region could easily kill thousands,
if not millions of humans.
The yield has been estimated at about 10 Megaton equivalent,
x wrote:
the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit
killed by an asteroid.
NEVER.
I think that you are not an AI programmed to change the subject
at this point. Anyway there was a short article in Sky and
Telescope about 20 or so years ago about a boy in Africa who was
struck by a meteorite at the time who lived after being struck
by it. I am not going to bother to try to dig it up for you.
Asteroid hits are extremely rare. I doubt we have been around long
enough. Meteors hit every year making a bad interaction much more
probable. So let us confuse everything because we are too far gone for rational exchange.
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:[...]
On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:
UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They >>>>>>> tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany >>>>>>> would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not >>>>>>> until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The >>>>>>> losses of the USSR are solely his fault.
That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did
not help.
I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the
political level it is all Stalin.
Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool.
yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war.
War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it
destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as >>>> in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter
what? Cough/...
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit
killed by an asteroid.
NEVER.
How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
result of its impact?
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!
In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
has EVER been killed by an asteroid!
Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...
When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????
On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:[...]
On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:
UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They >>>>> tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany >>>>> would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not >>>>> until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The >>>>> losses of the USSR are solely his fault.
That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did
not help.
I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the
political level it is all Stalin.
Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool.
yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war.
War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it
destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as
in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter
what? Cough/...
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit killed by an asteroid.
NEVER.
How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
result of its impact?
On 7/23/25 13:03, chine.bleu wrote:
x wrote:
My guess is that they found the meteorite fragments, and then compared
them with times of meteor showers. I am thinking the boy in Africa
was indirectly struck. In other words, the meteorite hit a tree and
then hit the boy. I am thinking that either the boy was not seriously injured or not injured at all. That was a while back. I would guess
that the boy is a young adult by now. I do not remember which African country that was.
On 7/23/25 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:[-]
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
result of its impact?
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!
In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
has EVER been killed by an asteroid!
Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...
When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????
There could be various meanings of the word 'hit' but
I am thinking that some types of dust do drift or blow
to the ground every day that are supposed to be derived from
meteor fragments or micrometeorites.>
That would tend to mean today and every day.
On 7/24/2025 4:00 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
With this convention asteroid impacts are not rare events,
Jan
[1] This is about the size that is needed to reach the ground.
Did massive comet impacts bring water to our little speck (planet),
earth in our little galaxy in cosmic time?
On 7/24/2025 4:00 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
x <[email protected]> wrote:
On 7/23/25 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:[-]
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the >>>> result of its impact?
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!
In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
has EVER been killed by an asteroid!
Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...
When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????
There could be various meanings of the word 'hit' but
I am thinking that some types of dust do drift or blow
to the ground every day that are supposed to be derived from
meteor fragments or micrometeorites.>
That would tend to mean today and every day.
A common convention is to call things smaller than 1 meter meteoroids,
and bigger things asteroids. [1]
(you may prefer another convention of course)
With this convention asteroid impacts are not rare events,
Jan
[1] This is about the size that is needed to reach the ground.
Did massive comet impacts bring water to our little speck (planet),
earth in our little galaxy in cosmic time?
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 22:41:58 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 6/20/2025 3:13 PM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for
them.
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one,
you fucking L�gner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o
Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes!
The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy sat and
watched.
Underwater drone navy mixed with ballistic anti ship missiles and
anti-ship drone mine arrays?
LOL!
The cruiser was being launched and the engineers flubbed the set up.
Instead of the ship sliding smoothly into the water and floating, it
hit too fast, listed and capsized.
Brand new ship. Sunk itself at launch.
I don't think we need to fear much from people who can't even launch a
boat properly.
Did massive comet impacts bring water to our little speck (planet),
earth in our little galaxy in cosmic time?
Quite possible, but there really is no need to postulate that. The early solar system was cold enough to have ice around here,
I don't think we need to fear much from people who can't even launch a
boat properly.
You don't want to take risks with nukes, do you?
On 7/25/2025 1:12 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson <[email protected]> wrote:
On 7/24/2025 4:00 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
x <[email protected]> wrote:
On 7/23/25 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:[-]
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the >>>>>>> result of its impact?
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!
In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person >>>>>> has EVER been killed by an asteroid!
Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte... >>>>>>
When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????
There could be various meanings of the word 'hit' but
I am thinking that some types of dust do drift or blow
to the ground every day that are supposed to be derived from
meteor fragments or micrometeorites.>
That would tend to mean today and every day.
A common convention is to call things smaller than 1 meter meteoroids, >>>> and bigger things asteroids. [1]
(you may prefer another convention of course)
With this convention asteroid impacts are not rare events,
Jan
[1] This is about the size that is needed to reach the ground.
Did massive comet impacts bring water to our little speck (planet),
earth in our little galaxy in cosmic time?
Quite possible, but there really is no need to postulate that.
The early solar system was cold enough to have ice around here,
So, are you saying that water was already present on Earth in the "early >days", or did comet impacts help it as well?
J. J. Lodder wrote:
Did massive comet impacts bring water to our little speck (planet),
earth in our little galaxy in cosmic time?
Quite possible, but there really is no need to postulate that. The early
solar system was cold enough to have ice around here,
not entirely true. Ice dilates in space, hence ice contains an atmosphere, >gas or air, which is required for ice to exists. When ice melts, a gas is >released.
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:[...]
On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:
UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They >> >>>>> tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany >> >>>>> would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not
until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The
losses of the USSR are solely his fault.
That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did
not help.
I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the
political level it is all Stalin.
Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool.
yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war.
War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it
destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as >> >> in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter
what? Cough/...
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit
killed by an asteroid.
NEVER.
How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
result of its impact?
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!
In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
has EVER been killed by an asteroid!
Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...
When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????
Chris M. Thomasson <[email protected]> wrote:
On 7/24/2025 4:00 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
x <[email protected]> wrote:
On 7/23/25 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:[-]
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the >> >>>> result of its impact?
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!
In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
has EVER been killed by an asteroid!
Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...
When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????
There could be various meanings of the word 'hit' but
I am thinking that some types of dust do drift or blow
to the ground every day that are supposed to be derived from
meteor fragments or micrometeorites.>
That would tend to mean today and every day.
A common convention is to call things smaller than 1 meter meteoroids,
and bigger things asteroids. [1]
(you may prefer another convention of course)
With this convention asteroid impacts are not rare events,
Jan
[1] This is about the size that is needed to reach the ground.
Did massive comet impacts bring water to our little speck (planet),
earth in our little galaxy in cosmic time?
Quite possible, but there really is no need to postulate that.
The early solar system was cold enough to have ice around here,
Jan
On 7/24/2025 4:00 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
x <[email protected]> wrote:
On 7/23/25 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:[-]
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the >>>>> result of its impact?
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!
In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
has EVER been killed by an asteroid!
Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...
When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????
There could be various meanings of the word 'hit' but
I am thinking that some types of dust do drift or blow
to the ground every day that are supposed to be derived from
meteor fragments or micrometeorites.>
That would tend to mean today and every day.
A common convention is to call things smaller than 1 meter meteoroids,
and bigger things asteroids. [1]
(you may prefer another convention of course)
With this convention asteroid impacts are not rare events,
Jan
[1] This is about the size that is needed to reach the ground.
Did massive comet impacts bring water to our little speck (planet),
earth in our little galaxy in cosmic time?
x <[email protected]> wrote:
On 7/23/25 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:[-]
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
result of its impact?
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!
In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
has EVER been killed by an asteroid!
Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...
When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????
There could be various meanings of the word 'hit' but
I am thinking that some types of dust do drift or blow
to the ground every day that are supposed to be derived from
meteor fragments or micrometeorites.>
That would tend to mean today and every day.
A common convention is to call things smaller than 1 meter meteoroids,
and bigger things asteroids. [1]
(you may prefer another convention of course)
With this convention asteroid impacts are not rare events,
Jan
[1] This is about the size that is needed to reach the ground.
On 7/23/25 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war. >>>>> [...]
On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:
UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They >>>>>>>> tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany >>>>>>>> would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not >>>>>>>> until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The >>>>>>>> losses of the USSR are solely his fault.
That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did
not help.
I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the >>>>>>>> political level it is all Stalin.
Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool. >>>>>>
War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it >>>>> destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as >>>>> in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter
what? Cough/...
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit >>>> killed by an asteroid.
NEVER.
How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
result of its impact?
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!
In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
has EVER been killed by an asteroid!
Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...
When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????
There could be various meanings of the word 'hit' but
I am thinking that some types of dust do drift or blow
to the ground every day that are supposed to be derived from
meteor fragments or micrometeorites.>
That would tend to mean today and every day.
On 7/25/2025 7:38 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 20:46:32 -0000 (UTC), Blaine Baidakov
<[email protected]> wrote:
J. J. Lodder wrote:
Did massive comet impacts bring water to our little speck (planet),
earth in our little galaxy in cosmic time?
Quite possible, but there really is no need to postulate that. The early >>>> solar system was cold enough to have ice around here,
not entirely true. Ice dilates in space, hence ice contains an atmosphere, >>> gas or air, which is required for ice to exists. When ice melts, a gas is >>> released.
Does dry ice gets dry does it emit a gas?
What happens to dry ice rapidly releasing gas in a sealed contained >environment?
On 7/25/2025 7:38 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 20:46:32 -0000 (UTC), Blaine BaidakovWear the proper protection. Put dry ice in a plastic bottle. Add some
<[email protected]> wrote:
J. J. Lodder wrote:
Did massive comet impacts bring water to our little speck (planet),
earth in our little galaxy in cosmic time?
Quite possible, but there really is no need to postulate that. The early >>>> solar system was cold enough to have ice around here,
not entirely true. Ice dilates in space, hence ice contains an atmosphere, >>> gas or air, which is required for ice to exists. When ice melts, a gas is >>> released.
Does dry ice gets dry does it emit a gas?
water then close the top, run away. What might happen?
On 7/25/2025 1:12 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 22:41:58 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 6/20/2025 3:13 PM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>>>> them.
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one,
you fucking L�gner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o
Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes!
The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy sat and >>>>> watched.
Underwater drone navy mixed with ballistic anti ship missiles and
anti-ship drone mine arrays?
LOL!
The cruiser was being launched and the engineers flubbed the set up.
Instead of the ship sliding smoothly into the water and floating, it
hit too fast, listed and capsized.
Brand new ship. Sunk itself at launch.
I don't think we need to fear much from people who can't even launch a
boat properly.
You don't want to take risks with nukes, do you?
Good point. If they get into the crazy hands, well... They say we need
to nuke to perhaps help bring about the great event from some religious >prophecy or something? Yikes!
On 7/25/2025 7:33 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:37:22 -0700, The Starmaker
<[email protected]> wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war. >>>>>> [...]
On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:
UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They >>>>>>>>> tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany >>>>>>>>> would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not >>>>>>>>> until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The >>>>>>>>> losses of the USSR are solely his fault.
That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did
not help.
I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the >>>>>>>>> political level it is all Stalin.
Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool. >>>>>>>
War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it >>>>>> destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as >>>>>> in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter >>>>>> what? Cough/...
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit >>>>> killed by an asteroid.
NEVER.
How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
result of its impact?
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!
In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
has EVER been killed by an asteroid!
Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...
When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????
All Chris can find is BEFORE The Ice Age!
You seem to act like it never occurred before.
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote:sat and
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 22:41:58 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 6/20/2025 3:13 PM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for
them.
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one,
you fucking Lügner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o
Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes!
The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy
watched.
Underwater drone navy mixed with ballistic anti ship missiles and
anti-ship drone mine arrays?
LOL!
The cruiser was being launched and the engineers flubbed the set up.
Instead of the ship sliding smoothly into the water and floating, it
hit too fast, listed and capsized.
Brand new ship. Sunk itself at launch.
I don't think we need to fear much from people who can't even launch a
boat properly.
You don't want to take risks with nukes, do you?
Jan
On 7/25/2025 1:12 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 22:41:58 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 6/20/2025 3:13 PM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>>>> them.
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one,
you fucking Lügner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o
Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes!
The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy sat
and
watched.
Underwater drone navy mixed with ballistic anti ship missiles and
anti-ship drone mine arrays?
LOL!
The cruiser was being launched and the engineers flubbed the set up.
Instead of the ship sliding smoothly into the water and floating, it
hit too fast, listed and capsized.
Brand new ship. Sunk itself at launch.
I don't think we need to fear much from people who can't even launch a
boat properly.
You don't want to take risks with nukes, do you?
Good point. If they get into the crazy hands, well... They say we need
to nuke to perhaps help bring about the great event from some religious prophecy or something? Yikes!
On 7/25/2025 1:12 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 22:41:58 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 6/20/2025 3:13 PM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>>> them.
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one,
you fucking L�gner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o
Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes!
The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy sat and >>>> watched.
Underwater drone navy mixed with ballistic anti ship missiles and
anti-ship drone mine arrays?
LOL!
The cruiser was being launched and the engineers flubbed the set up.
Instead of the ship sliding smoothly into the water and floating, it
hit too fast, listed and capsized.
Brand new ship. Sunk itself at launch.
I don't think we need to fear much from people who can't even launch a
boat properly.
You don't want to take risks with nukes, do you?
Good point. If they get into the crazy hands, well... They say we need
to nuke to perhaps help bring about the great event from some religious prophecy or something? Yikes!
On 7/26/2025 12:01 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 00:44:08 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 7/25/2025 7:33 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:37:22 -0700, The Starmaker
<[email protected]> wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:[...]
On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:
UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about
Barbarossa. They
tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy >>>>>>>>>>> Germany
would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It >>>>>>>>>>> was not
until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke >>>>>>>>>>> up. The
losses of the USSR are solely his fault.
That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the >>>>>>>>>>> invasion did
not help.
I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the >>>>>>>>>>> political level it is all Stalin.
Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a >>>>>>>>>> fool.
yous people still till to this day doen't seem to
understand ...war.
War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while...
Before it
destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the >>>>>>>> point as
in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter >>>>>>>> what? Cough/...
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever
been hit
killed by an asteroid.
NEVER.
How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the >>>>>> result of its impact?
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!
In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person >>>>> has EVER been killed by an asteroid!
Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte... >>>>>
When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????
All Chris can find is BEFORE The Ice Age!
You seem to act like it never occurred before.
It? are you refering to the ice age or Nasa's asteroids?
Have large asteroids and/or comets hit he earth before? Ice ages and
warming periods just means that radical climate change is normal even if humans are not artificially accelerating it now.
On 7/26/25 18:29, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/26/2025 12:01 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 00:44:08 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 7/25/2025 7:33 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:37:22 -0700, The Starmaker
<[email protected]> wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:[...]
On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:
UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about
Barbarossa. They
tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his
fantasy Germany
would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It >>>>>>>>>>>> was not
until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke >>>>>>>>>>>> up. The
losses of the USSR are solely his fault.
That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the >>>>>>>>>>>> invasion did
not help.
I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on >>>>>>>>>>>> the political level it is all Stalin.
Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as >>>>>>>>>>> a fool.
yous people still till to this day doen't seem to
understand ...war.
War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while...
Before it
destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the >>>>>>>>> point as
in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no >>>>>>>>> matter what? Cough/...
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons.. >>>>>>>>
the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever
been hit
killed by an asteroid.
NEVER.
How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things
from the result of its impact?
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!
In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or
person has EVER been killed by an asteroid!
Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your
forte...
When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????
All Chris can find is BEFORE The Ice Age!
You seem to act like it never occurred before.
It? are you refering to the ice age or Nasa's asteroids?
Have large asteroids and/or comets hit he earth before? Ice ages and
warming periods just means that radical climate change is normal even
if humans are not artificially accelerating it now.
Today's rate of climate change is the 2nd fastest known to mankind.
The fastest one was 66 million years ago, namely the Yucatan's
Chicxulub meteor impact. It ended the Cretaceous Period, the entire
Mesozoic Era. Its the primary cause of the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) extinction event, which led to the extinction of 76% of all plant and
animal species.
FYI, this also means that contemporary rate of change is faster than
all known Ice Ages & warming periods. By how much? At least 10x
faster.
The ramifications of this isn't that the Earth won't survive.
It will, but will just be radically changed.
The concern for humans is if we as a species will survive, and if we
do, with how much socio-economic damage & civilization collapse.
Sooo....are ya feeling lucky?
-hh
The Youger Dryas event is also thought to
have been caused by an asteroid but the crater
hasn't been found yet.
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:[...]
On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:
UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They >>>>>>> tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany >>>>>>> would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not >>>>>>> until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The >>>>>>> losses of the USSR are solely his fault.
That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did
not help.
I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the
political level it is all Stalin.
Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool.
yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war.
War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it
destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as >>>> in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter
what? Cough/...
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit
killed by an asteroid.
NEVER.
How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
result of its impact?
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!
In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
has EVER been killed by an asteroid!
Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...Most recently? And large (ish)?
When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????
On 7/25/2025 9:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:46:17 -0700, x <[email protected]> wrote:
On 7/23/25 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war. >>>>>>> [...]
On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:
UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They >>>>>>>>>> tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany
would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not >>>>>>>>>> until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The >>>>>>>>>> losses of the USSR are solely his fault.
That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did
not help.
I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the >>>>>>>>>> political level it is all Stalin.
Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool. >>>>>>>>
War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it >>>>>>> destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as >>>>>>> in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter >>>>>>> what? Cough/...
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit >>>>>> killed by an asteroid.
NEVER.
How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the >>>>> result of its impact?
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!
In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
has EVER been killed by an asteroid!
Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte...
When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????
There could be various meanings of the word 'hit' but
I am thinking that some types of dust do drift or blow
to the ground every day that are supposed to be derived from
meteor fragments or micrometeorites.>
That would tend to mean today and every day.
By 'hit' I mean, if an asteroid hitsyou on the head and kills you..
or if an asteroid hits an elephant on the head and lills it..
Where else does a ateroid have to hit you to kill you?
If a rock falls from the sky and hits you...
But the TRUTH is, an asteroid NEVER hit the Earth....
the action of one asteroid forcibly into contact with the earth and
all it's inhabits...hit!
Never Happen.
Dats NASA Science Fiction to exort grant money using FEAR.
Ask the Mafia what does EXTORTION means.
I FUCKING HIT YOU ON THE FUCKING HEAD IF YOU DON'T GIME ME YOURFUCKING
MONEY!
Hit.
Sigh. An asteroid hits say, 50 miles away and kills you. Is that a hit?
Hit???? I already explained an asteroid NEVER hit the earth, or
landed, or impacted or Touched the earth.
Breaking up in the atmosphere doesn't mean it didn't hit... it just
means it hit in pieces. Fragments still reach the ground, craters still
form, and the energy still impacts Earth. Whether it comes down whole or
in chunks, it hit?
On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 15:26:36 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 7/25/2025 9:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:46:17 -0700, x <[email protected]> wrote:
On 7/23/25 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war. >>>>>>>> [...]
On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:
UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They
tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany
would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not >>>>>>>>>>> until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The >>>>>>>>>>> losses of the USSR are solely his fault.
That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did
not help.
I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the >>>>>>>>>>> political level it is all Stalin.
Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool. >>>>>>>>>
War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it >>>>>>>> destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as
in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter >>>>>>>> what? Cough/...
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit >>>>>>> killed by an asteroid.
NEVER.
How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the >>>>>> result of its impact?
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!
In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person >>>>> has EVER been killed by an asteroid!
Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte... >>>>>
When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????
There could be various meanings of the word 'hit' but
I am thinking that some types of dust do drift or blow
to the ground every day that are supposed to be derived from
meteor fragments or micrometeorites.>
That would tend to mean today and every day.
By 'hit' I mean, if an asteroid hitsyou on the head and kills you..
or if an asteroid hits an elephant on the head and lills it..
Where else does a ateroid have to hit you to kill you?
If a rock falls from the sky and hits you...
But the TRUTH is, an asteroid NEVER hit the Earth....
the action of one asteroid forcibly into contact with the earth and
all it's inhabits...hit!
Never Happen.
Dats NASA Science Fiction to exort grant money using FEAR.
Ask the Mafia what does EXTORTION means.
I FUCKING HIT YOU ON THE FUCKING HEAD IF YOU DON'T GIME ME YOURFUCKING
MONEY!
Hit.
Sigh. An asteroid hits say, 50 miles away and kills you. Is that a hit?
Hit???? I already explained an asteroid NEVER hit the earth, or
landed, or impacted or Touched the earth.
Is there a piece of an asteriod in some science musem on Earth?
A sample?
maybe on ebay?
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
Hit???? I already explained an asteroid NEVER hit the earth, or
landed, or impacted or Touched the earth.
Breaking up in the atmosphere doesn't mean it didn't hit... it just
means it hit in pieces. Fragments still reach the ground, craters still
form, and the energy still impacts Earth. Whether it comes down whole or
in chunks, it hit?
Earth was hit by space rocks and continues to be. Which kind of space
rock is an asteroid?
On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 15:26:36 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 7/25/2025 9:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:46:17 -0700, x <[email protected]> wrote:
On 7/23/25 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war. >>>>>>>> [...]
On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:
UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. They
tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy Germany
would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not >>>>>>>>>>> until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The >>>>>>>>>>> losses of the USSR are solely his fault.
That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the invasion did
not help.
I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the >>>>>>>>>>> political level it is all Stalin.
Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool. >>>>>>>>>
War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it >>>>>>>> destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the point as
in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter >>>>>>>> what? Cough/...
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit >>>>>>> killed by an asteroid.
NEVER.
How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the >>>>>> result of its impact?
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!
In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person >>>>> has EVER been killed by an asteroid!
Okay, I'll make it easier for you since science is not your forte... >>>>>
When was the last asteroid that hit the earth????
There could be various meanings of the word 'hit' but
I am thinking that some types of dust do drift or blow
to the ground every day that are supposed to be derived from
meteor fragments or micrometeorites.>
That would tend to mean today and every day.
By 'hit' I mean, if an asteroid hitsyou on the head and kills you..
or if an asteroid hits an elephant on the head and lills it..
Where else does a ateroid have to hit you to kill you?
If a rock falls from the sky and hits you...
But the TRUTH is, an asteroid NEVER hit the Earth....
the action of one asteroid forcibly into contact with the earth and
all it's inhabits...hit!
Never Happen.
Dats NASA Science Fiction to exort grant money using FEAR.
Ask the Mafia what does EXTORTION means.
I FUCKING HIT YOU ON THE FUCKING HEAD IF YOU DON'T GIME ME YOURFUCKING
MONEY!
Hit.
Sigh. An asteroid hits say, 50 miles away and kills you. Is that a hit?
Hit???? I already explained an asteroid NEVER hit the earth, or
landed, or impacted or Touched the earth.
Is there a piece of an asteriod in some science musem on Earth?
A sample?
Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, youAllied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not justsure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them. >>>>>>
scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes
proved Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and >>>>>>>> no bombs.
fucking Lügner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one
or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.
The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an
atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
actually built atomic bombs.
But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not
been born then.
That's what history and historians are for.
Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because
Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).
So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).
Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:25 schrieb Gronk:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Dienstag000024, 24.06.2025 um 12:28 schrieb chine.bleu:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Well, possibly you were correct.
But how could you possibly know?
Possibly the Nazis knew (at least) about atomic bombs, built and sold >>>>> them to the USA.
'Selling of A-bombs' would be actually a relatively 'rational'
behavior,
since such a-bombs are precious, though movable, objects.
(BTW, that's why I think, that Iran has already a-bombs.)
Now tell us how Germany made the first jet fighter.
The Gloster Meteor does ot count.
There existed a number of Jet-fighters in Germany at the end of WWII.
But I certainly cannot tell you, how they were made, because I wasn't
even born then.
Yes you can, you even provide a youtube link.
I'm a little insecure, what you try to say with that statement.
Certainly you don't want to tell me, that all YouTube videos contain the truth.
(That would be imho a really silly assumption.)
But a few videos on YouTube do contain something else than lies.
The problem is, that it is difficult to find out, which videos fall into
that category.
But you may have a look at this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mwga3crerJc
On 7/21/25 23:06, The Starmaker wrote:
the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit
killed by an asteroid.
NEVER.
I think that you are not an AI programmed to change the subject
at this point. Anyway there was a short article in Sky and
Telescope about 20 or so years ago about a boy in Africa who was
struck by a meteorite at the time who lived after being struck
by it. I am not going to bother to try to dig it up for you.
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:
Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not justsure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>>>> them.
scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes
proved Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and >>>>>>>>> no bombs.
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you >>>>>>> fucking Lügner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.
The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an
atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
actually built atomic bombs.
But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not
been born then.
That's what history and historians are for.
Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because
Huh? Churchill paid EVERY historian in the world?
Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).
https://slate.com/culture/2019/11/history-is-written-by-the-victors-quote-origin.html
So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).
What about the histories written by non British authors?
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
actually built atomic bombs.
But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not
been born then.
That's what history and historians are for.
Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because
Huh? Churchill paid EVERY historian in the world?
Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).
https://slate.com/culture/2019/11/history-is-written-by-the-victors- quote-origin.html
So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).
What about the histories written by non British authors?
On 2025-07-23 15:37, The Starmaker wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 11:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/21/2025 9:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
yous people still till to this day doen't seem to understand ...war. >>>>> [...]
On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:15:19 -0700, "chine.bleu" wrote:
UK and US had broken various ciphers and knew about Barbarossa. >>>>>>>> They
tried to warn Stalin again and again. Stalin kept his fantasy
Germany
would destroy UK and then USSR could march to La Manche. It was not >>>>>>>> until Germany was on the road to Leningrad that Stalin woke up. The >>>>>>>> losses of the USSR are solely his fault.
That he killed and imprisonned his best generals before the
invasion did
not help.
I acknowledge the pain and sufferring of the people, but on the >>>>>>>> political level it is all Stalin.
Quite correct. Millions of Soviets died because Stalin as a fool. >>>>>>
War is NO good. Earth needs to try anti war for a while... Before it >>>>> destroys itself. Ahh, a massive asteroid impact is besides the
point as
in we are going to die anyway? Cough. Shit. We are fucked no matter
what? Cough/...
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
the Truth is...in the history of man..never has a person ever been hit >>>> killed by an asteroid.
NEVER.
How many asteroids have hit the earth and killed many things from the
result of its impact?
I'm surprised you 'fall' for NASA's 'the sky is falling' cons..
NEVER in the History of Earth has an asteriod fell on earth!
Lots of asteroids have fallen on the Earth.
But once an asteroid enters Earth's atmosphere, we start calling them "meteors" (if they burn up before hitting the ground) or
"meteorites" (when they're large enough not to burn up completely and
hit the ground).
In other words, no insects, no animals, no fishes or people or person
has EVER been killed by an asteroid!
The dinosaurs were wiped out by an asteroid hitting the area of the
Earth now known as the Yucatan Peninsula.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicxulub_crater>
Gronk wrote:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:
Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just >>>>>>>>>> scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes >>>>>>>>>> proved Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and >>>>>>>>>> no bombs.sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>>>>> them.
They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you >>>>>>>> fucking Lügner.
Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased
one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.
The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an
atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.
There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have
actually built atomic bombs.
But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not >>>>> been born then.
That's what history and historians are for.
Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because
Huh? Churchill paid EVERY historian in the world?
Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).
https://slate.com/culture/2019/11/history-is-written-by-the-victors-quote-origin.html
So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).
What about the histories written by non British authors?
Rejected.
<https://ww2f.com/threads/controversy-of-german-generals-memoirs.51233/#google_vignette>
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 17:58:41 |
| Calls: | 12,103 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 15,004 |
| Messages: | 6,518,078 |