XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics

Am Dienstag000015, 15.04.2025 um 05:24 schrieb rhertz:

On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 2:46:46 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

On 4/14/25 2:01 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:

rhertz <[email protected]> wrote:

Wien was already a Nobel Prize by 1905. He had a tremendous respect and >>>> influence from the European physics community (and also abroad). Planck >>>> didn't have this.

Why should we believe anything you write
when you can't even get simple facts like this right?

Jan

What difference does it make what happened anyway. I don't understand
you guys in this relativity forum.

Some physics were developed and that's it. The important thing is the
physics not the history of physics. Doesn't matter who did what.

And all these human names Priests have packed into it. Concepts as well
as units and rules and even some formulas! All with human names on them.
Are you people nuts?..

Leave science in the hands of cro-magnons and their tribal instinct will
turn any physics source into a history of it instead.

One day, when science goes back to the people it belongs, you won't find
a single human name inside any physics text.

It is disgusting how things are, thanks to you cro-magnon early humans.
There's reason I leave it to my dick to handle you dimwits.

You are fucking deadly wrong, Mr. Micropenis.

Immortal creators of modern science will live forever:

- Kepler
- Galilei
- Newton
- Maxwell
- Faraday
- Ampere
- Fourier
- Ohm
- Volta
- Euler
- Gauss
- Laplace
- Lagrange
- Hamilton
- Joule
- Watt
- Kirchoff
- Kelvin
- Bohr
- Poincaré
- Schrodinger
- Heisenberg
- Fermi
- Lavoisier
- Mendeleiev
- Dalton
- Avogrado
- Pauling
- Curie
- Shockley

This list cover the most relevant scientists in the last 400 years.

Others, missing, are minor figures or just irrelevant idiots with undue
fame.

I would miss Heinrich Hertz here and also Nicola Tesla.

Hertz found radio waves and Tesla invented ton of important things like
radio, alternating currents and remote control.

Otto Hahn and Roentgen were also certainly worth mentioning.

On the other hand a number of the people on the list above were mathematicians, like e.g. Euler, and some chemicists (Curie, Mendelejev..).

TH

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics

On 4/18/2025 10:45 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:

Physfitfreak <[email protected]> wrote:

On 4/17/25 4:11 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:

Physfitfreak <[email protected]> wrote:

On 4/16/25 4:14 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:

Physfitfreak <[email protected]> wrote:

On 4/14/25 2:01 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:

rhertz <[email protected]> wrote:

Wien was already a Nobel Prize by 1905. He had a tremendous respect and
influence from the European physics community (and also abroad). Planck
didn't have this.

Why should we believe anything you write
when you can't even get simple facts like this right?

Jan

What difference does it make what happened anyway. I don't understand >>>>>> you guys in this relativity forum.

Some physics were developed and that's it. The important thing is the >>>>>> physics not the history of physics. Doesn't matter who did what.

And all these human names Priests have packed into it. Concepts as well >>>>>> as units and rules and even some formulas! All with human names on them. >>>>>> Are you people nuts?..

Perhaps, but it is a very human trait.
Things memorise more easily when there is a name attached to it.

For example, even asteroids get names.
Asteroid 1001 Gaussia for example may be easier on the brain
than the provisional designation 1923 OA.
Asteroid 'Gaussia' will even be understood if the number is forgotten, >>>>>
Jan

No it's not that innocent a mess. Priest-minded crappy scientists,
disguised as "scientists" have been forcing it to pack non-related
humanities stuff in it for their own tribal interests. And they've gone >>>> too far. It's become disgusting in fact. Takes the attention of students >>>> away to stuff unrelated to physics.

Did Newton ever do that? Of course not.

Of course he did. It was Newton who started the tradition
of nasty priority fights in physics and mathematics.
He wanted all the world to know that it was Newton's calculus,
and not Leinbiz's.

As far as I know he never named
names in his physics works. The closest that he came to point to a
"history" of it was his comment about "giants". He was too good a
physicist to name even those giants, cause it would be trash as far as >>>> physics concepts were concerned.

That was a snide comment in another priority dispute, with Hooke.
(who was a small man)
See Gleick's biography for more on it.

Physics history is a humanities field.

All history is.

It has absolutely nothing to do with physics.

Then why call it 'history of physics'?

Jan

Newton did all that "nasty priority fight" _outside_ his physics books.
Do I have to remind this to you?

Come on, thePrincipia is in the first place a self-erected pedestal,
created for posing on top of it as an absolute genius
by being as difficult and as obscure as possible.

Just like The Shit of your idiot guru; the
difference is - Newton's text had also some
sense.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)