XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
W dniu 26.05.2024 o 16:37, Devan χωροκεντρομένο pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second As seen, the definition of second >>>> loved so much to be invoked by relativistic morons - wasn't valid in
the time when their idiot guru lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was
ordinary 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
you dont undrestand. That second is based on a oscillation which is too
long. A smaller duration oscillation proves the longer wrong. That's
why the smaller is better.
Maybe it is; still - the longer one was good enough for your idiot guru
, and for the first generations of relativistic idiots as well - and
that makes their mumble inconsistent.
that's imprecise, me frendo.
Doesn't have to be. TAI, GPS time, UTC - are
slightly different from each other. True. The
reality is not a perfect gedankenwelt, me frendo.
A lot of scientist usenet users dont know
that, ie in computers, timing is essential. Without a second you can trust,
Which, as anyone can check GPS - is NOT your ISO
absurd. You may imagine your concept is superbrilliant;
but have you measured its superbrilliancy or you just
believe it is?
Doesn't really matter for the thread. The second
of your idiot guru was what it was and thus his
mumble was not even consistent.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)