On 04/27/2024 06:50 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
Le 27/04/2024 ร 19:50, [email protected] (J. J. Lodder) a รฉcrit : >>> bertietaylor <[email protected]> wrote:
That is not the case, so this is a new discovery - the Lorentz force
does
NOT have an equal and opposite reaction. Your point is merely
theoretical.
My evidence is experimental.
Correct, merely experimental.
Heh-heh.
Now the e=mcc wallahs will say the Sun goes around the Earth.
And the Moon is a superstructure, created by our distant ancestors. They
have even made a movie about it, "Moonfall" that I saw yesterday.
These guys si
It stands falsified by a reliable theory.
A theory is a conjecture that is widely shared. It is falsified by
experimental evidence.
Of course, that is from the scientific standpoint, not the theological
standpoint.
But then, physics is pure theology now, with e=mcc as dogma and Einstein
as God-Clown-Baby.
FYI, the Maxwell-Lorentz equations as they stand
do conserve energy-momentum.
No, they do not. Force = Magnetic field times current times length of
conductor in a nice vector relationship, with only one current as
variable, is intrinsically without reaction. It is most widely used by
all electrical and electronics engineers. It is the basis for modern
electric motor design.
If you want to be taken seriously it is up to you to tell the world
what is wrong with Maxwell-Lorentz,
and how these equations must be modified.
Nothing wrong with them. They are perfectly correct. My only grouse is
why the name of Lorentz should be there, it should be replaced by
Heaviside, for the vector notation he introduced. And the Lorentz force
must be renamed as Thomson-Heaviside Force, or abbreviated as THE force.
Out with Lorentz!
Maxwell in, Einstein out, is the word. The universe is full of aether,
it is infinite, and all matter linked with lines of electric force.
No big bang, no black holes, extreme cold below our feet at the cores of
the planets and stars.
Stars have trillion year cycles of birth and death, with gaining
hydrogen cover from nebulas and losing them to nebulas.
Gravity is an electrostatic phenomenon, like strong nuclear force.
As long as you can't do that you are merely an incompetent tinkerer,
Hardly. The Arindam-Newton Laws of Motion will take humanity to the
stars, after expanding all over the solar system.
And all the books on relativity-depravity and quantum-bunkum will be
burnt in a huge bonfire that will make the fires in Nalanda and
Alexandria universities look like small campfires.
Cheers,
Arindam (bin Einstein ban Gandhi) Banerjee, greatest genius of all time,
sole god among lotsa devils.
Jan
Force is a function of time.
(Was, "Heyy, Einstein, what are you, retarded?" The notion of
the accelerated and retarded potentials of course is a usual
thing in physics to effect to reflect the sum-of-histories / sum-of-potentials that represents the instantaneous classical
with regards to the non-linear/un-linear, the multipole,
and all the higher orders of acceleration, in a model
of classical motion, and accelerated/accelerating potentials.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retarded_potential
The empirical already has this stuff all over the place.
The role of the fundamental and foundations, is for mathematics,
what OWES physics more and better mathematics of continuity
and infinity and infinitesimals and infinite expressions
of the infinitely-many higher orders of acceleration
in dynamics in motion, to provide these mathematics,
what results MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS and the "ubiquitous
success of mathematics in physics".
Which is never wrong, ....
IP, as they say.
Force: is a function of time.
It's sum-of-histories sum-of-potentials, and, "GR first".
GPS satellites and driving the world, today,
are as according to the PPN ephemeris.
-
https://www.youtube.com/@rossfinlayson
(See "Moment and Motion" under "Philosophical Foreground".)
Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 04/27/2024 06:50 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
Le 27/04/2024 ร 19:50, [email protected] (J. J. Lodder) a รฉcrit : >>>> bertietaylor <[email protected]> wrote:
That is not the case, so this is a new discovery - the Lorentz force >>>>> does
NOT have an equal and opposite reaction. Your point is merely
theoretical.
My evidence is experimental.
Correct, merely experimental.
Heh-heh.
Now the e=mcc wallahs will say the Sun goes around the Earth.
And the Moon is a superstructure, created by our distant ancestors. They >>> have even made a movie about it, "Moonfall" that I saw yesterday.
These guys si
It stands falsified by a reliable theory.
A theory is a conjecture that is widely shared. It is falsified by
experimental evidence.
Of course, that is from the scientific standpoint, not the theological
standpoint.
But then, physics is pure theology now, with e=mcc as dogma and Einstein >>> as God-Clown-Baby.
FYI, the Maxwell-Lorentz equations as they stand
do conserve energy-momentum.
No, they do not. Force = Magnetic field times current times length of
conductor in a nice vector relationship, with only one current as
variable, is intrinsically without reaction. It is most widely used by
all electrical and electronics engineers. It is the basis for modern
electric motor design.
If you want to be taken seriously it is up to you to tell the world
what is wrong with Maxwell-Lorentz,
and how these equations must be modified.
Nothing wrong with them. They are perfectly correct. My only grouse is
why the name of Lorentz should be there, it should be replaced by
Heaviside, for the vector notation he introduced. And the Lorentz force >>> must be renamed as Thomson-Heaviside Force, or abbreviated as THE force. >>> Out with Lorentz!
Maxwell in, Einstein out, is the word. The universe is full of aether,
it is infinite, and all matter linked with lines of electric force.
No big bang, no black holes, extreme cold below our feet at the cores of >>> the planets and stars.
Stars have trillion year cycles of birth and death, with gaining
hydrogen cover from nebulas and losing them to nebulas.
Gravity is an electrostatic phenomenon, like strong nuclear force.
As long as you can't do that you are merely an incompetent tinkerer,
Hardly. The Arindam-Newton Laws of Motion will take humanity to the
stars, after expanding all over the solar system.
And all the books on relativity-depravity and quantum-bunkum will be
burnt in a huge bonfire that will make the fires in Nalanda and
Alexandria universities look like small campfires.
Cheers,
Arindam (bin Einstein ban Gandhi) Banerjee, greatest genius of all time, >>> sole god among lotsa devils.
Jan
Force is a function of time.
Force is mass multiplied by the acceleration on the mass.
When there is no movement the result is static, causing stress.
When there is movement for the mass we enter the world of dynamics.
Overall it is called mechanics.
(Was, "Heyy, Einstein, what are you, retarded?" The notion of
the accelerated and retarded potentials of course is a usual
thing in physics to effect to reflect the sum-of-histories /
sum-of-potentials that represents the instantaneous classical
with regards to the non-linear/un-linear, the multipole,
and all the higher orders of acceleration, in a model
of classical motion, and accelerated/accelerating potentials.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retarded_potential
The empirical already has this stuff all over the place.
The role of the fundamental and foundations, is for mathematics,
what OWES physics more and better mathematics of continuity
and infinity and infinitesimals and infinite expressions
of the infinitely-many higher orders of acceleration
in dynamics in motion, to provide these mathematics,
what results MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS and the "ubiquitous
success of mathematics in physics".
Which is never wrong, ....
IP, as they say.
Force: is a function of time.
It's sum-of-histories sum-of-potentials, and, "GR first".
GPS satellites and driving the world, today,
are as according to the PPN ephemeris.
-
https://www.youtube.com/@rossfinlayson
(See "Moment and Motion" under "Philosophical Foreground".)
On 4/27/2024 5:50 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
FYI, the Maxwell-Lorentz equations as they stand do conserve
energy-momentum. If you want to be taken seriously it is up to you to
tell the world what is wrong with Maxwell-Lorentz,
and how these equations must be modified.
As long as you can't do that you are merely an incompetent tinkerer,
It is entirely possible that Banjo stumbled across that apparent
violation of momentum by momentum being carried away by the
electromagnetic field. But we will never know since he refuses to
produce a writeup in sufficient detail for someone to reproduce his experiment, instead writing "Watch my videos!!!". Add his stubbornness
that he insists this is something new that violates
Newton/Einstein/Maxwell rather than a known existing behavior, you do
get the incompetent tinkerer.
On 5/2/2024 3:51 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
If the momentum is carried away by the electromagnetic fiel there is
still momentum conservation.
Exactly. I just allowed for the extremely remote possibility he detected something relevant. Almost certainly, if he found anything he found the
known momentum conserving electric field.
Volney wrote:detected
On 5/2/2024 3:51 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
If the momentum is carried away by the electromagnetic fiel there is
still momentum conservation.
Exactly. I just allowed for the extremely remote possibility he
something relevant. Almost certainly, if he found anything he found the
known momentum conserving electric field.
that's why relativity is wrong, he makes momentum out of static gravity.
But only the maters probability distribution can make that, so only my"๐๐ฃ
๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ฟ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐๐๐ฃ๐ฉ ๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ง ๐ค๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐๐ค๐ซ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ค๐๐ง๐ฅ๐๐ง๐จ ๐๐ค๐๐๐ก" can be correct.
here's the proof the Einstine didn't have the mental capacity to think
beyond the box. He didn't undrestand what is going on.
๐๐ฒ๐๐_๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ปโ๐_๐ธ๐ถ๐น๐น_๐๐ฒ๐๐๐_โ_๐จ๐ฆ_๐๐ผ๐๐๐ฒ_๐ผ๐ณ_๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐
Lawmakers have broadened the definition of anti-Semitism in the latest legislation
https://r%74.com/news/596891-jews-jesus-us-israel/
Volney wrote:
On 4/27/2024 5:50 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
FYI, the Maxwell-Lorentz equations as they stand do conserve
energy-momentum. If you want to be taken seriously it is up to you to
tell the world what is wrong with Maxwell-Lorentz,
and how these equations must be modified.
As long as you can't do that you are merely an incompetent tinkerer,
It is entirely possible that Banjo stumbled across that apparent
violation of momentum by momentum being carried away by the
electromagnetic field. But we will never know since he refuses to
produce a writeup in sufficient detail for someone to reproduce his
experiment, instead writing "Watch my videos!!!". Add his stubbornness
that he insists this is something new that violates
Newton/Einstein/Maxwell rather than a known existing behavior, you do
get the incompetent tinkerer.
not true, both wrong. Those are not "Maxwell's equations", but imported equations he stole from somebody else, ie Faraday, kiss my ass, etc.
https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/%76%69deo/0LmHzgkBYIll
https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/%76%69deo/0sHDgX4ba5KS
Volney wrote:
Even solar sails use that effect (momentum of sunlight).
No that is a heat engine. Temperature differences on either side cause
the motion. Radiant heat is em waves raising the temperature on one
side, that facing the sun.
Landon De la fuente wrote:
Volney wrote:
On 5/2/2024 3:51 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
If the momentum is carried away by the electromagnetic fiel there isExactly. I just allowed for the extremely remote possibility he
still momentum conservation.
detected something relevant. Almost certainly, if he found anything he
found the known momentum conserving electric field.
that's why relativity is wrong, he makes momentum out of static
gravity.
No this motor is to work in deep space. It is not a gravity drive.
Momentum is caused by first and third law violations. Exactly as was predicted in Arindam's book To the Stars that he wrote in 1999 and
published online free to all in 2000.
bertietaylor wrote:
Volney wrote:
Even solar sails use that effect (momentum of sunlight).
No that is a heat engine. Temperature differences on either side cause
the motion. Radiant heat is em waves raising the temperature on one
side, that facing the sun.
you don't undrestand, what gives "the rise in temperature on one side"?
Temperature of vacuum?
here's one more proof the putina is a jewkranian traitor piece of shit onisraelite
the face of the earth.
๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ_๐ต๐ถ๐๐_๐ฝ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ๐ฟ_๐ฏ๐๐_๐ถ๐ป_๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป_๐ฏ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ_๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ด๐ถ๐ผ๐ป_โ_๐ด๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ
Two were injured when a village in Belgorod Region was hit in a Ukrainian
UAV attack, Vyacheslav Gladkov has said https://www.r%74.com/russia/596927-drone-attack-belgorod-ukraine/
There you go folks...Genocide Joe 61billion dollars donation to the
Ukranazis are being utilised to murder innocent Russian civilians on the
street !
They will call this crap of course ''self defense'' like the IDF
terrorists..... Ukraine is no victim. It is like Israel a country of genocidal extremists dreaming of ethnic cleansing and destruction of others....target
Targeting civilians same as ISIS does. Same signature, same department in
Langley.
The punk Ukroids are too afraid to fight Russian soldiers head on so
innocent people instead. Yeah, really brave you assholes. LIke the IDF zionist neocon terrorists by the way.
Lakhram Vassilikos wrote:
bertietaylor wrote:
Volney wrote:
Even solar sails use that effect (momentum of sunlight).No that is a heat engine. Temperature differences on either side cause
the motion. Radiant heat is em waves raising the temperature on one
side, that facing the sun.
you don't undrestand, what gives "the rise in temperature on one side"?
Temperature of vacuum?
Plain electromagnetic in action. The electrical field impinging on the
sail creates a current which creates heat from resistance of the
circuit. Thus heat causes motion as in all heat engines.
bertietaylor wrote:he
Landon De la fuente wrote:
Volney wrote:
On 5/2/2024 3:51 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
If the momentum is carried away by the electromagnetic fiel there is >>>>> still momentum conservation.Exactly. I just allowed for the extremely remote possibility he
detected something relevant. Almost certainly, if he found anything
found the known momentum conserving electric field.
that's why relativity is wrong, he makes momentum out of static
gravity.
No this motor is to work in deep space. It is not a gravity drive.
Momentum is caused by first and third law violations. Exactly as was
predicted in Arindam's book To the Stars that he wrote in 1999 and
published online free to all in 2000.
this is very nice,
momentum out of empty gravity, in those equations. People are so stupid doesn't know, nor ask, what those relativity equations are for.
here's the motherefucker pisrael attacking peaceful neighbour countries,with
because not doing it "๐๐ฉ'๐จ_๐๐ฃ๐ฉ๐๐จ๐๐ข๐๐ฉ๐" lol. What a motherfucker fools,
their supporters, the motherfucker english pigs and amrica.
๐๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฒ๐น_๐๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ธ๐ฒ๐_๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ด๐ฒ๐_๐ป๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ_๐๐ฎ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ฐ๐๐_โ_๐บ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฎ
Eight Syrian soldiers were reportedly killed in the attack on Thursday https://www.r%74.com/news/596918-israel-strikes-syria-compound/
which proves once again that the putina is a jew, not a Christian. The
putina is a lying fucking traitor ๐ ๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ง_๐๐ค๐ฎ of khazaria. Period.
bertietaylor wrote:cause
Lakhram Vassilikos wrote:
bertietaylor wrote:
Volney wrote:
Even solar sails use that effect (momentum of sunlight).No that is a heat engine. Temperature differences on either side
side"?the motion. Radiant heat is em waves raising the temperature on one
side, that facing the sun.
you don't undrestand, what gives "the rise in temperature on one
Temperature of vacuum?
Plain electromagnetic in action. The electrical field impinging on the
sail creates a current which creates heat from resistance of the
circuit. Thus heat causes motion as in all heat engines.
which comes from the pressure from the sun, proving the point. It has
nothing to do "heat engines" and temperature. You don't undrestand the physicality of physics, me friend.
which comes from the pressure from the sun, proving the point. It has
nothing to do "heat engines" and temperature. You don't undrestand the
physicality of physics, me friend.
There is pressure apparently from the sun but that is not from the
momentum of energy particles fir energy particles do not exist
What exists is radiation or electromagnetic waves.
Heat engines are something else, based on
mater/gas, not EM.
Heat engines are about converting heat into motion, fool.
I explained that in detail, numbskull.
bertietaylor wrote:idiot.
which comes from the pressure from the sun, proving the point. It has
nothing to do "heat engines" and temperature. You don't undrestand the
physicality of physics, me friend.
There is pressure apparently from the sun but that is not from the
momentum of energy particles fir energy particles do not exist
What exists is radiation or electromagnetic waves.
that comes from the sun, fucking stupid. Not from the body. What an
It's the sun giving the pressure.
mater/gas, not EM.
You should excuse to everybody. What an idiot.
bertietaylor wrote:
Heat engines are something else, based on
mater/gas, not EM.
Heat engines are about converting heat into motion, fool.
I explained that in detail, numbskull.
heat comes only from mater/gas fucking imbecile, not from EM. Kiss my ass.
Bud Fudlacker wrote:
heat comes only from mater/gas fucking imbecile, not from EM. Kiss myHeat engines are something else, based on mater/gas, not EM.Heat engines are about converting heat into motion, fool.
ass.
Shit of Einstein, learn the old correct science that aether the medium
of em waves IS matter.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 04:14:35 |
| Calls: | 12,099 |
| Calls today: | 7 |
| Files: | 15,003 |
| Messages: | 6,517,890 |