Is Ross Finlayson the new Archimedes Plutonium.
I remember Archy Boy posting copy paste of his
own nonsense generating larger and large posts.
Looks like Rossy Boy has the same virus now.
Ross Finlayson schrieb:
... [...] ...
The cosmic microwave background provides the possibility ofinformation transfer from one aeon to another, including of intelligent
Which is ironic, since Googl Groups got shot
down, and many Newsgroup servers have a limited
retention time anyway. So large posts have not
any Search Engine Optimization (SEO) advantage at all.
At best you can use Newsgroups as a public
notebook now for short time communication over USENET,
where pages get automatically erased after a while.
Or for short lived news announcements, as originally conceived.
Mild Shock schrieb:
Is Ross Finlayson the new Archimedes Plutonium.
I remember Archy Boy posting copy paste of his
own nonsense generating larger and large posts.
Looks like Rossy Boy has the same virus now.
Ross Finlayson schrieb:
... [...] ...
Yeah, every USENET post sort of lands right in
the Library of Congress, don't you know.
On 12/19/2024 06:16 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
Nope, it lands nowhere and gets deleted after
a while. This is called the retention time.
Different servers will have different
retention times for the same newsgroup;
some may keep posts for as little as one
or two weeks, others may hold them for many years.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_newsgroup#Types
Do you find any of your posts from 12
years ago on an ordinary news server?
Ross Finlayson schrieb:
Yeah, every USENET post sort of lands right in
the Library of Congress, don't you know.
Sure, some modern services have 20+ years text retention,
if you were following news.admin when Google Groups
cut itself loose from usenet after turning into a
vandalistic spam-hive that it could obviously mitigate,
about "Archive All Text Usenet", some fellow furthermore
posted a feed of like all of text usenet and like
including the DejaNews CD's contents and these, yeah.
It's not even like 4 terabytes. Less than a 1000 movies, say.
What are you a clown? I'm not buying your spam.
Which is ironic, since Googl Groups got shot
down, and many Newsgroup servers have a limited
retention time anyway. So large posts have not
any Search Engine Optimization (SEO) advantage at all.
At best you can use Newsgroups as a public
notebook now for short time communication over USENET,
where pages get automatically erased after a while.
On 12/21/2024 10:50 PM, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Donnerstag000019, 19.12.2024 um 09:14 schrieb Mild Shock:
Which is ironic, since Googl Groups got shot
down, and many Newsgroup servers have a limited
retention time anyway. So large posts have not
any Search Engine Optimization (SEO) advantage at all.
At best you can use Newsgroups as a public
notebook now for short time communication over USENET,
where pages get automatically erased after a while.
This is actually wrong, since UseNet content is copied to other
datebases very often.
For instance: many 'forums' on the Web are actually not filled by lively
discussions over the web, but are copies from the UseNet.
Also private copies do exist and are often filled into database
programs, which are hosted on privately owned hardware.
All of these copies are independent from each other and also from their
sources in the UseNet.
In effect UseNet content can never be removed from the face of the Earth
entirely, once it is written.
It can actually last longer than the pyramids and can never be removed
by, say, malicious governments or similar.
But the server themselves store only a limited subset from the UseNet
traffic. But this does not say, that anything could vanish, just because
it isn't in the database of the UseNet servers anymore.
This is different to any other form of communication and is something,
what makes the UseNet unique.
Those e.g. 'malicious governments' would had this shut-down long ago,
supposed that would be possible.
But the UseNet is actually a part from the TCP/IP protocol stack and
similar to the e-mail protocols.
This can only be removed, if the internet protocols would be written
entirely new.
But that is next to impossible, because of the zillions of devices using
these protocols.
TH
Yeah, that's pretty accurate.
My recent podcasts include "natural infinities", "natural continua", "continuous media", "continuous manifold(s)".
https://www.youtube.com/@rossfinlayson
These gigabytes of videos have that my tens and tens of thousands
of plain-text posts fit, fully, in less than one of them.
On 12/21/2024 10:50 PM, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Donnerstag000019, 19.12.2024 um 09:14 schrieb Mild Shock:
Which is ironic, since Googl Groups got shot
down, and many Newsgroup servers have a limited
retention time anyway. So large posts have not
any Search Engine Optimization (SEO) advantage at all.
At best you can use Newsgroups as a public
notebook now for short time communication over USENET,
where pages get automatically erased after a while.
This is actually wrong, since UseNet content is copied to other
datebases very often.
For instance: many 'forums' on the Web are actually not filled by lively
discussions over the web, but are copies from the UseNet.
Also private copies do exist and are often filled into database
programs, which are hosted on privately owned hardware.
All of these copies are independent from each other and also from their
sources in the UseNet.
In effect UseNet content can never be removed from the face of the Earth
entirely, once it is written.
It can actually last longer than the pyramids and can never be removed
by, say, malicious governments or similar.
But the server themselves store only a limited subset from the UseNet
traffic. But this does not say, that anything could vanish, just because
it isn't in the database of the UseNet servers anymore.
This is different to any other form of communication and is something,
what makes the UseNet unique.
Those e.g. 'malicious governments' would had this shut-down long ago,
supposed that would be possible.
But the UseNet is actually a part from the TCP/IP protocol stack and
similar to the e-mail protocols.
This can only be removed, if the internet protocols would be written
entirely new.
But that is next to impossible, because of the zillions of devices using
these protocols.
Yeah, that's pretty accurate.
On 22/12/2024 20:57, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 12/21/2024 10:50 PM, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Donnerstag000019, 19.12.2024 um 09:14 schrieb Mild Shock:
Which is ironic, since Googl Groups got shot
down, and many Newsgroup servers have a limited
retention time anyway. So large posts have not
any Search Engine Optimization (SEO) advantage at all.
At best you can use Newsgroups as a public
notebook now for short time communication over USENET,
where pages get automatically erased after a while.
This is actually wrong, since UseNet content is copied to other
datebases very often.
For instance: many 'forums' on the Web are actually not filled by lively >>> discussions over the web, but are copies from the UseNet.
Also private copies do exist and are often filled into database
programs, which are hosted on privately owned hardware.
All of these copies are independent from each other and also from their
sources in the UseNet.
In effect UseNet content can never be removed from the face of the Earth >>> entirely, once it is written.
It can actually last longer than the pyramids and can never be removed >>> by, say, malicious governments or similar.
But the server themselves store only a limited subset from the UseNet
traffic. But this does not say, that anything could vanish, just because >>> it isn't in the database of the UseNet servers anymore.
This is different to any other form of communication and is something,
what makes the UseNet unique.
Those e.g. 'malicious governments' would had this shut-down long ago,
supposed that would be possible.
But the UseNet is actually a part from the TCP/IP protocol stack and
similar to the e-mail protocols.
This can only be removed, if the internet protocols would be written
entirely new.
But that is next to impossible, because of the zillions of devices using >>> these protocols.
Yeah, that's pretty accurate.
Pretty accurately not even wrong.
You spamming cunts and true paladins of the shithole for everybody.
I do wish you all happy holidays and an ass cancer.
*Plonk*
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
| Uptime: | 42:38:56 |
| Calls: | 12,110 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 15,008 |
| Messages: | 6,518,431 |