• What is the interval between =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=84=95=20and=20=CF=89=20when=

    From WM@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 7 08:38:56 2024
    Consider the set {1, 2, 3, ..., ω} and multiply every element by 2 with
    the result {2, 4, 6, ..., ω*2}. What elements fall between ω and ω*2?
    What size has the interval between ℕ*2 and ω*2?

    Regards, WM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From [email protected]@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 11 08:15:12 2024
    Am Sun, 07 Apr 2024 08:38:56 +0000 schrieb WM:

    Consider the set {1, 2, 3, ..., ω} and multiply every element by 2 with
    the result {2, 4, 6, ..., ω*2}. What elements fall between ω and ω*2?
    What size has the interval between ℕ*2 and ω*2?

    Regards, WM

    \omega is not an element of |N. The second set does not contain \omega.
    -- ajh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From WM@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 11 13:49:35 2024
    Le 11/04/2024 à 10:15, [email protected] a écrit :
    Am Sun, 07 Apr 2024 08:38:56 +0000 schrieb WM:

    Consider the set {1, 2, 3, ..., ω} and multiply every element by 2 with
    the result {2, 4, 6, ..., ω*2}. What elements fall between ω and ω*2?
    What size has the interval between ℕ*2 and ω*2?

    \omega is not an element of |N.

    That is true. The question concerns the distance between both.

    The second set does not contain \omega.

    But it contains ω*2.

    Regards, WM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mikko@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 12 10:51:04 2024
    On 2024-04-11 13:49:35 +0000, WM said:

    Le 11/04/2024 à 10:15, [email protected] a écrit :
    Am Sun, 07 Apr 2024 08:38:56 +0000 schrieb WM:

    Consider the set {1, 2, 3, ..., ω} and multiply every element by 2 with >>> the result {2, 4, 6, ..., ω*2}. What elements fall between ω and ω*2? >>> What size has the interval between ℕ*2 and ω*2?

    \omega is not an element of |N.

    That is true. The question concerns the distance between both.

    The second set does not contain \omega.

    But it contains ω*2.

    What size has the interval from sweet to blue?

    --
    Mikko

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From WM@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 13 12:13:07 2024
    Le 12/04/2024 à 09:51, Mikko a écrit :
    On 2024-04-11 13:49:35 +0000, WM said:

    Le 11/04/2024 à 10:15, [email protected] a écrit :
    Am Sun, 07 Apr 2024 08:38:56 +0000 schrieb WM:

    Consider the set {1, 2, 3, ..., ω} and multiply every element by 2 with >>>> the result {2, 4, 6, ..., ω*2}. What elements fall between ω and ω*2? >>>> What size has the interval between ℕ*2 and ω*2?

    \omega is not an element of |N.

    That is true. The question concerns the distance between both.

    The second set does not contain \omega.

    But it contains ω*2.

    What size has the interval from sweet to blue?

    Are they points on the ordinal axis?

    Regards, WM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mikko@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 13 17:48:20 2024
    On 2024-04-13 12:13:07 +0000, WM said:

    Le 12/04/2024 à 09:51, Mikko a écrit :
    On 2024-04-11 13:49:35 +0000, WM said:

    Le 11/04/2024 à 10:15, [email protected] a écrit :
    Am Sun, 07 Apr 2024 08:38:56 +0000 schrieb WM:

    Consider the set {1, 2, 3, ..., ω} and multiply every element by 2 with >>>>> the result {2, 4, 6, ..., ω*2}. What elements fall between ω and ω*2? >>>>> What size has the interval between ℕ*2 and ω*2?

    \omega is not an element of |N.

    That is true. The question concerns the distance between both.

    The second set does not contain \omega.

    But it contains ω*2.

    What size has the interval from sweet to blue?

    Are they points on the ordinal axis?

    Regards, WM

    No, sweet, blue, and ℕ are not points on the ordinal axis.

    --
    Mikko

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From WM@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 14 18:08:28 2024
    Le 13/04/2024 à 16:48, Mikko a écrit :
    On 2024-04-13 12:13:07 +0000, WM said:

    \omega is not an element of |N.

    That is true. The question concerns the distance between both.

    The second set does not contain \omega.

    But it contains ω*2.

    What size has the interval from sweet to blue?

    Are they points on the ordinal axis?

    No, sweet, blue, and ℕ are not points on the ordinal axis.

    But ω and all elements of ℕ are points on the ordinal axis.

    Regards, WM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Damon@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 14 15:25:29 2024
    On 4/14/24 2:08 PM, WM wrote:
    Le 13/04/2024 à 16:48, Mikko a écrit :
    On 2024-04-13 12:13:07 +0000, WM said:

    \omega is not an element of |N.

    That is true. The question concerns the distance between both.

    The second set does not contain \omega.

    But it contains ω*2.

    What size has the interval from sweet to blue?

    Are they points on the ordinal axis?

    No, sweet, blue, and ℕ are not points on the ordinal axis.

    But ω and all elements of ℕ are points on the ordinal axis.

    Regards, WM

    ω only exist on that TRANSFINITE ordinal axis, not the finite ordinal axis.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From WM@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 15 11:36:22 2024
    Le 14/04/2024 à 21:25, Richard Damon a écrit :
    On 4/14/24 2:08 PM, WM wrote:
    Le 13/04/2024 à 16:48, Mikko a écrit :
    On 2024-04-13 12:13:07 +0000, WM said:

    \omega is not an element of |N.

    That is true. The question concerns the distance between both.

    The second set does not contain \omega.

    But it contains ω*2.

    What size has the interval from sweet to blue?

    Are they points on the ordinal axis?

    No, sweet, blue, and ℕ are not points on the ordinal axis.

    But ω and all elements of ℕ are points on the ordinal axis.

    ω only exist on that TRANSFINITE ordinal axis, not the finite ordinal axis.

    Some ordinal numbers of the beginning of the sequence (with k, m, n 
    ) are:

    0, 1, 2, 3, ..., ,  + 1, ...,  + k, ...,  +  (= 2), 2 + 1, ..., k, ..., k + m, ...,  (= 2), 2
    + 1, ..., 2 + , ..., 2 + k + m, ..., 22, ...,
    2k + m + n, ..., 3 + 2k + m + n, ..., k,
    .., ,  + 1, ..., k, ..., +1, +1 + 1,
    .., k, ..., 2, ..., , ...,  (=
    0), 0 + 1, ..., 00, ..., 000, ...,
    000 (= 1), 1 + 1, ..., 111 (=
    2), ..., 1, ... .

    Better readable in Transfinity, https://www.hs-augsburg.de/~mueckenh/Transfinity/Transfinity/pdf, p.42.

    Regards, WM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Damon@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 17 19:49:19 2024
    On 4/15/24 7:36 AM, WM wrote:
    Le 14/04/2024 à 21:25, Richard Damon a écrit :
    On 4/14/24 2:08 PM, WM wrote:
    Le 13/04/2024 à 16:48, Mikko a écrit :
    On 2024-04-13 12:13:07 +0000, WM said:

    \omega is not an element of |N.

    That is true. The question concerns the distance between both.

    The second set does not contain \omega.

    But it contains ω*2.

    What size has the interval from sweet to blue?

    Are they points on the ordinal axis?

    No, sweet, blue, and ℕ are not points on the ordinal axis.

    But ω and all elements of ℕ are points on the ordinal axis.

    ω only exist on that TRANSFINITE ordinal axis, not the finite ordinal
    axis.

    Some ordinal numbers of the beginning of the sequence (with k, m, n  ) are:

    0, 1, 2, 3, ..., ,  + 1, ...,  + k, ...,  +  (= 2), 2 + 1, ...,
    k, ..., k + m, ...,  (= 2), 2 + 1, ..., 2 + , ..., 2 + k +
    m, ..., 22, ..., 2k + m + n, ..., 3 + 2k + m + n, ..., k,
    .., ,  + 1, ..., k, ..., +1, +1 + 1, .., k, ..., 2, ...,
    , ...,  (= 0), 0 + 1, ..., 00, ..., 000, ..., 000
    (= 1), 1 + 1, ..., 111 (= 2), ..., 1, ... .

    Better readable in Transfinity, https://www.hs-augsburg.de/~mueckenh/Transfinity/Transfinity/pdf, p.42.

    Regards, WM


    Just shows you don't understand what you are talking about.


    For instance, the representation of all pairs of natural numbers is ω^2,
    not 2^w.

    Cantor shows that w^2 is in the same size class as ω, but 2^ω is in a
    higher size class.

    Of course, since you logic can't handle infinite sets, all the
    "contradictions" you try to point out are just proofs that you logic
    can't handle the sets, not that there is something inherently wrong with Cantor's argument. (You just reject the base logic he presumes to be using).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)