The simple way around this is to understand that
self-contradictory inputs are invalid.
On 3/1/2024 5:27 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-03-01 03:32:44 +0000, olcott said:
The simple way around this is to understand that
self-contradictory inputs are invalid.
They are not unless the problem statements say so. What is or is
not a valid input is specified in the problem statement. Your
opinions don't matter.
The correct philosophical foundation of the notion of truth
itself proves that epistemological antinomies have no truth
value because they are not truth bearers proves that they are
outside of the domain of decision problems.
People that learn by rote memorization never pay any attention
to the coherence or incoherence of what they learned by rote.
On 3/2/2024 5:24 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-03-01 17:09:46 +0000, olcott said:
On 3/1/2024 5:27 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-03-01 03:32:44 +0000, olcott said:
The simple way around this is to understand that
self-contradictory inputs are invalid.
They are not unless the problem statements say so. What is or is
not a valid input is specified in the problem statement. Your
opinions don't matter.
The correct philosophical foundation of the notion of truth
itself proves that epistemological antinomies have no truth
value because they are not truth bearers proves that they are
outside of the domain of decision problems.
That does not contradict what I said above.
Yes it does. it is generically the case that every input
to a decision problem either has a correct yes/no answer
or this input is outside of the domain of this decider.
On 3/4/2024 8:46 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-03-02 18:06:01 +0000, olcott said:
On 3/2/2024 5:24 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-03-01 17:09:46 +0000, olcott said:
On 3/1/2024 5:27 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-03-01 03:32:44 +0000, olcott said:
The simple way around this is to understand that
self-contradictory inputs are invalid.
They are not unless the problem statements say so. What is or is
not a valid input is specified in the problem statement. Your
opinions don't matter.
The correct philosophical foundation of the notion of truth
itself proves that epistemological antinomies have no truth
value because they are not truth bearers proves that they are
outside of the domain of decision problems.
That does not contradict what I said above.
Yes it does. it is generically the case that every input
to a decision problem either has a correct yes/no answer
or this input is outside of the domain of this decider.
No, it doesn't. It is generically the case that the domain
is what the problem specification says. If you leave anything
out of the domain you will have at most a partial solution,
not the solution of the problem.
I have reversed my position on this.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 01:59:01 |
| Calls: | 12,098 |
| Calls today: | 6 |
| Files: | 15,003 |
| Messages: | 6,517,868 |