1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.LOGIC

  • Re: Why do we fail (as we seem to have) to come up with the holy grail

    From Khong Dong@21:1/5 to Khong Dong on Wed Nov 1 22:03:48 2023
    On Monday, 9 October 2023 at 12:25:09 UTC-6, Khong Dong wrote:
    On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 17:50:54 UTC-6, Khong Dong wrote:

    https://qr.ae/py01BO
    I've provided an answer here:

    https://qr.ae/pKNiB8

    but that's just a preliminary and is subject to further elaboration.

    Fyi., I've updated my answer (https://qr.ae/pKNiB8) with more details on "The Blueprint" section:

    <quote>

    The Blueprint

    The blueprint for formalizing xAI (explainable AI) is a layer (denoted here by Reference) of cumulative mathematical theory templates in the Quora answer here.

    We could note in Reference two relevant theorems “Section II — Meta Theorems (MT)”:

    MT1 - Mortal Theorem.
    MT2 - Alignment Impossibility (AI) Theorem.

    The first one (MT1) connotes that in general, all things considered, any two cognitive agents (human, alien, machine) are equally of mortal intelligence; the second one (MT2) that, in general, AI alignment is not logically possible.

    </quote

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Khong Dong@21:1/5 to Khong Dong on Tue Nov 7 22:12:32 2023
    On Wednesday, 1 November 2023 at 23:03:50 UTC-6, Khong Dong wrote:
    On Monday, 9 October 2023 at 12:25:09 UTC-6, Khong Dong wrote:
    On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 17:50:54 UTC-6, Khong Dong wrote:

    https://qr.ae/py01BO
    I've provided an answer here:

    https://qr.ae/pKNiB8

    but that's just a preliminary and is subject to further elaboration.
    Fyi., I've updated my answer (https://qr.ae/pKNiB8) with more details on "The Blueprint" section:

    <quote>

    The Blueprint

    The blueprint for formalizing xAI (explainable AI) is a layer (denoted here by Reference) of cumulative mathematical theory templates in the Quora answer here.

    We could note in Reference two relevant theorems “Section II — Meta Theorems (MT)”:

    MT1 - Mortal Theorem.
    MT2 - Alignment Impossibility (AI) Theorem.

    The first one (MT1) connotes that in general, all things considered, any two cognitive agents (human, alien, machine) are equally of mortal intelligence; the second one (MT2) that, in general, AI alignment is not logically possible.

    </quote

    I've also added "Section III — Introspective Encryption", with the theorem :

    MT3 - Dâur (Introspective) Encryption Theorem.

    The theorem MT3 signifies that the hard problem of consciousness is one that would transcend any attempt to mathematically formalize it as a first principle. Thus it is an impossible problem.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Khong Dong@21:1/5 to Khong Dong on Tue Nov 7 22:15:52 2023
    On Tuesday, 7 November 2023 at 23:12:35 UTC-7, Khong Dong wrote:
    On Wednesday, 1 November 2023 at 23:03:50 UTC-6, Khong Dong wrote:
    On Monday, 9 October 2023 at 12:25:09 UTC-6, Khong Dong wrote:
    On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 17:50:54 UTC-6, Khong Dong wrote:

    https://qr.ae/py01BO
    I've provided an answer here:

    https://qr.ae/pKNiB8

    but that's just a preliminary and is subject to further elaboration.
    Fyi., I've updated my answer (https://qr.ae/pKNiB8) with more details on "The Blueprint" section:

    <quote>

    The Blueprint

    The blueprint for formalizing xAI (explainable AI) is a layer (denoted here by Reference) of cumulative mathematical theory templates in the Quora answer here.

    We could note in Reference two relevant theorems “Section II — Meta Theorems (MT)”:

    MT1 - Mortal Theorem.
    MT2 - Alignment Impossibility (AI) Theorem.

    The first one (MT1) connotes that in general, all things considered, any two cognitive agents (human, alien, machine) are equally of mortal intelligence; the second one (MT2) that, in general, AI alignment is not logically possible.

    </quote
    I've also added "Section III — Introspective Encryption", with the theorem :

    MT3 - Dâur (Introspective) Encryption Theorem.

    The theorem MT3 signifies that the hard problem of consciousness is one that would transcend any attempt to mathematically formalize it as a first principle. Thus it is an impossible problem.

    Actually, "Section III — Introspective Encryption" is in the Reference thread: https://qr.ae/pysHMT

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)