Research that if corrobarated with more studies and controlled for coastal effects and metaanalysis, says something like: “States with higher taxes and more government expenditures tend to have lower mortality rates among middle-aged Americans,
according to new research published in PLOS One. An increase of one percentage point in state tax burden was associated with about a six percent reduction in mortality.” But the thing is how much lower mortality is produced; I have libertarian
tendencies it could be that prescriptionless metformin, and development of new longevity drugs,which could be velocitized with less government regulation, could actually be an order or even orders of magnitude greater benefit to wellness, healthspan as
well as longevity. Also, lower mortality amoung the middle aged could concentrate around things like vehicle accidents or cancer.

This says beneficial sleep is linked to 1/3 the cardiovascular problem(s), at stressed employed people, which strongly suggests I do things that cause unintterupted restful sleep; I read about sleep hygeine, perhaps I should see if that is effective.
Work stress and impaired sleep are linked to a threefold higher risk of cardiovascular death in employees with hypertension. The study included 1,959 hypertensive workers aged 25-65, without cardiovascular disease or diabetes. It also says of just sleep
effect, “those with only poor sleep had a 1.8-times higher risk”
“Sleep treatment can include:
Stimulus control therapy: training to associate the bed/bedroom with sleep and set a consistent sleep-wake schedule.
Relaxation training: progressive muscle relaxation, and reducing intrusive thoughts at bedtime that interfere with sleep.
Sleep restriction therapy: curtailing the period in bed to the time spent asleep, thereby inducing mild sleep deprivation, then lengthening sleep time.
Paradoxical intention therapy: remaining passively awake and avoiding any effort (i.e. intention) to fall asleep, thereby eliminating anxiety.”
Possibly zero drugs in the middle of the night could improve sleep as well. Tryptophan supplement might be beneficial as well. Probiotic that makes tryptophan, particularly a well engineered probiotic that just makes tryptophan in the evening, could be a
harmless cardiobeneficial sleeping pill.

This makes me wonder if ambien, which might be bad for people’s brain might cause less cardiovascular disease; not a technology, just typing things.

A study online says that plump 7 year olds have greater risk of feeling nonoptimal when they reach 11 years old; that suggests a children’s diet pill could improve the lives of children; pediatric metformin is one beneficial thing where research
supports metformin producing weight loss. Also, make a bunch of chemical variants of metformin and find out if any have weight loss effects greater than metformin’s ANother possibility, that would benefit from research, which might already exist, as
to if ADD treating stimulants cause two simultaneous benefits to children: Heightened focus, and possibly higher school achievement among the mentally well (non ADD) population as well as beneficial weight loss and possibly mood lifting at the 7-11 year
olds that are feeling nonoptimal. It is my perception that stimulant ADD medication is well tolerated among children.

Technology: magnetic coated wires could improve motor and generator efficiency is a possible new-to-me application of, “the scientists observed a quantum effect revealing the potential to control certain qualities of the metal’s magnetism by spinning
electrons one direction or another.” … “Magnetic damping is responsible for the various qualities of a magnetic field engineers use to turn metal alloys into storage devices, drive magnetic motors, and operate certain kinds of braking devices. “
Noting that charge flows at the surface of wires, could magnetic coatings, noting magnets have macroscale organized spin, and magnets have the ability to induce particular spins in things near them, cause some improvement to the magnetic effects of wire
winding, like those in electric motors, or power plant generators, or does the really big magnetic field produced at a motor or generator override the effect of a thin coating of supermagnet (like Neoydium Iron Boron) on wire, right at the surface where
the electrons flow? Or, is it a square of the distance thing where the field from the coating is so intense at the top 100 atoms or the like (the especially conductive part) of a wire such that the general magnetic field produced at the motor or
generator winding is actually orders of magnitude lower, being a macroscopic ambience, than that of the magnetic wire coating, and thus the macroscopic motor/generator is less effecting of the spin at the outer layer of the electrical wire, causing
magnet coated wires to have novel beneficial function.

I may have previously written about applying spintronic to catalysts, if not, that could be a technology where the catalyst is at a magnetic field or laser illuminated; I may have even seen an entire university study group that does this.

Nifty thought: warmth is like low grade IR, can some kinds of warmth or low grade IR synchronize orientation of spins at a material? Possibly at material depth, as IR would be generated throughout the bulk of a warm material. I think I read about
something like “coherent warmth” (Economist magazine possibly) so that internal IR/coherent warmth radiation might, like a laser, orient spins; this might have spintronic benefits as well; possibly spintronic warmth could effect catalysts at bulk
application without application of external magnetic fields or laser illumination. My perception is that warmth usually stochasticizes spins (warmth zaps magnets) but coherent warmth, or IR emission at the interior of a material might have a spintronic
effect. One thing notes that EM/photon fields spin is linked to circular polarization: “In addition, light can carry an intrinsic angular momentum, called spin, that is proportional to the degree of circular polarization (helicity), and aligned with
the propagation direction.” That is not looking compatible with IR or even coherent warmth spintronics, unless, like the way almost anything will forms swirls or vortices, or possibly even eddy currents at actual materials.

If I were a physicist I might immediately know if the bulk size (wavelength) of a circularly polarized (spintronics spin carrying) wave could be big, and possibly spintronic effects at large chunks of actual material; spintronic effects at the type of
radiation, like 1mm microwave, might carry and impart customized spin at big 1mm or larger objects. It seems possible. One possibility is circularly polarized/spintronic producing microwaves improving catalysts, chemical reactions, or increasing or
customizing chemical reaction yield at seperate products (like they a making a particular chemical, but the reaction produces three chemicals; Big 1mm microwave spintronics/catalysis/some other thing then effects the amounts of which chemicals are
produced at a chemical reaction)

Noting there are people, scientists and technologists, on the internet that link spintronics to catalysis perhaps an electric spintronic vehicle catalytic converter might be possible; notably many things would be cheaper than precious metal catalysts

Nifty thought: evanescent wave producing structures might transport, distribute, or couple spintronics effects at two or more materials; I read two prisms slightly apart can share photons as an evansecent wave effect (I read about two wax prisms
affecting microwaves with an amazing 1mm gap non-optical path between the wax prisms), so can spin effects travel as evansecent waves across actual air or vacuum gaps between materials? I just read that evanescent waves can have spin, “Researchers
found that evanescent waves carry momentum and spin components that are orthogonal to the direction of wave propagation. Moreover, the transverse spin turns out to be independent of polarization and helicity, while the transverse momentum is proportional
to the wave helicity”
New-to-me spintronic chemistry could be effected at millimeter or greater distances if evanescent spintronics is possible. novel catalysis at/from container walls imparting spin to chemicals as well as catalysts at the sides of a container which have
something analogous to evanescent wave gap-passing energy; the spin customization magnets or lasers or some other thing would be on the exterior of the chemical container while using evanescent wave effects to do spintronics on the stuff in the container.
There is a slight chance that bubble trays at petroleum refining could have some shape where the spintronic catalyst effect is evanescent-wave stimulated from photons or magnetics or some other thing at the interior of the bubble tray. The spintronic
stuff migrates through the surface of the tray as an evansecent wave.

Mathematics is nifty, “light can carry an intrinsic angular momentum, called spin, that is proportional to the degree of circular polarization (helicity)” is an actual observed 3d+t effect, noting there is math of things like 4d hyperspheres, it
seems like there is likely math of 4d helicity; would that carry even more information than electron/photon spin or have novel effects/characteristics? It seems possible to use math to predict what those novel effects of 4D helicity would be and then
search for them at actual matter or energy materials. Noting that DQCE affects the t of 3d+t it is possible that a 4th dimensional effect of some kind could be found with the math of higher dimensionality at polarization of waves, among them circularly
polarized waves. Another nifty math thing is whether waves and polarizations have different things like automatic nodality (like a circumference of a sphere might be nonself-interacting and absent automatic nodality, but a circumference on a blobby maxi
pad (solid saddle curve) might automatically generate nodes or antinodes; along with different nodality there could be “size prescribes characteristics thing” or group of effects at different math shapes, like at a torus, or that wobbly thing that
is not a sphere; sort of like along with the actual wavelength of the radiation/light travelling at it as amth thing, the diameter of the torus would impart a new defined thing about light or other energy “because it has to fit on the different
simultaneous things at a torus”; the torus, unlike the sphere, having two or three different ways to have a circle wrapped around a diameter (circle the top of the torus with your finger; make the OK finger thing around the tube of the torus, and also
the smaller diameter circle at the core of the torus), another math shape with a 4d version could be anything with “curl” like water spinning in a glass or a vortex, or even the U shaped two connected vortexes at a distance from each other I saw at a
youtube video where a person made one moving a plate in water;
Technology applications of these things are: compared to a sphere model, at a torus there would be more intinsic separable states or characteristics at an actual physical material; magnetisim arises from chunks of spins, so chunks full of inner torus
diameter actual optimized materials could be different from those materials optimized for outer torus circumference; there could even be materials modelled and created around the ration of inner and outer diameters at a torus; at a curl/vortex/ U or n
shaped twin vortex there could be say the distance between the distal parts of the n shaped vortex as a modelled and created actual material characteristic.

Another possibility is that some of the nifty new math suggested physical effects of 4d versions of spin and helicity are 3d maps,possibly called projections, of 4d structures; sort of like that bubble-nested squares 3d thing that is one view of a 4d
hypercube, there could be technologyizable actual 3d math shapes that are like the projections of 4d circular polarization or helicity. Rotini antenna: perhaps rather than a circular polarization antenna looking like a line or possibly a circle, the 3d
projection of a 4d helicity might look like a rotini, notably having at least some of the beneficial technologyizable effects and characteristics suggested from the math of 4d circular polarization. Like perhaps the 3d projections of 4d hyper circular
polarization could contain more bits of information, or has really good partial transmission-figure-out-what-is-says anyway; another nifty possible technology is the 3d projection of 4d helicity at laser tractor beams; I read that, something, possibly a
volumetric shape made of circularly polarized light swirls and curls at physical particles to move them around, I might have read laser tractor beams were used on things near 1mm size; so is there a 3d projection of a 4d circular polarization that might
do something technologically new at laser tractor beans? the 4d math of hypercircular polarization could suggest new characteristics or effect that could then be beneficial as technologies.

A new form of electricity might be possible; online it says, “Scientists already knew that light waves have an electric field that can rotate as they propagate, which is known as the polarization property of light, and that light waves carry momentum
in their direction of motion. In new findings, researchers have discovered a "spin-momentum locking," meaning, for example, light waves that spin in a counterclockwise direction can only move forward, and vice versa.” https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/
releases/2016/Q1/spinning-light-waves-might-be-locked-for-photonics-technologies.html ; electrons have spin, so if this directionalizing effect also affects electrons it might be possible to make unidirectional electrons; like getting the function of a
diode without a diode, a technology and physics thing is that some kinds of computer logic can be built with diodes, so it is possible the electrons could be the computer. A spin-momentum-directionalizer that works at electrons might be possible to make
sandwiches out of creating a new kind of transistor where the EM fields overlap and the electrons are the transistor; that makes the electrons the entire computer, and as frequently mentioned, multifunction turing complete computers are described
previously.

Some kind of thing is already known at electrons, “momentum of light analogous in many ways to the case of spin-momentum locking which occurs for electrons”

Atoms have spin; what is the effect of spin-momentum-directionalizing on atoms? Groups of atoms? New materials; chemistry?

Thinking about ways to make spintronics devices and technologies super affordable: there are a couple things that occur: comminuting chunks of some material rather than growing them semiconductor style or reacting them quantum dot style is a thought. Is
there anything that could be made that when ground up would have beneficial spintronic effects and applications? Another way to make spintronic things ultraffordable is spintronic polymers and plastics; it is possible that electret and piezoelectric
plastics/polymers could be custom-structured to do something spintronic and super affordably mass produced; also when I think of the piezoelectric polymer PVDF it seems like a physical action causes electrons to pile up in one physical area; is it
possible to make a piezoelectric polymer that generates concentrated charge from warmth fluctuations (like brownian warmth) alone without a mechanical stimulus? That could supply electrons, or at least a surface of charge, to be used at the spintronic
part This is a spintronic technology/material without wiring, batteries, photovoltaic elements, or dissimilar elements. A spintronic part without wiring could be cheaper than one with wiring and lasers. Electrets are plastics with location-fixed
electrical charge, could a =O bulb terminal or | planar thing concentrate charge so it is right next to another spintronic thing or device? Sort of plane of circular polarized electrons, or a bulb of oriented spin domains, I perceive arrayed spintronic
polymer might be kind of like a magnet yet made of cheap polymer - very likely much weaker than a metal magnet but still a purpose made arranged spin material. So with these grindable polymer-super affordable piezo and electret plastics that have
spintronic application, one possible application is catalyst granules that could just be added to a reaction to use less energy, go faster, or produce a better ratio of preferred products, or just possibly donate and maintain charge at a different
catlyst material or molecule (sort of like that two chemical sunscreen after UV regenerator chemistry)

I have not read about materials where you put the spin-customized electrons into them.

spintronic proteins, or polymers could have cytoplasm uptake and do some spintronic thing inside cytes, possibly gathering data or normalizing some cytoprocess at young weller levels.

impression electron motion, notably at magnets comes from background warmth; static

.5b It has likely been studied : beneficial technology effect of a big magnetic fields on “crystal pulling” when growing crystals and things like pure Si or Ge wafer-source material synthetically. I have heard of things called paramagnetic effects
and even at water diamagnetism is strong enough to visibly bend the water, so making the pulled crystal minimally bent could be possible with magnets at crystal pulling. Really high effectiveness at going non-bendy might give a smooth monotamic surface.

Do electret plastics (or even spintronic surface ultraffordable plastic granules) custom surface charge have any effect on the velocity of evaporation? wettability might be adjustable, if you give a 3 volt electret static field on a piece of plastic a 1
volt nudge, does some water-water dipole net disruption, or possibly particle (brownian motion-like) velocity that needs 4 volts of velocity for water to break free of a surface happen from water-water dipole disruption causing vapor to leave a liquid
covered surface? One application could be drying things on electret polymer surfaces, or imagining a O=O electret or piezoelectric belt between two rollers, when a belt made of piezoelectric plastic meets the rollers the interaction causes electron
mobility, giving the 1v nudge. It is possible this way of drying things could use less energy; applications at crop drying could be beneficial. The energy balance does not seem to make sense, but the 3 v base and 1v nudge thing seems like it could
encourage water accumulation as well, possibly improving humidifying/dehumidifying machines. Perhaps a really really hydrophobic polymer (possibly even with negative contact angle surface) that is an electret that attracts water microdroplets, just like
it would attarct dust, would keep shiny and drylike while streaming water from its surface, producing water, or just dehumidifying a space. Might functiona at swamp coolers as well.

saving energy at air coolers and refrigerators: If electrets repel one charge variety of dust but attract another then whichever electret that attracts the kind of dust that is less frequent could be coated on the radiative coils of the cooler so they
would quantifiably gunk-up less.

Entertaining material: the 1 meter long quantum tunneling material: I read a thing online that mentioned quantum tunneling through an insulator with like 1 or 2nm mentioned online as having ok post-tunnel usable energy after tunneling. Now with a
conductor rather than insulator the electron just traverses the bulk material, so it seems possible that between insulator and conductor there is a partial conductor, even a nanoarray of metal atoms (anything from spaced monoatomic to spaced clusters of
a few hundred or thousand metal atoms) mixed with filler, possibly something better than a ceramic, such that at the combination material that would be such a poor conductor that the majority of electrons got to the distal side from quantum tunneling (
Note the thing midway between conductor and insulator is electron mobility smooth; this is completely different than a bandgap semiconductor)

Although, rather than a metal-ceramic mix,which I kind of think would do a lot of non-tunneling quantum level elevating hops, something like a fancy polymer could be a meter-long quantum tunneling material; it seems like a pleasant moment to mention two
electron systems like chlorophyll, so perhaps a chlorophyll mer-polymer would, completely without being a bandgap semiconductor, be a really mid-value insulator and conductor simultaneously; I do not know if it is plausible, but a polymer with niftily-
spaced mer-molecules causing easy-short distance between polymer molecules that are then easy-short for multiple sequential hops of quantum tunneling to occur could be a way to make the quantum tunneling material that is sort of between, yet neither of,
conductor and insulator. So at the meter long polychlorophyll meter-long form the polymer strings are really near each other for quantum tunneling and the stuff is neither a conductor or insulator, but would conduct electrons through many eentsy polymer
string -to- polymer string quantum tunneling events sequentially. There is a thought though: why would the quantum tunneling occur in a particular direction, rather than just stochastically throughout the material? It could be that channel and lane
anisotropy at the chlorophyll polymer, sort of like cross-country skis or a bunch of engineered polymer things where the polymer is quantum-tunneling bulky on the sides, and quantum-tunneling favoring thin at the preferred stream direction; something
like a lane where the center stream has much higher quantum tunneling likelihood than the sides; as a polymer this reminds me of the trees produced at some linear computational automata images I have seen, a bunch of branched valleys that accumulate
water (electrons) to produce a high volume single stream.

So the chlorophyll polymer thing might function, unless of course a vacuum is the least trouble to quantum-tunnel through thing, then the vacuum would be the long quantum tunnel material, and the math that says how far an electron is likely to hop in a
vacuum gives the distribution of chronologically happening observable quantum tunneling events. It at least seems like the polychlorophyll might be less tunnelable than vacuum; then again I read something about how a published researcher looked at
quantum effects propagating through DNA and found some, and that they were, to my perception, seeming high velocity to the researcher.


Perhaps really cold still liquid argon with some metal atoms in it might work as a noninsulator<-> nonconductor. Well it was entertaining to think about but I think I figured out why the footlong quantum tunneling material will not work: At a
conducting metal none of the electrons are raised to higher emissions quantum levels, but at an insulator, at least the kinds I am thinking of now, they have a high energy “breakdown voltage” that is kind of like hopping up the energy (dubiously:
electron volts?) which reminds me of the electrons hopping up to an emissions spectral level to where they saturate something like a crystal of ceramic causing electrons to flow anyway. um, dielectric breakdown might be a quantum-hop-up level for the
insulator (crystal ceramic) until enough electrons are up there to move around. so the metal conductor might be thought of as omitting quantum level changing

Although, rather than a metal-ceramic mix something like a fancy polymer could be a meter-long quantum tunneling material; it seems like a pleasant moment to mention two electron systems like chlorophyll, so perhaps a chlorophyll polymer would,
completely without being a bandgap semiconductor, be a really mid-value insulator and conductor simultaneously; I do not know if it is plausible, but a polymer with niftily-spaced mer-molecules causing easy-short distance between polymer molecules that
are easy-short for multiple sequential hops of quantum tunneling to occur could be a way to make the quantum tunneling material that is sort of between, yet neither of, conductor and insulator. So at the meter long polychlorophyll meter-long form the
polymer strings are really near each other and the stuff is neither a conductor or insulator, but would conduct electrons through many eentsy polymer string -to- polymer string quantum tunneling events sequentially. There is a thought though: why would
the quantum tunneling occur in a particular direction, rather than just stochastically throughout the material? It could be that channel and lane anisotropic width at the chlorophyll polymer, sort of like cross-country ski surfaces or a bunch of
engineered polymer things (morphologies) where the polymer is quantum-tunneling bulky on the sides, and quantum-tunneling favoring thin at the preferred stream direction; something like a lane where the center stream has much higher quantum tunneling
likelihood than the sides; as a polymer this reminds me of the trees produced at some linear computational automata images I have seen, a bunch of branched valleys that accumulate water (electrons) to produce a high volume single stream.

another thing about the dendritic tree-like computation automata images is that at an engineered polymer you could have differently spaced branches for the electrons to quantum tunnel to at hops; the branches are nearer and further from the most recent
electron-place, so at the near branch the likelihood is say 1/3, but at the far branch it is 1/9 all the polymer’s physical and actual distance of branches together as a probability would be engineered to be (near) one.

So the chlorophyll polymer thing might function, unless of course a vacuum is the least trouble to quantum-tunnel through thing, then the vacuum would be the long quantum tunnel material, and the math that says how far an electron is likely to hop in a
vacuum gives the distribution of chronologically happening human perspective observable quantum tunneling events. It at least seems like the polychlorophyll might be less tunnelable than vacuum; then again I read something about how a published
researcher looked at quantum effects propagating through DNA and found some, and that they were, to my perception, seeming high velocity to the researcher.

I think an actual physicist would say they are independent, but if you have something like a flash drive: quantum-tunneling container, but have two electrodes to it, to put electrons in the container, does the doubled number of electrons increase the
actual amount of energy that gets tunneled. It seems like two 1 electron volt inputs (wires) to a container would still have the combined quantum tunneling energy output as well as quantity of electrons as a one electrode system, doubled. That is the
two together are absent nudging the quantum tunneling easiness amount up or a reduction from bigger plurality of electrons. Then again, with more electrons there could be more actual electrons doing wave overlap effects, that could go nodal or antinodal.
There are many things about probability that I do not comprehend, but things where you adjust estimated likelihood from previous data (bayesian?) might have some relation to a couple conductors in a flash drive container system. Actually the measured
numbers from a quantum tunneling experiment, and the probability models that best describe then predict them, could bring new things to know and technologize, from finding ways quantum tunneling systems might be measured as having all sorts of novel
things like bayesian-like system memory, or some unexpected time distribution (poisson distribution anomaly) of the tunneling events.

Mathematics is awesome, this quantum tunneling thing makes me wonder if you can observe a physics system to observe new math (I perceive 21st century things suggest that physics look to math for effectiveness, so the idea that new math could be found
from physics is kind of nifty)


If there was some mathematically previously unpredicted amplification or even decrease in calculated quantum tunneled energy amount then that could provide more things to know about quantum tunneling systems and the technologies that can be produced
with them. Who knows perhaps there are detectable wake effects or slipstreaming with more electrons at the same energy when quantum tunneling occurs.

It seems likely others have already thought about it, but if you coat the interior of a flash memory quantum tunneling container with a ultra-thin layer of a conductor does that change the shape of the electron probability distribution in the container?
The change to the morphology of the “electron cloud” could effect quantum tunneled resultant voltage, or amount of tunneling events per chronological moment. Also rather than just a coat of conductor at the flash drive container technologists could
put varied shapes on the sides of the flash drive quantum tunneling container, some kind of repeating “wallpaper” could have some sort of reliability increasing effect from shaping the electron cloud/3d spatial electron probability distribution. So
besides flash drives, which I read are more a previous thing and that the physical structures of Intel’s Optane are better than flash memory.


nifty math thing to know would be 4d topology of these other forms.


I like non-cement building materials better, as a technology though it might be possible to make cement more affordably and with fewer emissions, as well as to mitigate the appearence of cement or premade cinder block construction.

Vertical grasscrete as a possible visually ameliorating, or if it worked well, actively aesthetically perceived as more appealing than vinyl/polymer siding on things made of, or having structural cement; grass and airplants; nutrient enriched cement at
grasscrete would grow algae and or moss making the cement turn green and blend in with the actual living plants at vertical grasscrete.

Highmountain phong shading/ray tracing neural networks faster way to find global and local maxima and minima at neural networks, software and AI

I do not know much, but I read things about fitting models to data at things like artificial intelligence and machine learning with names like “deep learning”; I perceive one of the ways data can be viewed, or mathematically considered is kind of
like a topological map, with local maxima and minima that can sometimes make software not seek different more actual or accurate maxima or minima. Sort of like the software going to the top of a building instead of the top of a mountain because perhaps
the software would have to notice and iterate through many things less tall than the building prior to reaching the mountain. That colloquial description, reminds me of the possible benefit to software and artificial intelligence of having a highest
view so that a variety of possible paths can be looked at simultaneously to find an optimal one; as a human it is possible to visually view a topology and tell which parts are highest. Computationally I am reminded of the software grabbing a high
vantage point then doing ray tracing on every feature at a landscape; from the high vantage point this would provide the actual maxima and minima of a topologically graphed data set, without the software nonoptimally perceiving a local minima or maxima
as the system minima and maxima.


[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)