I can put a resistor after a voltage that's too high for the circuit?

Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

Thanks.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2021-01-30, John Doe <[email protected]> wrote:

I can put a resistor after a voltage that's too high for the circuit?

Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

If the capacitor is needed there probably are problems.

In the spirit of your question that is all I will say.
--
Jasen.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

John Doe <[email protected]> wrote:

I can put a resistor after a voltage that's too high for the circuit?

Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have a
variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Rich wrote:

John Doe wrote:

I can put a resistor after a voltage that's too high for the circuit?

Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have a
variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.

If it's a big capacitor, the voltage variation is minimal?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

John Doe <[email protected]> wrote:

Rich wrote:

John Doe wrote:

I can put a resistor after a voltage that's too high for the circuit?

Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have a
variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.

If it's a big capacitor, the voltage variation is minimal?

No, the size of the capacitor simply determines the rate at which the
voltage changes. Given a current draw change of sufficient length in
time (length determined by capicator size), the voltage across the
capacitor will settle to that which remains after the new drop across
the resistor.

Wire up a test circuit on a breadboard and measure the changes
yourself.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Rich <[email protected]d> wrote:

John Doe wrote:

Rich wrote:

John Doe wrote:

I can put a resistor after a voltage that's too high for the circuit?

Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have a
variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.

If it's a big capacitor, the voltage variation is minimal?

No, the size of the capacitor simply determines the rate at which the
voltage changes.

Then your answer should be "Yes", given the same amount of time.

Why are you fighting this?

Do you think it makes you look smart?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

John Doe <[email protected]> wrote:

Rich <[email protected]d> wrote:

John Doe wrote:

Rich wrote:

John Doe wrote:

I can put a resistor after a voltage that's too high for the
circuit?

Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have
a variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.

If it's a big capacitor, the voltage variation is minimal?

No, the size of the capacitor simply determines the rate at which
the voltage changes.

Then your answer should be "Yes", given the same amount of time.

No, the correct answer is "no". The voltage variation can be
substantial. Rate of change is a different measure than voltage
magnitude.

Why are you fighting this?

Note that I could ask you the same question. My answer is correct,
yours is incorrect.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: free.spam

No, thanks anyway...

--
Rich <[email protected]d> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Rich <[email protected]d>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:59:53 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <rv9519$1l9$[email protected]>
References: <rv455v$6ho$[email protected]> <rv4oh1$cfb$[email protected]> <rv6617$2rs$[email protected]> <rv6ijs$qed$[email protected]> <rv8ogi$sku$[email protected]>
Injection-Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:59:53 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d71d69244b44f2167a5474a852a92cea"; logging-data="1705"; mail-complaints-to="[email protected]"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18WDlUwqnHhTSdJSoCqQnVy"
User-Agent: tin/2.0.1-20111224 ("Achenvoir") (UNIX) (Linux/3.10.17 (x86_64)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:LBNwrlosj8h+C/mmb8/JDn9V+kU=
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55501

John Doe <[email protected]> wrote:

Rich <[email protected]d> wrote:

John Doe wrote:

Rich wrote:

John Doe wrote:

I can put a resistor after a voltage that's too high for the
circuit?

Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have
a variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.

If it's a big capacitor, the voltage variation is minimal?

No, the size of the capacitor simply determines the rate at which
the voltage changes.

Then your answer should be "Yes", given the same amount of time.

No, the correct answer is "no". The voltage variation can be
substantial. Rate of change is a different measure than voltage
magnitude.

Why are you fighting this?

Note that I could ask you the same question. My answer is correct,
yours is incorrect.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: free.spam

On 2/02/2021 4:11 am, John Doe wrote:

No, thanks anyway...

So bugger off and do it know it all.You don't need advice from us humble mortals !!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: free.spam

Lots of reasons for non-answers, crappy answers, and venting. When a group
is dying, for example. Non-answers are entirely understandable and no
problem with me. Normally, people answer questions because they like the question, and because they want to see their writing on USENET. Then there
are not-quite-grown-ups who love playing with an imaginary kill file
friend (they are not skilled enough to control).

This netcop wannabe troll can go fuck itself...

--
RheillyPhoull <[email protected]> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!xmission!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.westnet.com.au!news.westnet.com.au.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 19:55:35 -0600
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics,free.spam
References: <rv455v$6ho$[email protected]> <rv4oh1$cfb$[email protected]> <rv6617$2rs$[email protected]> <rv6ijs$qed$[email protected]> <rv8ogi$sku$[email protected]> <rv9519$1l9$[email protected]> <rv9na2$thk$[email protected]>
From: RheillyPhoull <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:55:34 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <rv9na2$thk$[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Lines: 5
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 106.69.177.15
X-Trace: sv3-FcLxUF6QNWGWX0JZWCAqzZeFnCSRzIQzxdQPKKU/ouvaIlWI81kWv1URdSDv8QPTWUxiVuwood7EFam!ntsViOraSWMiGNeU3PvZ3jmOjBPT5/oLAtbfIqEIZzAjdGLnmekbgEeq7GqPIUaiW+h0rJwIdL2y!gpMhtQDdJlzT+lDzBVi9
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1542
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55503 free.spam:14046

On 2/02/2021 4:11 am, John Doe wrote:

No, thanks anyway...

So bugger off and do it know it all.You don't need advice from us humble mortals !!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: free.spam

Lots of Australian trolls on USENET recently...

--
RheillyPhoull <[email protected]> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!xmission!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.westnet.com.au!news.westnet.com.au.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 19:55:35 -0600
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics,free.spam
References: <rv455v$6ho$[email protected]> <rv4oh1$cfb$[email protected]> <rv6617$2rs$[email protected]> <rv6ijs$qed$[email protected]> <rv8ogi$sku$[email protected]> <rv9519$1l9$[email protected]> <rv9na2$thk$[email protected]>
From: RheillyPhoull <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:55:34 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <rv9na2$thk$[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Lines: 5
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 106.69.177.15
X-Trace: sv3-FcLxUF6QNWGWX0JZWCAqzZeFnCSRzIQzxdQPKKU/ouvaIlWI81kWv1URdSDv8QPTWUxiVuwood7EFam!ntsViOraSWMiGNeU3PvZ3jmOjBPT5/oLAtbfIqEIZzAjdGLnmekbgEeq7GqPIUaiW+h0rJwIdL2y!gpMhtQDdJlzT+lDzBVi9
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1542
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55503 free.spam:14046

On 2/02/2021 4:11 am, John Doe wrote:

No, thanks anyway...

So bugger off and do it know it all.You don't need advice from us humble mortals !!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: free.spam

On 2/02/2021 2:13 pm, John Doe wrote:

Lots of Australian trolls on USENET recently...

We respond when know it all's ask non detailed questions that require description of the process involved. Not mentioning the nature of the
load shows how little you understand of the nature of your query.
On the subject of trolls, I see much more of your nick (which I assume
applies to your brain) than mine ??

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: free.spam

Australia is a small country, but in fact, of the four groups I post to, I
have encountered Australian trolls in three groups recently. There are
several in the electronics design group, the most hyperactive being "Bill Sloman". The only response to one of my recent posts in the metalworking
group is an Australian troll. And now here. Australia under pressure from communist China seems to be like Norway before World War II. Will it
continue pleading "neutrality" if communist China invades and rapes it?

--
RheillyPhoull <[email protected]> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!tr1.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.westnet.com.

au!news.westnet.com.au.POSTED!not-for-mail

NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 18:08:19 -0600
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics,free.spam
References: <rv455v$6ho$[email protected]> <rv4oh1$cfb$[email protected]> <rv6617$2rs$[email protected]> <rv6ijs$qed$[email protected]> <rv8ogi$sku$[email protected]> <rv9519$1l9$[email protected]> <rv9na2$thk$[email protected]> <mOqdnViuHfaKLIX9nZ2dnUU7-dudnZ2d@

westnet.com.au> <rvaqil$u72$[email protected]>

From: RheillyPhoull <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 08:08:19 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <rvaqil$u72$[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Lines: 8
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 106.69.177.15
X-Trace: sv3-kDO+9B5dQ3JBzQjh1Dn52x9JynhPfKQSGKE6U2TqgBR9AC0o2wSUAgPtbZNE/5VdAW+Jsyxq9Yknt1X!bpu6IZqjHbGJ8LGgUDEVwsoG55tN8taoEeC+NvW8uJxWcfpdtvYR+JAO+hcfs3qe4m+tmfXBMsox!CdUMMRt7hJHMYfk1sk/x
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1887
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55512 free.spam:14106

On 2/02/2021 2:13 pm, John Doe wrote:

Lots of Australian trolls on USENET recently...

We respond when know it all's ask non detailed questions that require description of the process involved. Not mentioning the nature of the
load shows how little you understand of the nature of your query.
On the subject of trolls, I see much more of your nick (which I assume applies to your brain) than mine ??

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: free.spam

On 4/02/2021 6:27 pm, John Doe wrote:

Australia is a small country, but in fact, of the four groups I post to, I have encountered Australian trolls in three groups recently. There are several in the electronics design group, the most hyperactive being "Bill Sloman". The only response to one of my recent posts in the metalworking group is an Australian troll. And now here. Australia under pressure from communist China seems to be like Norway before World War II. Will it
continue pleading "neutrality" if communist China invades and rapes it?

WHOOOOSSHH !!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: free.spam

Australia is a small country, but in fact, of the four groups I have
recently posted to, I have encountered Australian trolls in three. There
are several in the electronics design group, the most hyperactive being
"Bill Sloman". The only response to my recent post in the metalworking
group is an Australian troll. And now here. Australia under pressure from communist China seems to be like Norway before World War II. Will it
continue pleading "neutrality" if communist China invades and rapes it?

A troll who publicly plays with its imaginary kill file friend is almost
always technically incapable of ignoring a thread branch. So they end up stumbling over all the replies to the person that they allegedly kill
filed.

And they are always incapable of simply pressing the "ignore thread" key
when they see a post by someone they cannot cope with.

Such is the way of this silly troll and its fake kill file...

--
RheillyPhoull <[email protected]> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!xmission!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.westnet.com.au!news.westnet.com.au.POSTED!not-for-

mail

NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:46:25 -0600
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics,free.spam
References: <rv455v$6ho$[email protected]> <rv4oh1$cfb$[email protected]> <rv6617$2rs$[email protected]> <rv6ijs$qed$[email protected]> <rv8ogi$sku$[email protected]> <rv9519$1l9$[email protected]> <rv9na2$thk$[email protected]> <mOqdnViuHfaKLIX9nZ2dnUU7-dudnZ2d@

westnet.com.au> <rvaqil$u72$[email protected]> <[email protected]> <rvgi6p$gd8$[email protected]>

From: RheillyPhoull <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 07:46:24 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <rvgi6p$gd8$[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Lines: 11
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 106.69.172.78
X-Trace: sv3-HI2odCHGZXP7m00iLKhmPQukWlm+hW1csOo/uwjGFgYr53qydfJij2yCoUe8NdpVp9R0iMqelTMBcgL!8HnqOR/dYreEzjvI2U5rAjMW1oC2UrxVjhwYKWhE55AGabwHSCAKDgxzbyR0KsGA1WdamFS5gXDl!QCyTpbwe9nMWyPocYBKP
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2144
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55514 free.spam:14114

On 4/02/2021 6:27 pm, John Doe wrote:

Australia is a small country, but in fact, of the four groups I post to, I >> have encountered Australian trolls in three groups recently. There are
several in the electronics design group, the most hyperactive being "Bill
Sloman". The only response to one of my recent posts in the metalworking
group is an Australian troll. And now here. Australia under pressure from
communist China seems to be like Norway before World War II. Will it
continue pleading "neutrality" if communist China invades and rapes it?

WHOOOOSSHH !!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, February 1, 2021 at 3:26:14 AM UTC-8, John Doe wrote:

Rich <[email protected]d> wrote:

John Doe wrote:

Rich wrote:

John Doe wrote:

I can put a resistor after a voltage that's too high for the circuit? >>>>
Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have a
variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.

If it's a big capacitor, the voltage variation is minimal?

No, the size of the capacitor simply determines the rate at which the voltage changes.

Then your answer should be "Yes", given the same amount of time.

Why are you fighting this?

Do you think it makes you look smart?

Mr. Doe, Rich explained it correctly. You are wrong and he is right. How much Voltage are you trying to get rid of?

G²

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: free.spam

Bullshit...

--
Glenn Gundlach <[email protected]> wrote:

X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4349:: with SMTP id q9mr5905486qvs.23.1612554086079; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 11:41:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a4a:c602:: with SMTP id l2mr4658324ooq.5.1612554085805; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 11:41:25 -0800 (PST)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.

highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:41:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <rv8ogi$sku$[email protected]>
Complaints-To: [email protected]
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=68.96.68.241; posting-account=JX7V1wkAAAAeax67P9giUWdoKufQ8keT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.96.68.241
References: <rv455v$6ho$[email protected]> <rv4oh1$cfb$[email protected]> <rv6617$2rs$[email protected]> <rv6ijs$qed$[email protected]> <rv8ogi$sku$[email protected]>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
From: Glenn Gundlach <[email protected]>
Injection-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 19:41:26 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2383
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55516

On Monday, February 1, 2021 at 3:26:14 AM UTC-8, John Doe wrote:

Rich <[email protected]d> wrote:

John Doe wrote:

Rich wrote:

John Doe wrote:

I can put a resistor after a voltage that's too high for the circuit

?

Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have a

variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.

If it's a big capacitor, the voltage variation is minimal?

No, the size of the capacitor simply determines the rate at which the

voltage changes.

Then your answer should be "Yes", given the same amount of time.

Why are you fighting this?

Do you think it makes you look smart?

Mr. Doe, Rich explained it correctly. You are wrong and he is right. How much Voltage are you trying to get rid of?

G��

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: free.spam

On 6/02/2021 3:57 am, John Doe wrote:

Bullshit...

It displays it's technical prowess again :-) what a joke !!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: free.spam

Nothing but a troll...

--
RheillyPhoull <[email protected]> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!tr1.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.westnet.com.

au!news.westnet.com.au.POSTED!not-for-mail

NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 18:26:35 -0600
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics,free.spam
References: <rv455v$6ho$[email protected]> <rv4oh1$cfb$[email protected]> <rv6617$2rs$[email protected]> <rv6ijs$qed$[email protected]> <rv8ogi$sku$[email protected]> <[email protected]> <rvk7vh$9ur$[email protected]>
From: RheillyPhoull <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 08:26:35 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <rvk7vh$9ur$[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Lines: 4
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 106.69.172.78
X-Trace: sv3-zvpXqR0p+oDz6nJ2eb3t2IKb92KpQ58wnGCYN3s8EMsUC78ejGSZTFgLnFzYwi1yl2ZsS2w0YaEuFmS!y1oNO8zzA9rNwr+MZCBVsCzstlAOq8/zH2SeB0PSww9qmnSZdz1l0j5ROVj/+u+WF42NFL4uzTEJ!vqT/dYZyWnI5J8sUhY2Y
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1537
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55518 free.spam:14132

On 6/02/2021 3:57 am, John Doe wrote:

Bullshit...

It displays it's technical prowess again :-) what a joke !!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: free.spam

On 6/02/2021 10:47 am, John Doe wrote:

Nothing but a troll...

Takes one to recognize one oh brainless one.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Friday, February 5, 2021 at 11:51:24 PM UTC-5, RheillyPhoull wrote:

On 6/02/2021 10:47 am, John Doe wrote:

Nothing but a troll...

Takes one to recognize one oh brainless one.

You people with the off topic messages. What are you, toddlers in nursery school? Please quit ruining the Google group for everyone.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: free.spam

Nym-shifting...

--
This is not a google group <[email protected]d> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!nzqwpW7fgmak1IV6pg8vew.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: This is not a google group <[email protected]d> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 18:50:12 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <rvpcp4$179$[email protected]>
References: <rv455v$6ho$[email protected]> <rv4oh1$cfb$[email protected]> <rv6617$2rs$[email protected]> <rv6ijs$qed$[email protected]> <rv8ogi$sku$[email protected]> <[email protected]> <rvk7vh$9ur$[email protected]> <

[email protected]> <rvkvv8$t8p$[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

NNTP-Posting-Host: nzqwpW7fgmak1IV6pg8vew.user.gioia.aioe.org X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55522

Stevo <[email protected]> wrote:

Please quit ruining the Google group for everyone.

This is not a google group.

This is a Usenet news group.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet

The google groups UI simply provides an interface to the Usenet
newsgroup you are reading.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2/1/2021 5:26 AM, John Doe wrote:

Rich <[email protected]d> wrote:

John Doe wrote:

Rich wrote:

John Doe wrote:

I can put a resistor after a voltage that's too high for the circuit? >>>>>
Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have a
variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.

If it's a big capacitor, the voltage variation is minimal?

No, the size of the capacitor simply determines the rate at which the
voltage changes.

Then your answer should be "Yes", given the same amount of time.

Why are you fighting this?

Do you think it makes you look smart?

 Now you have made yourself look ignorant, which you are, otherwise you
would not have ask the question.

 Say your device needs 9V and you have a 12V source. At some point in
time you measure the current your device draws and it is

20ma, so you decide you need a series 150 ohm resistor.  You have it all figured out. Then at some point it fails to work.

At some point the motor in this device (the one you didn't explain )
turns on and the voltage drops to 4 volts causing the circuit to fail to operate.

 Do you want to calculate the capacitance needed to keep you supply
voltage within 5% of your required 9v?

Or do you want to just admit it is a big ass cap and a regulator may be
better.

On the other hand you could give us details of the circuit, so it would
not be a guessing game.

                                                  Mikek





--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: free.spam

As discussed in the design group thread, a low dropout regulator looks good.

I'm easy.

--
amdx <[email protected]> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: amdx <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 19:08:48 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <s02032$24j$[email protected]>
References: <rv455v$6ho$[email protected]> <rv4oh1$cfb$[email protected]> <rv6617$2rs$[email protected]> <rv6ijs$qed$[email protected]> <rv8ogi$sku$[email protected]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 01:08:50 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a7beaec07e85e5e30d97199ae0ac4d1e"; logging-data="2195"; mail-complaints-to="[email protected]"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Ref1YlAJRe+Rs91ys8cv4"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:C4Uav+90TmtHgqpw1b4SgwxfBSk=
In-Reply-To: <rv8ogi$sku$[email protected]>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 210210-4, 02/10/2021), Outbound message
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55525

On 2/1/2021 5:26 AM, John Doe wrote:

Rich <[email protected]d> wrote:

John Doe wrote:

Rich wrote:

John Doe wrote:

I can put a resistor after a voltage that's too high for the circuit? >>>>>>
Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have a
variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.

If it's a big capacitor, the voltage variation is minimal?

No, the size of the capacitor simply determines the rate at which the
voltage changes.

Then your answer should be "Yes", given the same amount of time.

Why are you fighting this?

Do you think it makes you look smart?

��Now you have made yourself look ignorant, which you are, otherwise you would not have ask the question.

��Say your device needs 9V and you have a 12V source. At some point in
time you measure the current your device draws and it is

20ma, so you decide you need a series 150 ohm resistor.�� You have it all figured out. Then at some point it fails to work.

At some point the motor in this device (the one you didn't explain )
turns on and the voltage drops to 4 volts causing the circuit to fail to operate.

��Do you want to calculate the capacitance needed to keep you supply
voltage within 5% of your required 9v?

Or do you want to just admit it is a big ass cap and a regulator may be better.

On the other hand you could give us details of the circuit, so it would
not be a guessing game.

�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Mikek

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 8/02/2021 12:02 am, Stevo wrote:

On Friday, February 5, 2021 at 11:51:24 PM UTC-5, RheillyPhoull wrote:

On 6/02/2021 10:47 am, John Doe wrote:

Nothing but a troll...

Takes one to recognize one oh brainless one.

You people with the off topic messages. What are you, toddlers in nursery school? Please quit ruining the Google group for everyone.

Well Neeny Narny Noo google grooper !!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Stevo <[email protected]> wrote:

Please quit ruining the Google group for everyone.

This is not a google group.

This is a Usenet news group.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet

The google groups UI simply provides an interface to the Usenet
newsgroup you are reading.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: free.spam

On 2/10/2021 8:43 PM, John Doe wrote:

As discussed in the design group thread, a low dropout regulator looks good.

I'm easy.

I see you keep posting all the header information, what is the purpose
of that?

I don't know enough about it to glean anything from it, what are you
getting from it?

                                            Mikek


--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

In sci.electronics.basics amdx <[email protected]> wrote:

On 2/10/2021 8:43 PM, John Doe wrote:

As discussed in the design group thread, a low dropout regulator
looks good.

I'm easy.

I see you keep posting all the header information, what is the
purpose of that?

That appears to be Mr Doe's signal that he has switched into troll
mode.

If you read through the first few posts in this thread, you'll see that
Mr Doe is indeed quite capable of proper quoting. But once he appears
to get ticked off, he toggles into troll mode and starts quoting
excessive header information (and top posting as well).

He seems to have a very Dr. Jeckyl/Mr. Hyde aspect to his postings.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2/11/2021 9:21 AM, Bertrand Sindri wrote:

In sci.electronics.basics amdx <[email protected]> wrote:

On 2/10/2021 8:43 PM, John Doe wrote:

As discussed in the design group thread, a low dropout regulator
looks good.

I'm easy.

I see you keep posting all the header information, what is the
purpose of that?

That appears to be Mr Doe's signal that he has switched into troll
mode.

If you read through the first few posts in this thread, you'll see that
Mr Doe is indeed quite capable of proper quoting. But once he appears
to get ticked off, he toggles into troll mode and starts quoting
excessive header information (and top posting as well).

He seems to have a very Dr. Jeckyl/Mr. Hyde aspect to his postings.

But that takes extra effort on his part, what is his purpose in doing it?

He's trying to accomplish something with the action.

John Doe, what's up?


                                            Mikek


--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: free.spam

What part of "I'm easy" don't you understand?

--
Bertrand Sindri <[email protected]@yahoo.com> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!nzqwpW7fgmak1IV6pg8vew.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bertrand Sindri <[email protected]@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Followup-To: sci.electronics.basics
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:21:38 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <s03i22$1rhu$[email protected]>
References: <rv455v$6ho$[email protected]> <rv4oh1$cfb$[email protected]> <rv6617$2rs$[email protected]> <rv6ijs$qed$[email protected]> <rv8ogi$sku$[email protected]> <s02032$24j$[email protected]> <s025kl$ueb$[email protected]> <s03e48$f5h$[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: nzqwpW7fgmak1IV6pg8vew.user.gioia.aioe.org X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55528

In sci.electronics.basics amdx <[email protected]> wrote:

On 2/10/2021 8:43 PM, John Doe wrote:

As discussed in the design group thread, a low dropout regulator
looks good.

I'm easy.

I see you keep posting all the header information, what is the
purpose of that?

That appears to be Mr Doe's signal that he has switched into troll
mode.

If you read through the first few posts in this thread, you'll see that
Mr Doe is indeed quite capable of proper quoting. But once he appears
to get ticked off, he toggles into troll mode and starts quoting
excessive header information (and top posting as well).

He seems to have a very Dr. Jeckyl/Mr. Hyde aspect to his postings.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

It takes a two syllable voice command... "on top".

Voice-activated scripting is a whole new world for someone who enjoys systemwide macros in windows.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2/11/2021 11:47 AM, John Doe wrote:

It takes a two syllable voice command... "on top".

Voice-activated scripting is a whole new world for someone who enjoys systemwide macros in windows.

Ok, so you can do it easily, but why do you do it?

What do you think you are doing to the person who's header you put in
the body of the post.

I just want to understand what advantage you get from this act.

Is it something I should start doing when I'm disagree with a poster?

And should I top post when I do it?

Or, am I over thinking this and you can't write a macro to do a proper
post with a quote?

Mikek


--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: free.spam

Because.

This group is starving for activity...

--
amdx <[email protected]> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: amdx <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 07:20:58 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <s05vbr$1nn$[email protected]>
References: <rv455v$6ho$[email protected]> <rv4oh1$cfb$[email protected]> <rv6617$2rs$[email protected]> <rv6ijs$qed$[email protected]> <rv8ogi$sku$[email protected]> <s02032$24j$[email protected]> <s025kl$ueb$[email protected]> <s03e48$f5h$[email protected]> <s03i22$

1rhu$[email protected]> <s03mtt$l30$[email protected]> <s03qiv$gne$[email protected]>

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:20:59 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="43ff3bc1054611fd024c42d1e5dc122c"; logging-data="1783"; mail-complaints-to="[email protected]"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/nI0UPLjX+uyhlM6Vcp3CA"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WK9CNOAcu2WyILulMJNe8clUum8=
In-Reply-To: <s03qiv$gne$[email protected]>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 210212-4, 02/12/2021), Outbound message
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55532

On 2/11/2021 11:47 AM, John Doe wrote:

It takes a two syllable voice command... "on top".

Voice-activated scripting is a whole new world for someone who enjoys
systemwide macros in windows.

Ok, so you can do it easily, but why do you do it?

What do you think you are doing to the person who's header you put in
the body of the post.

I just want to understand what advantage you get from this act.

Is it something I should start doing when I'm disagree with a poster?

And should I top post when I do it?

Or, am I over thinking this and you can't write a macro to do a proper
post with a quote?

Mikek

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

amdx <[email protected]> wrote:

On 2/11/2021 11:47 AM, John Doe wrote:

It takes a two syllable voice command... "on top".

Voice-activated scripting is a whole new world for someone who
enjoys systemwide macros in windows.

Ok, so you can do it easily, but why do you do it?

The appearance on this end of "why" looks to be: "to be irritating".

What do you think you are doing to the person who's header you put in
the body of the post.

The appearance given out, when the pattern happens, is that the Mr Hyde personality half of Mr Doe does it for the purpose of irritation of the
poster to which Mr Doe has chosen to "troll".

I just want to understand what advantage you get from this act.

There seems to be no advantage. Other than to overtely be irritating.

Is it something I should start doing when I'm disagree with a poster?

And should I top post when I do it?

Or, am I over thinking this and you can't write a macro to do a
proper post with a quote?

Except that when Mr Doe is operating from his Dr Jeckyl personality
half, he is quite capable of proper quoting, quote trimming, avoiding
quoting headers, and bottom posting. Implying he can write a macro to
do a proper post.

There are at least two explanations for this:

One - Mr Doe has a proper voice activated macro that can quote properly
and bottom post -- which implies that the header quoting top posting Mr
Hyde personality is a deliberate choice on his part.

Two - Mr Doe only uses his voice activated macro when trolling. Which
is, again, a deliberate choice on his part when the Mr Hyde personality
is activated.

Both boil down to deliberate choices on Mr Doe's part.

So I submit that he deliberatly chooses the top posting, header
quoting, Mr Hyde version to be irritating to the person to which he is responding.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: free.spam

Nobody forces anybody to read anybody else's posts on USENET. The idea
USENET posts must conform to some standard is nothing but a ridiculous
troll. You can cope with it or you can ignore it.

A netcop wannabe troll starved for attention...

--
Bertrand Sindri <[email protected]@yahoo.com> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!nzqwpW7fgmak1IV6pg8vew.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bertrand Sindri <[email protected]@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:30:09 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <s066u1$1iip$[email protected]>
References: <rv455v$6ho$[email protected]> <rv4oh1$cfb$[email protected]> <rv6617$2rs$[email protected]> <rv6ijs$qed$[email protected]> <rv8ogi$sku$[email protected]> <s02032$24j$[email protected]> <s025kl$ueb$[email protected]> <s03e48$f5h$[email protected]> <s03i22$

1rhu$[email protected]> <s03mtt$l30$[email protected]> <s03qiv$gne$[email protected]> <s05vbr$1nn$[email protected]>

NNTP-Posting-Host: nzqwpW7fgmak1IV6pg8vew.user.gioia.aioe.org X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55534

amdx <[email protected]> wrote:

On 2/11/2021 11:47 AM, John Doe wrote:

It takes a two syllable voice command... "on top".

Voice-activated scripting is a whole new world for someone who
enjoys systemwide macros in windows.

Ok, so you can do it easily, but why do you do it?

The appearance on this end of "why" looks to be: "to be irritating".

What do you think you are doing to the person who's header you put in
the body of the post.

The appearance given out, when the pattern happens, is that the Mr Hyde personality half of Mr Doe does it for the purpose of irritation of the poster to which Mr Doe has chosen to "troll".

I just want to understand what advantage you get from this act.

There seems to be no advantage. Other than to overtely be irritating.

Is it something I should start doing when I'm disagree with a poster?

And should I top post when I do it?

Or, am I over thinking this and you can't write a macro to do a
proper post with a quote?

Except that when Mr Doe is operating from his Dr Jeckyl personality
half, he is quite capable of proper quoting, quote trimming, avoiding
quoting headers, and bottom posting. Implying he can write a macro to
do a proper post.

There are at least two explanations for this:

One - Mr Doe has a proper voice activated macro that can quote properly
and bottom post -- which implies that the header quoting top posting Mr
Hyde personality is a deliberate choice on his part.

Two - Mr Doe only uses his voice activated macro when trolling. Which
is, again, a deliberate choice on his part when the Mr Hyde personality
is activated.

Both boil down to deliberate choices on Mr Doe's part.

So I submit that he deliberatly chooses the top posting, header
quoting, Mr Hyde version to be irritating to the person to which he is responding.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: free.spam

On 2021-02-12, John Doe <[email protected]> wrote:

Nobody forces anybody to read anybody else's posts on USENET. The idea
USENET posts must conform to some standard is nothing but a ridiculous
troll. You can cope with it or you can ignore it.

Generally your mangled posts consist entirely of untruths.
(with the exception of the quoted part), this one seems to have some
truth however.


--
Jasen.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)