I'd like to use the mechanical aspects of a two-way splitter to
act as a "tee" for DC power distribution. This seems infinitely
easier than trying to wire a bunch of connectors together.
Most of the devices I've encountered have a "back" that is soldered
in place as a solid shield.
There's a bit of mass, there, so I am wondering how much
effort it will be to try to remove the back, gut the device,
replace with a length of wire and reattach the back piece.
I'd like to use the mechanical aspects of a two-way splitter to
act as a "tee" for DC power distribution. This seems infinitely
easier than trying to wire a bunch of connectors together.
Most of the devices I've encountered have a "back" that is soldered
in place as a solid shield.
There's a bit of mass, there, so I am wondering how much
effort it will be to try to remove the back, gut the device,
replace with a length of wire and reattach the back piece.
"Don Y" <[email protected]d> wrote in message news:103gdgj$2lhen$[email protected]...
I'd like to use the mechanical aspects of a two-way splitter to
act as a "tee" for DC power distribution. This seems infinitely
easier than trying to wire a bunch of connectors together.
Most of the devices I've encountered have a "back" that is soldered
in place as a solid shield.
There's a bit of mass, there, so I am wondering how much
effort it will be to try to remove the back, gut the device,
replace with a length of wire and reattach the back piece.
I'd have done something like that 40 years ago.
These days I'd be wary of whether there could be any circumstances where
some lawyer tells me I haven't complied with the relevant
power distribution regulations.
I'd like to use the mechanical aspects of a two-way splitter to
act as a "tee" for DC power distribution. This seems infinitely
easier than trying to wire a bunch of connectors together.
Most of the devices I've encountered have a "back" that is soldered
in place as a solid shield.
There's a bit of mass, there, so I am wondering how much
effort it will be to try to remove the back, gut the device,
replace with a length of wire and reattach the back piece.
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 01:54:25 -0700, Don Y
<[email protected]d> wrote:
I'd like to use the mechanical aspects of a two-way splitter to
act as a "tee" for DC power distribution. This seems infinitely
easier than trying to wire a bunch of connectors together.
Most of the devices I've encountered have a "back" that is soldered
in place as a solid shield.
There's a bit of mass, there, so I am wondering how much
effort it will be to try to remove the back, gut the device,
replace with a length of wire and reattach the back piece.
Phone plugs are great connectors. You can step on them or blind-mate
them in the dark.
https://www.amazon.com/Headphone-Splitter-Connector-Adapter-Earphones/dp/B00Y1YD8PK/ref=sr_1_14
In the pre-Ethernet days, time sharing with RS232, I wired a building
with all phone jacks for the terminals.
On 6/25/2025 9:02 AM, Edward Rawde wrote:
"Don Y" <[email protected]d> wrote in message news:103gdgj$2lhen$[email protected]...
I'd like to use the mechanical aspects of a two-way splitter to
act as a "tee" for DC power distribution. This seems infinitely
easier than trying to wire a bunch of connectors together.
Most of the devices I've encountered have a "back" that is soldered
in place as a solid shield.
There's a bit of mass, there, so I am wondering how much
effort it will be to try to remove the back, gut the device,
replace with a length of wire and reattach the back piece.
I'd have done something like that 40 years ago.
How did you remove (and reattach!) the back cover?
There's a shitload of
thermal mass there to overcome. And, over a large area (2+ sq in).
I'd be tempted to try a propane torch for removal -- in the hope that
there would be no collateral damage from the excess heat.
These days I'd be wary of whether there could be any circumstances where
some lawyer tells me I haven't complied with the relevant
power distribution regulations.
Powered splitters/amplifiers tend to accept power over an F-connector.
It's all low voltage (9-15VDC) and low power (a few watts).
Providing power by connecting several RG6 "stubs" together and to the power source doesn't change the amount of power or potentials involved.
It just looks more "homemade". <frown>
I'd like to use the mechanical aspects of a two-way splitter to
act as a "tee" for DC power distribution. This seems infinitely
easier than trying to wire a bunch of connectors together.
Most of the devices I've encountered have a "back" that is soldered
in place as a solid shield.
There's a bit of mass, there, so I am wondering how much
effort it will be to try to remove the back, gut the device,
replace with a length of wire and reattach the back piece.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 714 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 135:00:57 |
| Calls: | 12,087 |
| Files: | 14,997 |
| Messages: | 6,517,362 |