• Too much time on their hands!

    From Don Y@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 17 05:25:29 2025
    I stumbled on a nice little "tin" that I figured would be
    great to repurpose. Maybe store a selection of OTC medications
    in it to keep on-hand, in the car? It contained some round,
    metallic "weights", carefully organized to suggest value:
    <https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/LvEAAOSwIXlkH5k2/s-l1600.webp>
    Chasing down the Logitech branding, it appears these are
    used to alter the *weight* (feel) of a mouse:
    <https://www.ebay.com/itm/388072568821>
    Sheesh! Do these guys (PC gamers) have that much time/money
    to spare that they are concerned with how *heavy* their
    mouse feels? Prior to the development of this mouse,
    were gamers busily *taping* COINS and other masses onto
    their mice just to improve their score?? Is the mouse's
    mass that critical to its use?

    [Shouldn't there also be a huge selection of available
    COLORS, shapes, etc.???]

    <rolls eyes>

    OTOH, it gives me something else to consider in developing a
    universal UI!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin @21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon Mar 17 08:05:59 2025
    On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 05:25:29 -0700, Don Y
    <[email protected]d> wrote:

    I stumbled on a nice little "tin" that I figured would be
    great to repurpose. Maybe store a selection of OTC medications
    in it to keep on-hand, in the car? It contained some round,
    metallic "weights", carefully organized to suggest value:
    <https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/LvEAAOSwIXlkH5k2/s-l1600.webp>
    Chasing down the Logitech branding, it appears these are
    used to alter the *weight* (feel) of a mouse:
    <https://www.ebay.com/itm/388072568821>
    Sheesh! Do these guys (PC gamers) have that much time/money
    to spare that they are concerned with how *heavy* their
    mouse feels? Prior to the development of this mouse,
    were gamers busily *taping* COINS and other masses onto
    their mice just to improve their score?? Is the mouse's
    mass that critical to its use?

    [Shouldn't there also be a huge selection of available
    COLORS, shapes, etc.???]

    <rolls eyes>

    OTOH, it gives me something else to consider in developing a
    universal UI!

    My PCs were purchased my our IT consultants. They have insane gaming
    GPUs and weigh 42 pounds each, and are almost impossible to carry.
    Nothing that I do (Spice, PCB layout, twirling SolidWorks models
    around) needs that. I'm planning to dump them and get some nice little
    Dells.

    Gaming seems to be an addictive thing like TikTok or fentanyl. Natural selection should kick in on those.

    I do buy expensive (over $20!) laser mice because they work on Ikea
    varnish.

    The Pi400 does come with a cute red and white mouse.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lasse Langwadt@21:1/5 to Don Y on Mon Mar 17 23:48:57 2025
    On 3/17/25 13:25, Don Y wrote:
    I stumbled on a nice little "tin" that I figured would be
    great to repurpose.  Maybe store a selection of OTC medications
    in it to keep on-hand, in the car?  It contained some round,
    metallic "weights", carefully organized to suggest value:
       <https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/LvEAAOSwIXlkH5k2/s-l1600.webp>
    Chasing down the Logitech branding, it appears these are
    used to alter the *weight* (feel) of a mouse:
       <https://www.ebay.com/itm/388072568821>
    Sheesh!  Do these guys (PC gamers) have that much time/money
    to spare that they are concerned with how *heavy* their
    mouse feels?  Prior to the development of this mouse,
    were gamers busily *taping* COINS and other masses onto
    their mice just to improve their score??  Is the mouse's
    mass that critical to its use?

    [Shouldn't there also be a huge selection of available
    COLORS, shapes, etc.???]

    there is ...

    why is it so hard to imagine that you want to do something with speed
    and accuracy, weight and feel can make a difference?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Y@21:1/5 to Lasse Langwadt on Mon Mar 17 21:27:11 2025
    On 3/17/2025 3:48 PM, Lasse Langwadt wrote:
    On 3/17/25 13:25, Don Y wrote:
    I stumbled on a nice little "tin" that I figured would be
    great to repurpose.  Maybe store a selection of OTC medications
    in it to keep on-hand, in the car?  It contained some round,
    metallic "weights", carefully organized to suggest value:
        <https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/LvEAAOSwIXlkH5k2/s-l1600.webp>
    Chasing down the Logitech branding, it appears these are
    used to alter the *weight* (feel) of a mouse:
        <https://www.ebay.com/itm/388072568821>
    Sheesh!  Do these guys (PC gamers) have that much time/money
    to spare that they are concerned with how *heavy* their
    mouse feels?  Prior to the development of this mouse,
    were gamers busily *taping* COINS and other masses onto
    their mice just to improve their score??  Is the mouse's
    mass that critical to its use?

    [Shouldn't there also be a huge selection of available
    COLORS, shapes, etc.???]

    there is ...

    There are cosmetic differences, not structural/functional ones.

    I've probably tested 200 different mice, over the years. (I can access probably 40 on any given day) None "fit" my hand; they're all just
    rehashes of the same basic design/size. (gyromice being a notable
    difference yet still a poor fit)

    why is it so hard to imagine that you want to do something with speed and accuracy, weight and feel can make a difference?

    Then a mouse would be the wrong sort of pointing device, wouldn't it?
    E.g., signing your name requires speed and accuracy -- yet a mouse
    is far from even being an *adequate* device to achieve those goals!

    There's a reason motion controllers exist -- wouldn't it seem obvious
    that a "pointing device" suitable for gaming should exist as a different
    beast, entirely?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Brown@21:1/5 to john larkin on Tue Mar 18 09:08:32 2025
    On 17/03/2025 15:05, john larkin wrote:
    On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 05:25:29 -0700, Don Y
    <[email protected]d> wrote:

    I stumbled on a nice little "tin" that I figured would be
    great to repurpose. Maybe store a selection of OTC medications
    in it to keep on-hand, in the car? It contained some round,
    metallic "weights", carefully organized to suggest value:
    <https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/LvEAAOSwIXlkH5k2/s-l1600.webp>
    Chasing down the Logitech branding, it appears these are
    used to alter the *weight* (feel) of a mouse:
    <https://www.ebay.com/itm/388072568821>

    I still remember the good old days (early 80's) when the Swiss firm
    Logitech started out by marketing the ETH Zurich Modula2 compiler and
    bespoke word processing software. "Logiciel" being software in French.
    (French language police would not allow the nasty English word)

    Long before they started making any hardware. The mouse was an
    unexpected consumer success when Windows took the world by storm!

    Sheesh! Do these guys (PC gamers) have that much time/money
    to spare that they are concerned with how *heavy* their
    mouse feels? Prior to the development of this mouse,
    were gamers busily *taping* COINS and other masses onto
    their mice just to improve their score?? Is the mouse's
    mass that critical to its use?

    [Shouldn't there also be a huge selection of available
    COLORS, shapes, etc.???]

    <rolls eyes>

    OTOH, it gives me something else to consider in developing a
    universal UI!

    My PCs were purchased my our IT consultants. They have insane gaming
    GPUs and weigh 42 pounds each, and are almost impossible to carry.

    You need to eat more shredded wheat!

    Nothing that I do (Spice, PCB layout, twirling SolidWorks models
    around) needs that. I'm planning to dump them and get some nice little
    Dells.

    Gaming seems to be an addictive thing like TikTok or fentanyl. Natural selection should kick in on those.

    Gaming machines can be decent general purpose machines if you delete the graphics card entirely. Doing that prevents you from running most AI
    codes and various gofaster GPU based parallel processing libraries.

    I do buy expensive (over $20!) laser mice because they work on Ikea
    varnish.

    The Pi400 does come with a cute red and white mouse.

    Unless you do a lot of video editing or 3D rendering the GPU built into
    the modern Intel chips is entirely adequate for 2D business graphics.

    --
    Martin Brown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Y@21:1/5 to Martin Brown on Tue Mar 18 07:21:21 2025
    On 3/18/2025 2:08 AM, Martin Brown wrote:
    Unless you do a lot of video editing or 3D rendering

    It also helps with SfM applications; anything that can be seen as
    massively parallel. OTOH, as displays get larger and denser,
    the amount of resources spent painting pixels increases
    significantly (I think each of my GPUs has 6GB of VRAM to
    offload a lot of that from the host).

    the GPU built into the
    modern Intel chips is entirely adequate for 2D business graphics.

    I suspect most "business applications" are rapidly becoming
    obsolescent. We've seen (in terms of the sorts of kit that
    gets recycled in large quantities -- corporate donors) the
    shift from "desktops" to SFF, then USFF, now NUC. I suspect
    we are about to (re)enter yet another swing of the pendulum
    back to centralized systems with just display services at
    the edge -- at least in business applications.

    [How long that will last before the pendulum inevitably swings
    back the other way -- again -- is anyone's guess. A lot will
    depend on the resource needs of AI-based services and where
    those are supplied (cloud vs. locally vs. per seat).]

    [[We will also likely see a shift towards general purpose GPUs
    (instead of those that are just tuned to video) as AI creeps
    closer to the user's keyboard]]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin @21:1/5 to '''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk on Tue Mar 18 08:03:46 2025
    On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:08:32 +0000, Martin Brown
    <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:

    On 17/03/2025 15:05, john larkin wrote:
    On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 05:25:29 -0700, Don Y
    <[email protected]d> wrote:

    I stumbled on a nice little "tin" that I figured would be
    great to repurpose. Maybe store a selection of OTC medications
    in it to keep on-hand, in the car? It contained some round,
    metallic "weights", carefully organized to suggest value:
    <https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/LvEAAOSwIXlkH5k2/s-l1600.webp>
    Chasing down the Logitech branding, it appears these are
    used to alter the *weight* (feel) of a mouse:
    <https://www.ebay.com/itm/388072568821>

    I still remember the good old days (early 80's) when the Swiss firm
    Logitech started out by marketing the ETH Zurich Modula2 compiler and
    bespoke word processing software. "Logiciel" being software in French. >(French language police would not allow the nasty English word)

    Long before they started making any hardware. The mouse was an
    unexpected consumer success when Windows took the world by storm!

    Sheesh! Do these guys (PC gamers) have that much time/money
    to spare that they are concerned with how *heavy* their
    mouse feels? Prior to the development of this mouse,
    were gamers busily *taping* COINS and other masses onto
    their mice just to improve their score?? Is the mouse's
    mass that critical to its use?

    [Shouldn't there also be a huge selection of available
    COLORS, shapes, etc.???]

    <rolls eyes>

    OTOH, it gives me something else to consider in developing a
    universal UI!

    My PCs were purchased my our IT consultants. They have insane gaming
    GPUs and weigh 42 pounds each, and are almost impossible to carry.

    You need to eat more shredded wheat!

    I'm hardly a body builder, but the boxes have nothing to grab, and
    have doors and filters that slide around. One has to rig them with
    ropes or straps to move them around. Sitting on a carpeted floor, they
    may as well be welded down.



    Nothing that I do (Spice, PCB layout, twirling SolidWorks models
    around) needs that. I'm planning to dump them and get some nice little
    Dells.

    Gaming seems to be an addictive thing like TikTok or fentanyl. Natural
    selection should kick in on those.

    Gaming machines can be decent general purpose machines if you delete the >graphics card entirely. Doing that prevents you from running most AI
    codes and various gofaster GPU based parallel processing libraries.

    I do buy expensive (over $20!) laser mice because they work on Ikea
    varnish.

    The Pi400 does come with a cute red and white mouse.

    Unless you do a lot of video editing or 3D rendering the GPU built into
    the modern Intel chips is entirely adequate for 2D business graphics.

    I wish they would help with Spice. Yesterday we were running a pretty
    simple power supply sim at around 100 us/s. It takes many minutes to
    settle out, and it's hard to learn with such delayed feedback.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Brown@21:1/5 to john larkin on Wed Mar 19 09:42:37 2025
    On 18/03/2025 15:03, john larkin wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:08:32 +0000, Martin Brown
    <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:

    Unless you do a lot of video editing or 3D rendering the GPU built into
    the modern Intel chips is entirely adequate for 2D business graphics.

    I wish they would help with Spice. Yesterday we were running a pretty
    simple power supply sim at around 100 us/s. It takes many minutes to
    settle out, and it's hard to learn with such delayed feedback.

    Have you tried running two instances of Spice at the same time?

    On a suitably beefy machine with plenty of ram it might be possible to
    run two different sets of parameters at the same time on the performance
    cores without saturating memory or disk IO bandwidth.

    It will depend critically on how big the matrix problem gets but for
    some smaller problems it might possibly be an option.

    --
    Martin Brown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin @21:1/5 to '''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk on Wed Mar 19 07:32:29 2025
    On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 09:42:37 +0000, Martin Brown
    <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:

    On 18/03/2025 15:03, john larkin wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:08:32 +0000, Martin Brown
    <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:

    Unless you do a lot of video editing or 3D rendering the GPU built into
    the modern Intel chips is entirely adequate for 2D business graphics.

    I wish they would help with Spice. Yesterday we were running a pretty
    simple power supply sim at around 100 us/s. It takes many minutes to
    settle out, and it's hard to learn with such delayed feedback.

    Have you tried running two instances of Spice at the same time?

    On a suitably beefy machine with plenty of ram it might be possible to
    run two different sets of parameters at the same time on the performance >cores without saturating memory or disk IO bandwidth.

    It will depend critically on how big the matrix problem gets but for
    some smaller problems it might possibly be an option.

    Two instances would be confusing. One use of Spice is to train one's
    instincts and iterate a design.

    At times yesterday, the power supply sim was running at picoseconds
    per second. LT Spice allows one to set the max time step, but not the
    minimum time step.

    The Gear solver and some relaxed tolerances seem to be better for this
    case.

    In one recent case the sim kept stalling. I added a 1K resistor off to
    the side, one end grounded and the other end connected to nothing.
    That fixed things.

    Inductors, especially coupled inductors, are quirky. A little ESR
    often helps, but that may be random, like the 1K resistor.

    I wonder if just moving parts around the screen affects the sim. Gotta
    try that.

    I think LT Spice was once called Switchercad. But it's terrible with
    switchers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lasse Langwadt@21:1/5 to Don Y on Wed Mar 19 22:49:33 2025
    On 3/18/25 05:27, Don Y wrote:
    On 3/17/2025 3:48 PM, Lasse Langwadt wrote:
    On 3/17/25 13:25, Don Y wrote:
    I stumbled on a nice little "tin" that I figured would be
    great to repurpose.  Maybe store a selection of OTC medications
    in it to keep on-hand, in the car?  It contained some round,
    metallic "weights", carefully organized to suggest value:
        <https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/LvEAAOSwIXlkH5k2/s-l1600.webp>
    Chasing down the Logitech branding, it appears these are
    used to alter the *weight* (feel) of a mouse:
        <https://www.ebay.com/itm/388072568821>
    Sheesh!  Do these guys (PC gamers) have that much time/money
    to spare that they are concerned with how *heavy* their
    mouse feels?  Prior to the development of this mouse,
    were gamers busily *taping* COINS and other masses onto
    their mice just to improve their score??  Is the mouse's
    mass that critical to its use?

    [Shouldn't there also be a huge selection of available
    COLORS, shapes, etc.???]

    there is ...

    There are cosmetic differences, not structural/functional ones.

    ok, if you say so ...

    I've probably tested 200 different mice, over the years.  (I can access probably 40 on any given day) None "fit" my hand; they're all just
    rehashes of the same basic design/size.  (gyromice being a notable difference yet still a poor fit)

    obviously. as always for every answer you get you add five new reasons
    why it wasn't the answer you were looking for

    why is it so hard to imagine that you want to do something with speed
    and accuracy, weight and feel can make a difference?

    Then a mouse would be the wrong sort of pointing device, wouldn't it?

    no, it is games played with a mouse

    E.g., signing your name requires speed and accuracy -- yet a mouse
    is far from even being an *adequate* device to achieve those goals!

    playing a game is not signing you name


    There's a reason motion controllers exist -- wouldn't it seem obvious
    that a "pointing device" suitable for gaming should exist as a different beast, entirely?

    it is games played with a mouse.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Brown@21:1/5 to john larkin on Wed Mar 19 22:00:50 2025
    On 19/03/2025 14:32, john larkin wrote:
    On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 09:42:37 +0000, Martin Brown
    <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:

    On 18/03/2025 15:03, john larkin wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:08:32 +0000, Martin Brown
    <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:

    Unless you do a lot of video editing or 3D rendering the GPU built into >>>> the modern Intel chips is entirely adequate for 2D business graphics.

    I wish they would help with Spice. Yesterday we were running a pretty
    simple power supply sim at around 100 us/s. It takes many minutes to
    settle out, and it's hard to learn with such delayed feedback.

    Have you tried running two instances of Spice at the same time?

    On a suitably beefy machine with plenty of ram it might be possible to
    run two different sets of parameters at the same time on the performance
    cores without saturating memory or disk IO bandwidth.

    It will depend critically on how big the matrix problem gets but for
    some smaller problems it might possibly be an option.

    Two instances would be confusing. One use of Spice is to train one's instincts and iterate a design.

    You could try two alternative values for one parameter at the same time.

    At times yesterday, the power supply sim was running at picoseconds
    per second. LT Spice allows one to set the max time step, but not the
    minimum time step.

    That is usually an indication that there is something stiff about the differential equations being solved and that the algorithm has halved
    the time step many times in a desperate attempt to control the error
    budget. I once had a plot job from solving a very stiff set of equations cancelled by the operator "because the red pen began to work loose". The
    line segments approaching zero got very very short indeed!

    The Gear solver and some relaxed tolerances seem to be better for this
    case.

    In one recent case the sim kept stalling. I added a 1K resistor off to
    the side, one end grounded and the other end connected to nothing.
    That fixed things.

    That is odd. I can imagine adding a 1M resistor between some pair of
    nodes might take the edge off it.

    Inductors, especially coupled inductors, are quirky. A little ESR
    often helps, but that may be random, like the 1K resistor.

    Resonant tank circuits with high Q can sometimes cause trouble.


    --
    Martin Brown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gerhard Hoffmann@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 20 03:14:05 2025
    Am 19.03.25 um 23:00 schrieb Martin Brown:
    On 19/03/2025 14:32, john larkin wrote:

    In one recent case the sim kept stalling. I added a 1K resistor off to
    the side, one end grounded and the other end connected to nothing.
    That fixed things.

    That is odd. I can imagine adding a 1M resistor between some pair of
    nodes might take the edge off it.

    Inductors, especially coupled inductors, are quirky. A little ESR
    often helps, but that may be random, like the 1K resistor.

    Resonant tank circuits with high Q can sometimes cause trouble.

    Trying to solve the matrix equations ( i.e. calculating the nodal
    voltages from the G-Matrix and the current vector ) may result in
    divide-by-0 errors when a node has absolutely no conductivity to
    other nodes. Therefore, some artificial conductivity is introduced.
    Otherwise you could not solve a circuit with 2 capacitors in series
    and nothing else. The art is to choose the conductivity so that the
    equation system can be solved without div by 0, without changing the
    original circuit too much. Different spices may handle that
    differently; usually there is an option to set the minimum conductivity
    to GND if the automatic choice does not work.
    There is no such thing in spice like a node that floats in nirvana.

    AFAIR there is also a limit variable for g-matrix elements that are
    considered for pivoting during solution of the equation system.

    Last time I looked deeper into this was when I tried to compile
    Spice 2G6 or so on my new 10 MHz 286 with 70 MB disk under
    Interactive Unix. Oh, those 64k segments! Fortran memory management
    was done by indexing out of the bounds of a small array. =:-()

    That a student had a 70 MB disk all for himself was quite close
    to hubris. The institute VAX had 2 * 300 MB Fujitsu Eagle with one
    disk for us mortals.

    Gerhard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Y@21:1/5 to Lasse Langwadt on Wed Mar 19 19:18:43 2025
    On 3/19/2025 2:49 PM, Lasse Langwadt wrote:
    On 3/18/25 05:27, Don Y wrote:
    On 3/17/2025 3:48 PM, Lasse Langwadt wrote:
    On 3/17/25 13:25, Don Y wrote:
    I stumbled on a nice little "tin" that I figured would be
    great to repurpose.  Maybe store a selection of OTC medications
    in it to keep on-hand, in the car?  It contained some round,
    metallic "weights", carefully organized to suggest value:
        <https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/LvEAAOSwIXlkH5k2/s-l1600.webp>
    Chasing down the Logitech branding, it appears these are
    used to alter the *weight* (feel) of a mouse:
        <https://www.ebay.com/itm/388072568821>
    Sheesh!  Do these guys (PC gamers) have that much time/money
    to spare that they are concerned with how *heavy* their
    mouse feels?  Prior to the development of this mouse,
    were gamers busily *taping* COINS and other masses onto
    their mice just to improve their score??  Is the mouse's
    mass that critical to its use?

    [Shouldn't there also be a huge selection of available
    COLORS, shapes, etc.???]

    there is ...

    There are cosmetic differences, not structural/functional ones.

    ok, if you say so ...

    *LOOK* at the mice available. They all highly resemble each other
    in size and shape. There are only a couple of different motion sensing technologies used. The interconnect is wired (PS/2, 9 pin serial, USB,
    BT) which doesn't change the "feel" of the mouse.

    The number and location of the buttons varies from a minimum of one to
    as many as 6 or 7. A scroll wheel may or may not be present -- and
    the number of degrees of freedom can vary. The contour can be
    tailored to right-handed or left-handed users.

    But, the basic "mouse" is the same -- just with differences in
    "decorations".

    I've probably tested 200 different mice, over the years.  (I can access
    probably 40 on any given day) None "fit" my hand; they're all just
    rehashes of the same basic design/size.  (gyromice being a notable
    difference yet still a poor fit)

    obviously. as always for every answer you get you add five new reasons why it wasn't the answer you were looking for

    What have I added? The fact that a silly marketing gimmick doesn't
    address a more important issue -- how the device actually *fits*
    the user (*a* user -- me)? Do you buy mice based WITHOUT concern for
    how they fit/feel in your hand?

    If you dislike my questions, posts, why get involved?

    why is it so hard to imagine that you want to do something with speed and >>> accuracy, weight and feel can make a difference?

    Then a mouse would be the wrong sort of pointing device, wouldn't it?

    no, it is games played with a mouse

    It is a game played with a POINTING DEVICE. Why use a technology
    that doesn't do what you want, *well*?

    E.g., signing your name requires speed and accuracy -- yet a mouse
    is far from even being an *adequate* device to achieve those goals!

    playing a game is not signing you name

    Signing your name is a task that requires "speed and accuracy".
    You decided this was the important criteria; I've provided an
    example of just such an application where a mouse fails miserably.

    Or, is there some other notion of "speed and accuracy" that applies
    to games but not other activities?

    There's a reason motion controllers exist -- wouldn't it seem obvious
    that a "pointing device" suitable for gaming should exist as a different
    beast, entirely?

    it is games played with a mouse.

    It is a game played with a POINTING DEVICE. Why use a technology
    that doesn't do what you want, *well*?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin @21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 19 19:32:56 2025
    On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 03:14:05 +0100, Gerhard Hoffmann <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    Am 19.03.25 um 23:00 schrieb Martin Brown:
    On 19/03/2025 14:32, john larkin wrote:

    In one recent case the sim kept stalling. I added a 1K resistor off to
    the side, one end grounded and the other end connected to nothing.
    That fixed things.

    That is odd. I can imagine adding a 1M resistor between some pair of
    nodes might take the edge off it.

    Adding the dummy resistor, or maybe moving parts on the screen,
    probably changes the martix hence the order that things are done in.
    It is a strongly chaotic system, at least for non-trivial circuits.

    Sometimes changing a resistor from 50 to 51r will fix a stall too.

    The LT Spice initial conditions solution can take ages too. Best to
    skip it.


    Inductors, especially coupled inductors, are quirky. A little ESR
    often helps, but that may be random, like the 1K resistor.

    Resonant tank circuits with high Q can sometimes cause trouble.

    Trying to solve the matrix equations ( i.e. calculating the nodal
    voltages from the G-Matrix and the current vector ) may result in
    divide-by-0 errors when a node has absolutely no conductivity to
    other nodes. Therefore, some artificial conductivity is introduced.
    Otherwise you could not solve a circuit with 2 capacitors in series
    and nothing else. The art is to choose the conductivity so that the
    equation system can be solved without div by 0, without changing the
    original circuit too much. Different spices may handle that
    differently; usually there is an option to set the minimum conductivity
    to GND if the automatic choice does not work.
    There is no such thing in spice like a node that floats in nirvana.

    AFAIR there is also a limit variable for g-matrix elements that are >considered for pivoting during solution of the equation system.

    Last time I looked deeper into this was when I tried to compile
    Spice 2G6 or so on my new 10 MHz 286 with 70 MB disk under
    Interactive Unix. Oh, those 64k segments! Fortran memory management
    was done by indexing out of the bounds of a small array. =:-()

    That a student had a 70 MB disk all for himself was quite close
    to hubris. The institute VAX had 2 * 300 MB Fujitsu Eagle with one
    disk for us mortals.

    I had a DEC RSTS timeshare system with a 64 K word fixed-head hard
    drive as the swapping disk. Fortunately it failed pretty soon.


    Gerhard





    The old ECA circuit simulator was cool. You specified the time step,
    and once in a while it might say "divide by zero error" and just keep
    going.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lasse Langwadt@21:1/5 to Don Y on Thu Mar 20 20:53:22 2025
    On 3/20/25 03:18, Don Y wrote:
    On 3/19/2025 2:49 PM, Lasse Langwadt wrote:

    it is games played with a mouse.

    It is a game played with a POINTING DEVICE.  Why use a technology
    that doesn't do what you want, *well*?


    why play baseball with a bat?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Y@21:1/5 to Lasse Langwadt on Thu Mar 20 15:13:18 2025
    On 3/20/2025 12:53 PM, Lasse Langwadt wrote:
    On 3/20/25 03:18, Don Y wrote:
    On 3/19/2025 2:49 PM, Lasse Langwadt wrote:

    it is games played with a mouse.

    It is a game played with a POINTING DEVICE.  Why use a technology
    that doesn't do what you want, *well*?


    why play baseball with a bat?

    Baseball *is* played with a bat -- because there are RULES
    governing its play.

    There are no "PC Game police" that verify you are
    using a mouse instead of any other pointing device,
    motion controller, etc.

    The fact that folks think they need to adjust the *weight*
    of their mouse in 1.7g increments is ludicrous (they
    can't alter the center of *mass* so what about folks who
    want the mouse "tail heavy").

    [A modern penny is 2.5g... why not TAPE those to the mouse
    wherever they want -- instead of being constrained to
    load the weight in the special "weight tray" which resides
    in a fixed location and orientation in the mouse]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin @21:1/5 to [email protected] on Fri Mar 21 08:52:23 2025
    On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 15:13:18 -0700, Don Y
    <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 3/20/2025 12:53 PM, Lasse Langwadt wrote:
    On 3/20/25 03:18, Don Y wrote:
    On 3/19/2025 2:49 PM, Lasse Langwadt wrote:

    it is games played with a mouse.

    It is a game played with a POINTING DEVICE.� Why use a technology
    that doesn't do what you want, *well*?


    why play baseball with a bat?

    Baseball *is* played with a bat -- because there are RULES
    governing its play.

    There are no "PC Game police" that verify you are
    using a mouse instead of any other pointing device,
    motion controller, etc.

    The fact that folks think they need to adjust the *weight*
    of their mouse in 1.7g increments is ludicrous (they
    can't alter the center of *mass* so what about folks who
    want the mouse "tail heavy").

    [A modern penny is 2.5g... why not TAPE those to the mouse
    wherever they want -- instead of being constrained to
    load the weight in the special "weight tray" which resides
    in a fixed location and orientation in the mouse]


    The computer mouse is like a real mouse. It has been optimized by
    mutation and natural selection.

    I was talking to some neighbors that we met hiking on a stairway (we
    have lots of stairways around here) about how bad it is for ones body
    to sit in front of a computer most of the day. We decided that we need
    a Peloton Mouse, really heavy with buttons that are very hard to push.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 21 19:25:59 2025
    john larkin <jlArbor.com> wrote:

    [...]
    The computer mouse is like a real mouse. It has been optimized by
    mutation and natural selection.

    The pressures of natural selection in this context might be maximum
    profit because it looks nice, not user convenience.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Fri Mar 21 13:53:06 2025
    On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 19:25:59 +0000, [email protected]d
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    john larkin <jlArbor.com> wrote:

    [...]
    The computer mouse is like a real mouse. It has been optimized by
    mutation and natural selection.

    The pressures of natural selection in this context might be maximum
    profit because it looks nice, not user convenience.

    Users don't select products based on the suppliers profits.

    I buy a fabulously expensive ($19) Dell laser mouse.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to john larkin on Fri Mar 21 21:28:48 2025
    john larkin <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 19:25:59 +0000, [email protected]d
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    john larkin <jlArbor.com> wrote:

    [...]
    The computer mouse is like a real mouse. It has been optimized by
    mutation and natural selection.

    The pressures of natural selection in this context might be maximum
    profit because it looks nice, not user convenience.

    Users don't select products based on the suppliers profits.

    Suppliers profits depend on users selecting their products. Most people
    select on what looks nice - by the time they discover it gives them
    repetitive strain injury it is too late to change it and the supplier
    has pocket the profit. ...So they chuck it away and buy a different
    model of the same make because it looks nice ...and so on.


    I buy a fabulously expensive ($19) Dell laser mouse.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Y@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Fri Mar 21 16:42:11 2025
    On 3/21/2025 2:28 PM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Suppliers profits depend on users selecting their products.

    That is a necessary condition, but not sufficient, by itself.
    The supplier has to have sufficient margin baked into the price
    to support "profits".

    Most people
    select on what looks nice - by the time they discover it gives them repetitive strain injury it is too late to change it and the supplier
    has pocket the profit.

    That depends on the market. E.g., business users typically have no say in
    the products that they are *given* to use. And, chances are, the monkey
    who *selected* the product wasn't really qualified to make the selection
    (in any way other than price, etc.)

    Some markets, word of mouth and perceived prestige drive the user's
    choice. I have numerous friends who *own* 6+ figure vehicles; but,
    few actually *drive* them. Instead, they have a "regular car" for
    that role. I.e., the choice for the costly car was made based on
    how they wanted to be perceived (by others who similarly wast^H^H^Hspend).

    ...So they chuck it away and buy a different
    model of the same make because it looks nice ...and so on.

    I find almost all mice too narrow for my hands. So, they are ALL "bad".
    In that case, I want to pick something that I can tolerate and that
    I can acquire in large numbers (so every machine can have the same mouse, keyboard, display, etc.)

    For specialty applications, I avoid the mouse entirely. E.g., I
    use a MIDI keyboard to enter musical scores; a digitizing tablet
    for CAD; motion controller for 3D work; etc. In each of these
    cases, one *could* use a mouse -- if you weren't concerned with
    productivity and intuitive use.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)