• Trump doesn't seem to have mastered the art of the deal

    From Bill Sloman@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 1 21:17:50 2025
    The news tonight had Trump getting upset when Zelensky didn't go for the
    deal the Trump was offering him. A real deal-maker might have kept him
    the White House until they'd found deal that they both could go for, but
    that didn't happen.

    If Trump had got the guy - Tony Schwartz - who ghost-wrote "Art of the
    Deal" for him - to conduct the negotiations, it might have gone better,
    but Tony Schwartz might also have found a better deal.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Art_of_the_Deal

    Trump's "deal-making" over the years has lead to a lot of bankruptcies.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bitrex@21:1/5 to Bill Sloman on Sat Mar 1 13:27:53 2025
    On 3/1/2025 5:17 AM, Bill Sloman wrote:
    The news tonight had Trump getting upset when Zelensky didn't go for the
    deal the Trump was offering him. A real deal-maker might have kept him
    the White House until they'd found deal that they both could go for, but
    that didn't happen.

    If Trump had got the guy - Tony Schwartz - who ghost-wrote "Art of the
    Deal" for him - to conduct the negotiations, it might have gone better,
    but Tony Schwartz might also have found a better deal.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Art_of_the_Deal

    Trump's "deal-making" over the years has lead to a lot of bankruptcies.



    US involvement in the Ukraine war will likely end the same way US
    involvement in Vietnam (and rather like Afghanistan, too) ended: "deals"
    will be made, North Vietnamese delegation smiles and nods and agrees to whatever, "peace with honor" is achieved, North Vietnam promptly ignores everything and overruns the country in full confidence the US won't do a
    thing once they've pulled out.

    Don't get involved in land wars in Asia is probably the overall lesson
    here, though in general when there's already a sunk cost it's probably
    best to at least try to negotiate a divorce from a position of strength,
    not pat the guy screwing your wife on the back and say "Atta boy!" which
    is an interesting tactic to say the least. but regularly deploying
    "interesting tactics" _is_ what Trump promised his voters.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bitrex@21:1/5 to Bill Sloman on Sat Mar 1 13:31:36 2025
    On 3/1/2025 5:17 AM, Bill Sloman wrote:
    The news tonight had Trump getting upset when Zelensky didn't go for the
    deal the Trump was offering him. A real deal-maker might have kept him
    the White House until they'd found deal that they both could go for, but
    that didn't happen.

    If Trump had got the guy - Tony Schwartz - who ghost-wrote "Art of the
    Deal" for him - to conduct the negotiations, it might have gone better,
    but Tony Schwartz might also have found a better deal.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Art_of_the_Deal

    Trump's "deal-making" over the years has lead to a lot of bankruptcies.



    US involvement in the Ukraine war will likely end the same way US
    involvement in Vietnam (and rather like Afghanistan, too) ended: "deals"
    will be made, North Vietnamese delegation smiles and nods and agrees to whatever, "peace with honor" is achieved, North Vietnam promptly ignores everything and overruns the country in full confidence the US won't do a
    thing once they've pulled out.

    Don't get involved in land wars in Asia is probably the overall lesson
    here, though in general when there's already a sunk cost it's probably
    best to at least try to negotiate a "divorce" from a position of strength.

    Being somewhat annoyed at one's former partner is common in even the
    most generally amicable "divorce" but patting the guy screwing your wife
    on the back and saying "Atta boy!" is an interesting tactic to say the
    least. but regularly deploying "interesting tactics" _is_ what Trump
    promised his voters.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Sloman@21:1/5 to bitrex on Sun Mar 2 23:17:09 2025
    On 2/03/2025 5:27 am, bitrex wrote:
    On 3/1/2025 5:17 AM, Bill Sloman wrote:
    The news tonight had Trump getting upset when Zelensky didn't go for
    the deal the Trump was offering him. A real deal-maker might have kept
    him the White House until they'd found deal that they both could go
    for, but that didn't happen.

    If Trump had got the guy - Tony Schwartz - who ghost-wrote "Art of the
    Deal" for him - to conduct the negotiations, it might have gone
    better, but Tony Schwartz might also have found a better deal.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Art_of_the_Deal

    Trump's "deal-making" over the years has lead to a lot of bankruptcies

    US involvement in the Ukraine war will likely end the same way US
    involvement in Vietnam (and rather like Afghanistan, too) ended: "deals"
    will be made, North Vietnamese delegation smiles and nods and agrees to whatever, "peace with honor" is achieved, North Vietnam promptly ignores everything and overruns the country in full confidence the US won't do a thing once they've pulled out.

    The US wasn't "involved" in the Ukraine - it was just providing weapons
    and ammunition.

    Trump seems to have decided that he can stop doing that, even though
    Congress authorised the expenditure. Since the US was never at war, it
    can't make peace.

    Don't get involved in land wars in Asia is probably the overall lesson
    here, though in general when there's already a sunk cost it's probably
    best to at least try to negotiate a divorce from a position of strength,
    not pat the guy screwing your wife on the back and say "Atta boy!" which
    is an interesting tactic to say the least. but regularly deploying "interesting tactics" _is_ what Trump promised his voters.

    The US wasn't "involved" in this war and Ukraine isn't in Asia.

    Putin is definitely trying to screw the Ukraine - and he started back in
    2014 when Russian annexed the Crimean peninsula, and fomented a fake insurrection in the Donbas. Neither Obama nor Trump did anything much
    about it back then.

    Congress did vote them some military supplies, and Trump got himself
    impeached by trying to hold them up to pressure Zelensky into setting up
    a fake investigation into Hunter Biden's imagined crimes.

    Quite what Trump hopes to get out of his current antics isn't clear -
    Putin may have made him an appealing offer. "Interesting tactics" may be
    as explicit as you can afford to be within the US.

    The actual Russian invasion started on the 22nd February 2022 and Biden
    got Congress to vote the Ukraine a lot of weapons and ammunition to help
    them fight them off. Trump doesn't seem to see the point.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bitrex@21:1/5 to Bill Sloman on Sun Mar 2 11:32:55 2025
    On 3/2/2025 7:17 AM, Bill Sloman wrote:
    On 2/03/2025 5:27 am, bitrex wrote:
    On 3/1/2025 5:17 AM, Bill Sloman wrote:
    The news tonight had Trump getting upset when Zelensky didn't go for
    the deal the Trump was offering him. A real deal-maker might have
    kept him the White House until they'd found deal that they both could
    go for, but that didn't happen.

    If Trump had got the guy - Tony Schwartz - who ghost-wrote "Art of
    the Deal" for him - to conduct the negotiations, it might have gone
    better, but Tony Schwartz might also have found a better deal.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Art_of_the_Deal

    Trump's "deal-making" over the years has lead to a lot of bankruptcies

    US involvement in the Ukraine war will likely end the same way US
    involvement in Vietnam (and rather like Afghanistan, too) ended:
    "deals" will be made, North Vietnamese delegation smiles and nods and
    agrees to whatever, "peace with honor" is achieved, North Vietnam
    promptly ignores everything and overruns the country in full
    confidence the US won't do a thing once they've pulled out.

    The US wasn't "involved" in the Ukraine - it was just providing weapons
    and ammunition.

    I tend to believe we own the wars we pay for well enough.

    Quite what Trump hopes to get out of his current antics isn't clear -
    Putin may have made him an appealing offer. "Interesting tactics" may be
    as explicit as you can afford to be within the US.

    The actual Russian invasion started on the 22nd February 2022 and Biden
    got Congress to vote the Ukraine a lot of weapons and ammunition to help
    them fight them off. Trump doesn't seem to see the point.


    Keep in mind a lot of what passes for wingnut politics in the US in the
    age of Trump isn't even conceived of by Trump or anyone else in the administration.

    The right-wing propaganda machine sits and monitors what ninnies are
    saying on Twitter and sees what gets traction and views. They amplify it
    and the Trump administration amplifies it further. And by this process
    various ninny ideas become Trump policy/Trumper religious dogma, in
    large part just pulled from the ether.

    It's a pragmatic kind of cult and it just runs with ideas that "work",
    not that they hang together in any kind of logical fashion.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sun Mar 2 10:46:24 2025
    On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 18:25:47 +0000, [email protected]d
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    bitrex <[email protected]> wrote:

    [...]
    Keep in mind a lot of what passes for wingnut politics in the US in the
    age of Trump isn't even conceived of by Trump or anyone else in the
    administration.

    The right-wing propaganda machine sits and monitors what ninnies are
    saying on Twitter and sees what gets traction and views. They amplify it
    and the Trump administration amplifies it further. And by this process
    various ninny ideas become Trump policy/Trumper religious dogma, in
    large part just pulled from the ether.

    It's a pragmatic kind of cult and it just runs with ideas that "work",
    not that they hang together in any kind of logical fashion.

    The person who understands how to use the latest media becomes the
    ruler. Hitler did it with broadcasting and huge P.A. systmes at massed >rallies, Trump and the other Putin's Puppets do it with Social Media.

    A few broadcast stations and huge PA systems and giant-circulation
    newspapers had a mostly captive audience. What's new is the internet,
    which allows thousands of opinion sources, and lets new ones grow
    virally almost overnight.

    This distributed information system both democratizes society and
    tribalizes it.

    Some people are successful at using social media, but nobody owns it.
    What sells is what works.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to bitrex on Sun Mar 2 18:25:47 2025
    bitrex <[email protected]> wrote:

    [...]
    Keep in mind a lot of what passes for wingnut politics in the US in the
    age of Trump isn't even conceived of by Trump or anyone else in the administration.

    The right-wing propaganda machine sits and monitors what ninnies are
    saying on Twitter and sees what gets traction and views. They amplify it
    and the Trump administration amplifies it further. And by this process various ninny ideas become Trump policy/Trumper religious dogma, in
    large part just pulled from the ether.

    It's a pragmatic kind of cult and it just runs with ideas that "work",
    not that they hang together in any kind of logical fashion.

    The person who understands how to use the latest media becomes the
    ruler. Hitler did it with broadcasting and huge P.A. systmes at massed rallies, Trump and the other Putin's Puppets do it with Social Media.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bitrex@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sun Mar 2 14:24:19 2025
    On 3/2/2025 1:25 PM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    bitrex <[email protected]> wrote:

    [...]
    Keep in mind a lot of what passes for wingnut politics in the US in the
    age of Trump isn't even conceived of by Trump or anyone else in the
    administration.

    The right-wing propaganda machine sits and monitors what ninnies are
    saying on Twitter and sees what gets traction and views. They amplify it
    and the Trump administration amplifies it further. And by this process
    various ninny ideas become Trump policy/Trumper religious dogma, in
    large part just pulled from the ether.

    It's a pragmatic kind of cult and it just runs with ideas that "work",
    not that they hang together in any kind of logical fashion.

    The person who understands how to use the latest media becomes the
    ruler. Hitler did it with broadcasting and huge P.A. systmes at massed rallies, Trump and the other Putin's Puppets do it with Social Media.

    Credit where credit is due, Trump mostly just read the room on Ukraine.
    The Ukranians plastered the Russians for years but if Putin the crazy
    bastard wants to send a million men into the grinder over it and is
    willing to send a million more (and he sure seems to be) the options of
    the US to entirely prevent it are somewhat limited.

    The wars in Gaza and Ukraine split the left in the US but Biden
    administration seemed too self-absorbed to notice that broad swathes of
    the US population were _not_ overwhelmingly sold on these wars. It
    wasn't like Bush and Afghanistan and Iraq, and just because it was
    financial and material aid didn't much change the sentiment, as
    Americans we tend to figure we own the things we pay for.

    Much bigger effort needed to be made to wrap US involvement in those
    conflicts up if Dems had wanted a better shot. But they were damned if
    they were gonna.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to john larkin on Sun Mar 2 20:15:34 2025
    john larkin <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 18:25:47 +0000, [email protected]d
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    bitrex <[email protected]> wrote:

    [...]
    Keep in mind a lot of what passes for wingnut politics in the US in the
    age of Trump isn't even conceived of by Trump or anyone else in the
    administration.

    The right-wing propaganda machine sits and monitors what ninnies are
    saying on Twitter and sees what gets traction and views. They amplify it >> and the Trump administration amplifies it further. And by this process
    various ninny ideas become Trump policy/Trumper religious dogma, in
    large part just pulled from the ether.

    It's a pragmatic kind of cult and it just runs with ideas that "work",
    not that they hang together in any kind of logical fashion.

    The person who understands how to use the latest media becomes the
    ruler. Hitler did it with broadcasting and huge P.A. systmes at massed >rallies, Trump and the other Putin's Puppets do it with Social Media.

    A few broadcast stations and huge PA systems and giant-circulation
    newspapers had a mostly captive audience. What's new is the internet,
    which allows thousands of opinion sources, and lets new ones grow
    virally almost overnight.

    That's how we believed it worked until recently.

    [..]
    Some people are successful at using social media, but nobody owns it.
    What sells is what works.f

    Large parts of it are now owned by individuals and the parts that aren't
    are swamped with fake news and other lies. China and Russia control it (directly or by proxy) and they are perverting the democratic process in America and, to a lesser extent, in Europe.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Y@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sun Mar 2 14:26:19 2025
    On 3/2/2025 1:15 PM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Large parts of it are now owned by individuals and the parts that aren't
    are swamped with fake news and other lies. China and Russia control it (directly or by proxy) and they are perverting the democratic process in America and, to a lesser extent, in Europe.

    That's like blaming the (drug) "dealer" for the addict's behavior.

    Too many people are lazy thinkers. They would much rather be TOLD
    what to think than to "exercise" (ick!) their own independent thought processes.

    It baffles me that "influencers" exist, at all. What qualifications
    do these folks have -- other than appearing to have some number of
    associated lemmings?

    Of course, this isn't new. It's just like parading some "name"
    in front of the camera to pitch *cigarettes*, liquor, etc. There
    will always be folks who are easily manipulated -- most often
    without ever knowing (and NEVER willing to admit to it as that
    would be a sign of a "weak" mind?)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Don Y on Sun Mar 2 21:41:56 2025
    Don Y <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 3/2/2025 1:15 PM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Large parts of it are now owned by individuals and the parts that aren't are swamped with fake news and other lies. China and Russia control it (directly or by proxy) and they are perverting the democratic process in America and, to a lesser extent, in Europe.

    That's like blaming the (drug) "dealer" for the addict's behavior.

    Too many people are lazy thinkers. They would much rather be TOLD
    what to think than to "exercise" (ick!) their own independent thought processes.

    It baffles me that "influencers" exist, at all. What qualifications
    do these folks have -- other than appearing to have some number of
    associated lemmings?


    The whole thing stinks - but it follows the same pattern that brought
    Hitler and the Nazis to power - control the media and you control the
    people who can't be bothered (or aren't able) to think for themselves.
    If they are in the majority, which they are in most populations, the
    democratic process automatically gives them the power to decide the fate
    of the entire population. Then the familiar pattern begins - leading
    to purges, witch-hunts, suppression of opposition and eventually
    dictatorship.

    The purges and witch-hunts have started, how long before the election
    process is abolished in America?


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Y@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sun Mar 2 16:19:09 2025
    On 3/2/2025 2:41 PM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    The whole thing stinks - but it follows the same pattern that brought
    Hitler and the Nazis to power - control the media and you control the
    people who can't be bothered (or aren't able) to think for themselves.
    If they are in the majority, which they are in most populations, the democratic process automatically gives them the power to decide the fate
    of the entire population. Then the familiar pattern begins - leading
    to purges, witch-hunts, suppression of opposition and eventually dictatorship.

    Then, the people "with means" depart for other places. Isn't this
    what happens to the "educated" russians fleeing "mother russia"?

    "Oligarchs" are likely keenly aware that they exist at the consent
    of those above them. Nothing to prevent them from "being disappeared"
    if they have backed a lawless society.

    Dictators also have dubious fates. Gaddafi and Ceaușescu were once
    "riding high" -- until they weren't.

    Gotta wonder what hitler was thinking in '44-45... I'm sure it wasn't
    what he had thought, years earlier! (Ooops!)

    The purges and witch-hunts have started, how long before the election process is abolished in America?

    It's sad as Trump *could* have used his initial term to make positive
    changes. But, he has the attitude of a two-year-old -- tearing down is something that a child learns wrt his environment *before* "building up"
    (play with a young kid and notice their behaviors as they mature).

    Rather than trying to "one-up" his predecessors --- esp Obama, who belittled him -- no doubt building on his internal inferiority complex (imagine *starting* with a million dollars and having nothing but failures throughout your career), his approach was to tear down all of their accomplishments. *Still* not realizing that the same could be done of his! (sigh)

    Of course, this is much easier than trying to excel -- which would
    have required skill and intelligence in being able to understand the
    systems he would have tried to *improve*.

    OTOH, it is interesting to note how few ("successful") people try
    to do *meaningful*/productive things. Instead, they focus on trying
    to make money... (Gotta wonder if Jobs had regrets for not applying
    himself to addressing cancer cures instead of making doodads!)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Sloman@21:1/5 to john larkin on Mon Mar 3 15:05:18 2025
    On 3/03/2025 5:46 am, john larkin wrote:
    On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 18:25:47 +0000, [email protected]d
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    bitrex <[email protected]> wrote:

    [...]
    Keep in mind a lot of what passes for wingnut politics in the US in the
    age of Trump isn't even conceived of by Trump or anyone else in the
    administration.

    The right-wing propaganda machine sits and monitors what ninnies are
    saying on Twitter and sees what gets traction and views. They amplify it >>> and the Trump administration amplifies it further. And by this process
    various ninny ideas become Trump policy/Trumper religious dogma, in
    large part just pulled from the ether.

    It's a pragmatic kind of cult and it just runs with ideas that "work",
    not that they hang together in any kind of logical fashion.

    The person who understands how to use the latest media becomes the
    ruler. Hitler did it with broadcasting and huge P.A. systmes at massed
    rallies, Trump and the other Putin's Puppets do it with Social Media.

    A few broadcast stations and huge PA systems and giant-circulation
    newspapers had a mostly captive audience. What's new is the internet,
    which allows thousands of opinion sources, and lets new ones grow
    virally almost overnight.

    This distributed information system both democratizes society and
    tribalizes it.

    Some people are successful at using social media, but nobody owns it.
    What sells is what works.

    But "what works" is what gets the attention of different individuals.
    Gullible idiots are susceptible to misinformation, and some
    misinformation works particularly well with particularly gullible
    idiots. Trump seems to spout a lot of that.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Sloman@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Mon Mar 3 15:13:03 2025
    On 3/03/2025 8:41 am, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Don Y <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 3/2/2025 1:15 PM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Large parts of it are now owned by individuals and the parts that aren't >>> are swamped with fake news and other lies. China and Russia control it
    (directly or by proxy) and they are perverting the democratic process in >>> America and, to a lesser extent, in Europe.

    That's like blaming the (drug) "dealer" for the addict's behavior.

    Too many people are lazy thinkers. They would much rather be TOLD
    what to think than to "exercise" (ick!) their own independent thought
    processes.

    It baffles me that "influencers" exist, at all. What qualifications
    do these folks have -- other than appearing to have some number of
    associated lemmings?


    The whole thing stinks - but it follows the same pattern that brought
    Hitler and the Nazis to power - control the media and you control the
    people who can't be bothered (or aren't able) to think for themselves.
    If they are in the majority, which they are in most populations, the democratic process automatically gives them the power to decide the fate
    of the entire population. Then the familiar pattern begins - leading
    to purges, witch-hunts, suppression of opposition and eventually dictatorship.

    The purges and witch-hunts have started, how long before the election process is abolished in America?

    The US Supreme court has decided that rich people are intended to spend
    what they like on influencing elections, which does corrupt the election process.

    Putin spent quite a bit on financing social media posts which supported
    Trump in 2016, and that may have been what got him his very narrow
    victory in the 2016 presidential election.

    Trump isn't going to abolish an election system that can be manipulated
    to give him an advantage, and he isn't going to reform it in a way that
    loses any advantage he may currently have.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Don Y on Mon Mar 3 09:02:45 2025
    Don Y <[email protected]d> wrote:

    [...]
    It's sad as Trump *could* have used his initial term to make positive changes. But, he has the attitude of a two-year-old -- tearing down is something that a child learns wrt his environment *before* "building up" (play with a young kid and notice their behaviors as they mature).

    Spot on!

    If you want to know what Trump will do next, think how a spoilt
    two-year-old would react in his situation.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Bill Sloman on Mon Mar 3 09:02:45 2025
    Bill Sloman <[email protected]> wrote:

    [...]ictory in the 2016 presidential election.

    Trump isn't going to abolish an election system that can be manipulated
    to give him an advantage, and he isn't going to reform it in a way that
    loses any advantage he may currently have.

    He won't stop elections if it looks as though he will win, but stopping
    any further elections that he might lose will be a lot easier than
    contesting the results after he has lost one. Once he has stopped
    elections or massively rigged them, he won't have to worry about keeping
    public support in future (he *will* have to worry about keeping the
    support of his cronies, but he has to do that anyway).


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to Bill Sloman on Mon Mar 3 09:46:46 2025
    On 03/03/2025 04:13, Bill Sloman wrote:

    Trump isn't going to abolish an election system that can be manipulated
    to give him an advantage, and he isn't going to reform it in a way that
    loses any advantage he may currently have.

    Well, the first thing required would be to remove the 22nd Amendment.
    Even with majorities in the Congress and HoR, that seems unlikely. Add
    to that the requirement for 3/4 of the individual states to agree to the change, and it seems more unlikely.

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Sloman@21:1/5 to Jeff Layman on Tue Mar 4 00:22:01 2025
    On 3/03/2025 8:46 pm, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 03/03/2025 04:13, Bill Sloman wrote:

    Trump isn't going to abolish an election system that can be manipulated
    to give him an advantage, and he isn't going to reform it in a way that
    loses any advantage he may currently have.

    Well, the first thing required would be to remove the 22nd Amendment.
    Even with majorities in the Congress and HoR, that seems unlikely. Add
    to that the requirement for 3/4 of the individual states to agree to the change, and it seems more unlikely.

    He could always argue that his first election to the presidency in 2016
    was invalid due to the Russian intervention that may have got him over
    the line.

    It would make more sense than his claim that his 2020 election victory
    was stolen from him by voter fraud. The Russian intervention in 2016 was
    real and the voter fraud in 2020 was entirely imaginary.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Y@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Mon Mar 3 15:49:35 2025
    On 3/3/2025 2:02 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Don Y <[email protected]d> wrote:

    [...]
    It's sad as Trump *could* have used his initial term to make positive
    changes. But, he has the attitude of a two-year-old -- tearing down is
    something that a child learns wrt his environment *before* "building up"
    (play with a young kid and notice their behaviors as they mature).

    Spot on!

    If you want to know what Trump will do next, think how a spoilt
    two-year-old would react in his situation.

    Wouldn't *everyone* like to behave thusly? You can't blame him.
    It's hard to accept responsibility, acknowledge your errors/faults,
    etc. *So* much easier to live in a bubble of denial and selfishness.

    Until, of course, things catch up with you (even if it is as late
    as "your death bed" -- gotta wonder what a rude awakening THAT would
    be!! To have ignored the rules your whole life and then find
    yourself confronting a truth that you can't avoid! :< )

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to john larkin on Sat Mar 8 23:03:06 2025
    On Sun, 02 Mar 2025 10:46:24 -0800, john larkin <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 18:25:47 +0000, [email protected]d
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    bitrex <[email protected]> wrote:

    [...]
    Keep in mind a lot of what passes for wingnut politics in the US in the
    age of Trump isn't even conceived of by Trump or anyone else in the
    administration.

    The right-wing propaganda machine sits and monitors what ninnies are
    saying on Twitter and sees what gets traction and views. They amplify it >>> and the Trump administration amplifies it further. And by this process
    various ninny ideas become Trump policy/Trumper religious dogma, in
    large part just pulled from the ether.

    It's a pragmatic kind of cult and it just runs with ideas that "work",
    not that they hang together in any kind of logical fashion.

    The person who understands how to use the latest media becomes the
    ruler. Hitler did it with broadcasting and huge P.A. systmes at massed >>rallies, Trump and the other Putin's Puppets do it with Social Media.

    A few broadcast stations and huge PA systems and giant-circulation
    newspapers had a mostly captive audience. What's new is the internet,
    which allows thousands of opinion sources, and lets new ones grow
    virally almost overnight.

    This distributed information system both democratizes society and
    tribalizes it.

    Some people are successful at using social media, but nobody owns it.
    What sells is what works.

    Indeed. It's a kind of meritocracy and no one from the BBC or CNN or
    NBC would survive in that environment for long due to a complete
    absence of talent.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Sloman@21:1/5 to Cursitor Doom on Mon Mar 10 14:03:08 2025
    On 9/03/2025 10:03 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Sun, 02 Mar 2025 10:46:24 -0800, john larkin <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 18:25:47 +0000, [email protected]d
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    bitrex <[email protected]> wrote:

    [...]
    Keep in mind a lot of what passes for wingnut politics in the US in the >>>> age of Trump isn't even conceived of by Trump or anyone else in the
    administration.

    The right-wing propaganda machine sits and monitors what ninnies are
    saying on Twitter and sees what gets traction and views. They amplify it >>>> and the Trump administration amplifies it further. And by this process >>>> various ninny ideas become Trump policy/Trumper religious dogma, in
    large part just pulled from the ether.

    It's a pragmatic kind of cult and it just runs with ideas that "work", >>>> not that they hang together in any kind of logical fashion.

    The person who understands how to use the latest media becomes the
    ruler. Hitler did it with broadcasting and huge P.A. systmes at massed
    rallies, Trump and the other Putin's Puppets do it with Social Media.

    A few broadcast stations and huge PA systems and giant-circulation
    newspapers had a mostly captive audience. What's new is the internet,
    which allows thousands of opinion sources, and lets new ones grow
    virally almost overnight.

    This distributed information system both democratizes society and
    tribalizes it.

    Some people are successful at using social media, but nobody owns it.
    What sells is what works.

    Indeed. It's a kind of meritocracy and no one from the BBC or CNN or
    NBC would survive in that environment for long due to a complete
    absence of talent.

    What Cursiotr doom sees as "talent" is the capacity to entertain the
    kind of blatantly fatuous ideas that appeal to him.

    It's a specialised market and not one that the BBC or CNN were designed
    to serve.

    Kinky sex is another such specialised market, but it's adherents do have
    enough sense not to complain when the BBC and CNN don't cater to their
    peculiar tastes.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)