XPost: alt.philosophy, alt.politics.economics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
XPost: alt.global-warming
On 3/9/21 3:57 PM, Byker wrote:
On 6/28/2010 2:38 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
Dutch wrote
Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
Fred C. Dobbs wrote
Who is harmed if we stop raising livestock animals?
The animals that never got to live.
No, that's impossible. You can't harm something that doesn't exist.
Wrong, as always.
How so?
They were harmed by never getting to live.
Here, Bossy, Bossy: https://blog.ninapaley.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/shochet4.gif
Sometimes the critters don't want to co-operate: https://i.imgur.com/k5wrtl7.gif?noredirect
Millions upon millions of Buffalo were eating that same grass and
creating that same rich black soil that makes the growing of all the
crops in the Midwest USA possible.
Without all the Bovine or Buffalo sheep goats Deer processing that
prairie into soil, we will NOT be able to grow the plants to keep the
vegans alive and people will starve. So it takes millions of acres to
feed the beef to regenerate the soil and if we don't eat the beef we
have to grow more vegetables and grains but the soil won't make enough
greens and grains to feed millions of Bison or millions of Cattle and
grow the greens for the Billions of vegans as we see the Deer already
impact some farmers to the point that they harvest less and that
somewhere means a human has less to eat. So the Buffalo Bison Cattle
and Deer would have to be killed and that would mean that the soil would
NOT be regenerated as it's depleted through erosion and FARMING THE
PRODUCE OR GRAINS with the processes of bacteria and other demands that
are made, it would deplete the soil in just a few decades Sort of like
what's happening now in some areas where they quit raising Beef and the
land became less and less productive and less and less able to retain
water thanks to there being less organic matter and less carbon in the
soil. And wouldn't all that be causing more GLOBAL WARMING by having the
soil release more carbon than it sequesters? That is, if you buy the
fallacy that HUMANS are the cause of Global Warming.
The fact we eat beef has saved the planet from an earlier starvation of Billions. And it keeps the CO2 IN THE SOIL where it helps to grow more
plants for the Cattle and Deer and Humans to eat. Remember that plants
are carbon based and Bovine and other animals like sheep and goats and
chickens that eat and trample that green stuff also process it, and are returning the carbon back to the soil with the bacteria that the soil
needs to do the processing to use the organic material and the "dreaded poisonous carbon" that scares the children.
The process is a cycle of millions of years that Vegans want to change
and starve billions of humans to change.
Humans grew larger brains... than herbivores.... and we left the other
species behind in the dust who still eat a vegan diet. What we're
talking about is de-evolution, the vegans want to be apes in a jungle
picking nits out each others hair, because they will have no superior
brain function.
--
That's karma
Banning guns and de-funding police won't lower crime if you follow the Democrats Rhetoric. *And their very own Democrat actions confirm* that
even *they believe they're lying* since they're doing the opposite *to*
*reduce any crimes "you" might commit against the Government* that they
control and apparently they *believe guns and fences and police* *will* *protect* them from your crime and violence. So why won't those same
things protect you from crime and violence?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
