• The intent of child as compared with the intent of a parent, to have a

    From Treon Verdery@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 2 07:24:18 2023
    Brain scans, do they really prefer it, and how much, and how would the neural net prediction react to the most common distribution of actual mixed outcomes. The computed simulation of the child, as well as the parent’s getting what they prefer, just
    some of what they prefer, or what frequently unintended actually occurs. Note also software that says how you would feel about the distribution of things that are likely to happen.

    Child/parent wants to omit brushing baby teeth as they will be adult teeth later. outcome distribution: graphably Happier parent, graphably happier baby, likelihood of 1 dentist visit.
    If baby toothbrushing: you get to omit dental visit, graph of well being changes, this is comparable to other valuable activities. Brushing baby teeth from 0-8 years old caused a nonoptimality equivalent to not reading 1000 webcomics or missing having
    sex 30 times.
    Calculating the possible outcome value of actual child raising behaviors could be a data science thing with AI.

    Could there be something completely new that is kinder and more productive than intent? less information deficited than predictive choosing, yet notably an improvement? Note this area of finding improvement also rejects external regulation where some
    external tells you what to do.
    Various forms. Doing what you want, knowing as little as you do, I am Removing, but mentioning, being told what to do;pattern resonance craft jamming or reform; a New thing could be Neurological modelling of a human mind such that the decision that mind
    would make when at a heightened state of kindness and capability, or even just the best day out of 1000 for that biological person is the guiding activity activator.
    (modelling your better self and then using that as an action guide is an ethical bonus of transhumanism)
    Compare: Many worlds interpretation of physics: sometimes you are fortunate. Computer modelling: what you would do as a fortunate person, and how you can branch and act from there

    Social networking affirmations overlay; turn any facebook image feed item into a an inspirational quote, thus measurably upping its happiness utility. This only works if motivational quote images actually are measured to have a beneficial effect. Also,
    you can just suggest your entire feed (or just parts, variable reinforcement) be written on top of with inspirational quotes so the people you share images and updates with do not actually have to generate their own quote content.
    This is automemeing that is quantitatively measured as improving sense of capability, happiness, and perhaps measurables like at a search engine the person is measured to do more personal growth searches. I am thinking more personal development but one
    slight improvement could be automemeing stuff from one friend to encourage you to eat vegetables and exercise, then the amount of new search engine searches on vegetables and exercise could be measured as going up. Possibly career improving memes could
    be measured with career site searches and school.

    When you make gears out of fractals they can turn, slip, or polish depending on zoom. some person that knows math could comment on the infinite surface area effect on physical power transmission. kind of zenos paradox like though. supposedly even if
    you have fractal gears made out of dried egg white the infinitude of matching surfaces should permit the gears to transmit eentsy amounts of force over a vast multisurface fractal so the amount of force per tooth would be less than harms the tooth.

    People do all kinds of self improvement when awake. Aside from lucid dreaming, are there any things people can do to improve their asleep lives when they sleep? Something different than the beneficial but obvious sleep-the-optimal-amount. Transcranial
    magnetic stimulation during sleep might effect dreams or refreshingness of sleep. Should a person prefer to have slower or faster pulse while asleep with measurably minimized cortisol levels? this could be an approximately stressless good time that
    raises heartrate while you are unconscious. The 1/3 of hours each day sleeping can be thought of as a new area for human well being growth.

    wikipedia says, “Feminist theory typically characterizes patriarchy as a social construction, which can be overcome by revealing and critically analyzing its manifestations.” where some kinds of feminism, or perhaps female interest, could be imaged
    as a pie chart, where the refutation combined with the striving to redress nonoptimality is just one segment. Another segment could be “I’m partying with my friends in an all female group, and this is how we feel”, experienced femality, and
    someone could say something to those partyers that would benefit them or they could generate new better social ways on their own at their party. So promoting female well being could address these other parts of the pie chart even if they are not yet
    called feminism. The thing is are there any really big things which if they occur are deeply beneficial? Eternal youth with death optional benefits people.

    If an extroverted feminist of some kind talks to 10 people in a day, and an introverted one speaks to just one, is there some measure of the amount of felt social differential that happens? Then there is the actual stuff component, like they both use
    tampons.
    Overexercising the myers briggs, is there a ESFP femininism compared with a INTJ feminism? If someone makes a better personality sorter than the myers briggs should a new feminist ideology seek to come up with a “works well, actually benefits women and
    girls” version for each of the personality types?

    Thinking robot girlfriends, robot companions, is there a female preferred version. Robot girlfriends replace scarcity and nonoptimality with well being what are ways to do the same for women?

    Just for fun I could think about attracting the most optimal audience to my videos as compared with the most people. But the 1 million views mean 1% might be the preferred audience. So 10K optimal people with lots of views compared with somehow reaching
    10k of optimal viewers with some new thingy. million views might be looking better than that narrowcasting. unless I got a million views on ponytail elastics and wanted to communicate with skinheads. Yo Skinheads, practice eugenics, reject fascism.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)