On 12/31/24 4:54 PM, John Harshman wrote:
On 12/31/24 3:38 PM, erik simpson wrote:It's at 39.084523, -113.715651W. if that shows up in China, it's Google maps' fautl. Just change the sign. The age is from a geologic map for that part of Utah that doesn't have good resolution. I'me pretty
These are pictures of fossils stumbled upon by my son and me.
They're currently being examined by pros (Doug Erwin and Emma
Smith). We think they're Namacalathus. What do you think?
https://www.idrive.com/idrive/sh/sh?k=n8a8u1u6d0
It does rather resemble a series of cross-sections of Namacalathus.
Where was it found and do you know the age of the rock?
familiar with limestone from other locations, and the age is right at
the Ediacaran-Cambrian interface. It's the most easily accessible site imaginable. You can drive to it.
On 12/31/24 4:54 PM, John Harshman wrote:
On 12/31/24 3:38 PM, erik simpson wrote:It's at 39.084523, -113.715651W. if that shows up in China, it's Google maps' fautl. Just change the sign. The age is from a geologic map for that part of Utah that doesn't have good resolution. I'me pretty
These are pictures of fossils stumbled upon by my son and me.
They're currently being examined by pros (Doug Erwin and Emma
Smith). We think they're Namacalathus. What do you think?
https://www.idrive.com/idrive/sh/sh?k=n8a8u1u6d0
It does rather resemble a series of cross-sections of Namacalathus.
Where was it found and do you know the age of the rock?
familiar with limestone from other locations, and the age is right at
the Ediacaran-Cambrian interface. It's the most easily accessible site imaginable. You can drive to it.
On 12/31/24 8:22 PM, erik simpson wrote:
On 12/31/24 4:54 PM, John Harshman wrote:https://www.panix.com/shell/
On 12/31/24 3:38 PM, erik simpson wrote:It's at 39.084523, -113.715651W. if that shows up in China, it's Google
These are pictures of fossils stumbled upon by my son and me.
They're currently being examined by pros (Doug Erwin and Emma
Smith). We think they're Namacalathus. What do you think?
https://www.idrive.com/idrive/sh/sh?k=n8a8u1u6d0
It does rather resemble a series of cross-sections of Namacalathus.
Where was it found and do you know the age of the rock?
maps' fautl. Just change the sign. The age is from a geologic map for
that part of Utah that doesn't have good resolution. I'me pretty
familiar with limestone from other locations, and the age is right at
the Ediacaran-Cambrian interface. It's the most easily accessible site
imaginable. You can drive to it.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/winscp/
It is pretty idiot proof and for a lousy 10 dollars a month aside from
6gb or storage and a website you get email, unix shell, and USENET and
web interfaces for the whole thing
These are pictures of fossils stumbled upon by my son and me. They're currently being examined by pros (Doug Erwin and Emma Smith). We think they're Namacalathus. What do you think?
https://www.idrive.com/idrive/sh/sh?k=n8a8u1u6d0it is actually pretty fustrating. How hard is it to put an image on the internet
It's the most easily accessible site imaginable. You can drive to it.
On 12/31/24 11:14 PM, Popping Mad wrote:
On 1/1/25 2:11 AM, Popping Mad wrote:The links get stale pretty fast. This is today's link: https://www.idrive.com/idrive/sh/sh?k=j2o3n4y7z6
On 12/31/24 8:22 PM, erik simpson wrote:
On 12/31/24 4:54 PM, John Harshman wrote:https://www.panix.com/shell/
On 12/31/24 3:38 PM, erik simpson wrote:It's at 39.084523, -113.715651W. if that shows up in China, it's
These are pictures of fossils stumbled upon by my son and me.
They're currently being examined by pros (Doug Erwin and Emma
Smith). We think they're Namacalathus. What do you think?
https://www.idrive.com/idrive/sh/sh?k=n8a8u1u6d0
It does rather resemble a series of cross-sections of Namacalathus.
Where was it found and do you know the age of the rock?
maps' fautl. Just change the sign. The age is from a geologic map for >>>> that part of Utah that doesn't have good resolution. I'me pretty
familiar with limestone from other locations, and the age is right at
the Ediacaran-Cambrian interface. It's the most easily accessible site >>>> imaginable. You can drive to it.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/winscp/
It is pretty idiot proof and for a lousy 10 dollars a month aside from
6gb or storage and a website you get email, unix shell, and USENET and
web interfaces for the whole thing
https://www.panix.com/~mrbrklyn/coloringbook_cover.pdf
they even support https
The idrive link works for anybody.
On 1/1/25 1:23 PM, John Harshman wrote:http://images.mrbrklyn.com/los_angeles_2014/
On 12/31/24 10:55 PM, Popping Mad wrote:
On 12/31/24 8:22 PM, erik simpson wrote:Worked fine for me.
On 12/31/24 4:54 PM, John Harshman wrote:
On 12/31/24 3:38 PM, erik simpson wrote:It's at 39.084523, -113.715651W. if that shows up in China, it's
These are pictures of fossils stumbled upon by my son and me.
They're currently being examined by pros (Doug Erwin and Emma
Smith). We think they're Namacalathus. What do you think?
https://www.idrive.com/idrive/sh/sh?k=n8a8u1u6d0
It does rather resemble a series of cross-sections of Namacalathus.
Where was it found and do you know the age of the rock?
maps' fautl. Just change the sign. The age is from a geologic map for >>>> that part of Utah that doesn't have good resolution. I'me pretty
familiar with limestone from other locations, and the age is right at
the Ediacaran-Cambrian interface. It's the most easily accessible site >>>> imaginable. You can drive to it.
url is broken
Andy Knoll got back to me about the supposed Namacalathus; they're
actually just Archaeocyathids. Oh well, my son already told me they
looked like that. Unremarkable, as they're quite common.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 09:50:04 |
| Calls: | 12,100 |
| Files: | 15,003 |
| Messages: | 6,517,972 |
