1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.BIO.PALEONTOLOGY

  • "Dickinsonia" at the Bhimbetka rock shelter

    From erik simpson@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 16 16:54:28 2023
    An amusing pair of papers in Gondwana Research deal with an apparent remarkable find that subsequently fell on the floor (literally!). The first reports the discovery, the second the denouement (the "fossil" was actually a beehive.)

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1342937X20303038?via%3Dihub
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1342937X23000254

    The lead author of he first is Greg Retallack, known for his theory that Dickinsonia is actually a terrestrial lichen. He gracefully acknowledges the error in identification.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Harshman@21:1/5 to erik simpson on Thu Feb 16 18:08:22 2023
    On 2/16/23 4:54 PM, erik simpson wrote:
    An amusing pair of papers in Gondwana Research deal with an apparent remarkable find that subsequently fell on the floor (literally!). The first reports the discovery, the second the denouement (the "fossil" was actually a beehive.)

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1342937X20303038?via%3Dihub
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1342937X23000254

    The lead author of he first is Greg Retallack, known for his theory that Dickinsonia is actually a terrestrial lichen. He gracefully acknowledges the error in identification.

    I doubt that it's possible to acknowledge that error gracefully. I'm
    assuming that his only contact with the fossil was through photos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From erik simpson@21:1/5 to John Harshman on Fri Feb 17 09:47:28 2023
    On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 6:08:29 PM UTC-8, John Harshman wrote:
    On 2/16/23 4:54 PM, erik simpson wrote:
    An amusing pair of papers in Gondwana Research deal with an apparent remarkable find that subsequently fell on the floor (literally!). The first reports the discovery, the second the denouement (the "fossil" was actually a beehive.)

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1342937X20303038?via%3Dihub
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1342937X23000254

    The lead author of he first is Greg Retallack, known for his theory that Dickinsonia is actually a terrestrial lichen. He gracefully acknowledges the error in identification.
    I doubt that it's possible to acknowledge that error gracefully. I'm
    assuming that his only contact with the fossil was through photos.

    Photos it is. The original paper described the "fossil" as "in plain sight" but "inacccessible".
    It's hard to understand why it couldn't have been examined at closer range, but the site is
    famous for its paintings and maybe there are restictions on what could be done? Embarrassing for
    sure.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)