• [OSG] FLAT EARTH End Times Bible Study - REVELATION 3 of 22

    From Original Science Gangster@21:1/5 to All on Wed Sep 25 19:15:40 2024
    XPost: alt.astronomy, alt.uk.misc.flat-earth

    FLAT EARTH End Times Bible Study - REVELATION 3 of 22 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SzZpXYfmww

    A great Flat Earth Sermon Series from Pastor Tyler J. Doka of Great Harvest Baptist Church. This is part 3 of 22. Pastor Doka will walk us through the book of Revelation chapter by chapter...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kualinar@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 26 12:38:08 2024
    XPost: alt.astronomy, alt.uk.misc.flat-earth

    Le 2024-09-25 à 15:15, Original Science Gangster a écrit :
    FLAT EARTH End Times Bible Study - REVELATION 3 of 22 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SzZpXYfmww

    The bible is NOT an accurate source about pretty much anything. Written
    by men, modified by men, edited by men. Some times by negligence, some
    times by accident, MANY times intentionally.
    Also, WITCH version of the bible. JUST in English, there are a few
    THOUSANDS, and they all contradict one another on some points.
    They don't all agree about the holy trinity.
    They don't all agree about the divinity of Jesus.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Science Guy@21:1/5 to Kualinar on Thu Sep 26 18:03:41 2024
    XPost: alt.astronomy, alt.uk.misc.flat-earth

    On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 12:38:08 -0400
    Kualinar <[email protected]> wrote:

    Le 2024-09-25 à 15:15, Original Science Gangster a écrit :
    FLAT EARTH End Times Bible Study - REVELATION 3 of 22 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SzZpXYfmww

    The bible is NOT an accurate source about pretty much anything.
    Written by men, modified by men, edited by men. Some times by
    negligence, some times by accident, MANY times intentionally.
    Also, WITCH version of the bible. JUST in English, there are a few THOUSANDS, and they all contradict one another on some points.
    They don't all agree about the holy trinity.
    They don't all agree about the divinity of Jesus.

    The science book is NOT an accurate source about pretty much anything.
    Written by men, modified by men, edited by men. Some times by
    negligence, some times by accident, MANY times intentionally.
    Also, WITCH version of the textbook? JUST in English, there are a few THOUSANDS, and they all contradict one another on some points.
    They don't all agree about the holy big bang.
    They don't all agree about the divinity of Darwin.

    You have no idea what constitutes a valid argument or proof.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kualinar@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 27 10:27:56 2024
    XPost: alt.astronomy, alt.uk.misc.flat-earth

    Le 2024-09-26 à 14:03, Science Guy a écrit :
    On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 12:38:08 -0400
    Kualinar <[email protected]> wrote:

    Le 2024-09-25 à 15:15, Original Science Gangster a écrit :
    FLAT EARTH End Times Bible Study - REVELATION 3 of 22
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SzZpXYfmww

    The bible is NOT an accurate source about pretty much anything.
    Written by men, modified by men, edited by men. Some times by
    negligence, some times by accident, MANY times intentionally.
    Also, WITCH version of the bible. JUST in English, there are a few
    THOUSANDS, and they all contradict one another on some points.
    They don't all agree about the holy trinity.
    They don't all agree about the divinity of Jesus.

    The science book is NOT an accurate source about pretty much anything.
    Changing «bible» with «science book» do NOT support your point. It just show that you are trying to diminish the scientific process to the level
    of a religion.
    Written by men, modified by men, edited by men. Some times by
    You forget CORRECTED by men when errors are found.
    negligence, some times by accident, MANY times intentionally.
    Also, WITCH version of the textbook? JUST in English, there are a few THOUSANDS, and they all contradict one another on some points.
    They don't all agree about the holy big bang.
    About all cosmologists DO agree about the Big Bang. NOBODY regard the
    Big Bang as «holy». That's an apologist's claim.
    They don't all agree about the divinity of Darwin.
    NOBODY ever regard Charles Darwin as «divine». He's JUST the guy who
    laid the basis of the scientific theory of evolution. The fact of
    evolution having been known for about 2000 years.
    Again, you are pushing another bad claim from apologists.

    You have no idea what constitutes a valid argument or proof.

    There is a huge difference between the bible and a science book:
    The bible is claimed to be the UNCHANGING word of god, or, at least god inspired. The bible claims to be The Truth.
    The science book get changed as new observations, new evidences become available. The science aims to learn and better understand the world we
    live in.

    Science DO NOT prove things. Science often DISPROVE things.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)