• James Webb telescope images challenge theories how universe evolved

    From Jan Panteltje@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 16 04:56:21 2023
    James Webb Space Telescope images challenge theories of how universe evolved https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/04/230413154323.htm

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lou@21:1/5 to Jan Panteltje on Sun Apr 16 00:35:12 2023
    On Sunday, 16 April 2023 at 05:56:24 UTC+1, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    James Webb Space Telescope images challenge theories of how universe evolved https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/04/230413154323.htm
    “We'll require something very new about galaxy formation or a modification to cosmology. One of the most extreme possibilities is that the universe was expanding faster shortly after the Big Bang than we predict, which might require new forces and
    particles."
    These BBT people just don’t give up with their idiotic excuses.
    Next they will be saying time went backwards at the beginning
    of the BBT and we are looking backwards at the mature universe.
    And to think it all started when the priest LeMaitre used the
    creation myth on astrophysics to save Einsteins silly photon.
    Get rid of the photon and you lose all the other religious nonsense
    from physics. Like QT, BBT, dark matter, black holes etc.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jan Panteltje@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sun Apr 16 09:06:55 2023
    On a sunny day (Sun, 16 Apr 2023 00:35:12 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Lou <[email protected]> wrote in <[email protected]>:

    On Sunday, 16 April 2023 at 05:56:24 UTC+1, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    James Webb Space Telescope images challenge theories of how universe evol= >ved
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/04/230413154323.htm
    “We'll require something very new about galaxy formation or a modif= >ication to cosmology. One of the most extreme possibilities is that the uni= >verse was expanding faster shortly after the Big Bang than we predict, whic= >h might require new forces and particles."
    These BBT people just don’t give up with their idiotic excuses.
    Next they will be saying time went backwards at the beginning
    of the BBT and we are looking backwards at the mature universe.
    And to think it all started when the priest LeMaitre used the
    creation myth on astrophysics to save Einsteins silly photon.
    Get rid of the photon and you lose all the other religious nonsense
    from physics. Like QT, BBT, dark matter, black holes etc.

    Yes, photon is just a mathematical construction, NOT a particle.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lou@21:1/5 to Jan Panteltje on Sun Apr 16 06:16:24 2023
    On Sunday, 16 April 2023 at 10:06:58 UTC+1, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On a sunny day (Sun, 16 Apr 2023 00:35:12 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Lou
    wrote in
    <[email protected]>:
    On Sunday, 16 April 2023 at 05:56:24 UTC+1, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    James Webb Space Telescope images challenge theories of how universe evol=
    ved
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/04/230413154323.htm
    “We'll require something very new about galaxy formation or a modif= >ication to cosmology. One of the most extreme possibilities is that the uni=
    verse was expanding faster shortly after the Big Bang than we predict, whic= >h might require new forces and particles."
    These BBT people just don’t give up with their idiotic excuses.
    Next they will be saying time went backwards at the beginning
    of the BBT and we are looking backwards at the mature universe.
    And to think it all started when the priest LeMaitre used the
    creation myth on astrophysics to save Einsteins silly photon.
    Get rid of the photon and you lose all the other religious nonsense
    from physics. Like QT, BBT, dark matter, black holes etc.
    Yes, photon is just a mathematical construction, NOT a particle.
    Even Planck said that. He disagreed for his whole life that his constant
    meant light was a particle. He said it was a mathematical fix.
    Notice the low IQ computer programmers writing the lies on wiki physics,
    think they are physicists. And put his constant under a QT wiki page.As if Planck ever agreed to anything these QT types ever said.
    What Rayleigh Jeans ignored was obvious. They assumed
    In their formula that If a blackbody gave off radiation the energy
    released would be proportional to the frequency.
    That’s how good maths leads to bad physics.
    Because they forgot that higher frequency radiation
    was more energetic and thus should be apportioned less
    of the total energy released in their R-J formula.
    Fortunately Planck saw how stupid these aetherists and
    future relativists were and added a fix to the formula
    Unfortunately these stupid aetherists were good at
    one thing only. They were good at maths but nothing else.
    They then became relativists and continued to spout bad science
    and twist plancks intentions to their own deranged beliefs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)