• =?UTF-8?Q?=e2=80=98Uniquely_human=e2=80=99_language_capacity_found_?= =

    From Primum Sapienti@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 6 23:22:28 2025
    https://www.science.org/content/article/uniquely-human-language-capacity-found-bonobos

    Human language can combine words to create
    an infinite number of meanings—an ability
    that gives language its expressive power and
    sets it apart from the communication of other
    animals. Now, researchers have found a more
    modest version of this ability in bonobos,
    our closest living relative. The apes can
    combine different calls to create new
    meanings, the team reports this week in
    Science.
    ...
    Previous studies have found that other animal
    species can combine their calls, but only in
    “trivial” combinations that simply add the
    meanings together. Human language is much more
    powerful: Speakers can combine words into more
    than the sum of their parts. For instance,
    “tall cook” is a trivial combination—it means
    someone who is tall and a cook. But “good cook”
    is not someone who is good and a cook: They
    might be good at cooking, but terrible in
    other areas—perhaps a dangerous driver. This
    combination of words generates a new meaning.
    ...
    To find out whether bonobos are capable of making
    these “nontrivial” combinations, University of
    Zürich (UZH) animal communication researcher
    Mélissa Berthet spent 8 months following wild
    bonobo groups in the Kokolopori Bonobo Reserve
    in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Every
    day, she and her guides set out at about 4 a.m.
    to find the bonobos before they left their
    overnight nests, then tracked them all day.
    Whenever she had a clear view of their
    activities, she recorded every vocalization,
    along with all its context: who made it, what
    they were doing, how other animals responded,
    and even what the weather was like. Any number
    of more than 300 contextual features could be
    linked with each call. Eventually, Berthet
    started to understand some of what the animals
    were communicating: “You see a vocalization
    and then everybody moves … and it’s very
    satisfying to be like, ‘Ah, I think I start to
    get it,’” she says.

    Berthet recorded 700 different vocalizations,
    many of which were combinations of two
    distinct calls, like “whistle and peep” or
    “high hoot and low hoot.” To see whether the
    animals were creating new meanings from these
    combinations, the team borrowed an approach
    from human language studies, statistically
    analyzing how much context the vocalizations
    shared with each other. (In human language,
    words that occur in similar contexts tend to
    be more closely related in meaning.)

    Three combinations stood out: Their meanings
    appeared different enough from those of their
    constituent calls that they seemed to count
    as nontrivial combinations. “High hoot and
    low hoot” was one of these. “Low hoot,” the
    team found, is often used in situations of
    high excitement, and appears to mean
    something like “I am excited.” “High hoot” is
    used when bonobos want to alert others to
    their presence and may mean “Pay attention to
    me.” But the combination of the two calls
    doesn’t simply mean “I am excited, pay
    attention to me”; instead, it conveys a more
    nuanced message. It is used specifically when
    another individual is putting on an aggressive
    display. The bonobo using this call
    combination might be trying to stop the other
    individual from displaying or get others in
    the group to pay attention to the caller, the
    authors suggest.

    The findings suggest bonobos have a
    “precursor” to the human capacity to combine
    units of language to create new meanings, says
    senior author Simon Townsend, a primate
    communication researcher at UZH. Both bonobos
    and humans may have inherited the ability from
    our common ancestor some 7 million years ago,
    he says.
    ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mario Petrinovic@21:1/5 to Primum Sapienti on Tue Apr 8 15:27:13 2025
    On 7.4.2025. 7:22, Primum Sapienti wrote:

    https://www.science.org/content/article/uniquely-human-language- capacity-found-bonobos

    Human language can combine words to create
    an infinite number of meanings—an ability
    that gives language its expressive power and
    sets it apart from the communication of other
    animals. Now, researchers have found a more
    modest version of this ability in bonobos,
    our closest living relative. The apes can
    combine different calls to create new
    meanings, the team reports this week in
    Science.
    ...
    Previous studies have found that other animal
    species can combine their calls, but only in
    “trivial” combinations that simply add the
    meanings together. Human language is much more
    powerful: Speakers can combine words into more
    than the sum of their parts. For instance,
    “tall cook” is a trivial combination—it means
    someone who is tall and a cook. But “good cook”
    is not someone who is good and a cook: They
    might be good at cooking, but terrible in
    other areas—perhaps a dangerous driver. This
    combination of words generates a new meaning.
    ...
    To find out whether bonobos are capable of making
    these “nontrivial” combinations, University of
    Zürich (UZH) animal communication researcher
    Mélissa Berthet spent 8 months following wild
    bonobo groups in the Kokolopori Bonobo Reserve
    in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Every
    day, she and her guides set out at about 4 a.m.
    to find the bonobos before they left their
    overnight nests, then tracked them all day.
    Whenever she had a clear view of their
    activities, she recorded every vocalization,
    along with all its context: who made it, what
    they were doing, how other animals responded,
    and even what the weather was like. Any number
    of more than 300 contextual features could be
    linked with each call. Eventually, Berthet
    started to understand some of what the animals
    were communicating: “You see a vocalization
    and then everybody moves … and it’s very
    satisfying to be like, ‘Ah, I think I start to
    get it,’” she says.

    Berthet recorded 700 different vocalizations,
    many of which were combinations of two
    distinct calls, like “whistle and peep” or
    “high hoot and low hoot.” To see whether the
    animals were creating new meanings from these
    combinations, the team borrowed an approach
    from human language studies, statistically
    analyzing how much context the vocalizations
    shared with each other. (In human language,
    words that occur in similar contexts tend to
    be more closely related in meaning.)

    Three combinations stood out: Their meanings
    appeared different enough from those of their
    constituent calls that they seemed to count
    as nontrivial combinations. “High hoot and
    low hoot” was one of these. “Low hoot,” the
    team found, is often used in situations of
    high excitement, and appears to mean
    something like “I am excited.” “High hoot” is
    used when bonobos want to alert others to
    their presence and may mean “Pay attention to
    me.” But the combination of the two calls
    doesn’t simply mean “I am excited, pay
    attention to me”; instead, it conveys a more
    nuanced message. It is used specifically when
    another individual is putting on an aggressive
    display. The bonobo using this call
    combination might be trying to stop the other
    individual from displaying or get others in
    the group to pay attention to the caller, the
    authors suggest.

    The findings suggest bonobos have a
    “precursor” to the human capacity to combine
    units of language to create new meanings, says
    senior author Simon Townsend, a primate
    communication researcher at UZH. Both bonobos
    and humans may have inherited the ability from
    our common ancestor some 7 million years ago,
    he says.
    ...

    First, the common ancestor for sure isn't 7 mya if Danuvius is 11.6
    mya. Whoever claims it is, is an idiot.
    Second, this is the prime example of bias in science, if you look hard
    enough you will find exactly what you want to find. Our language is far
    above "high hoot" and "low hoot", and a completely different thing,
    since all our communication mostly is placed above waterline (eyes, face expression, sounds). Why they don't have visible whites of the eyes, or
    face expressions, if we inherited something from common ancestor.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)