• Vatican and science

    From Mario Petrinovic@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 16 09:06:59 2024
    Once, in a discussion, some Catholic said to me that I will never be
    happy because I will not feel the love from God, or something. I told
    her that, from my experience, most radical Catholic believers are
    handicapped people looking for salvation, on which she shut up. In the
    next video enough is to watch it for a minute: https://youtu.be/l1BQLl59M-w?si=fsFF58E1IocunOZA&t=133

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mario Petrinovic@21:1/5 to JTEM on Sat Sep 21 17:26:02 2024
    On 21.9.2024. 12:39, JTEM wrote:
     Mario Petrinovic wrote:
             Once, in a discussion, some Catholic said to me that I will >> never be happy because I will not feel the love from God, or something.

    That sounds like someone from every religion.

    I told her that, from my experience, most radical Catholic believers
    are handicapped people looking for salvation, on which she shut up.

    Must've been your non-verbal queues -- volume, tone, facial expression
    or even body language, because that's not exactly a show-stopper of a response.

    They're not saying anything that is not implied by (if not expressly
    stated) by others, going back decades earlier.

    It's also just redefining the term "Beginning" and, if you think about
    it, redefining "Nothing."

    But I've often pointed this out in the past:  Time and space are
    products or features of our universe. Both only exist within the
    universe.

    Using our universe to decipher it's origins is a bit like using a
    CooCoo Clock to compose the image of the clock maker... You can no
    more "See God" in the universe than glimpse the clock maker.

    This thought experiment is even more interesting if you remove "You"
    and make it an alien who knows nothing about our species or culture.
    Like if one day a CooCoo Clock just appeared out of nowhere, ripped
    through a wormhole in space, maybe. What could he learn about the
    clock maker -- his species, his likeness -- from examining this
    clock?

    This would be infinitely easier than ascertaining the origins of
    SpaceTime from looking at SpaceTime...

    There is no "time". What we call "time" is just the manifestation of
    irreversibility of the Universe. Once something starts it cannot be stopped.
    On the other hand, "space" is infinite. It is everything. It doesn't
    have beginning, you cannot shape it, it is bigger than anything else
    within it, everything else is within space.
    Now, these are very simple and logical things, whether one can grasp
    it (including me) is a different matter, but this is simple and true.
    Now, a lot of people create their own fairy tales, and they want
    Universe to be per their measure. Well, their measure isn't true. So, we
    will hear about fairy tells forever, because people will never be smart
    enough to live in reality. People are ambitious, greedy, and stupid.
    They will newer contract themselves into the simple shape of the reality.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mario Petrinovic@21:1/5 to JTEM on Sat Sep 21 22:54:20 2024
    On 21.9.2024. 19:59, JTEM wrote:
     Mario Petrinovic wrote:
             There is no "time". What we call "time"

    Well. There is actually, and we all experience it.

    "Time" is what separates the seed from the tree, the fish
    from the fossil, life from death.

    is just the manifestation of irreversibility of the Universe.

    As far as I know, there's nothing that says it's irreversible.

    Don't place your limitations on the universe.

             On the other hand, "space" is infinite. It is everything. It
    doesn't have beginning, you cannot shape it, it is bigger than
    anything else within it, everything else is within space.

    As the video pointed out, "Beginning" isn't quite right. Time only
    exists within the universe so there is no "Before." It's probably
    better to think in terms of "Origins."

    There is always "before", but there isn't a time. One thing leads to
    the other, it doesn't mean that you can call this process "time". And,
    you cannot go back ("in time"), you can only continue.

             Now, these are very simple and logical things

    Logic isn't truth. Most times it isn't even logical. It's merely what
    seems logical to a particular person. Darwin used what passed for
    "Logic" in his mind, and it bore superficial resemblance to any actual logic...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)