Do Enhydra & other otters have rel.large brains? Lutra?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Op zaterdag 29 juli 2023 om 16:33:55 UTC+2 schreef [email protected]:

Do Enhydra & other otters have rel.large brains? Lutra?

Sorry, I meant: do Lutra & other otters have rel.large brains?
I'm esp. interested in Enhydra vs other otters.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

[email protected] wrote:

Op zaterdag 29 juli 2023 om 16:33:55 UTC+2 schreef [email protected]:

Do Enhydra & other otters have rel.large brains? Lutra?

Sorry, I meant: do Lutra & other otters have rel.large brains?
I'm esp. interested in Enhydra vs other otters.

A DHA rich diet never insures a larger brain. At best, it can only ensure a brain as large as genetics will allow.

Our human brains are dependent upon DHA. We require a lot of it. This
doesn't mean that exposure to DHA results in large brains. It requires
that our ancestors evolved under conditions which were so rich in DHA
that we could be dependent upon it and STILL thrive.

Brain size is an excellent test for human evolution BECAUSE we are so
dependent upon DHA.

If we find a population on the coast, exploiting marine resources, and
another landlocked, the coastal population should have measurably
larger brains as a group.

So if we hunt for fossils where Sundaland used to be, and compare
them to landlocked African fossils, the Sundaland finds should
display measurably larger brains... BECAUSE of their diets.

It's not magic. Diet is know to affect humans physically. MODERN
humans are supposedly not getting enough DHA, even though we
are supposedly much better at synthesizing DHA from ALA than
our ancestors were... we're still bad at it.

Again, the issue isn't that exposure to DHA results in huge brains.
The issue is that humans are dependent upon DHA, and we just
plain couldn't be unless we evolved under circumstances where it
was abundant.





-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/719144199654621184

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 07:33:53 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:

Do Enhydra & other otters have rel.large brains? Lutra?

You already asked this 4 months ago: https://groups.google.com/g/sci.anthropology.paleo/c/v-KIZewRWVA/m/ReCgpEYoCwAJ

Are you becoming senile?

See supplementary Data 2 in:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-03748-4

Otters, in particular Enhydra en Lutra, are not exceptionally
encephalized among mustelids.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Pandora wrote:

[...]

Hey, mongoloid; You ONCE AGAIN display your stupidity.

You're disarticulated. You can't form coherent thoughts, much less
models. You think if you can attack a piece then the whole model
vanishes. And you think this because you're an idiot.

Humans evolved under circumstances in which DHA was available
in abundance. Period.

Our dependence on DHA proves we evolved under circumstances
where DHA was available in abundance.

Turn back the clock, human ancestors were LESS capable of
synthesizing DHA, not more so. Relying entirely on synthesizing
DHA from ALA is considered inadequate TODAY, it was WORSE
in the past, before adaptions for improved synthesis. So our
ancestors were MORE not less dependent upon marine resources.

But it's just one piece of the puzzle, one part of a large, coherent
model that you constantly remind us you are unable to fathom.

The DHA matches up with the Aquatic Ape. Aquatic Ape matches
exactly with Coastal Dispersal. Coastal Dispersal explains HOW
and WHY our ancestors spread across continents. It matches the
evidence of different populations (multiregionalism), explains why
that is, explains how they remained one species.

It's an entire model. And you've got nothing except some confused, disarticulated thoughts that you were trained to regurgitate.





-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/723715112974893056

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Op zondag 30 juli 2023 om 11:03:03 UTC+2 schreef JTEM is so reasonable:

[email protected] wrote:

Op zaterdag 29 juli 2023 om 16:33:55 UTC+2 schreef [email protected]:

Do Enhydra & other otters have rel.large brains? Lutra?

Sorry, I meant: do Lutra & other otters have rel.large brains?
I'm esp. interested in Enhydra vs other otters.

A DHA rich diet never insures a larger brain. At best, it can only ensure a brain as large as genetics will allow.
Our human brains are dependent upon DHA. We require a lot of it. This
doesn't mean that exposure to DHA results in large brains. It requires
that our ancestors evolved under conditions which were so rich in DHA
that we could be dependent upon it and STILL thrive.
Brain size is an excellent test for human evolution BECAUSE we are so dependent upon DHA.
If we find a population on the coast, exploiting marine resources, and another landlocked, the coastal population should have measurably
larger brains as a group.
So if we hunt for fossils where Sundaland used to be, and compare
them to landlocked African fossils, the Sundaland finds should
display measurably larger brains... BECAUSE of their diets.
It's not magic. Diet is know to affect humans physically. MODERN
humans are supposedly not getting enough DHA, even though we
are supposedly much better at synthesizing DHA from ALA than
our ancestors were... we're still bad at it.
Again, the issue isn't that exposure to DHA results in huge brains.
The issue is that humans are dependent upon DHA, and we just
plain couldn't be unless we evolved under circumstances where it
was abundant.

Why did H.neand. have much larger brains than H.erectus?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Op zondag 30 juli 2023 om 14:17:33 UTC+2 schreef Pandora:

On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 07:33:53 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]"

Do Enhydra & other otters have rel.large brains? Lutra?

You already asked this 4 months ago: https://groups.google.com/g/sci.anthropology.paleo/c/v-KIZewRWVA/m/ReCgpEYoCwAJ
Are you becoming senile?

When prof.Tobias said "All the former savannah supporters (including myself) must now swallow our earlier words in the light of the new results from the early hominid deposits... savannah is eliminated as a primary cause, or selective advantage of
bipedalism...", he also was called "becoming senile" by the kudu runners... Have you already caught your antelope, my boy?? :-DDD

At least 8 *independent* scientific facts show that Pleistocene archaic Homo were semi-aquatic:
• Archaic Homo's atypical tooth-wear was caused by "sand and oral processing of marine mollusks" Towle cs 2022 doi 10.1002/ajpa.24500.
• H.erectus s.s. fossilized typically (always?) in coastal sediments, e.g. Mojokerto amid barnacles & corals, Trinil amid Pseudodon & Elongaria, Sangiran-17 in "brackish marsh near the coast".
• Stephen Munro discovered sea-shell engravings made by H.erectus (Joordens cs 2015 Nature 518:228–231).
• Ear exostoses (H.erectus & H.neand.) develop after years of cold(er) water irrigation.
• Pachyosteosclerosis is typically & exclusively seen in slow+shallow-diving tetrapods (de Buffrénil cs 2010 J.Mamm.Evol.17:101–120), e.g. erectus' parietal bone is 2x as thick as in gorillas.
• Brain enlargement++ (e.g. Odontocetes, Pinnipedia) is facilitated by sea-food, e.g. DHA docosahexaenoic acid in shellfish etc.
• Homo’s stone tool use & manual dexterity is typical for molluscivores: sea-otters etc.
• Pleistocene Homo even colonized overseas islands (Flores & later even Luzon), google “coastal dispersal Pleistocene Homo”.

IOW, it's really not difficult: even kudu runners must be able to understand?

Google
-aquarboreal
-gondwanatalk verhaegen
:-)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 03:15:43 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:

Op zondag 30 juli 2023 om 14:17:33 UTC+2 schreef Pandora:

On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 07:33:53 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]"

Do Enhydra & other otters have rel.large brains? Lutra?

You already asked this 4 months ago:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.anthropology.paleo/c/v-KIZewRWVA/m/ReCgpEYoCwAJ
Are you becoming senile?

Brain enlargement++ (e.g. Odontocetes, Pinnipedia) is facilitated by sea-food, e.g. DHA docosahexaenoic acid in shellfish etc.

"When compared with an average mammal of similar body size, pinnipeds
(seals, sea lions, fur seals, and walruses) have encephalization
quotients similar to those of terrestrial carnivores. Odontocete
cetaceans (toothed whales), with the exception of the sperm whale
(Physeter catodon), have relative brain sizes larger than expected,
similar to the anthropoid primates. Sirenians (dugongs and manatees),
the sperm whale, and the mysticete cetaceans (baleen whales) all have
relative brain sizes smaller than the mammalian average and similar to
the large ungulates."
https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/284579

See also:
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abe2101

So, if odontocete cetaceans have EQs similar to anthropoid primates,
how did the latter grow such relatively large brains without seafood?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Op maandag 31 juli 2023 om 15:41:03 UTC+2 schreef Pandora:

On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 03:15:43 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]"

Do Enhydra & other otters have rel.large brains? Lutra?

You already asked this 4 months ago:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.anthropology.paleo/c/v-KIZewRWVA/m/ReCgpEYoCwAJ
Are you becoming senile?

Much less than you apparently: when prof.Tobias said "All the former savannah supporters (incl. myself) must now swallow our earlier words in the light of the new results from the early hominid deposits" & "savannah is eliminated as a primary cause, or
selective advantage of bipedalism", he also was called "becoming senile" by the kudu runners... :-DDD Have you already caught your antelope, my boy?? :-DDD

At least 8 *independent* scientific facts show that Pleistocene archaic Homo were semi-aquatic:
• Archaic Homo's atypical tooth-wear was caused by "sand and oral processing of marine mollusks" Towle cs 2022 doi 10.1002/ajpa.24500.
• H.erectus s.s. fossilized typically (always?) in coastal sediments, e.g. Mojokerto amid barnacles & corals, Trinil amid Pseudodon & Elongaria, Sangiran-17 in "brackish marsh near the coast".
• Stephen Munro discovered sea-shell engravings made by H.erectus (Joordens cs 2015 Nature 518:228–231).
• Ear exostoses (H.erectus & H.neand.) develop after years of cold(er) water irrigation.
• Pachyosteosclerosis is typically & exclusively seen in slow+shallow-diving tetrapods (de Buffrénil cs 2010 J.Mamm.Evol.17:101–120), e.g. erectus' parietal bone is 2x as thick as in gorillas.
• Brain enlargement (e.g. Odontocetes, Pinnipedia) is facilitated by sea-food, e.g. DHA docosahexaenoic acid in shellfish etc.
• Homo’s stone tool use & manual dexterity is typical for molluscivores: sea-otters etc.
• Pleistocene Homo even colonized overseas islands (Flores & later even Luzon), google “coastal dispersal Pleistocene Homo”.
IOW, it's really not difficult: only incredibly idiotic imbeciles still deny that our recent ancestors were (semi)aquatic:
IOW, even kudu runners like you must be able to understand??

"When compared with an average mammal of similar body size, pinnipeds (seals, sea lions, fur seals, and walruses) have encephalization
quotients similar to those of terrestrial carnivores. Odontocete
cetaceans (toothed whales), with the exception of the sperm whale
(Physeter catodon), have relative brain sizes larger than expected,
similar to the anthropoid primates. Sirenians (dugongs and manatees),
the sperm whale, and the mysticete cetaceans (baleen whales) all have relative brain sizes smaller than the mammalian average and similar to
the large ungulates." https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/284579
See also:
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abe2101

Thanks a lot, my boy, yes, most aquatic mammals (generally larger body sizes than terrestrial mammals) have larger brains than equally large terrestrial mammals, but nobody ever said (semi)aquaticism explains everything.
Is it a coincidence that mammals that recently evolved from (semi)aquatic to terrestrial have unexpectedly-large brains? e.g. neandertals & elephants? is this why Hn has larger brains than He & Hs? Hn>Hs>>He>>apes-apiths.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

[email protected] wrote:

Why did H.neand. have much larger brains than H.erectus?

Hard to find any credible science in the present hellscape, now
that everything is propaganda, but...

https://www.themarysue.com/cold-climates-bigger-brains/

Oh, TONS of cites claiming Gwobull Warbling is shrinking brains,
but, like I said, that's all propaganda. However, I have long hear,
even if i never expressed much interest in, the claim that bigger
brains correlate with colder climates.

In truth, I have no idea.

There is proof, I won't even say "Evidence," that some Neanderthals
exploiting the sea rather extensively.

And during events like Toba, they pretty much had to. Life inland
would have gotten pretty rough.

I used to think that it was a different solution to the same problem:

Neanderthals got smarter by building bigger brains, other populations
built better brains... fit the same "Smarts" into a smaller space. AND
THEN when the larger brains met with the smarter brains, we got
both: Bigger brains that were also smarter per square inch.

But that was just a pet theory of mine. Never really looked into it.

And, again, I can recall many claims, over the years, that colder climates spawned bigger brains.






-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/724385546279976960

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

JTEM is so reasonable wrote:

Pandora wrote:

[...]

Humans evolved under circumstances in which DHA was available
in abundance. Period.

Hey, mongoloid - do otters eat a lot of DHA containing foods?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

JTEM is so reasonable wrote:

In truth, I have no idea.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Primum Sapienti wrote:

do otters eat a

Tell us about ottors. You think you have a point, but you are an idiot,
so break it down down for us. How dependent are ottors on DHA?
What percentage of their brains are DHA?

We know humans are dependent upon it. We know humans don't
synthesize enough. We know humans evolved under circumstances
where DHA was abundanant. You seem to think that ottors change
or alter some of this... you don't know how or why... not much you
know, actually, which explains that, um,. we'll say "Unconventional"
aroma you carry around...




-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/724349278678614016

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Please. Only one reply per sock puppet, per thread.

Thank you.






-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/724349278678614016

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

[email protected] wrote:

Op maandag 31 juli 2023 om 15:41:03 UTC+2 schreef Pandora:

On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 03:15:43 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]"

Do Enhydra & other otters have rel.large brains? Lutra?

You already asked this 4 months ago:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.anthropology.paleo/c/v-KIZewRWVA/m/ReCgpEYoCwAJ
Are you becoming senile?

Much less than you apparently: when prof.Tobias said "All the former savannah supporters (incl. myself) must now swallow our earlier words in the light of the new results from the early hominid deposits" & "savannah is eliminated as a primary cause,

or selective advantage of bipedalism", he also was called "becoming senile" by

And in what decade did he say that? Hint - he died in 2012. We
have far more data now than then.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Primum Sapienti wrote:

And in what decade did he say that? Hint - he died in 2012. We

What the FUCK is wrong with you?

School's out, child. You don't win any points by regurgitating a
reading verbatim. From the day they gave you that GED it was
all about APPLYING knowledge. No, no what you learned but
what you did with it...

Despite all your many, many, many, many, many, many failings,
humans require DHA and we require a lot of it. We're not great
at synthesizing it NOW, and we're better at it now than our
ancestors were in the distant past. So we evolved under
circumstances where this DHA was plentiful.

DHA = Aquatic Ape

Coastal Dispersal = Aquatic Ape

Good luck trying to grasp a word of this!


-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/724820386985934848

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

OCPD, Primum Sapienti wrote:

[...]

We don't have much time before the FBI catches up to you
so let me just say that you're an idiot. You're batshit crazy
as well, highly disordered, but a goddamn idiot.

It doesn't matter what ottors or mice or bullfrogs need or
how large their brains are. A DHA diet doesn't ensure a
large brain, it ensures a brain just as large as genetics will
allow. Humans were under a great deal of selective pressure
to be problem solvers -- get smart.

Dolphins can never match us, no matter what, not without
evolving to leave the oceans and walk on dry land. One
rather obvious reason for this is their lack of useful hands,
opposable thumbs. Another is that fire doesn't work so
well under the water. Oh, there are molten rocks under the
sea... for a little while. Until they cool. But if a dolphin got
close enough to try and smelt iron it would be cooked
before it had its first attempt.

And, again, you are an idiot.




-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/724820386985934848

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Do Enhydra & other otters have rel.large brains? Lutra?

Still no answer, except this:
kudu runner:

You already asked this 4 months ago:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.anthropology.paleo/c/v-KIZewRWVA/m/ReCgpEYoCwAJ
Are you becoming senile?

Much less than you apparently: when prof.Tobias said "All the former savannah supporters (incl. myself) must now swallow our earlier words in the light of the new results from the early hominid deposits" & "savannah is eliminated as a primary cause,

or selective advantage of bipedalism", he also was called "becoming senile" by

kudu runner snipped:

And in what decade did he say that? Hint - he died in 2012. We
have far more data now than then.

:-) Of course, but you're still running after kudus...
:-DDD
How incredibly stupid can one be?

Only incredible idiots deny that Pleistocene archaic Homo was semi-aquatic:
we have at least 8 *independent* indications:
this is no coincidence:
•H.erectus' brain size (2x apes-australopiths) is facilitated by sea-foods, e.g. DHA docosa-hexaenoic acid in shellfish: Odontocetes, Pinnipedia...
•Homo’s intercontinental dispersals was coastal.
•Pleist.Homo colonized Flores & even Luzon, far oversea https://www.academia.edu/36193382/Coastal_Dispersal_of_Pleistocene_Homo_2018
•H.erectus s.s. fossilized in coastal sediments, e.g. Mojokerto: barnacles & corals; Trinil Pseudodon & Elongaria (edible shellfish); Sangiran-17: "brackish marsh near the coast".
•Stephen Munro: sea-shell engravings made by H.erectus, Joordens cs 2015 Nature 518:228–231 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25470048/
•Archaic Homo's atypical tooth-wear is caused by "sand & oral processing of marine mollusks", Towle cs 2022 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.24500
•Ear exostoses (H.erectus & H.neand.) develop after years of cold(er) water irrigation. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5696936/
•Pachy-osteo-sclerosis is only seen in slow+shallow-diving tetrapods, de Buffrénil cs 2010 J.Mamm.Evol.17:101, e.g. erectus’ parietal bone is 2x as thick as in gorillas.
•Homo’s stone tool use is typical for molluscivores, cf. sea-otters…

IOW, one must be stupid stupid stupid to deny that archaic Homo had a lot of aquatic foods in their diet.
Yes many self-called "paleo-anthropologists" still believe their ancestors ran after African antelopes... :-DDD

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)