Pandora wrote:
Pt eat crabs too:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.05.002
Neither aquarboreal nor semiaquatic.
If they're habitually eating crabs then by definition they are
semiaquatic.
Unless these are the more elusive "Desert Crabs" that shun
water...
It's also completely fitting with the model I describe with
Aquatic Ape groups following fresh water outlets inland. Or
they would be if Chimps were an ancestor or even if they
resembled that last common ancestor, which they don't.
Yes, I am once again reminding you that Chimps are NOT
a model for any human ancestor. They're not even a model
for a Chimp ancestor!
Are Chimp brains are dependent on DHA as the human
brain is?
Are Chimps as bad at synthesizing DHA as we humans are?
How does the female brain size of this crab eating population
compare to non crab eating populations?
Because a diet rich in DHA can't make your brain any larger
than your genetics will allow. A diet poor in DHA can result in
a SMALLER brain than your genetics allows, just as
malnutrition in general can leave a person SHORTER than they
would have been given a proper diet...
But this has all been pointed out to you so many times that it's
safe to say that it won't register in your head this time either.
"No soup for you!"
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/708628589026951168
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)