• Re: Ith's Thience!

    From Primum Sapienti@21:1/5 to JTEM on Thu Sep 15 20:16:37 2022
    XPost: alt.atheism

    Did you mean to post this instead to your alien visitors newsgroup?

    JTEM wrote:

    Oh yeah, science:

    https://youtu.be/fgaL4wEM3qc

    Paleo Anthropology is a social program at best, an
    old-boys network dedicated to defending every idiotic
    idea of the ruling elite at it's worst!

    Start with their depiction of Naledi. It's a joke, one played
    on young and/or gullible minds.

    It's got a skull that closely resembles a bonobo, they put
    it naked in trees and represent the damn things as
    hairless, looking more human than most Neanderthal
    depictions. They depict it as more humans than erectus!

    Skip to 11:34, look at the image on the screen as they
    speak about erectus... the image they are associating
    with erectus. Keep playing until 11:40 and beyond. Stare
    are the imagine they are misrepresenting as Naledi.

    This is over the top!

    It's not random, if that's what anyone is thinking. All this
    disinformation is in favor of an intelligent dare I say
    "Advanced" population of humans.

    Homo = Humans

    Everything they've claimed for this "Naledi" is pure bunk.
    It's not information, it's indoctrination.

    The depictions, as you see here, the fairytale about
    intentional burials... "Modern Structures" in the brain...

    And now brain size? Bull & shit. They have one anomalous claim
    regarding the cranial capacity of a single DIFFERENT find, one
    found in a DIFFERENT chamber than all the others...

    The anomalous claim, 610cc, conveniently elevates this
    thing above chimps, as large as Homo habilis.

    Wow. Considering truckloads of bullshit they keep "Finding"
    about this animal, yes, I'm willing to say that they made it up,
    just like they made up the age, the "Modern" brain, the
    intentional burials... the extremely human like appearance...
    EVERYTHING. It's anomalous and it matches the pattern of
    everything we know they made up, so why believe the
    anomalous large brain?

    AGE

    They told us it was over 2 million years! Now, sources vary
    but minimum age is reported as:

    200 +70/–61 ka

    https://elifesciences.org/articles/24231

    It's offensive.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to Primum Sapienti on Fri Sep 16 04:23:52 2022
    Primum Sapienti wrote:

    Did you mean to post this instead to your alien visitors newsgroup?

    Dude, if I had a group of alien visitors I'd be HYPER RICH!!!

    Maybe you meant to ask something, but out of stupidity asked this
    instead?

    JTEM wrote:

    Oh yeah, science:

    https://youtu.be/fgaL4wEM3qc

    Paleo Anthropology is a social program at best, an
    old-boys network dedicated to defending every idiotic
    idea of the ruling elite at it's worst!

    Start with their depiction of Naledi. It's a joke, one played
    on young and/or gullible minds.

    It's got a skull that closely resembles a bonobo, they put
    it naked in trees and represent the damn things as
    hairless, looking more human than most Neanderthal
    depictions. They depict it as more humans than erectus!

    Skip to 11:34, look at the image on the screen as they
    speak about erectus... the image they are associating
    with erectus. Keep playing until 11:40 and beyond. Stare
    are the imagine they are misrepresenting as Naledi.

    This is over the top!

    Shocking all the lies passing itself off as "Science" that Youtube
    allows, considering people were thrown off for quoting the box
    their mask came in when it said it will not protect against viruses...

    It's not random, if that's what anyone is thinking. All this disinformation is in favor of an intelligent dare I say
    "Advanced" population of humans.

    Homo = Humans

    Everything they've claimed for this "Naledi" is pure bunk.
    It's not information, it's indoctrination.

    All true.

    When the hoax began they claimed it was over 2 million years old,
    intentionally buried it's dead, had "modern structures" in the brain
    and was a human ancestor. Now we know it was younger than
    erectus, younger than Heidelberg man, no older than at least one
    Neanderthal find, had no "Modern Structures" -- didn't even have
    tools -- didn't bury it's dead but it's still an ancestor?????

    The depictions, as you see here, the fairytale about
    intentional burials... "Modern Structures" in the brain...

    And now brain size? Bull & shit. They have one anomalous claim
    regarding the cranial capacity of a single DIFFERENT find, one
    found in a DIFFERENT chamber than all the others...

    The anomalous claim, 610cc, conveniently elevates this
    thing above chimps, as large as Homo habilis.

    Which is true. We suddenly had a quarter of a million year old
    "Human" with a brain smaller than habilis! Not exactly compelling.
    AND THEN there's this anomalous find... this one find... just one...
    so that they can claim it's "Range" put it inside the brain size for
    habilis and above chimps.

    Yeah, I'd say that given how fake all the other claims are, this one
    is bullshit too.

    Wow. Considering truckloads of bullshit they keep "Finding"
    about this animal, yes, I'm willing to say that they made it up,
    just like they made up the age, the "Modern" brain, the
    intentional burials... the extremely human like appearance...
    EVERYTHING. It's anomalous and it matches the pattern of
    everything we know they made up, so why believe the
    anomalous large brain?

    AGE

    They told us it was over 2 million years! Now, sources vary
    but minimum age is reported as:

    200 +70/–61 ka

    https://elifesciences.org/articles/24231

    It's offensive.

    JTEM is right, again. As if there were any doubt.




    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/695500485414764544

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Primum Sapienti@21:1/5 to JTEM is so reasonable on Thu Sep 22 23:09:15 2022
    XPost: alt.atheism

    JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
    Primum Sapienti wrote:

    Did you mean to post this instead to your alien visitors newsgroup?

    Dude, if I had a group of alien visitors I'd be HYPER RICH!!!

    I said "newsgroup", not "group".

    Maybe you meant to ask something, but out of stupidity asked this
    instead?

    JTEM wrote:

    Oh yeah, science:

    https://youtu.be/fgaL4wEM3qc

    Paleo Anthropology is a social program at best, an
    old-boys network dedicated to defending every idiotic
    idea of the ruling elite at it's worst!

    Start with their depiction of Naledi. It's a joke, one played
    on young and/or gullible minds.

    It's got a skull that closely resembles a bonobo, they put
    it naked in trees and represent the damn things as
    hairless, looking more human than most Neanderthal
    depictions. They depict it as more humans than erectus!

    Skip to 11:34, look at the image on the screen as they
    speak about erectus... the image they are associating
    with erectus. Keep playing until 11:40 and beyond. Stare
    are the imagine they are misrepresenting as Naledi.

    This is over the top!

    Shocking all the lies passing itself off as "Science" that Youtube
    allows, considering people were thrown off for quoting the box
    their mask came in when it said it will not protect against viruses...

    It's not random, if that's what anyone is thinking. All this
    disinformation is in favor of an intelligent dare I say
    "Advanced" population of humans.

    Homo = Humans

    Everything they've claimed for this "Naledi" is pure bunk.
    It's not information, it's indoctrination.

    All true.

    When the hoax began they claimed it was over 2 million years old, intentionally buried it's dead, had "modern structures" in the brain
    and was a human ancestor. Now we know it was younger than
    erectus, younger than Heidelberg man, no older than at least one
    Neanderthal find, had no "Modern Structures" -- didn't even have
    tools -- didn't bury it's dead but it's still an ancestor?????

    The depictions, as you see here, the fairytale about
    intentional burials... "Modern Structures" in the brain...

    And now brain size? Bull & shit. They have one anomalous claim
    regarding the cranial capacity of a single DIFFERENT find, one
    found in a DIFFERENT chamber than all the others...

    The anomalous claim, 610cc, conveniently elevates this
    thing above chimps, as large as Homo habilis.

    Which is true. We suddenly had a quarter of a million year old
    "Human" with a brain smaller than habilis! Not exactly compelling.
    AND THEN there's this anomalous find... this one find... just one...
    so that they can claim it's "Range" put it inside the brain size for
    habilis and above chimps.

    Yeah, I'd say that given how fake all the other claims are, this one
    is bullshit too.

    Wow. Considering truckloads of bullshit they keep "Finding"
    about this animal, yes, I'm willing to say that they made it up,
    just like they made up the age, the "Modern" brain, the
    intentional burials... the extremely human like appearance...
    EVERYTHING. It's anomalous and it matches the pattern of
    everything we know they made up, so why believe the
    anomalous large brain?

    AGE

    They told us it was over 2 million years! Now, sources vary
    but minimum age is reported as:

    200 +70/–61 ka

    https://elifesciences.org/articles/24231

    It's offensive.

    JTEM is right, again. As if there were any doubt.

    Did you get that from your space alien friends?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to Primum Sapienti on Thu Sep 22 23:15:39 2022
    Primum Sapienti wrote:

    JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
    Dude, if I had a group of alien visitors I'd be HYPER RICH!!!

    I said "newsgroup", not "group".

    I don't have a newsgroup at all. So, I guess that makes you clever???

    JTEM is right, again. As if there were any doubt.

    Did you get that from your space alien friends?

    You're not good at this. At all. And the fact that you flew off the rails because I pointed out the stupidity of "Homo Naledi"... well... what
    can I say that I haven't already said a dozen times or more?





    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/696159783196246016

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)