Pandora wrote:
"A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior)"
"Fallacious Argument."
Google it. In particular you need to study ad hominem.
See, right here right now you're displaying a sense of superiority even
as you avoid everything I've said. You're not attacking my position,
you're attacking me. In my case, on the other hand, it is NOT ad hominem.
My pointing out your enormous personal flaws, including your
narcissism, is NOT "my argument." It's in response to you once again
AVOIDING an argument that you can't control, distracting from that
argument you can't control and instead lobbing personal attacks.
Personal attacks as "Argument" = ad hominem
An argument that INCLUDES but is not limited to personal attack = Nope
Savanna idiocy is not even internally consistent, as I pointed out. They evolved the ability to survive on the savanna by surviving on the savanna. Endurance hunting caused them to evolve the means to endurance run!
None of the contradictions exist for Aquatic Ape. All they had to do was
pick up stuff & eat it. That's it. That all by itself provides them with a
diet with all the protein they could ever need, and then some. That alone
would grow their brains just as large as genetics would allow, and leave
them poised to spring on any mutations that allowed for even larger
brains. That alone gets them everywhere! It's the reason and the means
for migrating across the globe: Following the coast, picking up stuff &
eating it.
The savanna idiocy can't even explain the savanna, while Aquatic Ape
explains everything.
Anyone who believes in savanna idiocy would have to be so stupid that
they'd... I dunno... they'd have to be so stupid that they'd believe
something like "Naledi buried their dead."
Do you know anyone that stupid?
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/701970720341770240
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)