So I've pointed it out in the past, how for many
generations the creationists "Argued" that if man
evolved from monkeys then how come there are
still monkeys?
NOTE: The LCA of man & monkeys was indeed a
monkey.
So everyone agrees it's a dumb argument, except
mainstream paleo anthropology! I've quoted
people saying this before and now I'm doing it
again here. In this case it's habilis:
If erectus evolved from habilis then how come there
were still habilis?
https://youtu.be/4HTZUsQoEoQ
But, hey, I am constantly committing the sin of
consistency. Stupid argument, to my mind, remain
stupid even when used by "Your side."
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/680355372617400320
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)