All so-called"scientific" PA papers with the word "hominin" should be rejected, or "hominin" should be replaced by "hominind" (sensu Homo, Pan, Gorilla + fossil relatives):you be?), but simply for wading upright & climbing arms overhead.
the word "hominin" presupposes everything that is "bipedal", but most likely all hominids (possibly all hominoids - hylobatids are still predom."upright") had "bipedal" (upright, vertical) ancestors, not for running over savannas (how ridiculous can
Apes differ drastically from monkeys:
- body weight often x 10 or more
- spine centrally in the body, not dorsally
- very broad build: sternum, thorax, pelvis
- limbs aside of the body, not ventrally
- tail loss (incorporated into pelvic bottom)
Monkeys are typical arboreal mammals.
Apes became different: 30-20 Ma:
google "aquarboreal".
On Wednesday, September 15, 2021 at 2:36:02 PM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote:you be?), but simply for wading upright & climbing arms overhead.
All so-called"scientific" PA papers with the word "hominin" should be rejected, or "hominin" should be replaced by "hominind" (sensu Homo, Pan, Gorilla + fossil relatives):
the word "hominin" presupposes everything that is "bipedal", but most likely all hominids (possibly all hominoids - hylobatids are still predom."upright") had "bipedal" (upright, vertical) ancestors, not for running over savannas (how ridiculous can
Apes differ drastically from monkeys:
- body weight often x 10 or more
- spine centrally in the body, not dorsally
- very broad build: sternum, thorax, pelvis
- limbs aside of the body, not ventrally
- tail loss (incorporated into pelvic bottom)
Monkeys are typical arboreal mammals.
Apes became different: 30-20 Ma:
google "aquarboreal".
Gibbons and humans have chins.
On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 19:58:03 -0700 (PDT), "DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves" <[email protected]> wrote:you be?), but simply for wading upright & climbing arms overhead.
On Wednesday, September 15, 2021 at 2:36:02 PM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote:
All so-called"scientific" PA papers with the word "hominin" should be rejected, or "hominin" should be replaced by "hominind" (sensu Homo, Pan, Gorilla + fossil relatives):
the word "hominin" presupposes everything that is "bipedal", but most likely all hominids (possibly all hominoids - hylobatids are still predom."upright") had "bipedal" (upright, vertical) ancestors, not for running over savannas (how ridiculous can
Apes differ drastically from monkeys:
- body weight often x 10 or more
- spine centrally in the body, not dorsally
- very broad build: sternum, thorax, pelvis
- limbs aside of the body, not ventrally
- tail loss (incorporated into pelvic bottom)
Monkeys are typical arboreal mammals.
Apes became different: 30-20 Ma:
google "aquarboreal".
Gibbons and humans have chins.Compare: http://eskeletons.org/sites/eskeletons.org/files//image/orientation/gibbon_skull_mandible_Lateral_0.jpg
http://eskeletons.org/sites/eskeletons.org/files//image/orientation/chimpanzee_skull_mandible_Lateral_0.jpg
http://eskeletons.org/sites/eskeletons.org/files//image/orientation/human_skull_mandible_Lateral_1.jpg
See also: <https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-human-chin-revisited%3A-what-is-it-and-who-has-it-Schwartz-Tattersall/66635def87ed050f2a5f9901f2b3831e94765c3c>
On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 19:58:03 -0700 (PDT), "DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves" <[email protected]> wrote:you be?), but simply for wading upright & climbing arms overhead.
On Wednesday, September 15, 2021 at 2:36:02 PM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote:
All so-called"scientific" PA papers with the word "hominin" should be rejected, or "hominin" should be replaced by "hominind" (sensu Homo, Pan, Gorilla + fossil relatives):
the word "hominin" presupposes everything that is "bipedal", but most likely all hominids (possibly all hominoids - hylobatids are still predom."upright") had "bipedal" (upright, vertical) ancestors, not for running over savannas (how ridiculous can
Apes differ drastically from monkeys:
- body weight often x 10 or more
- spine centrally in the body, not dorsally
- very broad build: sternum, thorax, pelvis
- limbs aside of the body, not ventrally
- tail loss (incorporated into pelvic bottom)
Monkeys are typical arboreal mammals.
Apes became different: 30-20 Ma:
google "aquarboreal".
Gibbons and humans have chins.Compare: http://eskeletons.org/sites/eskeletons.org/files//image/orientation/gibbon_skull_mandible_Lateral_0.jpg
http://eskeletons.org/sites/eskeletons.org/files//image/orientation/chimpanzee_skull_mandible_Lateral_0.jpg
http://eskeletons.org/sites/eskeletons.org/files//image/orientation/human_skull_mandible_Lateral_1.jpg
See also: <https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-human-chin-revisited%3A-what-is-it-and-who-has-it-Schwartz-Tattersall/66635def87ed050f2a5f9901f2b3831e94765c3c>
you be?), but simply for wading upright & climbing arms overhead.All so-called"scientific" PA papers with the word "hominin" should be rejected, or "hominin" should be replaced by "hominind" (sensu Homo, Pan, Gorilla + fossil relatives):
the word "hominin" presupposes everything that is "bipedal", but most likely all hominids (possibly all hominoids - hylobatids are still predom."upright") had "bipedal" (upright, vertical) ancestors, not for running over savannas (how ridiculous can
Apes differ drastically from monkeys:
- body weight often x 10 or more
- spine centrally in the body, not dorsally
- very broad build: sternum, thorax, pelvis
- limbs aside of the body, not ventrally
- tail loss (incorporated into pelvic bottom)
Monkeys are typical arboreal mammals.
Apes became different: 30-20 Ma:
google "aquarboreal".
Gibbons and humans have chins.
Op donderdag 16 september 2021 om 04:58:04 UTC+2 schreef DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves:can you be?), but simply for wading upright & climbing arms overhead.
All so-called"scientific" PA papers with the word "hominin" should be rejected, or "hominin" should be replaced by "hominind" (sensu Homo, Pan, Gorilla + fossil relatives):
the word "hominin" presupposes everything that is "bipedal", but most likely all hominids (possibly all hominoids - hylobatids are still predom."upright") had "bipedal" (upright, vertical) ancestors, not for running over savannas (how ridiculous
Wading gibbons??Apes differ drastically from monkeys:
- body weight often x 10 or more
- spine centrally in the body, not dorsally
- very broad build: sternum, thorax, pelvis
- limbs aside of the body, not ventrally
- tail loss (incorporated into pelvic bottom)
Monkeys are typical arboreal mammals.
Apes became different: 30-20 Ma:
google "aquarboreal".
Gibbons and humans have chins.Yes, my litle boy, gibbons are "hominin".
likely all hominids (possibly all hominoids - hylobatids are still predom."upright") had "bipedal" (upright, vertical) ancestors, not for running over savannas (how ridiculous can you be?), but simply for wading upright & climbing arms overhead.All so-called"scientific" PA papers with the word "hominin" should be rejected, or "hominin" should be replaced by "hominind" (sensu Homo, Pan, Gorilla + fossil relatives): the word "hominin" presupposes everything that is "bipedal", but most
Apes differ drastically from monkeys:
- body weight often x 10 or more
- spine centrally in the body, not dorsally
- very broad build: sternum, thorax, pelvis
- limbs aside of the body, not ventrally
- tail loss (incorporated into pelvic bottom)
Monkeys are typical arboreal mammals. Apes became different: 30-20 Ma: google "aquarboreal".
Gibbons and humans have chins.
Yes, my litle boy, gibbons are "hominin".
Wading gibbons??
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 21:49:02 |
| Calls: | 12,104 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 15,004 |
| Messages: | 6,518,114 |
