1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.WOODWORKING

  • Squares

    From JayPique@21:1/5 to All on Wed Sep 20 02:50:04 2023
    Is a square square still square even if it's not a Woodpeckers?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Puckdropper@21:1/5 to JayPique on Thu Sep 21 00:13:05 2023
    JayPique <[email protected]> wrote in news:5a14d434-f12e-4c32-9adb- [email protected]:

    Is a square square still square even if it's not a Woodpeckers?


    Don't worry, fam, I've got this!

    **
    **
    **
    **
    **
    **
    *2^2 pages of drivel later*
    **
    **
    **
    **
    **
    **

    So you can see that a square square is actually not desirable when a wood pecker is involved and actually the wood pecker should be somewhat
    flexible and not pecking something wood. But in a case of a self-
    inflicted scarcity, if all you've got is wood and a pecker you gotta peck
    the wood.

    Definitely not Puckdropper

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JayPique@21:1/5 to Puckdropper on Wed Sep 20 17:38:01 2023
    On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 8:17:49 PM UTC-4, Puckdropper wrote:
    JayPique <[email protected]> wrote in news:5a14d434-f12e-4c32-9adb- [email protected]:
    Is a square square still square even if it's not a Woodpeckers?

    So you've got square^square and you're asking if it's equal to square?

    No, unless you call the square root symbol a woodpecker--I guess you can kinda see a beak if you look at the right angle...

    So yes,
    square=woodpecker(square^square)

    So in answer to your question, I have proven empirically that a square square isn't a square unless a woodpecker is involved.

    Puckdropper, allegedly

    Ed Bennett and Steve Strickland would disagree.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Puckdropper@21:1/5 to JayPique on Thu Sep 21 00:17:43 2023
    JayPique <[email protected]> wrote in news:5a14d434-f12e-4c32-9adb- [email protected]:

    Is a square square still square even if it's not a Woodpeckers?


    So you've got square^square and you're asking if it's equal to square?

    No, unless you call the square root symbol a woodpecker--I guess you can
    kinda see a beak if you look at the right angle...

    So yes,
    square=woodpecker(square^square)

    So in answer to your question, I have proven empirically that a square
    square isn't a square unless a woodpecker is involved.

    Puckdropper, allegedly

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)